Oesophageal motility, luminal pH, and electrocardiographic-ST segment analysis during spontaneous episodes of angina like chest pain

Exertional esophageal pH-metry and manometry in recurrent chest pain

AIM: To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of 24-h and exertional esophageal pH-metry and manometry in patients with recurrent chest pain.

METHODS: The study included 111 patients (54% male) with recurrent angina-like chest pain, non-responsive to therapy with proton pump inhibitors. Sixty-five (59%) had non-obstructive lesions in coronary artery angiography, and in 46 (41%) significant coronary artery narrowing was found. In all patients, 24-h esophageal pH-metry and manometry, and treadmill stress tests with simultaneous esophageal pH-metry and manometry monitoring were performed. During a 24-h examination the percentage of spontaneous chest pain (sCP) episodes associated with acid reflux or dysmotility (symptom index, SI) was calculated. Patients with SI > 50% for acid gastroesophageal reflux (GER) were classified as having GER-related sCP. The remaining symptomatic individuals were determined as having non-GER-related sCP. During the stress test, the occurrence of chest pain, episodes of esophageal acidification (pH < 4 for 10 s) and esophageal spasm with more than 55% of simultaneous contractions (exercise-provoked esophageal spasm or EPES) were noted.

RESULTS: Sixty-eight (61%) individuals reported sCP during 24-h esophageal function monitoring. Eleven of these (16%) were classified as having GER-related sCP and 53/68 (84%) as having non-GER-related sCP. The exercise-provoked chest pain during a stress test occurred in 13/111 (12%) subjects. In order to compare the clinical usefulness of 24-h esophageal function monitoring and its examination limited only to the treadmill stress test, the standard parameters of diagnostic test evaluation were determined. The occurrence of GER-related or non-GER-related sCP was assumed as a “gold standard”. Afterwards, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated. These parameters expressed a prediction of GER-related or non-GER-related sCP occurrence by the presence of chest pain, esophageal acidification and EPES. Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of chest pain during the stress test predicting any sCP occurrence were 28%, 35% and 80%, respectively, predicting GER-related sCP were 42%, 0% and 83%, respectively, and predicting non-GER-related sCP were 57%, 36% and 83%, respectively. Similar values were obtained for exercise-related acidification with pH < 4 longer than 10 s in the prediction of GER-related sCP (44%, 36% and 92%, respectively) and EPES in relation to non-GER-related sCP (48%, 23% and 84%, respectively).

CONCLUSION: The presence of chest pain, esophageal acidification and EPES had greater than 80% specificity to exclude the GER-related and non-GER-related causes of recurrent chest pain.

The evaluation of gastro-oesophageal reflux and oesophagocardiac reflex in patients with angina-like chest pain following cardiologic investigations

The aims of the study were to assess pathogenetic role of gastro-oesophageal reflux and the oesophago-cardiac reflex in subjects with chest pain. To evaluate the prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and the oesophago-cardiac reflex in patients with different coronary artery diseases and in coronary spasm.

PATIENTS, METHODS

Fifty-one patients with chest pain were enrolled after detailed cardiologic evaluation including coronary angiography. The prevalence of gastrooesophageal reflux disease was established by symptom analysis, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring, and oesophageal manometry. The oesophago-cardiac reflex was established by oesophageal acid perfusion test (0.1 N HCl and 0.9% NaCl, 120-120 ml/10 min in a blinded manner) combined with transoesophageal Doppler echocardiographic coronary flow measurement in the left anterior descending artery.

RESULTS

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease was established in 45% (23/51) of the patients. Oesophageal acid perfusion decreased the coronary flow velocity in 49% (25/51) of the patients indicating the presence of oesophago-cardiac reflex. Oesophago-cardiac reflex was present more frequently in patients with coronary spasm, than in patients with either epicardial coronary artery disease or microvascular coronary disease (p<0.02). Patients with oesophago-cardiac reflex had higher DeMeester scores, increased number of reflux episodes, fraction time below pH 4, and prolonged acid reflux episodes (p<0.05 for each parameter).

