Systematic mixed-method review of barriers to end-of-life communication in the family context

Expectations in the Communication About Death and Dying: Development and Initial Validation of the End-of-Life Conversations - Expectations Scale

End-of-life (EOL) conversations with relatives or significant others are often avoided. One reason can be negative expectations regarding these conversations. The present study was conducted to develop and initially validate the End-of-Life Conversations - Expectations Scale (EOLC-E). An exploratory factor analysis (N = 307) resulted in a 20-item version with three distinct dimensions: expected own emotional burden (α = .92), expected other person's emotional burden (α = .94) and communication self-efficacy (α = .89). The EOLC-E total score correlated significantly with communication apprehension about death (r = .62), fear of death (r = .58), death avoidance (r = .52) as well as readiness for end-of-life conversations (r = -.38) and occurrence of previous conversations (r = -.29). Results suggest that the EOLC-E is a reliable and valid instrument to assess death and dying communication expectations. This measure has utility in communication research focusing on optimizing expectations and increasing EOL communication.

A Survey on End-of-Life Contemplation Among Patients on Dialysis

Introduction

Considering that mortality among patients on dialysis is high, it would be advisable for patients, relatives, and care givers to acknowledge that after dialysis initiation for many patients, the last phase in life has begun. We sought to investigate the frequency of precautionary planning directives, contemplation about the end-of-life (EOL) and embedding of patients' wishes in the interaction with relatives and the treating nephrologists.

Methods

In a questionnaire-based interview survey, we investigated the frequency of precautionary planning, EOL wishes, and frequency of relatives' or medical professionals' conversations with patients about those wishes as well as possibly associated demographic, socioeconomic and medical factors. The interviews were conducted by a single investigator in 7 dialysis centers in Germany.

Results

From 349 identified patients, 268 (77%) participated. The participants (36% female) had a median age of 70 (interquartile range [IQR]: 58-80) years and had spent a median of 3 (IQR: 1-7.5) years on dialysis. Overall, 46% of patients on dialysis contemplated their EOL wishes at least occasionally. Of those, 85% talked about EOL wishes with their relatives, whereas 19% discussed them with their nephrologists, yet another 28% would like to have such a discussion with their nephrologist.

Conclusion

Almost half of patients on dialysis contemplate their EOL and the vast majority engage in discussions about that with their relatives. Despite patients being interested, the frequency of consultation of nephrologists on EOL care is low. This study suggests that there is a substantial but unmet need for EOL care consultation for patients on dialysis.

Perspectives on Death and Dying by the Bereaved Designated Personal Representatives of Women Diagnosed With Metastatic Breast Cancer

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a complex disease with variability in disease subtype, length of survival, treatment selection, symptom burden, and, ultimately, end-of-life (EOL) care. Influencing factors that contribute to the complexity of this disease are socioeconomic factors, provider differences, and patient and family preferences. Because of this variability, it is challenging for health care providers to know when treatments are no longer helpful but contribute to a poor quality of end-of-life care and a poor death experience for both patients and their families. Determining the unique point, based on their own values and goals, at which patients and their family members feel that MBC treatment becomes unhelpful and unwanted, is difficult to ascertain. Of the 25 individuals who participated in the Quality of Death and Dying survey, 16 individuals participated in an interview to provide a reflection of the patient's EOL experience and its congruence with their wishes. Four major categories emerged as primary priorities essential to high quality end-of-life care, that is, resilience, communication, support, and knowledge. Without tailored and precise care, patients with MBC will continue to receive prolonged, inappropriate, and costly treatment, resulting in a potentially unacceptable poor-quality EOL and death experience.

"Why wouldn't we want to do this?" The challenge for oncology hospital nurses to engage in serious illness conversation and advance care planning

BACKGROUND

The viability of advance care planning (ACP) in cultures where discussing future desires is taboo is unclear, it is essential to examine the challenges faced by Chinese nurses lacking legal protection for ACP.

AIMS

To comprehend Chinese oncology nurses' perceptions of serious illness conversation and ACP, and identify barriers to engagement.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive exploratory study involving semi-structured interviews with 13 experienced oncology nurses, analyzed using thematic analysis and critical incident technique, following the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines.

FINDINGS

Four themes emerged: Inadequate Competence Causes Patient Harm, Cultural Influences to Patient Autonomy, Psychological Tolerance Neglects Best Interests, and Systemic and Legal Uncertainties Impact Patient Rights.

CONCLUSION

Policy changes supporting nurses in ACP implementation, a 'whole-system strategic approach' involving legislative changes, organizational support, and public awareness are crucial for optimizing ACP and meeting diverse patient needs.

Dyadic advance care planning: systematic review of patient-caregiver interventions and effects

INTRODUCTION

Family caregiver's involvement in advance care planning (ACP) is essential to provide high-quality end-of-life (EOL) care and to ease the surrogate decision-making burden. However, no systematic review has focused on existing ACP interventions involving patients and their families.

AIM

To systematically summarise current ACP interventions involving patients and their families.

METHODS

Five English and two Chinese databases were searched from inception to September 2022. The eligible studies were experimental studies describing original data. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools assessed the methodological quality. Narrative synthesis was conducted for data analysis.

