Role of cardiac CT in the diagnostic evaluation and risk stratification of patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): rationale and design of the MINOCA-GR study

Imaging patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA)

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) defines a heterogeneous group of atherosclerotic and non-atherosclerotic conditions, causing myocardial injury in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. Unveiling the mechanisms subtended to the acute event is often challenging; a multimodality imaging approach is helpful to aid the diagnosis. Invasive coronary imaging with intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography should be used, when available, during index angiography to detect plaque disruption or spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance has instead a key role among the non-invasive modalities, allowing the differentiation between MINOCA and its non-ischaemic mimics and providing prognostic information. This educational paper will provide a comprehensive review of the strengths and limitations of each imaging modality in the evaluation of patients with a working diagnosis of MINOCA.

MINOCA biomarkers: Non-atherosclerotic aspects

Myocardial infarction in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) is an important subtype of myocardial infarction. Although comprising less than 50% stenosis in the main epicardial coronary arteries, it constitutes a severe health risk. A variety of approaches have been recommended, but definitive diagnosis remains elusive. In addition, the lack of a comprehensive understanding of underlying pathophysiology makes clinical management difficult and unpredictable. This review highlights ongoing efforts to identify relevant biomarkers in MINOCA to improve diagnosis, individualize treatment and better predict outcomes.

MINOCA: A Working Diagnosis

Cases of patients presenting with myocardial infarction (MI) without angiographic obstructive CAD are not trivial and have significant prevalence. "The Fourth Universal Definition of MI" (4UDMI) published in 2018 introduced MI with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). The new section was of great importance as it validated the diagnosis by defining its criteria and recognizing its presence in the community and the need for further investigation. Given the nature of the diagnosis of MINOCA, coronary angiography provides limited information about prognosis and risk stratification for future major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Thus, additional imaging to understand the underlying etiology of MINOCA in conjunction with a better understanding of prognostic factors is necessary to expand on the current guidelines and aid in screening for possible complications, risk of MACE, and all-cause mortality. Discerning the etiology of the presentation is crucial, and physiologic studies, as well as additional imaging, are an important part of this evaluation. These modalities include intravascular studies such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), fractional flow reserve (FFR), and imaging in the form of cardiac CT (CCT) and cardiac MRI (CMR). This step is essential to target treatment regimens more efficiently. The purpose of promoting multiple imaging modalities beyond traditional angiography is to address the working MINOCA diagnosis, with the finality of identifying the specific ischemic pathophysiology. MINOCA has multiple causative mechanisms, making it a heterogeneous collection of etiologies, resulting in acute MI: atherosclerotic, and non-atherosclerotic. This literature revision demonstrates that MINOCA prevalence and mortality are not trivial, and the diagnosis affects quality of life. MINOCA presents a definitive risk of MACE without proper stratification and targeted medical therapy. Several prognostic factors of morbidity and mortality in MI-CAD patients have been identified to correlate with MINOCA patients, especially inflammatory markers. MINOCA is not an exclusion diagnosis but a working diagnosis for which further imaging studies should be performed.

Diagnostic Puzzles and Cause-Targeted Treatment Strategies in Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: An Updated Review

Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is a distinct subtype of myocardial infarction (MI), occurring in about 8-10% of spontaneous MI cases referred for coronary angiography. Unlike MI with obstructive coronary artery disease, MINOCA's pathogenesis is more intricate and heterogeneous, involving mechanisms such as coronary thromboembolism, coronary vasospasm, microvascular dysfunction, dissection, or plaque rupture. Diagnosing MINOCA presents challenges and includes invasive and non-invasive strategies aiming to differentiate it from alternative diagnoses and confirm the criteria of elevated cardiac biomarkers, non-obstructive coronary arteries, and the absence of alternate explanations for the acute presentation. Tailored management strategies for MINOCA hinge on identifying the underlying cause of the infarction, necessitating systematic diagnostic approaches. Furthermore, determining the optimal post-MINOCA medication regimen remains uncertain. This review aims to comprehensively address the current state of knowledge, encompassing diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, in the context of MINOCA while also highlighting the evolving landscape and future directions for advancing our understanding and management of this intricate myocardial infarction subtype.

Contemporary Diagnosis and Management of Patients with MINOCA

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is defined as acute myocardial infarction (MI) with angiographically no obstructive coronary artery disease or stenosis ≤ 50%. MINOCA is diagnostically challenging and complex, making it difficult to manage effectively. This condition accounts for 6-8% of all MI and poses an increased risk of morbidity and mortality after diagnosis. Prompt recognition and targeted management are essential to improve outcomes and our understanding of this condition, but this process is not yet standardized. This article offers a comprehensive review of MINOCA, delving deep into its unique clinical profile, invasive and noninvasive diagnostic strategies for evaluating MINOCA in light of the lack of widespread availability for comprehensive testing, and current evidence surrounding targeted therapies for patients with MINOCA.

RECENT FINDINGS

MINOCA is not uncommon and requires comprehensive assessment using various imaging modalities to evaluate it further. MINOCA is a heterogenous working diagnosis that requires thoughtful approach to diagnose the underlying disease responsible for MINOCA further.

Do Patients with Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries Have Similar Prognosis Compared to Ones with MI-CAD?

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and it is primarily caused by acute plaque disruption and coronary occlusion. Recent studies suggest that myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) also occurs but the underlying mechanisms have not been fully understood until recently. The evidence also suggests that the clinical outcomes of patients presenting with MINOCA are similar to AMI patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (MI-CAD), including all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events. The present narrative review considers the risk factors, pathological changes, and outcomes associated with MINOCA and compares them with MI-CAD.