Bilateral internal mammary artery grafts, mortality and morbidity: an analysis of 1 526 360 coronary bypass operations

The Impact of Gender and Age in Obese Patients on Sternal Instability and Deep-Sternal-Wound-Healing Disorders after Median Sternotomy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between age and sex in regard to the development of deep sternal wound infections and sternal instability following median sternotomy.

METHODS

A propensity-score-matching analysis was conducted on 4505 patients who underwent cardiac surgery between 2009 and 2021, all of whom had a BMI of ≥30 kg/m². A total of 1297 matched pairs were determined in the sex group, and 1449 matched pairs we determined in the age group. The distributions of sex, age, diabetes mellitus, delirium, unstable sterna, wire refixation, wire removal, superficial vacuum-assisted wound closure, deep vacuum-assisted wound closure, clamp time, bypass time, logistic EuroSCORE, and BMI were determined.

RESULTS

The 30-day in-hospital mortality was found to be similar in the older and younger groups (8.149% vs. 8.35%, p = 0.947), and diabetes mellitus was also equally distributed in both groups. However, postoperative delirium occurred significantly more often in the older group (29.81% vs. 17.46%, p < 0.001), and there was a significantly higher incidence in men compared with women (16.96% vs. 26.91%, p < 0.001). There were no differences found in the incidence of sternum instability, fractured sternum, superficial vacuum-assisted wound closure, and deep vacuum-assisted wound closure between the age and sex groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, this study found that sternal instability and deep-wound-healing problems occur with equal frequency in older and younger patients and in men and women following median sternotomy. However, the likelihood of postoperative delirium is significantly higher in older patients and in men. These findings suggest that a higher level of monitoring and care may be required for these high-risk patient groups to reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium and improve outcomes following median sternotomy.

Sex-Associated Differences in Short-Term Outcomes in Patients with Deep Sternal Wound Infection after Open-Heart Surgery

Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) is a feared complication after cardiac surgery. The impact of sex-related differences on wound infection prevalence is poorly understood. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of sex on short-term outcomes in patients with DSWI after open-heart surgery. The study was a retrospective cohort study. A total of 217 patients with DSWI were identified and retrospectively analyzed using our institutional database. Patients were divided into two groups: males (n = 150) and females (n = 67). This study also includes a propensity score based matching (PSM) analysis (male group (n = 62) and female group (n = 62)) to examine the unequal groups. Mean age (p = 0.088) and mean body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.905) did not significantly differ between both groups. Vacuum assisted closure (VAC) therapy was performed among most patients (82.3% (male group) vs. 83.9% (female group), p = 0.432). The most commonly isolated bacteria from the wounds were Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus in both groups. Acute renal failure was significantly higher (p = 0.010) in the male group compared to the female group. However, dialysis rate did not significantly differ (p = 0.491) between male and female groups. Further secondary outcomes showed no major differences between the groups. Likewise, in-hospital mortality rate did not differ significantly (p = 0.680) between both groups. Based on our data, sex has no impact on deep wound infection prevalence after cardiac surgery.

Up-to-Date, Skeletonized or Pedicle Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery; Does It Matter?

PURPOSE

In this article, we reported on the up-to-date literature regarding skeletonized bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) flow and the effect on sternal perfusion. We also reviewed the pros and cons of the skeletonization technique versus the conventional pedicle technique for harvesting the BIMA.

METHODS

We performed an up-to-date review using the PubMed database, with a specific focus on the contemporary published literature.

RESULTS

BIMA skeletonization can preserve the sternal microcirculation, minimize tissue damage, and maintain blood supply to the chest wall at the tissue level. This effect is also apparent in diabetics. Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) rates are significantly less with skeletonization versus the conventional pedicle technique and are comparable to single internal mammary artery harvesting.

CONCLUSIONS

Contemporary large-scale studies demonstrate that skeletonization of the BIMA increases conduit length, provides superior flow, reduces the incidence of DSWIs, and improves late survival. Hopefully, this review will increase awareness of the compelling evidence in favor of using skeletonized internal mammary arteries and stimulate increased uptake of BIMA revascularization surgery.

The Economic Implications of Introducing Single-Patient ECG Systems for Cardiac Surgery in Australia

Introduction

Sternal wound infections (SWIs) are severe adverse events of cardiac surgery. This study aimed to estimate the economic burden of SWIs following coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) in Australia. It also aimed to estimate the national and hospital cost-benefit of adopting single-patient electrocardiograph (spECG) systems for CABG monitoring, a measure that reduces the rate of surgical site infections (SSIs).

Material and Methods

A literature review, which focused on CABG-related SSIs, was conducted to identify data which were then used to adapt a published Markov cost-effectiveness model. The model adopted an Australian hospital perspective.

Results

The average SWI-related cost of care increase per patient was estimated at 1022 Australian dollars (AUD), and the annual burden to the Australian health care system at AUD 9.2 million. SWI burden comprised 360 additional intensive care unit (ICU) days; 1979 additional general ward (GW) days; and 186 readmissions. Implementing spECG resulted in 103 fewer ICU days, 565 fewer GW days, 48 avoided readmissions, and a total national cost saving of AUD 2.5 million, annually. A hospital performing 200 yearly CABGs was estimated to save AUD 54,830.

Conclusion

SWIs cause substantial costs to the Australian health care system. Implementing new technologies shown to reduce the SWI rate is likely to benefit patients and reduce costs.

Early removal of chest drains in patients following off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCAB) is not inferior to standard care - study in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) group

Introduction

Only a few studies have concerned the timing of chest drains’ removal in cardiac surgery patients following the coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). None of them pertained to the off-pump CABG (OPCAB) procedure.

