1
|
Watson J, Wilcockson J, Houston A, van Wyk A, Keyes S, Murphy D, Hare P, Wiersma E, Clarke C. 'I feel more part of the world': Participatory action research to develop post-diagnostic dementia support. DEMENTIA 2023; 22:1420-1439. [PMID: 37501339 PMCID: PMC10521152 DOI: 10.1177/14713012231190775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
Many people living with dementia are 'on the margins', not accessing services and support, despite policy and care advancements. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated this, with the closure of face-to-face support during lockdowns in the UK and globally. The aim of the 'Beyond the Margins' project was to develop, implement, and evaluate a face-face programme of support with, by and for people with direct experience of dementia who are on the margins of existing services and support. In March 2020 the project was interrupted by the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic and it changed to an online format. The three-phase participatory action research project included 40 people living with dementia, 26 care partners and 31 health and social care practitioners. A seven-week online personal development programme called Getting On with Life (GO) was developed, delivered, and evaluated. This paper focuses on the participatory approaches used to develop and implement the GO programme, and the resulting aspects of its approach to facilitation and content. Key features include the GO Programme's principles of providing a safe and a respectful space, and the programme's values of: Everyone who comes already knows things, can learn things and can teach things; Doing things 'with' each other, rather than 'for' or 'to' each other; Personalised goals-led by the needs of participants rather than an imposed agenda. A key finding was the importance of developing post-diagnostic programmes as a 'sandwich', providing a safe space for learning that is preceded by understanding pathways to access the programme and followed by explicit consideration of the next steps in increasing social engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Charlotte Clarke
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Durham University, Durham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mountain G, Wright J, Cooper CL, Lee E, Sprange K, Beresford-Dent J, Young T, Walters S, Berry K, Dening T, Loban A, Turton E, Thomas BD, Young EL, Thompson BJ, Crawford B, Craig C, Bowie P, Moniz-Cook E, Foster A. An intervention to promote self-management, independence and self-efficacy in people with early-stage dementia: the Journeying through Dementia RCT. Health Technol Assess 2022; 26:1-152. [PMID: 35536231 DOI: 10.3310/khha0861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are few effective interventions for dementia. AIM To determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an intervention to promote self-management, independence and self-efficacy in people with early-stage dementia. OBJECTIVES To undertake a randomised controlled trial of the Journeying through Dementia intervention compared with usual care, conduct an internal pilot testing feasibility, assess intervention delivery fidelity and undertake a qualitative exploration of participants' experiences. DESIGN A pragmatic two-arm individually randomised trial analysed by intention to treat. PARTICIPANTS A total of 480 people diagnosed with mild dementia, with capacity to make informed decisions, living in the community and not participating in other studies, and 350 supporters whom they identified, from 13 locations in England, took part. INTERVENTION Those randomised to the Journeying through Dementia intervention (n = 241) were invited to take part in 12 weekly facilitated groups and four one-to-one sessions delivered in the community by secondary care staff, in addition to their usual care. The control group (n = 239) received usual care. Usual care included drug treatment, needs assessment and referral to appropriate services. Usual care at each site was recorded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was Dementia-Related Quality of Life score at 8 months post randomisation, with higher scores representing higher quality of life. Secondary outcomes included resource use, psychological well-being, self-management, instrumental activities of daily living and health-related quality of life. RANDOMISATION AND BLINDING Participants were randomised in a 1 : 1 ratio. Staff conducting outcome assessments were blinded. DATA SOURCES Outcome measures were administered in participants' homes at baseline and at 8 and 12 months post randomisation. Interviews were conducted with participants, participating carers and interventionalists. RESULTS The mean Dementia-Related Quality of Life score at 8 months was 93.3 (standard deviation 13.0) in the intervention arm (n = 191) and 91.9 (standard deviation 14.6) in the control arm (n = 197), with a difference in means of 0.9 (95% confidence interval -1.2 to 3.0; p = 0.380) after adjustment for covariates. This effect size (0.9) was less than the 4 points defined as clinically meaningful. For other outcomes, a difference was found only for Diener's Flourishing Scale (adjusted mean difference 1.2, 95% confidence interval 0.1 to 2.3), in favour of the intervention (i.e. in a positive direction). The Journeying through Dementia intervention cost £608 more than usual care (95% confidence interval £105 to £1179) and had negligible difference in quality-adjusted life-years (-0.003, 95% confidence interval -0.044 to 0.038). Therefore, the Journeying through Dementia intervention had a mean incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year of -£202,857 (95% confidence interval -£534,733 to £483,739); however, there is considerable uncertainty around this. Assessed fidelity was good. Interviewed participants described receiving some benefit and a minority benefited greatly. However, negative aspects were also raised by a minority. Seventeen per cent of participants in the intervention arm and 15% of participants in the control arm experienced at least one serious adverse event. None of the serious adverse events were classified as related to the intervention. LIMITATIONS Study limitations include recruitment of an active population, delivery challenges and limitations of existing outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS The Journeying through Dementia programme is not clinically effective, is unlikely to be cost-effective and cannot be recommended in its existing format. FUTURE WORK Research should focus on the creation of new outcome measures to assess well-being in dementia and on using elements of the intervention, such as enabling enactment in the community. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered as ISRCTN17993825. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 24. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gail Mountain
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Jessica Wright
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Cindy L Cooper
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ellen Lee
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Kirsty Sprange
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Tracey Young
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Stephen Walters
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Katherine Berry
- Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Tom Dening
- Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Amanda Loban
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Emily Turton
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Benjamin D Thomas
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Emma L Young
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Benjamin J Thompson
- Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Bethany Crawford
- Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Claire Craig
- Art and Design Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - Peter Bowie
- Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Alexis Foster
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Powell C, Tomlinson J, Quinn C, Fylan B. Interventions for self-management of medicines for community-dwelling people with dementia and mild cognitive impairment and their family carers: a systematic review. Age Ageing 2022; 51:6593707. [PMID: 35639800 PMCID: PMC9154223 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and their family carers face challenges in managing medicines. How medicine self-management could be supported for this population is unclear. This review identifies interventions to improve medicine self-management for people with dementia and MCI and their family carers, and the core components of medicine self-management that they address. Methods a database search was conducted for studies with all research designs and ongoing citation search from inception to December 2021. The selection criteria included community-dwelling people with dementia and MCI and their family carers, and interventions with a minimum of one medicine self-management component. The exclusion criteria were wrong population, not focusing on medicine management, incorrect medicine self-management components, not in English and wrong study design. The results are presented and analysed through narrative synthesis. The review is registered [PROSPERO (CRD42020213302)]. Quality assessment was carried out independently applying the QATSDD quality assessment tool. Results 13 interventions were identified. Interventions primarily addressed adherence. A limited number focused on a wider range of medicine self-management components. Complex psychosocial interventions with frequent visits considered the person’s knowledge and understanding, supply management, monitoring effects and side effects and communicating with healthcare professionals, and addressed more resilience capabilities. However, these interventions were delivered to family carers alone. None of the interventions described patient and public involvement. Conclusion interventions, and measures to assess self-management, need to be developed which can address all components of medicine self-management to better meet the needs of people with dementia and MCI and their family carers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Powell
- School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences , University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
- Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research , Bradford, UK
| | - Justine Tomlinson
- School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences , University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
- Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research , Bradford, UK
- Medicines Management & Pharmacy Services , Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Catherine Quinn
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies , University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
- Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research , Bradford, UK
| | - Beth Fylan
- School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences , University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
- NIHR Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre , Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
- Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research , Bradford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rapaport P, Burton A, Palomo M, Griffiths J, Kelleher D, Leverton M, Vickerstaff V, Barber J, Bird M, Budgett J, Birch J, Rockwood K, Downs M, Lord K, Kales HC, Livingston G, Riley P, Cooper C. A mixed-methods feasibility study of a goal-focused manualised intervention to support people with dementia to stay living independently at home with support from family carers: NIDUS (New Interventions for Independence in Dementia Study) Family. Aging Ment Health 2021; 25:1463-1474. [PMID: 33222498 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1845299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the feasibility and acceptability of NIDUS-Family, a 6-8 session manualised, individually tailored, modular intervention supporting independence at home for people with dementia; and explore participants' and facilitators' experiences of the intervention. METHOD In this single group multi-site feasibility study, trained, supervised non-clinically qualified graduates (facilitators) delivered NIDUS-Family to family carer and people living with dementia dyads. We recruited participants from GP practices and memory services in London and Bradford. We completed quantitative outcomes pre- and post-intervention; and conducted qualitative interviews with participants and facilitators. Our pre-specified main outcomes were proportion of potential participants approached who agreed to participate, intervention adherence and acceptability to family carers, and facilitator fidelity to the manual. RESULTS We recruited 16 dyads (57% of those approached); 12 (75%) completed the intervention. Of 12 participants rating intervention acceptability, 9 (75%) agreed or strongly agreed that it had helped; 2 (18%) neither agreed nor disagreed and 1 (8%) disagreed. Mean facilitator fidelity was high (81.5%). Dyads set on average 3.9 goals; these most commonly related to getting out and about and increasing activity/hobby participation (n = 10); carer wellbeing (n = 6), managing physical complaints (n = 6); meal preparation/cooking (n = 5); and reducing irritability, frustration or aggression (n = 5). Almost all secondary outcomes changed in a direction indicating improvement. In our qualitative analysis we identified three overarching themes; relationships facilitate change, goal-focused versus manualised approach and balancing the needs of carers and people with dementia. CONCLUSION NIDUS-Family was feasible and acceptable to participants. Following refinements, testing in a pragmatic trial is underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penny Rapaport
- Division of Psychiatry, UCL , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Alexandra Burton
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Marina Palomo
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Jessica Griffiths
- Division of Psychiatry, UCL , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Daniel Kelleher
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford , Bradford , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Monica Leverton
- Division of Psychiatry, UCL , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Victoria Vickerstaff
- Division of Psychiatry, UCL Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Unit , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Julie Barber
- Statistical Sciences, UCL , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.,Priment Clinical Trials Unit, UCL , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Megan Bird
- Division of Psychiatry, UCL , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Jessica Budgett
- Division of Psychiatry, UCL , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Jodie Birch
- Division of Psychiatry, UCL , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Kenneth Rockwood
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Aging, UCL , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Murna Downs
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford , Bradford , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Kathryn Lord
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford , Bradford , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Helen C Kales
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, UC Davis , Davis , CA , USA
| | - Gill Livingston
- Division of Psychiatry, UCL , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.,Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Peter Riley
- Alzheimer's Society Research Network Volunteers , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Claudia Cooper
- Division of Psychiatry, UCL , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.,Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shehadeh A, Hunter S, Jeong S. Self-Management of Dementia by Family Carers: A Scoping Review. Gerontol Geriatr Med 2021; 7:23337214211016694. [PMID: 34095351 PMCID: PMC8142234 DOI: 10.1177/23337214211016694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Family carers increasingly take on the responsibility of self-management of
dementia as the condition progresses. However, research on this topic is scarce.
