Multivariate analysis of pathophysiological factors in reflux oesophagitis

Effect of gastric helicobacter pylori colonization in the development of erosive esophagitis in patients with hiatal hernia

Background/Aims

There may be various factors that determine gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as a result of hiatal hernia (HH) (such as the size of the hernia, age, other host and environmental factors) and the presence of protective factors to explain the absence of reflux disease should not be ignored. Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection can prevent the development of GERD or cause it. This study aimed to determine whether Hp colonized in the stomach and hernia affects the development of erosive esophagitis (EE) in patients with HH.

Materials and Methods

In this case-controlled study, 111 patients with HH were eligible for the study. Study group with EE (n = 61, 55%) and control group without EE (n = 50, 45%) were formed. Groups were compared for gastric Hp and Hp in the hernia.

Results

While the frequency of Hp in the antrum was 55.7% in the group with EE, it was 30% in the control group (p = 0.01, OR: 2.94 in 95% CI 1.34-6.46). The rates in terms of HP frequency in the corpus were 43.6% and 32.1%, respectively, (p = 0.45). Hp colonization in HH was detected in 18 cases (29.50%) and 14 cases (28%), respectively, (p = 0.86). In regression analysis, antral Hp was found to be effective in the development of EE (p = 0.01).

Conclusion

As a result of this study, we think that antral Hp may have a causative role in the development of reflux esophagitis, but the presence of Hp in HH does not have an effective role in reflux esophagitis formation.

Effect of alginate in patients with GERD hiatal hernia matters

Alginate-based formulations are frequently used as add-on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy to help control of heartburn and regurgitation. There are limited data regarding the mechanisms and effects of alginate-based formulations. We aimed to evaluate the effects of the sodium alginate intake and its likely temporal relations on intraesophageal reflux events by MII-pH in patients with and without hiatal hernia (HH). Fifty GERD patients (18 with HH, 32 without HH) with heartburn or regurgitation once a week or more common were included. After combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH-metry (MII-pH) had been performed, all patients were asked to eat the same standard meal (double cheeseburger, 1 banana, 100 g regular yoghurt, and 200 mL water with total energy value of 744 kcal: 37.6% of carbohydrates, 21.2% of proteins, and 41.2% of lipids) during two consecutive days. On separate random two consecutive days, all patients took 10 mL of sodium alginate (GA; Gaviscon Advance; Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare, Hull, UK) or 10 mL of water, 30 minutes after the refluxogenic meal. After eating refluxogenic meal, patients were examined ½ hour for basal conditions, 1 hour in upright, and 1 hour in supine positions. Alginate significantly decreased acid reflux after intake at the first hour in comparison to water in patients with HH (6.1 vs. 13.7, P = 0.004) and without HH (3.5 vs. 5.5, P = 0.001). Weakly acid reflux were increased at the first hour in patients with HH (3.4 vs. 1.3, P = 0.019) and without HH (1.7 vs. 5, P = 0.02) compared to water. There was no distinctive effect of alginate on the height of proximal migration of reflux events in patients with HH and without HH. Alginate decreases acid reflux events within a limited time period, especially at the first hour both in patients with and without HH. Alginate has no effect on the height of reflux events along the esophagus both in patients with and without HH.

Esophageal Acidification During Nocturnal Acid-breakthrough with Ilaprazole Versus Omeprazole in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Background/Aims

Though nocturnal acid-breakthrough (NAB) is common in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients, its clinical importance results from esophageal acidification, which has been shown to be uncommon. Ilaprazole, a long-acting proton pump inhibitor, may cause NAB infrequently. Accordingly, we studied prospectively, (1) frequency and degree of esophageal acidification during NAB, and (2) frequency and severity of NAB while on ilaprazole versus omeprazole.

Methods

Fifty-eight consecutive patients with GERD on once daily ilaprazole, 10 mg (n = 28) or omeprazole, 20 mg (n = 30) for > one month underwent 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring prospectively. NAB was defined as intra-gastric pH < 4 for > one hour during night, and esophageal acidification as pH < 4 for any duration. Nocturnal symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, and chest pain) were also recorded.

Results

Of the 58 patients (age 35.5 [inter-quartile range 26.5-46.0] years, 38 [65.5%], 42 (72.4%) had NAB. Though patients with NAB had lower nocturnal intra-gastric pH than without (2.8 [1.9-4.1] vs 5.7 [4.6-6.8], P < 0.001), frequency and duration of nocturnal esophageal acidification (17/42 vs 4/16, P = 0.360 and 0.0 [0.0-1.0] vs 0.0 [0.0-0.3] minutes, P = 0.260, respectively) and symptoms were comparable (13/42 vs 6/16, P = 0.750). Though ilaprazole was associated with less NABs (1 [range 1-2, n = 19] vs 1 [range 1-3, n = 23], P = 0.010) than omeprazole, the frequency, duration, and mean intra-gastric pH during NAB were comparable (19/28 vs 23/30, P = 0.560; 117 [0-315] vs 159 [69-287] minutes, P = 0.500; 1.02 [0.7-1.4] vs 1.04 [0.44-1.3], P = 0.620, respectively).

Conclusions

Though NAB was common while patients were on a proton pump inhibitor, esophageal acidification was uncommon. Frequency and severity of NAB were comparable among patients on ilaprazole and omeprazole, except for the lesser number of NABs with ilaprazole.

A Chronological Increase in Gastric Acid Secretion from 1995 to 2014 in Young Japanese Healthy Volunteers under the Age of 40 Years Old

Gastric acid secretion levels are an important determinant of the manifestation of acid-related upper GI diseases such as gastroesophageal reflux disease. We recently reported that gastric acid secretion levels did not change from the 1990s to 2010s in H. pylori-negative asymptomatic Japanese outpatients with a mean age of 63 years old. However, because young people have a quite different lifestyle, including dietary pattern, from elderly people in Japan, it is worth investigating any chronologic changes in gastric acid secretion in younger generations. The aim of this analysis is to investigate the potential changes in gastric acid secretion from 1995 to 2014 in young Japanese healthy volunteers. Eighty-eight young Japanese healthy volunteers under the age of 40 with a mean age of 26 were extracted from a database accumulated from 1995 to 2014 for the present analysis. Their gastrin-stimulated gastric acid level was determined with the endoscopic gastrin test. In 76 H. pylori-negative subjects, gastric acid secretion levels showed a significant positive correlation with the calendar year when the test was performed (r = 0.27, p < 0.01). A similar trend was observed in 12 H. pylori-positive subjects. A chronological 5-year time period showed a significant positive association with gastric acid secretion in univariate and multivariate analyses (p < 0.01 and p = 0.01, respectively). Gastric acid secretion levels have been increasing in young Japanese healthy volunteers during the last 20 years. We need to monitor future trends in the prevalence of acid-related diseases such as gastro-esophageal reflux disease in Japan.

Recurrence and Its Impact on the Health-related Quality of Life in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Prospective Follow-up Analysis

Background/Aims

Limited data exist on the outcome of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) treatment and its impact on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the Asian population. This study aims to evaluate the treatment outcomes, to investigate the factors associated with recurrence, and to evaluate the impact of the treatment outcome on the HRQoL in a Korean GERD population.

Methods

This was a prospective, multicenter study involving a total of 824 GERD patients. The response to treatment was assessed at week 4 (or week 8 for the patients who did not achieve complete resolution [CR] at week 4). The EQ-5D questionnaire was used at baseline, end of treatment, and first recurrence to assess the HRQoL. To assess GERD symptoms, contact of patients by phone at 1, 6, and 12 months following treatment was carried out.