Aim

To compare thoracic drainage time in OPCAB patients before the implementation of the institutional Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol and after that.

Material and methods

It was a single-center observational study concerning patients following OPCAB. Two groups of patients were analyzed: after implementing the ERAS protocol, the ERAS group, and before this period, the standard care group (STAND group). The primary outcome of this study was to compare postoperative drainage time in the ERAS and STAND groups. The other outcomes included comparing transfused blood products, postoperative complications, surgical technique, postoperative ventilation and the intensive care unit stay time.

Results

Sixty patients in the ERAS and 112 in the STAND group were analyzed. The postoperative drainage time was shorter in the ERAS than in the STAND group: 20 (17–22) vs. 30 (27–35) h, p < 0.001. The number of transfused blood products was similar in both groups. No difference was noted between groups according to surgery and anesthesia time. However, patients in the ERAS group were ventilated for a significantly shorter time after the surgery and spent less time in the ICU than the STAND group. The number of postoperative complications in the ERAS and STAND group was 14 and 27, p = 1.

Conclusions

The early removal of chest drains after OPCAB does not increase the risk of postoperative complications and demand for blood products. However, its impact on patients’ morbidity needs further studies.

The management of deep sternal wound infection: Literature review and reconstructive algorithm

Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) is an important complication of open thoracic surgery, with a reported incidence of 0.5-6%. Given its association with increased morbidity, mortality, inpatient duration, financial burden, and re-operation rates, an aggressive approach to treatment is mandated. Flap reconstruction has become the standard of care, with studies demonstrating improved outcomes with reduced mortality and resource usage in patients undergoing early versus delayed flap reconstruction. Despite this, no evidence-based standard for the management of DSWI exists. We performed a thorough review of the literature to identify principles in management, using a PRISMA compliant methodology. Ovid-Embase, Medline and PubMed databases were searched for relevant papers using the search terms "deep sternal wound infection," and "post-sternotomy mediastinitis" to December 2019. Duplicates were removed, and the search narrowed to look at specific areas of interest i.e. negative pressure wound therapy, flap reconstruction, and rigid fixation. The reference list of included articles underwent full text review. No randomized controlled trials were identified. We review the current management techniques for patients with DSWI, and raise awareness for the need for further high quality studies, and a standardized national cardiothoracic-plastic surgery guideline to guide management. Based on our findings and the authors' own experience in this area, we provide evidence-based recommendations. We also propose a reconstructive algorithm.

Coronary revascularization in patients with stable coronary disease and diabetes mellitus

PURPOSE OF STUDY

Diabetes mellitus accelerates the development of atherosclerosis. Patients with diabetes mellitus have higher incidence and mortality rates from cardiovascular disease and undergo a disproportionately higher number of coronary interventions compared to the general population. Proper selection of treatment modalities is thus paramount. Treatment strategies include medical management and interventional approaches including coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The purpose of this review is to assimilate emerging evidence comparing CABG to PCI in patients with diabetes and present an outlook on the latest advances in percutaneous interventions, in addition to the optimal medical therapies in patients with diabetes.

KEY METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science and EMBASE was performed to identify prospective, randomized trials comparing outcomes of CABG and PCI, and also PCI with different generations of stents used in patients with diabetes. Additional review of bibliography of selected studies was also performed.

MAIN CONCLUSIONS

Most of the trials discussed above demonstrate a survival advantage of CABG over PCI in patients with diabetes. However, recent advances in PCI technology are starting to challenge this narrative. Superior stent designs, use of specific drug-eluting stents, image-guided stent deployment, and the use of contemporary antiplatelet and lipid-lowering therapies are continuing to improve the PCI outcomes. Prospective data for such emerging interventional technologies in diabetes is however lacking currently and is the need of the hour.

Left or bilateral internal mammary artery employment in coronary artery bypass grafting: midterm results

BACKGROUND

The gold standard for coronary artery bypass grafting to the left anterior descending artery is use of the left internal mammary artery. Better long-term survival has been reported using bilateral internal mammary arteries compared to left internal mammary artery only, but many surgeons are reluctant to employ bilateral internal mammary arteries in coronary artery bypass grafting. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of bilateral internal mammary artery use.

METHODS

From 2014 to 2017, 1703 patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting in our institute. Of these, 772 met the inclusion criteria and were randomly assigned to receive bilateral (n = 387) or left (n = 385) internal mammary artery grafts. The mean age was 67.1 ± 6.0 years (range 48-85 years) and 474 (61.4%) were male. The mean number of diseased vessels was 3.1 ± 0.9, and mean EuroSCORE II was 3.4% ± 1.1%.

RESULTS

Hospital mortality was 1.2% in the left internal mammary artery group vs. 1.8% in the bilateral internal mammary artery group (p = 0.55). There was no difference in procedure-related complications between groups. Mean follow-up was 65.9 months. Survival in the bilateral internal mammary artery group at 1, 3, and 5 years was 98.7%, 98.7%, and 94.8% vs. 98.1%, 98.1%, and 90.9%, respectively, in the left internal mammary artery group (p = 0.63).

CONCLUSION

Application of bilateral internal mammary arteries in coronary artery bypass grafting is safe and effective, with comparable midterm results to those with the left internal mammary artery only.

