Proportionate or disproportionate secondary mitral regurgitation: how to untangle the Gordian knot?

Mitral Regurgitation "Proportionality" in Functional Mitral Regurgitation and Outcomes After Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Certain patients with functional mitral regurgitation survive longer with fewer heart failure hospitalizations after undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER); however, clinical markers identifying who will benefit have not been established. The 'proportionality' of mitral regurgitation (MR) severity compared to left ventricular size has been hypothesized to predict clinical outcome.

Methods

We sought to combine existing studies to compare outcomes between 'proportionate' MR and 'disproportionate' MR in patients undergoing TEER. PubMed and Medline were searched from January 2018 until May 2023. Data was extracted and synthesized by 2 independent authors using random effects models with risk ratios (RRs) for binary outcomes. The primary outcome was a combined endpoint of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization (ACM/HFH). Other outcomes of interest included ACM and residual >2+ MR after TEER.

Results

Six trials with a total of 1594 patients (mean age 71 years, 66% male) were included, which assessed MR proportionality using either a ratio of estimated regurgitant orifice area to left ventricular end-diastolic volume (EROA:LVEDV) or regurgitant fraction. Seven hundred and five (mean age 70 years, 75% male) were classified as proportionate MR, and 889 (mean age 72 years, 60% male) had disproportionate MR. There was no significant association between MR proportionality (by EROA:LVEDV) and ACM (RR 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-1.42). Proportionality did not significantly associate with ACM/HFH, though there were divergent effect signals when proportionality was measured by EROA:LVEDV (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.45-1.44) or regurgitant fraction (RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.53-4.11). Disproportionate MR showed a greater association with residual MR > 2+ post-TEER that did not meet statistical significance (RR 1.86, 95% CI 0.77-4.49).

Conclusions

In patients undergoing TEER for functional mitral regurgitation, MR proportionality was not significantly associated with ACM/HFH, all-cause mortality, or residual MR.

Expert proposal to analyze the combination of aortic and mitral regurgitation in multiple valvular heart disease by comprehensive echocardiography

The assessment of valvular pathologies in multiple valvular heart disease by echocardiography remains challenging. Data on echocardiographic assessment-especially in patients with combined aortic and mitral regurgitation-are rare in the literature. The proposed integrative approach using semi-quantitative parameters to grade the severity of regurgitation often yields inconsistent findings and results in misinterpretation. Therefore, this proposal aims to focus on a practical systematic echocardiographic analysis to understand the pathophysiology and hemodynamics in patients with combined aortic and mitral regurgitation. The quantitative approach of grading the regurgitant severity of each compound might be helpful in elucidating the scenario in combined aortic and mitral regurgitation. To this end, both the individual regurgitant fraction of each valve and the total regurgitant fraction of both valves must be determined. This work also outlines the methodological issues and limitations of the quantitative approach by echocardiography. Finally, we present a proposal that enables verifiable assessment of regurgitant fractions. The overall interpretation of echocardiographic results includes the symptomatology of patients with combined aortic and mitral regurgitation and the individual treatment options with respect to their individual risk. In summary, a reproducible, verifiable, and transparent in-depth echocardiographic investigation might ensure consistent hemodynamic plausibility of the quantitative results in patients with combined aortic and mitral regurgitation.

Valid and Reproducible Quantitative Assessment of Cardiac Volumes by Echocardiography in Patients with Valvular Heart Diseases-Possible or Wishful Thinking?

