Effectiveness of concomitant immunosuppressive therapy in suppressing the formation of antibodies to infliximab in Crohn's disease

Systematic review: Methotrexate-A poorly understood and underused medication in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Methotrexate, an immunosuppressant used for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) for over 30 years, remains underused compared to thiopurines.

AIMS

To review the efficacy, safety, optimal dosing and delivery regimens of methotrexate in adults with IBD.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of studies involving patients with IBD treated with methotrexate from inception to August 2023. All studies were included from the MEDLINE database via PubMed.

RESULTS

For Crohn's disease, we included eight randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 17 observational studies. Parenteral methotrexate effectively increased remission rates in steroid-dependent patients at 25 mg/week for 16 weeks and at 15 mg/week for maintenance. Methotrexate can be used in combination with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents to reduce immunogenicity. Data comparing thiopurines and methotrexate remain scarce. For ulcerative colitis (UC), we included five RCTs and 10 observational studies were included; there was no evidence to support the use of methotrexate in (UC). We extracted safety data from 17 studies; mild-to-moderate adverse effects were common. The incidence of liver fibrosis or cirrhosis was low.

CONCLUSION

Methotrexate is effective at inducing and maintaining remission in steroid-refractory Crohn's disease and can reduce anti-TNF-induced immunogenicity when used in combination therapy. Data regarding tolerance and safety are reassuring. These findings challenge preconceived ideas on methotrexate and suggest that it is a valid first-line conventional option for the treatment of mild-to-moderate Crohn's disease.

Biomarkers predicting the effect of anti-TNF treatment in paediatric and adult inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVES

Paediatric and adult inflammatory bowel disease (pIBD, aIBD) patients may lose response to anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) treatment within the first year. Adult-extrapolated weight-based dosing is incorrect in children, due to age-related pharmacokinetic differences. We investigated biomarkers for initial and maintenance of response to infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA), comparing pIBD and aIBD patients.

METHODS

In this prospective, observational study, pIBD (n = 24) and aIBD (n = 21) patients were included when initiating anti-TNF. Escalation from standard dosing and continued anti-TNF at 12 and 18 months were assessed. Biomarkers included clinical laboratory parameters, faecal calprotectin (FCP) and IFX trough levels (TLs). Plasma proteomics was performed in pIBD.

RESULTS

During our study, treatment escalation (in clinical loss of response) occurred more common in pIBD versus aIBD (p = 0.02). We established that IFX therapy escalation in pIBD patients was not due to low infliximab levels. We identified 9 pro-inflammatory proteins that were elevated in patients losing response.

CONCLUSION

Anti-TNF exposure-response relationship may be different in pIBD versus aIBD. No biomarkers for maintained response were identified, but 9 inflammatory proteins were of interest as potential predictors for loss of response in pIBD.

Vedolizumab, Adalimumab, and Methotrexate Combination Therapy in Crohn's Disease (EXPLORER)

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Although biologics have revolutionized the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD), an efficacy ceiling has been reached. Combining biologic therapies may improve remission rates.

METHODS

EXPLORER, a phase 4, single-arm, open-label study, evaluated triple combination therapy with vedolizumab (300 mg on day 1, weeks 2 and 6, and then every 8 weeks), adalimumab (160 mg on day 2, 80 mg at week 2, then 40 mg every 2 weeks), and methotrexate (15 mg weekly) in biologic-naïve patients with newly diagnosed, moderate- to high-risk CD. Endoscopic remission at week 26 (primary end point; Simple Endoscopic Score for CD ≤2), clinical remission at weeks 10 and 26 (secondary end point; Crohn's Disease Activity Index <150), and incidences of adverse events and serious adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 55 enrolled patients, the mean CD duration was 0.4 years, the mean baseline Simple Endoscopic Score for CD was 12.6, and the mean baseline Crohn's Disease Activity Index was 265.5. At week 26, 19 patients (34.5%) were in endoscopic remission. At weeks 10 and 26, 34 (61.8%) and 30 patients (54.5%), respectively, were in clinical remission. Post hoc Bayesian analysis showed that the probabilities that triple combination therapy produced a higher endoscopic remission rate (33.5%; 95% credible interval, 22.4-45.7) than placebo (14%), vedolizumab monotherapy (27%), or adalimumab monotherapy (30%) were 99.9% or higher, 86.3%, and 71.4%, respectively. Six patients had serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy resulted in endoscopic and clinical remission at week 26 in 34.5% and 54.5% of patients, respectively, with no safety signal related to the treatment regimen. This supports further evaluation of combination therapy in CD.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov number: NCT02764762.

Reactive Immunomodulator Addition to Infliximab Monotherapy Restores Clinical Response in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) receiving infliximab (IFX) commonly experience immunogenic loss of response (LOR) by formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). An immunomodulator (IMM) used in combination with initial IFX induction is known to reduce ADA development and improve clinical outcomes. We aimed to assess the impact of reactively adding an IMM to patients on IFX monotherapy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study and systematic review with meta-analysis of patients with IBD demonstrating immunologic LOR, with or without clinical LOR, that had an IMM (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, or methotrexate) reactively added (reactive combination therapy; rCT) to combat elevated ADAs and raise IFX level. Data were extracted for pooled effect size estimation using random-effects models, and ADA and IFX trough levels were compared pre- and post-IMM initiation.

RESULTS

We identified 6 patients who received rCT due to rising ADA titers and low IFX levels. Median ADA titer decreased from 506 ng/mL (interquartile range (IQR) [416-750]) to 76.5 ng/mL (IQR [25.8-232]), an 85% decrease (p = 0.031). Median IFX trough increased from 0.4 µg/mL (IQR [0.4-0.48]) to 8.25 µg/mL (IQR [3.7-9.6]), a 20.6-fold increase (p = 0.038). Meta-analysis pooled effect size of 7 studies with 89 patients showed an 87% ADA titer reduction [95% confidence interval (CI) = 72-94%], 6.7-fold increased IFX trough (95% CI = 2.4-18.7), and 76% clinical remission rescue rate (95% CI = 59-93%).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest rCT is a valid rescue strategy in patients with immunogenic LOR to IFX to reduce ADA titers, restore therapeutic IFX levels, and recapture clinical remission of IBD.

Discontinuation of therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: Current views

The timely introduction and adjustment of the appropriate drug in accordance with previously well-defined treatment goals is the foundation of the approach in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The therapeutic approach is still evolving in terms of the mechanism of action but also in terms of the possibility of maintaining remission. In patients with achieved long-term remission, the question of de-escalation or discontinuation of therapy arises, considering the possible side effects and economic burden of long-term therapy. For each of the drugs used in IBD (5-aminosalycaltes, immunomodulators, biological drugs, small molecules) there is a risk of relapse. Furthermore, studies show that more than 50% of patients who discontinue therapy will relapse. Based on the findings of large studies and meta-analysis, relapse of disease can be expected in about half of the patients after therapy withdrawal, in case of monotherapy with aminosalicylates, immunomodulators or biological therapy. However, longer relapse-free periods are recorded with withdrawal of medication in patients who had previously been on combination therapies immunomodulators and anti-tumor necrosis factor. It needs to be stressed that randomised clinical trials regarding withdrawal from medications are still lacking. Before making a decision on discontinuation of therapy, it is important to distinguish potential candidates and predictive factors for the possibility of disease relapse. Fecal calprotectin level has currently been identified as the strongest predictive factor for relapse. Several other predictive factors have also been identified, such as: High Crohn's disease activity index or Harvey Bradshaw index, younger age (< 40 years), longer disease duration (> 40 years), smoking, young age of disease onset, steroid use 6-12 months before cessation. An important factor in the decision to withdraw medication is the success of re-treatment with the same or other drugs. The decision to discontinue therapy must be based on individual approach, taking into account the severity, extension, and duration of the disease, the possibility of side adverse effects, the risk of relapse, and patient's preferences.

First Mexican Consensus on Crohn's disease

INTRODUCTION

Crohn's disease (CD) is a subtype of chronic and incurable inflammatory bowel disease. It can affect the entire gastrointestinal tract and its etiology is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this consensus was to establish the most relevant aspects related to definitions, diagnosis, follow-up, medical treatment, and surgical treatment of Crohn's disease in Mexico.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Mexican specialists in the areas of gastroenterology and inflammatory bowel disease were summoned. The consensus was divided into five modules, with 69 statements. Applying the Delphi panel method, the pre-meeting questions were sent to the participants, to be edited and weighted. At the face-to-face meeting, all the selected articles were shown, underlining their level of clinical evidence; all the statements were discussed, and a final vote was carried out, determining the percentage of agreement for each statement.

RESULTS

The first Mexican consensus on Crohn's disease was produced, in which recommendations for definitions, classifications, diagnostic aspects, follow-up, medical treatment, and surgical treatment were established.

CONCLUSIONS

Updated recommendations are provided that focus on definitions, classifications, diagnostic criteria, follow-up, and guidelines for conventional medical treatment, biologic therapy, and small molecule treatment, as well as surgical management.

