1
|
Dihan Q, Chauhan MZ, Eleiwa TK, Hassan AK, Sallam AB, Khouri AS, Chang TC, Elhusseiny AM. Using Large Language Models to Generate Educational Materials on Childhood Glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2024; 265:28-38. [PMID: 38614196 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the quality, readability, and accuracy of large language model (LLM)-generated patient education materials (PEMs) on childhood glaucoma, and their ability to improve existing the readability of online information. DESIGN Cross-sectional comparative study. METHODS We evaluated responses of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and Bard to 3 separate prompts requesting that they write PEMs on "childhood glaucoma." Prompt A required PEMs be "easily understandable by the average American." Prompt B required that PEMs be written "at a 6th-grade level using Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) readability formula." We then compared responses' quality (DISCERN questionnaire, Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool [PEMAT]), readability (SMOG, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level [FKGL]), and accuracy (Likert Misinformation scale). To assess the improvement of readability for existing online information, Prompt C requested that LLM rewrite 20 resources from a Google search of keyword "childhood glaucoma" to the American Medical Association-recommended "6th-grade level." Rewrites were compared on key metrics such as readability, complex words (≥3 syllables), and sentence count. RESULTS All 3 LLMs generated PEMs that were of high quality, understandability, and accuracy (DISCERN ≥4, ≥70% PEMAT understandability, Misinformation score = 1). Prompt B responses were more readable than Prompt A responses for all 3 LLM (P ≤ .001). ChatGPT-4 generated the most readable PEMs compared to ChatGPT-3.5 and Bard (P ≤ .001). Although Prompt C responses showed consistent reduction of mean SMOG and FKGL scores, only ChatGPT-4 achieved the specified 6th-grade reading level (4.8 ± 0.8 and 3.7 ± 1.9, respectively). CONCLUSIONS LLMs can serve as strong supplemental tools in generating high-quality, accurate, and novel PEMs, and improving the readability of existing PEMs on childhood glaucoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qais Dihan
- Chicago Medical School (Q.D.), Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois, USA; Department of Ophthalmology (Q.D., M.Z.C., A.B.S., A.M.E.), Harvey and Bernice Jones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Muhammad Z Chauhan
- Department of Ophthalmology (Q.D., M.Z.C., A.B.S., A.M.E.), Harvey and Bernice Jones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Taher K Eleiwa
- Department of Ophthalmology (T.K.E.), Benha Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt
| | - Amr K Hassan
- Department of Ophthalmology (A.K.H.), Faculty of Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt
| | - Ahmed B Sallam
- Department of Ophthalmology (Q.D., M.Z.C., A.B.S., A.M.E.), Harvey and Bernice Jones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA; Department of Ophthalmology (A.B.S.), Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Albert S Khouri
- Institute of Ophthalmology & Visual Science (A.S.K.), Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Ta C Chang
- Department of Ophthalmology (T.C.C.), Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Abdelrahman M Elhusseiny
- Department of Ophthalmology (Q.D., M.Z.C., A.B.S., A.M.E.), Harvey and Bernice Jones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA; Department of Ophthalmology (A.M.E.), Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Galvez-Olortegui J, Bouchikh-El Jarroudi R, Silva-Ocas I, Palacios-Herrera H, Cubillas-Martin M, Zavaleta-Mercado M, Burgueño-Montañes C, Galvez-Olortegui T. Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of retinal vein occlusion. Eye (Lond) 2024; 38:1722-1733. [PMID: 38467863 PMCID: PMC11156943 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-024-03008-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES To assess the methodological quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) for the diagnosis and management of Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO). METHODS A systematic review of CPGs for the diagnosis and management of RVO was carried out with a search in databases, metasearch engines, CPG development institutions, ophthalmology associations and CPG repositories until April 2022. Search update was performed on April 2023, with no new record available. Five CPGs published in the last 10 years in English/Spanish were selected, and 5 authors evaluated them independently, using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE-II) instrument. An individual assessment of each CPG by domain (AGREE-II), an overall assessment of the guide, and its use with or without modifications were performed. Additionally, a meta-synthesis of the recommendations for the most relevant