Inspiratory crackles-early and late-revisited: identifying COPD by crackle characteristics

An Accelerometer-Based Wearable Patch for Robust Respiratory Rate and Wheeze Detection Using Deep Learning

Wheezing is a critical indicator of various respiratory conditions, including asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Current diagnosis relies on subjective lung auscultation by physicians. Enabling this capability via a low-profile, objective wearable device for remote patient monitoring (RPM) could offer pre-emptive, accurate respiratory data to patients. With this goal as our aim, we used a low-profile accelerometer-based wearable system that utilizes deep learning to objectively detect wheezing along with respiration rate using a single sensor. The miniature patch consists of a sensitive wideband MEMS accelerometer and low-noise CMOS interface electronics on a small board, which was then placed on nine conventional lung auscultation sites on the patient's chest walls to capture the pulmonary-induced vibrations (PIVs). A deep learning model was developed and compared with a deterministic time-frequency method to objectively detect wheezing in the PIV signals using data captured from 52 diverse patients with respiratory diseases. The wearable accelerometer patch, paired with the deep learning model, demonstrated high fidelity in capturing and detecting respiratory wheezes and patterns across diverse and pertinent settings. It achieved accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 95%, 96%, and 93%, respectively, with an AUC of 0.99 on the test set-outperforming the deterministic time-frequency approach. Furthermore, the accelerometer patch outperforms the digital stethoscopes in sound analysis while offering immunity to ambient sounds, which not only enhances data quality and performance for computational wheeze detection by a significant margin but also provides a robust sensor solution that can quantify respiration patterns simultaneously.

Constrained Synthetic Sampling for Augmentation of Crackle Lung Sounds

Crackles are explosive breathing patterns caused by lung air sacs filling with fluid and act as an indicator for a plethora of pulmonary diseases. Clinical studies suggest a strong correlation between the presence of these adventitious auscultations and mortality rate, especially in pediatric patients, underscoring the importance of their pathological indication. While clinically important, crackles occur rarely in breathing signals relative to other phases and abnormalities of lung sounds, imposing a considerable class imbalance in developing learning methodologies for automated tracking and diagnosis of lung pathologies. The scarcity and clinical relevance of crackle sounds compel a need for exploring data augmentation techniques to enrich the space of crackle signals. Given their unique nature, the current study proposes a crackle-specific constrained synthetic sampling (CSS) augmentation that captures the geometric properties of crackles across different projected object spaces. We also outline a task-agnostic validation methodology that evaluates different augmentation techniques based on their goodness of fit relative to the space of original crackles. This evaluation considers both the separability of the manifold space generated by augmented data samples as well as a statistical distance space of the synthesized data relative to the original. Compared to a range of augmentation techniques, the proposed constrained-synthetic sampling of crackle sounds is shown to generate the most analogous samples relative to original crackle sounds, highlighting the importance of carefully considering the statistical constraints of the class under study.

Reliability and Validity of Computerized Adventitious Respiratory Sounds in People with Bronchiectasis

Background: Computerized adventitious respiratory sounds (ARS), such as crackles and wheezes, have been poorly explored in bronchiectasis, especially their measurement properties. This study aimed to test the reliability and validity of ARS in bronchiectasis. Methods: Respiratory sounds were recorded twice at 4 chest locations on 2 assessment sessions (7 days apart) in people with bronchiectasis and daily sputum expectoration. The total number of crackles, number of wheezes and wheeze occupation rate (%) were the parameters extracted. Results: 28 participants (9 men; 62 ± 12 y) were included. Total number of crackles and wheezes showed moderate within-day (ICC 0.87, 95% CI 0.74−0.94; ICC 0.86, 95% CI 0.71−0.93) and between-day reliability (ICC 0.70, 95% CI 0.43−0.86; ICC 0.78, 95% CI 0.56−0.90) considering all chest locations and both respiratory phases; wheeze occupation rate showed moderate within-day reliability (ICC 0.86, 95% CI 0.71−0.93), but poor between-day reliability (ICC 0.71, 95% CI 0.33−0.87). Bland−Altman plots revealed no systematic bias, but wide limits of agreement, particularly in the between-days analysis. All ARS parameters correlated moderately with the amount of daily sputum expectoration (r > 0.4; p < 0.05). No other significant correlations were observed. Conclusion: ARS presented moderate reliability and were correlated with the daily sputum expectoration in bronchiectasis. The use of sequential measurements may be an option to achieve greater accuracy when ARS are used to monitor or assess the effects of physiotherapy interventions in this population.