Does the somatostatin analogue octreotide protect against ERCP induced pancreatitis?

Incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 145 randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) largely remain unknown with changing trends in ERCP use, indication, and techniques. We sought to determine the incidence, severity, and mortality of PEP in consecutive and high-risk patients based on a systemic review and meta-analysis of patients in placebo and no-stent arms of randomized control trials (RCTs).

METHODS

The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from the inception of each database to June 2022 to identify full-text RCTs evaluating PEP prophylaxes. The incidence, severity, and mortality of PEP from the placebo or no-stent arms of RCTs were recorded for consecutive and high-risk patients. A random-effects meta-analysis for a proportions model was used to calculate PEP incidence, severity, and mortality.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-five RCTs were found with 19,038 patients in the placebo or no-stent arms. The overall cumulative incidence of PEP was 10.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.3-11.3), predominantly among the academic centers conducting such RCTs. The cumulative incidences of severe PEP and mortality were .5% (95% CI, .3-.7) and .2% (95% CI, .08-.3), respectively, across 91 RCTs with 14,441 patients. The cumulative incidences of PEP and severe PEP were 14.1% (95% CI, 11.5-17.2) and .8% (95% CI, .4-1.6), respectively, with a mortality rate of .2% (95% CI, 0-.3) across 35 RCTs with 3733 patients at high risk of PEP. The overall trend for the incidence of PEP among patients randomized to placebo or no-stent arms of RCTs has remained unchanged from 1977 to 2022 (P = .48).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall incidence of PEP is 10.2% but is 14.1% among high-risk patients based on this systematic review of placebo or no-stent arms of 145 RCTs; this rate has not changed between 1977 and 2022. Severe PEP and mortality from PEP are relatively uncommon.

Antitumoral and Anti-inflammatory Roles of Somatostatin and Its Analogs in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and affects about 8% of cirrhotic patients, with a recurrence rate of over 50%. There are numerous therapies available for the treatment of HCC, depending on cancer staging and condition of the patient. The complexity of the treatment is also justified by the unique pathogenesis of HCC that involves intricate processes such as chronic inflammation, fibrosis, and multiple molecular carcinogenesis events. During the last three decades, multiple in vivo and in vitro experiments have used somatostatin and its analogs (SSAs) to reduce the proliferative and metastatic potential of hepatoma cells by inducing their apoptosis and reducing angiogenesis and the inflammatory component of HCC. Most experiments have proven successful, revealing several different pathways and mechanisms corresponding to the aforementioned functions. Moreover, a correlation between specific effects and expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) was observed in the studied cells. Clinical trials have tested either somatostatin or an analog, alone or in combination with other drugs, to explore the potential effects on HCC patients, in various stages of the disease. While the majority of these clinical trials exhibited minor to moderate success, some other studies were inconclusive or even reported negative outcomes. A complete evaluation of the efficacy of somatostatin and SSAs is still the matter of intense debate, and, if deemed useful, these substances may play a beneficial role in the management of HCC patients.

Preventive and therapeutic significance of octreotide combined with lansoprazole on post-ERCP pancreatitis and its effect on serum amylase, inflammatory factors and immune function

The study aimed to investigate the preventive and therapeutic significance of octreotide combined with lansoprazole on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) and its effects on serum amylase (AMS), inflammatory factors and immune function. A total of 132 patients who underwent ERCP in Shaoxing People's Hospital (Shaoxing, China) were enrolled in the study and allocated into two groups: The study group (octreotide plus lansoprazole, 68 cases) and the control group (octreotide alone, 64 cases). The incidence of PEP and post-ERCP hyperamylasemia (PEH), the concentrations of serum AMS, interleukin-17 (IL-17) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), as well as the T-lymphocyte population in peripheral blood were detected. The AMS levels in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group at 6 and 24 h after treatment (P<0.001). The incidence of PEP and PEH, symptom disappearance time and hospital stay in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group after treatment (P<0.05). The levels of IL-17 and TNF-α in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group after treatment (all P<0.05). The percentage of CD3⁺, CD4⁺, CD8⁺ cells and the ratio of CD4⁺/CD8⁺ in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group after treatment (all P<0.05). The results indicated that octreotide combined with lansoprazole reduces AMS levels and the incidence of PEP, alleviates inflammation and improves the immune function.

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Kidney Transplant Patients: Results From a Single Center

OBJECTIVES

We report the outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures performed for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in patients who had undergone kidney transplant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the records of kidney transplant patients for January 1993 to December 2014. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was carried out using an Olympus JF240 duodenoscope (tip outer diameter 12.6 mm, working channel diameter 3.2 mm). The procedures were performed by Department of Anesthesiology staff while the patients were deeply sedated, given a combination of midazolam plus propofol.

RESULTS

Data from 21 kidney transplant patients (16 men and 5 women; mean age at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography 42.6 ± 23.4 y) were evaluated. A total of 23 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures were performed. The indications were choledocholithiasis in 6 patients (28.6%), common bile duct dilatation plus liver enzyme elevations in 4 patients (19%), liver enzyme elevation alone in 4 (19%), biliary necrotizing pancreatitis in 2 (9.6%), and cholangitis in 5 (23.8%). Hepatobiliary ultrasonography findings showed that 3 patients (14.3%) had absence of gallbladder owing to cholecystectomy, 14 (66.7%) had gallstones, 1 (4.7%) had gallstones with cholecystitis findings, and 3 (14.3%) were normal. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography findings were normal in 4 patients (19%), showed cholangitis in 2 (9.6%), choledocholithiasis in 10 (47.6%), bile duct wall irregularities in 2 (9.6%), dilated common bile duct in 2 (9.6%), and cholangiocarcinoma in 1 (4.7%). Sphincterotomy was performed in 16 patients. None of the patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography developed any complications, for example, acute pancreatitis, bleeding, duodenal, or bile duct perforation.

CONCLUSIONS

In kidney transplant patients, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is safe and able to provide substantial information for managing biliopancreatic diseases.

Incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review by using randomized, controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Data regarding the incidence and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) are primarily from nonrandomized studies.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence, severity, and mortality of PEP from a systematic review of the placebo or no-stent arms of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs).

DESIGN

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify RCTs evaluating the efficacy of drugs and/or pancreatic stents to prevent PEP.

SETTING

Systematic review of patients enrolled in RCTs evaluating agents for PEP prophylaxis.

PATIENTS

Patients in the placebo or no-stent arms of the RCTs

INTERVENTION

ERCP.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Incidence, severity, and mortality of PEP.

RESULTS

There were 108 RCTs with 13,296 patients in the placebo or no-stent arms. Overall, the PEP incidence was 9.7% and the mortality rate was 0.7%. Severity of PEP was reported for 8857 patients: 5.7%, 2.6%, and 0.5% of cases were mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. The incidence of PEP in 2345 high-risk patients was 14.7% and the severity of PEP was mild, moderate, and severe in 8.6%, 3.9%, and 0.8%, respectively, with a 0.2% mortality rate. The incidence of PEP was 13% in North American RCTs compared with 8.4% in European and 9.9% in Asian RCTs. ERCPs conducted before and after 2000 had a PEP incidence of 7.7% and 10%, respectively.