Results

CR was achieved in 65.6% and recurrence was observed in 47.8% following treatment. CR and recurrence rates did not differ by the presence of esophagitis. Multivariate analysis revealed that acid regurgitation (odds ratio 2.249; 95% confidence interval 1.293–3.912; P = 0.004) and both acid regurgitation and heartburn (odds ratio 2.330; 95% confidence interval 1.392–3.901; P = 0.001) were independent risk factors for GERD recurrence. EQ-5D scores were more improved in patients with CR than in those without CR, and worsened more during follow-up in patients with recurrence than in those without recurrence.

Conclusions

We should achieve complete symptom relief and attempt to prevent recurrence in GERD patients to improve their HRQoL.

Surgical techniques to prevent reflux esophagitis in proximal gastrectomy reconstructed by esophagogastrostomy with preservation of the lower esophageal sphincter, pyloric and celiac branches of the vagal nerve, and reconstruction of the new His angle for early proximal gastric cancer

PURPOSE

This article describes the surgical techniques to prevent reflux esophagitis (RE) after proximal gastrectomy reconstructed by esophagogastrostomy (PGE) preservation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and both pyloric and celiac branches of the vagal nerve (PCVN), and reconstruction of the new His angle (HA) for early proximal gastric cancer (PGC).

METHODS

Twenty patients after PGE were divided into 2 groups (group A: 10 patients without preserved LES and PCVN for advanced PGC; group B: 10 patients with preserved LES and PCNV and the addition of a new HA for early PGC). A postoperative interview on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and satisfaction with this procedure and the collection of endoscopic findings for RE and stasis of the remnant stomach (SRS) were conducted 1 year after PGE in groups A and B.

RESULTS

The rates of proton pump inhibitor administration and the symptoms of GERD, RE and SRS in group A were significantly higher than those in group B (p = 0.0433, p = 0.0190, p = 0.0253, p = 0.0190, respectively). Seven out of 10 patients in group A voiced dissatisfaction. Patients in group B were significantly more satisfied with this procedure than those in group A (p = 0.0010).

CONCLUSION

This method is useful for preventing postoperative GERD including RE in early PGC patients.

Time series analysis of gastric acid secretion over a 20-year period in normal Japanese men

BACKGROUND

The gastric acid secretion level is an important determinant for the manifestation of the gastroesophageal reflux disease spectrum, finally leading to the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Although the incidence of EAC has remained low in Asia, understanding the recent trend in gastric acid secretion should be helpful in estimating future incidences of EAC in that area. We investigated the latest chronological change (1995-2014) in gastric acid secretion in normal Japanese patients.

METHODS

A total of 307 asymptomatic Japanese men who attended the clinic for annual endoscopic checkups from 1995 to 2014 were enrolled in this analysis. Gastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion was estimated with the endoscopic gastrin test. The association between gastric acid secretion and chronological period was assessed with a multivariate linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

Overall gastric acid secretion gradually increased over the 20-year period in the entire cohort in the unadjusted analysis (p < 0.05). However, the apparent increase was largely related to the relative decreasing rate of H. pylori infection, which profoundly inhibited gastric acid secretion. Gastric acid secretion did not change over the 20-year period in H. pylori-negative subjects, and it showed only a mild increase during this period in H. pylori-positive subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering that gastric acid secretion remained unchanged in H. pylori-negative Japanese men over a 20-year period at a level much lower than that in Occidental subjects, upper gastrointestinal disease profiles in the Japanese population will differ from those in Western countries in the post-H. pylori era.

Significance of the lower esophageal sphincter preservation in preventing alkaline reflux esophagitis in patients after total gastrectomy reconstructed by Roux-en-Y for gastric cancer

To clarify the significance of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) for prevention of alkaline reflux esophagitis (ARE) after total gastrectomy reconstructed by Roux-en-Y (TGRY) for gastric cancer, we investigated LES function and lower esophageal pH in TGRY patients with or without LES preservation. A total of 51 patients 5 years after TGRY were divided into groups A (26 patients without preserved LES) and B (25 patients with preserved LES) and compared with 22 control participants (group C). Manometric study and ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring were performed on all patients. Symptomatic and endoscopic AREs in group A were significantly higher than those in group B (P < 0.05). The length of LES and maximum LES pressure in group A were significantly shorter and lower, respectively, than in groups B and C (P < 0.01). The length of LES and maximum LES pressure in patients with symptomatic ARE were significantly shorter and lower, respectively, than in patients without symptomatic ARE (P < 0.01). Percentages of time with pH >7 and pH >8 within 24 hours in group A were significantly higher than those in groups B and C (P < 0.01). Preservation of the LES may be necessary to prevent ARE after TGRY.

Bolus retention in hiatal hernia identified by high-resolution esophageal manometry with impedance

BACKGROUND

Esophageal acid retention in a hiatal hernia (HH) may play a role in gastro-esophageal reflux. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of bolus retention (BR) in HH and to compare pressure profiles in patients with HH with BR in the hernia to those with bolus clearance (BC) through the hernia using high-resolution esophageal manometry with impedance (HREMI).

METHODS

Clinical HREMI studies with HH ≥1.5 cm were analyzed for lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and crural diaphragm (CD) pressures and pressure profiles during 12 saline swallows. Impedance was analyzed for swallow retention in the HH.

KEY RESULTS

Bolus retention in a HH was present in 35 of 53 (66%) patients with a HH. Patients with BR had overall lower pressure profiles including a lower basal LES pressure (14.8 ± 10.6 vs 28.9 ± 16.8 mmHg; p = 0.0001), LES-CD gradient (6.8 ± 17.9 vs 20.6 ± 12.2 mmHg; p = 0.002), residual LES pressure (2.5 ± 4.6 vs 6.1 ± 12.2 mmHg; p = 0.017), amplitude of distal esophageal contractions (83.2 ± 38.8 vs 111.2 ± 42.8 mmHg; p = 0.020), and distal contractile integral (1487 ± 1016 vs 2608 ± 1221 mmHg-cm-sec; p = 0.001) compared to the BC group. Patients with BR were more likely to have a larger sized HH compared to the BC group (3.1 ± 1.6 vs 2.1 ± 0.6 cm; p = 0.016); similar pressure changes were found when the groups were divided up by HH sizes.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Bolus retention was seen in 66% of patients with HH. Bolus retention in the HH was associated with larger HH size, lower LES pressure, and lower esophageal contractile pressures compared to those with BC.

Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in typical and atypical GERD: roles of gastroesophageal acid refluxes and esophageal motility

BACKGROUND/AIM

To determine the roles of gastroesophageal acid reflux (GER) and esophageal dysmotility on typical and atypical GERD symptoms.

METHODS

Two hundred thirty-six patients (159 females, age 47 ± 14 years) with typical and atypical GERD symptom(s) for > 3 months underwent standard water perfused esophageal manometry (EM) and 24 h esophageal pH studies during off therapy.

RESULTS

Eighty seven and 93 patients had positive lower esophageal pH tests and abnormal EM, respectively. Patients with positive lower esophageal pH test were significantly older (50 ± 13 vs 45 ± 13 years, P < 0.005) and had higher prevalence of acid regurgitation symptoms than patients with negative test (56/87 vs 72/149, P < 0.05). Patients with positive upper esophageal pH test (n = 67) also had significantly higher prevalence of acid regurgitation symptoms (43/67 vs 74/152, P < 0.05). Prevalence of other upper gastrointestinal and respiratory symptoms were similar between patients with positive and negative upper and lower pH test. Patients with abnormal EM were significantly older (49 ± 14 vs 45 ± 13 years, P < 0.05) and had higher prevalence of chronic cough than patients with normal EM(30/93 vs 26/143, P < 0.05). In patients with positive pH tests, the prevalence of dysphagia, chronic cough, and hoarseness of voice were significantly higher in patients with abnormal than those with normal EM (18/31 vs 18/56, P < 0.05; 12/31 vs 6/56, P < 0.005 and 19/31 vs 18/56, P < 0.01, respectively). Whereas in patients with negative lower pH tests, only the prevalence of heartburn was significantly lower in patients with normal than those with abnormal EM (26/87 vs 30/62, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Acid regurgitation but not heartburn was associated with GER. Esophageal dysmotility had no significant effect on acid regurgitation symptom but associated with chronic cough, hoarseness of voice, and dysphagia only in patients with abnormal esophageal acid exposure.