Bilateral internal thoracic artery use in coronary artery bypass grafting in the post-ART era - Perspective

There is still lack of convincing evidence about the superiority of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) use in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and BITA grafts continue to be underutilized. Arterial Revascularization Trial (ART) did not demonstrate the superiority of BITA versus single ITA grafting after 10 years. We have reviewed the most recent literature, assessed the current status as well as indications of BITA grafting in the post-ART era. We believe that BITA grafting is not appropriate for all patients especially in light of the findings of ART. However, the use of BITA is justified in patients of younger age and those without comorbidities (poorly controlled diabetes, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, previous mediastinal irradiation, long-term steroid use, elderly women). Further prospective randomized studies with long-term follow-up are needed to validate the benefits of BITA grafting.

Predictors and In-Hospital Outcomes Among Patients Using a Single Versus Bilateral Mammary Arteries in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

The benefit of bilateral mammary artery (BIMA) use during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) continues to be debated. This study examined nationwide trends in BIMA use and factors influencing its utilization. Using the National Inpatient Sample, adults undergoing isolated multivessel CABG between 2005 and 2015 were identified and stratified based on the use of a single mammary artery or BIMA. Regression models were fit to identify patient and hospital level predictors of BIMA use and characterize the association of BIMA on outcomes including sternal infection, mortality, and resource utilization. An estimated 4.5% (n = 60,698) of patients underwent CABG with BIMA, with a steady increase from 3.8% to 5.0% over time (p<0.001). Younger age, male gender, and elective admission, were significant predictors of BIMA use. Moreover, private insurance was associated with higher odds of BIMA use (adjusted odds ratio 1.24) compared with Medicare. BIMA use was not a predictor of postoperative sternal infection, in-hospital mortality, or hospitalization costs. Overall, BIMA use remains uncommon in the United States despite no significant differences in acute postoperative outcomes. Several patient, hospital, and socioeconomic factors appear to be associated with BIMA utilization.

[Early and long-term outcomes of bilateral inthernal thoracic artery grafting for coronary artery bypass surgery]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate safety of coronary artery bypass surgery using bilateral internal mammary artery and effectiveness of this procedure in long-term postoperative period.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study involved 129 patients who underwent CABG for the period 2006-2007. There were 2 groups of patients depending on surgical strategy: group 1 (n=61) - double IMA harvesting, group 2 (n=68) - CABG using single IMA. Short-term results were compared using standard statistical methods. Long-term survival was compared using Kaplan-Meyer method.

RESULTS

Revascularization index was 3.014±0.76 in the 1st group and 3.1±0.73 in the 2nd group (p>0.05). In-hospital mortality was 0% and 1.47%, respectively (p> 0.05). A 10-year survival was 95.1% and 91.2%, respectively (p>0.05). Freedom from cardiac events (mortality, myocardial infarction, recurrent angina pectoris) was significantly different (95% vs. 81%, p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Significantly lower rate of adverse cardiac events in long-term postoperative period in comparison with conventional CABG clearly demonstrates high quality of life after coronary artery bypass surgery using bilateral internal mammary artery for a long time. Therefore, this procedure is preferred in patients with coronary artery disease.

Surgical delay of anterior chest wall prior to open coronary arterial bypass grafting surgery may decrease postoperative sternal complications

Open coronary arterial bypass grafting (CABG) procedures are inherently risky in regards to the healing capacity of the subsequent sternal wound. Patients often have underlying risk factors for poor healing and the procedure itself often reduces vascularity to the anterior chest with internal mammary artery (IMA) dissection. Currently unrelated is the surgical delay procedure. It is a well-established technique for augmenting vascularity and ultimatelytissue survival. It involves partial disruption of the blood supply to a flap for a period of time prior to fully elevating the flap (usually between 3 and 21 days). Recently, endoscopic robotic IMA dissection has become possible as a part of totally endoscopic CABGs for left-sided vessel disease. We are proposing a new technique, using surgical delay for patients who require open sternotomies for CABGS to reduce the rate of postoperative sternal wound complications. To delay the CABG, the majority of a robotic internal IMA dissectionwould be performed prior to an open CABG via a midline sternotomy. We hypothesize that this may decrease sternal wound complication rates. Potential pitfalls include consequences of disrupting the normal anatomic location of the IMAs and causing inflammation before the open CABG. Animal models will be the next step, as they will evaluate the feasibility of the delay as well as help to determine the optimal timing for the procedure.

Short-term results of bilateral internal mammary arterial grafting for patients aged 60-75 years - a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) grafting has a good long-term survival rate and graft patency rate, but it is only recommended in young patients due to its high technical requirements and high incidence of sternal complications. Previous studies indicated that BIMA grafting has a significant benefit in patients aged 50-59 years, but this benefit does not extend to patients aged > 60 years. Thus, this study was designed to analyse the immediate artery graft function, short-term (3 months) results, and experience in preventing sternal complications for BIMA grafting in elderly patients (60-75 years old).

METHODS

Clinical records and echocardiographic and coronary artery computed tomography angiography data of 155 patients who underwent BIMA grafting for coronary artery disease between 2015 and 2017 in our hospital were analysed retrospectively to summarise the operative experience and short-term (3 months) results. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (n = 95), aged < 60 years and Group B (n = 60), aged 60-75 years. The operation time, aortic clamp time, and cardiopulmonary bypass time of these two groups were compared to analyse the operation difficulty and the flow and pulsatility index were compared to analyse the immediate artery graft function. The left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of these two groups were compared to analyse heart function.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the operation time, aortic clamp time, and cardiopulmonary bypass time as well as the flow and pulsatility index between these two groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of sternal wound complications, graft occlusion, and other common complications 3 months post-BIMA grafting between these two groups (P > 0.05). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in LVEDD and LVEF between the groups 3 months post-operation (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

BIMA grafting was safe and effective for older patients (60-75 years). Similar to younger patients (< 60 years), BIMA grafting in elderly patients (60-75 years) can also achieve a satisfactory short-term (3 months) result. Thus, advanced age (60-75 years) should not be a contraindication for BIMA grafting.