LIMITATIONS

Difference in PEP risk among patients in the included RCTs.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of PEP and severe PEP is similar in high-risk patients and the overall cohort. Discrepancies in the incidence of PEP across geographic regions require further study.

Effectiveness and tolerability of NSAIDs in the prophylaxis of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis is a common complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The beneficial effects of pharmaco-logic treatment of acute pancreatitis are unclear. Although the prophylactic use of NSAIDs for the reduction of the risk for pancreatic injury after ERCP has been assessed, the beneficial effects of NSAIDs on pancreatic injury are still being debated.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness and tolerability of NSAIDs in the prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP).

METHODS

MEDLINE (January 1966-January 2009), EMBASE (January 1966-January 2009), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 1, 2009) were searched using the key terms: pancreatitis, post-ERCP pancreatitis, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, indomethacin, and diclofenac. The methods recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration and the Quality of Reporting Meta-Analyses guideline were used to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of NSAIDs in the prevention of PEP.

RESULTS

Four multinational RCTs were included in the meta-analysis (969 patients). The pooled odds ratio for NSAIDs for mild PEP was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.40-1.17; P = NS); moderate to severe PEP, 0.22 (95% CI, 0.05-1.01; P = 0.05); PEP (pooled), 0.44 (95% CI, 0.21-0.93; P = 0.03); in high-risk patients, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.17-1.39; P = NS); and in low-risk patients, 0.29 (95% CI, 0.12-0.71; P = 0.006). No evidence of publication bias was found.

CONCLUSION

Based on the findings from the present systematic review of 4 RCTs, NSAIDs were effective and well tolerated in the prevention of PEP, especially in low-risk patients.

Gabexate mesylate in the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis update

BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis is a common complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and the benefit of pharmacologic treatment of the condition is unclear. Although prophylactic use of gabexate mesylate (GM) for the reduction of pancreatic injury after ERCP has been evaluated, uncertainty remains regarding the effectiveness of GM treatment in post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine through systematic review and meta-analysis the effectiveness and tolerability of GM in the prophylaxis of PEP.

METHODS

MEDLINE (January 1966-July 2007), EMBASE (January 1966- July 2007), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register on The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2007), and the China Biological Medicine Database (January 1978-July 2007) were searched. We used the method recommended by The Cochrane Collaboration to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of GM in the prevention of PEP.

RESULTS

Of the 38 studies identified, 31 were excluded for the following reasons: they were reviews or editorials (9 articles); were meta-analyses (4); had differences in cointerventions (4); were nonrandomized controlled trials or had incorrect randomization (4); were repeat publications (2); lacked a placebo group (1); or other (7). Seven RCTs, totaling 2883 patients, conducted in a variety of languages were included in the meta-analysis. When the RCTs were analyzed, odds ratios for GM were 0.65 (95% CI, 0.36-1.18; P 0.16) for PER 1.90 (95% CI, 0.54-6.65; P 0.32) for severe PEP, 0.55 (95% CI, 0.17-1.77; P 0.32) for the case-fatality ratio of PEP, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.74-1.05; P 0.16) for post-ERCP hyperamylasemia, and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.49 1.25; P 0.30) for post-ERCP abdominal pain. No evidence of publication bias was found.

CONCLUSIONS

No beneficial effects of GM on acute pancreatitis, the PEP mortality rate, or post-ERCP abdominal pain or hyperamylasemia were found; therefore, GM cannot be recommended for the prophylaxis of PEP.

Intravenous synthetic secretin reduces the incidence of pancreatitis induced by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate whether synthetic secretin is effective in reducing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis.

METHODS

This is a single academic medical center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial using secretin (dose of 16 μg) administered intravenously immediately before ERCP. Patients were evaluated for the primary outcome of post-ERCP pancreatitis as diagnosed by a single investigator.

RESULTS

A total of 1100 patients were screened, of whom 869 were randomly assigned to receive secretin (n = 426) or placebo (n = 443) before ERCP and were evaluated after the procedure for efficacy of secretin. The incidence of pancreatitis in the secretin group compared with the placebo group was 36 (8.7%) of 413 patients versus 65 (15.1%) of 431 patients, respectively, P = 0.004. In the subgroup analysis, secretin was highly protective against post-ERCP pancreatitis for patients undergoing biliary sphincterotomy (6/129 vs 32/142, P < 0.001), patients undergoing cannulation of the common bile duct (26/339 vs 56/342, P < 0.001), and patients not undergoing pancreatic sphincterotomy (26/388 vs 57/403, P = 0.001). Analysis of the interaction between these groups reveals that the primary effect of secretin prophylaxis was prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients undergoing biliary sphincterotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Synthetic secretin reduces the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis, particularly in patients in undergoing biliary sphincterotomy.

Meta-analysis: octreotide prevents post-ERCP pancreatitis, but only at sufficient doses

BACKGROUND

Effects of octreotide on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis have been studied in many clinical trials. These trials have yielded inconclusive results. Results of more recent studies using larger doses, however, seem to be more optimistic.

AIM

To examine effects of octreotide at different doses on PEP.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of relevant databases, including Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Library and Science Citation Index yielded 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Trials were divided into two groups according to the total dosage of octreotide: <0.5 mg (OCT1), > or =0.5 mg (OCT2). The rate of PEP was analysed using a fixed effect model.

RESULTS

At doses of > or =0.5 mg, octreotide reduced the rate of PEP. In the OCT2 group, analysis revealed a statistically significant difference on PEP between the octreotide group and the controls (3.4% vs. 7.5%, pooled OR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.28-0.73; P = 0.001, NNT = 25). In the OCT1 group, the rate of PEP was similar between patients receiving octreotide and the controls (7.2% vs. 6.0%, pooled OR = 1.23; 95% CI: 0.80-1.91; P = 0.35).

CONCLUSION

Octreotide is effective in preventing PEP, but only at sufficient doses (> or =0.5 mg).

Exocrine pancreatic involvement in critically ill patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To learn about the prevalence, pathophysiology, and treatment of exocrine pancreatic involvement in critically ill patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Elevations in the levels of pancreatic enzymes are observed in up to 80% of intensive care patients. Most of these patients do not develop clinically relevant pancreatitis. However, elevations in enzyme levels do represent pancreatic damage with a risk of complications. Different factors have been discussed, which may contribute to pancreatic damage in critically ill patients. These include splanchnic hypoperfusion during shock or major surgery, bacterial translocation, elevated triglyceride levels, development of biliary sluge, and biliary pancreatitis, as well as several drugs. Imaging procedures and inflammatory markers help to identify relevant disease. Several therapeutic options have been discussed recently with a focus on early enteral nutrition.

