Diffuse oesophageal spasm: diagnosis by ambulatory 24 hour manometry

Comparison of the efficacy of diltiazem versus fluoxetine in the treatment of distal esophageal spasm: A randomized-controlled-trial

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM

Distal esophageal spasm is an uncommon esophageal motility disorder presenting with non-cardiac chest pain and dysphagia. The main goal of therapy is symptom relief with pharmacologic, endoscopic, and surgical therapies. Pharmacologic treatment is less invasive and is the preferred method of choice. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of diltiazem versus fluoxetine in the treatment of distal esophageal spasm.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 125 patients with distal esophageal spasm diagnosed using endoscopy, barium esophagogram, and manometry were evaluated. Patients were divided into diltiazem and fluoxetine groups and received a 2-month trial of diltiazem + omeprazole or fluoxetine + omeprazole, respectively. Of 125 patients, 55 were lost to follow up and 70 were eligible for final analysis. Clinical signs and symptoms were assessed before and after therapy using four validated questionnaires: Eckardt score, short form-36, heartburn score, and the hospital anxiety and depression scale.

RESULTS

Both regimens significantly relieved symptoms (a decrease in mean Eckardt score of 2.57 and 3.18 for diltiazem and fluoxetine groups, respectively; and a decrease in mean heartburn score by 0.89 and 1.03 for diltiazem and fluoxetine groups, respectively). Patients' quality of life improved based on short form-36 (an increase in mean score of 2.37 and 3.95 for fluoxetine and diltiazem groups, respectively). There was no relationship between patients' improvement and severity of symptoms. Psychological findings based on the hospital anxiety and depression scale were inconsistent (a decrease in mean of 0.143 and 0.57 for fluoxetine and diltiazem groups, respectively; p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Fluoxetine and diltiazem were effective for clinical symptom relief in patients with distal esophageal spasm, but were not promising for improving psychological symptoms. Neither regimen was superior in terms of efficacy. Consequently, it is key to consider side effects and comorbidities when choosing a therapy.

Diagnostic yield of 24-hour esophageal manometry in non-cardiac chest pain

BACKGROUND

In the past, ambulatory 24-h manometry has been shown useful for the evaluation of patients with non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP). With the diagnostic improvements brought by pH-impedance monitoring and high-resolution manometry (HRM), the contribution of ambulatory 24-h manometry to the diagnosis of esophageal hypertensive disorders has become uncertain. Our aim was to assess the additional diagnostic yield of ambulatory manometry to HRM and ambulatory pH-impedance monitoring in this patient population.

METHODS

All patients underwent 24-h ambulatory pressure-pH-impedance monitoring and HRM. Patients had retrosternal pain as a predominant symptom and no explanation after cardiologic and digestive endoscopic evaluations. Diagnostic measurements were analyzed by two independent physicians.

KEY RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria; 37.3% of the patients had their symptoms explained by abnormalities on pH-impedance monitoring and 6.8% by ambulatory manometry. Functional chest pain was diagnosed in 52.5% of the patients. High-resolution manometry, using the Chicago Classification v3.0 criteria alone, did not identify any of the four patients with esophageal spasm on ambulatory manometry. However, taking into account other abnormalities, such as simultaneous (rapid) or repetitive contractions, HRM had a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 98.2% for the diagnosis of esophageal spasm.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

In the work-up of NCCP, ambulatory 24-h manometry has a low additional diagnostic yield. However, it remains the best technique to identify esophageal spasm as the cause of symptoms. This is particularly useful when an unequivocal diagnosis is needed before treatment.

High-Resolution Manometry in Clinical Practice

High-resolution manometry (HRM) is the primary method used to evaluate esophageal motor function. Displayed and interpreted by esophageal pressure topography (EPT), HRM/ EPT provides a detailed assessment of esophageal function that is useful in the evaluation of patients with nonobstructive dysphagia and before foregut surgery. Esophageal motility diagnoses are determined systematically by applying objective metrics of esophageal sphincter and peristaltic function to the Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders. This article discusses HRM study, EPT interpretation, and the translation of EPT findings into clinical practice. Examples are provided to illustrate several clinical challenges.

Botulinum toxin reduces Dysphagia in patients with nonachalasia primary esophageal motility disorders

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin (BTX) has shown benefits for patients with diffuse esophageal spasm (DES) and nutcracker esophagus (NE) in small uncontrolled trials. We investigated the effect of BTX on symptoms of patients with DES or NE and assessed manometry findings in a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled study.