A new method for determining gastric acid output using a wireless pH-sensing capsule

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and gastric acid hypersecretion respond well to suppression of gastric acid secretion. However, clinical management and research in diseases of acid secretion have been hindered by the lack of a non-invasive, accurate and reproducible tool to measure gastric acid output (GAO). Thus, symptoms or, in refractory cases, invasive testing may guide acid suppression therapy.

AIM

To present and validate a novel, non-invasive method of GAO analysis in healthy subjects using a wireless pH sensor, SmartPill (SP) (SmartPill Corporation, Buffalo, NY, USA).

METHODS

Twenty healthy subjects underwent conventional GAO studies with a nasogastric tube. Variables impacting liquid meal-stimulated GAO analysis were assessed by modelling and in vitro verification. Buffering capacity of Ensure Plus was empirically determined. SP GAO was calculated using the rate of acidification of the Ensure Plus meal. Gastric emptying scintigraphy and GAO studies with radiolabelled Ensure Plus and SP assessed emptying time, acidification rate and mixing. Twelve subjects had a second SP GAO study to assess reproducibility.

RESULTS

Meal-stimulated SP GAO analysis was dependent on acid secretion rate and meal-buffering capacity, but not on gastric emptying time. On repeated studies, SP GAO strongly correlated with conventional basal acid output (BAO) (r = 0.51, P = 0.02), maximal acid output (MAO) (r = 0.72, P = 0.0004) and peak acid output (PAO) (r = 0.60, P = 0.006). The SP sampled the stomach well during meal acidification.

CONCLUSIONS

SP GAO analysis is a non-invasive, accurate and reproducible method for the quantitative measurement of GAO in healthy subjects. SP GAO analysis could facilitate research and clinical management of GERD and other disorders of gastric acid secretion.

Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease

The gastroesophageal junction is structurally complex and functionally designed to ensure the acid secreted by the most proximal gastric mucosa flows towards the stomach and not up onto the oesophageal squamous mucosa. The pattern and mechanism of reflux vary with the severity of reflux disease and this probably represents different ends of a spectrum rather than distinct pathophysiological mechanisms. Nearly all patients with severe reflux disease have hiatus hernia, however, a substantial proportion of patients with mild reflux disease do not, and this may be a result of intermittent or partial hiatus hernia undetectable by current available tools. The acid pocket is an area of post-prandial unbuffered gastric acidity immediately distal to the gastroesophageal junction and which is enlarged in patients with hiatus hernia. The acid pocket provides a reservoir of acid available to reflux when the intrinsic sphincter fails. Central obesity is an important factor in the aetiology of reflux and does this by the increased abdomino-thoracic pressure gradient inducing hiatus hernia and increasing the rate of flow of reflux when sphincter opens. Central obesity also induces short segment intrasphincteric reflux and thereby columnar metaplasia of the most distal oesophagus.

Effect of nitrite delivered in saliva on postprandial gastro-esophageal function

OBJECTIVE

Acid reflux produces troublesome symptoms (heartburn) and complications including esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, and adenocarcinoma. Reflux occurs due to excessive and inappropriate relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. An important mediator of this is nitric oxide, high concentrations of which are generated within the lumen when swallowed saliva meets gastric acid. Saliva contains nitrite, derived from the enterosalivary recirculation of dietary nitrate, which is reduced to nitric oxide by gastric acid. The aim of this study was to investigate whether salivary nitrite contributes to dysfunction of the lower esophageal sphincter.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 20 volunteers, studies of gastro-esophageal function were performed on four separate days, following consumption of a standardized meal, with saliva nitrite concentrations modified differently each day by intra-oral nitrite infusion.

RESULTS

The infusions produced an appropriate range in saliva nitrite concentrations, from below to well above the physiological range. The standardized meal induced expected physiological changes in gastro-esophageal function confirming the recordings were sensitive and robust. Esophageal acid exposure (primary outcome) was similar on each study day. Secondary outcomes, including number and duration of reflux events, rate of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations, lower esophageal sphincter pressure and rate of gastric emptying were also unaffected by variations in saliva nitrite concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

Nitrite in swallowed saliva does not modify gastro-esophageal junction function or predispose to gastro-esophageal reflux. The wide range in saliva nitrite concentrations, the sensitivity of the physiological recordings and the number of subjects studied make it very unlikely that an effect has been missed.

Is there an association between hiatal hernia and ineffective esophageal motility in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease?

INTRODUCTION

The pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease is multifactorial, where esophageal motility is one of the factors implicated in its genesis. However, there is still no consensus on the existence of an association between esophageal dysmotility and hiatal hernia in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. The objective of this study was to establish the prevalence of esophageal dysmotility in patients with hiatal hernia and to determine if herniation is a factor related to esophageal dysmotility in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

METHODS

The study included 356 patients with a clinical diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease submitted to upper digestive endoscopy and esophageal functional diagnostics. Hiatal hernia was defined endoscopically by a distance equal to or greater than 2 cm between the diaphragmatic constriction and the squamocolumnar junction and esophageal dysmotility when the esophageal manometry identified the amplitude of the peristaltic waves in the distal esophagus as <30 mmHg and/or less than 80% of effective contractions. For univariate statistical analysis, the patients were divided into two groups: with and without hiatal hernia. Poisson regression models were used to estimate crude and adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) of esophageal dysmotility according to hiatal hernia.

RESULTS

Gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with hiatal hernia had a prevalence of esophageal dysmotility equal to 14.8% and those without hiatal hernia, a prevalence of 7.7% (p = 0.041). Patients with hiatal hernia also showed a higher frequency of erosive esophagitis (47.5% versus 24.2%, p < 0.001), lower low esophageal sphincter pressure (10.4 versus 13.10; p < 0.001), and higher frequency of individuals with abnormal pH-metry values (p < 0.001). The crude PR for esophageal dysmotility, according to the presence of hiatal hernia, was 1.92 (confidence interval (CI), 1.04-3.53; p = 0.037), but this association did not persist when controlled for age, esophagitis, altered pH-metry, and altered low esophageal sphincter (adjusted PR, 1.69; CI, 0.68-4.15; p = 0.257).

CONCLUSION

Despite the prevalence of esophageal dysmotility in the hiatal hernia group being higher than that in the group without hiatal hernia, the association between these variables in individuals with gastroesophageal reflux disease disappeared when controlling for age, esophagitis, altered pH-metry, and altered low esophageal sphincter, leading us to believe that in these patients, hiatal hernia is not an independent risk factor for dysmotility.

Is there an association between hiatal hernia and ineffective esophageal motility in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease?

INTRODUCTION

The pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease is multifactorial, where esophageal motility is one of the factors implicated in its genesis. However, there is still no consensus on the existence of an association between esophageal dysmotility and hiatal hernia in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. The objective of this study was to establish the prevalence of esophageal dysmotility in patients with hiatal hernia and to determine if herniation is a factor related to esophageal dysmotility in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

METHODS

The study included 356 patients with a clinical diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease submitted to upper digestive endoscopy and esophageal functional diagnostics. Hiatal hernia was defined endoscopically by a distance equal to or greater than 2 cm between the diaphragmatic constriction and the squamocolumnar junction and esophageal dysmotility when the esophageal manometry identified the amplitude of the peristaltic waves in the distal esophagus as <30 mmHg and/or less than 80% of effective contractions. For univariate statistical analysis, the patients were divided into two groups: with and without hiatal hernia. Poisson regression models were used to estimate crude and adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) of esophageal dysmotility according to hiatal hernia.

