Sudden cardiac death and left ventricular ejection fraction during long-term follow-up after acute myocardial infarction in the primary percutaneous coronary intervention era: results from the HIJAMI-II registry

Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion over systolic pulmonary artery pressure prognostic value for in-hospital adverse events in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome

AIMS

Although several studies have shown that the right ventricular to pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling, assessed by the ratio between tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (TAPSE/sPAP) using echocardiography, is strongly associated with cardiovascular events, its prognostic value is not established in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We aimed to assess the in-hospital prognostic value of TAPSE/sPAP among patients hospitalized for ACS in a retrospective analysis from the prospective ADDICT-ICCU study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 481 consecutive patients hospitalized in intensive cardiac care unit [mean age 65 ± 13 years, 73% of male, 46% ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)] for ACS [either STEMI or non-STEMI (NSTEMI)] with TAPSE/sPAP available were included in this prospective French multicentric study (39 centres). The primary outcome was in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) defined as all-cause death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or cardiogenic shock and occurred in 33 (7%) patients. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 0.55 mm/mmHg as the best TAPSE/sPAP cut-off to predict in-hospital MACEs. TAPSE/sPAP <0.55 was associated with in-hospital MACEs, even after adjustment with comorbidities [odds ratio (OR): 19.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.78-54.8], clinical severity including left ventricular ejection fraction (OR: 14.4, 95% CI 5.70-41.7), and propensity-matched population analysis (OR: 22.8, 95% CI 7.83-97.2, all P < 0.001). After adjustment, TAPSE/sPAP <0.55 showed the best improvement in model discrimination and reclassification above traditional prognosticators (C-statistic improvement: 0.16; global χ2 improvement: 52.8; likelihood ratio test P < 0.001) with similar results for both STEMI and NSTEMI subgroups.

CONCLUSION

A low RV-PA coupling defined as TAPSE/sPAP ratio <0.55 was independently associated with in-hospital MACEs and provided incremental prognostic value over traditional prognosticators in patients hospitalized for ACS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05063097.

Multicenter prospective observational study to clarify the current status and clinical outcome in Japanese patients who have an indication for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) (TRANSITION JAPAN-ICD/WCD study): Rationale and design of a prospective, multicenter, observational, comparative study

Background

Despite the positive impact of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and wearable cardioverter defibrillators (WCDs) on prognosis, their implantation is often withheld especially in Japanese heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) who have not experienced ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) for uncertain reasons. Recent advancements in heart failure (HF) medications have significantly improved the prognosis for HFrEF. Given this context, a critical reassessment of the treatment and prognosis of ICDs and WCDs is essential, as it has the potential to reshape awareness and treatment strategies for these patients.

Methods

We are initiating a prospective multicenter observational study for HFrEF patients eligible for ICD in primary and secondary prevention, and WCD, regardless of device use, including all consenting patients. Study subjects are to be enrolled from 31 participant hospitals located throughout Japan from April 1, 2023, to December 31, 2024, and each will be followed up for 1 year or more. The planned sample size is 651 cases. The primary endpoint is the rate of cardiac implantable electronic device implementation. Other endpoints include the incidence of VT/VF and sudden death, all-cause mortality, and HF hospitalization, other events. We will collect clinical background information plus each patient's symptoms, Clinical Frailty Scale score, laboratory test results, echocardiographic and electrocardiographic parameters, and serial changes will also be secondary endpoints.

Results

Not applicable.

Conclusion

This study offers invaluable insights into understanding the role of ICD/WCD in Japanese HF patients in the new era of HF medication.

Sudden cardiac death in long-term follow-up in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Objective. Most studies analyzing predictors of sudden cardiac death (SCD) after acute myocardial infarction included only high-risk patients or index reperfusion had not been performed in all patients. The aim of our study was to analyze the incidence of SCD and determine the predictors of SCD occurrence during 6-year follow-up of unselected patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Method. we analysed 3114 STEMI patients included included in the University Clinical Center of Serbia STEMI Register. Patients presenting with cardiogenic schock were excluded. Echocardiographic examination was performed before hospital discharge. Results. During 6-year follow-up, lethal outcome was registered in 297 (9.5%) patients, of whom 95 (31.9%) had SCD. The highest incidence of SCD was recorded in the first year of follow-up, when SCD was registered in 25 patients, which is 26.3% of the total number of patients who had had SCD, i.e. 0.8% of the patients analyzed. The independent predictors for the occurrence of SCD during 6-year follow-up were EF < 45% (HR 3.07, 95% 1.87-5.02), post-procedural TIMI flow <3 (HR 2.59, 95%CI 1.37-5.14), reduced baseline kidney function (HR 1.87, 95%CI 1.12-2.93) and Killip class >1 at admission (HR 1.69, 95%CI 1.23-2.97). Conclusion. There is a low incidence of SCD in unselected STEMI patients treated with primary PCI. Predictors of SCD occurence during long-term follow-up in analyzed patients are clinical variables that are easily recorded during index hospitalization and include: EF ≤45%, post-procedural flow TIMI < 3, Killip class >1, and reduced baseline kidney function.

Use of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators for Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death in Asia

The effectiveness of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) is well established. However, there are several unsolved problems related to ICD use for primary prevention in Asia, including ICD underuse, population differences in underlying heart disease, and the rate of appropriate ICD therapy compared with Western countries. Although the prevalence of ischemic cardiomyopathy in Asia is lower than in Europe and the United States, the mortality rate of Asian patients with ischemic heart disease has been increasing recently. As for the use of ICDs for primary prevention, there have been no randomized clinical trials, and limited data are available in Asia. This review focuses on the unmet needs related to ICD use for primary prevention in Asia.

Construction and evaluation of nomogram model for individualized prediction of risk of major adverse cardiovascular events during hospitalization after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Background

Emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) helps to reduce the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) such as death, cardiogenic shock, and malignant arrhythmia, but in-hospital MACEs may still occur after emergency PCI, and their mortality is significantly increased once they occur. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk factors associated with MACE during hospitalization after PCI in STEMI patients, construct a nomogram prediction model and evaluate its effectiveness.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 466 STEMI patients admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to June 2022. According to the occurrence of MACE during hospitalization, they were divided into MACE group (n = 127) and non-MACE group (n = 339), and the clinical data of the two groups were compared; least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used to screen out the predictors with non-zero coefficients, and multivariate Logistic regression was used to analyze STEMI Independent risk factors for in-hospital MACE in patients after emergency PCI; a nomogram model for predicting the risk of in-hospital MACE in STEMI patients after PCI was constructed based on predictive factors, and the C-index was used to evaluate the predictive performance of the prediction model; the Bootstrap method was used to repeat sampling 1,000 Internal validation was carried out for the second time, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used to evaluate the model fit, and the calibration curve was drawn to evaluate the calibration degree of the model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to evaluate the efficacy of the nomogram model and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) score in predicting in-hospital MACE in STEMI patients after acute PCI.