The analysis of left ventricular function is predominantly based on left ventricular volume assessment. Especially in valvular heart diseases, the quantitative assessment of total and effective stroke volumes as well as regurgitant volumes is necessary for a quantitative approach to determine regurgitant volumes and regurgitant fraction. In the literature, there is an ongoing discussion about differences between cardiac volumes estimated by echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance tomography. This viewpoint focuses on the feasibility to assess comparable cardiac volumes with both modalities. The former underestimation of cardiac volumes determined by 2D and 3D echocardiography is presumably explained by methodological and technical limitations. Thus, this viewpoint aims to stimulate an urgent and critical rethinking of the echocardiographic assessment of patients with valvular heart diseases, especially valvular regurgitations, because the actual integrative approach might be too error prone to be continued in this form. It should be replaced or supplemented by a definitive quantitative approach. Valid quantitative assessment by echocardiography is feasible once echocardiography and data analysis are performed with methodological and technical considerations in mind. Unfortunately, implementation of this approach cannot generally be considered for real-world conditions.

Quantification of primary mitral regurgitation by echocardiography: A practical appraisal

The accurate quantification of primary mitral regurgitation (MR) and its consequences on cardiac remodeling is of paramount importance to determine the best timing for surgery in these patients. The recommended echocardiographic grading of primary MR severity relies on an integrated multiparametric approach. It is expected that the large number of echocardiographic parameters collected would offer the possibility to check the measured values regarding their congruence in order to conclude reliably on MR severity. However, the use of multiple parameters to grade MR can result in potential discrepancies between one or more of them. Importantly, many factors beyond MR severity impact the values obtained for these parameters including technical settings, anatomic and hemodynamic considerations, patient's characteristics and echocardiographer' skills. Hence, clinicians involved in valvular diseases should be well aware of the respective strengths and pitfalls of each of MR grading methods by echocardiography. Recent literature highlighted the need for a reappraisal of the severity of primary MR from a hemodynamic perspective. The estimation of MR regurgitation fraction by indirect quantitative methods, whenever possible, should be central when grading the severity of these patients. The assessment of the MR effective regurgitant orifice area by the proximal flow convergence method should be used in a semi-quantitative manner. Furthermore, it is crucial to acknowledge specific clinical situations in MR at risk of misevaluation when grading severity such as late-systolic MR, bi-leaflet prolapse with multiple jets or extensive leak, wall-constrained eccentric jet or in older patients with complex MR mechanism. Finally, it is debatable whether the 4-grades classification of MR severity would be still relevant nowadays, since the indication for mitral valve (MV) surgery is discussed in clinical practice for patients with 3+ and 4+ primary MR based on symptoms, specific markers of adverse outcome and MV repair probability. Primary MR grading should be seen as a continuum integrating both quantification of MR and its consequences, even for patients with presumed “moderate” MR.

The Prognostic Role of Mitral Valve Regurgitation Severity and Left Ventricle Function in Acute Heart Failure

Aims: Data about the prognostic interplay between mitral regurgitation MR and left ventricular (LV) function in the outcome of patients admitted with acute heart failure (AHF) are scarce. We evaluated the prognostic impact of MR severity and LV function on mortality and on recurrent heart failure hospitalization (re-HFH) in patients admitted with AHF. Methods and Results: In total, 6843 patients admitted with AHF were evaluated: 2521 patients with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40% (reduced LVEF), 1238 of them (51%) having ≥moderate MR; and 4322 with LVEF > 40% (preserved LVEF), 1175 of them (27%) having ≥moderate MR. One-year mortality and re-HFH rates were higher in patients with ≥moderate MR unrelated to the baseline LV function (p = 0.028 and p < 0.001, respectively). After multivariable analysis, only reduced LVEF, and not the severity of MR, predicted mortality risk (HR: 1.31 [95% CI: 1.12−1.53] for patients with reduced LV function and ≤mild MR; HR: 1.44 [95% CI: 1.25−1.67] for patients with reduced LV function and ≥moderate MR); p < 0.001 for both. There was an increased risk for re-HFH in each group (HR: 1.35 [95% CI: 1.17−1.52] for patients with preserved LV function and ≥moderate MR; HR: 1.31 [95% CI: 1.15−1.51] for patients with reduced LV function and mild MR; and HR: 1.65 [95% CI: 1.45−1.88] for patients with reduced LV function and ≥moderate MR); p < 0.001 for all. Conclusions: In patients admitted with AHF, the LV function is the main prognostic determinant for mortality after 1 year. Significant (≥moderate) MR is associated with an increased risk of recurrent hospitalization.