METHODS

We assessed 22 patients with dysphagia-predominant, manometry-confirmed DES or NE (6 men; age, 63 ± 2 y) at a tertiary care medical center. Patients were given injections of BTX (8 × 12.5 U) or saline (8 × 0.5 mL) in 4 quadrants, at 2 and 7 cm above the esophagogastric junction. After 1 month, patients crossed over between groups and received endoscopic injections of BTX or saline. When the study began and 4 weeks after each injection, the patients were assessed by esophageal manometry and completed a symptom questionnaire (to determine solid and liquid dysphagia, chest pain, and regurgitation and heartburn; all scored 0-4). Responders were defined based on modified Vantrappen criteria for achalasia.

RESULTS

After BTX injections, patients had significant decreases in total symptom scores (sum of solid and liquid dysphagia and chest pain; from 7.6 ± 0.7 to 4.8 ± 0.8; P = .01); this decrease was not observed in patients who received saline injections. Moreover, BTX injection stabilized unintentional weight loss (weight gain of 0.3 ± 0.3 after BTX injection vs further weight loss of 1.6 ± 0.5 kg after saline injection; P = .01). Fifty percent of patients had a response 1 month after BTX injection, compared with 10% after saline injection (P = .04); 30% still had a response 1 year after BTX injection. BTX injection also caused a significant decrease in the mean esophagogastric junction pressure, compared with baseline (15.8 ± 1.7 vs 24.0 ± 2.8 mm Hg; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

In a prospective controlled study of patients with DES and NE, injections of BTX reduced symptoms and stabilized unintentional weight loss.

TRIAL REGISTRY

http://www.targid.eu, ML2669, ML6294.

Management of spastic disorders of the esophagus

The concept of esophageal spastic disorders encompasses spastic achalasia, distal esophageal spasm, and jackhammer esophagus. These are conceptually distinct in that spastic achalasia and distal esophageal spasm are characterized by a loss of neural inhibition, whereas jackhammer esophagus is associated with hypercontractility. Hypercontractility may also occur as a result of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction or inflammation. The diagnosis of jackhammer esophagus as a primary motility disorder is based on the characteristic manometric findings after ruling out mechanical obstruction and eosinophilic esophagitis. Despite the differences in pathophysiology among the esophageal spastic disorders, their management is similar.

The Chicago criteria for esophageal motility disorders: what has changed in the past 5 years?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The Chicago Classification for esophageal motility disorders was developed to complement the enhanced characterization of esophageal motility provided by high-resolution esophageal pressure topography (HREPT) as this new technology has emerged within clinical practice. This review aims to summarize the evidence supporting the evolution of the classification scheme since its inception.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies examining the specific esophageal motility disorders in regards to HREPT metrics, clinical characteristics, and responses to treatments have facilitated updates of the diagnostic scheme and criteria. These studies have demonstrated variation in treatment responses associated with subclassification of achalasia, the use of distal latency in the diagnosis of distal esophageal spasm, and the development of diagnoses including esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction and hypercontractile esophagus.

SUMMARY

The diagnostic criteria described in the Chicago Classification have evolved to demonstrate a greater focus on distinct clinical phenotypes. Future evaluation of the natural history and treatment outcomes will assist in further refinement of this diagnostic scheme and management of esophageal motility disorders.

Functional aspects of distal oesophageal spasm: the role of onset velocity and contraction amplitude on bolus transit

BACKGROUND

Distal oesophageal spasm is a rare and under-investigated motility abnormality. Recent studies indicate effective bolus transit in varying percentages of distal oesophageal spasm patients.

AIM

Explore functional aspects including contraction onset velocity and contraction amplitude cut-off values for simultaneous contractions to predict complete bolus transit.

METHODS

We re-examined data from 107 impedance-manometry recordings with a diagnosis of distal oesophageal spasm. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was conducted, regarding effects of onset velocity on bolus transit taking into account distal oesophageal amplitude and correcting for intra-individual repeated measures.

