Upper arm intermittent ischaemia reduces exercise-related increase of platelet reactivity in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease

Platelet-Mediated Transfer of Cardioprotection by Remote Ischemic Conditioning and Its Abrogation by Aspirin But Not by Ticagrelor

PURPOSE

The role of platelets during myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) is ambivalent. They contribute to injury but also to cardioprotection. Repeated blood flow restriction and reperfusion in a tissue/organ remote from the heart (remote ischemic conditioning, RIC) reduce myocardial I/R injury and attenuate platelet activation. Whether or not platelets mediate RIC's cardioprotective signal is currently unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Venous blood from healthy volunteers (without or with pretreatment of 500/1000 mg aspirin or 180 mg ticagrelor orally, 2-3 h before the study, n = 18 each) was collected before and after RIC (3 × 5 min blood pressure cuff inflation at 200 mmHg on the left upper arm/5 min deflation). Washed platelets were isolated. Platelet-poor plasma was used to prepare plasma-dialysates. Platelets (25 × 103/µL) or plasma-dialysates (1:10) prepared before and after RIC from untreated versus aspirin- or ticagrelor-pretreated volunteers, respectively, were infused into isolated buffer-perfused rat hearts. Hearts were subjected to global 30 min/120 min I/R. Infarct size was stained. Infarct size was less with infusion of platelets/plasma-dialysate after RIC (18 ± 7%/23 ± 9% of ventricular mass) than with platelets/plasma-dialysate before RIC (34 ± 7%/33 ± 8%). Aspirin pretreatment abrogated the transfer of RIC's cardioprotection by platelets (after/before RIC, 34 ± 7%/33 ± 7%) but only attenuated that by plasma-dialysate (after/before RIC, 26 ± 8%/32 ± 5%). Ticagrelor pretreatment induced an in vivo formation of cardioprotective factor(s) per se (platelets/plasma-dialysate before RIC, 26 ± 7%/26 ± 7%) but did not impact on RIC's cardioprotection by platelets/plasma-dialysate (20 ± 7%/21 ± 5%).

CONCLUSION

Platelets serve as carriers for RIC's cardioprotective signal through an aspirin-sensitive and thus cyclooxygenase-dependent mechanism. The P2Y12 inhibitor ticagrelor per se induces a humoral cardioprotective signal.

Platelets and Cardioprotection: The Role of Nitric Oxide and Carbon Oxide

Nitric oxide (NO) and carbon monoxide (CO) represent a pair of biologically active gases with an increasingly well-defined range of effects on circulating platelets. These gases interact with platelets and cells in the vessels and heart and exert fundamentally similar biological effects, albeit through different mechanisms and with some peculiarity. Within the cardiovascular system, for example, the gases are predominantly vasodilators and exert antiaggregatory effects, and are protective against damage in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Indeed, NO is an important vasodilator acting on vascular smooth muscle and is able to inhibit platelet activation. NO reacts with superoxide anion (O₂(^-•)) to form peroxynitrite (ONOO(^-)), a nitrosating agent capable of inducing oxidative/nitrative signaling and stress both at cardiovascular, platelet, and plasma levels. CO reduces platelet reactivity, therefore it is an anticoagulant, but it also has some cardioprotective and procoagulant properties. This review article summarizes current knowledge on the platelets and roles of gas mediators (NO, and CO) in cardioprotection. In particular, we aim to examine the link and interactions between platelets, NO, and CO and cardioprotective pathways.

Fibrinolysis and Remote Ischemic Conditioning: Mechanisms and Treatment Perspectives in Stroke

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability. Intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy have greatly improved outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, only a minority of patients receive reperfusion therapies, highlighting the need for novel neuroprotective therapies. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC), consisting of brief, intermittent extremity occlusion and reperfusion induced with an inflatable cuff, is a potential neuroprotective therapy in acute stroke. The objective of this narrative review is to describe the effect of RIC on endogenous fibrinolysis and, from this perspective, investigate the potential of RIC in the prevention and treatment of stroke. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, and human studies in English were included. Seven studies had investigated the effect of RIC on fibrinolysis in humans. Long-term daily administration of RIC increased endogenous fibrinolysis, whereas a single RIC treatment did not acutely influence endogenous fibrinolysis. Fifteen studies had investigated the effect of RIC as a neuroprotective therapy in the prevention and treatment of stroke. Long-term RIC administration proved effective in reducing new cerebral vascular lesions in patients with established cerebrovascular disease. In patients with acute stroke, RIC was safe and feasible, though its clinical efficacy as a neuroprotectant is yet unproven. In conclusion, a single RIC treatment does not affect fibrinolysis in the acute phase, whereas long-term RIC administration may increase endogenous fibrinolysis. Increased endogenous fibrinolysis is unlikely to be the mediator of the acute neuroprotective effect of RIC in stroke patients, whereas it may partly explain the reduced stroke recurrence associated with long-term RIC treatment.