CONCLUSIONS

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is frequently established in patients with either epicardial or microvascular coronary artery disease or with coronary spasm. The oesophago-cardiac reflex was more frequently observed in patients with coronary spasm. The combination of oesophageal acid perfusion test and transoesophageal Doppler echocardiographic coronary flow measurement seems to be a useful method for the detection of this reflex. Patients with prolonged gastro-oesophageal acid reflux episodes, erosive oesophagitis and coronary spasm may be at higher risk for the development of linked-angina.

A review of the atypical manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Manifestations of atypical gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) are varied, and the presentation of atypical symptoms may occur in the absence of typical symptoms. The most sensitive and specific investigation for GORD is pH monitoring, and its application in atypical disease is utilized throughout this paper as a basis for correlating disease and pathogenesis. The less well-known areas of laryngeal manifestations, particularly chronic hoarseness and globus, are discussed in addition to recent work on orodental manifestations. Well-known areas of cardiac and respiratory manifestations, which include chronic cough and asthma, are also reviewed. Evidence from clinical trials indicates that aggressive anti-reflux therapy in patients with atypical symptoms can be effective. Where appropriate, medical therapy may involve long-term proton pump inhibitor, although further research outlining the roles of other therapies such as surgery is awaited.

Utility of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH and motility monitoring in noncardiac chest pain: report of 90 patients and review of the literature

It is unclear whether prolonged motility monitoring improves the diagnostic yield of standard esophageal tests in patients with noncardiac chest pain. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic value of ambulatory 24-hr pH and pressure monitoring in patients with noncardiac chest pain. Stationary manometry, edrophonium testing, and ambulatory pH and motility studies were performed in 90 consecutive patients with recurrent chest pain and normal coronary angiograms. Normality limits of ambulatory 24-hr motility were established in 30 healthy controls. The diagnoses of specific esophageal motility disorders (nutcracker esophagus and diffuse esophageal spasm) by stationary and ambulatory manometry were discordant in 48% of the patients. Edrophonium testing was positive in 9 patients, but correlated poorly with esophageal diagnoses. During ambulatory studies, 144 chest pain events occurred in 42 patients, and 72 (50%) were related to esophageal dysfunction. Strict temporal associations of events with esophageal dysfunction in relation to ambulatory 24-hr pH/motility scores permitted four patient categorizations: true positives (event-related and abnormal tests), N = 15; true negatives (event-unrelated and abnormal tests), N = 10; reduced esophageal pain threshold (event-related and normal tests), N = 4; and indeterminate origin (event-unrelated and normal tests), N = 13. Overall, 19 patients (21%) had a probable esophageal cause for chest pain (14 esophageal motility disorder, 4 acid reflux, 1 both). In conclusion, ambulatory manometry increases the diagnostic yield of standard esophageal testing in noncardiac chest pain, but the gain is small. Causes of chest pain other than high esophageal pressures and acid reflux must still be sought in most patients with chest pain of unknown origin after a negative cardiac work-up.

Sustained esophageal contraction: a marker of esophageal chest pain identified by intraluminal ultrasonography

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Intraluminal pressure recording systems have not demonstrated predictable esophageal motor correlates of unexplained chest pain. This study used continuous high-frequency intraluminal ultrasonography to characterize esophageal contraction at the time of spontaneous and provoked chest pain.

METHODS

Intraluminal pressure, pH, and ultrasound images of the esophagus were recorded for a maximum of 24 hours in 10 subjects with unexplained chest pain. Changes in esophageal muscle thickness were measured as a marker of muscle contraction. Ten additional subjects with suspected esophageal chest pain were studied after edrophonium chloride injection to provoke symptoms. Ten healthy subjects were studied as controls.

RESULTS

Eighteen of 24 spontaneous chest pain episodes were preceded by a sustained esophageal contraction (SEC) detected on ultrasonography (mean duration, 68.0 seconds). This motor pattern was not accompanied by changes in intraluminal pressure. Four of 24 asymptomatic control periods were accompanied by SEC, although these contractions were of shorter mean duration (29.0 seconds; P < 0.001). SEC was observed in 5 subjects with a positive chest pain response to edrophonium and in none of the 5 subjects with a negative response. SEC was not detected in normal subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a strong temporal correlation between a previously unrecognized esophageal motor event, SEC, and both spontaneous and provoked esophageal chest pain.