Results

The results of LASSO regression showed that systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, Killip grade II-IV, urea nitrogen and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), IABP, NT-ProBNP were important predictors with non-zero coefficients, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze that Killip grade II-IV, urea nitrogen, LVEF, and NT-ProBNP were independent factors for in-hospital MACE after PCI in STEMI patients; a nomogram model for predicting the risk of in-hospital MACE after PCI in STEMI patients was constructed with the above independent predictors, with a C-index of 0.826 (95% CI: 0.785-0.868) having a good predictive power; the results of H-L goodness of fit test showed χ² = 1.3328, P = 0.25, the model calibration curve was close to the ideal model, and the internal validation C-index was 0.818; clinical decision analysis also showed that the nomogram model had a good clinical efficacy, especially when the threshold probability was 0.1-0.99, the nomogram model could bring clinical net benefits to patients. The nomogram model predicted a greater AUC (0.826) than the TIMI score (0.696) for in-hospital MACE after PCI in STEMI patients.

Conclusion

Urea nitrogen, Killip class II-IV, LVEF, and NT-ProBNP are independent factors for in-hospital MACE after PCI in STEMI patients, and nomogram models constructed based on the above factors have high predictive efficacy and feasibility.

The Prognostic Value of Echocardiographic Wall Motion Score Index in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background

When compared to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), previous studies have suggested the superiority of wall motion score index (WMSI) in predicting cardiac events in patients who have suffered acute myocardial infarction. However, there are limited studies assessing WMSI and mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to compare the prognostic value of WMSI in a cohort of STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

A comparison of WMSI, LVEF, and all-cause mortality in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI between January 2008 and December 2020 was performed. The prognostic value of WMSI, LVEF, and traditional risk scores (TIMI, GRACE) were compared using multivariable logistic regression modelling.

Results

Among 1181 patients, 27 died within 30-days (2.3%) and 49 died within 12 months (4.2%). WMSI ≥1.8 was associated with poorer survival at 12-months (9.2% vs 1.5%; p < 0.001). When used as the only classifier for predicting 12-month mortality, the discriminatory ability of WMSI (area under the curve (AUC): 0.77; 95% CI: 0.68–0.84) was significantly better than LVEF (AUC: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.61–0.79; p=0.034). After multivariable modelling, the AUC was comparable between models with either WMSI (AUC: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.85–0.94) or LVEF (AUC: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.83–0.92; p < 0.08) yet performed significantly better than TIMI (AUC: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.62–0.79; p < 0.001), or GRACE (AUC: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.54–0.71; p < 0.001) risk scores.

Conclusions

When examined individually, WMSI is a superior predictor of 12-month mortality over LVEF in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI. When examined in multivariable predictive models, WMSI and LVEF perform very well at predicting 12-month mortality, especially when compared to existing STEMI risk scores.

Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Is a Risk for Sudden Cardiac Death in the Early Period After Hospital Discharge in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

The incidence of sudden cardiac death (SCD) after discharge in Japanese acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study population included 1,429 AMI patients (199 with LVEF ≤35% and 1,230 with LVEF >35%) admitted to the Hirosaki University Hospital, treated with primary PCI within 12 h after onset, and survived to discharge. LVEF was evaluated in all patients before discharge, and the patients were followed up for a mean of 2.6±0.8 years. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed LVEF ≤35% was associated with all-cause death and SCD. The incidence of SCD was 2.6% at 1 year and 3.1% at 3 years in patients with LVEF ≤35%, whereas it was 0.1% at 1 year and 0.3% at 3 years in patients with LVEF >35%. Sixty-seven percent of SCDs in patients with LVEF ≤35% occurred within 4 months after discharge, and the events became less frequent after this period. A Cox proportional hazard model indicated LVEF ≤35% as an independent predictor for all-cause death and SCD.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of SCD was relatively low in Japanese AMI patients treated with primary PCI, even in patients with LVEF ≤35% upon discharge. Careful management of patients with reduced LVEF is required to prevent SCD, especially in the early phase after discharge.

Severe Impairment of Left Ventricular Regional Strain in STEMI Patients Is Associated with Post-Infarct Remodeling

Background: Measures of global left ventricular (LV) systolic function have limitations for the prediction of post-infarct LV remodeling (LVR). Therefore, we tested the association between a new measure of regional LV systolic function—the percentage of severely altered strain (%SAS)- and LVR after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). As a secondary objective, we also evaluated the association between %SAS and clinical events during follow-up. Methods: Of 177 patients undergoing echocardiography within 24 h from primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty, 172 were studied for 3 months, 167 for 12 months, and 10 died. The %SAS was calculated by dividing the number of LV myocardial segments with ≥−5% peak systolic longitudinal strain by the total number of segments. LVR was defined as the increase in end-diastolic volume >20% at its first occurrence compared to baseline. Results: LVR percentage was 10.2% and 15.8% at 3 and 12 months, respectively. Based on univariable analysis, a number of clinical, laboratory, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic variables were associated with LVR. Based on multivariable analysis, %SAS and TnI peak remained associated with LVR (for %SAS 5% increase, OR 1.226, 95% CI 1.098−1.369, p < 0.0005; for TnI peak, OR 1.025, 95% CI 1.004−1.047, p = 0.022). %SAS and LVR were also associated with occurrence of clinical events at a median follow-up of 43 months (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.0−1.04, p = 0.0165). Conclusions: In patients treated for acute STEMI, acute %SAS is associated with post-infarct LVR. Therefore, we suggest performing such evaluations on a routine basis to identify, as early as possible, STEMI patients at higher risk.

Primary results from the Japanese Heart Failure and Sudden Cardiac Death Prevention Trial (HINODE)

Aims

The HINODE study aimed to analyse rates of mortality, appropriately treated ventricular arrhythmias (VA), and heart failure in Japanese patients and compared with those in Western patients.

Methods and results

After treatment decisions following contemporary practice in Japan, patients were prospectively enrolled into four cohorts: (i) internal cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD), (ii) cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) defibrillator (CRT‐D), (iii) standard medical therapy (‘non‐device’: ND), or (iv) pacing (indicated for CRT; received pacemaker or CRT pacing). Cohorts 1–3 required a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, a history of heart failure, and a need for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death based on two to five previously identified risk factors. Endpoint outcomes were adjudicated by the independent committees. ICD and CRT‐D cohorts, considered as high‐voltage (HV) cohorts, were pooled for Kaplan–Meier analysis and propensity‐matched to Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial‐Reduce Inappropriate Therapy (MADIT‐RIT) arm B and C patients. The study enrolled 354 patients followed for 19.6 ± 6.5 months, with a minimum of 12 months. Propensity‐matched HV cohorts showed comparable VA (P = 0.61) and mortality rates (P = 0.29) for HINODE and MADIT‐RIT. The ND cohort presented a high crossover rate to ICD therapy (6.1%, n = 7/115), and the CRT‐D cohort showed elevated mortality rates. The pacing cohort revealed that patients implanted with pacemakers had higher mortality (26.0%) than those with CRT‐Pacing (8.4%, P = 0.05).

Conclusions

The mortality and VA event rates of landmark trials are applicable to patients with primary prevention in Japan. Patients who did not receive guideline‐indicated CRT devices had poor outcomes.

