Additional endoscopic procedures instead of urgent surgery for retained common bile duct stones

Outcome of forgotten biliary stents for more than five years-A two-decade experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Prolonged biliary stenting may lead to complications such as cholangitis, stentolith and stent migration. There is limited data on forgotten biliary stents for more than five years in literature. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the complications and outcomes in patients who forgot to get their biliary stents removed or exchanged for more than five years.

METHODS

The study population included patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and plastic biliary stent placements in a tertiary care center from 1990 to 2022 for benign biliary diseases. Loss to follow-up and subsequent forgotten stent for more than five years were observed in 40 patients who underwent ERCP during this study period. We retrospectively analyzed the indications of stenting, present status of stent, complications and outcomes in the study patients.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study patients was 51.5 ± 11.5 years with 27 females. Indications of biliary stent placement were choledocholithiasis (33, 82.5%), bile leak (3, 7.5%), benign biliary stricture (2, 5%) and choledochal cyst (2, 5%). The mean duration of forgotten stent was 5.9 ± 3.6 years. Presenting symptoms were abdominal pain (37, 92.5%), fever (26, 65%) and jaundice (32, 80%). Most commonly placed stent was 7 French double pigtail of 10 cm length. Complications in the study patients were cholangitis (35, 87.5%), internal migration (2, 5%), pancreatitis (1, 2.5%) and portal hypertension (1, 2.5%). The outcomes were stone removal (30, 90.9%), stent removal (31, 77.5%), stent reinsertion (19, 47.5%), broken stent (3, 7.5%) and surgery (2, 5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged duration (> 5 years) of forgotten stent is uncommon and is observed most commonly in patients with choledocholithiasis. The most common complication of long duration of forgotten stents was cholangitis followed by internal migration, pancreatitis and portal hypertension. Stone and stent removal was successful in a majority of patents, while surgery was required in less number of patients.

Preventive Saline Irrigation of the Bile Duct to Reduce the Rate of Residual Common Bile Duct Stones Without Intraductal Ultrasonography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) has been proven efficacious in the removal of CBD stones. Even after endoscopic stone removal, recurring cholangitis due to a residual common bile duct (CBD) stone is prevalent in clinical practice with a residual recurrence rate of 4-24% after successful stone retrieval. This comprehensive study and meta-analysis aimed to determine if preventive saline irrigation of the bile duct (PSIB) reduces the amount of residual CBD stones. Through a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science until November 20, 2022, we identified 164 articles comparing the efficacy of PSIB and non-PSIB post-endoscopic CBD stone removal. After stringent selection, three studies were included for meta-analysis using ReviewManager (ReVman version 5.4.1; Cochrane, London, UK). Using a random effect (RE) model, we derived a pooled odds ratio (OR) with confidence interval (CI) (95%CI). A total of three studies have been included in the analysis. Out of which, two are randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one is a non-randomized study. Out of 323 patients, 157 underwent PSIB after an endoscopic stone removal of CBD stones to reduce the residual of CBD stones, whereas 166 did not undergo saline irrigation (non-PSIB). In our analysis, PSIB significantly reduced the risk of residual stones (OR: 0.22, 95%CI: 0.11-0.45). However, there was no notable link between PSIB and post-irrigation cholangitis (OR: 1.08, 95%CI: 0.21-2.21). Although not statistically significant, PSIB showed a trend toward lowered risks of post-procedural pancreatitis (OR: 0.65), bleeding (OR: 0.68), and other complications (OR: 0.64). PSIB effectively reduces residual CBD stones after endoscopy, offering a cost-effective alternative to invasive procedures such as intraductal ultrasound (IDUS). However, larger RCTs are needed to validate its definitive role.

Effects of Saline Irrigation of the Bile Duct to Reduce the Rate of Residual Common Bile Duct Stones: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Study

OBJECTIVES

In clinical practice, recurrent cholangitis due to residual common bile duct (CBD) stone occurs frequently even after endoscopic stone removal. This study aimed to determine whether preventive saline irrigation of the bile duct (PSIB) after endoscopic removal of CBD stones would decrease the residual CBD stones.

METHODS

In this multicenter, prospective, randomized study, patients who received endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for removal of CBD stone were randomized to either receiving PSIB after stone removal (PSIB group) or not receiving PSIB (non-PSIB group). Patients were prospectively followed up and the presence of residual CBD stones was evaluated within 6 months after endoscopic stone removal.

RESULTS

A total of 148 patients were enrolled and completed follow-up (73 in PSIB group and 75 in non-PSIB group). The two groups were similar with regard to baseline characteristics. Residual CBD stones were detected in 22 patients (14.9%). The incidences of residual CBD stones were 6.8% in PSIB group and 22.7% in non-PSIB group (P=0.010). Multivariate analysis revealed that the performance of PSIB and the presence of only a single-CBD stone were the significant factors for the decrease of the occurrence of the residual CBD stones. Although, procedure time was slightly longer in PSIB group (22.0 vs 19.2 min, P=0.037), no significant difference was observed in the procedure-related complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PSIB could reduce the residual CBD stones without increasing complications. Considering the efficacy and safety, routine PSIB after endoscopic CBD stone removal seems to be preferred (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01425177).

Complex biliary stones management: cholangioscopy versus papillary large balloon dilation - a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

 Endoscopic removal of biliary stones has high success rates, ranging between 85 % to 95 %. Nevertheless, some stones may be challenging and different endoscopic methods have evolved. Papillary large balloon dilation after sphincterotomy is a widely used technique with success rates ranging from 68 to 90 % for stones larger than 15 mm. Cholangioscopy allows performing lithotripsy under direct biliary visualization, either by laser or electrohydraulic waves, which have similar success rate (80 % - 90 %). However, there is no study comparing these 2 techniques.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 From April 2014 to June 2016, 100 patients were enrolled and randomized in 2 groups, using a non-inferiority hypothesis: cholangioscopy + electrohydraulic lithotripsy (group 1) and endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (group 2). The main outcome was complete stone removal. Adverse events were documented. Mechanical lithotripsy was not performed. Failure cases had a second session with crossover of the methods.

