1
|
Georgiopoulos G, Kraler S, Mueller-Hennessen M, Delialis D, Mavraganis G, Sopova K, Wenzl FA, Räber L, Biener M, Stähli BE, Maneta E, Spray L, Iglesias JF, Coelho-Lima J, Tual-Chalot S, Muller O, Mach F, Frey N, Duerschmied D, Langer HF, Katus H, Roffi M, Camici GG, Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Spyridopoulos I, Lüscher TF, Stellos K, Stamatelopoulos K. Modification of the GRACE Risk Score for Risk Prediction in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes. JAMA Cardiol 2023; 8:946-956. [PMID: 37647046 PMCID: PMC10469286 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.2741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
Importance The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score, a guideline-recommended risk stratification tool for patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), does not consider the extent of myocardial injury. Objective To assess the incremental predictive value of a modified GRACE score incorporating high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) T at presentation, a surrogate of the extent of myocardial injury. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospectively designed longitudinal cohort study examined 3 independent cohorts of 9803 patients with ACS enrolled from September 2009 to December 2017; 2 ACS derivation cohorts (Heidelberg ACS cohort and Newcastle STEMI cohort) and an ACS validation cohort (SPUM-ACS study). The Heidelberg ACS cohort included 2535 and the SPUM-ACS study 4288 consecutive patients presenting with a working diagnosis of ACS. The Newcastle STEMI cohort included 2980 consecutive patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Data were analyzed from March to June 2023. Exposures In-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality risk estimates derived from an updated risk score that incorporates continuous hs-cTn T at presentation (modified GRACE). Main Outcomes and Measures The predictive value of continuous hs-cTn T and modified GRACE risk score compared with the original GRACE risk score. Study end points were all-cause mortality during hospitalization and at 30 days and 1 year after the index event. Results Of 9450 included patients, 7313 (77.4%) were male, and the mean (SD) age at presentation was 64.2 (12.6) years. Using continuous rather than binary hs-cTn T conferred improved discrimination and reclassification compared with the original GRACE score (in-hospital mortality: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.835 vs 0.741; continuous net reclassification improvement [NRI], 0.208; 30-day mortality: AUC, 0.828 vs 0.740; NRI, 0.312; 1-year mortality: AUC, 0.785 vs 0.778; NRI, 0.078) in the derivation cohort. These findings were confirmed in the validation cohort. In the pooled population of 9450 patients, modified GRACE risk score showed superior performance compared with the original GRACE risk score in terms of reclassification and discrimination for in-hospital mortality end point (AUC, 0.878 vs 0.780; NRI, 0.097), 30-day mortality end point (AUC, 0.858 vs 0.771; NRI, 0.08), and 1-year mortality end point (AUC, 0.813 vs 0.797; NRI, 0.056). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, using continuous rather than binary hs-cTn T at presentation, a proxy of the extent of myocardial injury, in the GRACE risk score improved the mortality risk prediction in patients with ACS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Georgiopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Vascular Biology and Medicine Theme, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Kraler
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Mueller-Hennessen
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Dimitrios Delialis
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios Mavraganis
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - Kateryna Sopova
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Vascular Biology and Medicine Theme, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Hemostaseology and Medical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Cardiovascular Research, European Center for Angioscience, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Cardiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Florian A. Wenzl
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lorenz Räber
- Department of Cardiology, Swiss Heart Center, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Moritz Biener
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Barbara E. Stähli
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eleni Maneta
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - Luke Spray
- Department of Cardiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Juan F. Iglesias
- Department of Cardiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jose Coelho-Lima
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Vascular Biology and Medicine Theme, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Tual-Chalot
- Biosciences Institute, Vascular Biology and Medicine Theme, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Olivier Muller
- Department of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - François Mach
- Department of Cardiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Norbert Frey
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Daniel Duerschmied
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Hemostaseology and Medical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- European Center for Angioscience, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Harald F. Langer
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Hemostaseology and Medical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- European Center for Angioscience, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Hugo Katus
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Marco Roffi
- Department of Cardiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Giovanni G. Camici
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian Mueller
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel and University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Evangelos Giannitsis
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ioakim Spyridopoulos
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Vascular Biology and Medicine Theme, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Department of Cardiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas F. Lüscher
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals and Imperial College and Kings College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Konstantinos Stellos