Effectiveness and Tolerability of Methotrexate Combined with Biologics in Patients with Crohn's Disease: A Multicenter Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Methotrexate (MTX) combination therapy with biological agents has gained increasing interest. Here, we assessed the efficacy and tolerability of the MTX combination therapy in patients with Crohn's disease (CD).

METHODS

We performed a multicenter observational study with 185 patients with CD with MTX and biologics combination therapy; the patients were recruited from three IBD Clinics in Korea. We evaluated the outcomes of the MTX combination therapy and examined the predictive factors of clinical and endoscopic remission.

RESULTS

MTX was administered orally to 62.7% of patients; the mean dose was 15.5 mg per week, and the mean treatment duration was 36 months. Of the 169 patients treated with MTX combination therapy for over 6 months, the steroid-free clinical remission rates were 34.3%, 26.0%, 29.8%, and 32.7% at 4, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. Previous thiopurine use was a significant negatively associated independent factor (p < 0.001), and a higher dose of MTX (≥ 15 mg/week) was a positively associated independent factor of steroid-free clinical remission (p = 0.035). Ninety-six patients underwent follow-up endoscopy after 28 months, and 36 (37.5%) achieved endoscopic remission. Longer disease duration (p = 0.006), ileocolonic type of Montreal location (p = 0.036), and baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) level of more than 5 mg/L (p = 0.035) were significant negatively associated independent factors and a higher dose of MTX (≥ 15 mg/week) was a positively associated independent factor of endoscopic remission (p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

MTX combination therapy with biologics was effective and tolerable in patients with CD.

Anti-infliximab antibodies and low infliximab levels correlate with drug discontinuation in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Infliximab (IFX) use is limited by loss of response often due to the development of anti-IFX antibodies and low drug levels.

METHODS

We performed a single center prospective observational cohort study of pediatric and young adult subjects with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on IFX with over 3 years of follow-up. Infliximab levels (IFXL) and antibodies to infliximab (ATI) were measured throughout the study. Subjects were followed until IFX was discontinued.

RESULTS

We enrolled 219 subjects with IBD (184: Crohn's disease; 33: Ulcerative colitis; and 2 Indeterminant colitis; 84 female, median age 14.4 years, 37% on concomitant immunomodulator). Nine hundred and nineteen serum samples (mean 4.2 ± 2.1 per patient) were tested for IFXL and ATI. During the study, 31 (14%) subjects discontinued IFX. Sixty patients had ATI. Twenty-two of those 60 patients with ATI discontinued IFX; 14 of 31 patients who discontinued IFX had detectable ATI at study onset. The combination of ATI and IFXL < 5 µg/mL at study entry was associated with the highest risk of drug discontinuation (hazard ratios [HR] ATI 4.27 [p < 0.001] and IFXL < 5 µg/mL [HR]: 3.2 p = 0.001). Patients with IFXL 5-10 µg/mL had the lowest rate of discontinuation (6%). IFX dose escalation eliminated ATI in 21 of 60 subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

ATI is a strong predictor of needing to stop IFX use and inversely correlates with IFXL. Detection of ATI during therapeutic drug monitoring postinduction but also periodically during maintenance therapy identifies individuals who may benefit from IFX dose escalation and/or the addition of an immunomodulator, as these interventions may reduce or eliminate ATI.

Personalized Treatment for Crohn's Disease: Current Approaches and Future Directions

Crohn's disease is a complex, relapsing and remitting inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract with a variable disease course. While the treatment options for Crohn's disease have dramatically increased over the past two decades, predicting individual patient response to treatment remains a challenge. As a result, patients often cycle through multiple different therapies before finding an effective treatment which can lead to disease complications, increased costs, and decreased quality of life. Recently, there has been increased emphasis on personalized medicine in Crohn's disease to identify individual patients who require early advanced therapy to prevent complications of their disease. In this review, we summarize our current approach to management of Crohn's disease by identifying risk factors for severe or disabling disease and tailoring individual treatments to patient-specific goals. Lastly, we outline our knowledge gaps in implementing personalized Crohn's disease treatment and describe the future directions in precision medicine.

A Review of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Receiving Combination Therapy

Background: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) impacts millions worldwide, presenting a major challenge to healthcare providers and patients. The advent of biologic therapies has enhanced the prognosis, but many patients exhibit primary or secondary non-response, underscoring the need for rigorous monitoring and therapy optimization to improve outcomes. Objective: This narrative review seeks to understand the role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in optimizing treatment for IBD patients, especially for those on combination therapies of biologics and immunomodulators. Methods: A comprehensive synthesis of the current literature was undertaken, focusing on the application, benefits, limitations, and future directions of TDM in patients receiving a combination of biologic therapies and immunomodulators. Results: While biological therapies have improved outcomes, rigorous monitoring and therapy optimization are needed. TDM has emerged as a pivotal strategy, enhancing outcomes cost-effectively while reducing adverse events. While most data pertain to monotherapies, TDM's applicability also extends to combination therapy. Conclusion: TDM plays a crucial role in the treatment optimization of IBD patients on combination therapies. Further research is needed to fully understand its potential and limitations in the broader context of IBD management.

Safety of Accelerated Infliximab Infusions in Children With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Accelerated infliximab (IFX) infusions have shown to be safe in adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but data on its safety in pediatric IBD is limited. This study aimed to assess the incidence and timing of infusion reactions (IR) in children with IBD who received accelerated (1-h) versus standard (2-h) IFX infusions.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included IBD patients 4-18 years of age and initiated IFX between January 2006 and November 2021 at Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location Academic Medical Centre (AMC) and VU Medical Centre (VUmc). The AMC protocol was adjusted in July 2019 from standard to accelerated infusions with 1-h intrahospital post-infusion observation period, whereas in VUmc only standard infusions were administered without an observation period. After merging the departments in 2022, all VUmc patients were allocated to the accelerated infusions (AMC) protocol. Primary outcome was the incidence of acute IR among maintenance accelerated versus standard infusions.

RESULTS

Totally, 297 (150 VUmc, 147 AMC) patients (221 Crohn disease; 65 ulcerative colitis; 11 IBD-unclassified) with cumulative n = 8381 IFX infusions were included. No statistically significant difference in the per-infusion incidence of IR was observed between maintenance standard infusions (26/4383, 0.6% of infusions) and accelerated infusions (9/3117, 0.3%) ( P = 0.33). Twenty-six of 35 IR (74%) occurred during the infusion, while 9 occurred post-infusion (26%). Only 3 of 9 IR developed in the intrahospital observation period following the switch to accelerated infusions. All post-infusion IR were mild, requiring no intervention or only oral medication.

CONCLUSIONS

Accelerated IFX infusion without a post-infusion observation period for children with IBD seems a safe approach.

Dual-Targeted Therapy in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comprehensive Review

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic systemic immune-mediated disorder. The disease is triggered and perpetuated by a complex interplay between genetic predisposition, dysregulated immune responses, and environmental factors. Pediatric IBD is considered to be more aggressive compared with adult-onset IBD, and commonly requires more intensive pharmacological and surgical treatments. Although the use of targeted therapy, such as biologic therapy and small molecule therapy, is on the rise, there are children with IBD who are refractory to all current therapeutic options. For them, a combination of biologic agents or a biologic agent with small molecules as dual-targeted therapy (DTT) may be a possible therapeutic option. The main indications for DTT are high inflammatory burden and refractoriness to standard therapy, extra-intestinal manifestations of IBD, adverse effects of therapy, and co-existing immune-mediated inflammatory disorders. Several combination therapies were described for pediatric refractory IBD. The main ones were anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents and vedolizumab (VDZ), anti-TNF and ustekinumab (UST), VDZ and UST, and biologic agents with tofacitinib. DTT exhibits high efficacy, with high rates of clinical response and remission as well as biomarker remission. The data on endoscopic and radiologic remission are scarce. Most of the adverse effects reported under DTT were mild; however, the serious ones that had been observed mandate a profoundly cautious approach when considering it. Triple immunosuppressive therapy and combinations of biologics with emergent therapies such as selective Janus kinase inhibitors, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators, and anti-interleukin-23 agents, are potential future regimens for children with IBD who are refractory to current therapeutic options. This review provides an update of publications on these issues.

Comparative Effectiveness of Anti-TNF in Combination With Low-Dose Methotrexate vs Anti-TNF Monotherapy in Pediatric Crohn's Disease: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, including infliximab and adalimumab, are a mainstay of pediatric Crohn's disease therapy; however, nonresponse and loss of response are common. As combination therapy with methotrexate may improve response, we performed a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pragmatic trial to compare tumor necrosis factor inhibitors with oral methotrexate to tumor necrosis factor inhibitor monotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with pediatric Crohn's disease initiating infliximab or adalimumab were randomized in 1:1 allocation to methotrexate or placebo and followed for 12-36 months. The primary outcome was a composite indicator of treatment failure. Secondary outcomes included anti-drug antibodies and patient-reported outcomes of pain interference and fatigue. Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) were collected.

