Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio in node positive colon cancer

Prognostic and predictive value of tumor infiltration proportion within lymph nodes in N1 colorectal cancer

Introduction

Lymph node metastasis is a crucial determinant of prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC), significantly impacting survival outcomes and treatment decision-making. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of tumor infiltration proportion within lymph nodes (TIPLN) in N1 CRC patients and to develop a TIPLN-based nomogram to predict prognosis.

Methods

A total of 416 N1 CRC patients who underwent radical resection were enrolled and divided into training and validation cohorts. Whole-slide images of lymph nodes were annotated to assess the TIPLN. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify independent prognostic factors and to develop a nomogram for predicting patient outcomes. The precision and discrimination of the nomogram were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), concordance index (C-index), and calibration curve. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to compare the net benefit of the nomogram at different threshold probabilities. Additionally, net reclassification index (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to evaluate the nomogram's clinical utility.

Results

High TIPLN levels were significantly associated with poorer overall survival (OS). Five variables, including TIPLN, were selected to construct the nomogram. The C-index in OS prediction was 0.739 and 0.753 for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Additionally, strong precision and discrimination were demonstrated through AUC and calibration curves. The NRI (training cohort: 0.191 for 3-year and 0.436 for 5-year OS prediction; validation cohort: 0.180 for 3-year and 0.439 for 5-year OS prediction) and IDI (training cohort: 0.079 for 3-year and 0.094 for 5-year OS prediction; validation cohort: 0.078 for 3-year and 0.098 for 5-year OS prediction) suggest that the TIPLN-based nomogram significantly outperformed the clinicopathological nomogram. Furthermore, DCA demonstrated the high clinical applicability of the TIPLN-based nomogram for predicting OS.

Conclusions

TIPLN could serve as a prognostic predictor for N1 CRC patients. The TIPLN-based nomogram enhances survival prediction accuracy and facilitates more informed, individualized clinical decision-making.

Long-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid cancer: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Though our previous study has demonstrated that the single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery (SILS + 1) is safe and feasible for sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer and has better short-term outcomes compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS), the long-term outcomes of SILS + 1 remains uncertain and are needed to evaluated by an RCT.

METHODS

Patients with clinical stage T1-4aN0-2M0 rectosigmoid cancer were enrolled. The participants were randomly assigned to either SILS + 1 (n = 99) or CLS (n = 99). The 3-year DFS, 5-year OS, and recurrence patterns were analyzed.

RESULTS

Between April 2014 and July 2016, 198 patients were randomly assigned to either the SILS + 1 group (n = 99) or CLS group (n = 99). The median follow-up in the SILS + 1 group was 64.0 months and in CLS group was 65.0 months. The 3-year DFS was 87.8% (95% CI, 81.6-94.8%) in SILS + 1 group and 86.9% (95% CI, 81.3-94.5%) in CLS group (hazard ratio: 1.09 (95% CI, 0.48-2.47; P = 0.84)). The 5-year OS was 86.7% (95% CI,79.6-93.8%) in the SILS + 1 group and 80.5% (95% CI,72.5-88.5%) in the CLS group (hazard ratio: 1.53 (95% CI, 0.74-3.18; P = 0.25)). There were no significant differences in the recurrence patterns between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no significant difference in 3-year DFS and 5-year OS of patients with sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer treated with SILS + 1 vs. CLS. SILS + 1 is noninferior to CLS when performed by expert surgeons.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02117557 (registered on 21/04/2014).

Development and validation of prognostic model based on extragastric lymph nodes metastasis and lymph node ratio in node-positive gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study based on a multicenter database

BACKGROUND

Regional lymph node metastasis (LNM) is a competent and the most intensive predictor for the prognostic evaluation of patients after curative surgery. This study is based on the databases of two large medical centers in North and South China. It aims to establish a prognostic model based on extragastric LNM (ELNM) and lymph node ratio (LNR) in node-positive gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

Clinical data of 874 GC patients with pathologically confirmed LNM in a large medical center in southern China, were included as the training cohort. In addition, the clinical data of 674 patients with pathologically confirmed LNM from a large medical center in northern China were used as the validation cohort.

RESULTS

In the training cohort, a modified N staging system (mNstage) based on ELNM and LNR was established; it has a significantly higher prognostic accuracy than the pN, LNR and ELNM staging system (Akaike Information Criterion, pN stage vs. LNR stage vs. ELNM stage vs. mN stage=5498.479 vs. 5537.815 vs. 5569.844 vs. 5492.123; Bayesian Information Criterion, pN stage vs. LNR stage vs. ELNM stage vs. mN stage=5512.799 vs. 5547.361 vs. 5574.617 vs. 5506.896; likelihood-ratio χ2 , pN stage vs. LNR stage vs. ELNM stage vs. mN stage=177.7 vs. 149.8 vs. 115.79 vs. 183.5). In the external validation, mNstage also has higher prognostic accuracy than the pN, LNR and ELNM staging system. Cox multivariate regression analysis showed that age, mNstage, pT stage, and perineural invasion were independent factors. A nomogram model was established according to the four factors (age, mNstage, pT stage, and perineural invasion). The nomogram model was greater than the traditional tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging in the training cohort [1-year area under the curve (AUC), American Joint Commission for Cancer (AJCC) 8th TNM vs. nomogram=0.692 vs. 0.746, 3-year AUC: AJCC 8th TNM vs. nomogram=0.684 vs. 0.758, 5-year AUC: AJCC 8th TNM vs. nomogram=0.725 vs. 0.762]. In the external validation, the nomogram also showed better prognostic value and greater prediction accuracy than the traditional TNM staging.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic model based on ELNM and LNR has good prognostic prediction in patients with node-positive GC.

Predictive Significance of Tumour Size in Patients Undergoing Curative Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objectives To evaluate the predictive significance of tumour size in patients undergoing curative surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods All patients undergoing curative surgery for colon or rectum cancer performed by a single colorectal surgeon between January 2013 and January 2020 were considered eligible for inclusion. Linear and binary logistic regression analyses were modelled to assess whether colonic or rectal tumour size could predict R0 resection, specimen length, number of harvested and positive lymph nodes, lymphocytic infiltration, venous invasion, and overall survival. Results A total of 192 patients were eligible for inclusion. In patients with colon cancer, tumour size was the independent predictor of the number of harvested lymph nodes (P<0.001), the number of positive lymph nodes (P=0.001), and lymphocytic infiltration (P=0.009). However, it did not predict R0 resection (P=0.563), specimen length (P=0.111), specimen length >120 mm (P=0.186), >12 harvested lymph nodes (P=0.145), venous invasion (P=0.103), and five-year overall survival (P=0.543). In patients with rectal cancer, tumour size was the independent predictor of the number of harvested lymph nodes (P<0.001) and the number of positive lymph nodes (P<0.001). However, it did not predict R0 resection (P=0.108), specimen length (P=0.774), specimen length >120 mm (P=0.405), >12 harvested lymph nodes (P= 0.069), lymphocytic infiltration (P=0.912), venous invasion (P= 0.105), and five-year overall survival (P=0.413). Conclusions The results of the current study suggest that tumour size on its own may not have a significant predictive value in oncological or survival outcomes in patients undergoing curative surgery for colon or rectum cancer.