outcomes was carried out. RESULTS The lowest score (mean 18.8%) was for domain 5 'applicability', and the highest score (mean 62%) was for domain 4 'clarity of presentation'. The 2019 American guideline (PPP) presented the best score (40.4%) in domain 3 'rigour of development'. When evaluating the overall quality of the CPGs analysed, all CPGs could be recommended with modifications. In the meta-synthesis, anti-VEGF therapy is the first-choice therapy for macular oedema associated with RVO, but there is no clear recommendation about the type of anti-VEGF therapy to choose. Recommendations for diagnosis and follow-up are similar among the CPGs appraised. CONCLUSION Most CPGs for the diagnosis and management of RVO have a low methodological quality assessed according to the AGREE-II. PPP has the higher score in the domain 'rigour of development'. Among the CPGs appraised, there is no clear recommendation on the type of anti-VEGF therapy to choose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Galvez-Olortegui
- Evidence Based Ophthalmology Unit (Oftalmoevidencia), Scientia Clinical and Epidemiological Research Institute, Trujillo, Peru.
- Service of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
- Universidad Nacional de Tumbes, Tumbes, Peru.
| | - Rachid Bouchikh-El Jarroudi
- Evidence Based Ophthalmology Unit (Oftalmoevidencia), Scientia Clinical and Epidemiological Research Institute, Trujillo, Peru
- Service of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Isabel Silva-Ocas
- Evidence Based Ophthalmology Unit (Oftalmoevidencia), Scientia Clinical and Epidemiological Research Institute, Trujillo, Peru
- Centro de Excelencia en Glaucoma, Clinica GO-Vision, Lima, Peru
| | - Hector Palacios-Herrera
- Evidence Based Ophthalmology Unit (Oftalmoevidencia), Scientia Clinical and Epidemiological Research Institute, Trujillo, Peru
- Servicio de Retina y Vitreo, EP Oftalmólogos asociados, Lima, Peru
| | | | - Miguel Zavaleta-Mercado
- Evidence Based Ophthalmology Unit (Oftalmoevidencia), Scientia Clinical and Epidemiological Research Institute, Trujillo, Peru
- Instituto de Investigaciones Oftalmológicas y Ciencias Visuales Avanzadas Zavaleta Mercado (Innovaz), Oruro, Bolivia
| | - Carmen Burgueño-Montañes
- Evidence Based Ophthalmology Unit (Oftalmoevidencia), Scientia Clinical and Epidemiological Research Institute, Trujillo, Peru
- Service of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Tomas Galvez-Olortegui
- Evidence Based Ophthalmology Unit (Oftalmoevidencia), Scientia Clinical and Epidemiological Research Institute, Trujillo, Peru
- Centro de Excelencia en Glaucoma, Clinica GO-Vision, Lima, Peru
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, Lima, Peru
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Haines C, Chakraborty R, Kho K, Henman J, Mansouri N, Anstice NS. Critical appraisal of Australian and New Zealand paediatric vision screening clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE II tool. Clin Exp Optom 2024:1-8. [PMID: 38714343 DOI: 10.1080/08164622.2024.2339276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024] Open
Abstract
CLINICAL RELEVANCE Vision disorders in children impact health-related quality of life, with early detection and intervention improving outcomes and educational performance. Eye health professionals should be aware of paediatric vision screening guidelines and their development to understand the components of local programmes and the differences in sensitivity and specificity between protocols. BACKGROUND High-quality clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for vision screening enable the early detection of common vision disorders; however, they require rigorous development to ensure optimal accuracy in detecting vision disorders, enabling timely interventions. This study evaluated the quality of available vision screening CPGs on vision screening of children in Australia and New Zealand. METHODS A systematic search of academic databases, guideline databases, professional associations and Google search engines was conducted to identify relevant paediatric vision screening CPGs. Four independent reviewers used the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument to assess the quality of individual guidelines and scores were aggregated and reported as the percentage of the total possible score across the six AGREE II domains: scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigour of development, clarity of presentation, applicability, and editorial independence. RESULTS Initial 2,999 items were evaluated, with seven guidelines included. AGREE-II quality score agreement ranged from 43.3% to 95.8%. All guidelines scored >60.0% in the scope and purpose, however, most had poor scores of <26.5% in the rigour of development and <3.3% in editorial independence domains. All guidelines recommended screening using measures of habitual distance vision. CONCLUSION Of the guidelines developed for use in Australia and New Zealand, most guidelines scored poorly when assessed against the AGREE II tool, because of lack of editorial independence and rigour of development. Paediatric vision screening guidelines should prioritise systematic review of literature to inform practice and include statements regarding competing interests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cassandra Haines