A prospective study of oesophageal function in patients with normal coronary angiograms and controls with angina

AIMS

To compare the incidence of oesophageal abnormalities and their correlation with chest pain in patients with normal coronary angiograms, and in controls with angina.

PATIENTS

Sixty one patients with normal coronary angiograms (NCA group) referred to a single cardiac centre between March 1990 and April 1991; 25 matched controls with confirmed coronary artery disease (CAD group).

SETTING

Cardiac referral centre and oesophageal function testing laboratory.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Oesophageal manometry, provocation tests, and 24 hour ambulatory pH monitoring.

RESULTS

Simultaneous contractions were more common (6.7% versus 0.8%, p < 0.01), and the duration of peristaltic contractions was longer (2.9 versus 2.4 seconds, p < 0.01) in the NCA group than in the CAD group. There were no group differences in the amplitude of peristaltic contractions, and none had nutcracker oesophagus. Ten (16%) patients with NCA and no patients with CAD had diffuse spasm (p = 0.03). Twenty one (34%) patients with NCA, and five (20%) patients with CAD had abnormal gastro-oesophageal reflux (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in the number of patients whose pain was temporally related to pH events. Particular chest pain characteristics, or the presence of additional oesophageal symptoms, were not predictive of an oesophageal abnormality.

CONCLUSION

Oesophageal function tests commonly implicate the oesophagus as a source of pain in patients with normal coronary angiograms. With the exception of simultaneous contractions during manometry however, the incidence of abnormalities and in particular the correlation of pH events with chest pain are as common in patients with normal coronary angiograms as in controls with angina. The oesophagus may often be an unrecognised source of pain in both groups of patients.

Chest pain at rest in patients with coronary artery disease. Myocardial ischemia, esophageal dysfunction, or panic disorder?

Severe nonexertional (resting) chest pain may be due to myocardial ischemia, esophageal dysfunction, psychiatric disorder, or any combination thereof and frequently poses a difficult diagnostic challenge. Our aim was to investigate causes of chest pain in patients with coronary artery disease. Forty-five patients with angiographically proven obstructive coronary lesions and recurrent chest pain at rest were studied; 18 had refractory pain despite cardiac therapy (problem group), and 27 had documented myocardial ischemia (control group). Esophageal manometry, edrophonium provocation, 24-hr pH studies, and psychiatric interview were performed in all patients. The clinical evolution and the outcome of specific treatment during follow-up was used to establish the etiology of chest pain. Esophageal dysfunction was identified in all problem patients and in 52% of controls, and the esophagus was incriminated as the source of pain in 8 (44%) and 5 (18.5%), respectively. After a mean follow-up of 49 months (range 24-76 months), the cause of chest pain in the problem group was identified as panic disorder in 9 patients (50%), gastroesophageal reflux in 6 (33%), esophageal dysmotility in 2 (11%), and gallstone disease in 1 (6%). Of the control patients, 18 (67%) had ischemic pain alone, while 9 had concurrent causes: panic disorder in 5 (19%) and esophageal dysfunction in 4 (15%). Esophageal dysfunction and psychiatric disturbances are common in patients with coronary artery disease presenting with resting chest pain, and may contribute to patients' symptoms.

Ambulatory esophageal manometry/pH-metry discriminates between patients with different esophageal symptoms

Ambulatory esophageal manometry/pH-metry has been used primarily in patients with chest pain of presumed esophageal origin, and it is unclear whether the discriminating power of this test applies to other esophageal symptoms. In the present study, prolonged ambulatory manometry/pH recordings were compared in 17 healthy controls, 12 patients with atypical chest pain, and 11 patients with chest pain and nonstructural dysphagia using the Synectics microdigitrapper system. Chest pain patients tended to have higher values for all the pH variables, but their esophageal motility parameters were no different than controls. On the other hand, the chest pain plus dysphagia group was characterized by a significantly lower proportion of propagated contractions between 10 and 5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter. This group also tended to have a higher frequency of high-amplitude or prolonged-duration contractions. In comparison to the results of standard stationary esophageal manometry, the prolonged ambulatory recordings were more sensitive in detecting esophageal motor dysfunction in the two patient groups. This study suggests that quantitative analysis of ambulatory pH/motility recordings is a sensitive method of evaluating patients with suspected esophageal dysfunction.

