1
|
Ekman N, Fors A, Moons P, Boström E, Taft C. Are the content and usability of a new direct observation tool adequate for assessing competency in delivering person-centred care: a think-aloud study with patients and healthcare professionals in Sweden. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e085198. [PMID: 38950999 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/03/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the content and usability of a new direct observation tool for assessing competency in delivering person-centred care based on the Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (gPCC) framework. DESIGN This is a qualitative study using think-aloud techniques and retrospective probing interviews and analyzed using deductive content analysis. SETTING Sessions were conducted remotely via Zoom with participants in their homes or offices. PARTICIPANTS 11 participants with lengthy experience of receiving, delivering and/or implementing gPCC were recruited using purposeful sampling and selected to represent a broad variety of stakeholders and potential end-users. RESULTS Participants generally considered the content of the four main domains of the tool, that is, person-centred care activities, clinician manner, clinician skills and person-centred care goals, to be comprehensive and relevant for assessing person-centred care in general and gPCC in particular. Some participants pointed to the need to expand person-centred care activities to better reflect the emphasis on eliciting patient resources/capabilities and psychosocial needs in the gPCC framework. Think-aloud analyses revealed some usability issues primarily regarding difficulties or uncertainties in understanding several words and in using the rating scale. Probing interviews indicated that these problems could be mitigated by improving written instructions regarding response options and by replacing some words. Participants generally were satisfied with the layout and structure of the tool, but some suggested enlarging font size and text spacing to improve readability. CONCLUSION The tool appears to satisfactorily cover major person-centred care activities outlined in the gPCC framework. The inclusion of content concerning clinician manner and skills was seen as a relevant embellishment of the framework and as contributing to a more comprehensive assessment of clinician performance in the delivery of person-centred care. A revised version addressing observed content and usability issues will be tested for inter-rater and intra-rater reliability and for feasibility of use in healthcare education and quality improvement efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Ekman
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Andreas Fors
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Region Västra Götaland, Research, Education, Development and Innovation, Primary Health Care, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Philip Moons
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Eva Boström
- Department of Nursing, University of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Charles Taft
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Been-Dahmen JMJ, van der Stege H, Oldenmenger WH, Braat C, van der Lans MCM, Scheper M, van Staa A, Ista E. What factors contribute to cancer survivors' self-management skills? A cross-sectional observational study. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2024; 69:102539. [PMID: 38460391 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/11/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Many cancer survivors, facing the consequences of their disease and its treatment, have medical and supportive aftercare needs. However, limited knowledge exists regarding the relationship between support needs and survivors' self-management skills. The study aim is to explore factors contributing to cancer survivors' self-management skills. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted among cancer survivors (n = 277) of two outpatient oncology clinics at a university hospital in the Netherlands. Patients with head and neck cancer (n = 55) who had received radiotherapy and cisplatin or cetuximab were included, as well as patients who had undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (n = 222). The primary outcome was self-management skills, assessed using the Partners in Health Scale (PIH), which comprises two subscales: knowledge and coping (PIH-KC), and recognition and management of symptoms, and adherence to treatment (PIH-MSA). Secondary outcomes were quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30), self-efficacy (SECD6), patient-centered care (CAPHS), and social support (HEIQ). Machine learning-based Random Forest models were employed to construct associative models. Feature Importance (FI) was used to express the contribution to the model. RESULTS High emotional quality of life (FI = 33.1%), increased self-efficacy (FI = 22.2%), and greater social support (FI = 18.2%) were identified as key factors contributing to cancer survivors' self-management knowledge (PIH-KC). Furthermore, greater support from professionals (FI = 36.1%) and higher self-efficacy (FI = 18.2%) were found to benefit participants' recognition and management, and therapy adherence (PIH-MSA). CONCLUSIONS A patient-centered relationship between nurses and cancer survivors is essential for therapy adherence and the management of aftercare needs. Training to provide this holistic self-management support is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet M J Been-Dahmen
- Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Research Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam, P.O. Box 25035, 3001 HA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Heleen van der Stege
- Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Research Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam, P.O. Box 25035, 3001 HA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Wendy H Oldenmenger
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Cora Braat
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Mariska C M van der Lans
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Hematology, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Mark Scheper
- Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Research Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam, P.O. Box 25035, 3001 HA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Macquarie University, Faculty of Medicine and Science, Allied Health Professions, Sydney, Australia.