RESULTS

 The mean age was 56 years. 74 (75.5 %) patients were female. The initial overall complete stone removal rate was 74.5 % (77.1 % in group 1 and 72 % in group 2, P  > 0.05). After second session the overall success rate achieved 90.1 %. Procedure time was significantly lower in group 2, - 25.2 min (CI95 % - 12.48 to - 37.91). There were no significant differences regarding technical success rate, radiologic exposure and adverse events.

CONCLUSION

 Single-operator cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy and papillary large balloon dilation are effective and safe approaches for removing complex biliary stones.

Endoscopic biliary stenting in irretrievable common bile duct stones: stent exchange or expectant management-tertiary-centre experience and systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Conventional endoscopic duct clearance may not be possible in up to 10%-15% of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Sphincterotomy and biliary drainage by endoprosthesis have for many years been the mainstay of management in irretrievable stones. Recent years have seen the advent of sphincteroplasty or cholangioscopically-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) permitting duct clearance in majority of cases. However, when bile duct clearance is not possible, options include long-term stenting followed by elective stent exchange (ESE) 6-12 monthly or permanent stent insertion (PSI) in selected cases, but it is not clear which management strategy among ESE and PSI is preferable.

METHODS AND AIMS

A retrospective review of all patients in Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust who underwent plastic stent insertion for biliary access for difficult CBDS from January 2006 to December 2011 was undertaken. Adult patients with irretrievable CBDS who had plastic stent insertions throughout the follow-up period were included. Patients who underwent PSI and ESE annually were retrospectively reviewed to determine the long-term outcomes. A detailed systematic review was also performed, examining the outcomes of CBDS managed with stents.

RESULTS

During the study period, 674 patients underwent 1769 biliary-stent-related procedures; of which, 246 patients met our inclusion criteria. 201 patients had subsequent duct clearance. 45 patients were, therefore, included in the final analysis, 28 of whom underwent annual ESEs and 17 PSIs. Patients in the PSI group had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores compared with the ESE group. In the PSI group, 9/17 patients presented acutely with blocked stents, 5 of whom presented within 12 months. 2/9 patients were severely ill and died within a fortnight following the repeat endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In the ESE group, 4/28 patients had duct clearance in subsequent ERCPs, 1/28 patient presented with a blocked stent, and no biliary-related deaths were observed. The mean numbers of ERCPs performed were 0.52 and 1.95 in the PSI and ESE groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 50% of patients treated with long-term stenting re-presented acutely with stent blockage, though many of these were before 12 months, meaning planned stent exchange would not have affected the outcome. Duct clearance using all possible modalities is the preferred option, but where not possible, management with biliary stenting either with elective exchange or permanent stenting remains a possibility for carefully selected patients, though maybe best suited to those with limited life expectancy.

Short-Term Biliary Stent Placement Contributing Common Bile Duct Stone Disappearance with Preservation of Duodenal Papilla Function

Aims. To investigate the effect of biliary stent placement without endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) on common bile duct stones (CBDS) disappearance and the contribution of preserving the duodenal papilla function to reduce recurrence of CBDS. Methods. Sixty-six patients admitted for acute obstructive cholangitis due to CBDS who underwent biliary stent placement without EST for 2 years from March 2011 were evaluated retrospectively. The second endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed for treatment of CBDS 3 to 4 months after the first ERCP. We estimated the rate of stone disappearance at the time of second ERCP. Results. CBDS disappearance was observed in 32 (48.5%) of 66 patients. The diameter of the bile ducts and the diameter of CBDS in patients with CBDS disappearance were significantly smaller than in those with CBDS requiring extraction (p = 0.007 and p < 0.001, resp.). Stone disappearance was evident when the diameter of bile ducts and that of CBDS were <10 and 7 mm, respectively (p = 0.002). Conclusions. Short-term stent placement without EST eliminates CBDS while preserving duodenal papilla function and may be suitable for treating CBDS in patients with nondilated bile ducts and small CBDS.

Preventive saline irrigation of the bile duct after the endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones

BACKGROUND

Small stone fragments after an endoscopic stone extraction for choledocholithiasis may act as the nidus for recurrent choledocholithiasis. Therefore, efforts to eliminate the nidus might reduce the recurrence of choledocholithiasis and cholangitis related to choledocholithiasis.

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to determine whether an additional preventive saline irrigation of the bile duct after the endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones would decrease residual stones and the recurrence of cholangitis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed for the consecutively collected data about the patients who underwent the complete endoscopic treatment for common bile duct stone.

RESULTS

Among 99 patients, 45 patients underwent saline irrigation. Residual stones were detected in 18 patients (18.2 %). The incidences of residual stones were 8.9 % (4 of 45 patients) in the irrigation group and 25.9 % (14 of 54 patients) in the non-irrigation group (P = 0.037). In multivariate analysis, preventive saline irrigation was found to be the only significant factor for the decrease of residual stones (HR = 0.258, P = 0.039). When analyzing the occurrence of recurrent cholangitis and the procedure related to complications, there were no significant differences according to the performance of preventive saline irrigation of the bile duct.

CONCLUSIONS

Preventive saline irrigation could reduce the residual common bile duct stones without complications.

Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones

Endoscopy is widely accepted as the first treatment option in the management of bile duct stones. In this review we focus on the alternative endoscopic modalities for the management of difficult common bile duct stones. Most biliary stones can be removed with an extraction balloon, extraction basket or mechanical lithotripsy after endoscopic sphincterotomy. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy or mechanical lithotripsy has been shown to be effective for management of difficult to remove bile duct stones in selected patients. Ductal clearance can be safely achieved with peroral cholangioscopy guided laser or electrohydraulic lithotripsy in most cases where other endoscopic treatment modalities have failed. Biliary stenting may be an alternative treatment option for frail and elderly patients or those with serious co morbidities.