SUMMARY

Pancreatic damage is frequently observed in critically ill patients. Although in most of these patients, this is without major clinical consequences, some patients develop relevant pancreatitis, which contributes to morbidity and mortality. Risk factors have been identified and therapeutic strategies have been changed.

Can wire-guided cannulation prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Among the procedure-related factors associated with post-ERCP pancreatitis, selective cannulation of the common bile duct by insertion of a guidewire may be associated with fewer complications than conventional methods of cannulation with contrast injection to access the bile duct. However, the results of studies regarding the usefulness of wire-guided cannulation (WGC) are conflicting.

OBJECTIVE

This prospective randomized trial was designed to determine whether WGC reduces the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

DESIGN

A prospective randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Tertiary-care academic medical center.

PATIENTS

A total of 300 consecutive patients with native papilla and pancreaticobiliary disease who were candidates for therapeutic ERCP were randomized from June 2006 to May 2007.

INTERVENTIONS

WGC without contrast injection or conventional cannulation with contrast injection.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Post-ERCP pancreatitis, risk factors, and procedure-related complications were evaluated prospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 3 patients (2%) in the WGC group and 17 patients (11.3%) in the conventional group had post-ERCP pancreatitis (P = .001). Among the cases of acute pancreatitis in the WGC group, 2 patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) and unintentional main pancreatic duct (PD) guidewire cannulation showed post-ERCP pancreatitis despite the use of WGC. In multivariate analysis, WGC was a protective factor (odds ratio 0.1; 95% CI, 0.024-0.490, P = .004), whereas female sex and SOD were risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis.

LIMITATION

Our study population was a low-risk cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

WGC is associated with a lower rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis. However, WGC may not prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with suspected SOD and unintentional PD guidewire cannulation.

Evaluation of recombinant platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase for reducing the incidence and severity of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Pancreatitis is the most common major complication of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP. Platelet-activating factor (PAF) has been implicated in the pathophysiologic events associated with acute pancreatitis. Animal and human studies suggested that recombinant PAF acetylhydrolase (rPAF-AH) might ameliorate the severity of acute pancreatitis.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to determine whether prophylactic rPAF-AH administration reduces the frequency or severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk patients.

DESIGN

Randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received rPAF-AH at a dose of either 1 or 5 mg/kg or placebo. Patients were administered a single intravenous infusion over 10 minutes of study drug or placebo <1 hour before ERCP.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Standardized criteria were used to diagnose and grade the severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Adverse events were prospectively recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 600 patients were enrolled. There were no statistically significant differences among the treatment groups with respect to patient demographics, ERCP indications, and patient and procedure risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis with the following exceptions: the rPAF-AH 5 mg/kg group had significantly fewer patients younger than 40 years old and scheduled to undergo a therapeutic ERCP involving the pancreatic sphincter or duct. Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 17.5%, 15.9%, and 19.6% of patients receiving rPAF-AH (1 mg/kg), rPAF-AH (5 mg/kg), and placebo, respectively (P = .59 for rPAF-AH 1 mg/kg vs placebo and P = .337 for rPAF-AH 5 mg/kg vs placebo). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to the severity of pancreatitis, frequency of amylase/lipase elevation more than 3 times normal, or abdominal pain.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no apparent benefit of rPAF-AH treatment compared with placebo in reducing the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis in subjects at increased risk.

Prophylactic octreotide administration does not prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

There is no consensus whether octreotide can prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis. We performed a meta-analysis comparing octreotide with placebo in randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

: Electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane controlled trials register, the Cochrane Library, and the Science Citation Index updated to January 2007, were searched to retrieve relevant randomized controlled trials. Outcome measures were post-ERCP pancreatitis.

RESULTS

: Fifteen trials were identified, and statistical homogeneity was present among these selected trials. After all the trials were pooled, post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 7.0% of controls (92 of 1320) versus 5.5% of treated patients (72 of 1301), without statistical significance (odds ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-1.08). Subsequent sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses also produced no significant effect. Only in large-scale trials (>200 cases) that octreotide could statistically, significantly prevent pancreatitis (odds ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

: On the basis of current best evidence, octreotide cannot prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Meta-analysis of prophylactic allopurinol use in post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of allopurinol in the prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis.

METHODS

: We used the method recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of allopurinol in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), including 6 RCTs conducted all over the world.

RESULTS

: Six RCTs totaling 1554 patients undergoing ERCP were included. When the RCTs were analyzed, odds ratios of allopurinol were 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-1.48; P = 0.40) for PEP, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.33-2.28; P = 0.78) for severe PEP, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.37-2.11; P = 0.78) for post-ERCP hyperamylasemia, and 0.19 (95% CI, 0.01-3.91; P = 0.28) for case-fatality ratio of PEP, thus indicating no beneficial effects of allopurinol on acute pancreatitis, PEP death rate, and hyperamylasemia. No evidence of publication bias was found.

CONCLUSIONS

: Allopurinol cannot prevent the pancreatic injury after ERCP. Allopurinol is not recommended in the prophylaxis of PEP.

Meta-analysis of prophylactic corticosteroid use in post-ERCP pancreatitis

Background

Acute pancreatitis is a common complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and benefit of pharmacological treatment is unclear. Although prophylactic use of corticosteroid for reduction of pancreatic injury after ERCP has been evaluated, discrepancy about beneficial effect of corticosteroid on pancreatic injury still exists. The aim of current study is to evaluate effectiveness and safety of corticosteroid in prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP).

Methods

We employed the method recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration to perform a meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of corticosteroid in prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) around the world.

Results

Most of the seven RCTs were of high quality. When the RCTs were analyzed, odds ratios (OR) for corticosteroid were 1.13 [95% CI (0.89~1.44), p = 0.32] for PEP, 1.61 [95% CI (0.74~3.52), p = 0.23] for severe PEP, 0.92 [95% CI (0.57~1.48), p = 0.73] for post-ERCP hyperamylasemia respectively. The results indicated that there were no beneficial effects of corticosteroid on acute pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia. No evidence of publication bias was found.

Conclusion

Corticosteroids cannot prevent pancreatic injury after ERCP. Therefore, their use in the prophylaxis of PEP is not recommended.

Octreotide prevents L-asparaginase-induced pancreatic injury in rats

OBJECTIVE

L-asparaginase (ASNase) is one of the most effective chemotherapeutic means for inducing remission in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. However, because of unknown risk factors, severe pancreatitis sometimes occurs in patients receiving ASNase. We assessed the effect of ASNase on pancreatic acinar cells and then investigated the preventive effects of octreotide against ASNase-induced pancreatic injury in rats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rats received intraperitoneal injections of an Escherichia coli ASNase solution (200, 500, or 1000 IU/kg) or normal saline as a control every 24 hours for 5 days. Octreotide (3 microg/kg) was injected subcutaneously with ASNase (1000 IU/kg) every 8 hours for 5 days. Rats were sacrificed 24 hours after the last injection of ASNase or normal saline.

