Clinical implication of LAVI over A' ratio in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Assessment of left atrial function provides incremental value: the left atrial volumetric/mechanical coupling index in patients with chronic kidney disease

Background

Heart failure is a common cause of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Left atrial (LA) characteristics are thought to be involved in the development of heart failure. However, LA assessment is complex. Though a variety of parameters have been defined, there is no single parameter that best defines LA function. Pilot data indicate that left atrial volumetric/mechanical coupling index (LACI) may be useful, but data with CKD are lacking.

Aim

The objective of this study was to define LACI in a cohort of patients with CKD and to assess its value in evaluating LA function and predicting heart failure.

Methods

A cohort of patients with CKD was enrolled at our hospital between 2021 and 2023. Follow-up was performed for heart failure. LACI is a volumetric to mechanical coupling index, calculated as the ratio of the LA volume index to the tissue-Doppler myocardial velocity at atrial contraction. Spearman's rank correlation or Pearson's correlation was used to calculate the correlation between LACI and echocardiographic/hemodynamic variables. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was utilised to derive the area under the curve (AUC) for LACI, LVGLS, LASr, LASct and LASI for the detection of heart failure. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were employed to compare clinical outcomes based on LACI thresholds. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to assess the relationship between risk factors and elevated LACI. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify risk factors for heart failure.

Results

LACI showed a positive correlation with NT-proBNP, CK-MB, LAVI, E/e' and LASI (r = 0.504, 0.536, 0.856, 0.541 and 0.509, p < 0.001); and a negative correlation with LASr (r = -0.509, p < 0.001). On the ROC analysis for the determination of heart failure, the AUC of LACI was comparable to those of LVGLS (0.588 vs. 509, p = 0.464), LASr (0.588 vs. 0.448, p = 0.132), LASct (0.588 vs. 0.566, p = 0.971) and LASI (0.588 vs. 0.570, p = 0.874). The cardiovascular risk factors increased by LACI were age, BMI, diabetes, triglycerides, LA size, LASr, LASI, E/A, E/e' and EF (p < 0.05). During a median follow-up of 16 months (range, 6-28 months), the event-free survival curves demonstrated a higher risk of heart failure in the group with LACI > 5.0 (log-rank test: P < 0.001). LACI > 5.0 was an independent predictor of heart failure [OR: 0.121, 95% CI (0.020-0.740), p = 0.022].

Conclusion

LACI may prove to be a valuable tool for assessing LA function in patients with CKD, and could be integrated into the routine assessment of LA for the purpose of prognostic assessment and clinical decision-making in patients with CKD.

Implications of left atrial volume index in patients with three-vessel coronary disease: A 6.6-year follow-up cohort study

BACKGROUND

Risk assessment and treatment stratification for three-vessel coronary disease (TVD) remain challenging. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of left atrial volume index (LAVI) with the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score II, and its association with the long-term prognosis after three strategies (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG], and medical therapy [MT]) in patients with TVD.

METHODS

This study was a post hoc analysis of a large, prospective cohort of patients with TVD in China, that aimed to determine the long-term outcomes after PCI, CABG, or optimal MT alone. A total of 8943 patients with TVD were consecutively enrolled between 2004 and 2011 at Fuwai Hospital. A total of 7818 patients with available baseline LAVI data were included in the study. Baseline, procedural, and follow-up data were collected. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), which was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke. Secondary endpoints included all-cause death, cardiac death, MI, revascularization, and stroke. Long-term outcomes were evaluated among LAVI quartile groups.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 6.6 years, a higher LAVI was strongly associated with increased risk of MACCE (Q3: hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.37, P = 0.005; Q4: HR 1.85, 95%CI 1.64-2.09, P <0.001), all-cause death (Q3: HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.17-1.69, P <0.001; Q4: HR 2.54, 95%CI 2.16-3.00, P <0.001), and cardiac death (Q3: HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.39-2.37, P <0.001; Q4: HR 3.47, 95%CI 2.71-4.43, P <0.001). Moreover, LAVI significantly improved discrimination and reclassification of the SYNTAX score II. Notably, there was a significant interaction between LAVI quartiles and treatment strategies for MACCE. CABG was associated with lower risk of MACCE than MT alone, regardless of LAVI quartiles. Among patients in the fourth quartile, PCI was associated with significantly increased risk of cardiac death compared with CABG (HR: 5.25, 95% CI: 1.97-14.03, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