Five-year costs from a randomised comparison of bilateral and single internal thoracic artery grafts

BACKGROUND

The use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITA) for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may improve survival compared with CABG using single internal thoracic arteries (SITA). We assessed the long-term costs of BITA compared with SITA.

METHODS

Between June 2004 and December 2007, 3102 patients from 28 hospitals in seven countries were randomised to CABG surgery using BITA (n=1548) or SITA (n=1554). Detailed resource use data were collected from the initial hospital episode and annually up to 5 years. The associated costs of this resource use were assessed from a UK perspective with 5 year totals calculated for each trial arm and pre-selected patient subgroups.

RESULTS

Total costs increased by approximately £1000 annually in each arm, with no significant annual difference between trial arms. Cumulative costs per patient at 5-year follow-up remained significantly higher in the BITA group (£18 629) compared with the SITA group (£17 480; mean cost difference £1149, 95% CI £330 to £1968, p=0.006) due to the higher costs of the initial procedure. There were no significant differences between the trial arms in the cost associated with healthcare contacts, medication use or serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher index costs for BITA were still present at 5-year follow-up mainly driven by the higher initial cost with no subsequent difference emerging between 1 year and 5 years of follow-up. The overall cost-effectiveness of the two procedures, to be assessed at the primary endpoint of the 10-year follow-up, will depend on composite differences in costs and quality-adjusted survival.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN46552265.

Immediate results of bypass grafting of the territory of the right coronary artery using the 'Penza Coronary Technology'

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is known to be an effective method of treatment for multivessel obstructive coronary disease with low rates of reintervention and excellent long-term survival and freedom from angina. Graft patency lies at the heart of its procedural success and durability, which in its turn largely depends on the appropriate choice of the conduit, as well as the target coronary artery (CA). It should be mentioned that patency of one and the same conduit used for bypass grafting of the territory of either the left or right coronary artery (LCA and RCA, respectively) may differ, which is probably determined by differences in physiology, size, territory of runoff, and local flow characteristics between different coronary targets. Previous reports have supported the use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries to revascularize the left coronary circulation. If this becomes standardized practice, the optimal conduit for the right coronary system remains to be established. Proposed in the present article is a variant of bypass grafting of the RCA territory using a composite I-graft formed from the proximal portion of the right internal thoracic artery (ITA) in situ and the great saphenous vein (GSV) harvested by the 'no-touch' technique. This technique is part of a CABG schematic algorithm worked out in our Clinic and called the 'Penza Coronary Technology'.

Routine use of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in women does not increase in-hospital mortality and could improve long-term survival

BACKGROUND

Bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting is underused in women.

METHODS

Outcomes of 798 consecutive women with multivessel coronary disease who underwent isolated coronary surgery (1999-2016) using BITA (n=530, 66.4%) or single internal thoracic artery (SITA) grafting (n=268, 33.6%) were reviewed retrospectively. Differences between BITA and SITA cohort were adjusted by propensity score matching. For both series, late survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

One-to-one propensity score matching resulted in 247 BITA/SITA pairs with similar baseline characteristics and risk profile. According to the propensity matching, BITA grafting was associated with a trend towards reduced in-hospital mortality (3.2% vs. 5.7%, p=0.19). However, BITA women had an increased chest tube output (p=0.0076) as well as higher rates of any (13% vs. 5.3%, p=0.003) and deep sternal wound infections (9.3% vs. 4.9%, p=0.054), this translating in a longer in-hospital stay (10 vs. 9days, p=0.029). Test for interaction showed that body mass index >30kg/m² and extracardiac arteriopathy were associated with a higher risk of deep sternal wound infection in BITA than in SITA women (23.4% vs. 13.7%, p<0.001 and 23.9% vs. 3.4%, p=0.001, respectively). Freedom from all-cause death and cardiac or cerebrovascular death were improved in BITA cohort, even though the differences were not quite significant (p=0.16 and 0.076, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

When routinely performed, BITA grafting does not increase in-hospital mortality in women and could improve long-term survival. However, its use should be avoided in obese women with extracardiac arteriopathy because of increased risk of deep sternal wound infection.

A review of hybrid coronary revascularization

Purpose

Hybrid coronary revascularization is an emerging treatment strategy for coronary artery disease. We will review the reasons for the development of this strategy, describe surgical techniques, and review outcomes. Finally, we will discuss the future of hybrid revascularization and explain why it will grow as a treatment modality.

Methods

For this review, we conducted an unstructured review of the literature for articles related to hybrid coronary revascularization, bypass surgery, and percutaneous coronary interventions.

Results

Hybrid coronary revascularization has been shown in large series to have excellent results. These include fast recovery time, low mortality and rates of complications, and excellent surgical graft patency. There may be increased need for revascularization over conventional bypass surgery.

Conclusions

The combination improved surgical techniques including a robotic surgery platform, as well as the ever-improving efficacy and durability of coronary stents have made hybrid coronary revascularization an attractive option for many patients. It offers a minimally invasive approach to surgery while avoiding the poor patency of saphenous vein grafts. In appropriately selected patients, this may be an ideal treatment strategy that minimizes risks and maximizes short- and long-term benefits.