RESULTS

Of 297 participants (mean age, 13.9 years, 35% were female), 156 were assigned to methotrexate (110 infliximab initiators and 46 adalimumab initiators) and 141 to placebo (102 infliximab initiators and 39 adalimumab initiators). In the overall population, time to treatment failure did not differ by study arm (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.45-1.05). Among infliximab initiators, there were no differences between combination and monotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.55-1.56). Among adalimumab initiators, combination therapy was associated with longer time to treatment failure (hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19-0.81). A trend toward lower anti-drug antibody development in the combination therapy arm was not significant (infliximab: odds ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.49-1.07; adalimumab: odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.24-2.07). No differences in patient-reported outcomes were observed. Combination therapy resulted in more AEs but fewer SAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Among adalimumab but not infliximab initiators, patients with pediatric Crohn's disease treated with methotrexate combination therapy experienced a 2-fold reduction in treatment failure with a tolerable safety profile.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov, Number: NCT02772965.

The Role of Low-Dose Oral Methotrexate in Increasing Anti-TNF Drug Levels and Reducing Immunogenicity in IBD

Concomitant immunomodulation is utilised in combination with anti-TNF therapy for IBD primarily to increase drug levels and prevent anti-drug antibody formation. Whilst thiopurines have traditionally been the immunomodulator of choice in IBD populations, there are concerns regarding the long-term safety of the prolonged use of these agents: particularly an association with lymphoproliferative disorders. Given this, we have explored the existing literature on the use of low-dose oral methotrexate as an alternative immunomodulator for this indication. Although there is a lack of data directly comparing the efficacies of methotrexate and thiopurines as concomitant immunomodulators, the available literature supports the use of methotrexate in improving the pharmacokinetics of anti-TNF agents. Furthermore, low-dose oral methotrexate regimens appear to have comparable efficacies to higher-dose parenteral administration and are better tolerated. We suggest that clinicians should consider the use of low-dose oral methotrexate as an alternative to thiopurines when the primary purpose of concomitant immunomodulation is to improve anti-TNF pharmacokinetics.

Infliximab vs adalimumab: Points to consider when selecting anti-tumor necrosis factor agents in pediatric patients with Crohn’s disease

Biologic agents with various mechanisms against Crohn’s disease (CD) have been released and are widely used in clinical practice. However, two anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents, infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL), are the only biologic agents approved by the Food and Drug Administration for pediatric CD currently. Therefore, in pediatric CD, the choice of biologic agents should be made more carefully to achieve the therapeutic goal. There are currently no head-to-head trials of biologic agents in pediatric or adult CD. There is a lack of accumulated data for pediatric CD, which requires the extrapolation of adult data for the positioning of biologics in pediatric CD. From a pharmacokinetic point of view, IFX is more advantageous than ADL when the inflammatory burden is high, and ADL is expected to be advantageous over IFX in sustaining remission in the maintenance phase. Additionally, we reviewed the safety profile, immunogenicity, preference, and compliance between IFX and ADL and provide practical insights into the choice of anti-TNF therapy in pediatric CD. Careful evaluation of clinical indications and disease behavior is essential when prescribing anti-TNF agents. In addition, factors such as the efficacy of induction and maintenance of remission, safety profile, immunogenicity, patient preference, and compliance play an important role in evaluating and selecting treatment options.

Validation of a rapid HLA-DQA1*05 pharmacogenomics assay to identify at-risk resistance to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy among patients with inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVES

The HLA-DQA1*05 variant (rs2097432) is associated with increased risk of immunogenicity to tumor necrosis factor antagonists, with subsequent resistance to therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Identification of these patients would optimize personalized therapeutic selection.

METHODS

Genomic DNA was extracted from 80 deidentified samples in an unselected patient population with an unknown rs2097432 genotype. Split sample analysis was performed using a reference laboratory. Primer probes for a TaqMan quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were custom designed. Synthesized genomic-block fragments were used as controls. All qPCR reactions were performed using a TaqMan GTXpress Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) on the Applied Biosystems 7500 system under fast cycling conditions.

RESULTS

Of 80 samples, 50% were wild-type reference genotypes, 22.5% were heterozygous, and 27.5% were homozygous variant calls, comparable to population data. Split analysis samples between 2 independent laboratories were 100% concordant. The detection limit tested across genomic-block controls processed in duplicate was reproducible on sample input from 10 ng titrated down to 1.25 ng across 2 independent runs. Further, analytical specificity assessed with previous wild-type reference and homozygous variant DNA spiked into genomic-block controls produced appropriate heterozygous genotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Here we present validation of a lab-developed test for a rapid HLA-DQA1*05 (rs2097432) pharmacogenomics assay targeting a hotspot identified by genome-wide association studies. Targeted genotyping employed here will allow for expeditious personalized therapeutic selection.

Advances in Current Drugs and Formulations for the Management of Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory skin disease with a complex pathophysiology. Treatment of AD remains challenging owing to the presence of a wide spectrum of clinical phenotypes and limited response to existing therapies. However, recent genetic, immunological, and pathophysiological insights into the disease mechanism resulted in the invention of novel therapeutic drug candidates. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current therapies and assesses various novel drug delivery strategies currently under clinical investigation. Further, this review majorly emphasizes on various topical treatments including emollient therapies, barrier repair agents, topical corticosteroids (TCS), phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors, calcineurin inhibitors, and Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway inhibitors. It also discusses biological and systemic therapies, upcoming treatments based on ongoing clinical trials. Additionally, this review scrutinized the use of pharmaceutical inactive ingredients in the approved topical dosage forms for AD treatment.

Combination therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: Current evidence and perspectives

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) are chronic nonspecific intestinal inflammatory diseases with a relapsing-remitting course, including Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Crohn's Disease (CD). Combination therapy has been proposed as a strategy to enhance treatment efficacy in IBD. The aim of this study is to summarize current evidence and perspectives on combination therapies in IBD.

METHODS

Electronic databases such as PubMed, Ovid Embase, Medline, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched to identify relevant studies.

RESULTS

Current evidence supports that the combination of infliximab and thiopurines is more effective than monotherapy in inducing and maintaining remission in IBD. Data on the combination of other biological agents such as adalimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and immunosuppressors is lacking or showed conflicting results. Vedolizumab seems a potentially effective maintenance regimen after calcineurin inhibitors-based rescue therapy in acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). Dual Targeted Therapy, which is the combination of two biological agents and/or small molecules, might be a reasonable choice in patients with concomitant IBD and extraintestinal manifestations, or in patients with medical-refractory IBD who lack valid alternatives. Some safety concerns such as adverse events (serious and opportunistic infections) and malignancies (lymphoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer) were raised in combination therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapies seem to be effective in some IBD patients such as refractory IBD patients or patients with extraintestinal manifestations, but it might be associated with an increased risk of adverse events and malignancies.

THE EVALUATION OF INFLIXIMAB TROUGH LEVEL FAVORS MAINTENANCE THERAPY OF PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE

BACKGROUND

Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are chronic diseases that result from the deregulation of the mucosal immune system of the gastrointestinal tract. The use of biological therapies, including infliximab (IFX), is one of the strategies to treat both CD and UC. The IFX treatment is monitored by complementary tests, namely: fecal calprotectin (FC); C-reactive protein (CRP); and endoscopic and cross-sectional imaging. Besides, serum IFX evaluation and antibody detection are also used.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate trough levels (TL) and antibodies in a population with inflammatory bowel (IBD) disease undergoing treatment with IFX, and the factors that might impact the treatment effectiveness.

METHODS

Retrospective, cross-sectional study with patients with IBD that were assessed for TL and antibody (ATI) levels in a southern Brazilian hospital, from June 2014 to July 2016.

RESULTS

The study assessed 55 patients (52.7% female) submitted to serum IFX and antibody evaluations (95 blood samples, 55 first test; 30 second test, and 10 as third testing. Forty-five (47.3%) cases were diagnosed with CD (81.8%), and ten with UC (18.2%). Serum levels were adequate in 30 samples (31.57%), subtherapeutic in 41 (43.15%), and supratherapeutic in 24 (25.26%). IFX dosages were optimized for 40 patients (42.10%), maintained for 31 (32.63%), and discontinued for 7 (7.60%). The intervals between infusions were shortened in 17.85% of the cases. In 55 tests (55.79%), the therapeutic approach was exclusively defined according to IFX and/or serum antibody levels. The assessment of patients one year later indicated that: the approach was maintained with IFX for thirty-eight patients (69.09%); the class of biological agent was changed for eight (14.54%); changes using the same class of biological agent occurred for two patients (3.63%); the medication was discontinued and not replaced for three patients (5.45%), and four patients (7.27%) were lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSION

There were no differences in TL between groups with or without immunosuppressants, serum albumin (ALB), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), FC, CRP, and endoscopic and imaging examinations. Current therapeutic approach could be maintained for almost 70% of patients. Thus, serum and antibody levels are a useful tool in the follow-up of patients undergoing maintenance therapy and after treatment induction in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Efficacy of Infliximab in Disease Control of Refractory Orbital Myositis

PURPOSE

Orbital myositis is a common cause of orbital inflammation with localized involvement of the extra ocular muscles. This study aimed to assess the value of infliximab in controlling orbital myositis and reducing its relapse rate.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of all consecutive patients with orbital myositis treated with infliximab between 2007 and 2016. We examined change in corticosteroid and immunomodulatory doses as well as relapse rates following treatment with infliximab.

