Effects of cisapride on gastric emptying of oil and aqueous meal components, hunger, and fullness

Systematic review: cardiovascular safety profile of 5-HT(4) agonists developed for gastrointestinal disorders

BACKGROUND

The nonselective 5-HT(4) receptor agonists, cisapride and tegaserod have been associated with cardiovascular adverse events (AEs).

AIM

To perform a systematic review of the safety profile, particularly cardiovascular, of 5-HT(4) agonists developed for gastrointestinal disorders, and a nonsystematic summary of their pharmacology and clinical efficacy.

METHODS

Articles reporting data on cisapride, clebopride, prucalopride, mosapride, renzapride, tegaserod, TD-5108 (velusetrag) and ATI-7505 (naronapride) were identified through a systematic search of the Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase and Toxfile. Abstracts from UEGW 2006-2008 and DDW 2008-2010 were searched for these drug names, and pharmaceutical companies approached to provide unpublished data.

RESULTS

Retrieved articles on pharmacokinetics, human pharmacodynamics and clinical data with these 5-HT(4) agonists, are reviewed and summarised nonsystematically. Articles relating to cardiac safety and tolerability of these agents, including any relevant case reports, are reported systematically. Two nonselective 5-HT(4) agonists had reports of cardiovascular AEs: cisapride (QT prolongation) and tegaserod (ischaemia). Interactions with, respectively, the hERG cardiac potassium channel and 5-HT(1) receptor subtypes have been suggested to account for these effects. No cardiovascular safety concerns were reported for the newer, selective 5-HT(4) agonists prucalopride, velusetrag, naronapride, or for nonselective 5-HT(4) agonists with no hERG or 5-HT(1) affinity (renzapride, clebopride, mosapride).

CONCLUSIONS

5-HT(4) agonists for GI disorders differ in chemical structure and selectivity for 5-HT(4) receptors. Selectivity for 5-HT(4) over non-5-HT(4) receptors may influence the agent's safety and overall risk-benefit profile. Based on available evidence, highly selective 5-HT(4) agonists may offer improved safety to treat patients with impaired GI motility.

Cisapride: what can we learn from the rise and fall of a prokinetic?

Cisapride, the prototype serotonergic agent, evolved from a body of research that defined the key roles of serotonergic receptors in gastrointestinal motor and sensory function. Impressed by its in vitro properties and encouraged by clinical trial data, cisapride became the drug of choice for the treatment of a wide range of motility disorders and clinicians appeared impressed by its efficacy and comfortable with its side-effect profile. Once serious cardiac events began to be reported in association with cisapride therapy, dark clouds rapidly gathered and soon enveloped the drug, leading to its widespread withdrawal from markets. What lessons can we learn from the story of cisapride? How can its brief but spectacular rise and equally sensational demise inform the development of new drugs which are so sorely needed in the management of motility and functional gastrointestinal disorders? This review explores the background to the development of cisapride, its history in clinical trials and the experience with adverse events and, in so doing, attempts to identify lessons for the future in the therapeutics of enteric neuromodulatory drugs.

Gastrointestinal targets of appetite regulation in humans

The aim of this paper is to describe and discuss relevant aspects of the assessment of physiological functions - and related biomarkers - implicated in the regulation of appetite in humans. A short introduction provides the background and the present state of biomarker research as related to satiety and appetite. The main focus of the paper is on the gastrointestinal tract and its functions and biomarkers related to appetite for which sufficient data are available in human studies. The first section describes how gastric emptying, stomach distension and gut motility influence appetite; the second part describes how selected gastrointestinal peptides are involved in the control of satiety and appetite (ghrelin, cholecystokinin, glucagon-like peptide, peptide tyrosin-tyrosin) and can be used as potential biomarkers. For both sections, methodological aspects (adequacy, accuracy and limitation of the methods) are described. The last section focuses on new developments in techniques and methods for the assessment of physiological targets involved in appetite regulation (including brain imaging, interesting new experimental approaches, targets and markers). The conclusion estimates the relevance of selected biomarkers as representative markers of appetite regulation, in view of the current state of the art.