RESULTS

In total, twenty-eight articles were included. Fifteen studies were randomised controlled trials, and the rest 13 studies were quasi-experimental studies. The data synthesis identified: (1) Key intervention components: strategies to promote ACP, ACP discussion and follow-up, as well as the role of family caregivers; (2) Effects on intended outcomes: interventions have shown benefit on completion of ACP actions, while inconsistent findings were found on the process outcomes and quality of EOL care. In addition, a logic model for patient-caregiver dyadic ACP was created, and the underlying mechanisms of action included well-preparation, open discussion and adequate support for plan/action.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides comprehensive evidence about patient-caregiver dyadic ACP, a promising intervention to better prepare for EOL communication and decision-making. A logic model has been mapped to give a preliminary indication for future implementation. More empirical studies are needed to improve this model and culturally adapt it in a real-world setting.

Palliativversorgung in der Dermatoonkologie – Aktuelle Praxis in deutschen zertifizierten Hautkrebszentren und dermatoonkologischen Schwerpunktpraxen

Hintergründe

Dermatoonkologische Patienten werden häufig in zertifizierten Hautkrebszentren oder dermatoonkologischen Schwerpunktpraxen betreut. Insbesondere in höheren Tumorstadien entwickeln Patienten krankheitsbedingt oder als Nebenwirkung der Therapien Symptome, die behandlungsbedürftig sind. Bei fortschreitender Erkrankung bedarf es trotz deutlich verbesserter Prognose seit Einführung der zielgerichteten und Immuntherapien einer vorausschauenden Vorsorgeplanung. Unklar ist, wie die Palliativversorgung von Hautkrebspatienten in der Dermatoonkologie aktuell organisiert wird.

Patienten und Methodik

In einer deutschlandweiten Befragung wurden alle zertifizierten Hautkrebszentren und dermatoonkologischen Schwerpunktpraxen angeschrieben und um Teilnahme an der anonymisierten Befragung gebeten.

Ergebnisse

Insgesamt gingen 45 Antworten (42%) ein. Der Großteil (98%) der Befragten screent Patienten regelhaft auf belastende Symptome und alle Zentren haben auch eine Anbindung an eine palliativmedizinische Versorgungsstruktur. Es wurde angegeben, dass lediglich 5% der ärztlichen Mitarbeiter die Zusatzqualifikation „Palliativmedizin“ führen. Bei 68% der teilnehmenden Institutionen wird den Patienten die Möglichkeit einer Vorsorgeplanung angeboten. Für 89% ist Palliativmedizin relevant für die tägliche Arbeit, und 82% wünschen sich hierzu mehr Fortbildungsmöglichkeiten.

Schlussfolgerungen

Mit der Erhebung kann dargestellt werden, dass die palliativmedizinische Versorgung einen wichtigen Stellenwert in der dermatoonkologischen Arbeit hat. Da jedoch nur ein geringer Anteil der Mitarbeitenden eine Weiterbildung in Palliativmedizin besitzt, wäre es für die umfassende Versorgung wünschenswert, wenn dieser Anteil größer würde.

Palliative care in dermatooncology - Current practice in German dermatooncological centers and specialist offices

BACKGROUND

Dermato-oncology patients are often treated in certified skin cancer centers or dermato-oncological specialist offices. Especially in higher tumor stages, patients develop symptoms, either disease-related or due to therapy-related side effects, requiring treatment. Despite a markedly improved prognosis since the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapies, advance care planning is required in progressive disease. It is unclear how palliative care of skin cancer patients is currently organized in dermato-oncology.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a nationwide survey, all certified skin cancer centers and dermato-oncological specialist offices in Germany were contacted and asked to participate in this anonymized survey.

RESULTS

Overall, 45 responses (42%) were received. The majority (98%) of the respondents screen the patients on a regular basis for distressing symptoms, and all centers are connected to palliative medical care providers. Only 5% of the medical staff members have the additional qualification "palliative medicine". In 68% of the participating institutions, the opportunity for care planning is offered to patients. For 89%, palliative care is relevant for everyday work, and 82% desire more research opportunities on this topic.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey has shown that palliative care plays a major role in dermato-oncological work. Given that only a small proportion of the staff have received specialized training in palliative care, however, an increase of this proportion would be desirable for comprehensive care.

Collaborative advance care planning in palliative care: a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

An effective tool for establishing concordant end-of-life (EOL) care in patients with cancer is advance care planning (ACP). However, various barriers, including psychological obstacles, hamper the access to ACP. Therefore, a new conceptual model combining a psycho-oncological approach with structured ACP was developed. The effectiveness and efficiency of this new concept of collaborative ACP (col-ACP) is evaluated in the present randomised controlled trial in patients with palliative cancer.

METHODS

277 patients with palliative cancer and their relatives were randomised into three groups (1) collaborative ACP (col-ACP) consisting of a psycho-oncological approach addressing barriers to EOL conversations followed by a standardised ACP procedure, (2) supportive intervention (active control) and (3) standard medical care.

RESULTS

Patients in the col-ACP group completed advance directives (p<0.01) and healthcare proxies (p<0.01) significantly more often. Additionally, they felt better planned ahead for their future treatment (p<0.01) and were significantly more confident that their relatives were aware of their treatment wishes (p=0.03). In fact, their goals of care were known and highly fulfilled. However, patients' and caregivers' quality of life, patients' stress, depression and peace did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The new, well-received, concept of col-ACP improves readiness and access to ACP and results in more consistent EOL care. Further, even if no direct influence on quality of life could be proven, it supports patients in planning their treatment, making autonomous decisions and regaining self-efficacy in the face of life-limiting cancer. Therefore, a closer interlocking and information exchange between psycho-oncological and ACP services seems to be reasonable.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03387436.

Difficulties of Cancer Patients' Relatives in End-of-Life Discussions: Validation of a Questionnaire

CONTEXT

Despite the potential benefits and the desire for end-of-life communication, it rarely occurs in the familial context. Relatives play a significant role in the communication process; thus, it is crucial to understand the difficulties that they face.

