Improved characterisation of histologically proven liver tumours by contrast enhanced ultrasonography during the portal venous and specific late phase of SHU 508A

Incidental Findings in Pediatric Patients: How to Manage Liver Incidentaloma in Pediatric Patients

The World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) is addressing the issue of incidental findings (IFs) with a series of publications entitled "Incidental imaging findings-the role of ultrasound". IFs in the liver of newborns and children are rare and much less commonly encountered than in adults; as a result, they are relatively much more frequently malignant and life-threatening, even when they are of benign histology. Conventional B-mode ultrasound is the well-established first line imaging modality for the assessment of liver pathology in pediatric patients. US technological advances, resulting in image quality improvement, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), liver elastography and quantification tools for steatosis have expanded the use of ultrasound technology in daily practice. The following overview is intended to illustrate incidentally detected liver pathology covering all pediatric ages. It aims to aid the examiner in establishing the final diagnosis. Management of incidentally detected focal liver lesions (FLL) needs to take into account the diagnostic accuracy of each imaging modality, the patient's safety issues (including ionizing radiation and nephrotoxic contrast agents), the delay in diagnosis, the psychological burden on the patient and the cost for the healthcare system. Moreover, this paper should help the pediatric clinician and ultrasound practitioner to decide which pathologies need no further investigation, which ones require interval imaging and which cases require further and immediate diagnostic procedures.

Ultrasound Elastography for Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions

Focal liver lesions (FLL) are typically detected by conventional ultrasound or other imaging modalities. After the detection of FLL, further characterization is essential, and this can be done by contrast-enhanced imaging techniques, e.g., contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or by means of biopsy with histological evaluation. Elastographic techniques are nowadays integrated into high-end ultrasound systems and their value for the detection of severe liver fibrosis and cirrhosis has been shown in studies and meta-analyses. The use of an ultrasound elastographic technique for the differentiation of malignant and benign liver tumors is less well-established. This review summarizes the current data on utility and performance of ultrasound elastography for the characterization of FLL.

Prevalence of benign focal liver lesions and non-hepatocellular carcinoma malignant lesions in liver cirrhosis

Liver cirrhosis is associated with an increased risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, other benign and malignant liver lesions may co-exist or may be the only focal liver lesion (FLL) detected. Compared to HCC, comparatively little is known about the frequency and natural history of benign FLL in patients with established liver cirrhosis.

This review analyses the prevalence and frequency of benign and malignant FLL others than hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in liver cirrhosis including imaging and autopsy studies. Understanding these data should be helpful in avoiding misdiagnoses.

[Alternatives of histological material collection - When and how is histological confirmation by ultrasound (US), computer tomography (CT) or endosonography (EUS) useful?]

Histological classifications of tumorous lesions together with adequate staging are necessary for stage-appropriate and personalized therapies. The indications, technical possibilities, and limitations as well as potential complications of image-guided needle biopsy by ultrasound, computed tomography, and endosonography are described. Which procedure for which organ and which lesion?

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the evaluation of malignant focal liver lesions

In this review, the authors address the analysis of different types of malignant focal liver lesions (FLLs) using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS). The specific enhancing patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and metastases are discussed and exemplified with images. In addition, the use of CEUS in malignant portal vein thrombosis is discussed. The advantages and limitations of CEUS for the analysis of malignant FLLs are also discussed.

Imaging Features of Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

PURPOSE

 Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (f-HCC) is a rare primary liver tumor. Imaging plays an important role in diagnosis. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features of histologically proven f-HCC in comparison to benign focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH).

MATERIALS & METHODS

 16 patients with histologically proven f-HCC lesions and 30 patients with FNH lesions were retrospectively reviewed regarding CEUS features to determine the malignant or benign nature of the focal liver lesions (FLL). Five radiologists assessed the CEUS enhancement pattern and came to a consensus using the EFSUMB (European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology) guideline criteria.

RESULTS

 Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma manifested as a single and huge FLL. On CEUS, f-HCC showed heterogeneous hyperenhancement in the arterial phase and hypoenhancement (16/16, 100 %) in the portal venous and late phases (PVLP) as a sign of malignancy. In contrast to the hypoenhancement of f-HCC in the PVLP, all patients with FNH showed hyperenhancement as the most distinctive feature (P < 0.01). 8 f-HCC lesions showed a central scar as an unenhanced area (8/16, 50.0 %), which could also be detected in 53.3 % (16/30) of FNH lesions (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

 By analyzing the hypoenhancement in the PVLP, CEUS imaging reliably diagnosed f-HCC as a malignant FLL. CEUS also showed differentiation between f-HCC and FNH lesions, showing similar non-enhanced central scars, whereas f-HCC lesions showed peripheral hyperenhancement in the arterial phase and early washout in the PVLP.

Analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound features of hepatocellular adenoma according to different pathological molecular classifications

OBJECTIVE

To explore the specific contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features of hepatocellular adenomas (HCA) according to their pathological molecular classifications.

METHODS & MATERIALS

In this retrospective study, fifty-three histopathologically proved HCA lesions (mean size, 39.7±24.9 mm) were included. Final histopathological diagnosis of HCA lesions were identified by surgical resection (n = 51) or biopsy (n = 2) specimens. CEUS imaging features were compared among four subgroups according to World Health Organization (WHO) 2019 pathological molecular classifications standards. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for statistical analysis of continuous variables. Fisher's exact test were used for categorical variables. The sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and accuracy of CEUS feature in diagnosis of each HCA subtype were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

Final histopathological diagnosis included HNF-1α inactivated HCAs (H-HCA, n = 12), β-catenin activated HCAs (B-HCA, n = 8), inflammatory HCAs (I-HCA, n = 31), and unclassified HCAs (U-HCA, n = 2). During arterial phase of CEUS, all HCAs were hyper-enhanced, 66.6% (8/12) of H-HCAs and 50% (4/8) of B-HCAs displayed complete hyperenhancement, whereas 58.0% (18/31) of I-HCAs showed centripetal filling hyperenhancement pattern (P = 0.016). Hyper-enhanced subcapsular arteries could be detected in 64.5% (20/31) I-HCAs during early arterial phase. During portal venous and late phase, sustained hyper- or iso-enhancement were observed in 91.7% (11/12) of H-HCAs, while most of I-HCAs (61.3%, 19/31) and B-HCAs (7/8, 87.5%) were hypo-enhanced (P = 0.000). Central unenhanced areas were most commonly observed in I-HCAs (29.0%, 9/31) (P = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

Depending on its unique imaging features including enhancement filling pattern, hyper-enhanced subcapsular artery and presence of washout, CEUS might provide helpful diagnostic information for preoperative prediction of various HCA molecular subtypes.

Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver - Update 2020 - WFUMB in Cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS

The present, updated document describes the fourth iteration of recommendations for the hepatic use of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), first initiated in 2004 by the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB). The previous updated editions of the guidelines reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines not only for hepatic but also for non-hepatic applications.The 2012 guideline requires updating as previously the differences of the contrast agents were not precisely described and the differences in contrast phases as well as handling were not clearly indicated. In addition, more evidence has been published for all contrast agents. The update also reflects the most recent developments in contrast agents, including the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval as well as the extensive Asian experience, to produce a truly international perspective.These guidelines and recommendations provide general advice on the use of ultrasound contrast agents (UCA) and are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of UCA in liver applications on an international basis to improve the management of patients.

Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver-Update 2020 WFUMB in Cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS

The present, updated document describes the fourth iteration of recommendations for the hepatic use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, first initiated in 2004 by the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The previous updated editions of the guidelines reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines not only for hepatic but also for non-hepatic applications. The 2012 guideline requires updating as, previously, the differences in the contrast agents were not precisely described and the differences in contrast phases as well as handling were not clearly indicated. In addition, more evidence has been published for all contrast agents. The update also reflects the most recent developments in contrast agents, including U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval and the extensive Asian experience, to produce a truly international perspective. These guidelines and recommendations provide general advice on the use of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) and are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of UCAs in liver applications on an international basis to improve the management of patients.

Three cases of histologically proven hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma evaluated using a second-generation microbubble contrast medium in ultrasonography: case reports

Background

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEH) is rare; it is reported in < 1 person in 1,000,000 individuals. For accurate diagnosis, information regarding multiple graphic modalities in HEH is required. However, there is very little information concerning Sonazoid® contrast enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in HEH.

Case presentation

The present report describes the histologically proven three HEH cases evaluated using Sonazoid® CEUS. Case 1 was a 33-year-old female patient with no relevant past medical history, who experienced right upper quadrant pain. Conventional abdominal US revealed multiple low echoic liver nodules with vague borderlines. In CEUS, the vascularity of the nodules was similar to that seen in the neighboring normal liver. Later in the portal venous and late phases (PVLP) and post vascular phase, washout of Sonazoid® was detected in the nodules. Case 2 was a 93-year-old female patient with a previous medical history including operations for breast cancer and ovary cancer in her 50’s. Conventional abdominal US revealed multiple low echoic nodules, some of which contained cystic lesions. In the early vascular phase of CEUS, nodules excluding the central anechoic regions were enhanced from peripheral sites. Although the enhancement inside the nodules persisted in both the PVLP and post vascular phase, anechoic areas in the center of some nodules were not enhanced at all. Case 3 was a 39-year-old male patient presented with right upper-quadrant pain, without any relevant past medical history. Conventional abdominal US revealed multiple low echoic liver nodules. In the early vascular phase of CEUS, nodules were gradually enhanced from the peripheral sites as ringed enhancement. Sonazoid®was washed out from the nodules in the PVLP and post vascular phase.

Conclusions

The most important feature was peripheral enhancement in the early vascular phase. In case 2, the enhancement of the parenchyma of liver nodules persisted even in the PVLP; indicating the lower degree of malignant potential than others. Actually, the tumors did not extend without any treatment in case 2. Since case 2 is the first case report of HEH with cystic lesions, in patients with liver nodules including cystic lesions, HEH is a potential diagnosis.

Combination of CEUS and MRI for the diagnosis of periampullary space-occupying lesions: a retrospective analysis

Background

The value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and the combination of CEUS and MRI (CCWM) for the diagnosis of periampullary space-occupying lesions (PSOL) was investigated.

Methods

A total of 102 patients diagnosed with PSOLs by surgery or biopsy were recruited retrospectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of MRI, CEUS, and CCWM were analyzed.

Results

MRI, CEUS, and CCWM allowed for the accurate detection of 91.17, 92.15, and 99.01% of PSOLs, respectively. The specificity, PPV, and accuracy of CCWM were significantly different from MRI and CEUS (p < 0.05). However, there the sensitivity and NPV were not significantly different among the three diagnostic technologies. In addition, the specificity, PPV, and accuracy were not significantly different between MRI and CEUS (all p > 0.05).

Conclusions

CCWM is valuable for differentiating benign and malignant PSOL, which provides important guiding significances for the clinic.

Ultrasound Imaging of Hepatocellular Adenoma Using the New Histology Classification

Hepatocellular adenoma is a rare benign liver tumor. Predisposing factors include hepatic storage diseases and some genetic conditions. A new histology-based classification has been proposed but to date, the corresponding ultrasound imaging features have not been reported. Here we review the new classification scheme and discuss the corresponding features on contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.

Standardisierte Befundung und Dokumentation der Kontrastmittelsonografie der Leber (CEUS LI-RADS)

In der Abklärung von hepatozellulären Karzinomen (HCCs) bei Hochrisikopatienten wurde zur standardisierten Befundung und Dokumentation der Kontrastmittel-Computertomografie (CECT) und Kontrastmittel-Magnetresonanztomografie (CEMRT) vor wenigen Jahren das „Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System” (LI-RADS) durch das American College of Radiology (ACR) erstellt. Die LI-RADS-Kategorisierung wird zur Klassifikation von Leberläsionen in der Leberzirrhose als sicher benigne (LR-1), intermediär (LR2 – 4) bis zu „definitiv HCC“ (LR-5) beurteilt. Seit 2014 wurde die LI-RADS-Klassifikation durch eine Arbeitsgruppe von internationalen Radiologen und Hepatologen auf die Kontrastmittelsonografie erweitert. Zeitgleich mit der Zulassung des Kontrastmittels SonoVue™ (in den USA Lumason™) wurde die Klassifikation 2016 in die LI-RADS Kategorisierung integriert und wird in diesem Artikel erläutert (CEUS-LI-RADS).

Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging of solid benign focal liver lesions

Ultrasound is well accepted worldwide for imaging of the liver. Absences of radiation exposure, low cost and large diffusion are some of the advantages that make this technique the first to be used in the assessment of focal liver lesions (FLL). Areas covered: Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been introduced more than twenty years ago, and its detection rate is comparable to that of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) and contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT). In this narrative review, we discuss the main CEUS features of benign liver lesions and controversies in published results including the gold standard chosen and the quality and knowledge of the preferred techniques. Expert commentary: CEUS is safe and allows an immediate evaluation of the nature of FLL. CEUS permits differentiation between malignant and benign FLL in healthy liver parenchyma by analysing the arterial, portal venous and late phases. CEMRI and CECT are reliable to characterize FLL but higher costs, radiation exposure, nephrotoxicity (in particular for CECT) and absence of real time imaging limit the appropriate evaluation of FLL. Therefore CEUS can be preferred in most clinical situations, and when results are unclear or suggestive for malignant FLL, biopsy and histological examination can be directly initiated avoiding unnecessary additional imaging.

Novel ultrasound-based methods to assess liver disease: The game has just begun

In the last 10 years the availability of ultrasound elastography allowed to diagnose and stage liver fibrosis in a non-invasive way and changed the clinical practice of hepatology. Newer ultrasound-based techniques to evaluate properties of the liver tissue other than fibrosis are emerging and will lead to a more complete characterization of the full spectrum of diffuse and focal liver disease. Since these methods are currently undergoing validation and go beyond elastography for liver tissue evaluation, they were not included in the recent guidelines regarding elastography issued by the European Federation of Societies in Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. In this review paper, we outline the major advances in the field of ultrasound for liver applications, with special emphasis on techniques that could soon be part of the future armamentarium of ultrasound specialists devoted to the assessment of liver disease. Specifically, we discuss current and future ultrasound assessment of steatosis, spleen stiffness for portal hypertension, and elastography for the evaluation of focal liver lesions; we also provide a short glimpse into the next generation of ultrasound diagnostic methods.

Non-Invasive Diagnostic Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Hepatitis B Virus-Endemic Areas: Is Cirrhosis Indispensable?

AIM

To confirm whether cirrhosis is indispensable for the non-invasive diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-endemic areas.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and December 2014, a total of 409 patients with pathologically proven focal liver lesions who underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) were recruited from our institution. Clinical liver cirrhosis, HBV/HCV infection and HCC-typical vascular pattern of the targeted lesion on CEUS were evaluated. The following 3 criteria were applied to these patients to diagnose HCC: criterion 1, clinical liver cirrhosis and HCC-typical vascular pattern; criterion 2, HBV/HCV infection and HCC-typical vascular pattern; criterion 3, HBV/HCV infection or clinical liver cirrhosis and HCC-typical vascular pattern. Pathological reports were considered the gold standard.

RESULTS

A total of 311 patients had confirmed HCC by pathology. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and area under the ROC curve for criterion 1 were 29.6, 90.8, 44.3, 91.1, 28.9, and 0.60% respectively. For criterion 2, they were 83.3, 74.5, 81.2, 91.2, 58.4, and 0.79%, respectively, and for criterion 3, they were 86.2, 72.5, 82.9, 90.9, 62.3, and 0.79% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In HBV-endemic areas, when using the HBV/HCV infection instead of cirrhosis as the precondition of the non-invasive diagnostic criteria for HCC, we should be aware of the potential false positive. Cirrhosis still plays an important role in the non-invasive diagnostic criteria for HCC because of the high specificity.

How to perform Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS)

"How to perform contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)" provides general advice on the use of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) for clinical decision-making and reviews technical parameters for optimal CEUS performance. CEUS techniques vary between centers, therefore, experts from EFSUMB, WFUMB and from the CEUS LI-RADS working group created a discussion forum to standardize the CEUS examination technique according to published evidence and best personal experience. The goal is to standardise the use and administration of UCAs to facilitate correct diagnoses and ultimately to improve the management and outcomes of patients.

Contrast-enhanced US for characterization of focal liver lesions: a comprehensive meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in differentiating malignant from benign focal liver lesions (FLLs).

METHODS

Cochrane Library, PubMed and Web of Science databases were systematically searched and checked for studies using CEUS in characterization of FLLs. Data necessary to construct 2×2 contingency tables were extracted from included studies. The QUADAS tool was utilized to assess the methodologic quality of the studies. Meta-analysis included data pooling, subgroup analyses, meta-regression and investigation of publication bias was comprehensively performed.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven studies were included in this meta-analysis and the overall diagnostic accuracy in characterization of FLLs was as follows: pooled sensitivity, 0.92 (95%CI: 0.91-0.93); pooled specificity, 0.87 (95%CI: 0.86-0.88); diagnostic odds ratio, 104.20 (95%CI: 70.42-154.16). Subgroup analysis indicated higher diagnostic accuracy of the second-generation contrast agents (CAs) than the first-generation CA (Levovist; DOR: 118.27 vs. 62.78). Furthermore, Sonazoid demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy among three major CAs (SonoVue, Levovist and Sonazoid; DOR: 118.82 vs. 62.78 vs. 227.39). No potential publication bias was observed of the included studies.

CONCLUSION

CEUS is an accurate tool to stratify the risk of malignancy in FLLs. The second-generation CAs, especially Sonazoid may greatly improve diagnostic performance.

KEY POINTS

• CEUS shows excellent diagnostic accuracy in differentiating malignant from benign FLLs. • The second-generation CAs have higher diagnostic accuracy than first-generation CAs. • Sonazoid demonstrates the highest diagnostic accuracy among three major CAs.