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Hemostaseology and Medical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Cardiovascular Research, European Center for Angioscience, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Biosciences Institute, Vascular Biology and Medicine Theme, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Kimon Stamatelopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Vascular Biology and Medicine Theme, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abo-Aly M, Shokri E, Chelvarajan L, Tarhuni WM, Tripathi H, Abdel-Latif A. Prognostic Significance of Activated Monocytes in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:11342. [PMID: 37511100 PMCID: PMC10378894 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241411342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Circulating monocytes have different subsets, including classical (CD14++CD16-), intermediate (CD14++CD16+), and nonclassical (CD14+CD16++), which play different roles in cardiovascular physiology and disease progression. The predictive value of each subset for adverse clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease is not fully understood. We sought to evaluate the prognostic efficacy of each monocyte subset in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We recruited 100 patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Blood samples were collected at the time of presentation to the hospital (within 6 h from onset of symptoms, baseline (BL)) and then at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h after presentation. Monocytes were defined as CD45+/HLA-DR+ and then subdivided based on the expression of CD14, CD16, CCR2, CD11b, and CD42. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, hospitalization for heart failure, stent thrombosis, in-stent restenosis, and recurrent myocardial infarction. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, including baseline comorbidities, were performed. The mean age of our cohort was 58.9 years and 25% of our patients were females. Patients with high levels (above the median) of CD14+CD16++ monocytes showed an increased risk for the primary endpoint in comparison to patients with low levels; adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for CD14+/CD16++ cells was 4.3 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.2-14.8, p = 0.02), for CD14+/CD16++/CCR2+ cells was 3.82 (95% CI 1.06-13.7, p = 0.04), for CD14+/CD16++/CD42b+ cells was 3.37 (95% CI 1.07-10.6, p = 0.03), for CD14+/CD16++/CD11b+ was 5.17 (95% CI 1.4-18.0, p = 0.009), and for CD14+ HLA-DR+ was 7.5 (95% CI 2.0-28.5, p = 0.002). CD14++CD16-, CD14++CD16+, and their CD11b+, CCR2+, and CD42b+ aggregates were not significantly predictive for our composite endpoint. Our study shows that CD14+ CD16++ monocytes and their subsets expressing CCR2, CD42, and CD11b could be important predictors of clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI. Further studies with a larger sample size and different coronary artery disease phenotypes are needed to verify the findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Abo-Aly
- Gill Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Elica Shokri
- Gill Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - Lakshman Chelvarajan
- Gill Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - Wadea M. Tarhuni
- Canadian Cardiac Research Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A2, Canada
| | - Himi Tripathi
- Gill Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Ahmed Abdel-Latif
- Gill Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shui X, Dong R, Wu Z, Chen Z, Wen Z, Tang L, Xie X, Chen L. Association of serum sclerostin and osteoprotegerin levels with the presence, severity and prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2022; 22:213. [PMID: 35546224 PMCID: PMC9092859 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-022-02654-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Bone-related proteins (such as sclerostin and osteoprotegerin [OPG]) are involved in the development of atherosclerosis. However, the relationship between bone-related proteins and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has not been extensively evaluated. The purpose of this study was to assess the association of serum sclerostin and OPG with the presence, severity and prognosis in patients with AMI. Methods This study prospectively enrolled 152 patients attacked by acute chest pain. Serum sclerostin and OPG were detected within the first 24 h after AMI diagnosis by ELISA kits. The AMI predictive efficacy of sclerostin and OPG were analyzed by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine the association between bone-related proteins and scores indicating the severity of coronary artery occlusion. Moreover, prognostic values were assessed by Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. Results There were 92 patients in AMI group, 60 in non-AMI group. Serum levels of sclerostin and OPG were significantly higher in AMI group than in non-AMI group (all p < 0.001), which showed predictive value for the presence of AMI (all p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve values of sclerostin and OPG were 0.744 and 0.897, respectively. A multivariable linear regression analysis demonstrated that Ln-transformed sclerostin (β = 0.288, p = 0.009) and Ln-transformed OPG (Ln-OPG: β = 0.295, p = 0.019) levels were associated with GENISINI score, independently of conventional clinical parameters. In addition, Ln-OPG levels were still positively associated with GRACE score after adjustments (β = 0.320, p = 0.001). During a 1-year follow-up, patients above the median of sclerostin levels had higher incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) than those below the median (p = 0.028). It was also observed that the MACE rates were higher in patients above the median of OPG levels, though no statistic importance (p = 0.060). After adjusting conventional risk factors by multivariate Cox regression, Ln-OPG was associated with incident MACE (hazard ratio = 2.188 [95% confidence intervals 1.102–4.344], p = 0.025). Conclusions Bone-related proteins could exert a potential role in early risk stratification and prognosis assessment in patients with AMI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xing Shui
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital, SunYat-Sen University, No. 600, Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, China
| | - Ruimin Dong
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital, SunYat-Sen University, No. 600, Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, China
| | - Zhen Wu
- Department of Cardiac Care Unit, The Third Affiliated Hospital, SunYat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zefeng Chen
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital, SunYat-Sen University, No. 600, Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, China
| | - Zheqi Wen
- Department of Cardiac Care Unit, The Third Affiliated Hospital, SunYat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Leile Tang
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital, SunYat-Sen University, No. 600, Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, China
| | - Xujing Xie
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital, SunYat-Sen University, No. 600, Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
| | - Lin Chen
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital, SunYat-Sen University, No. 600, Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
| |
Collapse
|