OBJECTIVES

To develop and evaluate the relatives' version of the Difficulties in End-of-Life Discussions - Family Inventory (DEOLD-FI-r) regarding its factor structure, reliability and validity.

METHODS

Relatives of patients with advanced cancer were recruited in a German hospital. The factor structure of the questionnaire was explored. Construct validity was examined through correlations between the DEOLD-FI-r and measures of avoidance of cancer communication, quality of life, distress, and experienced difficulty during end-of-life discussions. Additionally, we examined the group difference between those who had and had not engaged in the conversation.

RESULTS

About 111 relatives completed the survey (mean age 55.5 years, 52% female). The final version of the DEOLD-FI-r contained 23 items (α = .92). The exploratory factor analysis resulted in three factors explaining 74% of the variance. Each factor described another dimension of potential communication barriers in end-of-life discussions: 1) Own emotional burden, 2) Relational and patient-related difficulties, 3) Negative attitudes. Construct validity was supported by correlations consistent with our hypotheses and less reported communication difficulty by those who had already talked about the end-of-life with their relative (t(106) = 5.38, P < .001, d = 0.8).

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that the DEOLD-FI-r is a valid and reliable instrument for the systematic assessment of difficulties in family end-of-life communication. By focusing on relatives, it complements the already validated patient-version.

Questionnaires About the End of Life for Cancer Patients - Is the Response Burden Acceptable?

CONTEXT

Research about the end of life with the help of patient-reported outcomes in vulnerable populations such as cancer patients is needed but is potentially burdensome and can therefore raise concerns.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the response burden due to questionnaires about the end of life in cancer patients and to explore associations with individual variables.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional design response burden was assessed using a six-item instrument after completion of a survey that concerned the end of life. Associations with age, gender, type of care (curative/palliative), years since diagnosis, distress, depression, anxiety, death anxiety, readiness for end-of-life conversations, and readiness for advance care planning were explored via correlational analyses and multiple regressions. Burden due to the topic of end-of-life and completing questionnaires in general was compared.

RESULTS

A total of 269 cancer patients (mean age 61.4 (SD =12.3); 59.5% male; 58.4% in palliative care) completed the survey in a German hospital. The majority did not report response burden; 29.7% reported at least some burden due to study participation. The multiple regression (F [10,26] = 9.97, p < 0.001) indicated that stable predictors of response burden were higher death anxiety (ß = 0.4), lower readiness to talk about one's end of life (ß = -0.34) and higher age (ß = 0.23). No additional subjective burden due to the topic of end-of-life was reported.

CONCLUSION

The reported response burden seems acceptable since it was generally low. However, a subgroup did report some burden. Minimising burden and enhancing participants' benefits without compromising the research quality should further influence study designs in this field.

Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine and Indian Association of Palliative Care Expert Consensus and Position Statements for End-of-life and Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit

End-of-life care (EOLC) exemplifies the joint mission of intensive and palliative care (PC) in their human-centeredness. The explosion of technological advances in medicine must be balanced with the culture of holistic care. Inevitably, it brings together the science and the art of medicine in their full expression. High-quality EOLC in the ICU is grounded in evidence, ethical principles, and professionalism within the framework of the Law. Expert professional statements over the last two decades in India were developed while the law was evolving. Recent landmark Supreme Court judgments have necessitated a review of the clinical pathway for EOLC outlined in the previous statements. Much empirical and interventional evidence has accumulated since the position statement in 2014. This iteration of the joint Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine-Indian Association of Palliative Care (ISCCM-IAPC) Position Statement for EOLC combines contemporary evidence, ethics, and law for decision support by the bedside in Indian ICUs.

How to cite this article

Mani RK, Bhatnagar S, Butola S, Gursahani R, Mehta D, Simha S, et al. Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine and Indian Association of Palliative Care Expert Consensus and Position Statements for End-of-life and Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(3):200-250.

Life beyond Loss: A Retrospective Analysis of the Impact of Meaning of Life Therapy on the Grieving Process of Cancer Patients' Family Caregivers

Oncological disease in the palliative stage is a huge challenge for patients and their family caregivers (FCs) due to the fact that it confronts them with death, as well as physical, psychological, and existential suffering. Meaning of Life Therapy (MLT) is a brief structured psycho-existential intervention aiming to help patients in a meaning-making life review process, promoting end-of-life adaptation. The Life Letter (LL) resulting from MLT is an element that facilitates communication between the patient and their caregivers. The goal of this study was to understand the impact of MLT on the grieving processes of eight FCs and to study their perceptions of the role of the LL on grief through semi-structured interviews. The results of our qualitative analysis indicate that MLT was perceived by the FCs as a positive experience despite the conspiracy of silence being identified as a drawback. The LL was interpreted as a communicational element, promoting emotional closeness with the cancer patients and serving as a valuable tool in the FCs' adaptation to loss. Our research findings show that the needs of FCs, especially after experiencing the loss of their relative, are dynamic and specific. This is why it is urgent to develop interventions that consider the idiosyncrasies of end-of-life cancer patients and their FCs in order to avoid frustrated farewells, lonely deaths, and maladaptive grieving processes. This is the direction in which MLT should evolve.