LAVI is a potential index for risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making in patients with three-vessel coronary disease. CABG is associated with improved long-term outcomes compared with MT alone, regardless of LAVI quartiles. When LAVI is severely elevated, PCI is associated with higher risk of cardiac death than CABG.

Considering Both GLS and MD for a Prognostic Value in Non-ST-Segment Elevated Acute Coronary Artery Syndrome

Global longitudinal strain (GLS) and mechanical dispersion (MD), as determined by 2D speckle tracking echocardiography, have been demonstrated to be reliable indicators of prognosis in a variety of cardiovascular illnesses. There are not many papers that discuss the prognostic significance of GLS and MD in a population with non-ST-segment elevated acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Our study objective was to examine the predictive utility of the novel GLS/MD two-dimensional strain index in NSTE-ACS patients. Before discharge and four to six weeks later, echocardiography was performed on 310 consecutive hospitalized patients with NSTE-ACS and effective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Cardiac mortality, malignant ventricular arrhythmia, or readmission owing to heart failure or reinfarction were the major end points. A total of 109 patients (35.16%) experienced cardiac incidents during the follow-up period (34.7 ± 8 months). The GLS/MD index at discharge was determined to be the greatest independent predictor of composite result by receiver operating characteristic analysis. The ideal cut-off value was -0.229. GLS/MD was determined to be the top independent predictor of cardiac events by multivariate Cox regression analysis. Patients with an initial GLS/MD > -0.229 that deteriorated after four to six weeks had the worst prognosis for a composite outcome, readmission, and cardiac death according to a Kaplan-Meier analysis (all p < 0.001). In conclusion, the GLS/MD ratio is a strong indicator of clinical fate in NSTE-ACS patients, especially if it is accompanied by deterioration.

The Incremental Prognostic Value of E/(e'×s') Ratio in Non-ST-Segment Elevated Acute Coronary Syndrome

It has been shown that the E/(e’×s’) index, which associates a marker of diastolic function (E/e’, early transmitral/diastolic mitral annulus velocity ratio) and a parameter that explores LV systolic performance (s’, systolic mitral annulus velocity), is a good predictor of outcome in acute anterior myocardial infarction. There are no studies that have investigated the prognostic value of E/(e’×s’) in a non-ST-segment elevated acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) population. Echocardiography was performed in 307 consecutive hospitalized patients with NSTE-ACS and succesful percutaneous coronary intervention, before discharge and six weeks after. The primary endpoint consisted of cardiac death or readmission due to re-infarction or heart failure. During the follow-up period (25.4 ± 3 months), cardiac events occurred in 106 patients (34.5%). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified E/(e’×s’) at discharge as the best independent predictor of composite outcome. The optimal cut-off value was 1.63 (74% sensitivity, 67% specificity). By multivariate Cox regression analysis, E/(e’×s’) was the only independent predictor of cardiac events. Kaplan–Meier analysis identified that patients with an initial E/(e’×s’) > 1.63 that worsened after six weeks presented the worst prognosis regarding composite outcome, readmission, and cardiac death (all p < 0.001). In conclusion, in NSTE-ACS, E/(e’×s’) is a powerful predictor of clinical outcome, particularly if it is accompanied by worsening after 6-weeks.

Left Atrial Volumetric/Mechanical Coupling Index: A Novel Predictor of Outcome in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

Left atrial assessment is complex, particularly in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction due to interactions with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). Pilot data suggest that left atrial volumetric/mechanical coupling index (LACI) may be useful, but large outcome data are lacking.