RESULTS

The study included seven patients with an average follow up of 19 ± 13.4 months. The mean dose of systemic corticosteroid was reduced from 28.57 ± 14.35 mg/day at the time of infliximab initiation to 7.00 ± 6.83 mg/day at final follow-up (p = .003). Long-term remission was achieved in 85.7% (n = 6).

CONCLUSION

This study supports the role of infliximab in treating refractory orbital myositis and this was associated with clinical improvement, decreasing relapse rate with dose reduction of conventional treatment.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Practice for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To outline the development, rationale, and practical use of therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Therapeutic drug monitoring is traditionally discussed in terms of a proactive or reactive approach. However, these terms are not always consistently defined and can be confusing when translating research to clinical practice. Personalized approaches incorporating clinical context and precision medicine are emerging. Personalized therapeutic drug monitoring combines a structured and proactive strategy for monitoring biologic concentrations as well as identification of antidrug antibody development or subtherapeutic dosing in the setting of loss of response. Optimizing biologic therapy can improve outcomes and avoid loss of response. Why, when, and how we measure drug troughs and anti-drug antibodies is a moving target, though what is known is that the appropriate and evidence-based use of this practice prevents adverse events and improves outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes for Standard Versus Nonstandard Induction Dosing of Infliximab for Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease

OBJECTIVE

Recent studies have emphasized the early use of infliximab (IFX) in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Standard dosing of 5 mg/kg/dose may not be sufficient to achieve optimal clinical outcomes. The aim of our study was to compare short-term outcomes with standard dosing of IFX to higher, nonstandard dosing of IFX for induction therapy.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 162 pediatric patients receiving either standard (5–6 mg/kg, n = 90) or nonstandard (&gt;6 mg/kg, n = 72) dosing of IFX during induction was performed. Patient demographics, clinical outcomes, and laboratory data were collected. Need for dose escalation during the first 6 months, combination therapy with immunomodulators, and steroid-free progression were investigated.

RESULTS

Clinical remission rates between the 2 groups were significantly different, with patients receiving nonstandard dosing demonstrating higher rates (58% vs 78%; p = 0.012). Use of combination therapy with immunomodulators was significantly different between standard and nonstandard groups (80% vs 48%; p &lt; 0.001). Numeric trend in need for IFX dose escalation in the first 6 months was seen between standard and nonstandard groups (54% vs 39%, respectively; p = 0.087). Post-induction IFX trough concentrations, rates of antibody development, drug discontinuation, and infusion reaction were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonstandard induction dosing of IFX was associated with higher rates of clinical remission, despite similar rates of serum IFX trough concentrations. There was a numeric trend towards the standard group requiring dose escalation within the first 6 months of therapy. Patients given nonstandard dosing may achieve superior clinical outcomes compared with those on standard dosing.

Risk factors for anti-drug antibody formation to infliximab: Secondary analyses of a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Anti-drug antibodies (ADAb) frequently form early in the treatment course of infliximab and other tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, leading to treatment failure and adverse events.

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for ADAb in the early phase of infliximab treatment.

METHODS

Patients (n = 410) with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases who initiated infliximab treatment were included in the 38-week Norwegian Drug Monitoring Trial (NOR-DRUM) A and randomised 1:1 to therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) or standard therapy. Serum levels of infliximab and ADAb were measured at each infusion. Possible risk factors for ADAb formation were assessed using logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

ADAb were detected in 78 (19%) patients. A diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (odds ratio [OR], 1.9 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-3.6]) and lifetime smoking (OR, 2.0 [CI 1.1-3.6]) were baseline risk factors, while baseline use of concomitant immunosuppressors (OR, 0.4 [CI 0.2-0.8]) and a diagnosis of spondyloarthritis (SpA) (OR, 0.4 [CI 0.2-0.8]) reduced the risk of ADAb. Higher disease activity during follow-up (OR, 1.1 [CI 1.0-1.1]) and "drug holidays" of more than 11 weeks (OR, 4.1 [CI 1.2-13.8]) increased the risk of ADAb, whereas higher infliximab doses (OR, 0.1 [CI 0.0-0.3) and higher serum infliximab concentrations (OR, 0.7 [CI 0.6-0.8]) reduced the risk of immunogenicity.

CONCLUSION

Several risk factors for ADAb formation during early-phase infliximab treatment were identified. This knowledge provides a basis for treatment strategies to mitigate the formation of ADAb and identify patients in whom these measures are of particular importance.

The emerging microbiome-based approaches to IBD therapy: From SCFAs to urolithin A

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a group of chronic gastrointestinal inflammatory conditions which can be life-threatening, affecting both children and adults. Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are the two main forms of IBD. The pathogenesis of IBD is complex and involves genetic background, environmental factors, alteration in gut microbiota, aberrant immune responses (innate and adaptive), and their interactions, all of which provide clues to the identification of innovative diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers and the development of novel treatments. Gut microbiota provide significant benefits to its host, most notably via maintaining immunological homeostasis. Furthermore, changes in gut microbial populations may promote immunological dysregulation, resulting in autoimmune diseases, including IBD. Investigating the interaction between gut microbiota and immune system of the host may lead to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of IBD as well as the development of innovative immune- or microbe-based therapeutics. In this review we summarized the most recent findings on innovative therapeutics for IBD, including microbiome-based therapies such as fecal microbiota transplantation, probiotics, live biotherapeutic products, short-chain fatty acids, bile acids, and urolithin A.

Short interruptions of TNF-inhibitor treatment can be associated with treatment failure in patients with immune-mediated diseases

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of immune-mediated diseases has increased in the past decades and despite the use of biological treatments all patients do not achieve remission. The aim of this study was to characterise the reasons for short interruptions during treatment with two commonly used TNF-inhibitors infliximab and adalimumab and to analyse the possible effects of the interruptions on immunisation and switching the treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This case-control study was based on retrospective analyses of patient records and a questionnaire survey to clinicians. A total of 370 patients (194 immunised cases and 172 non-immunised controls, 4 excluded) were enrolled from eight hospitals around Finland. Eleven different diagnoses were represented, and the largest patient groups were those with inflammatory bowel or rheumatic diseases.

RESULTS

Treatment interruptions were associated with immunisation in patients using infliximab (p < .001) or adalimumab (p < .000001). Patients with treatment interruptions were more likely to have been treated with more than one biological agent compared to those without treatment interruptions. This was particularly prominent among patients with a rheumatic disease (p < .00001). The most frequent reason for a treatment interruption among the cases was an infection, whereas among the control patients it was remission. The median length of one interruption was one month (interquartile range 1-3 months).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the interruptions of the treatment with TNF-inhibitors expose patients to immunisation and increase the need for drug switching. These findings stress the importance of careful judgement of the need for a short interruption in the biological treatment in clinical work, especially during non-severe infections.

Differential Serum-intestinal Dynamics of Infliximab and Adalimumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Therapeutic drug monitoring is used to guide anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] therapy. However, the associations between serum drug levels [SDL], TNF-bound, and free anti-TNF in the target tissue are incompletely defined. We aimed to assess the interactions between these parameters in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients.

METHODS: ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT

assays [ELISA assays] were used to detect free drug and TNF-drug complexes in intestinal tissues. Concurrent SDL, anti-drug antibodies [ADA], pharmacotherapy, clinical response, endoscopic appearance, and histological severity were determined. Comparisons between anti-TNFs and paired inflamed/non-inflamed tissue were performed. Variables were correlated and potential interactions detected using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 95 biopsies taken from 49 anti-TNF treated IBD patients [26 receiving infliximab and 23 adalimumab] were studied. Free drug levels were higher in inflamed compared with non-inflamed paired specimens. Tissue free-drug and TNF-drug complexes levels were higher in adalimumab-treated patients. In adalimumab-treated patients, SDL were correlated with free drug, but not TNF-drug complex levels, in both inflamed and non-inflamed segments. In infliximab-treated patients, higher SDL were associated with the presence of tissue free drug in both inflamed and non-inflamed segments, whereas TNF-drug complexes were mostly detected in non-inflamed but not in inflamed tissue. In the presence of ADA, neither free drug nor TNF-infliximab complexes were measured in the tissue. Tissue levels did not correlate well with clinical, endoscopic, or histological scores.

CONCLUSIONS

SDL correlated with tissue free drug levels; however, different dynamics were observed for TNF-drug complex levels. Infliximab and adalimumab tissue drug dynamics differ. Better understanding of these interactions may allow future therapeutic optimisation.

Comparative Acceptability of Therapeutic Maintenance Regimens in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Results From the Nationwide ACCEPT2 Study

BACKGROUND

Owing to growing number of therapeutic options with similar efficacy and safety, we compared the acceptability of therapeutic maintenance regimens in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

From a nationwide study (24 public or private centers), IBD patients were consecutively included for 6 weeks. A dedicated questionnaire including acceptability numerical scales (ANS) ranging from 0 to 10 (highest acceptability) was administered to both patients and related physicians.