Coronary flow reserve and oesophageal dysfunction in syndrome X

The relative prevalence of abnormalities of coronary flow reserve and oesophageal function was ascertained in 32 syndrome X patients with typical angina chest pain, a positive exercise test, and normal coronary arteries. Coronary flow reserve in response to a hyperaemic dose of papaverine was measured using an intracoronary Doppler catheter positioned in the left anterior descending coronary artery. An abnormal coronary flow reserve was defined as being < 3.0. Patients were investigated for oesophageal dysfunction by manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring. Thirteen patients had an impaired coronary flow reserve (group 1) and 19 patients had a normal flow reserve (group 2). Eight of the 13 group 1 patients (62%) and 13 of the 19 group 2 patients (68%, p = NS) had evidence of oesophageal dysfunction on either manometry or pH studies. Therefore, a total of 26 (81%) syndrome X patients had either an abnormality of coronary flow reserve or oesophageal dysfunction suggesting that chest pain in these patients may be due to myocardial ischaemia or oesophageal dysfunction, thus confirming the heterogeneous nature of this syndrome. The prevalence of oesophageal abnormalities was independent of any abnormalities of coronary flow reserve.

Gastroesophageal reflux in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries: an uncommon cause of exertional chest pain

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between exertional chest pain and gastroesophageal reflux in patients with normal coronary angiograms and in controls by measuring oesophageal pH during treadmill exercise tests and to compare the results with routine ambulatory monitoring.

DESIGN

Case control study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral cardiac unit.

PATIENTS

50 consecutive patients with chest pain and completely normal coronary angiograms and 16 controls with coronary artery stenoses.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Episodes of acid reflux and chest pain during treadmill exercise; a symptom index expressing the percentage of episodes of pain related to acid reflux during ambulatory monitoring.

RESULTS

Four (8%) patients and two (12%) controls had reflux during treadmill exercise (NS). 32 (64%) and 16 (100%) reported chest pain, but only three (6%) and two (12%) had coincident reflux (NS). Reflux was as frequent before, during, and after treadmill exercise (five (8%) v six (9%) v two (3%)) in the 66 subjects; (NS). 19 (38%) patients and three (19%) controls had abnormal reflux on ambulatory monitoring (NS). Eight (16%) and three (19%) had a symptom index > 50%, but six and two of these reported pain without coincident reflux during treadmill exercise.

CONCLUSION

There are many potential causes of chest pain in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries. Although gastroesophageal reflux is commonly implicated and many patients have a high incidence of spontaneous reflux during ambulatory monitoring, it rarely occurs during exertion and the association with chest pain is poor.

Esophageal dysfunction as a cause of angina pectoris ("linked angina"): does it exist?

PURPOSE

The differentiation between cardiac and esophageal causes of retrosternal chest pain is notoriously difficult. Theoretically, cardiac and esophageal causes may coexist. It has also been reported that gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal motor abnormalities may elicit myocardial ischemia and chest pain, a phenomenon called linked angina pectoris. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of esophageal abnormalities as a cause of retrosternal chest pain in patients with previously documented coronary artery disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients were studied, all of whom had undergone coronary arteriography. The patients were studied after they were admitted to the coronary care unit with an attack of typical chest pain. On electrocardiograms (ECGs) taken during pain, 15 patients (group I) had new signs of ischemia; the other 15 patients (group II) did not. In none of the patients were cardiac enzymes elevated. As soon as possible, but within 2 hours after admission, combined 24-hour recording of esophageal pressure and pH was performed. During chest pain, 12-lead ECG recording was carried out.

RESULTS

In group I, all 15 patients experienced one or more pain episodes during admission, 25 of which were associated with ischemic electrocardiographic changes. The other two episodes were reflux-related. Only one of the 25 ischemia-associated pain episodes was also reflux-related, ie, it was preceded by a reflux episode. In group II, 19 chest pain episodes occurred in 11 patients. None of these was associated with electrocardiographic changes, but 8 were associated with reflux (42%) and 8 with abnormal esophageal motility (42%).

CONCLUSION

Linked angina is a rare phenomenon.

