P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after coronary stenting according to type of P2Y12 inhibitor

Safety and Efficacy of Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in East Asian Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Treated with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

INTRODUCTION

The treatment strategy for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with ticagrelor has been controversial in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Our meta-analysis aimed to demonstrate whether intensified antithrombotic regimens with ticagrelor plus aspirin have more beneficial effects and fewer adverse events compared to those of clopidogrel plus aspirin in East Asian patients with ACS undergoing PCI.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Clinical Trials, Cochrane Library, and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of DAPT with ticagrelor or clopidogrel plus aspirin for secondary prevention of ACS in East Asian patients undergoing PCI. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as the metrics of choice for assessing treatment effects. The primary endpoint was bleeding events, and the secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs, including cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], and stroke), all-cause death, and definite/probable/possible stent thrombosis. The I2 index was used to assess heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Six RCTs involving a total of 2,725 patients met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of all bleeding events with ticagrelor was higher than that with clopidogrel (RR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.31-2.07), but the incidence of MACCE was not significantly different between the two groups (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.54-2.16). All-cause death (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.67-1.79), cardiovascular death (RR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.68-2.98), nonfatal MI (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.48-1.78), stroke (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.40-2.50), and stent thrombosis (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.19-2.98) were not statistically different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Ticagrelor increased the risk of bleeding and did not increase treatment efficacy compared to that of clopidogrel in the East Asian population who have ACS treated with PCI.

Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel Versus Ticagrelor for Stabilized Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results From a Real-World Registry in China

BACKGROUND

The first 3 months after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a high-risk period for adverse events, including ischemic and bleeding events, which decrease greatly with time. It is worth investigating whether the use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors is necessary after the early stage. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in clinical outcomes between clopidogrel and ticagrelor in stable patients without ischemic or major bleeding events during the first 3 months after PCI.

METHODS

Data for this study were obtained from the PHARM-ACS registry (NCT04184583). Patients who were free from ischemic and major bleeding events in the first 3 months after PCI were enrolled. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and Cox proportional hazards model were applied to compare the differences in clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were considered the primary end point, and major bleeding was considered the secondary end point.

RESULTS

A total of 6662 patients were included in this study. Of these, 3465 were treated with clopidogrel plus aspirin (clopidogrel group) and 3197 with ticagrelor plus aspirin (ticagrelor group). There were no significant differences in MACCE after IPTW adjustment for baseline variables (IPTW-adjusted HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.90-1.25) or major bleeding events (IPTW-adjusted HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.67-1.41) between the 2 groups. However, the incidence of minor bleeding in the clopidogrel group was significantly lower than that in the ticagrelor group (IPTW-adjusted HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.59-0.71).

CONCLUSION

In patients with ACS who were free from ischemic or major bleeding events during the first 3 months after PCI, the subsequent clopidogrel treatment might reduce minor bleeding events without increasing the risk of MACCE compared with ticagrelor. However, the results still need to be confirmed by large randomized controlled studies in the future.

P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

In patients with acute and chronic coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has been the cornerstone of pharmacotherapy for the past two decades. Although its antithrombotic benefit is well established, DAPT is associated with an increased risk of bleeding, which is independently associated with poor prognosis. The improvement of the safety profiles of drug-eluting stents has been critical in investigating and implementing shorter DAPT regimens. The introduction into clinical practice of newer generation oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitors such as prasugrel and ticagrelor, which provide more potent and predictable platelet inhibition, has questioned the paradigm of standard DAPT durations after coronary stenting. Over the last five years, several trials have assessed the safety and efficacy of P2Y₁₂ inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of DAPT in patients treated with PCI. Moreover, ongoing studies are testing the role of P2Y₁₂ inhibitor monotherapy immediately after PCI in selected patients. In this review, we provide up-to-date evidence on the efficacy and safety of P2Y₁₂ inhibitor monotherapy after a short period of DAPT compared to DAPT in patients undergoing PCI as well as outcomes associated with P2Y₁₂ inhibitor monotherapy compared to aspirin for long-term prevention.

2021 Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology Consensus Recommendations on the Use of P2Y12 Receptor Antagonists in the Asia-Pacific Region: Special Populations

Advanced age, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease not only increase the risk for ischaemic events in chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) but also confer a high bleeding risk during antiplatelet therapy. These special populations may warrant modification of therapy, especially among Asians, who have displayed characteristics that are clinically distinct from Western patients. Previous guidance has been provided regarding the classification of high-risk CCS and the use of newer-generation P2Y₁₂ inhibitors (i.e. ticagrelor and prasugrel) after acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in Asia. The authors summarise evidence on the use of these P2Y₁₂ inhibitors during the transition from ACS to CCS and among special populations. Specifically, they present recommendations on the roles of standard dual antiplatelet therapy, shortened dual antiplatelet therapy and single antiplatelet therapy among patients with coronary artery disease, who are either transitioning from ACS to CCS; elderly; or with chronic kidney disease, diabetes, multivessel coronary artery disease and bleeding events during therapy.