End-of-Life Care Preferences of Patients with Advanced Urological Malignancies: An Explorative Survey Study at a Tertiary Referral Center

Background: Many people want to die at home, but it is often not possible because they do not share their wishes with family members. This study was conducted to find out the extent to which patients with advanced urological malignancies had wishes regarding their final stage of life, made arrangements accordingly, and communicated their wishes to relatives and health care professionals. Methods: We conducted a survey among advanced urological tumor patients during their clinic visit at a German university hospital using a 31-item questionnaire. Inclusion criteria were metastatic or irresectable prostate cancer, urothelial carcinoma, or renal cell carcinoma. Results: In total, 88 patients (76 male, 12 female) completed the questionnaire, and 62 of those respondents (70%) had received their tumor diagnosis within the past 5 years. Symptoms were reported by 80%, and 18% described five or more symptoms. The majority (88%) stated that they had thought about their preferred place of death but 58% had not informed anyone about it. The preference for a hospice as the place of death correlated statistically significantly with the absence of a domestic partnership (p = 0.001) or marriage (p < 0.001) and with a high number of symptoms (≥5; p = 0.009). However, 73% had not talked with their urological oncologist about care options in case their health deteriorated though 36% of those were interested in having a conversation about it. Conclusions: Our results showed that 9 out of 10 patients reflected on their preferred place of death but only a few discussed it with anyone. Based on this finding, physicians and healthcare staff should initiate discussions about early care planning so that patients in incurable situations can express their wishes regarding their preferred place of death.

Hospital care for the dying patient with cancer: does an advance care planning invitation influence bereaved relatives' experiences? A two country survey

OBJECTIVES

Advance care planning (ACP) is not systematically performed in Argentina or Norway. We used the post-bereavement survey of the ERANet-LAC International Care Of the Dying Evaluation (CODE) project (2017-2020) to examine the proportion of relatives who were offered an ACP conversation, the proportion of those not offered it who would have wanted it and whether the outcomes differed between those offered a conversation and those not.

METHODS

Relatives after cancer deaths in hospitals answered the CODE questionnaire 6-8 weeks post bereavement, by post (Norway) or interview (Argentina). Two additional questions asked if the relative and patient had been invited to a conversation about wishes for the patient's remaining lifetime, and, if not invited, whether they would have wanted such a conversation. The data were analysed using mixed-effects ordinal regression models.

RESULTS

276 participants (Argentina 98 and Norway 178) responded (56% spouses, 31% children, 68% women, age 18-80+). Fifty-six per cent had been invited, and they had significantly more positive perceptions about care and support than those not invited. Sixty-eight per cent of the participants not invited would have wanted an invitation, and they had less favourable perceptions about the care, especially concerning emotional and spiritual support.

CONCLUSIONS

Relatives who had been invited to a conversation about wishes for the patient's remaining lifetime had more positive perceptions about patient care and support for the relatives in the patient's final days of life. A majority of the relatives who had not been invited to an ACP conversation would have wanted it.

Better than expected? Predictors of coping with expectation violations in the communication about death and dying

Background

End-of-life (EOL) communication is often avoided, especially among young adults. Negative expectations concerning EOL conversations with relatives or significant others are one major reason.

Objective

To investigate how best to violate negative expectations concerning EOL conversations by identifying predictors of coping with expectation violations in this context.

Methods

Vignettes describing expectation violations in the context of EOL communication were presented to a sample of 261 university students. In a first experiment, the credibility of the expectation-disconfirming information was manipulated. In a second experiment, the valence of the disconfirming evidence was manipulated. As outcome measures, the subjective likelihood of two different responses to the expectation violation was assessed: (1) ignoring the disconfirming evidence (immunization) and (2) changing expectations (accommodation).

Results

Overall, participants experiencing a worse-than-expected event showed more immunization [F(1, 257) = 12.15, p < 0.001, ηp = 0.05], while participants experiencing a better-than-expected event showed more accommodation [F(1, 257) = 30.98, p < 0.001, ηp = 0.11]. Participants with higher fear of death [F(1, 257) = 12.24, p < 0.001, ηp = 0.05] as well as higher death avoidance tendencies [F(1, 257) = 17.16, p < 0.001, ηp = 0.06] showed less accommodation in response to a better-than-expected event.

Conclusion

In general, young adults appear to update their expectations quickly in response to unexpectedly positive experiences in the context of EOL communication. However, individuals with higher fear of death and higher death avoidance tendencies appear to be at higher risk of maintaining negative expectations despite disconfirming evidence.

Family caregivers' experiences of discussing their needs with a nurse during specialised home care utilizing the carer support needs assessment tool intervention - A qualitative study

PURPOSE

The Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool Intervention (CSNAT-I) was designed to help family caregivers identify, reflect upon, and express their support needs in a conversation with a health care professional and gain tailored support. The CSNAT-I has shown positive effects for both nurses and family caregivers but for more comprehensive understanding this study aims to examine family caregivers' experiences of discussing their needs with a nurse during specialised home care, utilizing the CSNAT-I.

METHODS

The study used an inductive qualitative descriptive design based on framework analysis. Data was collected using individual semi-structured telephone interviews with 10 family caregivers, with a median age of 66, from four specialised home care services.

RESULTS

Family caregivers appreciated having scheduled meetings with nurses utilizing the CSNAT-I which gave them an opportunity to focus on what was important to them. Family caregivers experienced that the conversations were co-created with a flexible dialogue. The conversations provided new perspectives and insights which helped in finding possible solutions. Family caregivers felt empowered by the co-created conversation and took on a more active role in involving the rest of their family to find support to themselves and the patients.

CONCLUSION

The CSNAT-I can facilitate communication between family caregivers and nurses leading to adequate supportive inputs. The intervention gives family caregivers an increased opportunity to be involved in their own support, which may enhance their sense of security. According to family caregivers' experiences, CSNAT-I may be an adequate way to support family caregivers to reflect and discuss their needs.