RESULTS

Only the rats given 1000 IU/kg ASNase had significantly increased levels of pancreatic amylase (1962 +/- 152 vs 2179 +/- 84 IU/L, p < 0.01), trypsin (27.3 +/- 3.6 vs 41.1 +/- 22.8 IU/L, p < 0.05), and pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor (0.03 +/- 0.09 vs 0.27 +/- 0.10 ng/mL, p < 0.01) as compared to the control group. In addition, the acinar cells showed histological damage; however, octreotide injection provided protection against histological damage and the pancreatic enzymes remained within normal limits.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ASNase by itself did not cause pancreatitis, it did cause increased levels of pancreatic enzymes and histological damage to the pancreas associated with pancreatic injury or pre-pancreatitis. Prior treatment with octreotide prevented the development of ASNase-induced pancreatic injury.

Pancreatic sphincterotomy: Technique, indications, and complications

Pancreatic sphincterotomy serves as the cornerstone of endoscopic therapy of the pancreas. Historically, its indications have been less well-defined than those of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy, yet it plays a definite and useful role in diseases such as chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic-type sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. In the appropriate setting, it may be used as a single therapeutic maneuver, or in conjunction with other endoscopic techniques such as pancreatic stone extraction or stent placement. The current standard of practice utilizes two different methods of performing pancreatic sphincterotomy: a pull-type sphincterotome technique without prior stent placement, and a needle-knife sphincterotome technique over an existing stent. The complications associated with pancreatic sphincterotomy are many, although acute pancreatitis appears to be the most common and the most serious of the early complications. As such, it continues to be reserved for those endoscopists who perform a relatively high-volume of therapeutic pancreaticobiliary endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography.

Mild ERCP-induced and non-ERCP-related acute pancreatitis: two distinct clinical entities?

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the hypothesis that mild endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-induced acute pancreatitis (AP) runs a distinctly shorter clinical course compared with mild attacks caused by other etiological factors.

METHODS

ERCP-induced AP was defined as the persistence of postprocedure abdominal pain requiring analgesia for at least 24 h in association with hyperamylasemia of more than three times the normal value. Among 2552 patients who had undergone ERCP between 1996 and 2002 in two different hospitals, mild AP developed after "elective" ERCP in 48 (group I). Among a random sample of 10% of 700 patients admitted with AP to both hospitals during the same study period, 58 had mild non-ERCP-related AP (group II). Results shown are medians.

RESULTS

Patients in group I had significantly shorter durations of pain (55 vs. 114 h, P < 0.0001), analgesic intake (56 vs.93 h, P = 0.007), and intravenous hydration (48 vs. 80 h, P < 0.0001), a lower opiate analgesic requirement (58 mg morphine equivalent vs. 100 mg, P = 0.001), a shorter time to resumption of oral diet (3 vs. 5 days, P < 0.0001), and a shorter hospital stay (4 vs. 7 days, P < 0.0001) than patients in group II.

CONCLUSIONS

The current definitions of ERCP-induced AP select a cohort of patients whose mild attacks run a significantly shorter and milder course than non-ERCP-related mild attacks. A new consensus definition of ERCP-induced AP that describes attacks of similar clinical course is needed.

Pharmacotherapy for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis

Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is a potential complication of ERCP. Pharmacotherapy for prevention of PEP aims at reducing basal sphincter pressure and contractility or a decrease in pancreatic secretion to reduce intraductal pressure. Timing and route of administration of drugs are critical to ensure maximum benefits from medications. Pancreatic stenting offers an alternative to decompress the pancreas and is effective in reducing PEP in high-risk patients.

Effect of octreotide administration in the prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia: A multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

Since the introduction of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatology (ERCP) in clinical use, pancreatitis has become a common complication of ERCP. Octreotide is an inhibitor of pancreatic enzyme secretions. Several studies have evaluated the effect of octreotide on the incidence of clinical pancreatitis after ERCP, but with different results. The aim was to determine the efficacy of prophylactic administration of octreotide for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) and hyperamylasemia.

METHODS

In this study, patients with scheduled ERCP were randomized to receive either octreotide (0.3 mg) via intramuscular injection or a placebo. The study was conducted in 12 digestive endoscopic units in China. Patients were randomized into two groups: an octreotide group (N = 414) and a control group (N = 418). In the octreotide group, octreotide (0.3 mg) was dissolved in 500 mL of 0.9% saline solution and administered by continuous intravenous infusion, beginning 1 h before endoscopic examination and continued for 6 h thereafter; 0.1 mg of octreotide was injected subcutaneously at 6 and 12 h after the intravenous injection was stopped. The control group was given a placebo intravenously. The end point was the development of acute pancreatitis.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of acute pancreatitis was 3.85%; this included 2.42% (10/414) in the octreotide group and 5.26% (22/418) in the control group (P = 0.046). The overall incidence of hyperamylasemia was 14.9%; 12.32% (51/414) in the octreotide group and 17.46% (73/418) in the control group (P = 0.041). No side effects were found.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that octreotide can prevent PEP and hyperamylasemia.

Minimizing complications in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a major tool in the diagnosis and management of numerous biliary and pancreatic conditions, including choledocholithiasis as well as benign and malignant pancreatic diseases, especially those causing biliary obstruction. Since the procedure's inception, the techniques and indications have evolved along with advances in technology and an improved understanding of risks associated with ERCP. The trend has been away from purely diagnostic procedures; most ERCPs are now therapeutic in intent. ERCP remains among the more invasive of endoscopic procedures, with significant rates of complications that can be major. As advances are made in less invasive technology, it is important to understand the complications of ERCP and how best to avoid them.

Twenty-four hour prophylaxis with increased dosage of octreotide reduces the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis is a common complication of ERCP, occurring in up to 10% of cases. Chemoprevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis remains a debated issue.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated whether increased dosage of octreotide, a potent inhibitor of pancreatic secretion, could reduce the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

DESIGN

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial, the effect of 500 microg octreotide, given 3 times daily subcutaneously starting 24 hours before the ERCP procedure, was compared with that of placebo in patients who underwent diagnostic and/or therapeutic ERCP.

PATIENTS

A total of 202 patients were included in the trial. The 2 groups were similar in regards to age, sex, indications for treatment, underlying diseases, and types of therapeutic procedures. Patients were clinically evaluated, and serum amylase levels were determined before ERCP and at 6 to 8 hours thereafter. Standardized criteria were used to diagnose and to grade the severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

RESULTS

The medication was discontinued because of an allergic reaction in 1 patient in the octreotide group. The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis was significantly lower in the octreotide group compared with the placebo group (2/10 [2%] vs 9/101 [8.9%], P = .03). All cases of acute pancreatitis were mild, except 2 (1 moderate and 1 severe) in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this trial support the use of 24-hour prophylaxis with high dose of octreotide in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

N-acetylcysteine does not prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography hyperamylasemia and acute pancreatitis

AIM: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is the most common and often severe complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The early step in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis is probably the capillary endothelial injury mediated by oxygen-derived free radicals. N-acetylcysteine - a free radical scavenger may be potentially effective in preventing post-ERCP acute pancreatitis and it is also known that N-acetylcysteine (ACC) can reduce the severity of disease in experimental model of AP.