Contrast enhanced ultrasound features of hepatic cystadenoma and hepatic cystadenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Hepatic (biliary) cystic tumor (HBCT) is a rare focal cystic liver lesion, which has been rarely described in the literature. In our current multicenter, retrospective study, we aimed to analyze contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features and its diagnostic performance in histologically proved HBCT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-three patients with single HBCT were retrospectively analyzed. Histologically, 17 (73.9%) were benign hepatic (biliary) cystadenoma (HBCA), 6 (26.1%) were hepatic (biliary) cystadenocarcinoma (HBCAC). All CEUS examinations were assessed by two independent radiologists in consensus. Criteria of CEUS imaging evaluation included the contrast enhancement pattern of lesion (hypoenhancing, hyperenhancing, isoenhancing in comparison to the surrounding liver parenchyma) during the arterial, portal venous and late phases.

RESULTS

After injection of ultrasound contrast agents, most of the HBCTs (78.3%, 18/23) had typical honeycomb enhancement pattern of the cystic wall, septa or mural nodules. Comparing between HBCA and HBCAC, hyperenhancement of the honeycomb septa during the arterial phase was more common in HBCA (p = .047). However, hypoenhancement during the portal venous and late phases was the characteristic of HBCAC (p = .041).

CONCLUSIONS

The EFSUMB algorithm for CEUS for characterization of solid focal liver lesions is also applicable to HBCT. CEUS evaluation can avoid further diagnostic investigations or invasive biopsy procedure.

Contrast-enhanced endobronchial ultrasound: Potential value of a new method

Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) has gained importance for mediastinal lymph node staging. Contrast-enhanced EBUS is so far not a discussed technique including contrast-enhanced high mechanical index (MI)-EBUS and potentially contrast-enhanced low MI-EBUS. Possible use could include characterization of mediastinal lymph nodes for better selection of biopsies, differential diagnosis of the primary tumor, and evaluation of thrombosis or tumor in vein infiltration.

Ultrasound contrast agents

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) plays an important role in imaging of the mediastinum and abdominal organs. Since the introduction of US contrast agents (UCA) for transabdominal US, attempts have been made to apply contrast-enhanced US techniques also to EUS. Since 2003, specific contrast-enhanced imaging was possible using EUS. Important studies have been published regarding contrast-enhanced EUS and the characterization of focal pancreatic lesions, lymph nodes, and subepithelial tumors. In this manuscript, we describe the relevant UCA, their application, and specific image acquisition as well as the principles of image tissue characterization using contrast-enhanced EUS. Safety issues, potential future developments, and EUS-specific issues are reviewed.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of histologically proven hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma

AIM: To analyze contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features of histologically proven hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) in comparison to other multilocular benign focal liver lesions (FLL).

METHODS: Twenty-five patients with histologically proven HEHE and 45 patients with histologically proven multilocular benign FLL were retrospectively reviewed. Four radiologists assessed the CEUS enhancement pattern in consensus.

RESULTS: HEHE manifested as a single (n = 3) or multinodular (n = 22) FLL. On CEUS, HEHE showed rim-like (18/25, 72%) or heterogeneous hyperenhancement (7/25, 28%) in the arterial phase and hypoenhancement (25/25, 100%) in the portal venous and late phases (PVLP), a sign of malignancy. Eighteen patients showed central unenhanced areas (18/25, 72%); in seven patients (7/25, 28%), more lesions were detected in the PVLP. In contrast, all patients with hemangioma and focal nodular hyperplasia showed hyperenhancement as the most distinctive feature (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION: CEUS allows for characterization of unequivocal FLL. By analyzing the hypoenhancement in the PVLP, CEUS can determine the malignant nature of HEHE.

Temporal regularization of ultrasound-based liver motion estimation for image-guided radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Ultrasound-based motion estimation is an expanding subfield of image-guided radiation therapy. Although ultrasound can detect tissue motion that is a fraction of a millimeter, its accuracy is variable. For controlling linear accelerator tracking and gating, ultrasound motion estimates must remain highly accurate throughout the imaging sequence. This study presents a temporal regularization method for correlation-based template matching which aims to improve the accuracy of motion estimates.

METHODS

Liver ultrasound sequences (15-23 Hz imaging rate, 2.5-5.5 min length) from ten healthy volunteers under free breathing were used. Anatomical features (blood vessels) in each sequence were manually annotated for comparison with normalized cross-correlation based template matching. Five sequences from a Siemens Acuson™ scanner were used for algorithm development (training set). Results from incremental tracking (IT) were compared with a temporal regularization method, which included a highly specific similarity metric and state observer, known as the α-β filter/similarity threshold (ABST). A further five sequences from an Elekta Clarity™ system were used for validation, without alteration of the tracking algorithm (validation set).

RESULTS

Overall, the ABST method produced marked improvements in vessel tracking accuracy. For the training set, the mean and 95th percentile (95%) errors (defined as the difference from manual annotations) were 1.6 and 1.4 mm, respectively (compared to 6.2 and 9.1 mm, respectively, for IT). For each sequence, the use of the state observer leads to improvement in the 95% error. For the validation set, the mean and 95% errors for the ABST method were 0.8 and 1.5 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-based motion estimation has potential to monitor liver translation over long time periods with high accuracy. Nonrigid motion (strain) and the quality of the ultrasound data are likely to have an impact on tracking performance. A future study will investigate spatial uniformity of motion and its effect on the motion estimation errors.

Intensity-Based Assessment of Microbubble-Enhanced Ultrasonography: Phase-Related Diagnostic Ability for Cellular Differentiation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

This prospective study aimed to elucidate the effect of phase-related quantitative parameters of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with perflubutane microbubble agent to assess the cellular differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Intensity was analyzed in 94 lesions (19.4 ± 4.9 mm, 86 patients), 47 well-differentiated HCCs (wHCCs) and 47 moderately-differentiated HCCs (mHCCs): I(e) (early phase) = I(te) (tumor) - I(le) (liver), I(p) (post-vascular phase) = I(tp) (tumor) - I(lp) (liver), I(ep) = I(e) - I(p). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve with the best cutoff value (I(e), 13.2, I(p), -4.5, I(ep), 21.3) for discriminating between wHCC and mHCC was 0.6922 for Ie, 0.7680 for Ip and 0.7925 for Iep, which indicated a significantly greater ability to differentiate between wHCC and mHCC compared with visual/qualitative assessment (early phase, 0.6170, p = 0.04; post-vascular phase, 0.6702, p = 0.01; both phases, 0.7021, p = 0.04). In conclusion, I(ep) was found to have the highest diagnostic ability, suggesting it is a promising parameter for the cellular differentiation of HCCs with CEUS.