Deep sternal infections after in situ bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting for left ventricular myocardial revascularization: predictors and influence on 20-year outcomes

Background

The incidence and potential factors influencing deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) in a cohort of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using skeletonized bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) was explored. Furthermore, we studied influence of DSWI on long-term survival, major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and repeat coronary revascularization (RCR).

Methods

The study cohort consisted of 1,325 consecutive patients who were divided in two groups: patients experiencing DSWI (n=33, group 1) and those who did not have sternal infection (n=1,292, group 2). A logistic regression model was employed to find predictors of DSWI whereas Cox regression and a competing risk models were carried out to test predictors of late death, MACE and RCR, respectively. Follow up was 100% complete and ranged from 1 to 245 months. Median follow-up was 103 months (IQR, 61 to 189 months). Cumulative follow-up was 16,430 patient years.

Results

The incidence of DSWI was 2.4%. Multivariable logistic regression analysis found any single independent predictor of DSWI. However, the association of peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and diabetes increased the risk by 1.4 and 1.6 times. When DM was associated with obesity the risk increased by 2.1 and 2.6 times compared to the single factors, respectively. Obese female patients were at a 1.6-fold higher risk when compared to the association of DM with obesity. DSWI was not an independent predictor of long-term survival (HR, 2.31; 95% CI: 0.59-9.12), RCR (SHR, 2.89; 95% CI: 0.65-10.12), or MACE (SHR, 1.98; 95% CI: 0.44-8.56).

Conclusions

With an accurate patient selection (i.e., exclusion of obese diabetic females) and strict DM control BITA represents a first choice for most of CABG patients, even at high risk for DSWI. The occurrence of DSWI does not influence long-term survival and late outcomes. Our findings should be confirmed by further larger research.

The risk of mediastinitis and deep sternal wound infections with single and bilateral, pedicled and skeletonized internal thoracic arteries

Bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting may prolong survival in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients, but its use has been curtailed due to concerns of deep sternal wound infections (DSWI) resulting in mediastinitis. This article examines the association of single internal thoracic artery (SITA) and BITA grafting and the role of harvesting techniques with the development of DSWI in CABG patients. The development of DSWI following BITA grafting is multifactorial and is independent of the harvesting technique.

Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Bypass Grafting: Sternal Wound Infection in High-Risk Population. Should Sternal Infection Scare Us?

Background

Bilateral internal mammary arteries (BIMAs) remain underused in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), especially in elderly, diabetic, and obese patients. This study investigated incidence of sternal wound infection (SWI), sternal instability (SI), and reintervention for bleeding (RIB) in this high-risk population.

Methods

A single-center retrospective observational study was performed in "Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Gilly, Belgium." A total of 319 patients undergoing CABG from December 2011 to December 2015 were included. Three main outcome measures (SWI, SI, and RIB) were investigated in obese vs nonobese, diabetic vs nondiabetic, and elderly vs younger patients.

Results

In all, 14 SWI, 11 SI, and 6 RIB were discounted. Death rate was as follows: SWI: 2/14 vs 17/305 (P = .178), SI: 2/11 vs 17/308 (P = .081), and RIB: 2/6 vs 17/313 (P = .004). In obese (n = 113) vs nonobese (n = 206) patients, there was no difference for SWI (P = .263), SI (P = .565), and RIB (P = .332). In diabetic (n = 118) vs nondiabetic (n = 201) patients, there was no difference for SWI (P = .642), SI (P = .497), and RIB (P = .298). In elderly (n = 62) vs younger (n = 257) patients, there was no difference for SWI (P = .619), SI (P = .915), and RIB (P = .385).

Conclusions

Obesity, age, and diabetes treated by insulin (or not) do not seem to be risk factors for developing SWI, SI, or RIB in patients receiving a CABG using BIMA. Nevertheless, mortality was higher in RIB group.

Scoring system to guide decision making for the use of bilateral internal mammary arteries: The BIMA score

OBJECTIVE

Currently, surgeons are unable to estimate whether the survival benefit from bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) grafting outweighs the increased deep sternal infection (DSWI) risk in the individual cases. As a consequence BIMA grafting is still largely underutilized. We aimed to develop and validate a scoring system to predict the individual risk for DSWI and 10 year survival probability to guide surgeons in decision making process for the use of BIMA over single internal mammary artery (SIMA).

METHODS

Fast backward elimination on predictors was performed using Lawless and Singhal method. BIMA score was reported as a partial nomogram that can be used to manually obtain predicted individual risk of DSWI and 10 year survival probability from the regression models. Bootstrapping validation of the regression models was performed.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 5234 patients of which a total of 960 (18%) received BIMA and the remaining 4274 (82%) underwent conventional strategy using SIMA. A total of 119 patients experienced DSWI (2.3%). A total of 489 deaths were recorded after a median follow-up time of 5.68 years (interquartile range 2.7-8.8, range 0-12.1). BIMA grafting was found to have effect on both risk of DSWI and 10 year survival probability and was included into partial nomograms. Bootstrapping validation confirmed a good discriminative power of the models.

CONCLUSION

The BIMA score provides an impartial assessment of the decision making process for clinicians to establish the optimum revascularization strategy for individual patients.

Bilateral Versus Single Internal Thoracic Artery Grafts

Purpose of Review

Several advances have been made in recent years to improve outcome for patients with coronary artery disease. One of the most debated topics regarding surgical treatment with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is graft selection. This review aims to present the current status and scientific evidence for bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting.

Recent Findings

Observational studies and pooled analyses suggest that BITA grafting is associated with improved survival. Early results from a large randomized controlled trial report safety and efficacy of the method. The improved survival might be amplified in select groups, but with an increase in sternal wound-related complications. The benefit of BITA grafts seems to remain to an approximate age of 69 years at surgery.

