1
|
Parzonka K, Ndayishimiye C, Domagała A. Methods and Tools Used to Estimate the Shortages of Medical Staff in European Countries-Scoping Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:2945. [PMID: 36833641 PMCID: PMC9957245 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20042945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Healthcare workforce (HWF) shortages are the biggest challenges today in healthcare systems. Therefore, it is crucial to forecast the future needs of HWFs in order to plan accordingly. The purpose of this study was to identify, map, and synthesize the tools, methods, and procedures for measuring medical staff deficits in Europe. We used the Arksey and O'Malley scoping review methodology. Based on predefined criteria, 38 publications that were retrieved from multiple scientific databases, hand-searched on the internet, from relevant organizations, and scanned from references were considered. They were published between 2002 and 2022. There were 25 empirical studies, 6 theoretical papers, 5 reports, 1 literature review, and 1 guidebook. The majority estimated or measured shortages of physicians (14/38) and nurses (7/38) or looked at HWF generally (10/38). Various methods were used, including projections, estimations, predictions, simulation models, and surveys, which used tools such as special computer software or customized indicators, i.e., the Workload Indicators of Staffing Need method. Researchers estimated HWF shortages at both national and regional levels. Such projections and estimations were often based on demand, supply, and/or need. These methods and tools are not always suited to the needs of a country or medical facility, which is why they need to be further developed and tested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamila Parzonka
- Doctoral School of Medical and Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-008 Krakow, Poland
| | - Costase Ndayishimiye
- Health Economics and Social Security Department, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 8 Skawińska St., 31-066 Krakow, Poland
| | - Alicja Domagała
- Health Policy and Management Department, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 8 Skawińska St., 31-066 Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liver-Gut-Interaction: Role of Microbiome Transplantation in the Future Treatment of Metabolic Disease. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13020220. [PMID: 36836454 PMCID: PMC9958640 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13020220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The association between shifts in gut microbiome composition and metabolic disorders is a well-recognized phenomenon. Clinical studies and experimental data suggest a causal relationship, making the gut microbiome an attractive therapeutic goal. Fecal microbiome transplantation (FMT) is a method to alter a person's microbiome composition. Although this method allowed for the establishment of proof of concept for using microbiome modulation to treat metabolic disorders, the method is not yet ready for broad application. It is a resource-intensive method that also carries some procedural risks and whose effects are not always reproducible. This review summarizes the current knowledge on FMT to treat metabolic diseases and gives an outlook on open research questions. Further research is undoubtedly required to find applications that are less resource-intensive, such as oral encapsulated formulations, and have strong and predictable results. Furthermore, a clear commitment from all stakeholders is necessary to move forward in the direction of developing live microbial agents, next-generation probiotics, and targeted dietary interventions.
Collapse
|
3
|
Penman ID. National endoscopy services: reflections on the impact of COVID-19. Frontline Gastroenterol 2022; 13:461-462. [PMID: 36250167 PMCID: PMC9555138 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ian D Penman
- Centre for Liver & Digestive Disorders, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ravindran S, Thomas-Gibson S, Bano M, Robinson E, Jenkins A, Marshall S, Ashrafian H, Darzi A, Coleman M, Healey C. National census of UK endoscopy services 2021. Frontline Gastroenterol 2022; 13:463-470. [PMID: 36250173 PMCID: PMC9555135 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal (GI) Endoscopy (JAG) biennial census provides a unique view of UK endoscopy. The 2021 census was conducted to understand the impact of ongoing pressures, highlighted in the previous census, as well as COVID-19. METHODS The census was sent to all JAG-registered services in April 2021. Data were analysed across the domains of activity, waiting time targets, workforce, COVID-19, safety, GI bleeding, anaesthetic support, equipment and decontamination. Statistical methods were used to determine associations between domain-specific outcome variables and core demographic data. RESULTS 321 services completed the census (79.2% response rate). In the first 3 months of 2021, 57.9% of NHS services met urgent cancer waits, 17.9% met routine waits and 13.4% met surveillance waits. Workforce redeployment was the predominant reason cited for not meeting targets. There were significant regional differences in the proportion of patients waiting 6 or more weeks (p=0.001). During the pandemic, 64.8% of NHS services had staff redeployed and there was a mean sickness rate of 8.5%. Services were, on average, at 79.3% activity compared with 2 years ago. JAG-accredited services are more likely to meet urgent cancer waits, with a lower proportion of patient waiting 6 weeks or more (p=0.03). Over 10% of services stated that equipment shortage interfered with service delivery. CONCLUSIONS Services are adapting to continued pressure and there are signs of a focused response to demand at a time of ongoing uncertainty. This census' findings will inform ongoing guidance from JAG and relevant stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srivathsan Ravindran
- Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Siwan Thomas-Gibson
- Wolfson Endoscopy Unit, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, London, UK,Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Madeline Bano
- Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK
| | - Emma Robinson
- Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK
| | - Anna Jenkins
- Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK
| | - Sarah Marshall
- Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK,St. Mark’s Bowel Cancer Screening Centre, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, London, UK
| | - Hutan Ashrafian
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ara Darzi
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Mark Coleman
- Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK,Colorectal Surgery, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Chris Healey
- Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK,Department of Gastroenterology, Airedale General Hospital, Keighley, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Everett SM, Burr NE. Colonoscopy in the post-COVID-19 era. Frontline Gastroenterol 2021; 13:3-4. [PMID: 34966528 PMCID: PMC8666860 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2021-101817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Simon M Everett
- Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St James's University Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Nicholas Ewin Burr
- Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St James's University Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- Cancer Epidemilogy Group, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|