Liver Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Improves Detection of Liver Metastases in Patients with Pancreatic or Periampullary Cancer

The aim of this study is to provide a diagnostic performance evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in detecting liver metastases in patients with suspected of pancreatic or periampullary cancer. Computed tomography (CT) is often insufficient for detection of liver metastases, but their presence plays a crucial role in the choice of therapy. Eighty-nine patients with suspected pancreatic or periampullary cancer were included in this prospective study with retrospective analysis. Patients underwent an abdominal CT and CEUS. Fifteen patients had liver metastases. The CT sensitivity was 73.3% (11/15), the specificity 93.2% (69/74), the positive predictive value (PPV) 68.8% (11/16) and the negative predictive value (NPV) 94.6% (69/73). Based on CEUS, the sensitivity was 80% (12/15), specificity 98.6% (73/74), PPV 92.3% (12/13) and NPV 96.1% (73/76). CEUS improved characterization of liver lesions in patients with suspected pancreatic or periampullary cancer compared with CT. CEUS can better detect benign liver lesions and distinguish false-positive or indeterminate CT results.

Hepatocellular carcinoma in children

Liver tumors are relatively rare in childhood, but may be associated with a range of diagnostic, genetic, therapeutic, and surgical challenges sufficient to tax even the most experienced clinician. This article outlines the epidemiology, etiology, pathologic condition, initial workup, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma in children and adolescents.

Benign liver lesions: grey-scale and contrast-enhanced ultrasound appearances

Ultrasound is often the first point of detection of liver lesions, with up to 75% of liver lesions detected at ultrasound having benign histology. In 2012, NICE issued recommendations that ultrasound contrast be used for the evaluation of incidentally discovered liver lesions. This has been demonstrated to provide a rapid and cost-effective evaluation for incidental liver lesions, in many cases precluding the need for further CT or MRI scans. The aim of this review is to demonstrate the ultrasound features of benign liver lesions, and to demonstrate their further characterisation with contrast ultrasound.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: advance and current status in abdominal imaging

In the field of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (US), contrast agents are classified as either first- or second-generation agents depending on the gas within the microbubbles. In the case of first-generation contrast agents, a high-mechanical-index technique is used and only intermittent scanning is possible due to the early destruction of the microbubbles during the scanning. The use of second-generation contrast agents in a low-mechanical-index technique enables continuous scanning. Besides the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions, contrastenhanced US is helpful in the monitoring of radiofrequency ablation therapy and in the targeting step of an US-guided biopsy. Recently, there has been a demand for new criteria to evaluate the treatment response obtained using anti-angiogenic agents because morphologic criteria alone may not reflect the treatment response of the tumor and contrast-enhanced US can provide quantitative markers of tissue perfusion. In spite of the concerns related to its cost-effectiveness, contrast-enhanced US has the potential to be more widely used as a complimentary tool or to substitute the current imaging modalities in some occasions.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the differentiation of benign and malignant focal liver lesions: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

International guidelines of Ultrasound recommend the performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as the first method of choice after conventional ultrasound for the diagnostic work-up of focal liver lesions. However, these recommendations are based on the results of multiple single studies and only few large multicentre studies.

AIMS

The rationale of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the overall sensitivity and specificity of CEUS for the diagnosis of malignant liver lesions.

METHODS

Literature databases were searched up to March 2012. Inclusion criteria were evaluation of CEUS, assessment of sensitivity and specificity of CEUS for the diagnosis of malignant liver lesions. The meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model based on the DerSimonian Laird method. Quality analyses were carried out to assess sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 45 studies with 8147 focal liver lesions were included in the analysis. Overall sensitivity and specificity of CEUS for the diagnosis of malignant liver lesions was 93% (95%-CI: 91-95%) and 90% (95%-CI: 88-92%) respectively. Significant heterogeneity was found between studies. However, subanalysis revealed no significant difference when evaluating studies using histology for all liver lesions, when comparing high-quality and low-quality studies, and blinded vs non-blinded studies.

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis support the international recommendations on CEUS for the diagnostic work-up of focal liver lesions selecting patients who need further diagnostics.

Current consensus and guidelines of contrast enhanced ultrasound for the characterization of focal liver lesions

The application of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) is considered essential when evaluating focal liver lesions (FLLs) using ultrasonography (US). Microbubble UCAs are easy to use and robust; their use poses no risk of nephrotoxicity and requires no ionizing radiation. The unique features of contrast enhanced US (CEUS) are not only noninvasiveness but also real-time assessing of liver perfusion throughout the vascular phases. The later feature has led to dramatic improvement in the diagnostic accuracy of US for detection and characterization of FLLs as well as the guidance to therapeutic procedures and evaluation of response to treatment. This article describes the current consensus and guidelines for the use of UCAs for the FLLs that are commonly encountered in US. After a brief description of the bases of different CEUS techniques, contrast-enhancement patterns of different types of benign and malignant FLLs and other clinical applications are described and discussed on the basis of our experience and the literature data.

Radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a literature review

Liver metastases occur in up to 60% of patients with colorectal cancer, and the control of liver metastases is considered to be of primary importance because it is a critical factor in determining prognosis. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy is one of the least invasive techniques for unresectable hepatic malignancies and can be performed safely using percutaneous, laparoscopic, or open surgical techniques. The local tumor progression rates after RFA for colorectal liver metastases range from 8.8% to 40.0%, and 5-year survival rates range from 20.0% to 48.5%. No prospective, randomized trials comparing the efficacy of RFA with that of surgical resection for colorectal liver metastases are currently available. However, some retrospective studies have reported that patients who received RFA had a survival rate similar to that observed in surgically treated groups, while other studies have reported better survival among patients who underwent surgical resection. The use of a laparoscopic or open surgical approach allows the repeated placement of RFA electrodes at multiple sites to ablate larger tumors. An accurate evaluation of treatment response is very important for the success of RFA therapy because a sufficient safety margin (at least 0.5 cm) can prevent local tumor progression. This review critically summarizes the current status of RFA for liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Characterization of hepatic lesions (≤ 30 mm) with liver-specific contrast agents: a comparison between ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

Imaging-based differentiation of hepatic lesions (≤ 30 mm) between well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas (w-HCC) and regenerative nodules (RN) presents difficulties. The aim was to compare the diagnostic abilities to differentiate w-HCC from RN using contrast-enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) both with liver-specific contrast agents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study included 67 pathologically proven hepatic lesions (17.5 ± 5.4mm, 54 w-HCCs, 13 RNs) in 56 patients with chronic hepatitis/cirrhosis (male 40, female 16; 29-79y). Hepatic-arterial/liver-specific phase enhancements were assessed quantitatively by ultrasound with perflubutane microbubble agent and MRI with gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine with respect to the histological findings.

RESULTS

Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of hepatic-arterial phase hyper-enhancement for w-HCC were 59.3%, 100% and 67.2% by ultrasound and 46.3%, 100% and 56.7% by MRI without significant difference. Meanwhile, those of liver-specific-phase hypo-enhancement for w-HCC were 44.4%, 100% and 55.2% by ultrasound and 87.0% (p<0.0001), 46.2% (p=0.0052) and 79.1% (p=0.0032) by MRI. Diagnostic accuracies for w-HCC by area under the receiver operating characteristic curves were higher in the hepatic-arterial phase in ultrasound (0.8316) than MRI (0.6659, p=0.0101) and similar in the liver-specific phase in ultrasound (0.7225) and MRI (0.7347, p=0.8814).

CONCLUSIONS

Hypervascularity is a significant feature which distinguishes w-HCC from RN, and ultrasound exerts a beneficial impact better than MRI for such characterization. However, both imaging have comparable abilities in the characterization of non-hypervascular lesions, compensating mutually for the poor sensitivity of ultrasound and the poor specificity of MRI in the liver-specific phase.

Vascularisation pattern of chronic pancreatitis compared with pancreatic carcinoma: results from contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound

Discriminating between focal chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer is always a challenge in clinical medicine. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound using Doppler techniques can uniquely reveal different vascularisation patterns in pancreatic tissue alterated by chronic inflammatory processes and even allows a discrimination from pancreatic cancer. This paper will describe the basics of contrast-enhanced high mechanical index endoscopic ultrasound (CEHMI EUS) and contrast enhanced low mechanical index endoscopic ultrasound (CELMI EUS) and explain the pathophysiological differences of the vascularisation of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma. Furthermore it will discuss how to use these techniques in daily clinical practice.

Heterogeneity of microbubble accumulation: a novel approach to discriminate between well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas and regenerative nodules

This prospective study aimed to elucidate the possibility of differentiating well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (wHCC) from regenerative nodule (RN) on the basis of the heterogeneity of microbubble accumulation. Intensity analysis was conducted on early-phase and late-phase (60 s and 900 s post-injection; perflubutane microbubble) harmonic sonograms in 33 focal hepatic lesions (≤ 15 mm; 30 patients with chronic liver disease) that were histologically proven as wHCC or RN. Heterogeneity of enhancement, an average of standard deviation of late-phase enhancement in three different sections in the lesions with late-phase iso-enhancement, was examined with respect to the histologic findings. Heterogeneity of enhancement was higher in wHCC (28.7 ± 3.8) than RN (19.8 ± 2.1, p = 0.0213) in the 29 late-phase iso-enhancement lesions. The best cut-off value of the heterogeneity for the diagnosis of wHCC was 25.58, and the sensitivity and specificity were 77.8% and 100%, respectively. A novel parameter, heterogeneity of microbubble accumulation, facilitates differentiation between wHCC and RN showing a late-phase, iso-enhancement appearance.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for characterisation of hepatic lesions appearing non-hypervascular on CT in chronic liver diseases

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this prospective study was to elucidate the efficacy of using contrast-enhanced ultrasound to characterise focal hepatic lesions appearing non-hypervascular on contrast-enhanced CT in chronic liver diseases.

METHODS

The study population included 22 patients with cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis, who between them had 27 focal hepatic lesions smaller than 20 mm (mean 13.9 ± 3.4) that appeared non-hypervascular on contrast-enhanced CT. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound with perflubutane microbubble agent (Sonazoid, 0.0075 ml kg(-1)) was performed prior to ultrasound-guided needle biopsy, and intensity analysis was done for hepatic lesions in the early phase (-60 s) and late phase (600 s post injection).

RESULTS

All seven early-phase hyperenhanced lesions were hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). 20 lesions iso- or hypoenhanced during the early phase consisted of 11 regenerative nodules (RNs) and 9 HCCs. HCC was more frequent in early-phase hyperenhanced lesions than in iso- or hypoenhanced lesions (p=0.0108). Both late-phase hypoenhanced lesions were HCCs, whereas 25 late-phase isoenhanced lesions consisted of 11 RNs and 14 HCCs. The enhancement patterns of the 11 RNs included isoenhanced appearance in both the early and late phases in 8 lesions, and early-phase hypoenhancement combined with late-phase isoenhancement in the remaining 3. Both of these enhancement patterns (i.e. either iso-iso or hypo-iso) were found in 9 malignant lesions, 9 (75%) of the 12 well-differentiated HCCs.

CONCLUSION

Hypervascularity on contrast-enhanced ultrasound with Sonazoid strongly suggested HCC regardless of non-hypervascularity on CT, and late-phase hypoenhancement was another possible finding of HCC. However, characterisation of hepatic lesions with other enhancement patterns was difficult using our technique.