Incidence and predictors of early and late sudden cardiac death in hospitalized Japanese patients with new-onset systolic heart failure

BACKGROUND

Patients with heart failure (HF) and low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are at high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Optimal HF treatment can improve LVEF and reduce the risk of SCD. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and predictors of SCD in Japanese patients with new-onset systolic HF and to investigate factors that affect LVEF improvement.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 174 consecutive hospitalized patients with new-onset HF and LVEF ≤35% (median age, 66 years; men, 71%). The primary outcome was a composite of SCD, sustained ventricular arrhythmias, and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy.

RESULTS

The cumulative rates of meeting of the primary outcome at 3, 12, and 36 months after discharge were 3.9%, 8.1%, and 10.5%, respectively. Atrial fibrillation was a significant predictor of the primary outcome within 12 months after discharge (odds ratio, 5.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60-21.57). Among 104 patients who completed follow-up echocardiography within 12 months after discharge, changes in LVEF were inversely associated with SCD (odds ratio/1% increase, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.93). A QRS duration <130 ms and a B-type natriuretic peptide level <170 pg/mL were predictors of LVEF improvement to >35% (odds ratio, 3.69; 95% CI, 1.15-11.77; odds ratio, 3.19; 95% CI, 1.33-7.69, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed a high incidence of meeting of the primary outcome within 12 months after discharge in hospitalized patients with new-onset systolic HF. An improved LVEF may reduce the risk of late SCD.

Rationale and design of the HINODE study: Heart failure indication and sudden cardiac death prevention trial Japan

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials in Western countries have provided evidence that prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy reduces mortality in heart failure (HF) patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. However, the risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in Japanese HF patients sharing similar risk factors is still unknown.

METHODS

The Heart Failure Indication and Sudden Cardiac Death Prevention Trial Japan trial (NCT03185832) is a prospective, multicenter registry designed to collect data on ventricular arrhythmia, HF events, and mortality in Japanese HF patients. Japanese patients with HF and 2-5 predefined risk factors who were indicated for cardiac device implantation based on European Society of Cardiology guidelines were enrolled in four treatment arms: implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D), HF pacing (PA; Pacemaker and cardiac resynchronization pacemaker), and nondevice (ND) cohorts and followed for a minimum of 12 months. Since it is anticipated that some baseline patient characteristics and risk factors will differ significantly from those reported in predominantly Western populations, event rates will be compared to a propensity-matched population from the MADIT RIT trial. Primary endpoints are composite rates of first appropriately treated ventricular arrhythmias (VA) or/and life-threatening VA symptoms for the ICD and CRT-D cohorts. For nondevice and PA cohorts, the primary outcome is all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The Heart Failure Indication and Sudden Cardiac Death Prevention Trial Japan is a large prospective multicenter registry with defined device treatment cohorts and will provide data for risk stratification for cardiovascular events in Japanese HF patients.

Factors that predict ventricular arrhythmias in the late phase after acute myocardial infarction

Aims

Little is known regarding factors that predict the occurrence of lethal ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) occurring after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This observational cohort study aimed to identify factors that predicted lethal VAs during the late phase after AMI in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Methods and results

Data were collected from our AMI database regarding consecutive patients with an LVEF of ≤40% after AMI (January 2012 to July 2018). The ‘late phase’ was defined as ≥7 days after AMI onset, and the primary endpoint was defined as lethal VAs in the late phase. The study included 136 patients (82% men; mean age: 66 ± 13 years). The average LVEF at admission was 32.7 ± 8.2%. During a mean follow‐up period of 20.7 months, 14 patients (10%) experienced lethal VAs, including ventricular fibrillation (n = 8) and sustained ventricular tachycardia (n = 10). Univariate analyses revealed that lethal VAs were predicted by age and LVEF at admission. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that the optimal cut‐off value was 23% for using the LVEF at admission to predict the primary endpoint (area under the curve: 0.77, P < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis also demonstrated that LVEF at admission was an independent predictor of the primary endpoint (risk ratio = 7.12, P = 0.001).

Conclusions

Lethal VAs in the late phase are common in patients with AMI, and reduced LVEF and cardiac function at admission play a significant role in the risk stratification for future lethal VAs in this population.

Comparison of 2-year outcomes between primary and secondary prophylactic use of defibrillators in patients with coronary artery disease: A prospective propensity score-matched analysis from the Nippon Storm Study

BACKGROUND

The Nippon Storm Study was a prospective observational study designed to gather clinical data on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in Japanese patients.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this subanalysis was to compare the incidence of ICD therapy in patients with left ventricular dysfunction owing to coronary artery disease (CAD) for primary and secondary prophylaxis of sudden cardiac death.

METHODS

We analyzed data of 493 patients with CAD and ICDs (men, 87%; age, 68 ± 10 years; left ventricular ejection fraction, 36% ± 13%; primary prophylaxis, 36%). All patients were followed up for at least 2 years. Propensity score matching was used to select patient subgroups for comparison: 133 patients with ICD for primary prophylaxis and 133 with ICD for secondary indications.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between primary and secondary prophylaxis groups with respect to the incidence of appropriate ICD therapy within 2 years (0.153 vs 0.239; hazard ratio, 1.565 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.898-2.727]; P = .114). Two-year electrical storm risks were 3.3% and 9.6% with HR = 3.236 (95% CI, 1.058-9.896; P = .039) in patients with primary and secondary prophylaxis, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of ICD therapy received by patients with CAD for primary and secondary prophylaxis was not significantly different based on our propensity score-matched analysis. However, secondary-prophylaxis ICD therapy seems to be associated with a significantly higher risk for electrical storm than primary-prophylaxis ICD therapy.

Prognosis of Japanese Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Who Underwent Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation - The JID-CAD Study

Background: There has been no large multicenter clinical trial on the prognosis of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) in Japanese patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of the present study was to compare differences in the prognoses of Japanese patients with CAD between primary and secondary prevention, and to identify potential predictors of prognosis.

Methods and Results: We investigated 392 CAD patients (median age 69 years, 90% male) treated with ICD/CRT-D enrolled in the Japan Implantable Devices in CAD (JID-CAD) Registry. The primary endpoint was all-cause death, and the secondary endpoint was appropriate ICD therapies. Endpoints were assessed by dividing patients into primary prevention (n=165) and secondary prevention (n=227) groups. The mean (±SD) follow-up period was 2.1±0.9 years. The primary endpoint was similar in the 2 groups (P=0.350).

Conclusions: The mortality rate in Japanese patients with CAD who underwent ICD/CRT-D implantation as primary prevention was not lower than that of patients who underwent ICD/CRT-D implantation as secondary prevention, despite the lower cardiac function in the patients undergoing ICD/CRT-D implantation as primary prevention.

Factors associated with return to work following myocardial infarction: A systematic review of observational studies

OBJECTIVES

To identify and critically synthesise literature on return to work of patients following a myocardial infarction and to identify factors that are associated with this.

BACKGROUND

Understanding when patients return to work after myocardial infarction and what factors are associated with this may be helpful in designing person-centred treatment plans to facilitate patients' rehabilitation and return to work.