RESULTS

Gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with hiatal hernia had a prevalence of esophageal dysmotility equal to 14.8% and those without hiatal hernia, a prevalence of 7.7% (p = 0.041). Patients with hiatal hernia also showed a higher frequency of erosive esophagitis (47.5% versus 24.2%, p < 0.001), lower low esophageal sphincter pressure (10.4 versus 13.10; p < 0.001), and higher frequency of individuals with abnormal pH-metry values (p < 0.001). The crude PR for esophageal dysmotility, according to the presence of hiatal hernia, was 1.92 (confidence interval (CI), 1.04-3.53; p = 0.037), but this association did not persist when controlled for age, esophagitis, altered pH-metry, and altered low esophageal sphincter (adjusted PR, 1.69; CI, 0.68-4.15; p = 0.257).

CONCLUSION

Despite the prevalence of esophageal dysmotility in the hiatal hernia group being higher than that in the group without hiatal hernia, the association between these variables in individuals with gastroesophageal reflux disease disappeared when controlling for age, esophagitis, altered pH-metry, and altered low esophageal sphincter, leading us to believe that in these patients, hiatal hernia is not an independent risk factor for dysmotility.

Outcome of nonerosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease patients with pathological acid exposure

AIM: To assess the management and outcome of nonerosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease (NERD) patients who were identified retrospectively, after a 5-year follow-up.

METHODS: We included patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms who had a negative endoscopy result and pathological 24-h esophageal pH-monitoring while off therapy. We interviewed them after an average period of 5 years (range 3.5-7 years) by means of a structured questionnaire to assess presence of GERD symptoms, related therapy, updated endoscopic data and other features. We assessed predictors of esophagitis development by means of univariate and multivariate statistical analysis.

RESULTS: 260 patients (137 women) were included. Predominant GERD symptoms were heartburn and regurgitation in 103/260 (40%). 70% received a maintenance treatment, which was proton pump inhibitor (PPI) in 55% of cases. An average number of 1.5 symptomatic relapses per patient/year of follow-up were observed. A progression to erosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease (ERD) was found in 58/193 (30.0%) of patients undergoing repeat endoscopy; 72% of these were Los Angeles grade A-B.

CONCLUSION: This study shows that progression to ERD occurs in about 5% of NERD cases per year, despite therapy. Only two factors consistently and independently influence progression: smoking and absence of PPI therapy.

The effect of hiatal hernia on gastroesophageal reflux disease and influence on proximal and distal esophageal reflux

INTRODUCTION

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a very common disorder that substantially affects the patient's quality of life.

AIM

Our aim was to detect the frequency of GERD in patients with hiatal hernia (HH), to compare the acid reflux pattern in patients with and without HH, and to search the relationship between the erosive gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and HH.

METHODS

Forty patients with HH diagnosed by at least two methods, and 121 patients with GERD as a control group were studied. The frequency of GERD in patients with HH, the acid reflux pattern, the relation of body mass index and erosive esophagitis with HH and control group was studied.

RESULTS

Among patients with HH 67.5% of patients had GER. On comparison of acid reflux pattern, the isolated distal esophageal reflux was seen more in patients with HH than in the control group (P < 0.0001). Erosive GERD was seen more in patients with HH than in the control group (P = 0.017). There was no difference in body mass indices between patients with HH and erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease and patients with HH and non-erosive GERD.

CONCLUSION

Hiatal hernia is very closely associated with GERD, and isolated distal esophageal reflux is seen more in patients with HH than in patients without HH. There is no effect of body mass index on GER in patients with HH.

Relationship of severity of gastroesophageal reflux disease with gastric acid secretory profile and esophageal acid exposure during nocturnal acid breakthrough: a study using 24-h dual-channel pH-metry

OBJECTIVE

In patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), refluxed gastric juice can damage the esophagus, and hence the more acidic the juice, the more the expected damage. Nocturnal acid breakthrough (NAB) is known to occur in GERD patients on treatment with proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs); however, whether this causes esophageal acidification and symptoms is controversial. The aims of this study were to investigate the relationship between gastric acid and the severity of GERD and the esophageal acidification and symptoms during NAB.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with GERD were evaluated using endoscopy (graded according to the Los Angeles (LA) classification), manometry and 24-h dual-channel pH-metry for esophageal and gastric acid profile and follow-up pH-metry while on PPIs for NAB.

RESULTS

In 61 patients (39.2+/-12.8 years, 40 M) the endoscopic grading was endoscopy negative (ENRD) in 19 (32%), endoscopic (ERD) in 40 (68%), (LA-A in 25, 42.4%, LA-B in12, 20.3%, peptic stricture in 2, 3.4%, and Barrett's esophagus in 1, 1.7%) and 2 patients were unclassified. Patients in the different groups had comparable gastric acid profiles, though esophageal acid exposure was different (LA-B and above versus ENRD, p=0.007; LA-B and above versus LA-A, p=0.003). Patients with NAB (7/18, 39%) had lower gastric pH than patients without NAB (p=0.003) though average esophageal pH and esophageal acid exposure were comparable. Frequency of nocturnal symptoms was comparable in patients with or without NAB (2/7 versus 3/11, p=NS). Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure was negatively correlated with average gastric pH.

CONCLUSIONS

Although severity of GERD is related to esophageal acid exposure, it does not correlate to gastric acid. No difference was found in esophageal acid exposure and nocturnal symptoms in patients with or without NAB.

Incidence of reflux esophagitis and Helicobacter pylori infection in diabetic patients

AIM: To investigate the incidence of reflux esophagitis (RE) and H pylori infection in the diabetic patient.

METHODS: The incidence of RE and H pylori infection were investigated in 85 patients with diabetes mellitus and the results were compared with controls.

RESULTS: The incidence of RE in diabetic patients was 17.6%. Although this tended to be higher in diabetic patients, there were no statistically significant differences between diabetic patients and controls. The incidence of H pylori infection in diabetic patients was 53.7% but no statistically significant difference was seen between diabetic patients and controls in the incidence of H pylori infection.

CONCLUSION: No significant differences could be seen between diabetic patients and controls in the incidence of RE and H pylori infection.

New algorithm for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is associated with a variety of typical and atypical symptoms. Patients often present in the first instance to a pharmacist or primary care physician and are subsequently referred to secondary care if initial management fails. Guidelines usually do not provide a clear guidance for all healthcare professionals with whom the patient may consult.

AIM

To update a 2002-treatment algorithm for GERD, making it more applicable to pharmacists as well as doctors.

METHODS

A panel of international experts met to discuss the principles and practice of treating GERD.

RESULTS

The updated algorithm for the management of GERD can be followed by pharmacists, for over-the-counter medications, primary care physicians, or secondary care gastroenterologists. The algorithm emphasizes the importance of life style changes to help control the triggers for heartburn and adjuvant therapies for rapid and adequate symptom relief. Proton pump inhibitors will remain a prominent treatment for GERD; however, the use of antacids and alginate-antacids (either alone or in combination with acid suppressants) is likely to increase.

CONCLUSION

The newly developed algorithm takes into account latest clinical practice experience, offering healthcare professionals clear and effective treatment options for the management of GERD.

Effects of age on the gastroesophageal junction, esophageal motility, and reflux disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The prevalence of complicated gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) increases with age; however, the mechanism by which this occurs is uncertain. This study assessed (1) whether physiologic degradation of the gastroesophageal junction and esophageal motility occurs with aging, and (2) whether these effects are associated with increased esophageal acid exposure and reflux symptoms in the elderly.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 1307 patients referred for investigations of reflux symptoms (median age, 49 years; range, 15-92 years) was conducted. Manometry assessed LES pressure, LES length, and esophageal peristalsis. Ambulatory pH studies assessed esophageal acid exposure (% time pH <4) during a period of 24 hours; reflux symptoms were assessed by validated questionnaire.