Prognostic value of myocardial work and global longitudinal strain in patients with heart failure and functional mitral regurgitation

In patients with heart failure and functional mitral regurgitation (FMR), the assessment of left ventricular (LV) function is important for risk stratification and decision making. As LV ejection fraction (LVEF) might not be an optimal metric for LV systolic performance in this population, alternatives such as global longitudinal strain (GLS) and global myocardial work index (GWI) have been proposed. In the present study, we investigated the prognostic value of GLS and GWI and compared these measures to other LV systolic performance parameters. A prospective and consecutive cohort of 181 patients (median age 72 years, 76% male) with LVEF < 50% and FMR underwent comprehensive echocardiographic examination including speckle tracking echocardiography and grading of FMR severity. During a median follow-up of 42 months, 72 cardiovascular (CV) events occurred. In univariate analysis, LVEF, GLS, GWI, mitral S', LV outflow tract time velocity integral, forward LVEF and LV ejection time were associated with CV events. After multivariate adjustment only GLS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.884, p = 0.015) and GWI (HR = 0.927, p = 0.034) remained independently associated with CV events. There was no difference in the incremental prognostic value of GWI compared to GLS (delta -2 log likelihood = 0.8; p = 0.37). In this cohort of heart failure patients with FMR, GLS and GWI were independently associated with cardiovascular events, whereas other systolic performance parameters were not. However, GWI did not outperform GLS, and further research is required to determine the value of these strain-based measures in clinical practice.

Plausible Functional Diagnostics by Rational Echocardiography in the Assessment of Valvular Heart Disease - Role of Quantitative Echocardiography in the Assessment of Mitral Regurgitation

The echocardiographic assessment of valvular heart diseases is the basic analysis of valvular defects next to clinical investigation and stethoscopy. Severity of mitral regurgitation (MR) is usually estimated by an integrated approach using semi quantitative parameters and is still one of the biggest challenges of echocardiography. Quantitative echocardiographic analysis of MR severity often fails to describe comprehensible hemodynamic conditions. However, comprehensive echocardiography based on standardized image acquisition and proper image quality is required to properly assess hemodynamic parameter comparable to cardiac magnetic resonance tomography. This review focuses on the uncertainty of MR severity assessed by echocardiography in recent trials of interventional MR treatment. In addition, the necessity to provide plausible echocardiographic data for individual decision making is highlighted. In conclusion, plausible functional diagnostics by rational echocardiography is a prerequisite in patients with valvular heart diseases.

Echocardiographic assessment of mitral regurgitation: discussion of practical and methodologic aspects of severity quantification to improve diagnostic conclusiveness

The echocardiographic assessment of mitral valve regurgitation (MR) by characterizing specific morphological features and grading its severity is still challenging. Analysis of MR etiology is necessary to clarify the underlying pathological mechanism of the valvular defect. Severity of mitral regurgitation is often quantified based on semi-quantitative parameters. However, incongruent findings and/or interpretations of regurgitation severity are frequently observed. This proposal seeks to offer practical support to overcome these obstacles by offering a standardized workflow, an easy means to identify non-severe mitral regurgitation, and by focusing on the quantitative approach with calculation of the individual regurgitant fraction. This work also indicates main methodological problems of semi-quantitative parameters when evaluating MR severity and offers appropriateness criteria for their use. It addresses the diagnostic importance of left-ventricular wall thickness, left-ventricular and left atrial volumes in relation to disease progression, and disease-related complaints to improve interpretation of echocardiographic findings. Finally, it highlights the conditions influencing the MR dynamics during echocardiographic examination. These considerations allow a reproducible, verifiable, and transparent in-depth echocardiographic evaluation of MR patients ensuring consistent haemodynamic plausibility of echocardiographic results.