- Caring Futures Institute, Optometry and Vision Science, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia
| | - Ranjay Chakraborty
- Caring Futures Institute, Optometry and Vision Science, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia
| | - Kyden Kho
- Caring Futures Institute, Optometry and Vision Science, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia
| | - Jessica Henman
- Caring Futures Institute, Optometry and Vision Science, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia
| | | | - Nicola S Anstice
- Caring Futures Institute, Optometry and Vision Science, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Oatts JT, Shen S, Zhu H, Gong Q, Yu Y, Ying GS, Han Y, Liu H. A Prospective Study of the Effects of General Anesthesia on Intraocular Pressure in Healthy Children. OPHTHALMOLOGY SCIENCE 2024; 4:100455. [PMID: 38313401 PMCID: PMC10837640 DOI: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
Purpose To determine the effect of general anesthesia on intraocular pressure (IOP) in children with no intraocular pathology and determine which postanesthetic time point is most predictive of preinduction IOP. Design Prospective observational study. Participants Children with no intraocular pathology ≤ 18 years scheduled for general anesthesia as part of their routine care followed by a pediatric ophthalmologist at Nanjing Medical University. Methods Participants underwent a standardized general anesthetic protocol using a mask induction with sevoflurane and propofol maintenance. Intraocular pressure was measured at the following 7 time points: preinduction (taken in the preoperative area), postinduction minutes 1, 3, and 5, and postairway placement minutes 1, 3, and 5 for a total time period of 10 minutes after induction. A generalized estimating equation was used to evaluate the effect of anesthesia on IOP and the effect of patient factors (age, gender, vital signs, and airway type) on preanesthetic and postanesthetic IOP. An IOP prediction model was developed using the postanesthesia IOP measurements for predicting preinduction IOP. Main Outcome Measures Intraocular pressure and change in IOP at prespecified time points. Results Eighty-five children were enrolled with a mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of 7.5 ± 2.9 years. Mean ± SD preinduction IOP was 20.1 ± 3.7 mmHg. Overall, IOP was lowest at 3 minutes postinduction, decreased to a mean of 13.4 ± 3.7 mmHg (P < 0.001). After this, IOP rose 5 minutes postinduction to 16.5 ± 4.2 mmHg, which did not reach preinduction IOP levels (P < 0.001). The IOP prediction model showed that combining 1 minute postinduction and 3 minutes postairway was most predictive (R2 = 0.13), whereas 1 minute postairway was least predictive of preinduction IOP (R2 = 0.01). Conclusions After the induction of general anesthesia in children, IOP temporarily decreases with a trough at 3 minutes postinduction before increasing and remaining stable just below preinduction levels. Intraocular pressure measurements taken 1 minute after induction with 3 minutes after airway placement are most predictive of preinduction IOP, though predictive value is relatively low. Financial Disclosures Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julius T. Oatts
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Shiya Shen
- Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Hui Zhu
- Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Qi Gong
- Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yinxi Yu
- Center for Preventive Ophthalmology and Biostatistics, Department of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Gui-shuang Ying
- Center for Preventive Ophthalmology and Biostatistics, Department of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ying Han
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Hu Liu
- Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kesav NP, Kim S, Chiang TK, Matta M, Honda K, Kurup SK. Tattoo-Induced Exacerbations of Systemic Disease and Uveitis. JOURNAL OF VITREORETINAL DISEASES 2024; 8:339-342. [PMID: 38770085 PMCID: PMC11102725 DOI: 10.1177/24741264241233384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