This scoping review aimed to identify the key characteristics related to
self-management of dementia by carers including its components,
theoretical/conceptual frameworks that underpinned these components and
measurements. A scoping review was conducted in 8 databases and 16 publications
met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-two components were identified and grouped
into two categories: activities and carer characteristics and skills. The
identified theoretical/conceptual frameworks were numerous and varied as were
the measures. There was a little consistency of the key characteristics of
self-management of dementia by carers. The findings assist carers and healthcare
providers to understand the components involved in self-managing dementia which
will guide the development and delivery of self-management support interventions
for carers. Further research is required to validate these findings and to
develop specialized conceptual frameworks and measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anas Shehadeh
- The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Sharyn Hunter
- The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Sarah Jeong
- The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chester H, Beresford R, Clarkson P, Entwistle C, Gillan V, Hughes J, Orrell M, Pitts R, Russell I, Symonds E, Challis D. The Dementia Early Stage Cognitive Aids New Trial (DESCANT) intervention: A goal attainment scaling approach to promote self-management. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2021; 36:784-793. [PMID: 33271639 DOI: 10.1002/gps.5479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study investigated goals identified by people with dementia and their carers to promote the self-management of symptoms and abilities; measured achievement using goal attainment scaling (GAS); and explored the reflections of Dementia Support Practitioners (DSPs) facilitating it. METHODS AND DESIGN Within this pragmatic randomised trial, DSPs gave memory aids, training and support to people with mild to moderate dementia and their carers at home. Data were collected across seven NHS Trusts in England and Wales (2016-2018) and abstracted from intervention records and semi-structured interviews with DSPs delivering the intervention, supplemented by a subset of the trial dataset. Measures were created to permit quantification and descriptive analysis and interview data thematically analysed. A GAS measure for this intervention in this client group was derived. RESULTS Engagement was high across the 117 participants and 293 goals were identified. These reflected individual circumstances and needs and enabled classification and assessment of their attainment. Seventeen goal types were identified across six domains: self-care, household tasks, daily occupation, orientation, communication, and well-being and safety. On average participants achieved nominally significant improvement regarding the specified goals of 1.4 with standard deviation of 0.6. Five interviews suggested that DSPs' experiences of goal setting were also positive. CONCLUSIONS GAS is useful for assessing psychosocial interventions for people with early-stage dementia. It has a utility in identifying goals, promoting self-management and providing a personalised outcome measure. There is a strong case for exploring whether these clear benefits translate to other interventions in other populations in other places.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Chester
- School of Medicine, Institute of Mental Health, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Rebecca Beresford
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Paul Clarkson
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Charlotte Entwistle
- Department of Psychology, Fylde College, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Vincent Gillan
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Formerly of School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jane Hughes
- School of Medicine, Institute of Mental Health, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Martin Orrell
- School of Medicine, Institute of Mental Health, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Rosa Pitts
- Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Ian Russell
- Swansea Trials Unit, Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK
| | - Eileen Symonds
- School of Medicine, Institute of Mental Health, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - David Challis
- School of Medicine, Institute of Mental Health, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dixon E, Piper AM, Lazar A. "Taking care of myself as long as I can": How People with Dementia Configure Self-Management Systems. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIGCHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS. CHI CONFERENCE 2021; 2021:656. [PMID: 34250524 PMCID: PMC8265518 DOI: 10.1145/3411764.3445225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Self-management research in HCI has addressed a variety of conditions. Yet, this literature has largely focused on neurotypical populations and chronic conditions that can be managed, leaving open questions of what self-management might look like for populations with progressive cognitive impairment. Grounded in interviews with seventeen technology savvy people with mild to moderate dementia, our analysis reveals their use of technological and social resources as part of the work of self-management. We detail how participants design self-management systems to enable desired futures, function well in their social world, and maintain control. Our discussion broadens the notion of self-management to include future-oriented, sociotechnical, self-determinate design. We advocate for expanding the way technologists, designers, and HCI scholars view people with mild to moderate dementia to recognize them as inventive creators and capable actors in self-management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Dixon
- University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Amanda Lazar
