Efficacy and safety of diuretics in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a scoping review

Advance in the pharmacological and comorbidities management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: evidence from clinical trials

The prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for approximately 50% of the total heart failure population, and with the aging of the population and the increasing prevalence of hypertension, obesity, and type 2 diabetes (T2DM), the incidence of HFpEF continues to rise and has become the most common subtype of heart failure. Compared with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, HFpEF has a more complex pathophysiology and is more often associated with hypertension, T2DM, obesity, atrial fibrillation, renal insufficiency, pulmonary hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, and other comorbidities. HFpEF has generally been considered a syndrome with high phenotypic heterogeneity, and no effective treatments have been shown to reduce mortality to date. Diuretics and comorbidity management are traditional treatments for HFpEF; however, they are mostly empirical due to a lack of clinical evidence in the setting of HFpEF. With the EMPEROR-Preserved and DELIVER results, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors become the first evidence-based therapies to reduce rehospitalization for heart failure. Subgroup analyses of the PARAGON-HF, TOPCAT, and CHARM-Preserved trials suggest that angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, spironolactone, and angiotensin II receptor blockers may be beneficial in patients at the lower end of the ejection fraction spectrum. Other potential pharmacotherapies represented by non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists finerenone and antifibrotic agent pirfenidone also hold promise for the treatment of HFpEF. This article intends to review the clinical evidence on current pharmacotherapies of HFpEF, as well as the comorbidities management of atrial fibrillation, hypertension, T2DM, obesity, pulmonary hypertension, renal insufficiency, obstructive sleep apnea, and iron deficiency, to optimize the clinical management of HFpEF.

Empagliflozin-A Sodium Glucose Co-transporter-2 Inhibitor: Overview ofits Chemistry, Pharmacology, and Toxicology

BACKGROUND

Empagliflozin is a sodium glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor that has gained significant attention in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Understanding its chemistry, pharmacology, and toxicology is crucial for the safe and effective use of this medication.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the chemistry, pharmacology, and toxicology of empagliflozin, synthesizing the available literature to present a concise summary of its properties and implications for clinical practice.

METHODS

A systematic search of relevant databases was conducted to identify studies and articles related to the chemistry, pharmacology, and toxicology of empagliflozin. Data from preclinical and clinical studies, as well as post-marketing surveillance reports, were reviewed to provide a comprehensive understanding of the topic.

RESULTS

Empagliflozin is a selective SGLT2 inhibitor that works by constraining glucose reabsorption in the kidneys, causing increased urinary glucose elimination. Its unique mechanism of action provides glycemic control, weight reduction, and blood pressure reduction. The drug's chemistry is characterized by its chemical structure, solubility, and stability. Pharmacologically, empagliflozin exhibits favorable pharmacokinetic properties with rapid absorption, extensive protein binding, and renal elimination. Clinical studies have demonstrated its efficacy in improving glycemic control, reducing cardiovascular risks, and preserving renal function. However, adverse effects, for instance, urinary tract infections, genital infections, and diabetic ketoacidosis have been reported. Toxicological studies indicate low potential for organ toxicity, mutagenicity, or carcinogenicity.

CONCLUSION

Empagliflozin is a promising SGLT2 inhibitor that offers an innovative approach to the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Its unique action mechanism and favorable pharmacokinetic profile contribute to its efficacy in improving glycemic control and reducing cardiovascular risks. While the drug's safety profile is generally favorable, clinicians should be aware of potential adverse effects and monitor patients closely. More study is required to determine the longterm safety and explore potential benefits in other patient populations. Overall, empagliflozin represents a valuable addition to the armamentarium of antidiabetic medications, offering significant benefits to patients suffering from type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study covers all aspects of empagliflozin, including its history, chemistry, pharmacology, and various clinical studies, case reports, and case series.

Effects of Empagliflozin on Diuretics Reduction in Outpatient Heart Failure Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Inhibitors of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2i) reduce the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HF). We aimed to examine the effect of empagliflozin on change of diuretics dose in outpatient HF patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 612 patients who were treated using both empagliflozin and diuretics. We excluded patients who did not meet the criteria for HF. Dose and duration of empagliflozin and diuretics were measured.

RESULTS

Of 612 patients, a total of 251 was analyzed and followed for a mean 430.0±175.4 days. The mean age was 69.3, 51.8% were female, and 93.2% had type 2 diabetes. The distribution of initial diuretics type when starting empagliflozin showed that furosemide comprised 24.7%, spironolactone 20.7%, thiazide 36.9%, and others. Total 23.1% of patients reduced diuretic dose, 13.1% increased diuretic dose, 41.4% continued at the same diuretic dose, and 22.3% switched to different diuretics. Among patients who were using furosemide, 36.0% reduced diuretics dose. There was a diuretic reduction in 22.6% of HF preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≥50%) and in 26.5% of HF reduced EF (HFrEF, LVEF <50%). The average doses furosemide at the start of empagliflozin decreased from 16.3mg/day to 8.5mg/day at the time of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Among outpatient clinic HF patients treated with both diuretics and empagliflozin, 23.1% of patients had their diuretics reduced, and the mean dose of furosemide was reduced by about half. This suggests that empagliflozin has clinical advantages in managing outpatient HF patients.