Endoscopic biliary stenting for irretrievable common bile duct stones: Indications, advantages, disadvantages, and follow-up results

BACKGROUND

The advantages of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) over open surgery have made it the predominant method of treating patients with choledocholithiasis. After sphincterotomy, however, 10%-15% of common bile duct (CBD) stones cannot be removed with a basket or balloon. Methods for managing "irretrievable stones" include surgery; mechanical, intraductal shock wave, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; chemical dissolution; and biliary stenting. Endoscopic biliary stent insertion, which is frequently used in specific situations, has both advantages and disadvantages. To maximize the advantages and minimize the complications of biliary endoprosthesis, it is important to recognize its proper indications and to apply the technique in proper situations.

DATA SOURCES

We reviewed all publications cited in Pubmed and published through July 2011 on biliary endoprosthesis in patients with irretrievable CBD stones. We analyzed the indications, advantages, disadvantages, and long-term follow-up results of this technique.

RESULTS

Despite the occurrence of related complications, such as cholangitis, endoscopic placement of an endoprosthesis may reduce stone size, allowing later clearance of unextractable stones. Permanent biliary stenting may be a definitive treatment in selected elderly patients who are poor candidates for surgery.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic biliary stenting remains a simple and safe method for patients with stones difficult to manage by conventional endoscopic methods and those patients unfit for surgery or at high surgical risks.

Metallic or plastic stent for bile duct obstruction in ampullary cancer?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although ampullary cancer is a relatively uncommon malignancy, it is frequently associated with biliary obstruction. Endoscopic biliary drainage is regarded as a palliative treatment of choice for patients with inoperable ampullary cancer. However, there are no data concerning choice of stent in this patient population. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of metallic and plastic stents for biliary obstruction in patients with ampullary cancer.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients (15 men and 22 women; median age 74.7 years) with ampullary cancer treated with endoscopic biliary drainage were enrolled. Metallic and two plastic stents were placed in 17 and 20 patients, respectively. Clinical success, stent patency, and stent malfunction were evaluated.

RESULTS

Clinical success was achieved in all patients (100%). The median period of stent patency was 132.7 days in the metallic stent group and 128.5 days in the plastic stent group (P > 0.05). Stent malfunctions developed in 17 and 19 patients in the metallic and plastic stent groups, respectively. Stent occlusion occurred in 15 (88.2%) and 15 (75%) patients and stent migration occurred in two (11.8%) and four (20%) patients in the metallic and plastic stent groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic biliary drainage using metallic or plastic stents is effective for initial endoscopic palliation in patients with obstructive jaundice because of ampullary cancer. Although metallic and plastic stents had similar clinical effect, it seems reasonable to choose two plastic stents as the first option in patients with ampullary cancer considering the cost-effectiveness.

Biliary stents in the millennium

Biliary stents have now been in use for over two decades. Although a plethora of literature has been published on them, this review article is unique in its attempt to summarize important landmark trials and their implications on the management of various pancreatico-biliary disorders. This article will cover the various types of stents currently being used, established and upcoming indications, techniques of placement, and complications associated with stent use.

Complex biliary stones: treatment with removable self-expandable metal stents: a new approach (with videos)

BACKGROUND

Complex biliary stones often require temporary stent placement before a repeat attempt at extraction. To date, covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMSs) have not been formally investigated for this indication.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of CSEMSs in patients with retained complex biliary stones.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Large quaternary-care center.

PATIENTS

Thirty-six patients (24 women) with complex biliary stones with incomplete stone clearance after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) with biliary sphincterotomy.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients with incomplete stone clearance after ERC with biliary sphincterotomy underwent temporary placement of CSEMSs, with subsequent removal before repeat stone extraction.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Success achieving immediate biliary drainage and eventual complete duct clearance. Procedure-related complications were also assessed.

RESULTS

CSEMS placement was successful in establishing immediate biliary drainage in all 36 patients. Complete duct clearance at repeat ERC was achieved in 29 of 35 patients after a mean duration of 6.4 weeks. Four of the remaining 6 patients underwent sequential CSEMS placement, with eventual duct clearance after multiple ERCPs. There were no complications related to biliary obstruction. One patient died of a nonbiliary cause. Of the total 42 CSEMSs placed, there were 4 cases (9.5%) of clinically insignificant stent migration.

LIMITATIONS

Single-center experience, retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

CSEMSs permit management of complex biliary stones, but require multiple sessions. The cost-effectiveness of this technique needs further investigation.

De novo stent-stone complex after long-term biliary stent placement: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and endotherapy

BACKGROUND

Long-term and permanent biliary stenting have been reported in many studies and are infrequently practiced in selected patients with irretrievable common bile duct stones and biliary strictures.

PATIENTS

Here we report 3 new cases and review 7 other cases of de novo stent-stone complex formation after long-term biliary stent placement.

INTERVENTIONS

De novo stent-stone complexes developed in 3 young patients after unintended long-term biliary stent placement of 4.5 to 11 years' duration. The stent-stone complexes were successfully removed during ERCP with electrohydrolic lithotripsy (EHL) in combination with choledochoscopy or extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) with mechanical lithotripsy (ML).

RESULTS

The de novo radiolucent stones formed around and above the stent in the proximal and end part of the stent. The stones were generally large with a diameter>2 to 3 cm. The stent-stone complex usually assumed a 1-sided dumbbell configuration inside the bile duct. The mean duration to clinical presentation after initial biliary stenting is 5.64 years (range 2-11 years).

CONCLUSIONS

It is important to keep in mind that a biliary stent can act as a nidus for new biliary stone formation around the stent after long-term placement. We recommend that the optimal endotherapy in this situation is ML for the free-floating complexes with short stents, and choledochoscopy with EHL or laser lithotripsy and ESWL for impacted complexes with longer stents.

An audit of the outcome of long-term biliary stenting in the treatment of common bile duct stones in a general hospital

BACKGROUND

This study audited the clinical outcome of a cohort of patients with choledocholithiasis treated with long-term biliary stenting in order to determine the feasibility of this practice.

