Anatomy of a successful multimodal hand hygiene campaign

A mixed-methods evaluation of the national implementation of the Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia Prevention by Engaging Nurses (HAPPEN) initiative

OBJECTIVE

To describe healthcare provider, veteran, and organizational barriers to, challenges to, and facilitators of implementation of the oral care Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia Prevention by Engaging Nurses (HAPPEN) initiative to prevent non-ventilator-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia (NV-HAP).

DESIGN

Concurrent mixed methods. Qualitative interviews of staff and patients were conducted in addition to a larger survey of VA employees regarding implementation.

SETTING

Medical surgical or extended care units in 6 high-complexity (01a-c) VA hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Between January 2020 and February 2021, we interviewed 7 staff and 7 veterans, and we received survey responses from 91 staff.

INTERVENTION

Provide education, support, and oral care supplies to prevent NV-HAP.

RESULTS

Barriers to HAPPEN implementation and tracking at the pilot sites included maintaining oral care supplies and completion of oral care documentation. Facilitators for HAPPEN implementation included development of supportive formal and informal nurse leaders, staff engagement, and shared beliefs in the importance of care quality and infection prevention. Nurses worked together as a team to provide consistent oral care. Oral care was viewed as an essential infection control practice (not just "a task") and was considered part of the "culture" and "mission" in caring for veterans.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurse leaders and direct-care staff were engaged throughout HAPPEN implementation, and most reported feeling supported and well prepared as they walked through the steps. Veterans reported positive experiences and increased knowledge about prevention of pneumonia. Lessons learned included building a community of practice and sharing expertise, which led to the successful replication of the HAPPEN initiative nationwide, improving patient safety and care quality and influencing health policy.

Investigation of Acinetobacter baumannii Activity in Vascular Surgery Units through Epidemiological Management Based on the Analysis of Antimicrobial Resistance, Biofilm Formation and Genotyping

Background/Objectives: The genus Acinetobacter demonstrates resistance to antibiotics and has been shown to spread in the hospital environment causing epidemic outbreaks among hospitalized patients. The objectives of the present study was to investigate the antibiotic resistance, biofilm formation, and clonality among Acinetobacter baumannii strains. Materials and Methods: The study involved 6 (I Outbreak) and 3 (II Outbreak) A. baumannii strains isolated from patients hospitalized in vascular surgery unit. Results: All tested A. baumannii strains were extensively drug resistant (XDR) and all the isolates were carbapenem-resistant and among them, all carried the bla_OXA-51 gene, the bla_OXA-24 gene, as well as the bla_OXA-23 gene. All of the investigated strains had the ability to form a biofilm, but all of them produced less biofilm than the reference strain. Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) showed that all strains belonged to the ST2 clone. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) divided the tested outbreak strains into two clones (A and B). Conclusion: This study shows a nosocomial spread of XDR A. baumannii ST2 having the bla_OXA-51 gene, the bla_OXA-24 gene, as well as the bla_OXA-23 gene, low biofilm formers, that was prevalent in the vascular surgery unit. To identify the current situation of vascular surgery departments targeted epidemiological investigation was needed. Effective implementation of infection control prevented the spread of the epidemic outbreaks.

A scoping review to assess the impact of public education campaigns to affect behavior change pertaining to antimicrobial resistance

BACKGROUND

Years of global antibiotic misuse has led to the progression of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), posing a direct threat to public health. To impact AMR and maintain antimicrobial viability, educational interventions toward fostering positive AMR behavior change have been employed with some success.

METHODS

This scoping review sought to identify research-supporting use of public educational AMR campaigns, and their efficacy toward informing positive AMR behaviors to inform current debate. To enable credible and reflexive examination of a wide variety of literature, Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) methodological framework was used.

