Perception and practices of public hospital pharmacists towards the antimicrobial stewardship programme in the State of Selangor, Malaysia

Exploring the discord between pharmacy education and practice in antimicrobial stewardship

Background

Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is a critical global intervention aimed at optimising antimicrobial use and decreasing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) with pharmacists playing a pivotal role within AMS teams. However, AMS is not comprehensively taught in pharmacy curricula and little is known about the relevance of pharmacists' training to meet AMS needs in South Africa.

Aim

This study aimed to explore the attitudes, knowledge and perceptions of clinical pharmacists towards AMS participation and training in South Africa.

Setting

This study was conducted among clinically practicing pharmacists in public and private healthcare sectors in South Africa.

Methods

A quantitative exploratory research design was selected for this study. The study was conducted using a self-administered structured survey. Categorical variables were analysed using simple descriptive statistics. Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were applied to determine differences between variables.

Results

Pharmacists demonstrated good attitudes knowledge and perceptions towards AMS (median 4.3). There was statistical significant differences in AMS participation between pharmacists of different years of experience (p = 0.005), sector of employment (p = 0.01), position of employment (p = 0.015) and presence of AMS programmes (p = 0.004). Pharmacists indicated that their Bachelor of Pharmacy undergraduate studies inadequately prepared them for their role in AMS (median 4.3).

Conclusion

Pharmacists show positive attitudes, knowledge and perceptions towards AMS. Education and training in AMS principles is obtained through master's programmes, short courses, Continued Professional Development (CPDs) and workshops and insufficiently incorporated in undergraduate programmes.

Contribution

This study confirms that undergraduate pharmacy programmes inadequately prepare pharmacists for their role in AMS.

Gaps in antimicrobial stewardship programmes in Asia: a survey of 10 countries

OBJECTIVES

To determine antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programme practices in Asian secondary- and tertiary-care hospitals.

METHODS

AMS programme team members within 349 hospitals from 10 countries (Cambodia, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippines, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam) completed a questionnaire via a web-based survey link. The survey contained questions as to whether 12 core components deemed essential for AMS programmes were implemented.

RESULTS

Overall, 47 (13.5%) hospitals fulfilled all core AMS programme components. There was a mean positive response rate (PRR) of 85.6% for the responding countries in relation to a formal hospital leadership statement of support for AMS activities, but this was not matched by budgeted financial support for AMS activities (mean PRR 57.1%). Mean PRRs were ≥80.0% for the core AMS team comprising a physician or other leader responsible for AMS activities, a pharmacist and infection control and microbiology personnel. Most hospitals had access to a timely and reliable microbiology service (mean PRR 90.4%). Facility-specific antibiotic treatment guidelines for common infections (mean PRR 78.7%) were in place more often than pre-authorization and/or prospective audit and feedback systems (mean PRR 66.5%). In terms of AMS monitoring and reporting, PRRs of monitoring specific antibiotic use, regularly publishing AMS outcome measures, and the existence of a hospital antibiogram were 75.1%, 64.4% and 77.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Most hospitals participating in this survey did not have AMS programmes fulfilling the requirements for gold standard AMS programmes in hospital settings. Urgent action is required to address AMS funding and resourcing deficits.

Preference and usage pattern of mobile medical apps for drug information purposes among hospital pharmacists in Sarawak, Malaysia

Introduction

Pharmacists are frequent users of mobile medical apps (MMA) for drug information (DI) and clinical decision-making purposes. However, the wide range of available MMA may be of variable credibility and results in heterogeneous recommendations. The need for subscription may also influence choice of apps.

Objective

The objective of this study was to determine the usage pattern of MMA among hospital pharmacists, including their perceptions and factors affecting their choice of apps.

Methods

This cross-sectional study required respondents to fill in an online questionnaire. The questionnaire included sections on respondents' demographic data, MMA usage pattern, perceived usefulness and opinion on subscription fees. Items were adapted from available literature and validated locally. It was made accessible for 6 weeks starting November 2019 for all pharmacists working in the 23 public hospitals in Sarawak to response (universal sampling). Collected data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics.

Results

A response rate of 37.2% was achieved (n = 162). Respondents were heavily reliant on MMA, with 78.4% accessing them multiple times daily. The majority also agreed that MMA contain correct and up-to-date information. A median of 5 apps were downloaded, suggesting an ultimate app catering for all DI needs was lacking. The Malaysian Drug Formulary was the most downloaded app (88.3%), whereas Lexicomp® was the most “well-rounded” in terms of functionality. Clinical pharmacists were significantly more likely to purchase MMA, in particular UpToDate® (p < 0.01) due to their need to access clinical updates. Respondents highly recommended institutional access for either UpToDate® or Lexicomp® be made available. Pre-registration pharmacists should be guided on judicious MMA usage, as they downloaded significantly more apps and were more likely to indicate not knowing which DI recommendation to follow (both p < 0.01).

Conclusion

MMA has become an indispensable tool for hospital pharmacists, however there was a tendency to download multiple apps for DI needs. Institutional access can be considered for credible apps identified to ensure accuracy and uniformity of DI recommendations, with purchase decision made after surveying the needs and preferences of end users.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-022-01949-9.

Antimicrobial stewardship programs: perceptions and practices among Jordanian healthcare practitioners

Objective

Antimicrobial stewardship programs are of paramount importance in containing antibiotic resistance and combat the acquisition of multi-drug resistance strains. Healthcare practitioners, specifically physicians and clinical pharmacists are the direct clinical antibiotic prescribing authorities. Therefore, this study aimed to assess Jordanian practitioners' perceptions and practices towards antimicrobial stewardship programs.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study, in which physicians and clinical pharmacists were approached to fill out a previously validated study instrument. A close-ended structured questionnaire comprising 34 questions covering aspects related to antimicrobial stewardship program perceptions, practices and participants' demographic data were used to collect pertinent information.

Key findings

A total of 286 participants were enrolled in the study. There was an overall positive perception towards antimicrobial stewardship programs, while practices related to this element was still suboptimal. Additional comparison of the overall perception scores among different demographic characteristics showed that long years of practice, postgraduate studies and practice in academic sectors yielded higher perception scores (P = 0.0335, 0.0328 and 0.0007, respectively).

Conclusion

There is an imminent need to enhance Jordanian practitioners' knowledge about antimicrobial stewardship programs. Clear recognition of integral antimicrobial stewardship programs' components must be coupled with highlight changes in current practices related to antimicrobials usage and prescription.