- University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Øksnebjerg L, Woods B, Vilsen CR, Ruth K, Gustafsson M, Ringkøbing SP, Waldemar G. Self-management and cognitive rehabilitation in early stage dementia - merging methods to promote coping and adoption of assistive technology. A pilot study. Aging Ment Health 2020; 24:1894-1903. [PMID: 31429315 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1625302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: It is essential to develop interventions that meet individual needs for coping and self-management of people with dementia. This study explored the feasibility and applicability of an intervention merging methods of cognitive rehabilitation and self-management groups for people with early stage dementia. The potential of this intervention to promote adoption of assistive technology was also explored.Method: People with early stage Alzheimer's disease (N = 19) participated in the programme comprising both individual and group sessions. Caregivers were involved in the individual session and a separate group meeting. The intervention both addressed individual goals and more general self-management approaches. In addition, both participants and caregivers were introduced to the ReACT app, a holistic solution tailormade to meet self-management needs of people with early stage dementia.Results: There was significant improvement in the participants' attainment of individual goals and satisfaction with goal attainment from pre- to post-intervention. Participants and caregivers generally reported a positive attitude towards the intervention, attendance rate was high, and all participants completed the intervention. Qualitative results also indicated that the intervention promoted awareness, acceptance and coping among participants. The specific benefits of using the ReACT app for self-management were also emphasised. Forty-two percent of the participants adopted the app and continued using it after completing the intervention.Conclusion: Results from this pilot study indicated that the intervention is both feasible and applicable and can be an effective method to promote coping and adoption of assistive technology among people with early stage dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laila Øksnebjerg
- Danish Dementia Reseach Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bob Woods
- Dementia Services Development Centre Wales, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom
| | | | - Kathrine Ruth
- Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Department of Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care, Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Moa Gustafsson
- Department of Neurology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Signe Pertou Ringkøbing
- Copenhagen Memory Clinic and Danish Dementia Research Centre, Section 6911, Department of Neurology, The Neuroscience Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gunhild Waldemar
- Danish Dementia Reseach Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Maki Y, Takao M, Hattori H, Suzuki T. Promoting dementia‐friendly communities to improve the well‐being of individuals with and without dementia. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2020; 20:511-519. [DOI: 10.1111/ggi.13896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2019] [Revised: 12/25/2019] [Accepted: 01/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yohko Maki
- National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology Aichi Japan
| | - Makiko Takao
- Hosei Graduate School of Regional Policy Design Tokyo Japan
| | | | - Takao Suzuki
- National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology Aichi Japan
- J. F. Oberlin University, Institute for Gerontology Tokyo Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
EBN Perspectives brings together key issues from the commentaries in one of our nursing topic themes
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Green
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK
| | - David Barrett
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bunn F, Goodman C, Jones PR, Russell B, Trivedi D, Sinclair A, Bayer A, Rait G, Rycroft-Malone J, Burton C. Managing diabetes in people with dementia: a realist review. Health Technol Assess 2018; 21:1-140. [PMID: 29235986 DOI: 10.3310/hta21750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dementia and diabetes mellitus are common long-term conditions that coexist in a large number of older people. People living with dementia and diabetes may be at increased risk of complications such as hypoglycaemic episodes because they are less able to manage their diabetes. OBJECTIVES To identify the key features or mechanisms of programmes that aim to improve the management of diabetes in people with dementia and to identify areas needing further research. DESIGN Realist review, using an iterative, stakeholder-driven, four-stage approach. This involved scoping the literature and conducting stakeholder interviews to develop initial programme theories, systematic searches of the evidence to test and develop the theories, and the validation of programme theories with a purposive sample of stakeholders. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-six stakeholders (user/patient representatives, dementia care providers, clinicians specialising in dementia or diabetes and researchers) took part in interviews and 24 participated in a consensus conference. DATA SOURCES The following databases were searched from 1990 to March 2016: MEDLINE (PubMed), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, The Cochrane Library (including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) database, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, AgeInfo (Centre for Policy on Ageing - UK), Social Care Online, the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) portfolio database, NHS Evidence, Google (Google Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA) and Google Scholar (Google Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA). RESULTS We included 89 papers. Ten papers focused directly on people living with dementia and diabetes, and the rest related to people with dementia or diabetes or other long-term conditions. We identified six context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) configurations that provide an