RESULTS

Mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for saline and viscous swallows were 0.84±0.05 and 0.84±0.04, respectively. Velocity criteria of >30 cm/s when distal oesophageal amplitude>100 mmHg and 8 cm/s when distal oesophageal amplitude<100 mmHg for saline and 32cm/s when distal oesophageal amplitude>100 mmHg and >7 cm/s when distal oesophageal amplitude<100 mmHg for viscous had a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 80% to identify complete bolus transit. Using these criteria, final diagnosis changed in 44.9% of patients. Abnormal bolus transit was observed in 50.9% of newly diagnosed distal oesophageal spasm patients versus 7.5% of patients classified as normal. Distal oesophageal spasm patients with distal oesophageal amplitude>100 mmHg suffered twice as often from chest pain than those with distal oesophageal amplitude<100 mmHg.

CONCLUSION

The proposed velocity cut-offs for diagnosing distal oesophageal spasm improve the ability to identify patients with spasm and abnormal bolus transit.

Diffuse esophageal spasm: has the term lost its relevance? Analysis of 217 cases

Diffuse esophageal spasm (DES) has been reported as a potential cause of dysphagia or chest pain; however, the patho-physiology of DES is unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the manometric correlates of dysphagia and chest pain in this patient population. All patients undergoing manometry at our institution are entered into a prospectively maintained database. After institutional review board approval, the database was queried to identify patients meeting criteria for DES (≥20% simultaneous waves with greater than 30 mm Hg pressure in the distal esophagus). The patient-reported symptoms and manometric data, along with the results of a 24-hour pH study (if done), were extracted for further analysis. Out of 4923 patients, 240 (4.9%) met the manometric criteria for DES. Of these, 217 patients had complete manometry data along with at least one reported symptom. Of the patients with DES, 159 (73.3%) had dysphagia or chest pain as a reported symptom. Patients reporting either dysphagia or chest pain had significantly higher lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure than patients without these symptoms (P= 0.007). Significant association was noted between reported dysphagia and percentage of simultaneous waves. Chest pain did not correlate with percent of simultaneous waves, mean amplitude of peristalsis, or 24-hour pH score. The origin of reported chest pain in patients with DES is not clear but may be related to higher LES pressure. Simultaneous waves were associated with reported dysphagia. Using current diagnostic criteria, the term DES has no clinical relevance.

Has high-resolution manometry changed the approach to esophageal motility disorders?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

High-resolution manometry (HRM) coupled with high-resolution esophageal topography plots (HREPT) has dramatically changed the paradigm of manometric studies. The purpose of the current review is to discuss the salient advantages of HRM that are likely to change the clinical practice of manometry.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies evaluating HRM suggest a significant improvement in the sensitivity for the diagnosis of achalasia when compared with conventional manometry. By reproducibly subtyping achalasia into classic achalasia, achalasia with pressurization, or spastic achalasia with differential responses to treatment, HRM has potential to predict clinical outcomes. Preliminary observations with HRM suggest that much of what was labeled distal esophageal spasm is in fact achalasia with esophageal compression and pseudorelaxation, or spastic achalasia. HRM is capable of selectively analyzing discrete esophagogastric junction contributors (lower esophageal sphincter and crural diaphragm) during deglutitive relaxation to clearly identify the site of abnormally high outflow resistance. HRM has improved the recognition of a clinically heterogeneous entity called functional obstruction with potential for directed therapy.

SUMMARY

Improved, accurate and reproducible recognition of manometric diagnoses by HRM will allow the clinician to confidently diagnose esophageal disorders such as achalasia, direct therapy and predict outcomes.

Utility of non-endoscopic investigations in the practical management of oesophageal disorders

The current available methods for diagnosis of GORD are symptom questionnaires, catheter and wireless pH-metry, impedance-pH monitoring and Bilitec(@). Osophageal pH monitoring allows both quantitative analysis of acid reflux and assessment of reflux-symptom association. Impedance-pH monitoring detects all types of reflux (acid and non-acid) and allows assessment of proximal extent of reflux, a relevant parameter for understanding symptoms perception and extraoesophageal symptoms. Bilitec provides a quantitative assessment of duodeno-gastro-oesophageal reflux. Oesophageal motor abnormalities have been associated with GORD symptoms as well as chest pain and dysphagia. High-resolution manometry contributed to re-classify oesphageal motor disorders. However, barium swallows are still essential for evaluation of oesophageal anatomy and combined oesophageal manometry-impedance can assess oesophageal motility and bolus transit simultaneously in a non-radiological way. Still in experimental phase, high-frequency ultrasound allows monitoring of the oesophageal wall thickness and exaggerated longitudinal muscle contraction that might be associated to chest pain and dysphagia. This chapter provides a critical evaluation of the clinical application of these techniques.