A Population-Based Study to Evaluate the Associations of Nodal Stage, Lymph Node Ratio and Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes with Survival in Patients with Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the real-world prognostic significance of lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LOPLN) in patients with non-metastatic small bowel adenocarcinoma. Methods: Patients diagnosed with early-stage small bowel adenocarcinoma between January 2007 and December 2018 from a large Canadian province were identified. We calculated the LNR by dividing positive over total lymph nodes examined and the LOPLN as log ([positive lymph nodes + 0.5]/[negative lymph nodes + 0.5]). The LNR and LOPLN were categorized at cut-offs of 0.4 and −1.1, respectively. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were constructed for each nodal stage, LNR and LOPLN, adjusting for measured confounding factors. Harrell’s C-index and Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) were used to calculate the prognostic discriminatory abilities of the different models. Results: We identified 141 patients. The median age was 67 years and 54.6% were men. The 5-year overall survival rates for patients with stage I, II and III small bowel adenocarcinoma were 50.0%, 56.6% and 47.5%, respectively. The discriminatory ability was generally comparable for LOPLN, LNR and nodal stage in the prognostication of all patients. However, LOPLN had higher discriminatory ability among patients with at least one lymph node involvement (Harrell’s C-index, 0.75, 0.77 and 0.82, and AIC, 122.91, 119.68 and 110.69 for nodal stage, LNR and LOPLN, respectively). Conclusion: The LOPLN may provide better prognostic information when compared to LNR and nodal stage in specific patients.

Metastatic lymph node ratio as a better prognostic tool than the TNM system in colorectal cancer

Background: The minimum number of lymph nodes that should be evaluated in colon cancer to adequately categorize lymph node status is still controversial. The lymph node ratio (LNR) may be a better prognostic indicator. Materials & methods: We studied 1065 patients treated from 1 January 2000 to 31 August 2012. Results: Significant differences in survival were detected according to regional lymph nodes (pN) (p < 0.001) and LNR (p < 0.001). LRN and pN are independent prognostic factors. Spearman correlation analysis showed a significant correlation between the total number of dissected lymph nodes and pN (rs = 0.167; p < 0.001), but the total number of dissected lymph nodes is not significantly correlated with LNR (rs = -0.019; p = 0.550). Interpretation: In this study, LNR seems to demonstrate a superior prognostic value compared with the pN categories, in part due to its greater independence regarding the extent of lymphadenectomy.

Is there a relationship between length of resection and lymph-node ratio in colorectal cancer?

Background

The prognosis of colorectal cancer depends on the number of positive lymph nodes (LN+) and the total number of lymph nodes resected (rLN). This represents the lymph-node ratio (LNR). The aim of our study is to assess how the length of the resected specimen (RL) influences the prognostic values of the LNR.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of all the patients operated on for colorectal cancer from 2000 to 2015 at our institution. Pathology details were analysed. The total number of rLN, the number of LN+, and the LNR were calculated and measured against the RL. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve of patients with LN+ was calculated.

Results

Of the 670 patients included in our study, 337 were men (50.3%) and the mean age was 69.2 years. The correlation with prognosis of the LNR is greater than that of the LNR adjusted to RL (LNR/RL), both in subjects with positive nodes (n = 312) and in all cases (n = 670). The LNR presents a higher prognostic value than LNR/RL and RL in patients with LN+ except for metastatic recurrence, for which the predictive value appears slightly higher for LNR/RL. The statistical significance of the maximal divergence in Kaplan-Meier survival plots was demonstrated for the LNR (P = 0.043), not for LNR/RL (P = 0.373) and RL alone (P = 0.314).

Conclusion

An increase in RL causes an increase in the number of harvested lymph nodes without affecting the number of LN+, thus representing a confounding factor that could alter the prognostic value of the LNR. Prospective larger-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Selecting the number of categories of the lymph node ratio in cancer research: A bootstrap-based hypothesis test

The high impact of the lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor is widely established in colorectal cancer, and is being used as a categorized predictor variable in several studies. However, the cut-off points as well as the number of categories considered differ considerably in the literature. Motivated by the need to obtain the best categorization of the lymph node ratio as a predictor of mortality in colorectal cancer patients, we propose a method to select the best number of categories for a continuous variable in a logistic regression framework. Thus, to this end, we propose a bootstrap-based hypothesis test, together with a new estimation algorithm for the optimal location of the cut-off points called BackAddFor, which is an updated version of the previously proposed AddFor algorithm. The performance of the hypothesis test was evaluated by means of a simulation study, under different scenarios, yielding type I errors close to the nominal errors and good power values whenever a meaningful difference in terms of prediction ability existed. Finally, the methodology proposed was applied to the CCR-CARESS study where the lymph node ratio was included as a predictor of five-year mortality, resulting in the selection of three categories.

Utility of regional nodal irradiation in Japanese patients with breast cancer with 1-3 positive nodes after breast-conserving surgery and axillary lymph-node dissection

The utility of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) is being considered in cases of 1-3 axillary node metastases after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND). Therefore, we examined the necessity of RNI by examining the sites of recurrences in cases at our institution. We retrospectively analyzed 5,164 cases of primary breast cancer between January 2000 and December 2014 at the Aichi Cancer Centre, identifying local and distant recurrences in 152 patients with primary breast cancer treated with BCS and ALND and who had 1-3 positive axillary nodes. All patients received whole-breast irradiation (WBI) and adjuvant systemic therapy with either chemotherapy or anti-endocrine therapy with or without anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 therapy. The present study excluded patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, contralateral breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, T4 tumors or N2-3 nodes and distant metastasis. From the database of our institution, we identified 152 cases that met the defined criteria. The median follow-up period was 71 months (1-176). Isolated locoregional recurrences were found in three patients (2.0%) and were recurrent only in the breast. Only one patient had local lymph node recurrence with distant recurrence. The 10-year rates of isolated regional disease-free survival (DFS), DFS, and overall survival were 95.41, 89.50 and 96.75%, respectively, which was better compared with previous studies. We conclude that the addition of RNI to WBI is not necessary for Japanese patients who have 1-3 positive axillary nodes and ALND.