METHODS

Over 2 years, 83 patients with symptomatic choledocholithiasis were treated with long-term stenting because they either refused further treatments or were medically unfit for further procedures after the initial endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Recurrence of clinical events, need for stent change, morbidity, and mortality were analyzed. As a secondary analysis, published data on long-term biliary stenting were reviewed.

RESULTS

ERCP and biliary stenting were successful in all cases with no complications. The mean follow-up was 19 months (1-103 months). The median number of ERCPs performed was 1 (1-4). The mean duration of stent patency was 12.4 months (1-54.8 months). A total of 28 clinical events (cholangitis, 71%) occurred in 24 patients during follow-up, for a late complication rate of 33.7%. ERCP was repeated and the stents changed on 15 occasions in 11 asymptomatic patients with abnormal liver function tests detected on routine follow-up. No biliary-related mortality occurred. Review of published data revealed a mean late complication rate of 22.4% (0%-64%), a biliary-related mortality rate of 3.5% (0%-21.1%), and a nonbiliary-related mortality rate of 20.8% (0%-60.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term biliary stenting is a feasible option for patients who decline or are medically unfit for further elective endoscopic or surgical procedures. Close follow-up is mandatory to detect and treat late complications.

Endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography imaging for pancreaticobiliary pathology: the gastroenterologist's perspective

With advances in noninvasive radiologic technology, additional adjunctive techniques are developing, and the roles for ERCP and EUS are continuously changing. In a diagnostic setting, ERCP is currently best reserved for patients with a high likelihood of needing endoscopic therapy, and EUS is especially useful for cases in which other imaging techniques have been inconclusive or are of inferior diagnostic capability. In a therapeutic setting, ERCP and EUS retain important roles in the management of both benign and malignant pancreatic and biliary disease. Certainly, technological advances also directly affect these modalities and expanded applications for ERCP and EUS for the pancreas and biliary tract are anticipated.

Transnasal extraction of residual biliary stones by Seldinger technique and nasobiliary drain

BACKGROUND

Complete endoscopic clearance of bile duct stones is unsuccessful in up to 30% of patients at the first attempt, necessitating further endoscopic procedures. A novel transnasal approach for extraction of these residual stones using Seldinger technique and a nasobiliary drain was evaluated.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients with residual biliary stones after ERCP underwent transnasal extraction under fluoroscopy without sedation. A 0.035-inch guidewire was inserted though the previously placed nasobiliary drain into the intrahepatic ducts. The nasobiliary drain was removed, leaving the guidewire in place. A double-lumen extraction balloon was inserted over the guidewire. Multiple withdrawal maneuvers of the inflated balloon were performed to clear the bile duct.

RESULTS

Residual stones were present in the extrahepatic and intrahepatic ducts in, respectively, 18 and 3 patients. The mean largest stone diameter was 5.9 mm (range, 3-12 mm). Seventeen patients had a single stone. Complete duct clearance was achieved in 17 patients (81%). The procedure was unsuccessful because of guidewire dislodgement in 3 patients and inability to pass the guidewire through the nasobiliary drain in 1 patient. There was no procedure-related complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Transnasal extraction of residual biliary stones after ERCP with the Seldinger technique is safe and feasible with reasonable success and can avoid the inconvenience and cost of a repeat ERCP.

Endoscopic management of biliary tract disease

New investigations, evaluation of controversial issues, and advances in technology continue to shape the endoscopic management of biliary disorders. This article discusses recent literature related to the diagnosis and therapy of biliary tract disease. Specifically, the diagnosis and management of choledocholithiasis, complications of biliary endoscopy and potential preventive measures, roles for endosonography in the evaluation of biliary disease, and endoscopic therapy of postoperative liver transplantation complications are reviewed. Recent advances in biliary stents and the use of cholangioscopy in biliary disorders are also assessed.

Pancreatic and biliary disorders in the elderly

Structural and functional changes in the biliary tract and pancreas associated with advanced age are well documented in the literature and must be taken into account in evaluating patients with possible biliary and pancreatic disorders. The relationship between normal, age-related physiologic changes and various pancreatico-biliary diseases is not well defined. Elderly patients may present with severe biliary and pancreatic disease that may pose difficult management problems because of coexisting medical illnesses. Despite these challenges, all but the most frail elderly patients can benefit from appropriate medical, endoscopic, and surgical therapy.

[Endoscopic treatment of obstructive jaundice at a second level national health system hospital]

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The difficulty of performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in our patients in the reference hospitals within a few days of diagnosis of obstructive jaundice led us to perform this technique in our center. We expected to perform a small number of ERCP annually. We analyzed the success rate of initial biliary drainage and the complications of this procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective study. From 1997-1999 we carried out 240 ERCP. In 128 patients, 140 ERCP were performed for obstructive jaundice (58,3%). The final diagnosis was choledocholithiasis in 69 patients (54%), tumors in 35 (27%), dilatation of the biliary tract without obstruction at cholangiography in 21 (17%) and benign stenosis of the biliary tract in 3 (2%).

RESULTS

The mean procedure time for ERCP was 5.26 ( 2.8) days. Cholangiography was successfully performed in 117 patients (91.4%). Effective therapeutic endoscopy was performed in 111 patients (86.7%). Jaundice was resolved in 62 patients (90%) with choledocholithiasis, 55 (80%) by stone removal and in 7 (10%) by prosthesis. Resolution was also achieved in 25 (71.5%) tumors, mainly by prosthesis, and in 100% of patients with benign stenosis. In all patients with dilatation of the biliary tract without obstruction, biliary sphincterotomy was performed. Complications were found in 15 patients (11.7%) and two (1.56%) died.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients with obstructive jaundice can be satisfactorily treated in a center with our characteristics. However, in tumors, the figures for drainage were slightly lower than those reported in the medical literature.

Pigtail stents: an alternative in the treatment of difficult bile duct stones

BACKGROUND

When bile duct stones cannot be removed after sphincterotomy by balloon or basket extraction, stent placement can serve as a bridge to additional procedures. Biliary stents may also fragment large stones, allowing them to pass spontaneously or making them easier to extract at a later time.