RESULTS

On multivariate regression, esophageal acid exposure was associated independently with decreasing LES pressure (P < .0001) and abdominal LES length (P < .0004). Dysmotility exacerbated reflux in the recumbent position (P < .004). Acid exposure increased with age (P < .0001), a 1.1%/24 hours (95% confidence interval, 0.4%-1.4%) increase in acid exposure every decade (more pronounced in the recumbent position). The age-related increase in acid exposure was associated independently with decreasing abdominal LES length (P < .001) and increasing dysmotility (P < 0.01). Reflux symptoms increased with acid exposure (P < .001); however, at any given level of exposure, symptom severity was less in the elderly (P < .006).

CONCLUSIONS

Age was associated with an increase in esophageal acid exposure; however, the severity of reflux symptoms reduced with age. These changes were associated with progressive decrease in abdominal LES length and esophageal motility. Increasing GERD severity in the elderly is related to degradation of the gastroesophageal junction and impaired esophageal clearance.

Is ineffective oesophageal motility associated with reflux oesophagitis?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between ineffective oesophageal motility and reflux oesophagitis controlling for hiatal hernia, hypotensive lower oesophageal sphincter and male sex in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

METHODS

A total of 387 patients with reflux disease (mean age, 46 years, 42% men) were consecutively selected from a database. All patients underwent upper endoscopy, oesophageal manometry and 24 h oesophageal pH-metry in accordance with a standardized protocol. Reflux disease was confirmed either by endoscopy (oesophagitis grade I-IV according to Savary-Miller) or by pH-metry (increased acid exposure). Hiatal hernia was diagnosed endoscopically, whereas ineffective oesophageal motility and hypotensive lower oesophageal sphincter were characterized during manometry testing. The association between ineffective oesophageal motility and reflux oesophagitis was assessed by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 166 patients with oesophagitis (mean age 45 years, 49% men) and 221 without oesophagitis (mean age 46 years, 37% men) were present. Prevalences of ineffective oesophageal motility, hiatal hernia, hypotensive lower oesophageal sphincter and male sex were significantly higher in patients with oesophagitis compared with those without oesophagitis (P<0.05). Ineffective oesophageal motility was independently associated with oesophagitis after multivariate logistic regression analysis (odds ratio=1.68; 95% confidence interval=1.04-2.70).

CONCLUSION

Ineffective oesophageal motility is associated with reflux oesophagitis, independently of hiatal hernia, hypotensive lower oesophageal sphincter and male sex.

Review article: the pathophysiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition that develops when the reflux of stomach contents causes troublesome symptoms and/or complications.

AIM

To review the current knowledge on the underlying factors contributing to GERD, with particular emphasis on the most recent research.

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted in Medline and EMBASE. The abstracts from recent large congresses were also reviewed to ensure coverage of the latest findings.

RESULTS

The pathophysiological factors causing GERD can be split into those inducing greater exposure of the oesophagus to stomach contents, and those that provide increased perception of reflux or increased mucosal damage. Transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations, which are likely to be triggered by gastric distension, appear to be a key physiological cause of GERD. Excessive reflux may also be provoked by impaired oesophageal or gastric clearance mechanisms. Pre-epithelial, epithelial and post-epithelial defences all normally protect the oesophagus from injury, and may be compromised in individuals with GERD. Heartburn could also be caused by oesophageal hypersensitivity as a result of visceral neural pathway dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

The pathophysiology of GERD is multifactorial, and abnormalities in the gastro-oesophageal junction, the stomach, the oesophagus and the nervous system may all contribute to this disease state.

Distinct clinical characteristics between patients with nonerosive reflux disease and those with reflux esophagitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

It has been postulated that nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) and erosive reflux disease (ERD) are 2 distinct entities of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics between patients with NERD and those with ERD.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited consecutive patients presenting with weekly attacks of heartburn or acid regurgitation. Exclusion criteria included gastric surgery, recent use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug or proton pump inhibitor, and peptic ulcer disease. Concomitant functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, and psychological disorders were documented. Endoscopy, esophageal manometry, acid perfusion test, and 24-hour ambulatory pH monitoring were performed. Risk factors of NERD were determined by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Two hundred fourteen patients (NERD, 113; ERD, 111) were studied. NERD patients were characterized by higher prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (36.3% vs 18%, P = .005), functional dyspepsia (64.6% vs 42.3%, P = .003), irritable bowel syndrome (44.2% vs 15.3%, P < .001), psychological disorders (9% vs 0.9%, P = .04), and positive acid perfusion test (40.7% vs 19.8%, P = .004). ERD patients had more hiatal hernias (35.1% vs 17.1%, P = .009), higher esophageal acid exposure (total time esophageal pH <4, 4.2% +/- 2.1% vs 5.9% +/- 2.3%; P = .01), and esophageal dysmotility (P < .05). With multivariate analysis, H pylori (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-3.2), irritable bowel syndrome (odds ratio, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.6-5.3), and positive acid perfusion test (odds ratio, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4-2.8) were independent risk factors for NERD.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with NERD and ERD have distinct differences in clinical characteristics. NERD is characterized by higher prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders and esophageal acid hypersensitivity.

Esophageal acid exposure in upright and recumbent postures: roles of lower esophageal sphincter, esophageal contractile and transport function, hiatal hernia, age, sex, and body mass

This study aimed to assess, using multiple regression analyses, the roles of lower esophageal sphincter, esophageal contractile and transport function, hiatal hernia, age, sex, and body mass for esophageal acid exposure in upright and recumbent postures and for esophagitis. In 116 patients with reflux symptoms, acid exposure was recorded by 24-hr pH monitoring, motility manometrically, bolus transport scintigraphically, hiatal hernia and esophagitis endoscopically. In upright posture, the percentage time at pH <4 increased significantly with higher body mass index and lower distal esophageal amplitude, the number of episodes >5 min at pH <4 with lower distal amplitude, slower transport, and higher body mass, and the longest episode at pH <4 with lower distal amplitude. In recumbency, the percentage time at pH <4 increased with lower percentage of effective esophageal contraction waves and male sex, and the number of episodes and the longest episode with lower percentage effective waves. The severity of esophagitis augmented with slower supine transport and male sex. In both postures, acid exposure and esophagitis seem to be determined primarily by impaired esophageal motility and the ensuing slow bolus transport rather than by compromised lower esophageal sphincter function and the presence and size of a hiatal hernia.

Effect of rabeprazole and omeprazole on the onset of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptom relief during the first seven days of treatment

OBJECTIVE

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) symptoms have a significant impact on patients' well-being. Onset of symptom relief is therefore an important consideration in GORD treatment. The primary objective was to compare the efficacy of rabeprazole (20 mg) and omeprazole (20 mg) regarding onset of heartburn control during the first 7 days of treatment in patients with erosive oesophagitis. Secondary objectives included maintenance of sustained heartburn control, control of other GORD symptoms (e.g. acid regurgitation, epigastric pain, dysphagia), effect on quality of life, patient satisfaction with treatment, and adverse events.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this multicentre, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, comparative study, performed in Europe and Iceland, patients with endoscopically confirmed erosive oesophagitis were randomized to receive once-daily treatment with rabeprazole 20 mg (n=358) or omeprazole 20 mg (n=359) for 7 days. Symptoms were recorded (scored on a 5-point Likert scale) twice daily by the patients on their diary cards.

