Global Health Research Group on Children’s Non-Communicable Diseases Collaborative. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with paediatric cancer in low-income, middle-income and high-income countries: a multicentre, international, observational cohort study

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in childhood and adolescent cancer care in northern Tanzania: a cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has strained healthcare systems and presented unique challenges for children requiring cancer care, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to cancer care for children and adolescents in Northern Tanzania.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we assessed the demographic and clinical characteristics of 547 pediatric and adolescent cancer patients (ages 0-19 years old) between 2016 and 2022 using the population-based Kilimanjaro Cancer Registry (KCR). We categorized data into pre-COVID-19 (2016-2019) and COVID-19 (2020-2022) eras, and performed descriptive analyses of diagnostic, treatment, and demographic information. A secondary analysis was conducted on a subset of 167 patients with stage of diagnosis at presentation.

RESULTS

Overall admissions nearly doubled during the pandemic (n = 190 versus 357). The variety of diagnoses attended at KCMC increased during the pandemic, with only five groups of diseases reported in 2016 to twelve groups of diseases in 2021. Most patients were diagnosed at a late stage (stage III or IV) across eras, with the proportion of under-five years old patients increasing late-diagnoses from 29.4% (before the pandemic), 52.8% (during the pandemic), when compared to the overall cohort. Around 95% of children in this age category reported late-stage diagnosis during the pandemic. Six out of the twelve cancer site groups also reported an increase in late-stage diagnosis. During the pandemic, the proportion of children receiving surgery increased from 15.8 to 30.8% (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Childhood and adolescent cancer care changed in Northern Tanzania during the COVID-19 pandemic, with increased late-stage diagnoses presentations among younger patients and the increased use of surgical therapies in the context of a growing practice. Understanding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric and adolescent cancer care can help us better adapt healthcare systems and interventions to the emerging needs of children and adolescents with cancer in the midst of a health crisis.

Global retinoblastoma studies: A review

In the current era of global health awareness for retinoblastoma (RB), the challenge that lies ahead of us is providing optimal care for children affected with RB in underdeveloped nations. The understanding of similarities and disparities between various nations across the world aids in achieving comparable outcomes. With dissolving geographic barriers and evolving collaboration, global collaborative studies on RB are becoming increasingly common. They provide real-world, robust evidence on several aspects of RB. This review discusses insights gained from global RB studies regarding the demographics, certain aspects of etiopathogenesis and epidemiology, international travel burden, disparities in clinical presentations based on national income levels, management protocols, pathology, treatment outcomes, and the effect of COVID-19 on RB care across the world. These insights are likely to impact individual practice as well as inform policy reforms.

The Effect of COVID-19 on Oncology Care for Adolescents and Young Adults in Latin America

Children with cancer in low- and middle-income countries were disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, but little is known about how adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer were affected. Sixty-seven physicians and nonphysician providers were interviewed about their experiences caring for AYAs with cancer in Latin America. Quotes related to the COVID-19 pandemic were identified and grouped into themes. Barriers from the COVID-19 pandemic included limited space, restrictions on travel, reduced funding, limited staff, limited services, and changes to treatment. However, improvements to care that arose from the COVID-19 pandemic included better access to distance learning and telemedicine.

COVID-19 in Pediatric Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Lymphoma

Importance

COVID-19 in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or lymphoma (ALL/LLy) has not been described in detail and may affect chemotherapy administration and long-term outcomes.

Objective

To describe the clinical presentation of COVID-19 and chemotherapy modifications in pediatric patients with ALL/LLy.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This is a retrospective case series of patients at St Jude Children's Research Hospital and its affiliate sites with newly diagnosed ALL/LLy who were treated on the Total XVII protocol (NCT03117751) between March 30, 2020, and June 20, 2022. Participants included patients aged 1 to 18 years who were receiving protocol chemotherapy. Acute symptoms and chemotherapy modifications were evaluated for 60 days after the COVID-19 diagnosis, and viral clearance, adverse events, and second SARS-CoV-2 infections were followed up during the 27-month study period.

Exposures

SARS-CoV-2; all patients were screened at least weekly and at symptom onset and/or after known exposure to SARS-CoV-2.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Description of the spectrum of COVID-19 illness and chemotherapy modifications.