DESIGN

A narrative systematic review.

REVIEW METHODS

Six databases, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Academic Search Complete, EMBASE, SCOPUS and ProQuest Health and Medicine, and the search engine Google were searched to retrieve peer-reviewed articles published in English from January 2008-January 2020. In total, 22,217 papers were sourced and screened, with 18 papers retained for quality appraisal using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools.

RESULTS

The mean time to return to work varied between 46-192 days; about half the participants resumed work by 3 months. Patients who were male, younger, educated, non-manual workers or owned their own business, and those who evaluated their general and mental health highly, and had shorter hospitalisation, fewer comorbidities, complications and mental health issues were more likely to return to work after myocardial infarction.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Findings may help nurses detect patients at increased risk of failure to return to work and provide appropriate support to facilitate this.

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: An Observation from the KCHF Registry

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear the clinical characteristics and prognosis of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) on prevention for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in Japanese patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We investigated the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and clinical outcomes in a contemporary large-scale Japanese ADHF registry.

METHODS

Among the consecutive 3785 patients hospitalized for ADHF and discharged alive in the Kyoto Congestive Heart Failure registry, we identified 1409 patients with reduced LVEF (ICD: N = 115, non-ICD: N = 1294).

RESULTS

Patients in the ICD group were younger (69.3 ± 12.9/74.2 ± 13.6 years; p < 0.001), more likely to be men (84%/65%), and more often had a history of heart failure hospitalization (70%/36%; p = 0.001), cardiomyopathy as the underlying heart disease (51%/27%; p < 0.001), and previous serious ventricular arrhythmia (57%/3.8%; p < 0.001), and had lower LVEF (25.4±7.4%/29.5±6.9%; p < 0.001), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (43.0±19.7/47.8±23.4 mL/min/1.73m2; p = 0.04) than those in the non-ICD group. The cumulative 1-year incidence of the primary arrhythmic composite endpoint of SCD, arrhythmic death, or resuscitated cardiac arrest trended to be lower in the ICD group than in the non-ICD group (0.0% versus 3.4%, p = 0.053), and the lower adjusted risk of the ICD group relative to the non-ICD group was significant for the primary arrhythmic endpoint (HR 0.10, 95% CI, 0.01-0.53; p = 0.003). However, there were no differences in the cumulative incidences of all-cause death between the ICD and non-ICD groups (17.3% versus 17.5%, p = 0.68), and the adjusted risk of the ICD group relative to the non-ICD group remained insignificant for all-cause death (HR, 0.85; 95%CI, 0.52-1.36, p = 0.51).

CONCLUSIONS

This study elucidated the real-world features of ADHF patients between those with ICD and those without. ICD use in patients with ADHF and reduced LVEF as compared with non-ICD use was associated with significant risk reduction for arrhythmic events, but not for mortality.

Sudden death in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and beyond: an elusive target

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represents half of HF patients, who are more likely older, women, and hypertensive. Mortality rates in HFpEF are higher compared with age- and comorbidity-matched non-HF controls and lower than in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); the majority (50-70%) are cardiovascular (CV) deaths. Among CV deaths, sudden death (SD) (~ 35%) and HF-death (~ 20%) are the leading cardiac modes of death; however, proportionally, CV deaths, SD, and HF-deaths are lower in HFpEF, while non-CV deaths constitute a higher proportion of deaths in HFpEF (30-40%) than in HFrEF (~ 15%). Importantly, the underlying mechanism of SD has not been clearly elucidated and non-arrhythmic SD may be more prominent in HFpEF than in HFrEF. Furthermore, there is no specific strategy for identifying high-risk patients, probably due to wide heterogeneity in presentation and pathophysiology of HFpEF and a plethora of comorbidities in this population. Thus, the management of HFpEF remains problematic due to paucity of data on the clinical benefits of current therapies, which focus on symptom relief and reduction of HF-hospitalization by controlling fluid retention and managing risk-factors and comorbidities. Matching a specific pathophysiology or mode of death with available and novel therapies may improve outcomes in HFpEF. However, this still remains an elusive target, as we need more information on determinants of SD. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have changed the landscape of SD prevention in HFrEF; if ICDs are to be applied to HFpEF, there must be a coordinated effort to identify and select high-risk patients.

Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator - Initial Experience in the Outpatient Setting in Japan

Background: The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) has been available since 2014 in Japan, and its benefit in the in-hospital acute phase at high risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA) has been established, but its clinical use in the outpatient setting remains unclear, especially in Japan.

Methods and Results: The subjects consisted of 43 consecutive patients with WCD use in the outpatient setting from April 2014 to October 2019 at the present institute. Event alerts and wearing compliance were checked via the remote monitoring system, and a dedicated WCD training team contacted the patients if necessary. The median observation period was 51 days (IQR, 37–68 days) and the median daily wearing time was 23.1 h/day (IQR, 22.0–23.6 h/day). WCD was prescribed for primary prevention of VTA in 7 patients (16%), and for secondary prevention in 36 (84%). The common reason for WCD use was preventive therapy and/or clinical observation. Two appropriate and one inappropriate shock were observed. Eleven patients were not indicated for ICD because of successful catheter ablation optimal medical therapy, VTA in early onset of heart disease and refusal. The remaining 32 patients, however, underwent ICD implantation.

Conclusions: In the present real-world study, the WCD wearing compliance was well-maintained in the outpatient setting. WCD is useful for patients at high risk of VTA.

Echocardiographic global longitudinal strain is associated with infarct size assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance in acute myocardial infarction

The aim of this study was to investigate if there was an association between infarct size (IS) measured by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and echocardiographic global longitudinal strain (GLS) in the early stage of acute myocardial infarction in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention were assessed with CMR and transthoracic echocardiogram within 1 week of hospital admission. Two-dimensional speckle tracking was performed using a semi-automatic algorithm (EchoPac, GE Healthcare). Longitudinal strain curves were generated in a 17-segment model covering the entire left ventricular myocardium. GLS was calculated automatically. LVEF was measured by auto-LVEF in EchoPac. IS was measured by late gadolinium enhancement CMR in short-axis views covering the left ventricle. The study population consisted of 49 patients (age 60.4 ± 9.7 years; 92% male). The study population had preserved echocardiographic LVEF with a mean of 45.8 ± 8.7%. For each percent increase of IS, we found an impairment in GLS by 1.59% (95% CI 0.57–2.61), P = 0.02, after adjustment for sex, age and LVEF. No significant association between IS and echocardiographic LVEF was found: −0.25 (95% CI: −0.61 to 0.11), P = 0.51. At the segmental level, the strongest association between IS and longitudinal strain was found in the apical part of the LV: impairment of 1.69% (95% CI: 1.14–2.23), P < 0.001, for each percent increase in IS. In conclusion, GLS was significantly associated with IS in the early stage of acute myocardial infarction in patients with preserved LVEF, and this association was strongest in the apical part of the LV. No association between IS and LVEF was found.