RESULTS

Median time to reach heartburn control was 1.5 days for both the rabeprazole and omeprazole groups (p<0.43). The results were similar between treatments for other study parameters. Both treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike previous studies, no significant differences were found between treatments with rabeprazole (20 mg) and omeprazole (20 mg) in this study. Further studies are needed to evaluate the potential benefit of fast-acting proton-pump inhibitors, such as rabeprazole, with respect to onset of symptom control in erosive GORD.

Pathophysiological characteristics of the various forms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Spectrum disease or distinct phenotypic presentations?

BACKGROUND

The traditional approach to gastro-oesophageal reflux disease as a spectrum disease has recently been criticised and the distinct phenotypic presentations model has been proposed.

AIM

To evaluate the main pathophysiological characteristics of various gastro-oesophageal reflux disease presentations.

METHODS

Oesophageal manometry and 24-h pH-monitoring were performed in a gastro-oesophageal reflux disease series collected in a 7-year period.

RESULTS

Four hundred and twenty-one subjects were studied. Mean total percentage acid reflux time was significantly higher in long-segment Barrett's oesophagus and in ulcerative oesophagitis than in all the other gastro-oesophageal reflux disease groups, whilst in short-segment Barrett's oesophagus results were quite similar to those found in non-erosive reflux disease and in erosive reflux disease. Patients with ulcerative oesophagitis and long-segment Barrett's oesophagus were older than all the other gastro-oesophageal reflux disease groups. The mean lower oesophageal sphincter pressure was significantly reduced in non-erosive reflux disease, erosive reflux disease, ulcerative oesophagitis, short-segment Barrett's oesophagus and long-segment Barrett's oesophagus as compared with functional heartburn and hypersensitive oesophagus and with controls.

CONCLUSIONS

In keeping with the spectrum model of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, severity of acid reflux increases from non-erosive reflux disease through erosive reflux disease up to ulcerative oesophagitis and long-segment Barrett's oesophagus. Ulcerative oesophagitis and long-segment Barrett's oesophagus could represent an advanced step in the natural history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Our results do not confirm the distinct phenotypic presentations hypothesis.

Gastroesophageal reflux and gastric emptying, revisited

Total gastric emptying is delayed in 10% to 33% of adult patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but a strong correlation between duration of gastric emptying and severity of acid reflux or esophagitis has never been proved. Previous studies reported that patients with GERD might have exaggerated postprandial fundus relaxation with retention of food and triggering of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs). There is a positive correlation between postprandial fundus relaxation and number of TLESRs and also between proximal gastric emptying and esophageal acid exposure. However, new studies suggest that a high number of TLESRs and reflux events may occur even with accelerated gastric emptying, and prolonged gastric retention might be associated with less rather than more esophageal acid exposure. Using simultaneous gastric emptying and esophageal pH impedance we found that the rate of gastric emptying might determine the acidity and proximal extent of reflux: The slower the emptying, the higher the pH and proximal extent of the refluxate.

Recent developments in the pathophysiology and therapy of gastroesophageal reflux disease and nonerosive reflux disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a very common disorder. Proton pump inhibitors are the highly successful mainstay of medical gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment. However, some limitations of proton pump inhibitor therapy continue to drive studies that aim at better understanding and managing manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease. This review summarizes recent progress in our understanding of the pathophysiology and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have demonstrated a potential role of increased gastric acid secretion in gastroesophageal reflux disease, a factor largely neglected during the last decade. Failure to respond adequately to proton pump inhibitor therapy has been attributed to diagnostic inaccuracy, to nocturnal acid breakthrough, to ongoing non-acid reflux and to esophageal hypersensitivity. The relevance of nocturnal acid breakthrough has been recently challenged. Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations are a major mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux disease; inhibition of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations is a potentially important therapeutic target. Recent studies have focused on GABA receptor stimulation using baclofen or sodium valproate. The role of esophageal body peristalsis in the clearance of reflux events has been questioned. Endoscopic antireflux therapies aim at perendoscopic reinforcement of the antireflux barrier as a novel therapeutic approach to gastroesophageal reflux disease. At present, long-term and controlled data are scarce. Recent observations have challenged the long-term efficacy of surgical antireflux therapy.

SUMMARY

Increased understanding of the pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease may lead to new or improved treatments. Major advances have been made in the role of gastric acid secretion, the control of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and mechanisms underlying esophageal hypersensitivity. Recent studies have highlighted some shortcomings of proton pump inhibitor therapy and of antireflux surgery. Novel approaches are treatments aimed at decreasing transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and endoscopic antireflux procedures. Large-scale controlled studies are lacking for both treatments.

The surgical treatment of gastro-esophageal reflux in neonates and infants

Gastro-esophageal reflux (GER) is a physiological process characterized by the involuntary passage of gastric contents into the lower esophagus not induced by noxious stimuli. It represents a common condition in preterm infants and may occur in healthy neonates. The phenomenon is only considered as GER disease when it causes the patient to be symptomatic or results in pathological complications. Fundoplication is recommended in symptomatic neonates and infants with GER that does not respond to medical treatment. The presence of respiratory symptoms related to GER is the primary indication for fundoplication in this selected population. The Nissen fundoplication is the antireflux procedure of choice and the experience concerning other procedures, including laparoscopic techniques, is limited in this age group. The best results are achieved in newborn infants with isolated GER, as the recurrence rate of GER in infants with associated anomalies is high. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the benefit of laparoscopic fundoplication in this age group.

Composite score of reflux symptoms in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease

AIM: To evaluate the significance of the composite score of reflux symptoms in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and to determine the relationship of the composite score with reflux esophagitis (RE) and pathological gastroesophageal reflux (PGER).

METHODS: Upper digestive endoscopy and /or 24-h esophageal pH monitoring were performed in 244 subjects. Of these, 54 were consecutive patients attending our clinic with symptoms suggestive of GERD, and 190 were randomly selected from 2532 respondents who participated in our previous general population-based study on GERD. A standardized questionnaire was used to classify both the frequency and severity of typical symptoms of GERD (heartburn, acid and food regurgitation) using a 4-score scale, and the composite score of main reflux symptoms (score index: SI, range from 0 to 18) were calculated for every subject. RE was diagnosed according to the Savary-Miller criteria. Subjects with abnormal pH-metry (DeMeester score more than 14.7) were considered to have PGER. GERD patients were defined as the subjects with RE and/or PGER.

RESULTS: The sensitivity of SI in the diagnosis of GERD was inversely associated with SI, but the specificity tended to increase with increased SI. With the cut-off of 8, the SI achieved the highest accuracy of 70.0%, with a sensitivity of 78.6% and a specificity of 69.2% in diagnosing GERD, followed by the cut-off of 3, which had an accuracy of 62.1%, a sensitivity of 96.4% and a specificity of 34.6%. The prevalence of RE, PGER and GERD was strongly associated with increased SI (P < 0.01), but there was no significant association between the severity of RE and SI (P > 0.05). Among patients with RE, 69.2% had PGER, and 30.8% were confirmed to have negative findings of pH monitoring. Among patients with PGER, 52.9% were identified to have RE and 47.1% had negative endscopic findings in esophagus.

CONCLUSION: According to the composite score of main reflux symptoms, the diagnosis of GERD can be made without further tests in most cases. However, 24-h esophageal pH monitoring and upper digestive endoscopy are still indicated in patients with mild and atypical symptoms.

Pathophysiology of GERD in China: the same factors at a lower scale

Most of the factors involved in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), previously described in European, Australian, and American studies, are present in Chinese patients with GERD, but at a lower scale. The acidity of gastric contents is reduced either spontaneously or by Helicobater pylori infection. A low-fat diet probably contributes to a more favorable gastric distribution of the meals, reduced obesity, and lowers the number of TLESRs. The prevalence of hiatal hernia is low and esophageal motility disorders are moderate. Like in Western countries, the pathophysiology of GERD in China is multifactorial, with variable combination of moderate abnormalities in individual patients, leading to milder forms of GERD.