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of itopride (100 and 200 mg three times daily) on gastric motor and sensory function in healthy volunteers

Itopride, a dopamine D2 antagonist and acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, significantly improved symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia in one phase II randomized trial. However, the mechanisms by which itopride may improve symptoms are unknown. We aimed to compare the effects of two doses of itopride and placebo on gastric volumes, gastric emptying, small bowel transit and satiation in female and male healthy volunteers. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated gastric function before and after 7 days of itopride 100 mg (n = 16) or 200 mg (n = 15) or placebo (n = 15) t.i.d. Validated methods were used to study gastric accommodation (single photon emission computed tomography), gastric emptying and orocecal transit and satiation postnutrient challenge. The three arms were comparable with regard to age, gender and body mass index. There were no statistically significant effects of itopride on gastric emptying, orocecal transit, fasting gastric volume, maximum tolerated volume or aggregate symptom score with nutrient drink challenge. Postprandial (PP) change in gastric volume differed in the three groups (P = 0.019): 625[+/-28 (SEM)], 555(+/-26) and 512(+/-33) in placebo, itopride 100 and 200 mg groups, respectively. In healthy subjects, itopride reduced total PP gastric volume without accelerating gastric emptying or significantly altering gastric motor and sensory function in healthy individuals.

Radioisotopic assessment of gastric emptying of solids in elderly subjects

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Few studies in literature have investigated the gastric emptying of solids in elderly subjects. We assessed the differences between young and elderly subjects in the gastric emptying rate of solids by a radioisotopic method.

METHODS

Two groups of 15 elderly male subjects (mean age 68.20 years and 77.26 years, respectively) and a group of young male subjects (mean age 30.23 years) underwent a radioisotopic study of gastric emptying after eating a radiolabeled solid meal. Half-time of gastric emptying (T1/2) and emptying index (EI), i.e. rate of gastric emptying at 120 min, were measured with two opposing detectors connected to a computerized rate-meter. Results are expressed as means +/- SD.

RESULTS

Significantly different values were obtained in the two groups both at T1/2 (183+/-88 and 195+/-75, respectively) and EI (0.40+/-0.3 and 0.36+/-0.4), compared with young subjects (T1/2=53+/-23; EI=1.10+/-0.3) (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric emptying of solids is significantly delayed in elderly men; this variable must be taken into account when studies on gastric emptying rates are performed.

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effects of tegaserod on gastric motor, sensory and myoelectric function in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

The effects of tegaserod on gastric accommodation and postprandial satiety remain unclear.

AIM

To compare the effects of tegaserod 6 mg twice daily vs. placebo on gastric volumes, postprandial symptoms, gastric emptying, small bowel transit and the surface electrogastrogram in female and male healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated gastric function before and after 7 days of tegaserod 6 mg twice daily (n = 21) vs. placebo (n = 20) in healthy volunteers. Validated methods were used to study gastric emptying, myoelectrical activity, volumes and satiation postnutrient challenge.

RESULTS

There were no significant effects of tegaserod on the primary endpoints assessing gastric function: emptying of solids or liquids, total gastric volumes or myoelectrical activity. Maximum tolerated volume and aggregate symptom score with nutrient challenge on placebo were 1,035 mL (+/-44) and 130 (+/-15) vs. 989 mL (+/-43) and 117 (+/-15) during tegaserod, respectively (all P = N.S.). Postprandial change in proximal gastric volume by single photon emission-computed tomography was decreased in females on tegaserod (246 +/- 30) vs. placebo (358 +/- 32) (P = 0.015). Proximal fasting volumes in females were increased on tegaserod (126 +/- 12) vs. placebo (92 +/- 13) (P = 0.066).

CONCLUSIONS

While tegaserod decreased proximal gastric volume change after a meal, it does not appear to have significant effects on gastric motor and sensory function in healthy individuals. Further studies are required in patients with disturbances of gastric motor and sensory function.