METHODS: One hundred and six patients were randomly allocated to two groups. Fifty-five patients were given N-acetylcysteine (two 600 mg doses orally 24 and 12 h before ERCP and 600 mg was given iv, twice a day for two days after the ERCP). The control group consisted of 51 patients who were given iv. isotonic saline twice a day for two days after the ERCP. Serum and urine amylase activities were measured before ERCP and 8 and 24 h after the procedure. The primary outcome parameter was post-ERCP acute pancreatitis and the secondary outcome parameters were differences between groups in serum and urine amylase activity.

RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis between two groups (10 patients overall, 4 in the ACC group and 6 in the control group). There were also no significant differences in baseline and post-ERCP serum and urine amylase activity between ACC group and control group.

CONCLUSION: N-acetylcysteine fails to demonstrate any significant preventive effect on post-ERCP pancreatitis, as well as on serum and urine amylase activity.

Effect of native somatostatin on Sphincter of Oddi motility in patients with acute recurrent pancreatitis. A pilot study with Ultrasound-Secretin test

BACKGROUND

The effect of native somatostatin on Sphincter of Oddi motility still remains controversial. Sphincter of Oddi inhibition was demonstrated at manometry in patients in the acute phase of alcoholic pancreatitis. Other investigators showed marked somatostatin-induced impairment of bile flow by hepato-biliary scintigraphy.

AIM

Aim of the study was to determine the effects of therapeutical doses of exogenous somatostatin on Sphincter of Oddi motility.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied eight patients (two men, six women, age 18-42), in the quiescent phase of idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis. We directly studied Sphincter of Oddi motility by perendoscopic manometry and, indirectly, secretin-stimulated pancreatic juice outflow by Ultrasound-Secretin test. The two tests were repeated before and after somatostatin infusion.

RESULTS

Manometry was performed in two patients. After 250 microg somatostatin bolus the sphincter showed an increase of motor activity. At Ultrasound-Secretin test mean diameters were significantly larger at 40-60 min evaluation intervals during 250 microg/h somatostatin infusion as compared to saline infusion, showing a delayed pancreatic duct emptying.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute administration of somatostatin seems to induce an excitatory effect on Sphincter of Oddi motility, with impaired pancreatic outflow in patients in the quiescent phase of recurrent pancreatitis.

High-dose allopurinol for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Pancreatitis is the most common major complication of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP. Allopurinol, a xanthine oxidase inhibitor that blocks generation of oxygen-derived free radicals, potentially may prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. This study assessed the efficacy of high-dose oral allopurinol for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

METHODS

A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 250 patients undergoing ERCP. Patients were randomized to receive allopurinol (600 mg) or placebo orally at 15 and 3 hours before the procedure. Patients were clinically evaluated, and serum amylase levels were determined before ERCP and at 6 and 24 hours thereafter. Standardized criteria were used to diagnose and to grade the severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

RESULTS

A total of 243 patients were included in the analysis. The two groups were similar with regard to age; gender; underlying disease; indication for treatment; ERCP findings; and type of treatment, except for biliary sphincterotomy. Only 43 patients in the allopurinol group underwent biliary sphincterotomy vs. 87 in the placebo group ( p < 0.001). The frequency of acute pancreatitis was significantly lower in the allopurinol vs. the placebo group in the final multinomial regression analysis: allopurinol group, 4/125 (3.2%), with all 4 cases graded as mild, vs. placebo group, 21/118 (17.8%), of which 8/118 (6.8%) were graded as mild, 11/118 (9.3%) as moderate, and 2/118 (1.6%) as severe with fatal outcome ( p < 0.001). The protective effect of allopurinol was also apparent in the diagnostic ERCP and the biliary sphincterotomy subgroups when the frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis was analyzed after stratification by procedure. The mean duration of hospitalization for pancreatitis was significantly shorter in the allopurinol compared with the placebo group (2.5 vs. 5.67 days; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment with high-dose, orally administered allopurinol decreases the frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Despite the promising results of this prospective, randomized trial, further studies are needed to verify these observations before allopurinol can be recommended for routine clinical use.

Normal sphincter of oddi motor function

With the introduction of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) manometry, the characteristics of sphincter of Oddi (SO) motor activity have been described. SO manometry is the only available method to measure SO motor activity directly and is usually performed at the time of ERCP. SO manometry is considered to be the gold standard for evaluating patients for sphincter dysfunction. This review reports the technique of SO manometry and normal values for SO manometry. SO motility is characterized by prominent phasic contractions superimposed on a tonic pressure. Elevated basal SO pressure is the most consistent and reliable criteria to diagnose SO dysfunction. Basal pressures obtained from the biliary sphincter are similar to the basal pressure obtained from the pancreatic sphincter. Abnormal SO manometric values are shown. Factors that influence SO pressures, and interpretation of SO manometric tracing are discussed. The most common and serious complication of SO manometry is post-manometry pancreatitis. In healthy volunteers with normal sphincter function, pancreatitis is almost never seen. However, in patients with SO dysfunction, the incidence of pancreatitis is high. The use of new nonperfused microtransducers may reduce this complication.

A simple way of avoiding post-ERCP pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Pancreatitis occurs in up to 30% of patients who undergo ERCP. This study tested the hypothesis that post-ERCP pancreatitis can be avoided by initially accessing the bile duct with a soft-tipped Teflon tracer 0.035-inch guidewire.

METHODS

A single endoscopist performed ERCP in 400 consecutive patients with pancreatobiliary disease who were randomized to two groups. In Group A (200 patients), the bile duct was first accessed by insertion of a soft-tipped Teflon tracer (diameter 0.035 inch) guidewire through a 6F, double channel sphincterotome, followed by cannulation, injection of contrast, and sphincterotomy. In Group B (200 patients), the bile duct was opacified by using traditional methods of cannulation.

RESULTS

No case of acute pancreatitis was detected in Group A, whereas, 8 cases were observed in Group B (6 mild, one moderate, one severe) (p < 0.01). In 9 patients in Group A vs. 39 in Group B (p < 0.001), the serum amylase rose to more than 5 times the upper normal limit during the 24 hours after the procedure. There was no procedure-related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Accessing the bile duct with a soft-tipped tracer guidewire prevents post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Intravenous bolus somatostatin after diagnostic cholangiopancreatography reduces the incidence of pancreatitis associated with therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Previous studies suggested that somatostatin given before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) may reduce the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis. However, the routine use of somatostatin in all patients undergoing ERCP is not likely to be cost effective. This study evaluated whether intravenous bolus somatostatin given after diagnostic cholangiopancreatography could reduce the incidence of pancreatitis in a group of patients undergoing therapeutic ERCP procedures.