METHODS

Twenty patients with difficult to extract bile duct stones were prospectively studied. The patients underwent ERCP and placement of a 7F double-pigtail stent in the bile duct for 6 months.

RESULTS

In seven patients (35%), repeat ERCP revealed no stones in the duct. Four patients (20%) had small stone fragments that were easily extracted with a balloon. Six patients (30%) continued to have large stones at repeat ERCP; two of these patients eventually underwent surgery, the duct was cleared in three with mechanical lithotripsy, and one had long-term stenting. Three patients (15%) did not undergo repeat ERCP and were therefore treated with long-term stent placement.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that placement of a pigtail biliary stent is a safe and effective alternative in the management of bile duct stones that resist extraction if lithotripsy is not available. After 6 months of stent placement, stones may pass or become easier to remove in a significant proportion of patients.

Acute (ascending) cholangitis

Cholangitis is an infection of an obstructed biliary system, most commonly due to common bile duct stones. Bacteria reach the biliary system either by ascent from the intestine or by the portal venous system. Once the biliary system is colonized, biliary stasis allows bacterial multiplication, and increased biliary pressures enable the bacteria to penetrate cellular barriers and enter the bloodstream. Patients with cholangitis are febrile, often have abdominal pain, and are jaundiced. A minority of patients present in shock with hypotension and altered mentation. There is usually a leukocytosis, and the alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin levels are generally elevated. Noninvasive diagnostic techniques include sonography, which is the recommended initial imaging modality. Standard CT, helical CT cholangiography, and magnetic resonance cholangiography often add important information regarding the type and level of obstruction. Endoscopic sonography is a more invasive means of obtaining high-quality imaging, and endoscopic or percutaneous cholangiography offers the opportunity to perform a therapeutic procedure at the time of diagnostic imaging. Endoscopic modalities currently are favored over percutaneous procedures because of a lower risk of complication. Treatment includes fluid resuscitation and antimicrobial agents that cover enteric flora. Biliary decompression is required when patients do not rapidly respond to conservative therapy. Definitive therapy can be performed by a surgical, percutaneous, or endoscopic route; the last is favored because it is the least invasive and has the lowest complication rate. Overall prognosis depends on the severity of the illness at the time of presentation and the cause of the biliary obstruction.

Stenting or surgery for treatment of irretrievable common bile duct calculi in elderly patients?

BACKGROUND

The value of endoprostheses for long-term management of bile duct stones has not been formally established. We retrospectively compared the results of this method versus surgical approach in elderly patients (>70 years) with endoscopically irretrievable bile duct stones.

METHODS

From January 1990 to September 1998, 68 patients over 70 years old underwent endoscopic biliary stenting (group A: 31 patients) or surgery (group B: 37 patients) for endoscopically irretrievable bile duct stones. The groups were similar with regard to gender, age, clinical presentation, ASA score, and number and size of the stones.

RESULTS

Successful biliary drainage was achieved in 31 of 31 patients of group A and 37 of 37 patients of group B. Early complications occurred in 12.9% of group A versus 29.7% of group B (P <0.005) and early mortality was 0% in group A versus 2.7% of group B (P = NS). Over the long-term follow-up, late complications occurred in 35.5% of group A versus 8.1 % of group B (P <0.001). Three cases of biliary-related death occurred in group A versus 0 in group B (9.6% versus 0%: P <0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

For immediate bile duct drainage endoprostheses proved a safe and effective alternative to surgery in elderly patients with endoscopically irretrievable bile duct stones. Because of the risk of subsequent complications, their use as a definitive treatment should be restricted to highly selected cases.

Applications of endoscopic surgery in pediatric patients

Although the advent of endoscopic technology is expanding the fields of reconstructive and aesthetic surgery in adults, there have been few reports of the use of this technology in the pediatric population. Because of their minimally invasive nature, yet wide range of exposure, endoscopic techniques have much appeal for this age group. Here we present our experience with endoscopic pediatric plastic surgery. From February of 1995 to August of 1997, 104 patients underwent 139 procedures utilizing 5- and 10-mm endoscopes. There were 58 male and 46 female patients. The mean age at surgery was 5.6 years (range, 3 weeks to 19 years). The most common type of procedures performed were insertion of tissue expanders (n = 34), excision of benign head and neck masses (n = 27), torticollis release (n = 20), excision of vascular lesions (n = 13), and miscellaneous procedures, (n = 10). There were 26 complications in 139 procedures (19 percent). Seventeen (65 percent) were in the tissue expander group. The rest were scattered among the groups with other diagnoses. Although there did not appear to be a specific type of complication associated with endoscopy, 77 percent occurred in the first 2 months of our study. This suggests a relatively steep technical learning curve. These results demonstrate that endoscopic techniques are eminently applicable in the pediatric population, providing the benefits of small and remote incisional wounds, with complication rates that are comparable with those of conventional open surgical treatment.

THERAPEUTIC BILIARY ENDOSCOPY: EXPERIENCE AT A SERVICE HOSPITAL

Therapeutic Biliary Endoscopy (TBE) is becoming a popular mode of treatment for patients with obstructive jaundice. This paper highlights our early experience of TBE at Armed Forces Medical College and Command Hospital (SC), Pune with this mode of treatment. TBE was used as a primary therapeutic option in 46 patients with obstructive jaundice. The age of the patients ranged from 11 to 80 (mean and SD:45.5 ± 16) years and majority 29 (63%) were males. The cause of obstructive jaundice in these patients was choledocholithiasis (n=31), benign biliary stricture (n=8), post cholecystectomy recurrent stones (n=3), carcinoma of pancreas (n=3) and papillary stenosis (n-1). Endoscopic Sphincterotomy (ES) was technically successful in all the 46 patients and brought prompt symptomatic relief in 43 patients. Sixteen patients (34.8%) required additional drainage such as stenting or nasobiliary drain. In patients with choledocholithiasis, bile duct could be cleared of stones in 29 (93.5%) patients and in two surgical removal was required. Of the remaining patients, surgery was required in 4 (50%) patients with benign biliary structure, in 1 (33.3%) of those with malignant stricture and none of the patients presenting with papillary stenosis or recurrent bile duct stones after cholecystectomy. Complications were seen in only two patients (4.4%): one had mild acute pancreatitis and another had GI bleed, which did not require blood transfusion. Both the complications were self-limiting. No procedure related deaths were noted. Endoscopic therapy, thus, a simple, effective and safe method of treatment in patients with choledocholithiasis and selected patients with malignant biliary obstruction.

