A Randomized Comparison of Radial Artery Intimal Hyperplasia Following Distal Versus Proximal Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography: PRESERVE RADIAL

BACKGROUND

Distal transradial access (dTRA) is an alternative to conventional forearm transradial access (fTRA) for coronary angiography (CAG). Differences in healing of the radial artery (RA) in the forearm have not been evaluated between these 2 access strategies. We sought to compare the mean difference in forearm RA intimal-medial thickening (IMT) in patients randomized to dTRA versus fTRA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this single-center randomized clinical trial, 64 patients undergoing nonemergent CAG were randomized (1:1) to dTRA versus fTRA. Ultra-high-resolution (55-MHz) vascular ultrasound of the forearm and distal RA was performed pre-CAG and at 90 days. The primary end point was the mean change in forearm RA IMT. Secondary end points included procedural characteristics, vascular injury, RA occlusion, and ipsilateral hand pain and function. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics, mean forearm RA IMT, and procedural specifics were similar between the dTRA and fTRA cohorts. There was no difference in mean change in forearm RA IMT between the 2 cohorts (0.07 versus 0.07 mm; P=0.37). No RA occlusions or signs of major vascular injury were observed at 90 days. Ipsilateral hand pain and function (Borg pain scale score: 12 versus 11; P=0.24; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulders, and Hand scale score: 6 versus 8; P=0.46) were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Following CAG, dTRA was associated with no differences in mean change of forearm RA IMT, hand pain, and function versus fTRA for CAG. Further investigation is warranted to elucidate mechanisms and predictors of RA healing and identify effective strategies to preserving RA integrity for repeated procedures.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04801901.

PRecision Event Monitoring for PatienTs with Heart Failure using HeartLogic (PREEMPT-HF) study design and enrolment

AIMS

The HeartLogic multisensor index has been found to be a sensitive predictor of worsening heart failure (HF). However, there is limited data on this index's association and its constituent sensors with HF readmissions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The PREEMPT-HF study is a global, multicentre, prospective, observational, single-arm, post-market study. HF patients with an implantable defibrillator device or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator with HeartLogic capabilities were eligible if sensor data collection was turned on and the HeartLogic feature was not enabled. Thus, the HeartLogic Index/alert and heart sounds sensor trends were unavailable via the LATITUDE remote monitoring system to clinicians (blinded). Evaluation of subject medical records at 6 months and a final in-clinic visit at 12 months was required for collection of all-cause hospitalizations and HF outpatient visits. The purpose of this study is exploratory, no formal hypothesis tests are planned, and no adjustment for multiple testing will be performed. A total of 2183 patients were enrolled at 103 sites between June 2018 and June 2020. A significant proportion of the patients were implanted with implantable defibrillator devices (39%) versus cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (61%); were female (27%); over 65 (61%); New York Heart Association class I (13%), II (53%), and III (33%); ejection fraction < 25% (21%); ischaemic (50%); and with a history of renal dysfunction (23%).

CONCLUSIONS

The PREEMPT study will provide clinical data and blinded sensor trends for the characterization of sensor changes with HF readmission, tachyarrhythmias, and event subgroups. These data may help to refine the clinical use of HeartLogic and to improve patient outcomes.

The Early neo2 Registry: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With ACURATE neo2 in a European Population

Background ACURATE neo2 is a transcatheter aortic valve implantation system consisting of a self-expanding bioprosthetic valve with supra-annular leaflet position and featuring innovations to facilitate placement accuracy and reduce paravalvular regurgitation. Methods and Results The goal of the Early neo2 (Early neo2 Registry of the ACURATE neo2 TAVI Prosthesis) was to gather real-life data on safety and efficacy in a European transcatheter aortic valve implantation population treated with ACURATE neo2. Data were collected from 554 consecutive patients treated with ACURATE neo2 at 12 European sites (mean age, 82 years; 66% women; mean European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II, 4.5%±3.8%) between September 2020 and March 2021. The composite primary end point was the occurrence of any of the following: postoperative (in-hospital) paravalvular regurgitation grade ≥2, in-hospital acute kidney injury stage 3, postoperative pacemaker implantation, 30-day death, and 30-day stroke. The primary end point occurred in 12.6% of patients. The 30-day rates for all-cause death and all stroke were 1.3% and 2.7%, respectively, and 1.5% of patients exhibited stage 3 acute kidney injury. A total of 34 patients (6.2%) received a postoperative permanent pacemaker. Per core laboratory-adjudicated echocardiographic analysis, mean postoperative aortic valve gradient was 7.6±3.3 mm Hg, and 2.8% of patients exhibited paravalvular regurgitation grade ≥2. Conclusions In this report of postmarket use of the ACURATE neo2 valve in a real-world transcatheter aortic valve implantation population, patients exhibited favorable postoperative hemodynamics and clinical outcomes and a low rate of postoperative pacemaker implantation.