The role of the hiatus hernia in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

A sliding hiatus hernia disrupts both the anatomy and physiology of the normal antireflux mechanism. It reduces lower oesophageal sphincter length and pressure, and impairs the augmenting effects of the diaphragmatic crus. It is associated with decreased oesophageal peristalsis, increases the cross-sectional area of the oesophago-gastric junction, and acts as a reservoir allowing reflux from the hernia sac into the oesophagus during swallowing. The overall effect is that of increased oesophageal acid exposure. The presence of a hiatus hernia is associated with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux, increased prevalence and severity of reflux oesophagitis, as well as Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. The efficacy of treatment with proton pump inhibitors is reduced. Our view on the significance of the sliding hiatus hernia in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease has changed enormously in recent decades. It was initially thought that a hiatus hernia had to be present for reflux oesophagitis to occur. Subsequently, the hiatus hernia was considered an incidental finding of little consequence. We now appreciate that the hiatus hernia has major patho-physiological effects favouring gastro-oesophageal reflux and hence contributing to oesophageal mucosal injury, particularly in patients with severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and the status of gastric acid secretion in patients with Barrett's esophagus in Japan

OBJECTIVES

The acidity of the refluxate into the esophagus is a key factor for the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection can influence gastric acid secretion. We have reported that H. pylori infection prevents reflux esophagitis by decreasing gastric acid secretion in Japanese patients, but the role of this organism in Barrett's esophagus is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of H. pylori infection and gastric acid secretion in Japanese patients with reflux esophagitis with or without Barrett's esophagus.

METHODS

We enrolled 112 reflux esophagitis patients who were examined for the status of H. pylori and acid secretion in this study. They were divided into three groups, according to the presence or absence of Barrett's esophagus as follows: reflux esophagitis group without Barrett's esophagus (reflux esophagitis alone) (80 patients); short-segment Barrett's esophagus group (16 patients); and long-segment Barrett's esophagus group (LSBE) (16 patients). Age- and sex-matched control subjects were also assigned to the 80 patients with reflux esophagitis alone. The prevalence of H. pylori infection was determined by histology, rapid urease tests, and serum IgG antibodies. Gastric acid secretion was evaluated by the endoscopic gastrin test (EGT).

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of H. pylori infection in the reflux esophagitis patient group (24.1%) was significantly lower than the control group (71.2%) (odds ratio 0.13, 95% confidence interval 0.07-0.24; p < 0.0001). The prevalence of H. pylori infection in the patients with Barrett's esophagus tended to be lower than that in the patients with reflux esophagitis alone (reflux esophagitis alone; 30.0%, SSBE; 18.7%, LSBE; 0%), especially in the patients with LSBE compared with the reflux esophagitis alone group (p < 0.01). The EGT value of the respective reflux esophagitis patient group was significantly higher than the control group. The EGT value in the patients with Barrett's esophagus tended to be higher than that in the patients with reflux esophagitis alone, but the difference was not statistically significant. When examined in H. pylori-negative subjects, no difference was found in the EGT value between the control subjects and the patients with reflux esophagitis alone, but it was significantly higher in patients with Barrett's esophagus than the control subjects (p < 0.05). On the other hand, when examined in the H. pylori-positive subjects, the EGT value was significantly higher in the patients with reflux esophagitis alone than in the control subjects (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

H. pylori infection may play a protective role in the development of Barrett's esophagus, especially in the development of LSBE in Japan. Gastric acid hypersecretion may be concerned with the development of Barrett's esophagus in addition to the absence of H. pylori infection.

Gastric acid normosecretion is not essential in the pathogenesis of mild erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease in relation to Helicobacter pylori status

In the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), gastric acid is considered to be one of the most important factors, but little is known about the degree of gastric acid secretion in GERD patients. In this study, we evaluated it in GERD patients and control subjects by 24-h intragastric pH, and serological and histological investigations, in relation to Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) status. In H. pylori-negative GERD patients gastric acid secretion was similar to that in H. pylori-negative control subjects. In H. pylori-positive GERD patients, in particular, mild GERD patients, it decreased significantly compared to that in H. pylori-negative control subjects, but the degree of decrease was smaller than in H. pylori-positive control subjects. Results of serological and histological evaluation were supportive. In conclusion, in some GERD patients, gastric acid secretion was significantly decreased. Increased or maintained gastric acid secretion was not essential in the pathogenesis of mild GERD.

Natural history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: the neglected factor

The natural history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is still a matter for research. The follow-up of GORD patients under placebo and after suspension of the drugs that healed the disease, along with observations of large patient populations treated with, or without, antisecretory drugs for long periods of time, may give some information on the spontaneous evolution of the disease. To single out the outcome of each patient, predictive factors based on demographic, morphologic and pathophysiologic characteristics have been devised, but their reliability is debatable. The reason for their many discrepancies could lie in the fact that, to date, the large majority of investigators have focused their research on the characteristics of gastro-oesophageal reflux and underlying motor activity, and have overlooked the resistance of the oesophageal mucosa. As many studies have shown that the severity of GORD is not proportional to the amount of reflux, we strongly believe that knowledge of the capacity of the mucosa to resist injury and repair the damage is the key to understanding why patients with low reflux may have severe disease, while patients with high reflux may not. Research on the kind and degree of mucosal defects in patients with GORD should receive more attention and because it may help to clarify the laws that govern the GORD evolution.

Different patterns of oesophageal acid exposure distinguish complicated reflux disease from either erosive reflux oesophagitis or non-erosive reflux disease

BACKGROUND

The reason why less than one-half of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease develop complicated reflux disease (ulcerative oesophagitis, oesophageal strictures and Barrett's oesophagus) and erosive reflux oesophagitis is not fully understood. Supine nocturnal oesophageal acid reflux is considered to be critically involved in this phenomenon, but reliable data are lacking.

AIM

To clarify whether high levels of supine nocturnal oesophageal acid exposure are associated with complicated reflux disease.

METHODS

Ambulatory 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring was performed in 220 patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (56 with complicated reflux disease, 76 with erosive reflux oesophagitis and 88 with non-erosive reflux disease). The total, supine nocturnal and upright diurnal percentage acid reflux times were calculated.

RESULTS

The total percentage acid reflux time was significantly greater in complicated reflux disease than in either erosive reflux oesophagitis (P = 0.024) or non-erosive reflux disease (P = 0.000). These differences were entirely due to a greater supine nocturnal percentage acid reflux time (P = 0.038 and P = 0.000, respectively), whereas no difference was observed in the upright diurnal percentage acid reflux time.

CONCLUSIONS

Complicated reflux disease is characterized by high levels of supine nocturnal percentage acid reflux time. Prospective studies would be appropriate to clarify whether the normalization of this parameter is relevant to the effective management of this subset of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Circadian pattern of intragastric acidity in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)

BACKGROUND

Most patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease have non-erosive reflux disease. Proton pump inhibitors are less effective than expected in these patients, but no previous study has measured their 24-h gastric pH values.

AIMS

To evaluate whether there are differences in 24-h intragastric acidity between reflux patients with and without oesophagitis and controls. The influence of Helicobacter pylori on the gastric pH of reflux patients was also assessed.

METHODS

Sixty-three consecutive patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms who agreed to undergo endoscopy and 24-h pH-metry were recruited. Twenty-five (39%) had erosive oesophagitis and 38 (61%) did not. H. pylori was diagnosed by CLO test, histology and 13C-urea breath test. Gastric pH was also measured in 30 controls without digestive symptoms.