Spasm, nutcracker, and IEM: real or manometry findings?

In 1987, Richter and colleagues published the results of an esophageal motility study conducted on 95 normal healthy volunteers between the ages of 22 and 79. In accordance with these results, abnormal esophageal motility was defined on the basis of the percentage of manometric normal, ineffective, and simultaneous swallows and on lower esophageal sphincter dynamics during liquid swallows. For example, Richter and colleagues found that the mean amplitude of contraction in the distal body of the esophagus >180 mm Hg in association with wet swallows was above the 95% confidence interval of normal. Richter's study also showed a wide variation among individuals and that the mean distal esophageal contractile amplitude increased with age without sex predominance. Likewise, as no subjects had >20% simultaneous contractions (though a considerable number, 4%, had 10% simultaneous contractions), esophageal spasm was defined at the >20% mark.

Diffuse esophageal spasm

The purpose of this article is to review the clinical features, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of patients with diffuse esophageal spasm (DES). The PubMed database was searched with a focus on recent publications, using keywords "DES," plus "epidemiology," "prevalence," "diagnosis," "pathogenesis," "calcium channel blocker," "nitrates," "botulinum toxin," "antidepressants," "dilation," and "myotomy." The reference lists of papers identified in the initial PubMed search were reviewed for further relevant publications.

Non-achalasic motor disorders of the oesophagus

Motor abnormalities of the oesophagus are characterised by a chronic impairment of the neuromuscular structures that co-ordinate oesophageal function. The best-defined entity is achalasia, which is discussed in a separate chapter. Other motor disorders with clinical relevance include diffuse oesophageal spasm, oesophageal dysmotility associated with scleroderma, and ineffective oesophageal motility. These non-achalasic motor disorders have variable prevalence but they could be associated with invalidating symptoms such as dysphagia, chest pain and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. New oesophageal diagnostic techniques, including high-resolution manometry, high-frequency intraluminal ultrasound and intraluminal impedance, allow (1) better definition of peristalsis and sphincter function, (2) assessment of changes in oesophageal wall thickness, and (3) evaluation of pressure gradients within the oesophagus and across the sphincters that can produce normal or abnormal patterns of bolus transport. This chapter discusses recent advances in physiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of non-achalasic oesophageal motor disorders.

[Approach to thoracic pain from the gastroenterologist's point of view]

Chest pain is common in medical consultations. One of the most frequent and serious causes is acute ischemic heart disease, which must be ruled out. The gold standard is coronary angiography. Noncardiac recurrent chest pain has a favorable prognosis. The most frequent cause is esophageal disease, with a prevalence of between 20% and 50%. The most frequent form is gastroesophageal reflux disease followed by esophageal motor disorders. Empirical treatment with high-dose proton pump inhibitors should be considered as a diagnostic-therapeutic test before performing exhaustive complementary investigations of esophageal function. Among complementary tests, manometry combined with 24-hour pH-metry has the highest diagnostic yield. Antidepressants are an acceptable therapeutic option in patients with esophageal visceral hyperalgesia.

Manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring in diagnosis and management of GORD

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is mainly diagnosed on symptoms and endoscopy findings. At least 50% of patients with GORD will have a normal oesophagus at endosopy. Twenty four-hour ambulatory pH monitoring together with manometry offers an accurate objective diagnosis of GORD and is helpful in directing appropriate treatments including surgery.

[Esophageal diverticula]

Esophageal diverticula are classified by location-phrenoesophageal (Zenker's diverticulum-70%), thoracic and mediastinal (10%), and epiphrenic (20%). Almost all esophageal diverticula are acquired pulsion diverticula. The most common symptoms are dysphagia, regurgitation, thoracic pain, and pulmonary manifestations related to aspiration. Barium swallow and upper endoscopy will help to establish the diagnosis while esophageal manometry may reveal underlying dysmotility. Diverticula should not be treated unless they are symptomatic. The treatment of Zenker's diverticulum is surgical and consists of either diverticulectomy or diverticular suspension with a myotomy of the cricopharyngeus muscle via cervical approach. Transoral endoscopic stapled diverticulostomy is a new and simple approach which may become the treatment of choice, particularly in elderly and high-risk patients. Treatment of diverticula of the mid and low esophagus must take into account any motor anomalies or associated lesions. Diverticulectomy with esophageal myotomy and an anti-reflux procedure through a left thoracotomy is the standard approach, but endoscopic approaches seem feasible, particularly for epiphrenic diverticula, and may become the norm in years to come.