Bursts of non-deglutitive simultaneous contractions may be a normal oesophageal motility pattern

The frequency and characteristics of non-deglutitive motor activity of the human oesophagus and its relation to motility patterns in the antrum and upper small intestine were studied in 25 fasted healthy subjects. Motility of the oesophagus, antrum, and upper small intestine was recorded by means of a manometric perfused catheter system. The most striking non-deglutitive motility pattern consisted of repetitive bursts of non-sequential pressure peaks occurring in the smooth muscle portion of the oesophagus. The mean number of pressure peaks per burst was 2.7 (SD 2) waves with a mean amplitude of 19.5 (SD 9.9) mm Hg and a duration of 3.09 (SD 0.22) seconds. The highest amplitude was 80 mm Hg and the longest burst consisted of 13 repetitive waves. The bursts were recorded up to a distance of 15-20 cm above the lower oesophageal sphincter. Ninety five per cent of the bursts occurred during a 15 minute period before the onset of phase 3 of the migrating motor complex in the antral or upper small intestinal area, or during the lower oesophageal sphincter component of the migrating motor complex. In conclusion, spontaneous bursts of non-sequential pressure peaks occurred in the smooth muscle part of the human oesophagus in relation to phase 3 of the migrating motor complex. They represent the oesophageal body component of phase 3 of the migrating motor complex and are not a sign of oesophageal motor abnormalities.

ST-segment depression during sleep in obstructive sleep apnea

It was hypothesized that obstructive sleep apnea may precipitate myocardial ischemia, reflected by ST-segment depression, in some patients during sleep. Overnight sleep studies and simultaneous 3-channel Holter monitoring were performed on 23 consecutive patients with obstructive sleep apnea without a history of coronary artery disease. Each patient was randomly assigned to nasal continuous positive airway pressure for the first half of the night. An episode of significant ST depression was defined as > 1 mm from baseline for > 1 minute. The total duration (minutes) of ST depression was indexed to the total sleep time (minutes per hour of sleep). Seven patients (30%) had ST depression during sleep. In all 7 patients the duration of ST depression decreased during nasal continuous positive airway pressure (30 +/- 18 vs 11 +/- 13 minutes per hour of sleep) in association with a reduction in the apnea-hypopnea index (65 +/- 35 vs 7 +/- 6/hour), arousal index (49 +/- 14 vs 6 +/- 4/hour) and the duration that oxygen saturation was < 90% (44 +/- 27 vs 12 +/- 23% total sleep time). When patients were not on nasal continuous positive airway pressure, the apnea-hypopnea and arousal indexes were higher during periods of ST depression than when ST segments were isoelectric, whereas oxygen saturation was not different. These 7 patients underwent exercise testing, which was positive for inducible myocardial ischemia in 1 patient. It is concluded that ST depression is relatively common in patients with obstructive apnea during sleep and that the duration of ST depression is significantly reduced by nasal continuous positive airway pressure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clinical application of 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH and pressure monitoring

Recently, 24-h recording of intraesophageal pH and pressure signals in ambulatory subjects has become possible. Several research applications of the technique have emerged, but until now only a few clinical applications have been established, the most important of which is noncardiac chest pain. In the computer analysis of the signals, the patient with noncardiac chest pain is used as his or her own control; motility and pH profiles during pain are compared with asymptomatic base-line values obtained from the same patient. Automated analysis by means of a computer avoids observer bias and saves time. By means of 24-h monitoring, motor abnormalities have been identified as the cause of the chest pain in 4.5% to 18% and reflux in 4.5% to 25% of the patients studied. In addition, patients were identified who have both dysmotility- and reflux-related pain episodes. The yield of 24-h monitoring is highest in patients who have frequent pain episodes. A high yield of 24-h monitoring was found in patients with noncardiac chest pain admitted to a coronary care unit. Seventy-six per cent of these patients were found to have either reflux- of dysmotility-related chest pain. Patients with proven coronary artery disease who do not respond well to adequate treatment frequently have gastroesophageal reflux (39%) or esophageal motor abnormalities (50%) as the cause of their ongoing pain attacks. In these patients, identification of the esophageal cause of the symptoms not only helps the physician to select the optimal treatment but also reduces the patient's need for medical care.