Results

Of 308 pediatric patients, 110 (36%) developed COVID-19 at a median age of 8.2 (IQR, 5.3-14.5) years. Sixty-eight patients (62%) were male. Most patients were in the continuation/maintenance phase of chemotherapy (101 [92%]). Severe disease was rare (7 [6%]) but was associated with older age, higher white blood cell counts at ALL/LLy diagnosis, lower absolute lymphocyte counts at COVID-19 diagnosis, abnormal chest imaging findings, and SARS-CoV-2 reinfection. Rare but serious thrombotic events included pulmonary embolism and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (n = 1 for each). No multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children or death was seen. SARS-CoV-2 reinfection occurred in 11 patients (10%) and was associated with older age and with receiving standard or high-risk vs low-risk ALL/LLy therapy. Chemotherapy interruptions occurred in 96 patients (87%) and were longer for patients with severe disease, SARS-CoV-2 reinfection, and/or a COVID-19 diagnosis during the pre-Omicron variant period vs the post-Omicron period (after December 27, 2021).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this case series of COVID-19 in pediatric patients with ALL/LLy, severe COVID-19 was rare, but chemotherapy administration was affected in most patients. Long-term studies are needed to establish the outcomes of COVID-19 in this population.

Incidence of bacterial and fungal infections in Polish pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia during the pandemic

The most common complications related to the treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are infections. The aim of the study was to analyze the incidence and mortality rates among pediatric patients with ALL who were treated in 17 Polish pediatric hematology centers in 2020-2021 during the pandemic. Additionally, we compared these results with those of our previous study, which we conducted in the years 2012-2017. The retrospective analysis included 460 patients aged 1-18 years with newly diagnosed ALL. In our study, 361/460 (78.5%) children were reported to have microbiologically documented bacterial infections during chemotherapy. Ten patients (2.8%) died due to sepsis. Fungal infections were reported in 99 children (21.5%), of whom five (5.1%) died due to the infection. We especially observed an increase in bacterial infections during the pandemic period compared to the previous study. The directions of our actions should be to consider antibiotic prophylaxis, shorten the duration of hospitalization, and educate parents and medical staff about complications (mainly infections) during anticancer therapy. It is necessary to continue clinical studies evaluating infection prophylaxis to improve outcomes in childhood ALL patients.

Readmission rates and outcomes in adults with and without COVID-19 following inpatient chemotherapy admission: A nationwide analysis

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has received considerable attention in the scientific community due to its impact on healthcare systems and various diseases. However, little focus has been given to its effect on cancer treatment.

AIM

To determine the effect of COVID-19 pandemic on cancer patients' care.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) was conducted to analyze hospitalization patterns of patients receiving inpatient chemotherapy (IPCT) during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Two cohorts were defined based on readmission within 30 d and 90 d. Demographic information, readmission rates, hospital-specific variables, length of hospital stay (LOS), and treatment costs were analyzed. Comorbidities were assessed using the Elixhauser comorbidity index. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of readmission. Statistical analysis was conducted using Stata® Version 16 software. As the NRD data is anonymous and cannot be used to identify patients, institutional review board approval was not required for this study.

RESULTS

A total of 87755 hospitalizations for IPCT were identified during the pandemic. Among the 30-day index admission cohort, 55005 patients were included, with 32903 readmissions observed, resulting in a readmission rate of 59.8%. For the 90-day index admission cohort, 33142 patients were included, with 24503 readmissions observed, leading to a readmission rate of 73.93%. The most common causes of readmission included encounters with chemotherapy (66.7%), neutropenia (4.36%), and sepsis (3.3%). Comorbidities were significantly higher among readmitted hospitalizations compared to index hospitalizations in both readmission cohorts. The total cost of readmission for both cohorts amounted to 1193000000.00 dollars. Major predictors of 30-day readmission included peripheral vascular disorders [Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.09, P < 0.05], paralysis (HR = 1.26, P < 0.001), and human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immuno-deficiency syndrome (HR = 1.14, P = 0.03). Predictors of 90-day readmission included lymphoma (HR = 1.14, P < 0.01), paralysis (HR = 1.21, P = 0.02), and peripheral vascular disorders (HR = 1.15, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted the management of patients undergoing IPCT. These findings highlight the urgent need for a more strategic approach to the care of patients receiving IPCT during pandemics.