Comparison of Monopolar Review to Fixed Parameter Fractionation in Deep Brain Stimulation

Background

Technological advancements in deep brain stimulation (DBS) require methodological changes in programming. Fractionalization poses significant practical challenges for the most common approach for assessing DBS efficacy, monopolar review (MR).

Objectives

Two DBS programming methods: MR and fixed parameter vertical and horizontal fractionalization (FPF) were compared.

Methods

A two-phase process of vertical and horizontal FPF was performed. MR was conducted thereafter. After a short wash-out period, both optimal configurations determined by MR and FPF were tested in a double-blind randomized manner.

Results

Seven PD patients were enrolled, providing 11 hemispheres to compare the two conditions. In all subjects, the blinded examiner selected a directional or fractionalization configuration. There was no significant difference in clinical benefits between MR and FPF. FPF was the preferred method for initial programming as selected by subject and clinician.

Conclusions

FPF programming is a viable and efficient methodology that may be incorporated into clinical practice.

Applying the ESC 2016, H2 FPEF, and HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithms for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction to the general population

AIMS

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is common in patients presenting with dyspnoea. Recently, clinical tools were developed to facilitate the diagnosis of HFpEF. Here, we apply the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2016 heart failure guidelines and the H2 FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores to a middle-aged sample of the general population and compared the different groups with each other.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study included the first 10 000 participants of the population-based Hamburg City Health Study. A total of 5613 subjects, aged 62 ± 8.7 years (51.1% women), qualified for the analysis. Unexplained dyspnoea was present in 407 (7.3%) subjects. In those, the estimated prevalence of HFpEF was 20.4% (ESC 2016), 12.3% (H2 FPEF), and 7.6% (HFA-PEFF). The majority of subjects was classified as HFpEF not excludable according to the HFA-PEFF (57.7%) and H2 FPEF (59.2%) scores. For all algorithms, subjects diagnosed with HFpEF showed elevated age and body mass index as well as a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation, diabetes, and arterial hypertension compared with those without HFpEF or HFpEF not excludable. The distribution of those co-morbidities and risk factors varied between the differently diagnosed HFpEF groups with the highest burden in the HFpEF group defined by the H2 FPEF score. The overlap of subjects diagnosed with HFpEF according to the different algorithms was very limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Unexplained dyspnoea is common in the middle-aged general population. The ESC 2016 algorithm and the H2 FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores detect different, discordant subpopulations of probands with breathlessness. Further classification of the HFpEF syndrome is desirable.

Rationale and design of the HINODE study: Heart failure indication and sudden cardiac death prevention trial Japan

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials in Western countries have provided evidence that prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy reduces mortality in heart failure (HF) patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. However, the risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in Japanese HF patients sharing similar risk factors is still unknown.

METHODS

The Heart Failure Indication and Sudden Cardiac Death Prevention Trial Japan trial (NCT03185832) is a prospective, multicenter registry designed to collect data on ventricular arrhythmia, HF events, and mortality in Japanese HF patients. Japanese patients with HF and 2-5 predefined risk factors who were indicated for cardiac device implantation based on European Society of Cardiology guidelines were enrolled in four treatment arms: implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D), HF pacing (PA; Pacemaker and cardiac resynchronization pacemaker), and nondevice (ND) cohorts and followed for a minimum of 12 months. Since it is anticipated that some baseline patient characteristics and risk factors will differ significantly from those reported in predominantly Western populations, event rates will be compared to a propensity-matched population from the MADIT RIT trial. Primary endpoints are composite rates of first appropriately treated ventricular arrhythmias (VA) or/and life-threatening VA symptoms for the ICD and CRT-D cohorts. For nondevice and PA cohorts, the primary outcome is all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The Heart Failure Indication and Sudden Cardiac Death Prevention Trial Japan is a large prospective multicenter registry with defined device treatment cohorts and will provide data for risk stratification for cardiovascular events in Japanese HF patients.