End-of-life wishes and care planning for patients with advanced skin cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced or metastatic skin cancer have a limited life expectancy and the majority die as a result of the tumor despite modern treatment options. The preferences of these patients concerning care during their last phase of life are currently unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

150 patients with advanced skin cancer (AJCC/UICC stage III or IV) were interviewed using a structured questionnaire.

RESULTS

75% of the respondents wished to die in their domestic environment, although a more advanced tumor stage and increased reflection upon end-of-life care lead away from this wish. However, only 42% reported having communicated this wish to someone else. 55% of the respondents had completed advance directives, while younger patients did this significantly less often (95% CI: 0.11-0.56; p  =  0.001). The majority of patients (62%) would like to have discussions about possibilities for end-of-life care with the attending dermato-oncologist.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the moment of death is unpredictable, early initiation of end-of-life advance care planning appears prudent. The attending dermato-oncologists should take the initiative to raise the subject with their patients during routine control visits. In this context, it may be useful to present available care options to patients and relatives and to design strategies for the event of deteriorating health.

Wünsche und Vorsorgeplanung für das Lebensende von Patienten mit fortgeschrittenem Hautkrebs: End of life wishes and care planning for patients with advanced skin cancer

Hintergrund

Patienten mit fortgeschrittenem oder metastasiertem Hautkrebs haben eine eingeschränkte Lebenserwartung und versterben zum größten Teil, trotz moderner Behandlungsmöglichkeiten, an dem Tumorleiden. Bislang ist unbekannt, welche Präferenzen für die Versorgung in der letzten Lebensphase bei diesen Patienten bestehen.

Patienten und Methodik

150 Patienten mit fortgeschrittenem Hautkrebs (AJCC/UICC Stadium III oder IV) wurden mit Hilfe eines strukturierten Fragebogens interviewt.

Ergebnisse

75% der Befragten wünschen sich im häuslichen Umfeld zu versterben, wobei ein höheres Tumorstadium und ein vermehrtes Nachdenken über die Versorgung am Lebensende davon wegführen. Nur 42% haben diesen Wunsch jedoch jemandem mitgeteilt. Vorsorgedokumente haben 55% der Teilnehmer ausgefüllt, während jüngere Patienten dies signifikant seltener tun (95%‐KI: 0,11–0,56; p = 0,001). Die Mehrzahl der Patienten (62%) wünscht sich Gespräche mit dem behandelnden Dermatoonkologen über Versorgungsmöglichkeiten am Lebensende.

Schlussfolgerungen

Auch wenn der Zeitpunkt des Todes nicht absehbar ist, so erscheint eine frühzeitig in die Wege geleitete vorausschauende Versorgungsplanung für das Lebensende sinnvoll. Die behandelnden Dermatoonkologen sollten hierbei die Initiative ergreifen und Patienten bei routinemäßigen Kontrollen auf dieses Thema ansprechen. Hier könnte es von Nutzen sein, den Patienten und Angehörigen die Versorgungsmöglichkeiten vorzustellen und Strategien für den Fall einer gesundheitlichen Verschlechterung zu erstellen.

Characterizing end-of-life communication in families

Background

The chronic disease course can be uncertain, contributing to delayed end-of-life discussion within families resulting in missed opportunity to articulate wishes, increased decisional uncertainty, and delayed hospice care. Consistent with the Family Communication Patterns Theory (FCPT), family communication patterns may affect the quality and timing of end-of-life discussion, hospice utilization, and the experience of 'a good death.'

Objective

To assess how families' conversation and conformity orientation (spontaneity of conversation and hierarchical rigidity) form four family communication patterns (consensual, pluralistic, protective, and laissez-faire) and may be associated with the number and timing of end-of-life discussions.

Design

A cross-sectional study.

Methods

Family members of loved ones who died from chronic illnesses while in hospice (n = 56) completed online surveys including a modified Revised Family Communication Pattern instrument (RFCP) and the Chronic Illness Rating Scale (CIRS). Additional survey questions assessed the number and timing of end-of-life discussions and timing of hospice enrollment. IBM SPSS version 26 was used for descriptive analysis.

Results

Most families (42.9%) were pluralistic, reporting communication styles with high conversation and low conformity orientation; (39.29%) were protective, reporting low conversation and high conformity orientation. Pluralistic families had more end-of-life conversations than did protective families.

Conclusion

Study findings suggest that there may be a relationship between family communication pattern type and inclination toward end-of-life discussion. This first step supports future research regarding whether the FCPT can be used to predict which families may be at increased risk for ineffective or delayed end-of-life discussion. Additional variables to consider include the timing of hospice enrollment and the quality of the dying experience. Clinicians may ultimately use findings to facilitate earlier identification of and intervention for families who are at risk for poor end-of-life communication and outcomes.

Experiences and support needs of informal long-distance caregivers at the end of life: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

There is a lack of research on the specific experiences and needs of geographically distant kin caregivers in end-of-life situations. Clinicians and researchers would benefit from a systematic overview. The scoping review aimed at examining the international literature on the experiences and needs of informal long-distance (LD) caregivers at the end of life, to address gaps in the evidence base, and to make recommendations for further research.

DESIGN

The scoping review was conducted according to the methodological framework of Arksey and O'Malley. Studies of various designs involving kin caregivers were analysed narratively.

DATA SOURCES

A highly sensitive strategy was used to search CINAHL, Google Scholar, PsycInfo, PubMed and Web of Science Core Collection, from inception to 8 November 2021, with searches rerun in CINAHL, PsycInfo and PubMed on 31 January 2023. An additional hand search of the reference lists of the identified articles was performed.