Infections in Children with Cancer Admitted in an Oncology Reference Hospital: A Cross-sectional Study

Pediatric oncology patients are usually immunosuppressed due to factors such as the neoplasm and its treatment, making them more susceptible to infections. This article aims to determine the infection profile of pediatric oncology patients admitted to an oncology reference hospital in Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. A retrospective and cross-sectional study was conducted, collecting data from patients hospitalized due to infection in a pediatric oncology unit exclusively for the Brazilian public health system, spanning from 2018 to 2021. A total of 168 episodes of infections were identified in 96 patients, resulting in 157 hospitalizations. Among the patients with infections, 62.4% had hematological malignancies, and out of these cases, 74.6% specifically had Acute Lymphoid Leukemia. The Escherichia coli (31.9%) was the most prevalent microorganism isolated from the samples. Multidrug-resistant microorganisms accounted for 52% of all identified microorganisms. Fluoroquinolones and beta-lactam were the most prevalent antibiotic classes in the analyzed antibiograms. Factors such as Sex, type of cancer, chemotherapy in the last 30 days, were found to be associated with the occurrence of infection (p < 0.05). Conducting epidemiological studies regarding infections in pediatric oncology is crucial to development of empirical protocols, and the implementation of strategies to better control future infections.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on paediatric renal tumour presentation and management, a SIOP renal tumour study group study

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic had global catastrophic effects on the management of non-communicable diseases including paediatric cancers. Restrictions during the start of 2020 complicated timely referrals of patients to specialized centres. We aimed to evaluate the pandemic's impact on the number of new diagnoses, disease characteristics and management delay for paediatric renal tumour patients included in the SIOP-RTSG-UMBRELLA study, as compared with data from a historical SIOP-RTSG trial (2005-2009).

METHODS

The number of intensive care admissions, population mobility rates and national lockdown periods/restrictions were used as proxies of the pandemic's severity and impact on societies. Clinical and tumour data were extracted from the SIOP-RTSG-UMBRELLA study and from historical SIOP-RTSG trials.

RESULTS

During the first lockdown in Europe, the number of newly diagnosed patients decreased following restrictions and population immobilisation. Additionally, there was a higher proportion of advanced disease (37% vs. 17% before and after COVID-9, p < 0.001) and larger median tumour volume (559 cm3 vs. 328 and 434 cm3 before and after, p < 0.0001). Also in Brazil, the proportion of advanced disease was higher during the national decrease in mobilisation and start of restrictions (50% and 24% vs. 11% and 18% before and after, p < 0.01). Tumour volume in Brazil was also higher during the first months of COVID-19 (599 cm3 vs. 459 and 514 cm3 ), although not significant (p = 0.17). We did not observe any delays in referral time nor in time to start treatment, even though COVID-19 restrictions may have caused children to reach care later.

CONCLUSION

The COVID-19 pandemic briefly changed the tumour characteristics of children presenting with renal tumours. The longer-term impact on clinical outcomes will be kept under review.

Telemedicine in Care of Sarcoma Patients beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Opportunities

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has created a challenging environment for sarcoma patients. Most oncology societies published guidelines or recommendations prioritizing sarcoma patients and established telehealth as an efficient method of approaching them. The aim of this review is the assessment of current evidence regarding the utilization of telemedicine in diagnosis, treatment modalities, telerehabilitation and satisfaction among sarcoma patients and healthcare providers (HP).

METHODS

This systematic review was carried out using the databases PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).

RESULTS

The application of telemedicine to the management of sarcoma has yielded improved clinical and psychological outcomes. Specifically, significant progress has been demonstrated in the areas of tele-oncology and telerehabilitation during the last decade, and the COVID-19 outbreak has accelerated this transition toward them. Telehealth has been proven efficient in a wide spectrum of applications from consultations on physical therapy and psychological support to virtual care symptom management. Both HP and patients reported satisfaction with telehealth services at levels comparable to in-person visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Telehealth has already unveiled many opportunities in tailoring individualized care, and its role in the management of sarcoma patients has been established in the post-COVID-19 era, as well.