METHODS

We enrolled a comprehensively characterized cohort of patients in sinus rhythm with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction diagnosis at Mayo Clinic from 2007 to 2011. Routinely measured left atrial volume index and tissue-doppler-imaging a' allowed LACI calculation as (left atrial volume index)/(tissue-doppler-imaging a'). Survival was the outcome measured.

RESULTS

The cohort's 4196 patients (69 [58-77] years, ejection fraction 40 [31-45]%) had mild FMR in 1505 and moderate-severe FMR in 1068. LACI was overall 5.06 (3.50-8.10) and increased with each FMR grade (3.86 [2.94-5.29] without FMR, 5.38 [3.80-8.02] with mild, 5.45 [1.49-8.07] with moderate/severe FMR; P<0.0001). At diagnosis, higher LACI was independently determined by more severe FMR and by higher left ventricular mass index, lower ejection fraction, higher E/e', and lower glomerular filtration rate (all P<0.0001). During follow-up 1588 (38%) patients died. In spline modeling, excess mortality appeared around LACI=6 and steeply increased thereafter (5-year survival 72±1% with LACI<6 and 49±2% with LACI ≥6, P<0.0001). Multivariable comprehensive adjustment showed LACI strong association with excess mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.41 [1.23-1.61], P<0.0001 for LACI ≥6). Independent link to mortality persistent across FMR grades (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.45 [1.13-1.86], P=0.004 without FMR, 1.42 [1.16-1.77], P=0.0008 with mild FMR, and 1.38 [1.01-1.66], P=0.04 with moderate/severe FMR) without interaction (P=0.3). LACI independent impact on outcome was incremental to that of left atrial volume index, tissue-doppler-imaging a', or any other characteristic including the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic-score (least significant P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort, left atrial volumetric/mechanical coupling measured by LACI in routine practice integrates the influence of several morphological/hemodynamic determinants but displays progressive deterioration with increasing FMR severity in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. About outcome, higher LACI is strongly, independently, and incrementally associated with excess mortality, irrespective of FMR grade and in all subsets. Hence, LACI is a novel and critical measure in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, quantifiable in routine practice, which should be integrated in prognostication and decision-making.

Discrepancies in Assessing Diastolic Function in Pre-Clinical Heart Failure Using Different Algorithms-A Primary Care Study

Background: Current guidelines on diastolic function (DF) by the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (ASE/EACVI) have been disputed and two alternative algorithms have been proposed by Johansen et al. and Oh et al. We sought (a) to assess the concordance of ASE/EACVI guidelines on DF using these proposed alternative approaches and (b) to evaluate the prevalence of indeterminate diastolic dysfunction (DD) by each method, exploring means for reducing their number. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the echocardiographic reports of 1158 outpatients including subjects at risk of heart failure without (n = 644) or with (n = 241) structural heart disease, and 273 healthy individuals. Concordance was calculated using the k coefficient and overall proportion of DD reclassification rate. The effectiveness of pulmonary vein flow (PVF), Valsalva maneuver, and left atrial volume index/late diastolic a’-ratio (LAVi/a’) over indeterminate grading was assessed. Results: The DD reclassification rate was 30.1% (k = 0.35) for ASE/EACVI and OH, 36.5% (k = 0.27) for ASE/EACVI and JOHANSEN and 31.1% (k = 0.37) for OH and JOHANSEN (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons). DF could not be graded only by ASE/EACVI and OH in 9% and 11% patients, respectively. The majority of patients could be reclassified using PVF or Valsalva maneuver or LAVi/a’, with the latter being the single most effective parameter. Conclusion: Inconsistencies between updated guidelines and independent approaches to assess and grade DF impede their interchangeable clinical use. The inconclusive diagnoses can be reconciled by conventional echocardiography in most patients, and LAVi/a’ emerges as a simple and effective approach to this aim.