RESULTS

H. pylori was found in seven of the 25 (28%) patients with oesophagitis and 14 of the 38 (37%) patients with non-erosive reflux disease. Oesophageal pH-metry was abnormal in 21 of the 25 (84%) patients with oesophagitis and in 32 of the 38 (84%) patients with non-erosive reflux disease. The median gastric pH did not differ between patients with and without oesophagitis or between them and controls during the 24 h (P = 0.8) and other time intervals (P = 0.2-0.4). The gastric pH did not differ between infected and non-infected patients with oesophagitis (P = 0.2-0.4) or non-erosive reflux disease (P = 0.3-0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

The circadian pattern of intragastric acidity does not differ between patients with non-erosive reflux disease and oesophagitis. Moreover, the study confirms that H. pylori infection does not affect the gastric pH in either group of reflux patients.

Postprandial Acid Reflux is Reduced by Delayed Gastric Emptying

The aim of this study was to investigate influence of delayed gastric emptying on postprandial reflux in esophageal pH. Sixty-nine consecutive patients underwent 24 hour (h) esophageal pH monitoring and gastric emptying. In 24 h esophageal pH monitoring, % postprandial reflux pH<4 for 2 h after each meal (% PRT) was extracted from the 24 h pH profile. After solid test meal (1 mCi, Tc99m) was given, gastric emptying was measured with a gamma detector placed transnasally 5 cm below lower esophageal sphincter. % PRT was similar among the 34 normal, 26 delayed and 9 rapid gastric emptying rate patients. Thirty-five with a positive pH study and 34 with a negative had a similar prevalence of gastric emptying disorder. In the positive pH study group, patients with normal gastric emptying had significantly higher % PRT than those with delayed gastric emptying (22.0 vs 12.1%, P<0.05). In the same population, patients with a normal %PRT had a significantly higher prevalence of delayed gastric emptying compared with those with a positive % PRT (6/8 vs 9/27, P<0.05). In patient with abnormal acid exposure but normal % PRT on 24 h esophageal pH monitoring, gastric emptying may be delayed.

Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux and gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux is a physiological phenomenon, occurring with different severity and duration in different individuals. Reflux occurs when this normal event results in the occurrence of symptoms/signs or complications. The pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux is complex and diverse, since it is influenced by factors that are genetic, environmental (e.g., diet smoking), anatomic, hormonal, and neurogenic. However, many mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Future research should focus on a better understanding of the physiology of the upper and lower esophageal sphincters, and of gastric motility. The afferent and efferent neural pathways and neuropharmacologic mediators of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and gastric dysmotility require further study. The role of anatomic malformations such as hiatal hernia in children has been underestimated. While therapeutic possibilities are greater in number and largely improved, the outcomes of some treatments are far from satisfactory in many cases. In addition to development of new forms of treatment, research should address better use of currently available medical and surgical treatments.

Review article: gastro-oesophageal reflux disease--pathophysiological issues of clinical relevance

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is a multifactorial disorder in which the pathophysiological mechanisms are variably combined in different patients. Motor dysfunction of the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) and, possibly, the proximal stomach is a major cause of the increase in the number of reflux episodes. Transient LOS relaxation is the main mechanism of reflux in many patients with endoscopically negative disease, whereas a hypotensive LOS becomes relevant only in patients with oesophagitis. Alterations in primary and secondary peristalsis contribute to the increased oesophageal acid exposure by delaying clearance. The presence of a hiatus hernia, especially when voluminous and/or non-reducible, increases the number of reflux episodes by mechanically weakening the oesophago-gastric junction, and impairs oesophageal clearance. Hypersensitivity to acid is often present and contributes to the clinical manifestations of the disease, whereas oesophageal hypersensitivity, both to chemical and mechanical stimuli, plays a predominant role in a subset of patients. Increased concentrations of noxious compounds in the oesophageal refluxate may contribute to the development of anatomical lesions, but this is still a matter for debate. The clinical relevance of Helicobacter pylori infection and of mucosal defensive factors still needs to be fully elucidated.

Gastric emptying and duodeno-gastro-oesophageal reflux in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Previous studies present conflicting results regarding relationship between gastric emptying and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Reflux of duodenal content to oesophagus is generally considered to be associated with more severe disease.

AIM

To assess presence of a gastric emptying disorder in persons with reflux of duodenal contents to oesophagus and to identify any correlation with gastric emptying and oesophageal motility.

METHODOLOGY

A total of 15 subjects with (B+) and 15 subjects without (B-) bile reflux to oesophagus determined by 24-hour bilirubin monitoring were studied with scintigraphic solid gastric emptying and 24-hour oesophageal manometry.

RESULTS

There was no difference in lag phase [median 23.7 (range 10.8-44.0) vs 24.6 (8.1-40.1) min], half emptying time [74.6 (48.0-93.6) vs 82.8 (54.4-153.9) min] or emptying rate [0.89 (0.59-1.34) vs 0.83 (0.36-1. 15)%/min] for B- and B+ subjects, respectively. In addition, there was no difference in emptying rate of gastric fundus between B- and B+ subjects. Subjects with bile reflux had less effective oesophageal contractions of oesophageal body [9.4(3.3-37)%] compared to subjects without bile reflux [32(19-47)%, p = 0.002]. However, there was no correlation between oesophageal motility and gastric emptying.

CONCLUSION

Results suggest that a gastric emptying disorder is a less likely contributing cause of bile reflux to the oesophagus, but bile reflux is associated with less effective oesophageal motility.

Prolonged measurement of lower oesophageal sphincter function in patients with intestinal metaplasia at the oesophagogastric junction

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

It has been shown that gastro-oesophageal reflux plays a role in the pathogenesis of intestinal metaplasia (IM) limited to the oesophagogastric junction (OGJ), similar to the pathogenesis of IM in long segments of columnar lined oesophagus. The aim of this study was to examine lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) function by means of prolonged recording in patients with IM limited to a normal appearing OGJ.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighteen patients with IM at the OGJ (five females, 13 males; mean age 55.4 years) and 22 patients without IM (nine females, 13 males; mean age 53.9 years) underwent conventional stationary oesophageal manometry. Thereafter, seven hour water perfused manometry with simultaneous pH measurement (probe 5 cm proximal to the LOS) was performed. Swallowing was monitored with a pharyngeal sidehole and LOS pressure was recorded with a Dent sleeve. Patients were studied in the fasted state (three hours) and after a standardised meal (four hours). LOS pressure was analysed using customised software, and the incidence of reflux episodes (pH <4 for at least five seconds) and transient LOS relaxations (TLOSRs) were examined. TLOSRs were judged to be accompanied by reflux if a decrease of 1 pH unit occurred during relaxation.

RESULTS

Patients with IM at the OGJ had a higher prevalence of postprandial acid reflux compared with patients without IM. No differences were observed in LOS pressure (pre- and postprandially) or in the prevalence of TLOSRs. However, in the postprandial phase, the rate of TLOSRs accompanied by acid reflux was increased in patients with IM.

CONCLUSION

Patients with IM at the OGJ have a higher prevalence of postprandial acid reflux. This is not associated with a higher prevalence of TLOSRs or a decreased LOS pressure but with a higher rate of TLOSRs accompanied by reflux.

Gastroesophageal reflux and aspiration of gastric contents in anesthetic practice

General anesthesia may predispose patients to aspiration of gastroesophageal contents because of depression of protective reflexes during loss of consciousness. In addition, some patients may be at increased risk of pulmonary aspiration because of retention of gastric contents caused by pain, inadequate starvation, or gastrointestinal pathology resulting in reduced gastric emptying and gastroesophageal reflux. Despite increasing knowledge of the problems associated with aspiration, the relatively small incidence and associated mortality rates in the perioperative period do not appear to have changed markedly over the last few decades. In this review article, the physiological factors associated with an increased risk of gastroesophageal reflux and aspiration are considered together with some of the methods that are used to prevent aspiration. In particular, preoperative starvation, the use of drugs designed to increase gastric pH, recent developments in airway devices, and appropriate application of cricoid pressure are critically appraised.