Hepatic malignancies: Correlation between sonographic findings and pathological features

Ultrasonography (US) findings are inevitably based on pathological features. Knowledge of the pathological features of hepatic malignancies such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver metastasis and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is essential for correct US diagnosis and appropriate management. One type of hepatocarcinogenesis is step-wise development from a low-grade dysplastic nodule (DN), high-grade DN, high-grade DN with malignant foci, and well-differentiated HCC, to classical HCC. The intranodular blood supply changes in accordance with this progression. Moreover, the malignant potential tends to change as the macroscopic configuration progresses. Therefore, typical US findings of advanced HCC are a mosaic pattern, septum formation, peripheral sonolucency (halo), lateral shadow produced by fibrotic pseudocapsule, posterior echo enhancement, arterial hypervascularity with dilated intratumoral blood sinusoids, and perinodular daughter nodule formation. Bull's eye appearance is a common presentation of metastases from gastrointestinal (GI) adenocarcinomas, and represents histological findings that show an area of central necrosis surrounded by a zonal area of viable tumor. Thick zonal area reflects the layer of viable cells that are fed by minute tumor vessels. US imaging features of liver metastases from the GI tract are as follows: Bull's eye appearance, multiple masses, irregular tumor border, arterial rim-like enhancement, and hypoenhancement in the late vascular phase. Most intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas are ductal adenocarcinomas. The bile ducts peripheral to the tumor are usually dilated because of obstruction by tumors. US imaging features of mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma are as follows: peripheral bile duct dilatation, irregular tumor border, arterial enhancement due to minute intratumoral blood sinusoids, and hypoenhancement in the late vascular phase.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of malignant mesenchymal liver tumors

PURPOSE

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound can differentiate malignant from benign hepatic tumors, but has not been studied in malignant mesenchymal liver tumors.

METHODS

We describe the findings of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in a cohort of five patients with histological-proven malignant hepatic mesenchymal tumors.

RESULTS

The presence of imaging features such as peripheral (nodular) enhancement, chaotic central vascularization, and absence of contrast enhancement in the late phase allowed differentiation from hemangiomas.

CONCLUSIONS

If these findings are demonstrated in large hepatic tumors, then the diagnosis of hemangioma is unlikely and further workup is necessary.

Hypervascular liver masses on contrast-enhanced ultrasound: the importance of washout

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to determine the role of negative enhancement (washout), its presence and timing, in the differential diagnosis of hypervascular liver masses on contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One-hundred forty-six hypervascular liver lesions (mean size, 3.9 cm; range, 1.0-17.0 cm) were evaluated with contrast-enhanced ultrasound over a 6-month period. Seventy-four were benign (29 hemangiomas, 31 focal nodular hyperplasia [FNH] lesions, seven adenomas, five inflammatory lesions, two other) and 72, malignant (41 hepatocellular carcinomas [HCCs], 25 metastases, six other). Two independent reviewers retrospectively recorded the presence and timing of washout in the portal venous phase, observing until 4 minutes after injection, of a contrast agent (perflutren microspheres). Diagnoses were confirmed by histopathology (n = 68) or clinicoradiologic follow-up (n = 78). Timing of washout was compared between types of lesion using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Washout occurred in both benign (27/74, 36%) and malignant (70/72, 97%) lesions but was more frequently seen in malignancy (p < 0.001) (kappa = 0.91). Metastases showed more rapid washout than HCCs (p < 0.001): 20 of 25 metastases showed washout by 30 seconds after injection and 23 of 41 HCCs, later than 75 seconds. All malignant lesions without washout were HCCs (2/41). Among the benign lesions, all five inflammatory lesions showed rapid washout before 75 seconds and six of seven adenomas showed washout, mostly later than 75 seconds (5/6). Washout also occurred in hemangiomas (6/29) and FNH lesions (9/31), mostly later than 75 seconds after injection (12/15).

CONCLUSION

Hypervascular malignant lesions show washout except infrequent cases of HCC. Rapid washout characterizes metastases, whereas HCCs show variable, often slow, washout. However, washout is not unique to malignancy and may be seen in benign lesions.

Contrast enhanced ultrasound of renal masses

Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has gained clinical importance over the last years for the characterization of hepatic masses. Its role in extrahepatic indications has been investigated repeatedly but has been less comprehensively studied. Currently more than 50% of renal masses are incidentally diagnosed, mostly by B-mode ultrasound. The method of choice for characterization of renal lesions is contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT). In the case of cystic lesions CECT refers to the Bosniak classification for cystic lesions to assess the risk of malignant behavior. The majority of masses are renal cell carcinoma, but the exact proportion is controversial. Disadvantages of CECT are a significant risk for patients with impaired renal function, allergic reactions and hyperthyroidism due to iodinated contrast agents. Several studies concerning CEUS for the characterization of both solid and cystic renal lesions have been published, but prospective multicenter studies are missing, the presented data being mainly descriptive. The aim of the this manuscript is to review the current literature for CEUS in renal masses, to summarize the available data and focus on possible concepts for studies in the future.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound with SonoVue: differentiation between benign and malignant focal liver lesions in 317 patients

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to investigate the ability of contrast-enhanced sonography (CEUS) with the contrast agent SonoVue to differentiate between benign and malignant focal liver lesions.

METHODS

In a prospective study, we examined 317 patients (204 males, 113 females, aged 59 +/- 12 years) with focal liver lesions detected by B-mode gray-scale sonography. After intravenous injection of 1.2 mL SonoVue, the liver was examined continuously for 3 minutes using low-MI sonography with contrast-specific software. Final diagnosis was established by histopathology, CT, MRI, or HIDA-scintigraphy.