RESULTS

Among 1850 included patients (65.9% with Crohn's disease), the ANS were 8.68 ± 2.52 for oral route (first choice in 65.8%), 7.67 ± 2.94 for subcutaneous injections (first choice in 21.4%), and 6.79 ± 3.31 for intravenous infusions (first choice in 12.8%; P < .001 for each comparison). In biologic-naïve patients (n = 315), the most accepted maintenance regimens were oral intake once (ANS = 8.8 ± 2.2) or twice (ANS = 6.9 ± 3.4) daily and subcutaneous injections every 12 or 8 weeks (ANS = 7.9 ± 3.0 and ANS = 7.2 ± 3.2, respectively). Among 342 patients with prior exposure to subcutaneous biologics, the preferred regimens were subcutaneous injections (≥2 week-intervals; ANS between 9.1 ± 2.3 and 8.1 ± 2.7) and oral intake once daily (ANS = 7.7 ± 3.2); although it was subcutaneous injections every 12 or 8 weeks (ANS = 8.4 ± 3.0 and ANS = 8.1 ± 3.0, respectively) and oral intake once daily (ANS = 7.6 ± 3.1) in case of prior exposure to intravenous biologics (n = 1181). The impact of usual therapeutic escalation or de-escalation was mild (effect size <0.5). From patients' acceptability perspective, superiority and noninferiority cutoff values should be 15% and 5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although oral intake is overall preferred, acceptability is highly impacted by the rhythm of administration and prior medication exposures. However, SC treatment with long intervals between 2 injections (≥8 weeks) and oral intake once daily seems to be the most accepted modalities.

Infliximab trough level combined with inflammatory biomarkers predict long-term endoscopic outcomes in Crohn’s disease under infliximab therapy

BACKGROUND

Infliximab trough level (ITL) severely affects therapeutic outcomes of Crohn’s disease (CD) patients under infliximab (IFX). Recently, frontier research has focused on identifying ITL based on different therapeutic targets. Although previous studies have elaborated clinical value of ITL monitoring on short-term outcomes in CD patients during therapy, studies contraposing the predictive value of ITL on long-term endoscopic outcomes in CD patients are still scarce domestically and overseas.

AIM

To explore the predictive value of ITL in combination with inflammatory biomarkers on long-term endoscopic outcomes in CD with clinical remission during IFX maintenance therapy.

METHODS

CD patients with endoscopic remission under long-term IFX maintenance therapy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University from January 2012 to December 2020 were collected. ITL and inflammatory biomarkers were continuously monitored during the therapy. The Step I study was conducted from weeks 14 to 54 of IFX treatment. The Step II study was conducted from weeks 54 to 108 of IFX treatment. Endoscopic outcomes were defined as endoscopic activity (Crohn’s disease endoscopic index of severity score > 2 points or Rutgeerts score > i1) and endoscopic remission (Crohn’s disease endoscopic index of severity score ≤ 2 points or Rutgeerts ≤ i1). Endoscopic relapse free survival was defined as endoscopic remission at the beginning of the study stage and maintaining endoscopic remission during the study stage.

RESULTS

At week 14, low ITL [odds ratio (OR) = 0.666, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.514-0.862, P < 0.01] and high fecal calprotectin (FCP) level (OR = 1.002, 95%CI: 1.001-1.004, P < 0.01) increased the risk of endoscopic activity at week 54. At week 54, low ITL (OR = 0.466, 95%CI: 0.247-0.877, P < 0.01) and high C-reactive protein (CRP) level (OR = 1.590, 95%CI: 1.007-2.510, P < 0.01) increased the risk of endoscopic activity at week 108. At week 14, ITL ≤ 5.60 μg/mL [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.83, 95%CI: 0.73-0.90, P < 0.001] and FCP > 238 μg/g (AUC = 0.82, 95%CI: 0.72-0.89, P < 0.001) moderately predicted endoscopic activity at week 54. ITL ≤ 5.60 μg/mL in combination with FCP > 238 μg/g indicated 82.0% possibility of endoscopic activity. At week 54, ITL ≤ 2.10 μg/mL (AUC = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.72-0.93, P < 0.001) and CRP > 3.00 mg/L (AUC = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.60-0.84, P = 0.012) moderately predicted moderate endoscopic activity at week 108. ITL ≤ 2.10 μg/mL in combination with CRP > 3.00 mg/L indicated 100.0% possibility of endoscopic activity. From weeks 14 to 54 of IFX treatment, patients with ITL > 5.60 μg/mL had higher rate of endoscopic relapse free survival than those with ITL ≤ 5.60 μg/mL (95.83% vs 46.67%). From weeks 54 to 108 of IFX treatment, patients with ITL > 2.10 μg/mL had higher rate of endoscopic survival free relapsed rate than those with ITL ≤ 2.10 μg/mL (92.68% vs 30.77%).

CONCLUSION

Combination of ITL, CRP, and FCP contribute to long-term endoscopic prognosis monitoring. During IFX maintenance treatment, low ITL, high CRP level, and high FCP level were independent risk factors of CD patients with clinical remission in adverse endoscopy outcomes within 1-year follow-up.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biologics in Crohn's Disease

Reactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is considered the standard of care for optimizing biologics in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) including Crohn's disease (CD). Preliminary data show that proactive TDM is associated with positive outcomes in IBD and can be also used to efficiently guide therapeutic decisions in specific clinical scenarios. Higher biological drug concentrations are associated with favorable therapeutic outcomes in specific IBD populations or phenotypes including pediatric CD, perianal fistulizing CD, small bowel CD, and following an ileocolonic resection for CD. Future perspectives of TDM include the use of rapid testing, pharmacogenomics, and pharmacokinetic dashboards toward individualized therapy.

Impact of a pharmacist led thiopurine monitoring service in outpatients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Thiopurines are effective therapies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), however treatment comes with safety concerns and adverse effects. Knowledge of the impact of pharmacists performing thiopurine monitoring is limited.

AIMS

To determine the impact of a pharmacist led monitoring service in patients with IBD commencing thiopurine therapy managed in the ambulatory care setting.

METHODS

Patients commencing thiopurine therapy for IBD pre and post introduction of a pharmacist led monitoring intervention were assessed. Pre-intervention patients received standard of care, while the post-intervention cohort were managed by the pharmacist. Data was acquired via retrospective audit of hospital medical records. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with documented review for thiopurine adverse effects within the initial three weeks. Secondary endpoints included achievement of therapeutic drug levels, persistence with thiopurine therapy, IBD related episodes of care and number of outpatient medical reviews.

RESULTS

Pre and post intervention cohorts comprised of 37 and 33 patients respectively. Pharmacist intervention increased the proportion of patients with documented monitoring within three weeks from 8.1% to 84.8% (p <0.01). No difference in thiopurine dose optimisation was seen (27% vs 27.3%). Persistence with thiopurine therapy increased from 65.7 to 87.9% (p <0.03) at six months. IBD related emergency department presentations were not significantly decreased (8.1% vs 3%, p=0.62). No significant change was observed in hospital admissions (16.2% vs 12.1%, p=0.74) or outpatient medical reviews.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacist monitoring of thiopurine therapy initiation in IBD outpatients improves adverse effect monitoring and increases medication persistence. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Impact of Infliximab-dyyb (Infliximab Biosimilar) on Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes: 1-Year Follow-up Results from an Observational Real-World Study Among Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the US and Canada (the ONWARD Study)

Introduction

To date, there are limited real-world studies published on the use of infliximab-dyyb, a biosimilar to reference product (RP) infliximab approved for the treatment of moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) in North America. This study examined utilization patterns and the effects of infliximab-dyyb on clinical outcomes, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and healthcare resource use (HCRU) in IBD patients in a real-world setting.

Methods

In this prospective, observational study, adult IBD patients in the US and Canada were recruited to initiate treatment with infliximab-dyyb and followed for 12 months. Patients included biologic-naïve users of infliximab-dyyb and patients switching from RP infliximab or other biologics to infliximab-dyyb. Partial Mayo (pMAYO) and Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) scores measured clinical outcomes for the UC and CD cohorts, respectively. Key PRO measures included the SIBDQ, EQ-VAS, and psychological outcomes. In addition, work productivity, HCRU, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed.

Results

A total of 67 CD and 48 UC patients were enrolled (51% female; mean age 44 years; 87% Caucasian; mean BMI 27.9). Thirty-nine patients were biologic-naïve, 57 switched from RP infliximab, and 19 switched from other biologics. Among UC biologic-naïve users, pMAYO decreased from 5.67 to 1.09 (p < 0.0001) and the remission rate increased from 5.6 to 90.9% (p = 0.0015). For UC patients switching from RP infliximab, pMAYO decreased from 1.38 to 0.29 (p = 0.0103). For CD biologic-naïve users, HBI scores and remission rates did not significantly change. The scores on all the PROs significantly improved from baseline to 12 months. A total of 22 AEs occurred consistent with the known AE profile for infliximab.

Conclusions

Clinical outcomes among biologic-naïve users of infliximab-dyyb improved for UC and were maintained for CD patients. Biologic-naïve users of infliximab-dyyb showed significant improvements in PROs. Patients switching from RP infliximab to infliximab-dyyb maintained their clinical outcomes and PROs.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Number: NCT03801928 (February 23, 2018).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-022-02104-6.