Common bile duct stenting for choledocholithiasis: a district general hospital experience

The favoured treatment of common bile duct stones is endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction. The management of those cases where duct clearance is not possible is controversial. At our institution it has been policy to insert an endoluminal stent. We report a retrospective review of the outcome of patients stented for common bile duct stones. The study population was 14 men and 22 women, with a median age of 73 years (range 23-89 years). Treatment-related morbidity was seen in nine patients (25%), comprising cholangitis (5), pancreatitis (3), and cholecystitis (1). Three of these patients died; all were over the age of 75 years and had been stented on a long-term basis. These data suggest that endobiliary stents can be employed with an acceptable complication rate. We suggest that patients under the age of 75 years be stented only as a temporising measure, but that patients over 75 years or those unfit on physiological grounds can be stented on a long-term basis as definitive treatment.

Biliary stenting for management of common bile duct stones

Large and multiple common bile duct stones may defy extraction despite an adequate endoscopic papillotomy. We treated 65 patients with symptomatic bile duct stones with endoscopic stents after failed attempts at stone extraction. Of the 65 patients, bile duct stones were extracted in eight at a second attempt, 29 underwent elective surgery and 28 patients were followed with the stent in situ for 21-52 months (median 42 months). During follow up, two patients had recurrent pain and two required surgery. The remaining 24 patients remained asymptomatic. Biliary stenting is a safe and effective mode of treatment for common bile duct stones in patients who have failed stone extraction after endoscopic papillotomy.

Choledocholithiasis and gallstone pancreatitis

Gallstones are commonly found within the main bile duct (MBD) of patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Retained MBD stones are a common cause of obstructive symptoms and complications. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and sphincterotomy (ES) is the recommended modality for both the detection of such stones and their extraction. Recent trials of ERCP in conjunction with laparoscopic cholecystectomy suggest that it should be reserved for use post-operatively. Gallstones within the MBD are the most common single cause of acute pancreatitis. Initial treatment is supportive, although new agents designed to suppress the systemic inflammatory response are under development and have proved beneficial in clinical trials. Severe cases should be treated with systemic antibiotics and early removal of the obstructing stones by ERCP and ES. Prophylactic cholecystectomy is recommended to prevent further attacks of gallstone pancreatitis.

Biliary endoprostheses in elderly patients with endoscopically irretrievable common bile duct stones: report on 117 patients

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction can clear the bile ducts in 85% to 90% of patients. In case endoscopic stone extraction fails, insertion of a biliary endoprosthesis is an alternative.

METHODS

Biliary endoprostheses were inserted in 117 patients (73 women and 44 men, median age 80 years). Follow-up was achieved by contacting referring physicians and general practitioners.

RESULTS

Biliary drainage was established in all patients. Early complications occurred in 10 patients (9%) with a fatal outcome in 1. In 59 patients the endoprosthesis was a temporary measure before elective surgery or repeat endoscopy. Further treatment in these 59 patients caused only mild complications and there were no deaths. Endoprostheses were inserted as permanent therapy in 58 patients. Median follow-up in these 58 patients was 36 months (range, 1 to 117 months). A total of 34 complications occurred in 23 patients (40%), cholangitis being the most frequent. During follow-up, 44 patients died, 9 as a result of a biliary-related cause.

CONCLUSIONS

These data favor temporary use of biliary endoprostheses in patients with endoscopically irretrievable bile duct stones. However, as a permanent therapy, late complications occur in many patients and the risk increases proportionally in time. Therefore, permanent biliary stenting should preferably be restricted to patients unfit for elective treatment at a later stage and with a short life expectancy.

Retained common bile duct stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy: temporary and longterm treatment with biliary stenting

Basket extraction after endoscopic sphincterotomy failed to clear the bile ducts immediately in 85 (30%) of 283 consecutive patients with common bile duct stones. Temporary biliary drainage was established by the insertion of a single 7 Fr double pigtail stent before further planned endoscopic attempts at stone removal. In 84 patients (21 male: 63 female, mean age 77 years) this measure relieved biliary obstruction, mean serum bilirubin falling from 101 to 18 umol/l by the time of the second endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Six patients died from non-biliary causes with temporary stents in situ. Common bile duct stone extraction was achieved endoscopically in 50 of the remaining 79 patients after a mean of 4.3 months (range 1-12), 34 (68%) requiring only one further procedure. Three patients were referred for biliary surgery. Single stents were also effective for longterm biliary drainage in the remaining 26 elderly patients with unextractable stones. The main biliary complication of stenting was 13 episodes of cholangitis but all except one responded to medical treatment and early stent exchange. If common bile duct stones remain after endoscopic sphincterotomy, a single 7 Fr double pigtail stent is effective and safe for temporary biliary drainage before further endoscopic attempts at duct clearance and for longterm biliary drainage especially in the old and frail.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and stent placement in the management of large common bile duct stones

Management of large common bile duct (CBD) calculi is controversial. Endoscopic treatment is fraught with difficulty, particularly when stones are over one centimetre in diameter and the patient's coagulation is deranged. Between 1988 and 1993, 56 patients have been managed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and stent placement as the initial treatment for large CBD calculi. Complete follow up has been possible in 50 cases (89.3%). The median age was 73.5 years (range 29-92) and primary presenting symptoms were jaundice (n = 39), cholangitis (n = 6) or abdominal pain (n = 5). Median bilirubin was 99 mumol/L (range 7-926) and 60% of the patients had deranged clotting with a median thrombotest of 61%. Stones ranged in size from 0.9 to 4.5 cm (median 1.6 cm). Treatment was with a 7F 'pigtail' stent in 39 cases and a 10F straight stent in 11 patients. Morbidity occurred in 12% of cases with two deaths (4%). Stents remained in place for a median of 1 month (range 0.2-59). Definitive treatment of CBD stones, once the jaundice and sepsis had settled, involved surgery in 24 patients and repeat ERCP with sphincterotomy +/- mechanical lithotripsy in 17 cases. Nine patients remain alive and well with their stents still in place. Initial management of large CBD calculi by ERCP and stent placement carries a low morbidity and mortality and is a useful adjunct in the management of a difficult clinical problem.