Summary

CABG with BITA grafts is likely associated with improved long-term survival at a cost of an increase in sternal wound infections. Ten-year results from the Arterial Revascularization Trial are expected in 2018, providing the best evidence regarding the method yet. Early results show it is a safe method in most patient categories considerable for CABG.

Total arterial revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction - feasibility and outcomes

BACKGROUND

In acute situations such as acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with indication for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), total arterial revascularization (TAR) is often rejected in favour of saphenous vein (SV) grafting, which is assumed to allow for quicker vessel harvesting, a simpler anastomosis technique, and thus quicker revascularization and fewer bleeding complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether reluctance to apply TAR in AMI is still justified from a technical point of view in the current era and whether superiority of TAR results is also evident in emergency patients with AMI undergoing CABG.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis of 434 consecutive patients undergoing CABG for AMI with either TAR or with a combination of one internal mammary artery and SV grafts between 2008 and 2014, procedural data, short-term and mid-term outcome were compared. Propensity score matching of the groups was performed.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 250 patients were included in the analysis (TAR group: n = 98; SV group n = 152). The procedural time (TAR group: 211 min vs. SV group: 200 min, p = 0.46) did not differ between the groups. Erythrocyte transfusion rates were higher in the SV group (76% vs. 57%; p < 0.001). Rates of re-exploration for bleeding did not differ. Thirty-day mortality rates were comparable (TAR group: 3.4% vs. SV group: 4.5%, p = 0.68). Kaplan-Meier analysis until 7 years postoperatively revealed a tendency for improved survival after TAR (75% vs. 62%; log-rank p = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

TAR neither impairs rapid revascularization nor reduces its safety in patients with AMI. It may result in improved long-term outcome and should be preferred in the clinical setting of AMI.

European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery expert consensus statement on the prevention and management of mediastinitis

Mediastinitis continues to be an important and life-threatening complication after median sternotomy despite advances in prevention and treatment strategies, with an incidence of 0.25-5%. It can also occur as extension of infection from adjacent structures such as the oesophagus, airways and lungs, or as descending necrotizing infection from the head and neck. In addition, there is a chronic form of 'chronic fibrosing mediastinitis' usually caused by granulomatous infections. In this expert consensus, the evidence for strategies for treatment and prevention of mediatinitis is reviewed in detail aiming at reducing the incidence and optimizing the management of this serious condition.

One-year costs of bilateral or single internal mammary grafts in the Arterial Revascularisation Trial

OBJECTIVE

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using bilateral internal mammary arteries (BIMA) may improve survival over CABG using single internal mammary arteries (SIMA), but may be surgically more complex (and therefore costly) and associated with impaired sternal wound healing. We report, for the first time, a detailed comparison of healthcare resource use and costs over 12 months, as part of the Arterial Revascularisation (ART) Trial.

METHODS

3102 patients in 28 hospitals in seven countries were randomised to CABG surgery using BIMA (n=1548) or SIMA (n=1554). Detailed resource use data were collected covering surgery, the initial hospital episode, and for 12 months post randomisation. Using UK unit costs, total costs were calculated and compared between trial arms and for subgroups.

RESULTS

Patients randomised to BIMA spent 20 min longer in theatre (95% CI 15 to 25, p<0.001) and also required more treatment for sternal wound problems. Mean (SD) total costs per patient at 12 months were £13 839 (£10 534) for BIMA and £12 717 (£9719) for SIMA (mean cost difference £1122, 95% CI £407 to £1838, p=0.002). No tests for interaction between subgroups and treatment allocation were significant.

CONCLUSIONS

At 12 months from randomisation, mean costs were approximately 9% higher in BIMA than SIMA patients, primarily due to longer time in theatre and in-hospital stay, and slightly higher costs related to sternal wound problems during follow-up. Follow-up to the primary trial endpoint of 10 years will reveal whether longer-term differences emerge in graft patency or in overall survival.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Controlled-trials.com (ISRCTN46552265).

Bilateral vs unilateral internal mammary revascularization in patients with left ventricular dysfunction

AIM

To investigate the survival benefit of bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) grafts in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

METHODS

Between 1996 and 2009, we performed elective, isolated, primary, multiple cardiac arterial bypass grafting in 430 consecutive patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40%. The early and long-term results were compared between 167 patients undergoing BIMA grafting and 263 patients using left internal mammary artery (LIMA)-saphenous venous grafting (SVG).

RESULTS

The mean age of the overall population was 60.1 ± 15 years. In-hospital mortality was not different between the two groups (7.8% vs 10.3%, P = 0.49). Early postoperative morbidity included myocardial infarction (4.2% vs 3.8%, P = 0.80), stroke (1.2% vs 3.8%, P = 0.14), and mediastinitis (5.3% vs 2.3%, P = 0.11). At 8-year follow-up, Kaplan-Meier-estimated survival (74.2% vs 58.9%, P = 0.02) and Kaplan-Meier-estimated event-free survival (all cause deaths, myocardial infarction, stroke, target vessel revascularization, heart failure) (61.7% and 41.1%, P < 0.01) were significantly higher in the BIMA group compared with the LIMA-SVG group in univariate analysis. The propensity score matching analysis confirmed that BIMA grafting is a safe revascularization procedure but there was no long term survival (P = 0.40) and event-free survival (P = 0.13) in comparison with LIMA-SVG use.