RESULTS

Two hundred nine patients had malignant focal lesions, including 107 hepatocellular carcinomas, 70 metastases, 26 cholangiocellular carcinomas, and 6 other types of malignancy. One hundred eight patients had benign focal lesions, including 30 regenerative nodules, 30 hemangiomas, 13 cases of focal nodular hyperplasia, 12 abscesses, 8 cases of necrosis, 7 cases of focal steatosis areas, and 8 other benign lesions. Hypoenhancement or no enhancement in the late phase was found in 91% of the malignant lesions but in only 37% of the benign lesions (p < 0.001, sensitivity = 64%, specificity = 93%). Hyperenhancement in the late phase was found in 20% of the benign lesions but in none of the malignant lesions (p < 0.001, sensitivity = 21%, specificity = 100%). Hyperenhancement in the early phase with diffuse complete enhancement was found in 30% of the patients with malignant lesions but in only 2% of the patients with benign lesions (p < 0.001, sensitivity = 30%, specificity = 98%). CEUS had a sensitivity of 90%, a specificity of 99%, and an accuracy of 89% in the diagnosis of malignant liver lesions.

CONCLUSION

CEUS is helpful in the differentiation between benign and malignant focal liver lesions.

Detection Of Focal Liver Lesions In Cirrhotic Liver Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

Patients with liver cirrhosis are at increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Conventional or baseline ultrasound (BUS) is often used as the first-line tool for HCC surveillance or detection, but the accuracy of BUS in HCC detection or differentiation from other focal liver lesions (FLLs) is limited. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) represents a recent revolution in the field of ultrasonography and it has become increasingly important in the detection and evaluation of FLLs. In CEUS, HCC typically exhibits arterial hyper-enhancement and portal-venous washout represented by hypo-enhanced lesions in the portal venous and late phases. The detection rate of HCC was significantly higher with CEUS compared with BUS. Even regenerative or some dysplastic nodules may exhibit arterial hyper-enhancement as they are differentiated from HCC by its iso-enhancing pattern in portal and late phases. The contrast-enhancement patterns of other different types of benign and malignant FLLs, as well as their detection rates with CEUS, were also discussed.

A benign tumour of the liver mimicking malignant liver disease--cholangiocellular adenoma

OBJECTIVE

To describe three patients with liver lesions mimicking malignant tumours diagnosed finally, using contrast-enhanced ultrasound, as cholangiocellular adenoma (bile duct adenoma).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Focal liver lesions found incidentally in three patients. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound was with use of Siemens or Esaote equipment, low MI technique, after an intravenous bolus of 2.4 ml Sonovue (Bracco, Italy).

RESULTS

Lesions were 9 mm, 15 mm and 20 mm in diameter and all were enhanced in the arterial phase and hypo-enhanced in the portal venous and late phases, suggesting their malignant nature. In two patients, no primary liver tumour was found, and in the third patient, previously resected for breast cancer, a tissue specimen was considered useful for characterizing tumour receptors for more targeted chemotherapy, the lesion being assumed metastatic in nature. Transcutaneous core biopsies were performed in all three patients. Pathological analysis (including the reference pathology) revealed cholangiocellular adenoma in all of them.

CONCLUSION

Cholangiocellular adenoma is a rare entity and can be a reason for possible false malignant diagnosis using contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Follow-up examinations are recommended.

Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography for evaluation of the enhancement patterns of focal liver tumors in the late phase by intermittent imaging with a high mechanical index

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the enhancement patterns of focal liver tumors in the late phase of Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography by intermittent imaging with a high mechanical index (MI).

METHODS

A total of 142 patients with 208 lesions, including 109 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), 61 metastases, 30 hemangiomas, and 8 focal nodular hyperplasias (FNHs), were enrolled in this prospective study. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with intermittent scanning at 2 frames per second (MI, 0.7-1.2) was conducted in the late phase (>5 minutes after bolus intravenous injection of the perflubutane-based contrast agent Sonazoid; Daiichi Sankyo, Tokyo, Japan). Two blinded readers classified the enhancement patterns of the lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of the dominant enhancement patterns and inter-reader agreement were assessed.

RESULTS

A combination of diffuse enhancement with intratumoral vessels and intratumoral vessels alone yielded sensitivity of 85% (average of both readers), specificity of 88%, and a PPV of 88% for HCC. For metastasis, a combination of peripheral ringlike enhancement with peritumoral vessels and peripheral ringlike enhancement with intratumoral vessels yielded sensitivity of 79%, specificity of 95%, and a PPV of 85%. For hemangiomas, a combination of peripheral nodular enhancement with peritumoral vessels and peripheral nodular enhancement without peritumoral vessels yielded sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 99%, and a PPV of 92%. Diffuse enhancement with spoked wheel arteries yielded sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 100%, and a PPV of 87% for FNHs. Good inter-reader agreement was achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography using intermittent imaging with a high MI can potentially be used for evaluating the enhancement patterns of focal liver tumors in the late phase.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with SonoVue: differentiation between benign and malignant lesions of the spleen

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with SonoVue (Bracco SpA, Milan, Italy), a sulfur hexafluoride microbubble contrast agent, to reveal differences between benign and malignant focal splenic lesions.

METHODS

In a prospective study we investigated 35 lesions in 35 patients (24 male and 11 female; mean age +/- SD, 54 +/- 15 years) with focal splenic lesions detected by B-mode ultrasonography. After intravenous injection of 1.2 to 2.4 mL of SonoVue, the spleen was examined continuously for 3 minutes using low-mechanical index ultrasonography with contrast-specific software. The final diagnosis was established by histologic examination, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

In 14 patients, the splenic lesions were malignant (metastasis, n = 6; non-Hodgkin lymphoma, n = 6; and Hodgkin lymphoma, n = 2). In 21 patients, the focal splenic lesions were benign (ischemic lesion, n = 6; echogenic cyst, n = 5; abscess, n = 4; hemangioma, n = 3; hematoma, n = 1; hemophagocytosis syndrome, n = 1; and splenoma, n = 1. Typical findings for benign lesions were 2 arrival patterns: no contrast enhancement (neither in the early nor in the parenchymal phase; P < .05) and the beginning of contrast enhancement in the early phase followed by contrast enhancement in the parenchymal phase 60 seconds after injection. In contrast, the combination of contrast enhancement in the early phase followed by rapid wash-out and demarcation of the lesion without contrast enhancement in the parenchymal phase (60 seconds after injection) was typical for malignant lesions (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is helpful in the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions of the spleen.