METHODS

In a randomised, double blind, controlled trial, the effect of intravenous bolus somatostatin 250 microg given immediately after diagnostic cholangiopancreatography was compared with that of placebo in patients who required endoscopic sphincterotomy or other therapeutic procedures. The primary end point was the incidence of post-ERCP clinical pancreatitis, and a secondary end point was the incidence of hyperamylasemia.

RESULTS

A total of 270 patients were randomised. The somatostatin group (n=135) and the placebo group (n=135) were comparable in age, sex, indications for treatment, and types of procedure. The frequencies of clinical pancreatitis (4.4% v 13.3%; p=0.010) and hyperamylasemia (26.0% v 38.5%; p=0.036) were both significantly lower in the somatostatin group compared with the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

A single dose of intravenous bolus somatostatin, given immediately after diagnostic cholangiopancreatography, is effective in reducing the incidence of pancreatitis after therapeutic ERCP. This novel approach of administering prophylactic somatostatin may offer a cost effective prophylaxis for post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Nifedipine for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, double-blind randomized study

BACKGROUND

Pancreatitis is the most common complication of ERCP. Calcium channel inhibitors have been shown to prevent the development of experimental pancreatitis. The aim of this randomized, placebo-controlled trial was to determine whether the calcium channel blocker nifedipine prevents post-ERCP pancreatitis.

METHODS

Patients referred for ERCP were enrolled. Those being treated with a calcium channel inhibitor and those with acute or chronic pancreatitis were excluded. Nifedipine or placebo was administered orally less than 3 hours before and within 6 hours after ERCP. The main outcome measure was the number of cases of post-ERCP pancreatitis; a secondary outcome was the rate of post-ERCP pain (without pancreatitis) that persisted for 12 or more hours.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-five patients (70 women, 85 men; mean [SD] age 65.8 [18.2] years; range, 23-97 years) were enrolled and randomized to receive nifedipine (76 patients) or placebo (79 patients). The two groups were comparable. Procedures performed were retrograde diagnostic cholangiopancreatography alone (n = 33), biliary sphincterotomy (n = 31), stone extraction (n = 39), stent placement (n = 37), sphincteroplasty (n = 5), and other (n = 3). ERCP was unsuccessful in 5 patients. A single case of severe pancreatitis was observed (placebo group). The rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis was not different between groups (nifedipine, 10 patients, 13.2%; placebo, 14 patients, 17.7%; p = 0.4). The frequency of post-ERCP pain was not different between the groups. The only independent predictor of post-ERCP pancreatitis was difficult cannulation in both groups (OR = 3.78: 95% CI [1.25, 11.45]).

CONCLUSION

This study failed to demonstrate a significant effect of nifedipine in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. A multicenter trial with greater statistical power would be needed to demonstrate a benefit for this drug.

ERCP and MRCP--when and why

Since the introduction of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the 1970s, gastroenterologists have a wide spectrum of diagnostic and therapeutic options in the biliopancreatic ductal system at their disposal. With its arrival in the 1990s, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) developed as a potent diagnostic tool in biliopancreatic pathology. Currently, MRCP is widely replacing diagnostic ERCP and thereby avoiding complications related to endoscopic technique.We summarize evidence-based data and demonstrate indications and differential indications for MRCP and ERCP in pancreatic disease. Complications related to the procedures and possible medical prevention are discussed. The feasibility of interventional endoscopy in pancreatic disease is reported in detail. The role of gastroenterologists in performing MRCP is outlined on the basis of practical examples.

Effects of gabexate mesilate, a protease inhibitor, on human sphincter of Oddi motility

Gabexate mesilate is an antiprotease drug, which reduced the severity of pancreatitis and frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis. In dogs gabexate inhibits sphincter of Oddi motility but no data are available in humans. The aim of this study was to verify by manometry the action of gabexate on human sphincter of Oddi motility. We enrolled 12 patients with idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis (eight males, five females, mean age 46 +/- 8 years). Standard preendoscopic sphincter of Oddi manometry was done in basal conditions and during infusion of gabexate 20 mg/min: basal pressure, amplitude and frequency of phasic contractions, and motility index (amplitude per frequency) were calculated before and after gabexate injection. Statistical analysis was performed by using Wilcoxon rank test for paired data. Six patients had a manometric diagnosis of stenosis (basal pressure greater than 40 mm Hg); six had normal findings. Phasic activity was not evaluable in five patients with stenosis. Basal pressure was unaffected by drug infusion, while gabexate caused a significant reduction of phasic activity, both in terms of frequency (4.5 +/- 1 vs 3.6 +/- 1; P < 0.05) and amplitude (157.4 +/- 44 vs 80.0 +/- 32; P < 0.05) of contractions. Motility index was reduced on average by 49%. In conclusion, this pilot study confirms, in patients with acute recurrent pancreatitis, the inhibitory action of gabexate on sphincter of Oddi motility already described in dogs. This action needs to be revaluated at therapeutic dosages. On the other hand, prophylactic use of the drug should be avoided during sphincter of Oddi manometry, in order to avoid false negative results.

Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: can heparin prevent acute pancreatitis after ERCP?

BACKGROUND

An exploratory analysis of a prospective study of risk factors for acute pancreatitis after ERCP combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy showed that the frequency of acute pancreatitis was lower in patients who received heparin compared with patients not treated with heparin. The study was continued to further analyze the effect of heparin on the frequency of acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

Potential risk factors for acute pancreatitis and outcomes were evaluated prospectively for all ERCP procedures with endoscopic sphincterotomy performed between September 1994 and December 1998. The results were analyzed by univariate and multivariate methods to determine risk factors for complications. Heparin was administered to 32.9% of the patients (heparin group [HEP group], n = 268) for various clinical reasons (low-molecular-weight heparin, n = 208, unfractionated heparin n = 60). A group of 547 patients who did not receive heparin served as control patients (CON group).

RESULTS

Eight hundred fifteen patients underwent ERCP with endoscopic sphincterotomy; acute pancreatitis occurred in 6.4% (n = 52). The frequency of acute pancreatitis was significantly lower in the HEP group versus the CON group in the final multivariate model, which included significant risk factors for acute pancreatitis (HEP group: 3.4%, 9/268 vs. CON group: 7.9%, 43/547; p = 0.005). HEP did not increase the risk of hemorrhage (HEP group: 1.1%, 3/268, 2 severe, none fatal vs. CON group: 2.0%, 11/547, 3 severe, 2 fatal). HEP (p = 0.005; OR 0.3: 95% CI [0.16, 0.73]) and the number of risk factors present (p = 0.0001; OR 2.5: 95% CI [1.80, 3.50]) influenced the frequency of acute pancreatitis independently.

CONCLUSIONS

Heparin was significantly associated with an extremely low frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis without increasing the risk of hemorrhage after endoscopic sphincterotomy. Because this effect could not be attributed to other known or suspected confounders, our conclusion was that heparin administration before ERCP reduces the risk of pancreatitis.

Octreotide versus hydrocortisone versus placebo in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Octreotide is a potent inhibitor of pancreatic secretion, and corticosteroids suppress humoral and cellular activity. Both agents may reduce the frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of octreotide and hydrocortisone in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis.