The Prognostic Impact of the Metastatic Lymph Nodes Ratio in Colorectal Cancer

Background: This study was designed to validate the prognostic significance of the ratio of positive to examined lymph nodes (LNR) in patients with colorectal cancer. Methods: 218,314 patients from the SEER database and 1,811 patients from the three independent multicenter were included in this study. The patients were divided into 5 groups on a basis of previous published LNR: LNR0, patients with no metastatic lymph nodes; LNR1, patients with the LNR between 0.1 and 0.17; LNR2, patients with the LNR between 0.18 and 0.41; LNR3, patients with the LNR between 0.42 and 0.69; LNR4, patients with the LNR >0.7. The 5-year OS and CSS rate were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and the survival difference was tested using log-rank test. Multivariate Cox analysis was used to further assess the influence of the LNR on patients' outcome. Results: The 5-year OS rate of patients within LNR0 to LNR4 group was 71.2, 55.8, 39.3, 22.6, and 14.6%, respectively (p < 0.001) in the SEER database. While the 5-year OS rate of those with LNR0 to LNR4 was 75.2, 66.1, 48.0, 34.0, and 17.7%, respectively (p < 0.001) in the international multicenter cohort. In the multivariate analysis, LNR was demonstrated to be a strong prognostic factor in patients with < 12 and ≥12 metastatic lymph nodes. Furthermore, the LNR had a similar impact on the patients' prognosis in colon cancer and rectal cancer. Conclusion: The LNR allowed better prognostic stratification than the positive node (pN) in patients with colorectal cancer and the cut-off values were well validated.

Lymph node ratio is inferior to pN-stage in predicting outcome in colon cancer patients with high numbers of analyzed lymph nodes

Background

The lymph node ratio (LNR), i.e. the number of positive lymph nodes (LN) divided by the total number of analyzed LN, has been described as a strong outcome predictor in node-positive colon cancer patients. However, most published analyses are constrained by relatively low numbers of analyzed LN. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of LNR in colon cancer patients with high numbers of analyzed LN.

Methods

One hundred sixty-six colon cancer patients underwent open colon resection. All node-positive patients were analyzed for this study. The number of analyzed LN, of positive LN, the disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) time were prospectively recorded. Patients were dichotomously allocated to a high or a low LNR-group, respectively, with the median LNR (0.125) as a cut-off value. Median follow-up was 34.3 months.

Results

Fifty-eight patients (34.9%) were node-positive. The median number of analyzed LN was 23 (range 8–54). DFS and OS were significantly shorter in pN2 vs pN1 patients (p < 0.001, and p = 0.001, respectively), and in LNR high vs low patients (p = 0.032, and p = 0.034, respectively). pN2 (vs pN1) disease showed hazard ratios (HR) of 6.2 (p < 0.001), and 6.8 (p < 0.005; for DFS and OS, respectively), while LNR high (vs low) showed HR of 3.0 (p =0.041), and 4.5 (p = 0.054).

Conclusions

LNR is a reasonable outcome predictor in node-positive colon cancer patients. However, LNR is inferior to pN-stage in predicting survival in patients with high number of harvested lymph nodes.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12893-018-0417-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Role of "Second Look" Lymph Node Search in Harvesting Optimal Number of Lymph Nodes for Staging of Colorectal Carcinoma

As with other malignancies, lymph node metastasis is an important staging element and prognostic factor in colorectal carcinomas. The number of involved lymph nodes is directly related to decreased 5-year overall survival for all pT stages according to United States Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry database. The National Quality Forum specifies that the presence of at least 12 lymph nodes in a surgical resection is one of the key quality measures for the evaluation of colorectal cancer. Therefore, the harvesting of a minimum of twelve lymph nodes is the most widely accepted standard for evaluating colorectal cancer. Since this is an accepted quality standard, a second attempt at lymph node dissection in the gross specimen is often performed when the initial lymph node count is less than 12, incurring a delay in reporting and additional expense. However, this is an arbitrary number and not based on any hard scientific evidence. We decided to investigate whether the additional effort and expense of submitting additional lymph nodes had any effect on pathologic lymph node staging (pN). We identified a total of 99 colectomies for colorectal cancer in which the prosector subsequently submitted additional lymph nodes following initial review. The mean lymph node count increased from 8.3 ± 7.5 on initial search to 14.6 ± 8.0 following submission of additional sections. The number of cases meeting the target of 12 lymph nodes increased from 14 to 69. Examination of the additional lymph nodes resulted in pathologic upstaging (pN) of five cases. Gross reexamination and submission of additional lymph nodes may provide more accurate staging in a limited number of cases. Whether exhaustive submission of mesenteric fat or fat-clearing methods is justified will need to be further investigated.

Comparison of two novel staging systems with the TNM system in predicting stage III colon cancer survival

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Adaptations of the TNM staging system that incorporate the Lymph Node Ratio (LNR) have been proposed for stage III colon cancer. This study compared the concordance of two novel staging systems and the TNM system with observed survival outcomes in stage III patients.

METHODS

A review of patients who underwent surgery for stage III colon cancer between January 2002 and April 2015 at a tertiary care centre was performed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the 5-year overall (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) rates, and the concordance probability was calculated to evaluate the discriminatory power of the staging systems.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-one patients were identified. For TNM stages IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC, 5-year OS was 83.4%, 67.6%, and 38.3%, respectively (P < 0.001). All three staging systems were independently predictive of OS and DFS (P < 0.001). However, the novel staging system by Sugimoto et al¹⁸ was the most favourable prognostic tool, with a concordance of 0.646 for DFS and 0.659 for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel staging system by Sugimoto et al¹⁸ was superior to the TNM system. Incorporating LNR into staging models for node positive colon cancers may improve survival information available to patients and potentially aid treatment decisions.

Restratification of survival prognosis of N1b papillary thyroid cancer by lateral lymph node ratio and largest lymph node size

The current 7th TNM staging stratifies N1b papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) patients without distant metastasis into either stage I or stage IV merely by an age threshold (45 years). To date, no studies have adequately quantified the mortality risk of PTC patients with N1b disease. We hypothesized that incorporating lymph node (LN) factors into the staging system would better predict cancer-specific mortality (CSM). A total of 745 nonmetastatic PTC patients with N1b disease were enrolled. We identified factors related to LNs and cut-points using Cox regression and time-dependent ROC analysis. New prognostic groupings were derived based on minimal hazard differences for CSM among the groups stratified by LN risk and age, and prediction of CSM was assessed. Lateral lymph node ratio (LNR) and largest LN size were significant prognostic LN factors at cut-points of 0.3 and 3 cm. Without LN risk (lateral LNR >0.3 or largest LN size >3 cm), stage IV patients had prognosis [adjusted HR 1.10 (98% CI 0.19-6.20); P = 0.906] similar to stage I patients with LN risk. Patients were restratified into three prognostic groups: Group 1, <45 years without LN risk; Group 2, <45 years with LN risk or ≥45 years without LN risk; and Group 3, ≥45 with LN risk. This system had a lower log-rank P-value (<0.001 vs. 0.002) and higher C-statistics (0.80 vs. 0.71) than the 7th TNM. New prognostic grouping using lateral LNR and largest LN size predicts CSM accurately and distinguishes N1b patients with different prognosis.

The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in colon cancer is independent of resection length

BACKGROUND

Lymph node ratio (LNR), the ratio of tumor-positive lymph nodes (+LN) to the total number of resected lymph nodes (rLN), predicts recurrence and survival in colon cancer. Variations in colonic resection length (RL) may influence rLN, +LN, or both, thereby potentially impacting LNR and its prognostic value in colon cancer.

METHODS

All colon cancer patients treated surgically at our center from 2004 to 2011 were included in an institutional review board-approved data repository (n = 1,039).