| | - AnneLoes van Staa
- Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Research Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam, P.O. Box 25035, 3001 HA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Erwin Ista
- Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Internal Medicine - Section Nursing Science, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care, Division of Pediatric Intensive Care, Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mills A. Promoting health through nurse-led healthy conversations. Nurs Stand 2023; 38:46-50. [PMID: 36911971 DOI: 10.7748/ns.2023.e11912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
Nurses in all settings have an important role in preventing non-communicable diseases such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, respiratory disease and diabetes mellitus. They have multiple daily opportunities in their practice to discuss health with people, with the aim of supporting behaviour changes that reduce the risk of non-communicable diseases and the associated health-related and economic challenges. Incorporating the principles of healthy conversations into all daily interactions provides opportunities for nurses collectively to promote health on an individual basis to millions of people. However, many nurses have not received training in such behaviour change interventions. This article explains the principles and potential benefits of healthy conversations, and emphasises the importance of training to promote nurses' knowledge, skills, confidence and motivation to engage in such conversations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Mills
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, England
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Elvén M, Holmström IK, Carlestav M, Edelbring S. A tension between surrendering and being involved: An interview study on person-centeredness in clinical reasoning in the acute stroke setting. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 112:107718. [PMID: 37001485 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore how stroke survivors experience and prefer to participate in clinical reasoning processes in the acute phase of stroke care. METHODS An explorative qualitative design was used. Individual interviews were conducted with 11 stroke survivors in the acute phase of care and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS The analysis identified five themes: What's going on with me?; Being a recipient of care and treatment; The need to be supported to participate; To be seen and strengthened; and Collaboration and joint understanding. CONCLUSION Stroke survivors experience many attributes of person-centeredness in the acute phase of care but, according to their stories, their participation in clinical reasoning can be further supported. The tension between surrendering and the desire to be more actively involved in the care needs to be considered to facilitate participation in clinical reasoning. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Stroke survivors' participation in clinical reasoning in the acute phase can be facilitated by health professionals noticing signs prompting a shift towards increased willingness to participate. Furthermore, health professionals need to take an active role, sharing their expertise and inviting the stroke survivors to share their perspective. The findings can contribute to further develop person-centered care in acute settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Elvén
- School of Health, Care, and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden; School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
| | - Inger K Holmström
- School of Health, Care, and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden; Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Malin Carlestav
- Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Samuel Edelbring
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gustavsson K, van Diepen C, Fors A, Axelsson M, Bertilsson M, Hensing G. Healthcare professionals' experiences of job satisfaction when providing person-centred care: a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e071178. [PMID: 37295826 PMCID: PMC10277035 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This qualitative systematic review aimed to explore and synthesise healthcare professionals' (HCPs) experiences of job satisfaction when providing person-centred care (PCC) in healthcare settings in Europe. METHOD This systematic review of qualitative studies was followed by a thematic synthesis applying an inductive approach. Studies concerning HCPs and different levels of healthcare in Europe were eligible for inclusion. The CINAHL, PubMed and Scopus databases were searched. Study titles, abstracts and full texts were screened for relevance. Included studies were assessed for methodological quality using a quality appraisal checklist. Data were extracted and synthesised via thematic synthesis, generating analytical themes. RESULTS Seventeen studies were included in the final thematic synthesis, and eight analytical themes were derived. Most studies were conducted in Sweden and the UK and were performed in hospitals, nursing homes, elderly care and primary care. Thirteen of these studies were qualitative and four used a mixed-method design in which the qualitative part was used for analysis. HCPs experienced challenges adapting to a new remoulded professional role and felt torn and inadequate due to ambiguities between organisational structures, task-oriented care and PCC. Improved job satisfaction was experienced when providing PCC in line with ethical expectations, patients and colleagues expressed appreciation and team collaboration improved, while learning new skills generated motivation. CONCLUSION This systematic review found varied experiences among HCPs. Notably, the new professional role was experienced to entail disorientation and uncertainty; importantly, it also entailed experiences of job satisfaction such as meaningfulness, an improved relationship between HCPs and patients, appreciation and collaboration. To facilitate PCC implementation, healthcare organisations should focus on supporting HCPs through collaborational structures, and resources such as time, space and staffing. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022304732.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cornelia van Diepen
- Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andreas Fors
- Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Region Västra Götaland, Research, Education, Development and Innovation, Primary Health Care, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Malin Axelsson
- Department of Care Science, Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Monica Bertilsson
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Gunnel Hensing
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liu W, Hu M, Chen W. Identifying the Service Capability of Long-Term Care Facilities in China: An e-Delphi Study. Front Public Health 2022; 10:884514. [PMID: 35844860 PMCID: PMC9277176 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.884514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This study develops a group of service capability indicators for long-term care facilities to assess their current conditions and makes it the first step toward the improvement of service capability in China. Methods We constructed an initial indicator framework based on the characteristics of long-term care services and a literature review. Potential indicators were collected, and a 2-round modified web-based Delphi process was conducted by a national multidisciplinary expert panel to construct a service capability evaluation index system. The accepted competencies of indicators were established with mean scores in all three scoring criteria (importance, feasibility, and sensitivity) ≥ 4.0, consensus rate reached 70.0%, and a coefficient of variation ≤ 0.25. Results A new indicator framework covering 2 dimensions of inputs and activities was developed in this study. The initial 35 indicators formed an indicator pool for the Delphi questionnaire. According to the final consensus of the expert panel, the Delphi consultation resulted in an index system comprised 31 tertiary indicators across six subdimensions (i) staffing; (ii) facilities and equipment; (iii) funding; (iv) medical inspection services; (v) health management services; (vi) institutional standard management. Conclusion This study developed a set of indicators suitable for the long-term care system in China and is expected to be applied to measure and improve the service capability of long-term care facilities. In addition, these indicators can be used for comparisons between different LTCFs and provide an evidence basis for the further development of capability assessment tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Liu
- Health Economics Department, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Min Hu
- Health Economics Department, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen Chen
- Health Economics Department, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|