Evidence-based efficacy of methotrexate in adult Crohn's disease in different intestinal and extraintestinal indications

INTRODUCTION

Methotrexate (MTX) is included in the therapeutic armamentarium of Crohn's disease (CD), although its positioning is currently uncertain in an era in which many effective biological drugs are available. No systematic reviews or meta-analysis have stratified the clinical outcomes of MTX according to the specific clinical scenarios of its use.

METHODS

Medline, PubMed and Scopus were used to extract eligible studies, from database inception to May 2021. A total of 163 studies were included. A systematic review was performed by stratifying the outcomes of MTX according to formulation, clinical indication and criteria of efficacy.

RESULTS

The use of MTX is supported by randomized clinical trials only in steroid-dependent CD, with similar outcomes to thiopurines. The use of MTX in patients with steroid-refractoriness, failure of thiopurines or in combination with biologics is not supported by high levels of evidence. Combination therapy with biologics can optimize the immunogenic profile of the biological drug, but the impact on long-term clinical outcomes is described only in small series with anti-TNFα. Other off-label uses, such as fistulizing disease, mucosal healing, postoperative prevention and extraintestinal manifestations, are described in small uncontrolled series. The best performance in most indications was shown by parenteral MTX, favouring higher doses (25 mg/week) in the induction phase.

DISCUSSION

Evidence from high-quality studies in favour of MTX is scarce and limited to the steroid-dependent disease, in which other drugs are the leading players today. Many limitations on study design have been found, such as the prevalence of retrospective underpowered studies and the lack of stratification of outcomes according to specific types of patients and formulations of MTX.

CONCLUSION

MTX is a valid option as steroid-sparing agent in steroid-dependent CD. Numerous other clinical scenarios require well-designed clinical studies in terms of patient profile, drug formulation and dosage, and criteria of efficacy.

The Impact of Intermediate Antidrug Antibodies to Infliximab and Adalimumab on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Crohn’s Disease or Ulcerative Colitis

Background: The anti-TNF drugs adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX) are effective treatments for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, 40% of patients lose response, often due to the development of antibodies-to-ADA (ATA) and antibodies-to-IFX (ATI). While low ATA/ATI titres (<200 ng/mL) are associated with better outcomes and high ATA/ATI titres (>1,000 ng/mL) are associated with poorer outcomes, the significance of intermediate ATA/ATI titres (200–999 ng/mL) is not well understood. This study aims to investigate the impact of intermediate ATA/ATI titres on outcomes in patients with IBD. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 376 patients with IBD was conducted. The primary clinical outcome was persistence on anti-TNF therapy for 1 year after the measurement of ATA/ATI titres. The participants consisted of patients with IBD treated with IFX or ADA at the University of Maryland Medical Center’s Inflammatory Bowel Disease Program between October 2016 and October 2019. Results: Out of 322 patients with low titres, 271 persisted on their original anti-TNF, compared with nine out the 15 patients with intermediate titres (p=0.026) and one out the 10 patients with high titres (p<0.0001). The odds ratio of persistence when comparing intermediate titres to low titres was 0.26 (0.09–0.80), and when comparing high titres to low titres was 0.02 (0.00–0.14). Conclusion: Patients with intermediate titres were more likely to lose response to anti-TNF drugs and require a change in anti-TNF therapy than patients with low titres. Although the sample size of patients with intermediate titres was small, providers should consider dose optimisation of anti-TNF drugs, with or without the addition of an immunosuppressant, when intermediate titres are present.

Indicators of suboptimal response to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in patients from China with inflammatory bowel disease: results from the EXPLORE study

Background

Prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing in China. The EXPLORE study evaluated the incidence and indicators of suboptimal responses to first-line anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn’s disease (CD). We present results for the mainland China subgroup.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed in adults with IBD at 10 centers in mainland China who initiated anti-TNF therapy between 01 March 2010 and 01 March 2015. The cumulative incidence of suboptimal response to first-line anti-TNF therapy was assessed over 24 months using the Kaplan–Meier method. Indicators of suboptimal response were: dose escalation, discontinuation, augmentation with non-biologic therapy, or IBD-related surgery/hospitalization. At site initiation, a survey was conducted with participating physicians to identify barriers to anti-TNF use.

Results

Of 287 patients (72% male) examined, 16/35 (45.7%) with UC and 123/252 (48.8%) with CD experienced a suboptimal response to first-line anti-TNF therapy at any point during the observation period (median 27.6 and 40.0 months, respectively). At 1 and 2 years post anti-TNF initiation, the cumulative incidence of suboptimal response was 51.4% and 75.7% for UC and 45.4% and 57.0% for CD, respectively. Median time to first suboptimal response was 7.2 months for UC and 14.3 months for CD. The most frequent indicator of suboptimal response was discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy (9/16, 56.3%) for UC and IBD-related hospitalization for CD (69/123, 56.1%) followed by augmentation with non-biologic therapy for both cohorts (5/16, 31.3% for UC and 28/123, 22.8% for CD). Dose escalation was the least frequent indicator of suboptimal response to anti-TNF therapy (CD: 4/123, 3.3%; UC: not cited as an indicator). The cumulative incidence of suboptimal response within 4 months of first-line anti-TNF therapy (primary non-response) was over 30% in both cohorts. Financial reasons and reimbursement were identified by surveyed physicians as the most common barriers to prescribing an anti-TNF therapy.

Conclusions

Over one-half of patients with IBD are at risk of experiencing a suboptimal response to first-line anti-TNF therapy at 2 years post-initiation in China. This study highlights a substantial unmet need associated with anti-TNF therapies in China. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03090139).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-021-02074-z.

Articular manifestations in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases treated with anti-TNF

Objective

To describe and identify factors associated with articular manifestations occurring in patients treated with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs).

Methods

Retrospective monocentric study, including all patients who received an anti-TNF for an IBD in our hospital. All incident articular manifestations occurring during treatment were analysed. Characteristics of patients with paradoxical articular manifestations were compared with that of patients without inflammatory articular manifestations.

Results

Between February 2013 and May 2017, we identified 442 patients (36.2±15 years, 50.5% men) who had ever received an anti-TNF for an IBD: Crohn’s disease (n=277), ulcerative colitis (n=154) and undetermined colitis (n=11). 115 (26%) patients developed new articular manifestations after a mean of 20 (±22) months of treatment. Among them, 59 (13.3%) had inflammatory manifestations: paradoxical in 39%, concomitant of an IBD flare in 27%, linked to an immunisation against anti-TNF in 27% and 7% to another diagnosis. Among paradoxical articular manifestations, 19 (83%) were new articular symptoms, including 8 (35%) de novo spondyloarthritis. There were no predictive factors of paradoxical articular manifestation. Paradoxical manifestations spontaneously resolved in 16 (70%) patients despite continuation of anti-TNF.

Conclusion

Inflammatory articular manifestations occurred in about 13% of patients treated with anti-TNF for IBD. More than a quarter were linked to an immunisation against anti-TNF, which has to be searched in this situation. About 40% were paradoxical. In most of cases, they were transitory and did not require anti-TNFs discontinuation.

Discontinuation of Azathioprine could be considered in pediatric patients with Crohn's disease who have sustained clinical and deep remission

Few studies have demonstrated treatment strategies about the duration and cessation of medications in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). We investigated factors affecting clinical relapse after infliximab (IFX) or azathioprine (AZA) withdrawal in pediatric patients with CD on combination therapy. Pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe CD receiving combination therapy were analyzed retrospectively and factors associated with clinical relapse were investigated. Discontinuation of IFX or AZA was performed in patients who sustained clinical remission (CR) for at least two years and achieved deep remission. A total of 75 patients were included. Forty-four patients (58.7%) continued with combination therapy and 31 patients (41.3%) discontinued AZA or IFX (AZA withdrawal 10, IFX withdrawal 15, both withdrawal 6). Cox proportional-hazards regression and statistical internal validation identified three factors associated with clinical relapse: IFX cessation (hazard ratio; HR 2.982, P = 0.0081), IFX TLs during maintenance therapy (HR 0.581, P = 0.003), 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) level (HR 0.978, P < 0.001). However, AZA cessation was not associated with clinical relapse (P = 0.9021). Even when applied in pediatric patients who met stringent criteria, IFX cessation increased the relapse risk. However, withdrawal of AZA could be contemplated in pediatric patients with CD who have sustained CR for at least 2 years and achieved deep remission.

Comparison of Timing to Develop Anti-Drug Antibodies to Infliximab and Adalimumab Between Adult and Pediatric Age Groups, Males and Females

OBJECTIVE

To compare the timing of serum anti-drug antibodies in adult and pediatric age groups, males and females, treated for inflammatory bowel disease or arthritis with adalimumab or infliximab by retrospectively combining data collected during a 2-year therapeutic drug monitoring period.

METHODS

Four hundred thirty sera were divided in groups collected at 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months (T0, T3, T6, T12, and T24) after initiation of therapy and assayed for drug and relative anti-drug antibodies levels. At each time point, the percentage of sera presenting anti-drug antibodies, as well as the drug concentrations, were calculated and correlated with patient age and sex.