METHODS

Three hundred fifty-four patients were entered in to a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 100 microg subcutaneous octreotide (Group 1) versus 100 mg intravenous hydrocortisone (Group 2) versus normal saline solution as placebo (Group 3). All medications were administered approximately 30 minutes before the procedure. Patients were assessed clinically and serum amylase was also measured before the procedure and 3, 12, and 24 hours after the procedure.

RESULTS

Three hundred forty patients were included in the analysis. Pancreatitis was observed in 11 of 112 patients (9.8%) in Group 1, 8 of 113 (7.1%) patients in Group 2, and in 15 of 115 (13.0%) patients in Group 3 (p = 0.32). The mean length of hospitalization in days was similar in all 3 groups: mean (SD) for Groups 1, 2, and 3 were, respectively, 3.6 (1.6) versus 2.9 (0.6) versus 4.3 (1.8) (p = 0.13). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that number of pancreatic injections, suspicion of sphincter dysfunction, therapeutic procedure, and age were risk factors for pancreatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this trial indicate that octreotide and hydrocortisone do not prevent ERCP-induced pancreatitis.

Effect of somatostatin on the sphincter of Oddi in patients with acute non-biliary pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin has been used to prevent pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography but its effect on acute non-biliary pancreatitis is still unclear.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the function of the sphincter of Oddi (SO) and the effect of somatostatin on patients with non-biliary pancreatitis.

METHODS

Twenty patients (18 males, two females) with acute pancreatitis (alcoholic 18, idiopathic two) received SO manometry within one week after admission. After baseline measurement, a bolus dose of somatostatin (Stilamin, Serono) 250 microg was infused slowly, and SO manometry was repeated after five minutes. Continuous infusion of somatostatin 250 microg/h was given for 12 hours after SO manometry. Serum amylase, lipase, glucose, and C reactive protein (CRP) levels were examined before and after somatostatin infusion.

RESULTS

SO manometry was unsuccessful in six patients due to contracted sphincter. In the remaining 14 patients, high SO basal pressure (SOBP >40 mm Hg) was found in seven patients. After somatostatin infusion, mean SOBP decreased from 48.8 (29) to 31.9 (22) mm Hg (p<0.01). One patient had a paradoxical reaction to somatostatin (SOBP increased from 30 to 50 mm Hg) while the other 13 patients had a fall in SOBP after somatostatin. One patient developed abdominal pain with a serum amylase level of 2516 IU/l after SO manometry. No other side effects or changes in amylase, lipase, glucose, or CRP levels were observed in the other 19 patients after SO manometry and somatostatin infusion.

DISCUSSION

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction is common in patients with acute non-biliary pancreatitis and in most cases somatostatin can relax the sphincter.

Post-ERCP pancreatitis: reduction by routine antibiotics

Cholangitis and pancreatitis are severe complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Antibiotics have been considered important in preventing cholangitis, especially in those with jaundice. Some have suggested that bacteria may play a role in the induction of post-ERCP pancreatitis. It is not clear, however, whether the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis could be reduced by antibiotic prophylaxis, as is the case with septic complications. In this prospective study, a total of 321 consecutive patients were randomized to the following two groups: (1) a prophylaxis group (n = 161) that was given 2 g of cephtazidime intravenously 30 minutes before ERCP, and (2) a control group (n = 160) that received no antibiotics. All patients admitted to the hospital for ERCP who had not taken any antibiotics during the preceding week were included. Patients who were allergic to cephalosporins, patients with immune deficiency or any other condition requiring antibiotic prophylaxis, patients with clinical jaundice, and pregnant patients were excluded. In the final analysis six patients were excluded because of a diagnosis of bile duct obstruction but with unsuccessful biliary drainage that required immediate antibiotic treatment. The diagnosis of cholangitis was based on a rising fever, an increase in the C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and increases in leukocyte count and liver function values, which were associated with bacteremia in some. The diagnosis of acute pancreatitis was based on clinical findings, and increases in the serum amylase level (>900 IU/L), CRP level, and leukocyte count with no increase in liver chemical values. The control group had significantly more patients with post-ERCP pancreatitis (15 of 160 in the prophylaxis group vs. 4 of 155 in the control group; P = 0.009) and cholangitis (7 of 160 vs. 0 of 155; P = 0.009) compared to the prophylaxis group. Nine patients in the prophylaxis group (6%) and 15 patients in the control group (9%) had remarkably increased serum amylase levels (>900 IU/L) after ERCP, but clinical signs of acute pancreatitis with leukocytosis, CRP reaction, and pain developed in four of nine patients in the prophylaxis group compared to 15 of 15 patients with hyperamylasemia in the control group (P = 0.003). In a multivariate analysis, the lack of antibiotic prophylaxis (odds ratio 6.63, P = 0.03) and sphincterotomy (odds ratio 5.60, P = 0.05) were independent risk factors for the development of post-ERCP pancreatitis. We conclude that antibiotic prophylaxis effectively decreases the risk of pancreatitis, in addition to cholangitis after ERCP, and can thus be routinely recommended prior to ERCP. These results suggest that bacteria could play a role in the pathogenesis of post-ERCP pancreatitis

Octreotide 24-h prophylaxis in patients at high risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis: results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Pharmacological prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis is costly and not useful in most non-selected patients, in whom the incidence of pancreatitis is 5% or less. However, it could be useful and probably cost-effective, in patients at high risk for this complication, where the post-procedure pancreatitis rate is 10% and more.

AIM

To assess the efficacy of octreotide in reducing the incidence and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis and procedure-related hospital stay, in subjects with known patient-related risk factors.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients were randomly allocated to receive octreotide or not, in a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial. The drug was given subcutaneously, 200 microg t.d.s., starting 24 h before the ERCP procedure, in patients with either sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, or a history of relapsing pancreatitis or post-ERCP pancreatitis, or who were aged under 35 years, or who had a small common bile duct diameter (< 8 mm).

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients (58 in the octreotide group and 56 in the control group) completed the trial. Post-procedure pancreatitis occurred in seven octreotide-treated patients (12.0%) and eight controls (14.3%). The two groups showed no significant differences in the incidence or severity of pancreatitis. Twenty-four hours after the procedure, severe hyperamylasemia (more than five times the upper normal limit) without pancreatic-like pain was recorded in three octreotide-treated patients (5.2%) and six controls (10.7%), the difference being not significant.

CONCLUSION

Twenty-four-hour prophylaxis with octreotide proved ineffective in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis and in avoiding 24-h severe hyperamylasemia in high-risk patients.

