Towards Response ADAptive Radiotherapy for organ preservation for intermediate-risk rectal cancer (preRADAR): protocol of a phase I dose-escalation trial

Early Outcomes of Preoperative Short Course Radiotherapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost and Response-adapted Chemotherapy for Advanced Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Limited evidence exists for dose escalation in neoadjuvant short course radiotherapy (SCRT) for rectal cancer. With enhanced imaging and radiotherapy techniques over the past decades along with the valuable endpoint of pathological complete response (pCR), we believe SCRT with simultaneous integrated boost could potentially provide deeper pathological responses and improve local control.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 2020 and December 2022, locoregional-advanced rectal cancer patients that were treated with neoadjuvant SCRT with simultaneous integrated boost up to 5.5-6Gy per fraction with five daily fractions followed by response-adapted chemotherapy was retrospectively reviewed. The pCR rates, R0 resection rates, tumor downstaging, toxicities, and early pattern of recurrence are reported.

RESULTS

Among the 76 patients, 67 (88%) were able to undergo curative intent surgery. R0 resection was achieved in 99% (n = 66) of patients with pCR rates of 28% (n = 19). Forty-six percent (n = 31) of patients had significant pathological downstaging (ypT2N0) and 55% (n = 37) of patients had both T and N downstaging. Most common grade 3 or above radiotherapy-related side-effects were proctitis, rectal pain, and dermatitis found in 5% (n = 4), 3% (n = 2) and 3% (n = 2) of patients, respectively. Grade 3 or above surgical complications were observed in 15% (n = 10) of patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. With a median follow-up of 27 months, only 6% (n = 4) had local recurrence after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant short course radiotherapy with simultaneous boost for rectal cancer is feasible with no added toxicities. Patients who underwent surgery achieve a high R0 resection and pCR rates. Early data suggest low rates of locoregional recurrence. Further follow-up and research is needed to validate and optimize the dose, method, and schedule of dose escalation.

Efficacy and safety of MR-guided adaptive simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy to primary lesions and positive lymph nodes in the neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomized controlled phase III trial

BACKGROUND

In locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), optimizing neoadjuvant strategies, including the addition of concurrent chemotherapy and dose escalation of radiotherapy, is essential to improve tumor regression and subsequent implementation of anal preservation strategies. Currently, dose escalation studies in rectal cancer have focused on the primary lesions. However, a common source of recurrence in LARC is the metastasis of cancer cells to the proximal lymph nodes. In our trial, we implement simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to both primary lesions and positive lymph nodes in the experimental group based on magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART), which allows for more precise (and consequently intense) targeting while sparing neighboring healthy tissue. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MRgART dose escalation to both primary lesions and positive lymph nodes, in comparison with the conventional radiotherapy of long-course concurrent chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT) group, in the neoadjuvant treatment of LARC.

METHODS

This is a multi-center, randomized, controlled phase III trial (NCT06246344). 128 patients with LARC (cT3-4/N+) will be enrolled. During LCCRT, patients will be randomized to receive either MRgART with SIB (60-65 Gy in 25-28 fractions to primary lesions and positive lymph nodes; 50-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions to the pelvis) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (50-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions). Both groups will receive concurrent chemotherapy with capecitabine and consolidation chemotherapy of either two cycles of CAPEOX or three cycles of FOLFOX between radiotherapy and surgery. The primary endpoints are pathological complete response (pCR) rate and surgical difficulty, while the secondary endpoints are clinical complete response (cCR) rate, 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates, acute and late toxicity and quality of life.

DISCUSSION

Since dose escalation of both primary lesions and positive nodes in LARC is rare, we propose conducting a phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SIB for both primary lesions and positive nodes in LARC based on MRgART.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the Identifier: NCT06246344 (Registered 7th Feb 2024).

Quality of life and clinical outcomes in rectal cancer patients treated on a 1.5T MR-Linac within the MOMENTUM study

Background and purpose

This study assessed quality of life (QoL) and clinical outcomes in rectal cancer patients treated with magnetic resonance (MR) guided short-course radiation therapy (SCRT) on a 1.5 Tesla (T) MR-Linac during the first 12 months after treatment.