RESULTS

Anti-drug antibodies were present in 31.5% of sera and were significantly higher in the pediatric age group than in the adult age group, through all time points. The percentages of sera showing anti-drug antibodies were significantly different as early as 3 months and were sera from pediatric female group. The percentages of sera showing anti-drug antibodies reached the highest value at 6 months in the pediatric age group and at 12 months in the adult age group.

CONCLUSIONS

Sera from pediatric had an earlier presence of anti-drug antibodies than adults. In particular, pediatric females sera showed the fastest anti-drug antibodies development.

The efficacy of immunomodulators in the prevention and suppression of anti-drug antibodies to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

The development of biological agents against tumor necrosis factor (TNF) has revolutionized the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), frequently achieving induction and maintenance of remission in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. However, a loss of response due to the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) is seen annually in approximately 20% of IBD patients receiving anti-TNF therapy. Current evidence suggests that the use of immunomodulators (IMM), such as thiopurines (azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine) or methotrexate, may prevent or suppress ADA formation. In this article, we present a comprehensive review of the available literature regarding the efficacy of IMM in the prevention and suppression of ADA development to anti-TNF therapy in patients with IBD.

SLCO1B1 *15 allele is associated with methotrexate-induced nausea in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Low-dose methotrexate (MTX) is an immunosuppressant used to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). SLCO1B1 genetic variation has been associated with delayed MTX clearance and increased toxicity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between SLCO1B1 genetic variation and MTX-induced nausea in children with IBD. We performed a single center retrospective chart analysis of 278 patients who were prescribed MTX for IBD. Two hundred two patients had banked DNA and were genotyped for three SLCO1B1 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs; rs4149056, rs2306283, and rs11045819). Diplotypes were determined by combining the SNPs into *1, *4, *5, *14, *15, and *37 alleles. Incidence of nausea was abstracted from clinician notes. Prescriptions and demographics were extracted from the medical record. The cohort was 69.8% boys, 89.1% White, and 87.6% had a diagnosis of Crohn's disease with a mean age of 16.0 (± 3.8) years. MTX-induced nausea was noted in 34% of the cohort. MTX-induced nausea was associated with the number of reduced-function *15 alleles (p = 0.034) and occurred 2.26 times more often in patients with at least one *15 allele who did not initiate MTX treatment with concomitant ondansetron (p = 0.034). MTX-induced nausea was significantly independently associated with SLCO1B1 diplotype (p = 0.006) after controlling for MTX dose group and concomitant ondansetron. Our data demonstrate that the SLCO1B1 *15 allele is associated with MTX-induced nausea in pediatric patients with IBD. Additionally, *15 allele carriers could benefit from a dose reduction of MTX to reduce exposure and treatment initiation with concomitant ondansetron to reduce nausea.

Intermittent Appearance of Antibodies to Infliximab Is Not Associated With Reduced Efficacy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

GOALS

To assess the clinical significance of antibodies to infliximab (ATI) formation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

BACKGROUND

Infliximab therapy in patients with IBD is highly effective though up to 50% of patients lose response to infliximab. ATI formation occurs in 6% to 60% of patients on scheduled infliximab maintenance therapy.

METHODS

Infliximab trough levels and ATI at trough were prospectively determined in patients with IBD on maintenance infliximab therapy. Patients on infliximab maintenance therapy with at least 3 ATI measurements were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups: sustained negative (<1 µg/mL) ATI levels, and fluctuating ATI levels (at least 1 sample with ATI <1 and at least one >1 µg/mL).

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients with IBD with available clinical data and serum samples were included. 25 patients had sustained low ATI levels and 23 patients had fluctuating ATI levels. Both groups were similar in IBD subtype distribution (Crohn's disease in 73.9% and 60%), mean serum albumin levels (4.2 vs. 3.9 g/dL), and mean trough serum infliximab levels (3.3 vs. 4.6 µg/mL) in fluctuating ATI and low ATI groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in the rate of clinical response (64% vs. 76%) and mean serum C-reactive protein levels (9.4 vs. 8.5 mg/dL, ULN=5) in the fluctuating ATI and low ATI groups. Similar rates of clinical response in the fluctuating ATI and low ATI groups were observed in ulcerative colitis (33% vs. 40%) and Crohn's disease (76% vs. 100%).

CONCLUSIONS

The fluctuating pattern of appearance of ATI in patients with IBD was not associated with loss of clinical response or a rise in C-reactive protein. The authors suggest that in clinical decision making, only sustained appearance of ATI should be considered as an adverse therapeutic factor.

The Effectiveness of Methylprednisolone as a Premedication Among the Pediatric Population for Preventing Infusion-Related Reactions to Infliximab

Administering medications prior to infliximab infusions to prevent infusion-related infliximab reactions is a common practice in the United States. However, the premedication protocol varies among different institutions. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate whether the use of methylprednisolone was effective as a premedication to prevent infusion reactions while infliximab was administered to children with inflammatory bowel disease. The effect of concurrent use of other immunomodulators on the rate of reaction incidents was also studied. This was a retrospective chart review, assessing children younger than 21 years diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease from January 2008 to April 2018. The incident rate of infusion reactions was also compared between two cohorts: those who received the premedication of methylprednisolone and those who did not. Subgroup analysis of concomitant immunomodulators, infliximab dose and frequency, and anti-infliximab assay were also performed. A total of 34 subjects received methylprednisolone as a premedication and 151 subjects did not. No statistically significant difference of allergic reactions was found between the two groups (p = .727). Concomitant immunomodulator therapy lowered the likelihood of developing reactions (p = .048). This study was conducted to help pediatric gastroenterology and infusion nurses better understand and implement evidence-based approaches in the premedication protocol for infusions of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNF-α) antibody products.

Anti-Drug Antibody Formation Against Biologic Agents in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Immunogenicity with formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to biologics is an important reason for treatment failure in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Our aim was to assess the rate of ADA, the effect of combination therapy with immunomodulators on ADA and the influence of ADA on efficacy and safety of biologics for IBD treatment.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched from inception to April 2020 for trials of biologics that assessed immunogenicity. The overall certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE). The primary outcome was rate of ADA. Secondary outcomes included efficacy and safety outcomes among patients with detectable versus undetectable ADA. For dichotomous outcomes, pooled risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

Data from 68 studies were analyzed and 33 studies (5850 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled ADA rates for biologic monotherapy were 28.0% for infliximab, 7.5% for adalimumab, 3.8% for golimumab, 10.9% for certolizumab, 6.2% for ustekinumab and 16.0% for natalizumab. Pooled ADA rates were 8.4% for vedolizumab and 5.0% for etrolizumab for combo- and monotherapy combined. In all biologics, ADA rates were underestimated by use of drug-sensitive ADA assays and higher dose and/or frequency. ADA rate was significantly reduced in patients treated with combination therapy for infliximab (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.44-0.62), adalimumab (RR 0.31; 95% CI 0.14-0.69), golimumab (RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.10-0.83), certolizumab pegol (RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.14-0.67) and natalizumab (RR 0.20; 95% CI 0.11-0. 39). ADA to infliximab were associated with lower clinical response rates (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.61-0.91) and higher rates of infusion reactions (RR 2.36; 95% CI 1.85-3.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in analytical methods to detect ADA hamper comparison of true ADA rates across biologics in IBD. Use of combination therapy with immunomodulators appeared to reduce ADA positivity for most biologics. For infliximab, ADA were associated with reduced drug efficacy and increased adverse events.

Adalimumab for CNS sarcoidosis: single-center experience and literature review

BACKGROUND

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha is critical in the development of granulomas and multiple recent reports have highlighted the role of infliximab, an infused TNF alpha inhibitor, in the treatment of neurosarcoidosis. As a self-injected TNF alpha inhibitor, adalimumab has certain advantages over infused medications, including greater patient freedom and autonomy. Experience with adalimumab is not well reported in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

To report clinical experience with adalimumab in the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) sarcoidosis by combining observations in our center with those that have been reported in the literature.

METHODS

Patients were identified from the Mass General Brigham Research Patient Data Registry and in the literature by searching PubMed. Patients with CNS manifestations of sarcoidosis treated with adalimumab were included for retrospective review and analyzed for baseline characteristics, treatment indications, outcomes, and adverse effects.

RESULTS

Adalimumab was commonly started after failure of or intolerance to infliximab and methotrexate. Of those with adequate follow-up, 5/10 ultimately improved, remission was maintained in 3/10, and 2/10 with active disease remained stable without further worsening. One patient suffered a relapse, likely multifactorial in etiology, but has remained relapse free on adalimumab for 10 months subsequently. Three patients ultimately discontinued adalimumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary evidence suggests that adalimumab may be a reasonable therapeutic option for patients with neurosarcoidosis affecting the CNS, including those with medically refractory disease.

Biologic monotherapy versus combination therapy with immunomodulators in the induction and maintenance of remission of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis

Despite current guidelines, the optimal treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains challenging. The available medications are not without risk and there is not a single correct treatment regimen for every patient. Personalizing treatment and selecting the most appropriate therapy is crucial for optimal response, remission, quality of life, and healthcare utilization. Biologics, especially anti-tumor necrosis factor-α medications, are widely used in the induction and maintenance of disease remission in patients with IBD. Similarly, immunomodulators, including thiopurines and methotrexate, are traditionally popular for the maintenance of remission. In this manuscript, we review the use of biologic monotherapy vs. combination therapy with immunomodulators for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. We examine overall remission, immunogenicity and adverse effects, mainly serious infections and malignancy, in an effort to help guide treatment decisions and weigh the risks and benefits of biologic monotherapy vs. combination therapy.