Purpose: To examine an underreported and underdiagnosed phenomenon with implications for the pathophysiological mechanisms of tattoo-induced uveitis. Methods: Two cases highlighting the clinical presentation of tattoo-related uveitis were evaluated. Results: A 28-year-old man with biopsy-proven sarcoidosis and ocular manifestations presented with worsening retinal vasculitis after acquiring a red-ink tattoo. Each subsequent flare followed acquisition of a new tattoo. A 31-year-old woman without systemic sarcoidosis presented with multiple episodes of bilateral intermediate uveitis and macular edema concurrent with inflammatory granulomas to recently acquired black-ink tattoos. A skin biopsy in both patients showed cutaneous noncaseating granulomas. Conclusions: These cases add to those reported in the literature and emphasize the importance of understanding the modifiable factors of inflammatory ocular disease. Future study is necessary to understand the mechanisms of tattoo-related uveitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha P. Kesav
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Suzie Kim
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Tsun-Kang Chiang
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Maroun Matta
- Department of Pulmonary, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kord Honda
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Shree K. Kurup
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kumar A, Han Y, Oatts JT. Genetic changes and testing associated with childhood glaucoma: A systematic review. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0298883. [PMID: 38386645 PMCID: PMC10883561 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Many forms of childhood glaucoma have been associated with underlying genetic changes, and variants in many genes have been described. Currently, testing is variable as there are no widely accepted guidelines for testing. This systematic review aimed to summarize the literature describing genetic changes and testing practices in childhood glaucoma. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines and registered with Prospero (ID CRD42023400467). A comprehensive review of Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed from inception through March 2, 2023 using the search terms: (glaucoma) AND (pediatric OR childhood OR congenital OR child OR infant OR infantile) AND (gene OR genetic OR genotype OR locus OR genomic OR mutation OR variant OR test OR screen OR panel). Information was extracted regarding genetic variants including genotype-phenotype correlation. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Of 1,916 records screened, 196 studies met inclusion criteria and 53 genes were discussed. Among study populations, mean age±SD at glaucoma diagnosis was 8.94±9.54 years and 50.4% were male. The most common gene discussed was CYP1B1, evaluated in 109 (55.6%) studies. CYP1B1 variants were associated with region and population-specific prevalence ranging from 5% to 86% among those with primary congenital glaucoma. MYOC variants were discussed in 31 (15.8%) studies with prevalence up to 36% among patients with juvenile open angle glaucoma. FOXC1 variants were discussed in 25 (12.8%) studies, which demonstrated phenotypic severity dependent on degree of gene expression and type of mutation. Overall risk of bias was low; the most common domains of bias were selection and comparability. Numerous genes and genetic changes have been associated with childhood glaucoma. Understanding the most common genes as well as potential genotype-phenotype correlation has the potential to improve diagnostic and prognostic outcomes for children with glaucoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anika Kumar
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Ying Han
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Julius T. Oatts
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Elhusseiny AM, Hassan AK, Azhari JO, Elkheniny FD, Chauhan MZ, Chang TC, VanderVeen DK, Oke I, Mansour M, Pakravan M, Shaarawy T, Sallam AB. Ahmed and Baerveldt Glaucoma Drainage Devices in Childhood Glaucoma: A Meta-Analysis. J Glaucoma 2023; 32:686-694. [PMID: 37172011 DOI: 10.1097/ijg.0000000000002235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/30/2023] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
PRCIS The effectiveness of Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) and Baerveldt glaucoma implant (BGI) was comparable in the management of childhood glaucoma over the long term despite initial better success rate with BGI. There were higher tube block and retraction rates in the BGI group and higher tube exposure rates in the AGV group. PURPOSE To evaluate the outcomes and safety of AGV and BGI in childhood glaucoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a systematic literature review of publications from 1990 to 2022 in PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and google scholar for studies evaluating AGV and BGI in childhood glaucoma. Primary outcome measures were intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction and glaucoma medication reduction. The secondary outcome measures were the success rates and incidence of postoperative complications. We conducted a meta-analysis using a random effects model. RESULTS Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1480 eyes were included. The mean IOP reduction was 15.08 mm Hg ( P < 0.00001) for AGV and 14.62 ( P < 0.00001) for the BGI group. The mean difference between pre and postoperative glaucoma medications was 1 ( P < 0.00001) fewer medications in the AGV group and 0.95 ( P < 0.0001) fewer medications in the BGI group. There was a lower success rate in the AGV versus BGI groups at 2 years [63% vs 83%, respectively ( P < 0.0001) and 3 years (43% vs 79%, respectively ( P < 0.0001)]; however, the success was higher for AGV at 5 years (63% vs 56% in the BGI group, P < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications was comparable in the AGV and BGI groups, with rates of 28% and 27%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The IOP and glaucoma medication reduction, success rates, and incidence of postoperative complications were comparable in Ahmed and Baerveldt groups. Most literature comes from retrospective low-quality studies on refractory childhood glaucoma. Further larger cohort studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdelrahman M Elhusseiny
- Department of Ophthalmology, Harvey and Bernice Jones Eye Institute
- Department of Ophthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Amr K Hassan
- Department of Ophthalmology, South Valley University, Qena
| | - Jamal O Azhari
- Department of Ophthalmology, Harvey and Bernice Jones Eye Institute
| | | | | | - Ta C Chang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| | - Deborah K VanderVeen
- Department of Ophthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Isdin Oke
- Department of Ophthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Munthir Mansour
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | | | - Tarek Shaarawy
- Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ahmed B Sallam
- Department of Ophthalmology, Harvey and Bernice Jones Eye Institute
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lam M, Suh D. Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Pediatric Ocular Diseases. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 9:children9121939. [PMID: 36553382 PMCID: PMC9777216 DOI: 10.3390/children9121939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Vision is an important aspect of a child's quality of life and intellectual, social, and emotional development. Disruptions to vision during infancy and early childhood can cause lifelong vision impairment or blindness. However, early identification and treatment of eye disease can prevent loss of sight and its consequent long-term effects. Therefore, screening guidelines exist to guide physicians in detecting the most common threats to sight in the different stages of infancy and childhood. This review describes common causes of pediatric vision impairment, the recommended screening guidelines for diagnosing them, and current treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Lam
- Creighton University School of Medicine Phoenix Regional Campus, Phoenix, AZ 85012, USA
| | - Donny Suh
- Gavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Keel S, Lingham G, Misra N, Block S, Bourne R, Calonge M, Cheng CY, Friedman DS, Furtado JM, Khanna R, Mariotti S, Mathenge W, Matoto E, Müeller A, Rabiu M, Rasengane T, Resnikoff S, Wormald R, Yasmin S, Zhao J, Evans JR, Cieza A, Chan VF, Chen Y, Chinnery H, Dodson S, Downie L, Gordon I, Ghadiri N, Govender Poonsamy P, Han X, Hui F, Jackson ML, Lawrenson J, Ning Lee C, McGuinness M, Murray C, Newsham D, van Nispen R, Prictor M, Puri L, Ramke J, Reekie I, Safi S, Scheetz J, Shen S, Silveira S, Thakur S, Virgili G, Yong AC, Zhang J, Ziaei M, Ali MA, AlObaida IA, AlShamlan FT, Alsulaiman SM, Amissah-Arthur KN, Ang M, Azad R, Bell K, Bharadwaj SR, Booysen DJ, Branchevski S, Bosch V, Brossard-Barbosa N, Chen Y, Craig JP, Dada T, Dichoso CA, Duerksen R, Ebri A, Erdmann I, Freddo T, Flanagan J, Gammoh Y, Gupta N, Hendicott P, Husni MA, Jonathan Jackson A, Jadoon MZ, Januleviciene I, Jeeva I, Jimenez MSS, Kocur I, Kreis A, Kyei S, Lan W, Loy MJV, Marmamula S, Minto LH, Muhit M, Nsubuga NH, Ogundipe A, Okonkwo ON, Olawoye OO, Ouertani AM, Ovenseri-Ogbomo G, Özkan SB, Patel B, Paula JS, Rahi JS, Ravilla RD, Senanayake NS, Sil AK, Solebo AL, Sousa RARC, Tennant MTS, van Staden DB, Wazir JF, Webber AL, Yorston D, Zin A, Faal HB, Keeffe J, McGrath CE. Toward Universal Eye Health Coverage-Key Outcomes of the World Health Organization Package of Eye Care Interventions: A Systematic Review. JAMA Ophthalmol 2022; 140:1229-1238. [PMID: 36394836 DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.4716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Importance Despite persistent inequalities in access to eye care services globally, guidance on a set of recommended, evidence-based eye care interventions to support country health care planning has not been available. To overcome this barrier, the World Health Organization (WHO) Package of Eye Care Interventions (PECI) has been developed. Objective To describe the key outcomes of the PECI development. Evidence Review A standardized stepwise approach that included the following