RESULTS

Larger RL was associated with increased rLN (ρ = .22; P < .001) but not with +LN (P = .21). In node-positive patients (n = 411), RL-adjusted LNR had weaker correlations with death (ρ = .338 vs .373, both P < .001) or metastatic disease (ρ = .303 vs .345; both P < .001) and a smaller area under the curve (death: .695 vs .715, metastasis: .675 vs .699). Findings were similar in segmental, extended segmental, and total colectomy subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Provided that resections are performed following standard oncologic principles, our analysis shows that RL does not significantly impact the prognostic value of LNR in colon cancer. Correcting LNR for RL seems redundant and may even act as noise distorting LNR values.

Oncologic Impact of Fewer Than 12 Lymph Nodes in Patients Who Underwent Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Followed by Total Mesorectal Excision for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

A minimum of 12 harvested lymph nodes (hLNs) are recommended in colorectal cancer. However, a paucity of hLNs is frequently presented after preoperative chemoradiation (pCRT) in rectal cancer and the significance of this is still uncertain. The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of hLNs on long-term oncologic outcomes. A total of 302 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent pCRT and curative resection between 1989 and 2009 were reviewed. Patients were categorized into 2 groups according to the number of hLNs: <12 versus ≥12 LN. The 2 groups were compared with respect to 5-year disease-free and overall survival. The optimal number or ratio of hLNs was investigated in subgroup analysis according to LN status. The median follow-up was 57 months. Patient characteristics other than age did not differ between the 2 groups. The group with <12 LNs had more favorable ypTNM and ypN stage than those with ≥12 LNs. However, the long-term oncologic outcomes were not significantly different between the 2 groups. In subgroup analysis of ypN(-), the group with <5 hLNs had the most favorable oncologic outcomes. In ypN(+) cases, a higher LN ratio tended to be associated with poorer 5-year overall survival. The paucity of hLNs in locally advanced rectal cancer after chemoradiation did not imply poor oncologic outcomes in this study. In addition, <5 hLNs in ypN(-) patients could reflect a good tumor response rather than suboptimal radicality.

Lymph node ratio improves TNM and Astler-Coller's assessment of colorectal cancer prognosis: an analysis of 761 node positive cases

BACKGROUND

Prognosis assessment of node-positive colorectal cancer patients by Astler-Coller (AC) and TNM classifications is suboptimal. Recently, several versions of lymph node ratio (LNR; ratio metastatic/examined nodes) have been proposed but are still mostly unused.

METHODS

The prognostic value of several criteria, including LNR (two classes-LNR1 and LNR2-identified by a 15% cut-off) was studied in 761 consecutive patients, from 2000 through 2010. The relationships between total examined nodes, N, T and LNR were also analysed. LNR1 and LNR2 patients' survival was analysed within AC and TNM subgroups, and then coupled with them.

RESULTS

Age, tumour location and LNR are independent factors predicting survival. The relationships between LNR, N stage and T stage with examined nodes suggest confusing factors. LNR allows for identification of subgroups with different survival within AC and TNM classifications (p < 0.0001). Patients with LNR class discordant from AC stage (LNR1-C2 and LNR2-C1) have a similar 5-year survival (54 and 57%, respectively). LNR2 and TNM stage IIIC define a poor 5-year prognosis (33%).

CONCLUSIONS

LNR is a powerful prognosis predictor, easily integrated with TNM and AC classifications to improve prognosis assessment and facilitate clinical use. Possible confusing factors should be considered in future studies.

Can horizontal diameter of colorectal tumor help predict prognosis?

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the relationship between the horizontal tumor diameter and prognosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients' records were analyzed retrospectively. Patient data, including age, gender, vertical penetration, anatomic location, differentiation of the tumor, tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage, survival rate, and disease-free survival, were analyzed to find out if there was any correlation with horizontal tumor diameter.

RESULTS

A total of 439 colorectal cancer patients were enrolled. Patients were stratified into two groups according to the horizontal tumor diameter (≤4.5 cm vs. >4.5 cm). Poorly differentiated tumors were significantly larger than other differentiation groups (p=0.003). The horizontal diameter increased with increase in T-stage (p<0.001). Similarly, the number of positive lymph nodes increased significantly as the size of the horizontal tumor diameter increased (p<0.001). The relationship between TNM staging and the horizontal diameter of tumors in both groups was examined, and it was found that the progression of tumor stage was accompanied by increased horizontal diameter (p<0.001). It was also found that the horizontal tumor diameter was not correlated with local recurrence (p=0.063). However, distant metastasis was higher in patients with a tumor larger than 4.5 cm (p=0.02). Although the disease-free survival was shorter in patients with a horizontal tumor diameter more than 4.5 cm, the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

There is a significant relation between horizontal diameter of the tumor and depth of the tumor, lymph node involvement, overall survival, and distant metastasis. Horizontal diameter of the tumor can possibly be used as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer patients.

The prognostic value of lymph node ratio and updated TNM classification in rectal cancer patients with adequate versus inadequate lymph node dissection

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to clarify whether the lymph node ratio (LNR) is superior to the updated TNM classification regarding the prognosis of stage III rectal cancer patients who have not undergone neoadjuvant therapy. The TNM system is based on the absolute number of lymph nodes involved, and the LNR takes into account involved and examined nodes.

METHODS

In 237 patients with stage III rectal cancer, we evaluated prognostic factors for 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and risk of distant metastases (DM) using the Kaplan-Meier method, with patients divided based on adequate versus inadequate lymph node dissection (≥12 vs. <12 lymph nodes examined). The updated TNM divides patients into four groups (1, 2-3, 4-6, and ≥7 involved nodes), while LNR divides patients into quartiles. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Among patients with adequate lymph node dissection, the distributions within the two systems were in agreement in 141/178 (79.2 %, kappa 0.721), and the predictive values for OS, DFS, and DM were similar. In patients with inadequate lymph node dissection, the classifications of both systems were concordant in only 13/59 (22 %, kappa 0.021). The pN system significantly under-staged patients, while the LNR classification was a better predictor of OS, DFS, and DM.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with adequate lymph node dissection, LNR staging does not add substantial information to the predictions of updated TNM lymph node staging. However, in patients with inadequate lymph node harvesting, the LNR compensates for the under-staging of the TNM classification and provides a better estimation of prognosis than the updated TNM system.

Pretreatment neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic aid in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancers(CRC) are the third most common cancer in the western world, with surgery preferred for management of non-metastatic disease and post surgical treatment usually arranged according to the TNM staging system. However, there is still prognostic variation between patients who have the same stage. It is increasingly recognized that variations within disease course and clinical outcome in colorectal cancer patients are influenced by not only oncological characteristics of the tumor itself but also host response factors. Recent studies have shown correlation between the inflammatory response and clinical outcomes in various cancers. The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been described as a marker for immune response to various stimuli including cancer.

MATERIAL-METHODS

Two hundred eighty-one CRC patients were included in our retrospective analysis, separated into two groups according to a cut-off value for the NLR. Patient data including age, gender, vertical penetration, anatomic location, and differentiation of the tumor, TNM stage, survival rate, and disease-free survival were analyzed for correlations with the NLR.