Effects of intraduodenal fatty acids on appetite, antropyloroduodenal motility, and plasma CCK and GLP-1 in humans vary with their chain length

The gastrointestinal effects of intraluminal fats may be critically dependent on the chain length of fatty acids released during lipolysis. We postulated that intraduodenal administration of lauric acid (12 carbon atoms; C12) would suppress appetite, modulate antropyloroduodenal pressure waves (PWs), and stimulate the release of cholecystokinin (CCK) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) more than an identical dose of decanoic acid (10 carbon atoms; C10). Eight healthy males (19-47 yr old) were studied on three occasions in a double-blind, randomized fashion. Appetite perceptions, antropyloroduodenal PWs, and plasma CCK and GLP-1 concentrations were measured during a 90-min intraduodenal infusion of 1) C12, 2) C10, or 3) control (rate: 2 ml/min, 0.375 kcal/min for C12/C10). Energy intake at a buffet meal, immediately after completion of the infusion, was also quantified. C12, but not C10, suppressed appetite perceptions (P < 0.001) and energy intake (control: 4,604 +/- 464 kJ, C10: 4,109 +/- 588 kJ, and C12: 1,747 +/- 632 kJ; P < 0.001, C12 vs. control/C10). C12, but not C10, also induced nausea (P < 0.001). C12 stimulated basal pyloric pressures and isolated pyloric PWs and suppressed antral and duodenal PWs compared with control (P < 0.05 for all). C10 transiently stimulated isolated pyloric PWs (P = 0.001) and had no effect on antral PWs but markedly stimulated duodenal PWs (P = 0.004). C12 and C10 increased plasma CCK (P < 0.001), but the effect of C12 was substantially greater (P = 0.001); C12 stimulated GLP-1 (P < 0.05), whereas C10 did not. In conclusion, there are major differences in the effects of intraduodenal C12 and C10, administered at 0.375 kcal/min, on appetite, energy intake, antropyloroduodenal PWs, and gut hormone release in humans.

Effect of cisapride on gastric sensitivity to distension, gastric compliance and duodeno-gastric reflexes in healthy humans

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Visceral hypersensitivity and impaired gastric relaxation after the ingestion of a meal are frequent features in patients with functional dyspepsia. Cisapride improves dyspeptic symptoms. The study aims to evaluate whether cisapride influences gastric sensitivity to distension as well as gastric compliance and duodenogastric reflexes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eight healthy males were studied on two different days, each after 7 days' treatment either with placebo or cisapride 10 mg qid in randomized order. A spherical bag connected to a barostat was placed in the gastric fundus and an 8-lumen manometric catheter was positioned with 4 side holes in antrum and 4 in duodenum. During a phase II of the migrating motor complex, the intragastric bag was inflated at a constant pressure 1 mm Hg above the intra-abdominal pressure and the gastric volume was measured during intraduodenal infusion of lipids and citric acid at different rates. Once the stomach returned to the basal volume, the bag was distended according to two different protocols until subjects reported discomfort. Antroduodenal motility was measured throughout the study.

RESULTS

Intraduodenal infusion of lipids and citric acid caused relaxation of gastric fundus. Relaxation was similar for lipids and acid (203 +/- 30 vs 199 +/- 43 ml), and was not influenced by cisapride and infusion rate. Cisapride did not influence gastric sensitivity to distension (10 +/- 1.5 vs 9.7 +/- 1.3 mm Hg) and gastric compliance (52.7 +/- 1.2 vs 49.8 +/- 1.8 ml/mm Hg). The antral motor index significantly decreased following infusion of acid and lipids with placebo but not with cisapride.

CONCLUSIONS

Cisapride inhibits the physiological duodenoantral reflexes but does not influence either the mechanical properties of the gastric fundus nor the gastric sensitivity to distension.