RESULTS

Two authors independently assessed the titles and abstracts of 3827 scientific papers. As a result, 89 full texts were reviewed and 20 articles plus one review were included in the review. Five major themes were identified: (1) LD as a barrier to caregiving, (2) communication difficulties and the role of video and telephone calls, (3) the burdens and benefits of LD caregiving, (4) interaction and conflict with local caregivers and (5) LD caregivers' wishes and needs for support.

CONCLUSIONS

Further quantitative and mixed-methods studies should be undertaken to improve our understanding of LD caregiving for relatives at the end of life. Studies to explore the feasibility and implementation of communication technologies in end-of-life LD caregiving are also needed.

Exploring Differences in Caregiver Communication in Serious Illness

Background: Demographic factors, such as disease context and family relationships, are communication mediators and moderators; however, little is known about how understanding these factors can improve caregiver communication with providers. Recognition of communication differences among caregivers may aid the development of approaches to improve serious illness communication. Objective: To explore whether caregiver communication differs by disease context (cancer vs. dementia) and caregiver communication type (Manager, Carrier, Partner, and Lone). Caregiver communication type is based on communication patterns between the care recipient and caregiver. Design and Measurements: Caregivers of persons with cancer and/or dementia were surveyed from a U.S. national research registry website. Measures of caregiver communication included information needs, communication confidence, perception of provider understanding of the caregiver, perceived frequency of caregiver assessment, and caregiver stress. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) determined significant differences between caregiver communication (p < 0.05) based on disease context and caregiver communication type. Results: Cancer caregivers reported higher unrecognized-demanded information states (i.e., not recognizing information was needed), more communication confidence, and more frequent caregiver assessment compared to dementia caregivers. Among caregiver communication types, Manager caregiver types were more confident communicating than other caregiver types and perceived greater understanding by providers than the Lone caregiver type. Manager caregivers reported significantly less stress than other caregiver communication types. Conclusions: Understanding disease context and caregiver communication type may help improve caregiver communication with health care providers.

Development and Formative Evaluation of the Family-Based Dignity Therapy Protocol for Palliative Cancer Patients and Their Families: A Mixed-Methods Study

BACKGROUND

Palliative cancer patients and family members in China may experience difficulties in expressing their feelings, concerns, and needs to each other because of the death-taboo culture and the strong desire to protect each other from being exposed to emotional distress.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to develop a nurse-led psychotherapeutic intervention aiming to facilitate meaningful conversations between palliative cancer patients and their family members, named family-based dignity therapy (FBDT), and preliminarily explore the anticipated benefits and challenges of the implementation of FBDT.

METHODS

A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was used. The FBDT was designed based on the dignity therapy protocol and additionally inspired by the Chinese tradition of "4 important things in life." Ten palliative cancer patients, 10 family members, and 13 oncology and hospice nurses were surveyed to evaluate the FBDT protocol both quantitatively and qualitatively.

RESULTS

The FBDT interview guide was endorsed by most palliative cancer patients and family members (>75.0%), as well as oncology and hospice nurses (>90.0%). Potential perceived benefits and challenges of FBDT were proposed by participants. The FBDT protocol was modified according to feedback from participants to make it more suitable to use in clinical practice in China.

CONCLUSION

The FBDT was perceived to be a potentially promising intervention to facilitate meaningful end-of-life conversations among palliative cancer patients and family members in China.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The FBDT might provide a means for nurses to promote potentially enhanced end-of-life communications for palliative cancer patients and their families. Further studies are needed to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of FBDT to confirm this in China.

Palliative Care Nursing in Australia and the Role of the Registered Nurse in Palliative Care

The registered nurse has crucial preventative, therapeutic, sociocultural, and advocacy roles in promoting quality holistic patient-centred palliative care. This paper examines, describes, and analyses this multifaceted role from an antipodean perspective. We conducted systematic searches using PubMed, Google Scholar, government guidelines, authoritative body regulations, quality control guidelines, and government portals pertaining to palliative care nursing in Australia. This paper relies upon the information garnered from publications, reports, and guidelines resulting from these searches and analyses. The fundamental principles and guiding values of palliative care (and nursing) and the raison d’etre for palliative care as a discipline are underscored and expanded on. Australian Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) pertaining to palliative end-of-life (EOL) nursing care and associated services are discussed. The relevant NMBA nursing standards that RNs need to have to administer opioids/narcotics in palliative care are summarised. The identification of patients who need EOL care, holistic person-centred care planning for them, and consultative multidisciplinary palliative clinical decision making are discussed in the palliative care context. Several components of advance care planning apropos health deterioration and conflicts are discussed. Several aspects of EOL care, especially palliative nursing care, are analysed using research evidence, established nursing and palliative care standards, and the Australian EOL CPGs.