Management of bile duct stones in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

The introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has resulted in increased options for the management of bile duct stones and has stimulated a fundamental reappraisal of the situation before the laparoscopic era. This article reviews the natural history of bile duct stones and details the different ways in which they may now be treated. New areas of controversy are highlighted and the need for further studies is emphasized.

Biliary tract emergencies. Acute cholecystitis, acute cholangitis, and acute pancreatitis

Acute cholecystitis, acute cholangitis, and acute pancreatitis represent the most common biliary tract emergencies. Most are due to gallstones in the gallbladder and bile ducts. Acute cholecystitis is treated by surgery in most cases. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy may become more common in the future for treatment of acute cholecystitis as well as in cases of acute cholangitis and pancreatitis if the bile ducts are cleared of gallstones. Although the role of either surgery or endoscopic treatment may be more clearly defined in some biliary tract emergencies, in other situations either modality may be appropriate or they may compliment each other. Most biliary emergencies should be managed by gastroenterologists, surgeons, and radiologists working together in a harmonious fashion.

Non-surgical management of bile duct stones refractory to routine endoscopic measures

Endoscopic sphincterotomy and percutaneous approaches to the biliary tract have revolutionized the treatment of bile duct stones. Both the endoscopic and transhepatic approaches are less invasive than open surgery. This is an advantage for the mostly elderly and frail patients with common bile duct stones. Other patients with intrahepatic stones, e.g. young patients with oriental lithiasis, may also profit from the non-surgical approach. In this latter group it is often difficult for the surgeon to obtain access to the stone-bearing bile ducts. Due to the anatomical situation, size or impaction of stones the non-surgical approach, including mechanical disintegration, may primarily fail. Several techniques such as intracorporeal lithotripsy using electrohydraulic probes or laser light, extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy or direct contact dissolution are now available and often allow complete clearance of the bile ducts. If a kidney lithotripter with radiographic devices is available, it should be used after an attempt at mechanical lithotripsy has failed (Figure 1). According to the literature, experience with this method is greater than with any other 'third-step approach'. The procedure is simple, relatively safe and successful in approximately 80% of patients. However, in at least one third of patients, several sessions have to be performed and further endoscopy is frequently required for extraction of fragments. Intracorporeal techniques may become the procedure of choice in the future, at least in patients with common bile duct stones. At the moment, however, the different devices are still not fully developed and too susceptible to damage. A further major drawback, especially with high-energy electrohydraulic intracorporeal lithotripsy, is the danger of bile duct injury or even perforation, so that most procedures must be performed under optical control. The use of contact dissolution cannot generally be recommended. Treatment with mono-octanoin or modified mono-octanoin solvents takes too long, is often not successful and has a high rate of side-effects. MTBE may shorten the procedure considerably, but is suitable only for cholesterol stones, and the danger of spill-over into the intestine with absorption and systemic side-effects has to be weighed against the probability of success.

Treatment of common bile duct stones using mono-octanoin

A retrospective analysis of 48 patients undergoing mono-octanoin infusion via nasobiliary catheter following failure of endoscopic extraction of common bile duct stones is reported. Among 35 patients who received a complete course of treatment, nine (26 per cent) had duct clearance by the completion of the infusion and a further eight on subsequent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (total 49 per cent). Two patients had a successful stone extraction after enlargement of the sphincterotomy (total non-surgical clearance rate 54 per cent). None of five patients with stones greater than 2 cm in diameter had stone clearance at the completion of the infusion and only one at subsequent ERCP. Among 13 patients receiving an incomplete course of treatment seven had clear ducts on repeat ERCP (54 per cent). Mono-octanoin infusion via a nasobiliary catheter is of limited value in the management of this difficult group of patients, although it may be successful in some.

Six hundred patients with gallstones

A total of 610 patients with gallstones were treated over an 8-year period in a single surgical unit. Of these patients, 384 had cholecystectomy, 86 surgical duct exploration and 140 endoscopic sphincterotomy. Four patients died after cholecystectomy (1%), but there were no deaths after the treatment of duct stones. The proportion of patients with duct stones having endoscopic sphincterotomy with the gallbladder in situ rose considerably during the 8-year period, from about 20% to 75%. Gallstones tend to present in the elderly as duct stones, and in the young as gallbladder stones. The majority of patients over 75 years of age had endoscopic sphincterotomy, whereas the younger patients were usually treated surgically.

Endoscopic management of bile duct stones

The surgical risk of common duct exploration for the treatment of biliary calculi is considerably higher than that of cholecystectomy. Therefore, introduction of endoscopic sphincterotomy in 1974 was a major advance. It has become the therapy of choice in cholecystectomized patients or in those with an increased operative risk. Endoscopic sphincterotomy has a mortality rate of around 1% and a morbidity rate of 7%. These figures compare favourably with open surgery, especially in old patients. The procedure fails in about 10% of all patients referred for endoscopic removal of their calculi. However, several techniques have been described or are currently under evaluation to overcome these failures: intracorporeal or extracorporeal lithotripsy, long-term stenting of the bile duct, or direct application of solvents. Long-term follow-up studies show that between 2% and 20% of successfully managed patients may develop recurrent stones, mainly caused by bile stasis and infection. Patients with a functioning gall-bladder and no concomitant gall-bladder stones probably do not require cholecystectomy after successful endoscopic treatment of their choledochal stones. While endoscopic stone removal has replaced surgery in the elderly frail patients it has no major advantages in the young and fit patients, especially when the gall-bladder is still in situ.