RESULTS

Three primary themes were identified: (1) behavior change and theoretical underpinnings, (2) intervention paradigm, and (3) educational engagement. From 94 abstracts identified, 31 articles were chosen for review. More attention is required to identify elements of intervention design that inform and sustain behavior change, and the impact of how an intervention is delivered and targeted is needed to limit assumptions of population homogeneity, which potentially limits intervention efficacy. Moreover, research on the impact of hospital-based inpatient interventions is needed.

CONCLUSIONS

The existing body of research fails to provide robust evidence to support sound evidential interventions supported by theoretical justifications. Furthermore, interventions to ensure long-term sustained behavior change are unclear and not addressed.

Role of Human Factors Engineering in Infection Prevention: Gaps and Opportunities

Human factors engineering (HFE), with its focus on studying how humans interact with systems, including their physical and organizational environment, the tools and technologies they use, and the tasks they perform, provides principles, tools, and techniques for systematically identifying important factors, for analyzing and evaluating how these factors interact to increase or decrease the risk of Healthcare-associated infections (HAI), and for identifying and implementing effective preventive measures. We reviewed the literature on HFE and infection prevention and control and identified major themes to document how researchers and infection prevention staff have used HFE methods to prevent HAIs and to identify gaps in our knowledge about the role of HFE in HAI prevention and control. Our literature review found that most studies in the healthcare domain explicitly applying (HFE) principles and methods addressed patient safety issues not infection prevention and control issues. In addition, most investigators who applied human factors principles and methods to infection prevention issues assessed only one human factors element such as training, technology evaluations, or physical environment design. The most significant gap pertains to the limited use and application of formal HFE tools and methods. Every infection prevention study need not assess all components in a system, but investigators must assess the interaction of critical system components if they want to address latent and deep-rooted human factors problems.

SWITCH: Al Wakra Hospital Journey to 90% Hand Hygiene Practice Compliance, 2011 - 2015

Hand Hygiene is the cheapest and simplest way to prevent the spread of infection, however international compliance is below than 40% (WHO, 2009). In the experience of Al Wakra Hospital, the improvement in hand hygiene compliance highlighted not just interventions towards training and education but also behavioral motivation and physical allocations of hand hygiene appliances and equipment. Through motivating the behavioral, emotional, physical and intellectual dimensions of the different healthcare worker professions, hand hygiene compliance has increased from 60.78% in 2011 to 94.14% by the end of December 2015. It took 25 months of continuous and collaborative work with different healthcare workers to reach the 90% hand hygiene target. "Together, we have reached our goals and together we fight against infections! Because we always strive for excellence in everything we do - that is our vision here in Al Wakra Hospital."

Sustained improvement in hand hygiene adherence: utilizing shared accountability and financial incentives

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of an institutional hand hygiene accountability program on healthcare personnel hand hygiene adherence.

DESIGN

Time-series design with correlation analysis.

SETTING

Tertiary care academic medical center, including outpatient clinics and procedural areas.

PARTICIPANTS

Medical center healthcare personnel.

METHODS

A comprehensive hand hygiene initiative was implemented in 2 major phases starting in July 2009. Key facets of the initiative included extensive project planning, leadership buy-in and goal setting, financial incentives linked to performance, and use of a system-wide shared accountability model. Adherence was measured by designated hand hygiene observers. Adherence rates were compared between baseline and implementation phases, and monthly hand hygiene adherence rates were correlated with monthly rates of device-associated infection.

RESULTS

A total of 109,988 observations were completed during the study period, with a sustained increase in hand hygiene adherence throughout each implementation phase (P < .001) as well as from one phase to the next (P < .001), such that adherence greater than 85% has been achieved since January 2011. Medical center departments were able to reclaim some rebate dollars allocated through a self-insurance trust, but during the study period, departments did not achieve full reimbursement. Hand hygiene adherence rates were inversely correlated with device-associated standardized infection ratios (R(@) = 0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of this multifaceted, observational hand hygiene program was associated with sustained improvement in hand hygiene adherence. The principles of this program could be applied to other medical centers pursuing improved hand hygiene adherence among healthcare personnel.