Clinical characteristics of hospitalized heart failure patients with preserved, mid-range, and reduced ejection fractions in Japan

Aims

There are regional differences in the patient characteristics, management, and outcomes of hospitalized patients with heart failure (HF). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of Japanese patients who are hospitalized with HF on the basis of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) stratum.

Methods and results

We retrospectively conducted a multicentre cohort study of 1245 hospitalized patients with decompensated HF between 2013 and 2014. Of these patients, 36% had an LVEF < 40% [HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), median age 72 years, 71% male], 21% had an LVEF 40–49% [HF with mid‐range EF (HFmrEF), 77 years, 56% male], and 43% had an LVEF ≥ 50% [HF with preserved EF (HFpEF), 81 years, 44% male]. The primary outcome was death from any cause, and the secondary outcomes were cardiac death and re‐hospitalization due to worsened HF after hospital discharge. There were high proportions of non‐ischaemic cardiomyopathy (32%) in HFrEF patients, coronary artery disease (44%) in HFmrEF patients, and valvular disease (39%) in HFpEF patients. The frequencies of intravenous diuretic and natriuretic peptide administration during hospitalization were 66% and 30%, respectively. The median hospital stay for the overall population was 19 days, and the length of stay was >7 days for >90% of patients. In‐hospital mortality was 7%, but was not different among the LVEF groups (HFrEF 7%, HFmrEF 6%, and HFpEF 8%). After a median follow‐up of 19 months (range, 3–26 months), 192 (17%) of the 1156 patients who were discharged alive died, and 534 (46%) were re‐hospitalized after hospital discharge. There were no significant differences in mortality after hospital discharge among the three LVEF groups (HFrEF 18%, HFmrEF 16%, and HFpEF 16%). There were no differences in cardiac death or re‐hospitalization due to worsened HF after hospital discharge among the LVEF groups (cardiac death: HFrEF 8%, HFmrEF 7%, and HFpEF 7%; re‐hospitalization due to worsened HF: HFrEF 19%, HFmrEF 16%, and HFpEF 17%). Multivariable‐adjusted analyses showed that the HFmrEF and HFrEF groups, compared with the HFpEF group, were not associated with an increased risk for in‐hospital death or death after hospital discharge. Non‐cardiac causes of death and re‐hospitalization after hospital discharge accounted for 35% and 38%, respectively.

Conclusions

Our results revealed different clinical characteristics but similar mortality rates in the HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF groups. The most common cause of death and re‐hospitalization after hospital discharge was HF, but non‐cardiac causes also contributed to their prognosis. Integrated management approaches will be required for HF patients.

Evaluation of Need for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator by Thallium-201 Scintigraphy Among Japanese Patients With Prior Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Identifying who among current Japanese patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) would benefit from an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is imperative. Accordingly, this study seeks to determine whether single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) can help identify such patients. Methods and Results: This retrospective study enrolled 60 consecutive patients with prior MI who underwent stress thallium-201 SPECT and ICD implantation from February 2000 to October 2014. Occurrence of arrhythmic death and/or or appropriate ICD therapy, defined as shock or antitachycardia pacing for ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia, was identified until November 2016. During the median follow-up interval of 6.6 years, 18 (30%) patients experienced arrhythmic death and/or appropriate ICD therapy. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed that the summed stress score (SSS) [hazard ratio (HR)=1.14; P=0.005] and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at rest (HR=0.92; P=0.038) were significantly associated with the occurrence of arrhythmic events. Patients with SSS ≥21 and LVEF ≤30%, which were determined to be the best cutoff points, had significantly higher incidence of the arrhythmic events than the other patients (64% vs. 11%; HR=7.18; log-rank P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

SSS using stress thallium-201 SPECT in combination with LVEF can help determine the need for ICD therapy among current Japanese patients with prior MI.

Implantable cardiac defibrillators for people with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

There is evidence that implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention in people with an ischaemic cardiomyopathy improves survival rate. The evidence supporting this intervention in people with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy is not as definitive, with the recently published DANISH trial finding no improvement in survival rate. A systematic review of all eligible studies was needed to evaluate the benefits and harms of using ICDs for primary prevention in people with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of using compared to not using ICD for primary prevention in people with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy receiving optimal medical therapy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Web of Science Core Collection on 10 October 2018. For ongoing or unpublished clinical trials, we searched the US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and the ISRCTN registry. To identify economic evaluation studies, we conducted a separate search to 31 March 2015 of the NHS Economic Evaluation Database, and from March 2015 to October 2018 on MEDLINE and Embase.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials involving adults with chronic non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy due to a left ventricular systolic dysfunction with an ejection fraction of 35% or less (New York Heart Association (NYHA) type I-IV). Participants in the intervention arm should have received ICD in addition to optimal medical therapy, while those in the control arm received optimal medical therapy alone. We included studies with cardiac resynchronisation therapy when it was appropriately balanced in the experimental and control groups.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, sudden cardiac death, and adverse events associated with the intervention. The secondary outcomes were non-cardiovascular death, health-related quality of life, hospitalisation for heart failure, first ICD-related hospitalisation, and cost. We abstracted the log (hazard ratio) and its variance from trial reports for time-to-event survival data. We extracted the raw data necessary to calculate the risk ratio. We summarised data on quality of life and cost-effectiveness narratively. We assessed the certainty of evidence for all outcomes using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified six eligible randomised trials with a total of 3128 participants. The use of ICD plus optimal medical therapy versus optimal medical therapy alone decreases the risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 0.92; participants = 3128; studies = 6; high-certainty evidence). An average of 24 patients need to be treated with ICD to prevent one additional death from any cause (number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) = 24). Individuals younger than 65 derive more benefit than individuals older than 65 (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.91; participants = 348; studies = 1) (NNTB = 10). When added to medical therapy, ICDs probably decrease cardiovascular mortality compared to not adding them (risk ratio (RR) 0.75, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.21; participants = 1781; studies = 4; moderate-certainty evidence) (possibility of both plausible benefit and no effect). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was also found to decrease sudden cardiac deaths (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.70; participants = 1677; studies = 3; high-certainty evidence). An average of 25 patients need to be treated with an ICD to prevent one additional sudden cardiac death (NNTB = 25). We found that ICDs probably increase adverse events (possibility of both plausible harm and benefit), but likely have little or no effect on non-cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.68; participants = 1781; studies = 4; moderate-certainty evidence) (possibility of both plausible benefit and no effect). Finally, using ICD therapy probably has little or no effect on quality of life, however shocks from the device cause a deterioration in quality of life. No study reported the outcome of first ICD-related hospitalisations.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The use of ICD in addition to medical therapy in people with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy decreases all-cause mortality and sudden cardiac deaths and probably decreases mortality from cardiovascular causes compared to medical therapy alone. Their use probably increases the risk for adverse events. However, these devices come at a high cost, and shocks from ICDs cause a deterioration in quality of life.

Thyroid-stimulating hormone within the normal range and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction

BACKGROUND

The association between thyroid-stimulating-hormone (TSH) and prognosis of nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) in patients with normal thyroid function remains unclear.

HYPOTHESIS

Our aim was to investigate the association between TSH and major adverse cardiovascular events in euthyroid NIDCM patients.