Prolonged monitoring of esophageal motor function in healthy children

OBJECTIVE

To describe diurnal variations of esophageal motor function in children using combined ambulatory 24-hour esophageal manometry and continuous intraluminal pH measurement (MP24).

METHODS

Medical records of all patients referred for the performance of MP24 from 1995 to 2002 at a tertiary care center were reviewed. Patients were selected retrospectively for this study using the following inclusion criteria: (1) no dysphagia, (2) normal upper gastrointestinal barium radiograph, (3) normal esophagogastroduodenoscopy and biopsies, (4) normal stationary esophageal manometry, (5) normal esophageal pH probe, and (6) no gastrointestinal pathology appearing after long-term follow-up. Data from the MP24 of these children were retrospectively analyzed for differences between meal, upright, and supine periods using nonparametric univariate analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-three children had MP24 during the study period. Eleven met the criteria for normality and were included. Their mean age was 12.4 +/- 1.5 years. The number of contractions/minute in the upper, middle, and lower esophageal body differed significantly during meals and in the upright and supine periods (P < 0.01). A significant increase in motor activity occurred during meals (P < 0.01). There was less motor activity observed in the supine position than in the upright position (P < 0.01). There were significant differences in effective (P < 0.05) and total propagated peristalsis among the meal, upright, and supine periods (P < 0.01), with the largest percentage of propagated contractions observed during meals.

CONCLUSION

This study provides the first information on prolonged esophageal motor activity in pediatric patients without esophageal disease. MP24 in children demonstrates significant diurnal variations in esophageal motor function that is similar to the findings in studies of healthy adults.

Comparison of the esophageal manometric characteristics of idiopathic and reflux-associated esophageal spasm: evaluation by 24-hour ambulatory esophageal motility and pH monitoring

Diffuse esophageal spasm (DES) is a typical esophageal dysfunction, but its cause is unknown. DES has been classified into reflux-associated esophageal spasm (RDES), caused by acid exposure, and idiopathic esophageal spasm (IDES), of unknown causes. The differences in esophageal motility pattern between the RDES and IDES are clues to elucidating the pathogenesis of DES. Although 24-hr ambulatory esophageal motility and pH monitoring is considered a feasible method for evaluating gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal function, most researchers previously defined the RDES as DES accompanied by esophagitis and heartburn using standard manometry over a short time frame. To clarify the pathogenesis of RDES, we did this research using 24-hr ambulatory esophageal motility and pH monitoring. The investigation included 25 normal controls and 116 patients with upper digestive symptoms. Among the 116 patients, 45 had DES (11 RDES, 30 IDES, and DES-GERD coexistence). Patients with RDES showed a significantly higher frequency of simultaneous contractions than did patients with IDES. Heartburn has been said to be peculiar to RDES, but also occurred in 12.5% of IDES. No significant differences in the mean pH of the esophagus during acid reflux were found between the RDES and IDES patients. Based on the results, we have proposed a refined definition of RDES.

A review of oesophageal manometry testing in a district general hospital

Although several modalities are available to investigate oesophageal motility disorders, manometry is the gold standard. The procedure is increasingly available in district general hospitals but the clinical utility of this investigation in this setting remains unclear. The aim in this study was to evaluate the use and outcome of oesophageal manometry in a district general hospital. Data on 100 consecutive oesophageal manometry procedures were analysed, taking into account the referral pattern, indications, and results. The indications were gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (preoperative assessment before fundoplication) (58), dysphagia (28), chest pain (12), and epigastric pain (2). Diagnoses were made using predefined standard criteria and were as follows: normal (41), non-specific motility disorder (NSMD) (38), achalasia (15), diffuse oesophageal spasm (4), and scleroderma (2). Of the 58 patients who had undergone manometry as a preoperative assessment of oesophageal motility, 27 (47%) were abnormal. Twenty five (43%) had NSMD and two (3%) had achalasia. Forty eight of these preoperative cases were combined with 24 hour pH recording, which confirmed acid reflux in 35 (73%). The experience reported here reflects the published evidence that the use of manometry is changing. It is now more commonly used for assessment before antireflux surgery and for dysphagia, and the use in the assessment of chest pain is declining. The findings confirm the importance of eliminating achalasia before inappropriate antireflux surgery.