Common bile duct stones. Detection and removal with endoscopic techniques

Common bile duct stones are frequently discovered after cholecystectomy or are the first sign of biliary tract disease. Because detection usually requires cholangiography and reoperation is technically difficult, risky, and thus undesirable, nonsurgical methods of identifying and removing the stones have evolved. Among these, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with endoscopic retrograde sphincterotomy and stone extraction is the method of choice after cholecystectomy. As newer methods of dealing with biliary disease evolve and alter the spectrum of complications, ERCP will remain an essential diagnostic and management tool.

Endoscopic biliary endoprosthesis in elderly patients with large bile duct stones: long-term follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To assess the long-term evolution of elderly patients with large or impacted bile duct stones, treated by an endoscopic biliary endoprosthesis.

DESIGN

Case series.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

Twenty-three patients with a mean (+/- SD) age of 86 +/- 5 years (range, 77-97 years). On admission, 96% were highly symptomatic. These patients represent 8.4% of a group of 273 elderly patients (greater than or equal to 70 years old) with choledocholithiasis treated by endoscopic sphincterotomy between November 1984 and May 1989.

INTERVENTION

Endoscopic insertion of a biliary endoprosthesis.

RESULTS

Eight-seven percent (20/23) remained completely free of biliary symptoms and died of unrelated illness (48%) after a mean follow-up of 23 months or are still alive (39%) with a mean follow-up of 52 months. In four cases, this asymptomatic evolution now extends for more than 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Insertion of a biliary endoprosthesis offers an effective method for long-term treatment of non-extractable biliary stones in elderly patients.

Methyl tert-butyl ether in the endoscopic treatment of common bile duct radiolucent stones in elderly patients with nasobiliary tube

Methyl tert-butyl ether is an effective dissolution agent for cholesterol stones. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of methyl tert-butyl ether on radiolucent common bile duct stones in patients in whom endoscopic extraction has failed. From September 1985 to September 1987, 1374 patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in our Liver Unit. An endoscopic sphincterotomy was indicated in 195 patients with common bile duct (CBD) stones because of an age over 65 years and/or surgical contraindications. Endoscopic sphincterotomy was efficient in 187 patients, allowing complete stone removal in association with conventional endoscopic methods and mechanical lithotripsy in 170 patients. Twelve of the 17 patients with failure of conventional endoscopic treatments were either older than 75 years (11 patients; mean age, 86 +/- 4.5 years) or exhibited a surgical contraindication. Stones completely obstructed CBD in six patients and had a diameter exceeding 25 mm in the six other patients. These subjects were selected for stone dissolution by methyl tert-butyl either (MTBE) according to the following protocol. MTBE was directly infused into CBD through a nasobiliary catheter, twice daily for 4-13 days (mean, seven days). Bile duct opacification, repeated after MTBE treatment, revealed the complete disappearance of CBD stones in one patient, a decrease in stone size in five patients and no change in the six other patients. MTBE treatment was well tolerated except in three patients who complained from transient abdominal pains and nausea. At the second attempt of endoscopic treatment, CBD stones were found to be softened and easily broken up, allowing a complete clearance in six patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mechanical lithotripsy of large common bile duct stones using a basket

Experience with the Olympus basket mechanical lithotriptor (BML-1Q) in crushing large common bile duct stones before their endoscopic removal is reported. From January 1988 to January 1990, 68 patients with common duct stones too large to be extracted by Dormia baskets or balloon catheters after sphincterotomy were treated with the BML system. The largest stones in each patient ranged from 1.0 to 4.9 cm in diameter. Fifty-seven patients required one session of lithotripsy, ten patients two sessions and one patient three sessions; 26 patients required further endoscopic extraction of stone fragments after successful lithotripsy. The stones were successfully crushed by the BML system and the ducts cleared in 55 patients (81 per cent). In 13 patients mechanical lithotripsy failed because the stones could not be engaged in the lithotriptor basket. In one patient the stone was crushed with the Soehendra lithotriptor, six patients were successfully managed by electrohydraulic lithotripsy through a 'mother and baby' endoscope, indwelling stents were inserted in four patients and two patients underwent surgery.

A 10 year single centre experience of percutaneous and endoscopic extraction of bile duct stones with T tube in situ

A non-randomised single centre study of 226 consecutive patients referred over 10 years with retained common bile duct stones and a T tube in situ or a cholecystostomy tube are reported. Percutaneous extraction was attempted in 204 and endoscopic extraction in 68 patients. Percutaneous clearance was achieved in 158 (77.5%) patients and endoscopic clearance in 52 (76.5%) patients. Six of 153 (3.9%) patients followed after percutaneous treatment suffered major complications (pancreatitis, cholangitis, or tract perforation). Three of 67 (44%) patients followed after endoscopic treatment suffered major complications (pancreatitis, cholangitis, or bleeding). When the initial method of treatment failed, the alternative was used, resulting in an overall success rate of bile duct clearance of 94.3%. It is concluded that percutaneous and endoscopic methods of bile duct clearance in patients with a T tube in situ are equally effective, carrying similar complication rates. This study has helped to clarify the indications and efficacy of these alternative treatments.

Endoscopic sphincterotomy: the whole truth

An 8 year experience of 602 patients (median age 76 years) referred for endoscopic management of common bile stones is reported. No patient referred for treatment has been excluded. A diagnostic cholangiogram was achieved in 94 per cent and sphincterotomy was accomplished in 91.5 per cent. The bile ducts were demonstrated to be completely cleared of stones in 491 (81.6 per cent) of 602 patients. A mean number of 1.9 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography examinations per patient were necessary to achieve this result. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy, which were strictly defined, occurred in 10.5 per cent of patients although five patients had two complications (total complication rate 11.3 per cent). The 30-day mortality rate was 2.2 per cent, seven of 13 deaths (1.2 per cent) occurring as a direct result of sphincterotomy. There have been statistically significant improvements in bile duct clearance and complication rates with increasing experience of endoscopists.