CONCLUSION

Our longitudinal analysis suggests that BIMA grafting can be performed with acceptable perioperative mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

Trends in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting over the last decade

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact on hospital mortality and morbidity of extensive myocardial revascularization, using arterial grafts in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

Our prospective perioperative database was used to define two groups of patients who underwent isolated CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass, based on the years in which the operation was performed: Group A (2000-2003; 898 patients) and Group B (2009-2012; 1249 patients). The baseline and operative characteristics and outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Several significant changes in perioperative variables were observed. Group B included higher percentages of patients aged over 80 years (+58.1%), with diabetes (+32.0%) and with a history of percutaneous coronary intervention (+24.9%). The mean EuroSCORE II was significantly increased from 2.5 ± 4.4% in Group A to 3.2 ± 5.7% in Group B (P= 0.001). The mean number of distal anastomoses was significantly increased over time (total: 2.6 ± 0.8 vs 3.1 ± 1.0, P< 0.0001 and with arterial grafts: 1.6 ± 0.8 vs 2.6 ± 0.9, P< 0.0001). In-hospital mortality was low and did not significantly differ between Groups A and B (1.3 vs 2.4%; P= 0.08). Significant increases of new-onset atrial fibrillation (11.7 vs 21.9%, P= 0.017) and deep sternal infection (0.2 vs 1.1%, P= 0.017) were observed in Group B, compared with Group A. In multivariate analysis, extensive use of arterial grafts was not a risk factor of hospital mortality or sternal morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the increasing risk profiles of patients undergoing CABG, extensive myocardial revascularization using arterial grafts is associated with good early results.

Routine use of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in women: A risk factor analysis for poor outcomes

BACKGROUND

Concerns about increased risk of postoperative complications, primarily deep sternal wound infection (DSWI), prevent liberal use of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting in women. Consequently, outcomes after routine BITA grafting remain largely unexplored in female gender.

METHODS

Of 786 consecutive women with multivessel coronary disease who underwent isolated coronary bypass surgery at the authors' institution from 1999 throughout 2014, 477 (60.7%; mean age: 70±7.7years) had skeletonized BITA grafts; their risk profiles, operative data, hospital mortality and postoperative complications were reviewed retrospectively. Risk factor analysis for hospital death, DSWI and poor late outcomes were performed by means of multivariable models.

RESULTS

There were 19 (4%) hospital deaths (mean EuroSCORE II: 5.2±6.1%); glomerular filtration rate<50ml/min was an independent risk factor (p=0.035). Prolonged invasive ventilation (11.3%), multiple blood transfusion (12.1%) and DSWI (10.7%) were most frequent major postoperative complications. Predictors of DSWI were body mass index >35kg/m² (p=0.0094), diabetes (p=0.005), non-elective surgical priority (p=0.0087) and multiple blood transfusions (p=0.016). The mean follow-up was 6.8±4.5years. The non-parametric estimates of the 13-year freedom from cardiac and cerebrovascular deaths, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and repeat myocardial revascularization were 76.1 [95% confidence interval (CI): 73.1-79.1], 59.5 (95% CI: 55.9-63.1) and 91.9% (95% CI: 90.1-93.7), respectively. Preoperative congestive heart failure (p=0.04) and left main coronary artery disease (p=0.0095) were predictors of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.

CONCLUSIONS

BITA grafting could be performed routinely even in women. The increased rates of early postoperative complications do not prevent excellent late outcomes.

Potential Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection after Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in a Bahrain Cardiac Centre: A Retrospective, Case-Controlled Study

Objective:

The purposes of this study were to determine the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) and associated risk factors in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in our cardiac center during a 2-year period.

Materials and Methods:

Retrospective case-control analysis for 80 patients who underwent isolated cardiac surgery CABG. These patients were divided into the SSI study group (n = 40) and the noninfected control group (n = 40). Eight potential perioperative risk variables were compared between the two groups using univariate logistic regression analysis.

Results:

Univariate analysis was carried out for eight potential risk factors. The risk factors found to be significant were: Impaired estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.011) and impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (P = 0.015). However, Factors found to have no significant influence on the incidence of SSIs were: Perioperative length of hospital stay (days), urgency of surgery, use of bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) grafting, prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass duration, elevated body mass index.

Conclusions:

Patients with comorbidities of impaired renal function and/or impaired left ventricular systolic function are at high risk of developing SSI. There appears to be a relationship between SSIs in CABG patients and impaired renal or LV function (low ejection fraction). CABG with BIMA grafting could be performed safely even in diabetics. Future studies should consider further scrutiny of these and other factors in relation to SSIs in a larger surgical population.

The Impact of Diabetes on Early Outcomes after Routine Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting

BACKGROUND

Increased risk of postoperative complications limits use of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting in diabetic patients. The authors' experience in routine BITA grafting was reviewed to investigate the impact of diabetes on early outcomes.

METHODS

Among the 4508 consecutive patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who underwent isolated coronary bypass surgery from January 1999 throughout August 2015, skeletonised BITA grafts were used in 3228 (71.6%) patients, 972 diabetic and 2256 non-diabetic. After one-to-one propensity score (PS)-matched analysis, 819 pairs of diabetic/non-diabetic patients were compared for postoperative outcomes. The operative risk was calculated for each patient according to the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II).

RESULTS

Although diabetic had higher risk profiles than non-diabetic patients both in unmatched (EuroSCORE II: 5.3±7.3% vs. 3±4.2%, p<0.0001) and PS-matched series (EuroSCORE II: 5.1±7.1% vs. 3.6±4.3%, p<0.0001), there were no differences in hospital mortality (2.2% vs. 1.8%, p=0.52 and 2.1% vs. 2.3%, p=0.74, respectively). In PS-matched pairs, the use of adrenergic agonists (p=0.03), postoperative bleeding (p=0.0055) and deep incisional sternal wound infection (p=0.0018) were more frequent in diabetic patients who had a mean of longer hospital stays (p=0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting may be routinely performed even in diabetic patients despite higher risk profiles. Increased postoperative complications prolong hospital stay but do not impact on early mortality.