Thinking globally to improve care locally: A Delphi study protocol to achieve international clinical consensus on best-practice end-of-life communication with adolescents and young adults with cancer

For the sizeable subset of adolescents and young adults whose cancer is incurable, developmentally appropriate end-of-life discussions are critical. Standards of care for adolescent and young adult end-of-life communication have been established, however, many health-professionals do not feel confident leading these conversations, leaving gaps in the implementation of best-practice end-of-life communication. We present a protocol for a Delphi study informing the development and implementation of clinician training to strengthen health-professionals' capacity in end-of-life conversations. Our approach will inform training to address barriers to end-of-life communication with adolescents and young adults across Westernized Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Global Accord countries. The Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Global Accord team involves 26 investigators from Australia, New Zealand, the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. Twenty-four consumers, including adolescents and young adults with cancer history and carers, informed study design. We describe methodology for a modified Delphi questionnaire. The questionnaire aims to determine optimal timing for end-of-life communication with adolescents and young adults, practice-related content needed in clinician training for end-of-life communication with adolescents and young adults, and desireability of evidence-based training models. Round 1 involves an expert panel of investigators identifying appropriate questionnaire items. Rounds 2 and 3 involve questionnaires of international multidisciplinary health-professionals, followed by further input by adolescents and young adults. A second stage of research will design health-professional training to support best-practice end-of-life communication. The outcomes of this iterative and participatory research will directly inform the implementation of best-practice end-of-life communication across Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Global Accord countries. Barriers and training preferences identified will directly contribute to developing clinician-training resources. Our results will provide a framework to support further investigating end-of-life communication with adolescents and young adults across diverse countries. Our experiences also highlight effective methodology in undertaking highly collaborative global research.

Assessing Family Caregiver Communication in Chronic Illness: Validation of the FCCT-CI

Background: Chronic illness care demands attention to the unique needs of family caregivers who support care at home, yet few tools exist for family caregiver assessment in the social domain of practice. Objectives: The Family Caregiver Communication Tool (FCCT) assesses caregiver communication as part of the family system and was originally developed for cancer caregivers. The aim of this study was to develop and psychometrically-validate a version of the FCCT for Chronic Illness (FCCT-CI). Methods: We revised the FCCT, including the generation of new items, and psychometrically tested it in 303 family caregivers recruited through Amazon Prime Panels. Item reduction through exploratory factor analysis was conducted, internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, and concurrent validity was conducted to demonstrate correlation of the new scale with previously validated instruments. Results: A principal axis analysis with promax rotation initially revealed a five-factor structure of the 27 items initially tested, but, after statistical and theoretical reduction and refinement, a 10 item FCCT-CI emerged. Cronbach's alpha ranged from .74 to .86 for the FCCT-CI instrument. Concurrent validity was supported by bivariate correlation tests. Conclusions: The FCCT-CI is the first psychometrically tested scale designed to assess caregiver communication with chronically ill patients, family members, and palliative care providers about caregiving. The FCCT-CI scale includes but is not limited to cancer caregiving and palliative care contexts and has good reliability and validity. Palliative care providers can use this tool to assess, design, and test interventions to support family caregivers.

Expectations, end-of-life fears and end-of-life communication among palliative patients with cancer and caregivers: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

During serious illness, open communication with caregivers can ensure high-quality care. Without end-of-life communication, caregivers may become surrogates and decision-makers without knowing the patient's preferences. However, expectations and fears may influence the initiation of communication. The present study investigates differences between palliative patients with cancer and caregivers regarding expectations of end-of-life communication, end-of-life fears and experiences with end-of-life communication.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study using a semi-structured interview and a paper-based questionnaire SETTING: University Hospital in Germany.

PARTICIPANTS

151 participants: 85 palliative cancer patients (mean age: 62.8 years, 65.9% male) and 66 caregivers (mean age: 56.3 years, 28.8% male).

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Expectations, end-of-life fears and experiences of end-of-life discussions.

RESULTS

Patients and caregivers wish for the patient to be self-determined. In general, participants reported more positive than negative expectations of end-of-life discussions. Importantly, concerns about emotionally burdening other person was rated much higher in an informal context than a professional context (F(1,149)=316 958, p<0.001, η_p²=0.680), even though the emotional relief was expected to be higher (F(1,149)=46.115, p<0.001, η_p²=0.236). Caregivers reported more fears about the last period of life and more fears about end-of-life discussions than palliative patients, whereas palliative patients tended to avoid the topics of death and dying to a greater extent.

CONCLUSIONS

There seems to exist a 'self-other' asymmetry: palliative patients and their caregivers expect substantial personal relief when openly talking about end-of-life issues, but also expect the other person to be burdened by such communication. Professionals repeatedly need to initiate end-of-life communication.

Advance care planning in primary care for cancer patients: Feasibility randomised trial

Background: Advance (anticipatory) care planning (ACP) requires discussions between patients and healthcare professionals about planning for future deterioration in health. ACP improves care coordination but uptake is limited and often deferred. Aim: We assessed the feasibility and acceptability to patients, carers and general practitioners (GPs) of a primary care ACP intervention for people with incurable oesophageal, gastric or pancreatic cancer. Design and Setting: 12-month feasibility randomised controlled trial in a Scottish Cancer Network. Method: Patients aged 18 or over starting palliative oncology treatment were randomised 1:1 to an ACP intervention or standard care. Intervention patients received an oncologist letter supporting them to request a GP review and ACP public information. Pre-specified analyses included trial recruitment and retention, ACP completion, and quality of life questionnaires (EQ-5D-5L, ICECAP-SCM) at baseline, 6, 12, 24 and 48 weeks. Qualitative interviews with purposive sampling explored patient, carer and GP experiences. Results: Of 99 eligible participants (269 screened), 46% were recruited (n=46) and randomised; 25 to intervention and 21 to control. By 12 weeks, 45% (9/20) intervention patients and 59% (10/17) controls had a documented ACP. Quality of life was maintained at 24 weeks except for physical symptoms but 30% had died. Social norms associating ACP with dying were prevalent among 23 participants interviewed. No psychological or clinical harms were identified. Conclusion: An RCT of ACP for people with incurable cancer in primary care is feasible. Acceptability and timing of care planning depended on patient, carer and GPs attitudes and behaviours. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03719716. Funder: Macmillan

'It was like taking an inner bath': A qualitative evaluation of a collaborative advance care planning-approach

BACKGROUND

Impaired readiness may hinder purposeful advance care planning in cancer patients. To reduce barriers to participation in end-of-life decision-making, a collaborative intervention was developed combining a psycho-oncological approach of dignity-based and cognitive-behavioural interventions, followed by a standardised advance care planning-process.