stages: (1) selection of priority eye conditions by an expert panel after reviewing epidemiological evidence and health facility data; (2) identification of interventions and related evidence for the selected eye conditions from a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs); stage 2 included a systematic literature search, screening of title and abstracts (excluding articles that were not relevant CPGs), full-text review to assess disclosure of conflicts of interest and affiliations, quality appraisal, and data extraction; (3) expert review of the evidence extracted in stage 2, identification of missed interventions, and agreement on the inclusion of essential interventions suitable for implementation in low- and middle-income resource settings; and (4) peer review. Findings Fifteen priority eye conditions were chosen. The literature search identified 3601 articles. Of these, 469 passed title and abstract screening, 151 passed full-text screening, 98 passed quality appraisal, and 87 were selected for data extraction. Little evidence (≤1 CPG identified) was available for pterygium, keratoconus, congenital eyelid disorders, vision rehabilitation, myopic macular degeneration, ptosis, entropion, and ectropion. In stage 3, domain-specific expert groups voted to include 135 interventions (57%) of a potential 235 interventions collated from stage 2. After synthesis across all interventions and eye conditions, 64 interventions (13 health promotion and education, 6 screening and prevention, 38 treatment, and 7 rehabilitation) were included in the PECI. Conclusions and Relevance This systematic review of CPGs for priority eye conditions, followed by an expert consensus procedure, identified 64 essential, evidence-based, eye care interventions that are required to achieve universal eye health coverage. The review identified some important gaps, including a paucity of high-quality, English-language CPGs, for several eye diseases and a dearth of evidence-based recommendations on eye health promotion and prevention within existing CPGs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart Keel
- Department of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Gareth Lingham
- Centre for Eye Research Ireland, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science (incorporating Lions Eye Institute), University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Neha Misra
- Department of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Rupert Bourne
- Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom.,Vision & Eye Research Institute, School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Margarita Calonge
- Institute of Applied OphthalmoBiology, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.,CIBER-BBN (Biomedical Research Networking Center Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine), Carlos III National Institute of Health, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Ching-Yu Cheng
- Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore
| | | | - João M Furtado
- Division of Ophthalmology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Rohit Khanna
- Allen Foster Community Eye Health Research Centre, Gullapalli Pratibha Rao International Centre for Advancement of Rural Eye Care, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India
| | - Silvio Mariotti
- Department of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Andreas Müeller
- Department of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Mansur Rabiu
- Noor Dubai Foundation, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Tuwani Rasengane
- Department of Optometry, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.,Universitas Hospital, Bloemfontein, South Africa
| | - Serge Resnikoff
- School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.,Brien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.,Organisation pour la Prévention de la Cécité, Paris, France
| | - Richard Wormald
- International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.,UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.,Cochrane Eyes and Vision, Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | | | - Jialiang Zhao
- Department of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Eye Research Center Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jennifer R Evans
- International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.,Cochrane Eyes and Vision, Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Alarcos Cieza
- Department of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Ving Fai Chan
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Yanxian Chen
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Holly Chinnery
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Sarity Dodson
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Laura Downie
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Iris Gordon
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Nima Ghadiri