How long should a long-term esophageal motility study be?

It was the aim of this study to analyze whether a shorter measuring period would render the same diagnostic information on esophageal motility as a circadian measuring period in ambulatory esophageal manometry. In an investigation on normal volunteers (n = 10), patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease without esophageal motility disorders (n = 13), and patients with esophageal motility disorders (n = 14), a comparison was performed between a 5-hr and a 24-hr motility study. An analysis was performed on inter- and intraindividual reproducibility of time periods, prandial phases, and motility sequences (Wilcoxon and Spearman test). There was no significant difference between the two analyzed measuring periods in all three groups with regard to the diagnostic information on esophageal motility in 44 of 45 comparisons for intraindividual variability. A measuring period restricted to 5 hr offers the same diagnostic information on esophageal peristaltic activity as a 24-hr motility study.

Oesophageal diverticula

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal pulsion diverticula, excluding pharyngeal types, are uncommon sequelae of oesophageal dysmotility. Current opinion favours myotomy as effective therapy, but the role of diverticulectomy, myotomy selection and placement, and the need for fundoplication remain unresolved.

METHODS

A Medline search and review of references identified relevant English language articles. Data on epidemiology, aetiology, oesophageal motility, pathology, symptomatology, investigations, surgical management and outcome were examined.

RESULTS

Data were largely retrospective. Significant morbidity and mortality were associated with pulmonary aspiration and diverticulectomy site leaks. Surgical outcome was similar whether or not a diverticulectomy was added to a myotomy, but a myotomy clearly reduced the risk of leaks. Fundoplication reduced the incidence of postcardiomyotomy reflux symptoms. Results from minimally invasive techniques were similar to those of open surgery.

CONCLUSION

Surgery should be reserved for symptomatic patients; asymptomatic patients may benefit from surveillance. Pulmonary aspiration mandates surgical intervention. Myotomy remains the mainstay of treatment and an adequate subdiverticular extension is crucial in relieving obstruction. A partial fundoplication is preferred in selected patients. Minimally invasive techniques should become the routine approach for oesophageal pulsion diverticula.

Antidepressant treatment of patients with diffuse esophageal spasm: a psychosomatic approach

The cause of diffuse esophageal spasm (DES) has not been clearly established, and effective treatment is lacking. To determine whether a psychosomatic approach can be effective in treating DES patients, nine patients and 26 healthy volunteers were studied. Esophageal manometry and psychological testing were performed in both groups. The psychological background of the DES patients was investigated. Psychiatric diagnoses were made according to the criteria outlined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edition, revised. The authors started psychosomatic treatment with isosorbide dinitrate for 1 month, then prescribed serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants for an additional month. Anxiety and depression scores were substantially higher for the DES group than for the control group. Five of the nine DES patients (56%) were diagnosed as having major psychiatric disorders. Only one patient showed improvement with isosorbide dinitrate, and eight patients improved with antidepressants. These initial observations suggest that psychosomatic treatment with antidepressants may be effective in the treatment of DES.

An investigation into the spatial relationship between complexity and motility within the oesophagus

Nonlinear analysis techniques have recently been used in the characterization of complex physiological signals seen in pathological disorders such as epilepsy and cardiac fibrillation. In this study a series of controlled swallows from an asymptomatic demonstration group was investigated using oesophageal manometry. The nonlinear measure of complexity, largest Lyapunov exponents and phase portraits were then used to explore the complexity of motility patterns at different points within the oesophagus. Results indicate greater complexity within the region of the striated muscle in the upper oesophagus than that observed within the region of smooth muscle in the lower oesophagus. Phase portraits showed that manometry patterns within the asymptomatic demonstration group could be quite different, highlighting the problems in clinical diagnosis. The characterization of motility disorders associated with complex manometry patterns such as diffuse oesophageal spasm (DOS) and nonspecific motility disorder (NOMD) still represents a diagnostic challenge. The use of nonlinear techniques enabling the quantitative and qualitative measurement of oesophageal complexity is considered in the classification of such disorders.