Impact of the COVID-19 on the surgical management of bone and soft tissue sarcoma: A systematic review

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic had greatly and negatively impacted health services including the management of bone and soft tissue sarcoma. As disease progression is time-sensitive, decision taken by the oncology orthopedic surgeon on performing surgical treatment determines the patient outcome. On the other hand, as the world tried to control the spread of COVID-19 infection, treatment re-prioritization based on urgency level had to be done which consequently affect treatment provision for sarcoma patients. Patient and clinician's concern regarding the outbreak have also inflicted on treatment decision making. A systematic review was thought to be necessary to summarize the changes seen in managing primary malignant bone and soft tissue tumors.

Methods

We performed this systematic review in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Statement. The review protocol had been registered on PROSPERO with submission number CRD42022329430. We included studies which reported primary malignant tumor diagnosis and its surgical intervention from March 11th, 2020 onwards. The main outcome is to report changes implemented by different centers around the world in managing primary malignant bone tumors surgically in response to the pandemic. Three electronic medical databases were scoured and by applying eligibility criteria. Individual authors evaluated the articles' quality and risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale other instruments developed by JBI of the University of Adelaide. The overall quality assessment of this systematic review was self-evaluated using the AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) Checklist.

Results

There were 26 studies included in the review with various study designs, conveyed in almost all continents. The outcomes from this review are change in surgery time, change in surgery type, and change in surgery indication in patients with primary bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Surgery timing has been experiencing delay since the pandemic occurred, including delay in the multidisciplinary forum, which were all related to lockdown regulations and travel restrictions. For surgery type, limb amputation was preferred compared to limb-salvage procedures due to shorter duration and simpler reconstruction with better control of malignancy. Meanwhile, the indications for surgical management are still based on the patient's demographics and disease stages. However, some would stall surgery regardless of malignancy infiltration and fracture risks which are indication for amputation. As expected, our meta-analysis showed higher post-surgical mortality in patients with malignant bone and soft tissue sarcoma during the COVID-19 pandemic with odds ratio of 1.14.

Conclusion

Surgical management of patients with primary bone and soft tissue sarcoma has seriously been affected due to adjustments to the COVID-19 pandemic. Other than institutional restrictions to contain the infection, patient and clinician's decisions to postpone treatment due to COVID-19 transmission concern were also impactful in treatment course. Delay in surgery timing has caused higher risk of worse surgical outcome during the pandemic, which is aggravated if the patient is infected by COVID-19 as well. As we transition into a post-COVID-19 pandemic period, we expect patients to be more lenient in returning for their treatment but by then disease progression might have taken place, resulting in worse overall prognosis. Limitation to this study were few assumptions made in the synthesis of numerical data and meta-analysis only for changes in surgery time outcome and lack of intervention studies included.

COVID-19 coronavirus infection in children: Clinical presentation, diagnosis, vaccination, and treatment

In late 2019, a new subtype of coronavirus named Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2) rapidly spread around the world, causing a global pandemic. Initially, the proportion of confirmed cases among children was relatively small, and it was believed that children were rarely infected. Subsequent observations have shown that in children and adolescents, the infection is either asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic, and therefore the true incidence is underestimated due to the lack of testing. The article systematizes the results of studies on the prevalence, diagnosis, clinical features, vaccination, and treatment of children with a new coronavirus infection COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2. The SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate throughout the peak of the pandemic in children was low compared to adults. Children are not only less likely to become infected with the virus, but they also endure the infection more easily than adults. The mortality rate in children with COVID-19 was <0.5%. In most children, infection is either asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic. Vaccination of children and adolescents is recommended mainly to achieve herd immunity in all age groups. However, there are no convincing data on the duration of the immune response, the level of the required protective antibody titer, as well as on the long-term side effects of vaccination due to the insufficient follow-up period and the uncertainty of the immune response criteria. As information is accumulated on the viral load of children and adolescents, their role in the transmission of the virus, diagnostic approaches in this age group are optimized. The effectiveness of the treatment was tested on patients admitted to the hospital, and recommendations for treatment were developed. Currently, global research efforts are focused on the protection of particularly vulnerable children, the prospects for total childhood vaccination, its effectiveness and safety.