METHODS

The original cohort consisted of 216 consecutive euthyroid NIDCM patients, with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, who were observed from 2010 to 2013. Patients with persistent ventricular arrhythmia (VA) histories, amiodarone taken for VA prevention, or on heart transplant list within 1 year were excluded. A follow-up evaluation was performed, and VA events, heart failure (HF) exacerbation/heart transplant, cardiac death, or death from any cause were separately evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 184 patients were enrolled, and 97.8% (180/184) ultimately received follow-up evaluations. During the median 4.6-year follow-up, 24 VA events, 28 cardiac deaths, 30 all-cause deaths, 40 HF exacerbations, and 11 heart transplant events occurred. Serum TSH levels showed good predictive efficacies for VA events (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.702, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.629-0.767), and the risk of VA events increased, according to serum TSH quarters, as determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis (2.2% vs 13.4% vs 21.0% vs 30.0%, Q1-Q4, P = 0.011). Multivariable Cox analysis showed that patients at the Q4 level of serum TSH (>2.67 mIU/L) suffered an increased risk of VA events, compared with those at the Q1 level of TSH (hazard ratio [HR] = 15.88, 95% CI: 2.01-65.15) or those at the other three quarters (HR = 3.17, 95% CI: 1.38-7.26). However, the Q4 TSH level was not associated with other adverse cardiac events.

CONCLUSION

An association between TSH levels and the risk of VA events may exist in euthyroid NIDCM patients.

Body Mass Index and Sudden Cardiac Death in Japanese Patients After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Data From the JCAD Study and HIJAMI-II Registry

Background

Although an “obesity paradox” exists in patients after myocardial infarction, the association between obesity and the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) is limited. The aim of this study was to determine whether obesity is associated with an increased risk of SCD in Japanese survivors of acute myocardial infarction.

Methods and Results

Pooled data from 2 cohort studies in Japan, JCAD (Japanese Coronary Artery Disease) study and the Heart Institute of Japan Acute Myocardial Infarction‐II (HIJAMI‐II) registry, comprising of 6216 patients (mean age 65±11 years, 75.2% male) with acute myocardial infarction who were discharged alive, were studied. The patients were categorized into the following body mass index (BMI) groups at baseline according to the World Health Organization classification for Asian populations: BMI <18.5 kg/m² (n=335), 18.5 to 23 kg/m² (n=2371), 23 to 27.5 kg/m² (n=2823), and ≥27.5 kg/m² (n=687). The main outcomes were all‐cause mortality and SCD. During an average follow‐up period of 3.6±1.4 years, all‐cause mortality was 10.1%, and SCD was 1.2%. Patients with BMI <18.5 kg/m² had the highest rate of all‐cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.20–2.16), but high BMI (≥27.5 kg/m²) was not associated with mortality compared with patients in the group with BMI ≥18.5 and <23 kg/m². However, the long‐term risk of SCD was increased in the group with BMI ≥27.5 kg/m² (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.24–7.15). Multivariate analysis revealed that BMI ≥27.5 kg/m² was associated with an increased risk of SCD (hazard ratio, 2.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.35–5.74).

Conclusions

Obesity (BMI ≥27.5 kg/m²) was associated with the risk of SCD in Japanese patients after myocardial infarction, although an obesity paradox was found for all‐cause mortality.

Cardiorenal syndrome as predictor of in-hospital mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

INTRODUCTION

Cardiorenal syndrome includes numerous conditions affecting the heart and kidney, and is a strong predictor of cardiovascular mortality.

METHOD

An analysis was performed on 157 consecutive patients admitted to the Coronary Care Unit of the Camilo Cienfuegos Hospital due to an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and heart failure, from January 2013 to December 2016. An analysis was made of the presence of cardiorenal syndrome and its relationship with epidemiological, clinical, and analytical variables, as well as complementary explorations. The relationship between cardiorenal syndrome and in-hospital mortality was assessed using binary logistical regression.

RESULTS

A total of 52 (33.1%) patients had a cardiorenal syndrome. The haemoglobin level was lower in the group of patients with cardiorenal syndrome (117.2 ± 15.3 vs. 123.3 ± 15.1, P = .019), and in left ventricular ejection fraction (34.8 ± 8 vs. 43.2 ± 10.8). A positive correlation was found between the Killip class and the increase in serum creatinine after 48 h. The serum creatinine was associated with left ventricular ejection fraction (r = 0.166; P = .038). The multivariate analysis showed that cardiorenal syndrome was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality when adjusted for a history of ischaemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus status, atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrhythmias, left ventricular ejection fraction, age and systolic blood pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of cardiorenal syndrome has an influence on the prognosis of patients who suffer a cardiorenal syndrome. Its detection could be useful in the risk stratification.

Cardiac troponin T as a predictor of cardiac death in patients with left ventricular dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Cardiac troponin T (cTnT) has been reported to be associated with cardiac mortality. In the present study, we evaluated the role of routine assessment of cTnT as a predictor of future cardiac death in patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction.

METHODS

Patients who were eligible for prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) were included from cardiac catheterization database. Inclusion criteria were patients with LV ejection fraction of ≤ 35% and with New York Heart Association (NYHA) ≥class II. Exclusion criteria were patients with acute coronary syndrome, ICD for secondary prevention, NYHA class IV, and lack of data. The final study patients were divided into the following three groups in accordance with two quartile points of serum cTnT levels: low cTnT, intermediate cTnT, and high cTnT groups. The primary endpoint of this study was cardiac death.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients were included (mean age, 62±13 years; male individuals, 56; ischemic, 36; and non-ischemic, 34). During the observation period of 2.2 years, cardiac death was observed in 17 patients (fatal arrhythmic event, 9; heart failure, 7; myocardial infarction, 1). In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the high cTnT group showed the highest risk among all the groups (p<0.001). Even in sub-analyses for ischemic and non-ischemic patients, the results were the same, and the high cTnT group showed the highest event rate (p<0.05). In contrast, no cardiac death was observed in the low cTnT group.

CONCLUSION

The cTnT levels in a stable state were associated with cardiac death in patients with LV dysfunction, even in those with non-ischemic diseases.

Effect of left ventricular systolic dysfunction on secondary medical prevention and clinical outcome in stable coronary artery disease patients

BACKGROUND

Limited recent data are available in the literature on whether the presence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) affects the therapeutic management of patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).

AIMS

The objectives of this study were to analyse prevalence, effect on therapeutics and prognosis of LVSD in stable CAD.

METHODS

We prospectively included 4184 CAD outpatients free from any myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization for>1year. Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was available for 4124 (98.6%) patients. Follow-up was performed at 2years. All events were adjudicated blindly.

RESULTS

The mean EF was 57.5±10.8%, and 201 (4.9%) patients had an EF≤35%. The prescription of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and beta-blockers was inversely related to EF, and reached>90% in patients with EF≤35%. Seventy-five (37.3%) of the patients with EF≤35% received a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. Eighty-five (42.3%) of the patients with EF≤35% had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Clinical follow-up data were obtained for 4090 patients (99.2%). Event rates were higher in patients with low EF (adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] for EF≤35%, with EF≥60% as reference: 3.93 [2.60-5.93] and 7.12 [3.85-13.18], for all-cause death and cardiovascular death, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with stable CAD, LVSD is well taken into account by cardiologists, with extensive use of evidence-based medications and interventions. Despite this, LVSD remains a major prognostic indicator in this population.