RESULTS

Using ROC curve analysis, we determined a cut-off value of 2.2 for NLR to be best to discriminate between patient survival in the whole group. In univariate analysis, high pretreatment NLR (p=0.001, 95%CI 1.483-4.846), pathologic nodal stage (p<0.001, 95%CI 1.082- 3.289) and advanced pathologic TNM stage (p<0.001, 95%CI 1.462-4.213) were predictive of shorter survival. In multivariate analysis, advanced pathologic TNM stage (p=0.001, 95%CI 1.303-26.542) and high pretreatment NLR (p=0.005, 95%CI 1.713-6.378) remained independently associated with poor survival.

CONCLUSIONS

High pre-treatment NLR is a significant independent predictor of shorter survival in patients with colorectal cancer. This parameter is a simple, easily accessible laboratory value for identifying patients with poorer prognosis.

Comparison of metastatic lymph node ratio staging system with the 7th AJCC system for colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prognostic value and staging accuracy of the metastatic lymph node ratio (rN) staging system for colorectal cancer.

METHODS

A total of 1,127 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent curative surgery between 2000 and 2011 at our institute were analyzed. Lymph nodes status was assigned according to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pN system and rN system. Patients with colon cancer (group 1, n = 652) and rectal cancer (group 2, n = 475) were analyzed separately.

RESULTS

The rN staging system was generated using 0.2 and 0.6 as the cutoff values of lymph node ratio and then compared with AJCC pN stages. Linear regression model revealed that the number of retrieved lymph node was related to number of metastatic lymph nodes. After a median follow-up of 46 months, the 5-year survival rates of patients with more than 12 lymph nodes (LNs) retrieved were better than cases with fewer than 12 LNs, while the differences were not obvious in rN classification.

CONCLUSIONS

The rN category is a better prognostic tool than the AJCC pN category for colorectal cancer patients after curative surgery.

The validity of predicting prognosis by the lymph node ratio in node-positive colon cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Because the TNM system disregards the number of lymph nodes dissected and inter-individual differences exist in the number of regional lymph nodes, the lymph node ratio (LNR), which is estimated by dividing the number of metastatic lymph nodes by the number of dissected lymph nodes, has been proposed as a prognostic factor in recent years. The purpose of the present study is to examine the validity of predicting prognosis using the LNR in node-positive colon cancer.

METHODS

Three hundred and eleven patients with lymph node metastases who underwent curative surgery for colon cancer at our department between 1992 and 2005 were enrolled. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between clinicopathological factors and prognosis.

RESULTS

Among the patients with ≥12 dissected lymph nodes, differentiation, invasion depth and TNM N category were found to be significant independent prognostic factors. On the other hand, among the patients with ≤11 dissected lymph nodes, differentiation and the LNR were found to be significant independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

Among the patients with ≤11 dissected lymph nodes, LNR was a significant independent prognostic factor.

Prognostic impact of the metastatic lymph node ratio on survival in rectal cancer

Purpose

Lymph-node metastasis is the most important predictor of survival in stage III rectal cancer. The number of metastatic lymph nodes may vary depending on the level of specimen dissection and the total number of lymph nodes harvested. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the lymph node ratio (LNR) is a prognostic parameter for patients with rectal cancer.

Methods

A retrospective review of a database of rectal cancer patients was performed to determine the effect of the LNR on the disease-free survival (DFS) and the overall survival. Of the total 228 patients with rectal cancer, 55 patients with stage III cancer were eligible for analysis. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analyses, after adjustments for potential confounders, were used to evaluate the relationship between the LNR and survival.

Results

According to the cutoff point 0.15 (15%), the 2-year DFS was 95.2% among patients with a LNR < 0.15 compared with 67.6% for those with LNR ≥ 0.15 (P = 0.02). In stratified and multivariate analyses adjusted for age, gender, histology and tumor status, a higher LNR was independently associated with worse DFS.

Conclusion

This study showed the prognostic significance of ratio-based staging for rectal cancer and may help in developing better staging systems. LNR 0.15 (15%) was shown to be a cutoff point for determining survival and prognosis in rectal cancer cases.

Qualitative and quantitative issues of lymph nodes as prognostic factor in colon cancer

For patients undergoing curative resections for colon cancer, the nodal status represents the strongest prognostic factor, yet at the same time the most disputed issue as well. Consequently, the qualitative and quantitative aspects of lymph node evaluation are thus being scrutinized beyond the blunt distinction between 'node positive' (pN+) and 'node negative' (pN0) disease. Controversy ranges from a minimal or 'least-unit' strategy as exemplified by the 'sentinel node' to a maximally invasive or 'all inclusive' approach by extensive surgery. Ranging between these two extremes of node sampling strategies are factors of quantitative and qualitative value, which may be subject to modification. Qualitative issues may include aspects of lymph node harvest reflected by surgeon, pathologist and even hospital performance, which all may be subject to modification. However, patient's age, gender and genotype may be non-modifiable, yet influence node sample. Quantitative issues may reflect the balance between absolute numbers and models investigating the relationships of positive to negative nodes (lymph node ratio; log odds of positive lymph nodes). This review provides an updated overview of the current controversies and a state-of-the-art perspective on the qualitative and quantitative aspects of using lymph nodes as a prognostic marker in colon cancer.

Lymph-node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in patients with stage III colorectal cancer: a retrospective study from the Middle East

Background

In this retrospective study, we evaluated the prognostic effect of positive lymph-node ratio (pLNR) on patients with stage III colorectal cancer (CRC). Our paper is the first analysis, to our knowledge, to deal with such data from the Middle East.

Methods

We analyzed the clinicopathological data of 535 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer at our institution between 1983 and 2003. The 164 patients diagnosed with stage III disease were divided into two categories based on lymph-node ratio (LNR) being the ratio of positive lymph nodes over total lymph nodes dissected: LNR ≤0.4 and LNR >0.4. We used Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate the prognostic effect of pLNR.

Results

The 10-year survival rate for the patients with stage IIIA, IIIB and IIIC cancers were 76%, 56% and 0% respectively (P = 0.014). Using pLNR of 0.4 as the cutoff point was found to yield clinically and significant results, with a significant difference in the outcomes of patients with pLNR ≤0.4 compared to those with pLNR >0.4 (hazard ratio = 5.25, 95% confidence interval = 1.2 to 22.1, P = 0.02).

Conclusion

The ratio-based staging (pLNR) of CRC is a more accurate and clinically useful prognostic method than the number of positive LNs resected or the total number of LNs retrieved for predicting the course of patients with stage III CRC.

Prognostic significance of the lymph node ratio regarding recurrence and survival in rectal cancer patients treated with postoperative chemoradiotherapy

Background/Aims

To evaluate the prognostic impact of the lymph node ratio (LNR: the ratio of positive lymph nodes to the total number of lymph nodes examined) on disease recurrence and survival among rectal cancer patients who received curative surgery and postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

Methods

Between 1995 and 2008, 124 patients with pathologic T3-4 or node-positive rectal cancer underwent curative surgery and postoperative CRT. Postoperative radiotherapy was delivered at a median dose of 50.4 Gy (range, 45 to 59.4 Gy) for 6 weeks. Chemotherapy consisted of a bolus injection of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in the first and last week of radiotherapy (91.9%) or daily capecitabine during radiotherapy (8.1%). Further adjuvant chemotherapy was administered after chemoradiation.