explanatory account of how interventions might work to improve the management of diabetes in people living with dementia. This includes embedding positive attitudes towards people living with dementia, person-centred approaches to care planning, developing skills to provide tailored and flexible care, regular contact, family engagement and usability of assistive devices. A general metamechanism that emerges concerns the synergy between an intervention strategy, the dementia trajectory and social and environmental factors, especially family involvement. A flexible service model for people with dementia and diabetes would enable this synergy in a way that would lead to the improved management of diabetes in people living with dementia. LIMITATIONS There is little evidence relating to the management of diabetes in people living with dementia, although including a wider literature provided opportunities for transferable learning. The outcomes in our CMOs are largely experiential rather than clinical. This reflects the evidence available. Outcomes such as increased engagement in self-management are potential surrogates for better clinical management of diabetes, but this is not proven. CONCLUSIONS This review suggests that there is a need to prioritise quality of life, independence and patient and carer priorities over a more biomedical, target-driven approach. Much current research, particularly that specific to people living with dementia and diabetes, identifies deficiencies in, and problems with, current systems. Although we have highlighted the need for personalised care, continuity and family-centred approaches, there is much evidence to suggest that this is not currently happening. Future research on the management of diabetes in older people with complex health needs, including those with dementia, needs to look at how organisational structures and workforce development can be better aligned to the needs of people living with dementia and diabetes. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42015020625. FUNDING The NIHR HTA programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances Bunn
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | | | - Bridget Russell
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Daksha Trivedi
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Alan Sinclair
- Foundation for Diabetes Research in Older People, Diabetes Frail Ltd, Luton, UK
| | - Antony Bayer
- Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Greta Rait
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London Medical School, London, UK
| | | | - Chris Burton
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bunn F, Goodman C, Reece Jones P, Russell B, Trivedi D, Sinclair A, Bayer A, Rait G, Rycroft-Malone J, Burton C. What works for whom in the management of diabetes in people living with dementia: a realist review. BMC Med 2017; 15:141. [PMID: 28750628 PMCID: PMC5532771 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-017-0909-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2017] [Accepted: 07/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dementia and diabetes mellitus are common long-term conditions and co-exist in a large number of older people. People living with dementia (PLWD) may be less able to manage their diabetes, putting them at increased risk of complications such as hypoglycaemia. The aim of this review was to identify key mechanisms within different interventions that are likely to improve diabetes outcomes in PLWD. METHODS This is a realist review involving scoping of the literature and stakeholder interviews to develop theoretical explanations of how interventions might work, systematic searches of the evidence to test and develop the theories and their validation with a purposive sample of stakeholders. Twenty-six stakeholders - user/patient representatives, dementia care providers, clinicians specialising in diabetes or dementia and researchers - took part in interviews, and 24 participated in a consensus conference. RESULTS We included 89 papers. Ten focused on PLWD and diabetes, and the remainder related to people with either dementia, diabetes or other long-term conditions. We identified six context-mechanism-outcome configurations which provide an explanatory account of how interventions might work to improve the management of diabetes in PLWD. This includes embedding positive attitudes towards PLWD, person-centred approaches to care planning, developing skills to provide tailored and flexible care, regular contact, family engagement and usability of assistive devices. An overarching contingency emerged concerning the synergy between an intervention strategy, the dementia trajectory and social and environmental factors, especially family involvement. CONCLUSIONS Evidence highlighted the need for personalised care, continuity and family-centred approaches, although there was limited evidence that this happens routinely. This review suggests there is a need for a flexible service model that prioritises quality of life, independence and patient and carer priorities. Future research on the management of diabetes in older people with complex health needs, including those with dementia, needs to look at how organisational structures and workforce development can be better aligned to their needs. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO, CRD42015020625. Registered on 18 May 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances Bunn
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB, UK.
| | - Claire Goodman
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB, UK
| | | | - Bridget Russell
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB, UK
| | - Daksha Trivedi
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB, UK
| | - Alan Sinclair
- Foundation for Diabetes Research in Older People, Diabetes Frail Ltd, Luton, LU1 3UA, UK
| | - Antony Bayer
- Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, CF10 3AT, LL57 2EF, UK
| | - Greta Rait
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL Medical School (Royal Free Campus), Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| | | | - Christopher Burton
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB, UK
| |
Collapse
|