[Cost effectiveness study on the use of somatostatin for reduction of acute pancreatitis after ERCP]

OBJECTIVES

Recent studies show that intravenous injection of somatostatin before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is associated with a significant reduction in the rate of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis. The lack of data in our environment led us to study the possible economic benefits of somatostatin administration, obtained through the reduction of costs due to post-ERCP acute pancreatitis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Theoretical study of the direct costs of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis using Markov's tree decisions. The costs of the group pre-treated with intravenous administration of 3 mg of somatostatin were compared with those of the control group. Post-ERCP rates of pancreatitis of 10% were accepted in the control group and rates of 3% were accepted in the somatostatin group. The costs of the different types of pancreatitis were as follows: costs with and without complications and with surgical intervention were based on the diagnosis related group-weights applied by the Ministry of Health in the Contract-program of the Health Service of Navarre for 1999. A sensitivity analysis was carried out to determine the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis from which an economic benefit would be obtained in the group pre-treated with somatostatin.

RESULTS

Mean theoretical cost per procedure was 121,640 pesetas for the control group and 105,539 for the group pre-treated with somatostatin. Saving per patient was 13.26% (16,101 pesetas). The sensitivity analysis revealed that in the control group premedication produced an economic benefit starting from a pancreatitis rate of 4.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Independently of the clinical benefit signifying the reduction of post-ERCP pancreatitis, somatostatin administration led to a saving of 16,101 pesetas per patient. Accepting that the pancreatitis rate in the treated group was proportionately reduced, the sensitivity analysis showed that premedication produced an economic benefit starting from a pancreatitis rate of 4.2% in the control group.

Pharmacologic treatment can prevent pancreatic injury after ERCP: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The identification of therapeutic agents that can prevent the pancreatic injury after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is of considerable importance.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis including 28 clinical trials on the use of somatostatin (12 studies), octreotide (10 studies), and gabexate mesilate (6 studies) after ERCP. Outcome measures evaluated were the incidence of acute pancreatitis, hyperamylasemia, and pancreatic pain. Three analyses were run separately: for all available studies, for randomized trials only, and for only those studies published as complete reports.

RESULTS

When all available studies were analyzed, somatostatin and gabexate mesilate were significantly associated with improvements in all three outcomes. Odds ratios (OR) for gabexate mesilate were 0.27 (95% CI [0.13, 0. 57], p = 0.001) for acute pancreatitis, 0.66 (95% CI [0.48, -0.89], p = 0.007) for hyperamylasemia, and 0.33 (95% CI [0.18, 0.58], p = 0. 0005) for post-procedural pain. Somatostatin reduced acute pancreatitis (OR 0.38: 95% CI [0.22, 0.65], p < 0.001), pain (OR 0. 24: 95% CI [0.14, 0.42], p < 0.001), and hyperamylasemia (OR 0.65: 95% CI [0.48, 0.90], p = 0.008). Octreotide was associated only with a reduced risk of post-ERCP hyperamylasemia (OR 0.51: 95% CI [0.31, 0.83], p = 0.007) but had no effect on acute pancreatitis and pain. The statistical significance of data did not change after analyzing randomized trials only or studies published as complete reports. For each considered outcome, the publication bias assessment and the number of patients that need to be treated to prevent one adverse effect were, respectively, higher and lower for somatostatin than for gabexate mesilate.

CONCLUSIONS

The pancreatic injury after ERCP can be prevented with the administration of either somatostatin or gabexate mesilate, but the former agent is more cost-effective. Additional studies comparing the efficacy of short-term infusion of somatostatin versus gabexate mesilate in patients at high risk for post-ERCP complications seem warranted.

Prophylactic effect of somatostatin on post-ERCP pancreatitis: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin is a potent inhibitor of pancreatic secretion and has been studied for its prophylactic effect on post-ERCP pancreatitis. However, results of previous trials have been inconclusive.

METHODS

A prospective double-blind controlled study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of somatostatin in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis. Post-ERCP enzyme elevation, abdominal pain and pancreatitis were evaluated and compared between 109 patients randomized to receive somatostatin infusion and 111 patients randomized to receive normal saline infusion (placebo); both started 30 minutes before ERCP and continued for 12 hours.

RESULTS

Post-ERCP elevation of serum amylase and lipase levels at 6 and 24 hours after ERCP was less frequent in the group given somatostatin but not statistically significant. There was a tendency toward lower mean serum amylase and lipase levels at 24 hours in patients given somatostatin, although the difference was not statistically significant either. Eight patients given somatostatin (7%) and 18 patients given placebo (16%) had significant abdominal pain after ERCP requiring analgesia (p = 0.04). The frequency of clinical pancreatitis was significantly lower in patients given somatostatin (3%) than in those given placebo (10%) (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic treatment with somatostatin reduced the frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Serum amylase measured four hours after endoscopic sphincterotomy is a reliable predictor of postprocedure pancreatitis

OBJECTIVE

Acute pancreatitis is a common complication after endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The aim of this study was to detect the time when the peak of serum amylase was predictive for pancreatitis or severe hyperamylasemia, to plan a prolonged follow-up in the hospital and for outpatients.

METHODS

In a prospective series of 409 consecutive patients undergoing ES, serum amylase activity was measured immediately before the procedure and 2, 4, 8, and 24 h thereafter; the data obtained at 2, 4, and 8 h were compared with those at 24 h and with the outcome. Sensitivity for long-lasting severe hyperamylasemia (more than five times the upper normal limit) and pancreatitis were also defined for all sampling times.

RESULTS

At 24 h after ES, amylase was still more than five times the upper normal limit in 26 patients, 19 of whom had mild/moderate acute pancreatitis. There was a significant difference (p < 0.01 at all sampling times) between the 26 patients with 24-h severe hyperamylasemia and those with lower levels. The sensitivity of amylase measurement in detecting pancreatitis or long-lasting severe hyperamylasemia was highest at 8 h. However, the 4-h assessment appears to be a reliable predictor in practice, as more than two-thirds of cases of pancreatitis (all but one with computed tomography-confirmed pancreatitis) occurred among patients whose 4-h amylasemia was higher than five times the upper normal limit.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum amylase assessment 4 h after ES minimizes the likelihood of underestimating the risk of postprocedure pancreatitis. It is therefore a reliable, cost-effective follow-up, particularly in outpatients.

Use of corticosteriods in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: results of a controlled prospective study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this prospective controlled study was to determine whether prophylactic corticosteroids decrease the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

METHODS

A double-blind comparison of hydrocortisone (100 mg by i.v. infusion immediately before endoscopy) with placebo (sodium chloride administered in the same fashion). A total of 535 patients (286 women and 249 men, with an average age of 58.6 yr) who were scheduled to undergo diagnostic or operative ERCP underwent randomization. Six patients were excluded from the final evaluation for various reasons. The remaining 529 patients, 263 in the hydrocortisone group and 266 in the placebo group, were analyzed. Patients were divided into subgroups with regard to high risk factors for acute pancreatitis after ERCP.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of acute pancreatitis was 5.3% (28 of 529 patients). Procedure-induced pancreatitis occurred in 15 of 263 (5.7%) patients treated with hydrocortisone and in 13 of 266 (4.9%) patients treated with placebo (p = NS). The results of analysis of risk factors for pancreatitis did not evidence any significant difference between the hydrocortisone group and the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Hydrocortisone does not prevent acute pancreatitis after diagnostic or therapeutic ERCP.