Mortality and predictors of appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in Japanese patients with Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II criteria

BACKGROUND

Data regarding long-term mortality and factors influencing appropriate therapies in Japanese patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), who satisfy the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II (MADIT II) criteria for primary prevention, remain scarce.

METHODS

A total of 118 consecutive patients who underwent ICD implantation without any prior ventricular arrhythmic event, from January 2000 to December 2012, were enrolled based on the MADIT II criteria: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤30% with ischemic heart disease and at least 4 weeks after a myocardial infarction. We investigated the mortality and factors influencing appropriate ICD therapies in this population.

RESULTS

The mean age was 69±10 years, and the mean LVEF was 25.1±4.5%. During the median follow up of 1406 days, the mortality rate was 20%, and the incidence of appropriate ICD therapy was 37% at 3 years. Multivariate analysis by using Cox regression model showed that left ventricular diastolic diameter ≥60 mm (hazard ratio [HR], 2.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-5.38; P=0.033) and the presence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) before implantation (HR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.17-4.39; P=0.015) were independent predictors of appropriate ICD therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The mortality and incidence of appropriate ICD therapy were 20% and 37%, respectively, at 3 years in Japanese patients who met the MADIT II criteria during ICD implantation for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. The presence of NSVT and dilated left ventricle independently predicted the incidence of appropriate ICD therapy after implantation.

Mortality pattern and cause of death in a long-term follow-up of patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the pattern of mortality and cause of death in a cohort of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI during 2006-2013 were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 3.5 years (1-8.4 years). We used hospital and general practice records and mortality data from The Australian National Death Index.

RESULTS

Among 1313 patients (22.5% female) with mean age of 62.3±13.1 years, 181 patients (13.7%) died during long-term follow-up. In the first 7 days, 45 patients (3.4%) died, 76% of these due to cardiogenic shock. Between 7 days and 1 year, another 50 patients died (3.9%), 58% from cardiovascular causes and 22% from cancer. Beyond 1 year, there were 86 deaths with an estimated mean mortality rate of 2.05% per year, 36% of deaths were cardiovascular and 52% non-cardiovascular, including 29% cancer-related deaths. On multivariate analysis, age ≥75 years, history of diabetes, prior PCI, cardiogenic shock, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 and symptom-to-balloon time >360 min were independent predictors of long-term mortality. In 16 patients who died of sudden cardiac death postdischarge, only 4 (25%) had ejection fraction ≤35% and would have been eligible for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

CONCLUSIONS

In the era of routine primary PCI, we found a mortality rate of 7.3% at 1 year, and 2.05% per year thereafter. Cause of death was predominantly cardiovascular in the first year and mainly non-cardiovascular after 1 year. Age, diabetes, prior PCI, cardiogenic shock, eGFR <60 and delayed treatment were independent predictors of mortality.

Long-term Effect of Optimized Sedation and Pain Management after Sudden Cardiac Arrest

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Appropriate use of sedatives and analgesics is essential to keep critically ill patients comfortable and to prevent prolonged mechanical ventilation time and length of stay in ICU. Aim of this study was to analyse the long-term effect of an algorithm-based individual analgesic-sedative protocol on mechanical ventilation time and ICU length of stay in critically ill patients after sudden cardiac arrest due to ST-elevated myocardial infarction.

SUBJECT AND METHODS

We examined a total of 109 patients before and after implementation of an algorithm-based sedation management. Our sedation protocol included individual defined sedation goals achieved by standardized sedation strategies. Mechanical ventilation time and ICU length of stay were analysed for three groups of patients: before and after the intervention and in the long-term follow-up.

RESULTS

We observed shorter median mechanical ventilation time and ICU length of stay in the interventional and longterm follow-up group compared to the standard-care group without statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate a long-term reduction of mechanical ventilation time and ICU length of stay achieved by implementation of an individual sedation management. This suggests sedation guidelines as effective tools to reduce the mechanical ventilation time and ICU length of stay in patients after sudden cardiac arrest in ST-elevated myocardial infarction. Investigations with a larger patient number and higher statistical power are required to confirm these findings.

Japan Implantable Devices in Coronary Artery Disease (JID-CAD) study design

BACKGROUND

There is little information regarding appropriate therapies for coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with implantable devices - such as implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), cardiac resynchronization therapy devices (CRT-Ds) and cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (CRT-P) devices - in Japan. To address this lack of information, we have launched the Japan Implantable Devices in Coronary Artery Disease (JID-CAD) study.

METHODS

This study has been designed as a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized and observational investigation. All patients will be followed up every six months over a two-year period. The primary endpoint will be the administration of appropriate device therapy. Secondary endpoints include administration of inappropriate therapy, death, hospitalization, or cardiovascular events.

CONCLUSION

In this report, we discuss the current clinical situation of appropriate therapy, and how it is influenced by catheter ablation and revascularization therapy in patients with CAD.

Current status of primary prevention of sudden cardiac death with implantable cardioverter defibrillator in patients with chronic heart failure--a report from the CHART-2 Study

BACKGROUND

The current status of primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction remains to be fully elucidated in Japan.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In the chronic heart failure (CHF) cohort study, the CHART-2 Study, we enrolled 2,778 consecutive patients with NYHA class II-III. According to the Japanese Circulation Society guideline of prophylactic ICD, we divided them into 3 groups: group A, class I indication; B, class IIa; and C, no indication. During the (median) 3.2-year follow-up, 79 fatal arrhythmic events (FAE), defined as composite of sudden cardiac/arrhythmic death, ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation and appropriate ICD therapy, occurred. In the groups A, B and C, the prevalence of FAE was 16.1%, 8.9% and 1.9%, respectively; the use of prophylactic ICD among those with FAE, however, was only 44%, 9% and 6%, respectively. In the groups A and B combined, chronic atrial fibrillation (cAF) and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVDd) ≥ 65 mm were independent predictors of FAE, and, when combined, their prognostic impact was highly significant (hazard ratio, 7.01; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary prevention of SCD with ICD in CHF patients is validated but is still underused in Japan, and the combination of cAF and LVDd ≥ 65 mm may be a useful indication of prophylactic ICD implantation.