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | | | - Xiaotong Han
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Flora Hui
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | | | - John Lawrenson
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Chan Ning Lee
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | | | - Craig Murray
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - David Newsham
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | | | - Megan Prictor
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Lila Puri
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | | | - Ian Reekie
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Sare Safi
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Jane Scheetz
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Sunny Shen
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Sue Silveira
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Sahil Thakur
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Gianni Virgili
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Ai Chee Yong
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Justine Zhang
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Mohammed Ziaei
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Marcus Ang
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | | | - Kristin Bell
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | | | - Dirk J Booysen
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | | | - Vanessa Bosch
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | | | - Yi Chen
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | | | - Tanuj Dada
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | | | | | - Anne Ebri
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Irmela Erdmann
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Thomas Freddo
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - John Flanagan
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Yazan Gammoh
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Neeru Gupta
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Irfan Jeeva
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | | | - Ivo Kocur
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Andreas Kreis
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Samuel Kyei
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Weizhong Lan
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | | | | | | | - Mohammad Muhit
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Seyhan B Özkan
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Bina Patel
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Jayter S Paula
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Jugnoo S Rahi
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | | | | | - Asim Kumar Sil
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | | | - Raúl ARC Sousa
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | | | | | | | - Ann L Webber
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - David Yorston
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Andrea Zin
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Hannah B Faal
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | - Jill Keeffe
- for the Package of Eye Care Interventions Development Group
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Khizer MA, Khan TA, Ijaz U, Khan S, Rehmatullah AK, Zahid I, Shah HG, Zahid MA, Sarfaraz H, Khurshid N. Personal Computer-Based Visual Field Testing as an Alternative to Standard Automated Perimetry. Cureus 2022; 14:e32094. [PMID: 36601199 PMCID: PMC9804030 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Standard automated perimetry (SAP) is the gold standard of visual field assessment in patients with neuro-ophthalmic conditions. Glaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy characterized by damage to the ganglion cell complex with corresponding visual field defects and intraocular pressure (IOP) being the only modifiable ocular risk factor. Recent advances in technology have paved the way for remote screening and monitoring of visual field defects with the aid of a computer or tablet-based software. One such personal computer (PC)-based software is 'Specvis', which has shown promising reliability as compared to SAP. The primary objective of this study was to compare Specvis and Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) visual field reports in the graphical domain while secondary objectives were to estimate the ease of use of Specvis in comparison to HFA and comparison of test duration between Specvis and HFA. Materials and methods This was a cross-sectional validation study performed at a tertiary care ophthalmology institute in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Subjects presenting to the outpatient department were recruited based on consecutive sampling technique and were divided into healthy and diseased groups. Basic data collection instrument after informed consent was filled with demographic data, ophthalmic