Refractory Pediatric Psoriasis and Atopic Dermatitis: The Importance of Therapeutical Adherence and Biological Management

The rates of refractory pediatric psoriasis and atopic dermatitis (AD) have steadily risen over the last few decades, demanding newer and more effective therapies. This review aims to explore the reasons for resistant disease, as well as its management; this includes the indications for, efficacy of, and safety of current therapies for refractory pediatric dermatologic disease. A PubMed search for key phrases was performed. Poor medication adherence is the most common cause of resistant disease and may be managed with techniques such as simplified treatment regimens, more follow-ups and educational workshops, as well as framing and tailoring. Once problems with adherence are ruled out, escalating treatment to stronger biologic therapy may be indicated. Development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) can cause patients’ disease to be refractory in the presence of potent biologics, which may be addressed with regular medication use or concomitant methotrexate. If patients with AD fail to respond to biologic therapy, a biopsy to rule out mycosis fungoides, or patch testing to rule out allergic contact dermatitis, may be indicated. A limitation of this study is the absence of more techniques for the management of poor medication adherence. Managing medication adherence, escalating treatment when appropriate, and addressing possible anti-drug antibodies will help assure control and relief for patients with resistant disease.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists in Crohn Disease: A Theoretical Construct to Apply Pharmacokinetics and Guidelines to Clinical Practice

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is the measurement of drug and antidrug antibody concentrations in individuals to guide treatment decisions. In patients with Crohn disease (CD), TDM, used either reactively or proactively, is emerging as a valuable tool for optimization of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist therapy. Reactive TDM is carried out in response to treatment failure, whereas proactive TDM involves the periodic monitoring of patients responding to TNF antagonist therapy to allow treatment optimization. In patients with CD, most of the available data for TDM relate to the first-to-market TNF antagonist infliximab and, to a lesser extent, to adalimumab and certolizumab pegol. Several gastroenterology associations, including the American Gastroenterology Association, have endorsed the use of reactive TDM in patients with active CD. However, fewer recommendations currently exist for the use of proactive TDM, although several new prospective randomized controlled trials evaluating proactive TDM strategies have been published. In this review, the current evidence for reactive and proactive TDM is discussed, and a proactive treatment algorithm for certolizumab pegol based on previously published threshold concentrations is proposed.

Factors Associated with the Immunogenicity of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Agents in Pediatric Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background/Aims

Anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) can develop during treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents. We aimed to investigate the factors associated with immunogenicity of anti-TNF agents in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and observe the clinical course of ADA-positive patients.

Methods

Pediatric IBD patients receiving maintenance treatment with anti-TNF agents who had been tested for ADAs against infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADL) were included in this cross-sectional study. Factors associated with ADA positivity were investigated by analyzing clinicodemographic, laboratory, and treatment-related factors.

Results

A total of 76 patients (Crohn’s disease, 65; ulcerative colitis, 11) were included. Among these, 59 and 17 patients were receiving IFX and ADL, respectively. ADAs were found in 10 patients (13.2%), all of whom were receiving IFX. According to multivariable logistic regression analysis, the IFX trough level (TL) was associated with ADA positivity (odds ratio, 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08 to 0.51; p=0.002). According to the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the optimal cutoff of the IFX TLs for stratifying patients based on the presence of ADAs against IFX was 1.88 μg/mL (area under curve, 0.941; 95% CI, 0.873 to 1.000; sensitivity, 80.0%; specificity, 95.9%; p<0.001). Among the 10 patients with ADAs against IFX, five patients (50%) switched to ADL within 1 year, while five patients (50%) kept receiving IFX. Transient ADAs were observed in three patients (30%).

Conclusions

IFX TL was the only factor associated with ADA formation in pediatric IBD patients receiving IFX. Future studies based on serial and proactive therapeutic drug monitoring are required in the future.

Real-World Experience With Proactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring During Infliximab Reintroduction

Background

Interruptions in infliximab therapy are associated with the development of antibodies to infliximab (ATI), infusion reactions (IRs), and loss of response. Despite these challenges, recent observational studies suggest that reinitiating infliximab after a drug holiday can be safe and effective. We assessed the utility of our protocol for restarting infliximab using early serum infliximab and ATI measurements.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of patients restarted on infliximab after at least a 6-month drug holiday. The cohort was divided into 2 groups: a "therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) group," those who had serum infliximab and ATI measured 1-3 weeks after first reinduction dose, and a "non-TDM group." Outcomes included results of TDM, occurrence of immediate IR (IIR) and delayed hypersensitivity reactions, and medication persistence at 14 weeks and 1 year.

Results

About 76 patients were included: 49 in the TDM group and 27 in the non-TDM group. Of 76, 67 (88%) patients tolerated the first reinduction dose without IR. Formation of ATI was seen in 17 of 49 (35%) patients and was associated with longer drug holidays. Most did not experience IR during the entire therapy course-in 26 of 32 (81%) without ATI and 20 of 27 (74%) in the non-TDM group. Infliximab persistence at 14 weeks and 1 year was 76% and 57% for the cohort, respectively.

Conclusion

Infliximab can be safely and effectively restarted after a drug holiday. We suggest performing TDM with a drug-tolerant assay 1-3 weeks after the first reinduction infusion as a means to identify patients at risk for severe IIR at the second dose.

Combination Therapy Does Not Improve Rate of Clinical or Endoscopic Remission in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Treated With Vedolizumab or Ustekinumab

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) often receive combination therapy with an immunomodulator and tumor necrosis factor antagonists, especially infliximab. However, the benefits of combination therapy with vedolizumab and ustekinumab are unclear.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of patients with CD or UC initiating vedolizumab or ustekinumab therapy at Massachusetts General Hospital (USA), Alberta Health Sciences (Canada), or Nancy University Hospital (France) with at least 1 year of follow up. The primary outcome was clinical remission or response at week 14, based on the Harvey Bradshaw index for CD or simple clinical colitis index or partial Mayo score for UC. We separately examined week 30 and week 54 clinical outcomes, endoscopic response, and durability of therapy using multivariable regression models and adjusting for relevant confounders.

RESULTS

Our study included 549 patients (263 with UC, 286 with CD) receiving maintenance therapy with vedolizumab and 363 patients (4 with UC, 359 with CD) receiving maintenance therapy with ustekinumab with 1 year of follow up. The mean disease duration was 13-15 years. One-hundred thirty-one patients receiving vedolizumab (23.9%; 78 receiving thiopurine, 53 receiving methotrexate) and 120 patients receiving ustekinumab (33.1%, 57 receiving thiopurine, 63 receiving methotrexate) were receiving combination therapy. For vedolizumab, there was no difference in clinical response or remission with combination therapy vs monotherapy at week 14 (68.2% vs 74.1%; P = .22), week 30 (74.3% vs 75.6%; P = .78) or week 54 (78.3% vs 72.9%, P = .33). For ustekinumab, there was no difference in clinical response or remission with combination therapy vs monotherapy at week 14 (54.6% vs 65.8%; P = .08), week 30 (71.6% vs 77.4%; P = .33) or week 54 (62.1% vs 67.0%; P = .52). There were similar proportions of patients remaining on treatment or with endoscopic response at 1 year among patients receiving combination or monotherapy with vedolizumab or ustekinumab.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CD or UC initiating ustekinumab or vedolizumab therapy, combination therapy with immunomodulators did not increase rates of clinical remission or response, endoscopic remission, or persistence of therapy at 1 year.

Safety of Rapid Infliximab Biosimilar Infusions in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

The biosimilar landscape for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) continues to grow, with several biosimilar products for originator infliximab now available. The rapid infusion of originator infliximab and infliximab-dyyb has been shown to be well tolerated; however, the tolerability of rapid infusion in patients receiving infliximab-abda, another infliximab biosimilar, or in those who have switched among originator infliximab and biosimilars remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the safety of rapid infusion in patients with IBD who received infliximab-abda or underwent switches with infliximab products.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study of all infliximab-related infusion encounters for patients ≥18 years with IBD who received their infusion over 30 to 90 minutes at our institution between March 1, 2020, and September 30, 2020. Patient, disease, and treatment characteristics were collected. The primary outcome was infusion reactions.

RESULTS

A total of 377 infusion encounters for 96 unique patients were evaluated. Within the study cohort, 16% of patients were treated with originator infliximab, 42% with infliximab-dyyb, and 2% with infliximab-abda. The remaining 41% of patients received at least 2 infliximab products during the study period, primarily infliximab-dyyb and infliximab-abda. Approximately 54% and 42% of infusions encounters included premedication and immunomodulator use. Within the 377 infusion encounters, no infusion reactions were noted.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Rapid infusion of infliximab biosimilars (including infliximab-abda) and in patients who have switched among originator infliximab and biosimilars is well tolerated. Future studies should assess clinical impact and outcomes of rapid infusion with biosimilars.