The clinical challenge of preventing sudden cardiac death immediately after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Unfortunately, of all patients experiencing acute myocardial infarction (MI), usually in the form of ST-elevation MI, 25-35% will die of sudden cardiac death (SCD) before receiving medical attention, most often from ventricular fibrillation. For patients who reach the hospital, prognosis is considerably better and has improved over the years. Reperfusion therapy, best attained with primary percutaneous coronary intervention compared to thrombolysis, has made a big difference in reducing the risk of SCD early and late after ST-elevation MI. In-hospital SCD due to ventricular tachyarrhythmias is manageable, with either preventive measures or drugs or electrical cardioversion. There is general agreement for secondary prevention of SCD post-MI with implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) when malignant ventricular arrhythmias occur late (>48 h) after an MI, and are not due to reversible or correctable causes. The major challenge remains that of primary prevention, that is, how to prevent SCD during the first 1-3 months after ST-elevation MI for patients who have low left ventricular ejection fraction and are not candidates for an ICD according to current guidelines, due to the results of two studies, which did not show any benefits of early (<40 days after an MI) ICD implantation. Two recent documents may provide direction as to how to bridge the gap for this early post-MI period. Both recommend an electrophysiology study to guide implantation of an ICD, at least for those developing syncope or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, who have an inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia at the electrophysiology study. An ICD is also recommended for patients with indication for a permanent pacemaker due to bradyarrhythmias, who also meet primary prevention criteria for SCD.

Prognosis of myocardial infarction with left ventricular dysfunction in the coronary revascularization era.Subanalysis of the Japanese Coronary Artery Disease (JCAD) Study

BACKGROUND

Indications of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for patients with an old myocardial infarction (OMI) and left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) were expanded in Western countries after the results of MADIT II. However, the prognosis of OMI patients with LVD and the merits of prophylactic implantation of ICD, based on evidence in Japan, have not yet been clarified. This subanalysis of the Japanese Coronary Artery Disease (JCAD) Study focused on MADIT II-compatible patients to clarify the prognosis of OMI patients with LVD in Japan.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive 6,868 OMI patients were prospectively followed up for 3 years or until clinical events occurred. 291 patients had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤30%. Clinical events, congestive heart failure, cardiopulmonary arrest on arrival and vascular events were significantly more frequent in patients with LVEF ≤30% than in those with better LVEF. In the LVEF ≤30% group, cardiopulmonary arrest on arrival comprised 33% of all-cause deaths, and the survival curves at 2 years of the LVEF ≤30% group were almost compatible with those of the MADIT II ICD group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this subanalysis, LVD was less frequent than in Western countries. The annual death rate in JCAD was better than for the MADIT II ICD group. The prophylactic use of ICD seemed to be less effective than in Western countries but still expected to be useful for OMI patients with LVD in Japan.

Effect of left ventricular dysfunction and viral load on risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with human immunodeficiency virus

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients are disproportionately affected by cardiovascular disease and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Whether left ventricular (LV) dysfunction predicts SCD in those with HIV is unknown. We sought to determine the impact of LV dysfunction on SCD in patients with HIV. We previously characterized all SCDs and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) deaths in 2,860 consecutive patients in a public HIV clinic from 2000 to 2009. Transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs) performed during the study period were identified. The effect of ejection fraction (EF), diastolic dysfunction, pulmonary artery pressure, and LV mass on SCD and AIDS death were evaluated: 423 patients had at least 1 TTE; 13 SCDs and 55 AIDS deaths had at least 1 TTE. In the propensity-adjusted analysis, EF 30% to 39% and EF<30% predicted SCD (hazard ratio [HR] 9.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7 to 53.3, p=0.01 and HR 38.5, 95% CI 7.6 to 195.0, p<0.001, respectively) but not AIDS death. Diastolic dysfunction also predicted SCD (HR 14.8, 95% CI 4.0 to 55.4, p<0.001) but not AIDS death, even after adjusting for EF. The association between EF<40% and SCD was greater in subjects with detectable versus undetectable HIV RNA (adjusted HR 11.7, 95% CI 2.9 to 47.2, p=0.001 vs HR 2.7, 95% CI 0.3 to 27.6, p=0.41; p=0.07 for interaction). In conclusion, LV systolic dysfunction and diastolic dysfunction predict SCD but not AIDS death in a large HIV cohort, with greater effect in those with detectable HIV RNA. Further investigation is needed to thoroughly evaluate the effect of low EF and HIV factors on SCD incidence and the potential benefit of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in this high-risk population.

Outcome of prolonged ventricular fibrillation and CPR in a rat model of chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction

Patients with chronic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction are assumed to have a lower chance of successful CPR and lower likelihood of ultimate survival. However, these assumptions have rarely been documented. Therefore, we investigated the outcome of prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF) and CPR in a rat model of chronic LV dysfunction. Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized to (1) chronic LV dysfunction: animals underwent left coronary artery ligation; and (2) sham control. Echocardiography was used to measure cardiac performance before surgery and 4 weeks after surgery. Four weeks after surgical intervention, 8 min of VF was induced and defibrillation was delivered after 8 min of CPR. LV dilation and low ejection fraction were observed 4 weeks after coronary ligation. With optimal chest compressions, coronary perfusion pressure values during CPR were well maintained and indistinguishable between groups. There were no differences in resuscitability and numbers of shock required for successful resuscitation between groups. Despite the significantly decreased cardiac index in LV dysfunction animals before induction of VF, no differences in cardiac index were observed between groups following resuscitation, which was associated with the insignificant difference in postresuscitation survival. In conclusion, the outcomes of CPR were not compromised by the preexisting chronic LV dysfunction.

Early echocardiographic deformation analysis for the prediction of sudden cardiac death and life-threatening arrhythmias after myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to hypothesize that global longitudinal strain (GLS) as a measure of infarct size, and mechanical dispersion (MD) as a measure of myocardial deformation heterogeneity, would be of incremental importance for the prediction of sudden cardiac death (SCD) or malignant ventricular arrhythmias (VA) after acute myocardial infarction (MI).

BACKGROUND

SCD after acute MI is a rare but potentially preventable late complication predominantly caused by malignant VA. Novel echocardiographic parameters such as GLS and MD have previously been shown to identify patients with chronic ischemic heart failure at increased risk for arrhythmic events. Risk prediction during admission for acute MI is important because a majority of SCD events occur in the early period after hospital discharge.

METHODS

We prospectively included patients with acute MI and performed echocardiography, with measurements of GLS and MD defined as the standard deviation of time to peak negative strain in all myocardial segments. The primary composite endpoint (SCD, admission with VA, or appropriate therapy from a primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator [ICD]) was analyzed with Cox models.

RESULTS

A total of 988 patients (mean age: 62.6 ± 12.1 years; 72% male) were included, of whom 34 (3.4%) experienced the primary composite outcome (median follow-up: 29.7 months). GLS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25 to 1.53; p < 0.0001) and MD (HR/10 ms: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.24 to 1.55; p < 0.0001) were significantly related to the primary endpoint.

GLS (HR

1.24; 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.40; p = 0.0004) and MD (HR/10 ms: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.31; p = 0.0320) remained independently prognostic after multivariate adjustment. Integrated diagnostic improvement (IDI) and net reclassification index (NRI) were significant for the addition of GLS (IDI: 4.4% [p < 0.05]; NRI: 29.6% [p < 0.05]), whereas MD did not improve risk reclassification when GLS was known.

CONCLUSIONS

Both GLS and MD were significantly and independently related to SCD/VA in these patients with acute MI and, in particular, GLS improved risk stratification above and beyond existing risk factors.