AIM

To evaluate the novel collaborative advance care planning-approach by synthetising cancer patient and carer perspectives on communicational and relational effects.

DESIGN

As a sub-project of a mixed-methods evaluation study, we conducted an inductive content analysis of qualitative interviews with advanced cancer patients and caregivers to deeply explore the focused impact of a collaborative advance care planning-approach on communication and relationship dynamics.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

Twelve patients with advanced cancer and 13 carers who participated in a collaborative advance care planning-intervention.

RESULTS

The collaborative advance care planning-approach was consistently evaluated positively by participants. Transcriptions of the semi-structured interviews were coded, analysed and merged under three main themes concerning communicational and relationship dynamics: action readiness, content readiness and impact on future communication and relationship.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel intervention served to foster individual readiness - including action and content readiness - for advance care planning-discussions by addressing highly individualised barriers to participation, as well as specific end-of-life issues. In addition, societal readiness could be promoted. Although the brief psycho-oncological intervention could not fully meet the needs of all participants, it can be used to develop individual psychotherapeutic strategies to improve different facets of readiness. The collaborative advance care planning-approach might require more time and human resources, but could pioneer successful advance care planning.

Matters of Life and Death: An Experimental Study Investigating Psychological Interventions to Encourage the Readiness for End-of-Life Conversations

INTRODUCTION

Talking about death and dying is evoking discomfort in many persons, resulting in avoidance of this topic. However, end-of-life discussions can alleviate distress and uncertainties in both old and young adults, but only a minority uses this option in palliative care. Even in healthy populations, talking about death is often seen as alleviative and worthwhile, but rarely initiated.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate different psychological interventions (a) encouraging the readiness for end-of-life discussions and (b) changing death attitudes in healthy adults of different ages.

METHODS

168 participants were randomized to four different interventions (IG1: value-based intervention with end-of-life perspective, IG2: motivation-based intervention with end-of-life perspective, IG3: combination of IG1 and IG2, CG: control group). Primary outcome was the readiness to engage in end-of-life topics. Secondary outcomes were fear of death, fear of dying and death acceptance. Assessments took place before, directly after the intervention and at 2 weeks of follow up.

RESULTS

IG2 and IG3 reported significantly more changes in the readiness to engage in end-of-life discussions than the CG (F[5.61, 307] = 4.83, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.081) directly after the intervention. The effect of IG3 remained stable at the follow-up. There were no significant effects of the interventions on end-of-life fears or death acceptance. Acceptability of the interventions was very high.

CONCLUSIONS

Short interventions can be useful to encourage end-of-life discussions and could be integrated in health care programs. The efficacy and effectiveness of these short interventions in palliative patients are currently examined.

Knowledge of end-of-life wishes by physicians and family caregivers in cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

To describe communication regarding cancer patient's end-of-life (EoL) wishes by physicians and family caregivers.

METHODS

An online questionnaire and telephone-based surveys were performed with physicians and family caregivers respectively in three teaching hospitals in Colombia which had been involved in the EoL care of cancer patients.

RESULTS

For 138 deceased patients we obtained responses from physicians and family caregivers. In 32 % physicians reported they spoke to the caregiver and in 17 % with the patient regarding EoL decisions. In most cases lacking a conversation, physicians indicated the treatment option was "clearly the best for the patient" or that it was "not necessary to discuss treatment with the patient". Twenty-six percent of the caregivers indicated that someone from the medical team spoke with the patient about treatment, and in 67% who had a conversation, caregivers felt that the provided information was unclear or incomplete. Physicians and family caregivers were aware if the patient had any advance care directive in 6% and 26% of cases, respectively, with low absolute agreement (34%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of open conversation regarding EoL in patients with advanced cancer with their physicians and family caregivers in Colombia. Communication strategies are urgently needed.

Communication in dyads of adult children at the end of life with their parents and parents at the end of life with their adult children: Findings from a mixed-methods study

OBJECTIVE

Patient-family member communication plays a decisive role in coping with an end-of-life situation and is strongly influenced by the dyadic relationship. There is a lack of research exploring and comparing the specifics of communication between (1) terminally ill adult children and their parents and (2) terminally ill parents and their adult children. The present study aimed at describing and comparing communication specifics within these two dyads.

METHODS

As part of the research project Dy@EoL on parent-adult child interactions, this mixed-methods study combined qualitative interviews and the Berlin Social Support Scales self-report questionnaire. Participants in both dyads were recruited via 12 inpatient and ambulatory palliative/hospice care providers between February 2018 and September 2019.

RESULTS

Participants included 65 patients (dyad 1: 19; dyad 2: 46) and 42 family members (dyad 1: 13; dyad 2: 29). Qualitative interviews revealed communication changes in the terminal illness situation and provided insight into each dyad partner's perception of openness and avoidance in the dyadic communication. The quantitative results showed that patients in both dyads provided significantly less informational support relative to family members. A strong similarity present in both dyads was the central motivation for limiting information sharing.

CONCLUSIONS

Individual preferences for information sharing suggest that the divergent needs of dyad partners must be carefully negotiated to ensure that patients are able to address important topics without putting too great an emotional burden on their family members. Tailored psychosocial support measures are needed to achieve this goal. The study was registered prospectively in the German Clinical Trials Register (registration N° DRKS00013206).