data, disease condition, and attached with analysis reports of both HFA and Specvis for assessment by three senior ophthalmology consultants independently. A total of 218 eyes of 109 subjects were included in this pilot study. SAP was done on the VF 30-2 program using HFA 3. The same patient then performed the visual field assessment on a PC with Specvis installed and settings adjusted to match the VF 30-2 program of HFA as closely as possible. Visual fields of a subject obtained from HFA and Specvis were then coupled and sent to three different senior ophthalmologists. The assessment was done by comparing the greyscale visual field printouts in the graphical domain and scored based on a 5-point Likert scale which were then analyzed for inter-observer reliability. After each test, all subjects were asked to rate the difficulty level of performing the test on HFA and Specvis based on a 5-point Likert scale. The duration of the test performed on HFA and Specvis was also noted for comparison. Results We observed male preponderance in our study participants (n=128, 58.72%). The majority of the participants were non-diseased (n=170, 77.98%) while advanced glaucoma was the commonest disease in the diseased group (n = 22, 10.09%). The mean age of the participants was 40.71 (SD=15.24). The observations for the HFA test duration had an average of 213.33 seconds (SD=33.49, Min=174.00, Max=314.00) while the Specvis test duration had an average of 267.36 seconds (SD=35.98, Min=228.00, Max=370.00). A significant positive correlation was observed between score 1, score 2, and score 3 given by the three ophthalmologists. A significant negative correlation was observed between ease of using HFA and age, with a correlation of -.28. A significant negative correlation was also observed between ease of using Specvis and age. Conclusion Specvis, a computer-based free open-source software used in our study, can give promising results in diagnosing as well as monitoring the progression of visual field defects. It can act as a significantly cost-effective and readily available bridge between visual field examination by confrontation method and SAP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad A Khizer
- Ophthalmology, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, PAK
- Ophthalmology, Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology, Rawalpindi, PAK
| | - Taimoor A Khan
- Ophthalmology, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, PAK
- Ophthalmology, Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology, Rawalpindi, PAK
| | - Umar Ijaz
- Ophthalmology, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, PAK
- Ophthalmology, Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology, Rawalpindi, PAK
| | - Summaya Khan
- Ophthalmology, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, PAK
- Ophthalmology, Combined Military Hospital, Quetta, PAK
| | | | - Izza Zahid
- Medical Student, James Cook University, Townsville, AUS
| | - Hira G Shah
- Ophthalmology, Alshifa Trust Eye Hospital, Rawalpindi, PAK
| | | | - Haroon Sarfaraz
- Ophthalmology, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, PAK
- Ophthalmology, Wah Medical College, Wah Cantt, PAK
| | - Nawal Khurshid
- Otolaryngology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, PAK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Aboalazayem F, Elhusseiny AM, El Sayed YM. Gonioscopy-Assisted Transluminal Trabeculotomy; A Review. Curr Eye Res 2022; 48:329-338. [PMID: 35634789 DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2022.2084113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
AIM To review the recent evidence in the literature regarding the efficacy and safety of gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) in the management of pediatric and adult glaucoma. METHODS A literature search was performed in the electronic databases of PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase the Register of Controlled Trials, and Ovid Medline for studies evaluating the safety and outcomes of GATT in glaucoma. RESULTS GATT is a novel minimally invasive glaucoma surgery that allows the incision of the inner wall of Schlemm's canal increasing aqueous drainage through the physiologic outflow pathway with subsequent intraocular pressure reduction in different types if of glaucoma. CONCLUSION GATT demonstrated favorable results in a wide range of both primary and secondary open-angle and angle-closure glaucoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fayrouz Aboalazayem
- Department of Ophthalmology, Kasr Al-Ainy Hospitals, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Abdelrahman M. Elhusseiny
- Department of Ophthalmology, Kasr Al-Ainy Hospitals, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
- Department of Ophthalmology, Harvey and Bernice Jones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Yasmine M. El Sayed
- Department of Ophthalmology, Kasr Al-Ainy Hospitals, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|