Effects of posture on gastric emptying and satiety ratings after a nutritive liquid and solid meal

To study the effects of posture and meal structure on gastric emptying and satiety, nine women ingested tomato soup and then immediately or 20 min later an egg sandwich, when seated and when supine. The lag time was not different, but the half-emptying time of the sandwich was 32% longer (P < 0.01) and the emptying rate after the lag phase was 39% slower (P < 0.01) when the subjects were supine than when they were seated. The half-emptying time of the soup was 50% longer (P < 0.01) when the subjects were supine and ingested the soup immediately before the sandwich than in the other three conditions. Postprandial hunger ratings recovered more slowly (P < 0.01) when the subjects ingested the soup 20 min before the sandwich than when they ingested the soup immediately before the sandwich. These results suggest that posture did not affect the intragastric distribution of the sandwich but affected propulsion of the meal into the intestine and that postprandial satiety was enhanced by the cumulative effect over time of a 20-min "head start" in stimulation of intestinal receptors by emptying of the soup.

Functional gut disorders: from motility to sensitivity disorders. A review of current and investigational drugs for their management

Functional gut disorders include several clinical entities defined on the basis of symptom patterns (e.g., functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, functional abdominal pain, functional abdominal bloating), for which there is no established pathophysiological mechanism. Because there is no well-defined pathophysiological target, treatment should be aimed at symptom improvement. Prokinetics and antispasmodics have been widely used in the treatment of functional gut disorders on the assumption that disordered motility is the underlying cause of symptoms, and symptom improvement is indeed achievable with these compounds in some, but not all, patients with features of hypo- or hypermotility, respectively. In the first part of this review, we cover the basic pharmacology and discuss the rationale for the clinical use of prokinetics and antispasmodics. On the other hand, in the past few years, the explosive growth in the research focusing on visceral sensitivity and visceral reflexes has suggested that at least some patients with functional gut disorders have altered visceral perception. Thus, the second part of the review covers these developments and focuses on studies addressing the issue of drugs modulating visceral sensitivity.

Relevance of gastrointestinal motor disturbances in functional dyspepsia

Gastrointestinal motor abnormalities are frequent findings in patients with functional dyspepsia. However, these abnormalities are rather non-specific and seem to be restricted to a proportion of patients. Furthermore, they are not necessarily time-linked to symptom perception. The relationship of digestive motor derangements and symptoms in functional dyspepsia remains, therefore, unsettled. A variety of methodological and conceptual shortcomings characterize many of the studies investigating the relationship between gastrointestinal motility disorders and dyspeptic symptoms, and this obviously contributes to a higher level of uncertainty in the field. Recent reports suggest that gastrointestinal dysmotility is associated with perception of some dyspeptic symptoms, at least in a subset of patients. Well-conducted studies using appropriate methodology are needed to verify whether gastrointestinal motor disorders play a causal role in functional dyspepsia and whether this is of clinical relevance.

The effect of cisapride on oral and intravenous glucose tolerance in normal subjects

Cisapride is used widely for the treatment of diabetic gastroparesis. There is some evidence that cisapride may influence insulin secretion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of cisapride on plasma concentrations of glucose, insulin and C-peptide in response to oral and intravenous glucose loads. Twelve normal subjects took cisapride and placebo, each for 10 days using a randomized, double-blind, crossover design. In each treatment phase, the plasma glucose, insulin and C-peptide response to intravenous (0.5 g/kg) and oral (75 g) glucose loads was evaluated on separate days. Gastric emptying of the oral glucose load was also measured. After the intravenous glucose load, plasma concentrations of C-peptide were higher (P< 0.01) on cisapride when compared with placebo (e.g. peak C-peptide 2.08+/-0.25 nmol/L vs 1.78+/-0.22 nmol/L, P< 0.01) while there was no significant difference in plasma glucose or insulin. Cisapride had no effect on the rate of gastric emptying of the oral glucose load. Mean plasma concentrations of insulin and C-peptide were higher after oral glucose on cisapride than placebo, but these differences were not significantly different. These observations indicate that cisapride may increase glucose-stimulated insulin secretion.