Reviewing hybrid coronary revascularization: challenges, controversies and opportunities

Two main approaches to myocardial revascularization currently exist, coronary artery bypass and percutaneous coronary intervention. In patients with advanced coronary artery disease, coronary artery bypass surgery is associated with improved long term outcomes while percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with lower periprocedural complications. A new approach has emerged in the last decade that attempts to reap the benefits of bypass surgery and stenting while minimizing the shortcomings of each approach. This new approach, hybrid coronary revascularization, has shown encouraging early results. Minimally invasive techniques for bypass surgery have played a large part of bringing this approach into contemporary practice.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines on Arterial Conduits for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Internal thoracic arteries (ITAs) should be used to bypass the left anterior descending (LAD) artery when bypass of the LAD is indicated (class of recommendation [COR] I, level of evidence [LOE] B). As an adjunct to left internal thoracic artery (LITA), a second arterial graft (right ITA or radial artery [RA]) should be considered in appropriate patients (COR IIa, LOE B). Use of bilateral ITAs (BITAs) should be considered in patients who do not have an excessive risk of sternal complications (COR IIa, LOE B). To reduce the risk of sternal infection with BITA, skeletonized grafts should be considered (COR IIa, LOE B), smoking cessation is recommended (COR I, LOE C), glycemic control should be considered (COR IIa, LOE B), and enhanced sternal stabilization may be considered (COR IIb, LOE C). As an adjunct to LITA to LAD (or in patients with inadequate LITA grafts), use of a RA graft is reasonable when grafting coronary targets with severe stenoses (COR IIa, LOE: B). When RA grafts are used, it is reasonable to use pharmacologic agents to reduce acute intraoperative and perioperative spasm (COR IIa, LOE C). The right gastroepiploic artery may be considered in patients with poor conduit options or as an adjunct to more complete arterial revascularization (COR IIb, LOE B). Use of arterial grafts (specific targets, number, and type) should be a part of the discussion of the heart team in determining the optimal approach for each patient (COR I, LOE C).

Assessment of the Association of Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Skeletonization and Sternal Wound Infection After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

BACKGROUND

Skeletonization is a technique of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) harvest that preserves sternal blood flow. We sought to identify the relationship of skeletonization and sternal wound infection in a population undergoing BITA harvest.

METHODS

Demographics and outcomes were recorded from patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery with BITA using either skeletonized (n = 531) or nonskeletonized (n = 970) techniques. The primary outcome was total infection. Propensity scores analysis as well as univariable and multivariable analysis was performed to determine the effect of skeletonization in the total cohort and in each sex.

RESULTS

Although patients undergoing skeletonized BITA had a lower body mass index, they were significantly older, with a higher proportion of women, diabetes mellitus, urgent or emergent surgery, renal failure, vascular and lung disease, and lower preoperative hemoglobin. There was a significant effect of skeletonization in decreasing total infection incidence (odds ratio [OR] 0.606, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.383 to 0.959, p = 0.032). The effect of skeletonization on total infection in men was more prominent (OR 0.466, 95% CI: 0.290 to 0.870), whereas there was no effect in women (OR 0.887, 95% CI: 0.441 to 1.786). Multivariable analysis confirmed that skeletonization was protective (OR 0.606, 95% CI: 0.383 to 0.957, p = 0.032). Other factors associated included being female (OR 3.327, 95% CI: 2.080 to 5.322, p < 0.001), insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (OR 2.638, 95% CI: 1.506 to 4.624, p = 0.001), peripheral vascular disease (OR 2.101, 95% CI: 1.247 to 3.539, p = 0.005), increased body mass index (OR 1.100, 95% CI: 1.054 to 1.149, p < 0.001), and decreased preoperative hemoglobin (OR 0.984, 95% CI: 0.972 to 0.997, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Skeletonization is associated with a significant protective effect with regard to sternal infection after coronary artery bypass graft surgery with BITA. Being female is a major risk factor for infection, and the risk is not modified significantly with a strategy of skeletonization in women.

Stable coronary artery disease: revascularisation and invasive strategies

Stable coronary artery disease is the most common clinical manifestation of ischaemic heart disease and a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Myocardial revascularisation is a mainstay in the treatment of symptomatic patients or those with ischaemia-producing coronary lesions, and reduces ischaemia to a greater extent than medical treatment. Documentation of ischaemia and plaque burden is fundamental in the risk stratification of patients with stable coronary artery disease, and several invasive and non-invasive techniques are available (eg, fractional flow reserve or intravascular ultrasound) or being validated (eg, instantaneous wave-free ratio and optical coherence tomography). The use of new-generation drug-eluting stents and arterial conduits greatly improve clinical outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). PCI is feasible, safe, and effective in many patients with stable coronary artery disease who remain symptomatic despite medical treatment. In patients with multivessel and left main coronary artery disease, the decision between PCI or CABG is guided by the local Heart Team (team of different cardiovascular specialists, including non-invasive and invasive cardiologists, and cardiac surgeons), who carefully judge the possible benefits and risks inherent to PCI and CABG. In specific subsets, such as patients with diabetes and advanced, multivessel coronary artery disease, CABG remains the standard of care in view of improved protection against recurrent ischaemic adverse events.