Results

The median follow-up was 5.1 years. In the multivariate analysis, pathologic N (pN) stage and lymphovascular invasion were significantly associated with disease-free survival and disease-specific survival (p<0.05). However, when the LNR with a cutoff value of 0.2 was included as a covariate in the model, the LNR was highly significant (p<0.001), and the pN stage lost its significance (p>0.05).

Conclusions

The LNR predicts recurrence and survival more accurately than pN stage. The pN stage and the LNR should be considered together when estimating the risk of disease recurrence among rectal cancer patients.

Dukes C colorectal cancer: is the metastatic lymph node ratio important?

PURPOSE

Although the regional lymph node status is essential for staging of colorectal cancer, the importance of the total number of collected nodes remains controversial. Our aim was to examine the impact of the metastatic lymph node ratio (LNR) on the survival of patients with Dukes C colorectal cancer.

METHODS

All patients with Dukes C histology were selected from a prospectively collected database of all colorectal cancers resected between 1997 and 2007 at our institution. Demographic, histopathological and adjuvant treatment data were collected. The total number of positive lymph nodes was divided by the total number of lymph nodes examined to calculate the LNR. Patients were categorised into LNR groups 1 to 5 according to cut-off points: ≤0.1, 0.21, 0.36, 0.6 and ≥0.61. Survival from the date of operation was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify those factors influencing survival.

RESULTS

Of 1,098 patients who underwent colorectal cancer resections, 41% were staged as Dukes C. Sixty-four percent of patients received chemotherapy. The median number of lymph nodes harvested and positive for tumour were 11 (range 1-52) and 4 (range 1-28), respectively. In patients who received chemotherapy, 5-year survival was 69.3% for LNR 1 and 23.6% for LNR 5. When no chemotherapy was given, the 5-year survival was 43.1% for LNR 1 and 8.7% for LNR 5.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evaluation of positive lymph nodes may not accurately stage Dukes C colorectal cancer. The assessment of the LNR is a useful prognostic method in this heterogenous group of patients.

Lymph node harvest in colon and rectal cancer: Current considerations

The prognostic significance of identifying lymph node (LN) metastases following surgical resection for colon and rectal cancer is well recognized and is reflected in accurate staging of the disease. An established body of evidence exists, demonstrating an association between a higher total LN count and improved survival, particularly for node negative colon cancer. In node positive disease, however, the lymph node ratios may represent a better prognostic indicator, although the impact of this on clinical treatment has yet to be universally established. By extension, strategies to increase surgical node harvest and/or laboratory methods to increase LN yield seem logical and might improve cancer staging. However, debate prevails as to whether or not these extrapolations are clinically relevant, particularly when very high LN counts are sought. Current guidelines recommend a minimum of 12 nodes harvested as the standard of care, yet the evidence for such is questionable as it is unclear whether an increasing the LN count results in improved survival. Findings from modern treatments, including down-staging in rectal cancer using pre-operative chemoradiotherapy, paradoxically suggest that lower LN count, or indeed complete absence of LNs, are associated with improved survival; implying that using a specific number of LNs harvested as a measure of surgical quality is not always appropriate. The pursuit of a sufficient LN harvest represents good clinical practice; however, recent evidence shows that the exhaustive searching for very high LN yields may be unnecessary and has little influence on modern approaches to treatment.

Dukes C colorectal cancer: is the metastatic lymph node ratio important?

PURPOSE

Although the regional lymph node status is essential for staging of colorectal cancer, the importance of the total number of collected nodes remains controversial. Our aim was to examine the impact of the metastatic lymph node ratio (LNR) on the survival of patients with Dukes C colorectal cancer.

METHODS

All patients with Dukes C histology were selected from a prospectively collected database of all colorectal cancers resected between 1997 and 2007 at our institution. Demographic, histopathological and adjuvant treatment data were collected. The total number of positive lymph nodes was divided by the total number of lymph nodes examined to calculate the LNR. Patients were categorised into LNR groups 1 to 5 according to cut-off points: ≤0.1, 0.21, 0.36, 0.6 and ≥0.61. Survival from the date of operation was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify those factors influencing survival.

RESULTS

Of 1,098 patients who underwent colorectal cancer resections, 41% were staged as Dukes C. Sixty-four percent of patients received chemotherapy. The median number of lymph nodes harvested and positive for tumour were 11 (range 1-52) and 4 (range 1-28), respectively. In patients who received chemotherapy, 5-year survival was 69.3% for LNR 1 and 23.6% for LNR 5. When no chemotherapy was given, the 5-year survival was 43.1% for LNR 1 and 8.7% for LNR 5.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evaluation of positive lymph nodes may not accurately stage Dukes C colorectal cancer. The assessment of the LNR is a useful prognostic method in this heterogenous group of patients.

Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Stage III Rectal Cancer

Purpose

Although nodal metastasis is the most powerful prognostic factor in rectal cancer, marked heterogeneity exists within stage III rectal cancer. Recent studies of rectal cancer have shown a prognostic superiority of the lymph node ratio (LNR) compared with N stage. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the LNR in the era of the 7th edition of the TNM classification.

Methods

We included 190 patients who underwent a curative resection for rectal cancer with nodal metastasis. The patients were divided into four groups on the basis of statistically calculated cut-off values as 0.21, 0.32, and 0.61.

Results

The LNR was an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS; P = 0.008) and for systemic recurrence-free survival (SRFS; P = 0.002). However, the LNR was not a predictive factor for local recurrence. When the N stage of the sixth TNM staging system was separately analyzed as a covariate, the LNR was also found to be a predictive factor for both OS and SRFS (P = 0.012 and P = 0.004, respectively). A LNR value of 0.21 offered the best cut off to separate patients into two prognostic groups.

Conclusion

The defined cut-off values of the LNR were an independent risk factor for OS and distant metastasis-free survival in patients with rectal cancer, irrespective of the sixth or the seventh version of the TNM classification, and the LNR should be considered as a prognostic variable in any future staging system.

Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage III colorectal cancer

AIM

Recent reports show that a positive metastatic to examined lymph nodes ratio (LNR) has prognostic value in malignancies. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of LNR in patients having resection for stage III colorectal cancer.