Materials and methods

Rectal cancer patients treated with 25 Gy SCRT in five fractions with curative intent in the Netherlands (2019-2022) were identified in MOMENTUM (NCT04075305). Toxicity (CTCAE v5) and QoL (EORTC QLQ-C30 and -CR29) was primarily analyzed in patients without metastatic disease (M0) and no other therapies after SCRT. Patients who underwent tumor resection were censored from surgery. A generalized linear mixed-model was used to investigate clinically meaningful (≥10) and significant (P < 0.05) QoL changes. Clinical and pathological complete response (cCR and pCR) rates were calculated in patients in whom response was documented.

Results

A total of 172 patients were included, of whom 112 patients were primarily analyzed. Acute and late radiation-induced high-grade toxicity were reported in one patient, respectively. CCR was observed in 8/64 patients (13 %), 14/37 patients (38 %) and 13/16 patients (91 %) at three, six and twelve months; pCR was observed in 3/69 (4 %) patients. After 12 months, diarrhea (mean difference [MD] -17.4 [95 % confidence interval [CI] -31.2 to -3.7]), blood and mucus in stool (MD -31.1 [95 % CI -46.4 to -15.8]), and anxiety (MD -22.4 [95 % CI -34.0 to -10.9]) were improved.

Conclusion

High-field MR-guided SCRT for the treatment of patients with rectal cancer is associated with improved disease-related symptom management and functioning one year after treatment.

Which tumour factors preclude organ preservation in patients with rectal cancer?

BACKGROUND

cT3cdT4, cN2, mesorectal nodes > 8 mm, clinically positive lateral nodes, extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) and mesorectal fascia threatening (MRF+) have been utilized as exclusion criteria in several studies on the watch-and-wait (w&w) strategy. Here, our aim was to validate these criteria through a post hoc analysis of two pooled prospective studies on w&w following routine radio(chemo)therapy.

METHODS

A review of baseline magnetic resonance imaging was performed in a subgroup of 223 patients treated at a single institution. Of these, 17.9 % started w&w, 12.6 % achieved clinical complete response (cCR) and 9.0 % sustained cCR during median follow-up of 54 months.

RESULTS

The multivariable logistic analysis showed that the proportion of circumferential bowel involvement and EMVI significantly influenced the chance of sustained cCR; odds ratios were 0.063 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.008-0.489, p = 0.008), and 0.109 (95 % CI 0.014-0.850, p = 0.034), respectively. Sustained cCR was observed in none of the 57 patients with 90 %-100 % circumferential bowel involvement and in only one of the 89 patients with EMVI. In contrast, cT3cdT4, cN2, mesorectal nodes > 8 mm, clinically positive lateral nodes or MRF+ were not independently associated with sustained cCR. Among the subgroups of patients with these features but without (near-)circular tumour or EMVI+, sustained cCR was observed in 12 %-25 % of patients.

CONCLUSION

Sustained cCR after routine preoperative radio(chemo)therapy is unlikely in patients with (near-)circular tumour or EMVI, whereas patients with cT3cdT4, cN2, mesorectal nodes > 8 mm, clinically positive lateral nodes and MRF+ should not be denied w&w.

Flash Therapy for Cancer: A Potentially New Radiotherapy Methodology

In traditional treatment modalities and standard clinical practices, FLASH radiotherapy (FL-RT) administers radiation therapy at an exceptionally high dosage rate. When compared to standard dose rate radiation therapy, numerous preclinical investigations have demonstrated that FL-RT provides similar benefits in conserving normal tissue while maintaining equal antitumor efficacy, a phenomenon possible due to the 'FLASH effect' (FE) of FL-RT. The methodologies involve proton radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiation treatment, and managing high-throughput damage by radiation to solid tissues. Recent results from animal studies indicate that FL-RT can reduce radiation-induced tissue damage, significantly enhancing anticancer potency. Focusing on the potential benefits of FL proton beam treatment in the years to come, this review details the FL-RT research that has been done so far and the existing theories illuminating the FL effects. This subject remains of interest, with many issues still needing to be answered. We offer a brief review to emphasize a few of the key efforts and difficulties in moving FL radiation research forward. The existing research state of FL-RT, its affecting variables, and its different specific impacts are presented in this current review. Key topics discussed include the biochemical mechanism during FL therapy, beam sources for FL therapy, the FL effect on immunity, clinical and preclinical studies on the protective effect of FL therapy, and parameters for effective FL therapy.