METHOD

From January 2000 to December 2006, patients who underwent resection for stage III colorectal carcinoma were included. All clinicopathological and follow-up data were prospectively collected. The impact of LNR and other clinicopathological factors on survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

The study included 533 (52.3% male) patients with a median age of 70 years. The median number of lymph nodes harvested and the median number of positive lymph nodes examined were 11 and 2, respectively. The median LNR was 0.263 (range, 0.03-1). After a median follow up of 52.65 months, the 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival were 55.9% and 49.4%. The patients were stratified into four groups according to LNR quartiles (1, LNR ≤ 0.125; 2, 0.125<LNR≤0.263; 3, 0.263<LNR≤0.500; 4, LNR>0.500). The 5-year overall and disease-free survival were 72.8%, 63.1%, 50.0%, 39.6% (P<0.001) and 68.5%, 54.1%, 47.2%, 29.9% (P<0.001), respectively, with increasing LNR groups. On multivariate analysis, age, T stage and LNR were independent predictors of both overall and disease-free survival. Subgroup analysis revealed that the LNR had a prognostic value for disease-free survival irrespective of number of lymph nodes harvested and location of tumour.

CONCLUSION

The LNR is an independent prognostic factor for survival in colorectal cancer and is superior to the pN category in TNM staging.

The prognostic significance of the lymph node ratio in axillary lymph node positive breast cancer

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the prognostic impact of the lymph node ratio (LNR; i.e., the ratio of positive to dissected lymph nodes) on recurrence and survival in breast cancer patients with positive axillary lymph nodes (LNs).

METHODS

The study cohort was comprised of 330 breast cancer patients with positive axillary nodes who received postoperative radiotherapy between 1987 and 2004. Ten-year Kaplan-Meier locoregional failure, distant metastasis, disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves. The prognostic significance of the LNR was evaluated by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 7.5 years. By minimum p-value approach, 0.25 and 0.55 were the cutoff values of LNR at which most significant difference in DFS and DSS was observed. The DFS and DSS rates correlated significantly with tumor size, pN classification, LNR, histologic grade, lymphovascular invasion, the status of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor. The LNR based classification yielded a statistically larger separation of the DFS curves than pN classification. In multivariate analysis, histologic grade and pN classification were significant prognostic factors for DFS and DSS. However, when the LNR was included as a covariate in the model, the LNR was highly significant (p<0.0001), and pN classification was not statistically significant (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The LNR predicts recurrence and survival more accurately than pN classification in our study. The pN classification and LNR should be considered together in risk estimates for axillary LNs positive breast cancer patients.

Comparison of positive lymph node ratio with an inflammation-based prognostic score in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Two prognostic scoring systems have been proposed in colorectal cancer: the pathologically based positive lymph node ratio (pLNR) and the inflammation-based modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS). This study compared these two scores with the tumour node metastasis (TNM) staging system in terms of cancer survival.

METHODS

Between 2003 and 2005, 206 patients, of mean(s.d.) age 69·9(10·6) (range 40-95) years, underwent curative resection for colorectal cancer in two centres. Age, sex, primary tumour site and whether radio/chemotherapy was given were recorded in addition to the three scores (TNM stage, pLNR and mGPS). Univariable and multivariable analyses of overall survival were performed.

RESULTS

Age, rectal cancer, TNM stage, pLNR and mGPS were significant factors in univariable analysis. On multivariable analysis, N category and tumour stage (I-III) were removed from the model, leaving pLNR and mGPS as independent predictors of overall survival: hazard ratio 1·51 (95 per cent confidence interval 1·24 to 1·84; P < 0·001) and 1·56 (1·18 to 2·08; P = 0·020) respectively. C-statistic analysis, used to compare pLNR and mGPS directly, found only pLNR to be significant (P < 0·001)

CONCLUSION

This study found pLNR to be the superior prognostic scoring system in determining long-term survival in patients undergoing resection for colorectal cancer.

The prognostic impact of the ratio of positive lymph nodes on survival of epithelial ovarian cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To study the prognostic significance of ratio of positive to examined lymph nodes (LNR) on survival of patients with node positive epithelial ovarian cancer (NPEOC).

METHODS

Data were obtained from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) from 1988 to 2006, and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression proportional hazard methods. Patients were divided into: stage IIIC group 1 (no macroscopic peritoneal disease), stage IIIC group 2 (macroscopic peritoneal disease), and stage IV.

RESULTS

A total of 6,310 women were included. The 5-year survival for stage IIIC groups 1, 2, and stage IV was 55.4%, 35.5%, and 20.3%, respectively (P < 0.001). Increasing LNR (<10%, 10-50%, and >50%) was associated with decreased survival from 51.5% to 38.1% to 27.0%, respectively, (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, LNR was an independent prognostic factor for survival after adjusting for extent of peritoneal disease, stage, grade, race, age, extent of lymphadenectomy and absolute number of positive nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

The impact of increasing LNR was strongly related to survival, especially in patients with no macroscopic peritoneal disease. Stratification of this subpopulation of node positive EOC based on nodal burden provides a significant prognostic value that may be considered in future staging and aid in management decisions.

Lymph node ratio as determined by the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system predicts survival in stage III colon cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic usefulness of the lymph node ratio (LNR) in stage III colon cancer using the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system.

METHOD

We analyzed data from 130 consecutive patients with stage III colon cancer. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard model analyses were used to evaluate prognostic effects.

RESULTS

Quartile analysis indicated that an LNR of 0.1638 was the best cut-off value with regard to predicting disease-free survival (DFS). Six patients had stage IIIA disease, 102 patients had stage IIIB disease, and 22 patients had stage IIIC disease. For patients with stage IIIB disease, the 3-year DFS for an LNR of <0.1638 (N = 87) and an LNR of ≥0.1638 (N = 15) was 79.0% and 50.0%, respectively (P = 0.015). For patients with stage IIIC disease, the 3-year DFS for an LNR of <0.1638 (N = 6) and an LNR of ≥0.1638 (N = 16) was 100% and 28.6%, respectively (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors found that 7th AJCC stage IIIB and stage IIIC patients are heterogeneous groups with respect to DFS, when stratified by LNR, and suggest that an LNR-based algorithm be devised for incorporation into the 7th AJCC staging system.

Lymph node harvest in colon cancer: influence of microsatellite instability and proximal tumor location

BACKGROUND

At least 12 harvested lymph nodes are recommended for proper staging of colon cancer. The effect of tumor-related factors associated with lymph node harvest is not well understood as data are lacking. We investigated tumor-related factors in relation to the number of lymph nodes harvested.

METHODS

Patient and tumor characteristics were investigated in relation to harvested lymph nodes (LN >or= 12), number of metastatic nodes, LN ratio (LNR), and prognosis with univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

An LN harvest >or=12 nodes was achieved in 36% of the patients. Having <12 nodes harvested was not associated with increased risk for locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, or decreased survival. Tumor size >5 cm, microsatellite instability (MSI), and proximal tumor location predicted a harvest of LN >or= 12. The highest rate (54%) of LN >or= 12 was found for MSI cancers [odds ratio (OR) 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-6.5; P = 0.011]. Multivariate analysis identified a proximal location as an independent factor of LN >or= 12 (adjusted OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.5-8.2; P = 0.003), with MSI an independent factor in stage II to III colon cancer (adjusted OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1-6.0; P = 0.026). To determine the best prognosticator, LNR was the only significant factor in the multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazards) with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.9 (95% CI 1.1-7.8; P = 0.038) for LNR 0.01-0.17 and an HR of 5.8 (95% CI 2.5-13.1; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal tumor location and microsatellite instability are associated with a higher number of lymph nodes harvested, pointing to possible underlying genetic and immunologic mechanisms. The LNR is an independent prognostic variable for colon cancer.

Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio in stage III colorectal cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Although nodal invasion represents one of the most powerful prognostic indicators in colorectal cancer, marked heterogeneity exists within stage III patients. Recently, the lymph node ratio (LNR), defined as the ratio of the number of positive nodes over the total number of examined nodes, was proposed to stratify outcome in stage III patients.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed for studies examining the prognostic significance of the LNR in colon or rectal cancer. Individual studies were assessed for methodological quality and summary data extracted. Hazard ratios from multivariate analyses were entered in a fixed-effects meta-analysis model.

RESULTS

In total, 16 studies were identified including 33,984 patients with stage III colon or rectal cancer. In all identified studies, the LNR was identified as an independent prognostic factor in patients with stage III cancer of the colon or rectum. The prognostic separation obtained by the LNR was superior to that of the number of positive nodes (N stage). The pooled hazard ratios for overall and disease-free survival were 2.36 (95% confidence interval, 2.14-2.61) and 3.71 (95% confidence interval, 2.56-5.38), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The LNR allows superior prognostic stratification in stage III colorectal cancer and should be validated in prospective studies.

The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in a population-based collective of colorectal cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

We analyzed 3 previously identified cut-off values of lymph node ratios (0.17, 0.41, and 0.69) in a large population-based collective of patients with colorectal cancer for their prognostic value.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The lymph node ratio (LNR) (relation of tumor-infiltrated to total examined lymph nodes) has a high prognostic impact, but the relevant cut-off values are not determined.

METHODS

Patients (N = 27,803) with a primary colorectal cancer diagnosed and operated in the Munich region between 1991 and 2006 were registered in the Munich Cancer Registry. Lymph node numbers and survival data were available for 17,309 patients with a mean follow-up of 5.9 years.

RESULTS

The mean number (+/-SD) of resected lymph nodes was 16.8 +/- 8.4. Twelve or more lymph nodes were resected in 76.8%. Estimated 5-year overall survival decreased significantly with increasing LNR: LNR = 0 in 71.4%, LNR 0.01 to 0.17 in 52.4%, LNR 0.18 to 0.41 in 33.3%, LNR 0.42 to 0.69 in 19.8%, and LNR > or = 0.70 in 8.3% (P < 0.001). Multivariable survival analyses identified separately both LNR and pN- category, as well as number of resected lymph nodes, patient's age, tumor location, pT-category, pM-status, R-status, tumor grade, and year of operation as independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

: The 3 cut-off values of LNRs had strong independent prognostic value in a population-based collective of patients with colorectal cancer. The LNR should be routinely reported and included in the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Nevertheless, the benefit of lymphadenectomy on survival is still unclear.

Impact of metastatic lymph node ratio in node-positive colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignant diseases in the world. Presently, the most widely used staging system for CRC is the tumor nodes metastasis classification system, which classifies patients into prognostic groups according to the depth of the primary tumor, presence of regional lymph node (LN) metastases, and evidence of distant metastatic spread. The number of LNs with confirmed metastasis is related to the severity of the disease, but this number depends on the number of LNs retrieved, which varies depending on patient age, tumor grade, surgical extent, and tumor site. Numerous studies and a recent structured review have demonstrated associated improvements in the survival of CRC patients with increasing numbers of LNs retrieved for examination. Hence, the impact of lymph node ratio (LNR), defined as the number of metastatic LNs divided by the number of LNs retrieved, has been investigated in various malignancies, including CRC. In this editorial, we review the literature demonstrating the clinicopathological significance of LNR in CRC patients. Some reports have indicated the advantage of considering the LNR compared to the number of LNs retrieved and/or LN status. When the LNR is taken into consideration for survival analysis, the number of LNs retrieved and/or the LN status is not always found to be a prognostic factor. The cut-off points for LNRs were proposed in numerous studies. However, optimal thresholds for LNRs have not yet received consensus. It is still unclear whether the LNR has more prognostic validity than N stage. For all these reasons, the potential advantages of LNRs in the staging system should be investigated in large prospective data sets.

Negative lymph node count is associated with survival of colorectal cancer patients, independent of tumoral molecular alterations and lymphocytic reaction

OBJECTIVES

The number of recovered lymph nodes is associated with good prognosis among colon cancer patients undergoing surgical resection. However, little has been known on prognostic significance of lymph node count after adjusting for host immune response to tumor and tumoral molecular alterations, both of which are associated with the lymph node count and patient survival.

METHODS

Among 716 colorectal cancers (stages 1-4) in two independent prospective cohorts, we examined patient survival in relation to the negative lymph node count and lymph node ratio (LNR; positive to total lymph node counts). Cox proportional hazard models were used to compute hazard ratio of deaths, adjusted for patient, specimen, and tumoral characteristics, including lymphocytic reactions, KRAS and BRAF mutations, p53 expression, microsatellite instability (MSI), the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), and LINE-1 methylation.

RESULTS

Compared with patients with 0-3 negative lymph nodes, patients with 7-12 and > or =13 negative nodes experienced a significant reduction in cancer-specific and overall mortality in Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank P<0.0001), univariate Cox regression (P(trend)<0.0001), and multivariate analysis (P(trend)<0.0003), independent of potential confounders examined. The benefit associated with the negative node count was apparent across all stages, although the effect was significantly greater in stages 1-2 than stages 3-4 (P(interaction)=0.002). In both stage 3 and stage 4, smaller LNR was associated with improved survival (log-rank P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The negative lymph node count is associated with improved survival of colorectal cancer patients, independent of lymphocytic reactions to tumor and tumoral molecular features including MSI, CIMP, LINE-1 hypomethylation and BRAF mutation.

Metastatic lymph node ratio is a more precise predictor of prognosis than number of lymph node metastases in stage III colon cancer

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to assess the value of metastatic lymph node ratio (LNR) in predicting disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with stage III adenocarcinoma of the colon.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1995 to 2003 inclusively, a total of 624 patients featuring stage III adenocarcinoma of the colon underwent curative resection. Of the 624 patients, an adequate number of lymph nodes (n > or = 12) had been harvested in 490 patients. These patients were stratified into LNR groups 1 (LNR < or = 0.4), 2 (0.4 < LNR < or = 0.7), and 3 (LNR > 0.7). Kaplan-Meier survival curve and log-rank test were used to evaluate the prognostic value of LNR. A Cox regression model was used for multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The 5-year DFS rate was 66.7% for patients with LNR1, 35.1% for those with LNR2, and 0% for patients with LNR3 (p < 0.0001). In T3/4LNR1 patients (n = 411), there was no difference in survival between those with N1 stage and those with N2 stage. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that N stage (number of positive lymph nodes) was not a significant factor when LNR was taken into consideration.

CONCLUSIONS

LNR is a more precise predictor of 5-year DFS than number of positive lymph nodes (N stage) in patients with stage III colon cancer.