Remote ischemic preconditioning in a setting of electrical cardioversion of early onset persistent atrial fibrillation (RIP CAF trial): Rationale and study design

BACKGROUND

The beneficial effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIP) on electrophysiological parameters resulting in lower inducibility and sustainability of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with paroxysmal AF has been recently demonstrated in a randomized trial. However, the potential clinical impact of RIP on persistent AF (CAF) has not been investigated. Therefore, we designed a randomized trial set in a setting of electrical cardioversion (CV) of early onset CAF.

AIM

The aim of the study is to answer the following questions: I) Does RIP have impact on rate of spontaneous conversion into sinus rhythm (SR) within 24 h after first RIP intervention? II) Does RIP have the potential to improve the acute outcome of CV following a standardized protocol?

METHODS

The presented study is a two-armed randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, multi-center trial in a cohort of 588 patients with early onset CAF referred for electrical CV. The patients will undergo 3 sessions (immediately after randomization, the following morning, and directly before scheduled CV 24 h after randomization) of either RIP intervention or a sham procedure. The primary outcome of the study, i.e. documentation of SR 24 h after randomization as well secondary outcome i.e. stable SR first CV without usage of anti-arrhythmic drugs will be documented by 12-lead surface electrocardiography.

CONCLUSION

Previously observed positive effect of RIP on atrial electrophysiology might be also implemented in a clinical setting of CV and therefore simplified and improve patient treatment.

Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on platelet activation and reactivity in patients undergoing cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized controlled trial

During cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), platelet activation and dysfunction are associated with adverse outcomes. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been shown to attenuate platelet activation. We evaluated the effects of RIPC on platelet activation during CPB in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Among 58 randomized patients, 26 in the RIPC group and 28 in the sham-RIPC group were analyzed. RIPC consisted of 4 cycles of 5-min ischemia induced by inflation of pneumatic cuff pressure to 200 mmHg, followed by 5-min reperfusion comprising deflation of the cuff on the upper arm. Platelet activation was assessed using flow cytometry analysis of platelet activation markers. The primary endpoint was the AUC of CD62P expression during the first 3 h after initiation of CPB. Secondary outcomes were the AUC of PAC-1 expression and monocyte-platelet aggregates (MPA) during 3 h of CPB. The AUCs of CD62P expression during 3 h after initiation of CPB were 219.4 ± 43.9 and 211.0 ± 41.2 MFI in the RIPC and sham-RIPC groups, respectively (mean difference, 8.42; 95% CI, -14.8 and 31.7 MFI; p =.471). The AUCs of PAC-1 expression and MPA did not differ between groups. RIPC did not alter platelet activation and reactivity during CPB in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Remote ischemic preconditioning inhibits platelet αIIb β3 activation in coronary artery disease patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy: A randomized trial

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) inhibits agonist-induced conformational activation of platelet αIIb β3 in patients with coronary artery disease already receiving conventional antiplatelet therapy.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Consecutive patients with angiographically confirmed coronary artery disease were randomized to RIPC or sham treatment. Venous blood was collected before and immediately after RIPC/sham. Platelet aggregometry (ADP, arachidonic acid) and whole blood platelet flow cytometry was performed for CD62P, CD63, active αIIb β3 (PAC-1 binding) before and after stimulation with ADP, thrombin ± collagen, or PAR-1 thrombin receptor agonist.

RESULTS

Patients (25 RIPC, 23 sham) were well matched, 83% male, age (mean ± standard deviation) 63.3 ± 13.2 years, 95% aspirin, 81% P2Y12 inhibitor. RIPC did not affect platelet aggregation, nor agonist-induced expression of CD62P, but selectively and significantly decreased αIIb β3 activation after stimulation with either PAR-1 agonist peptide or the combination of thrombin + collagen, but not after ADP nor thrombin alone. The effect of RIPC on platelet αIIb β3 activation was evident in patients receiving both aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor, and was not associated with an increase in vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation.

CONCLUSIONS

Remote ischemic preconditioning inhibits conformational activation of platelet αIIb β3 in response to exposure to thrombin and collagen in patients with coronary artery disease receiving dual antiplatelet therapy. These findings indicate agonist-specific inhibition of platelet activation by RIPC in coronary artery disease that is not obviated by the prior use of P2Y12 inhibitors.

Effect of remote ischaemic conditioning on platelet reactivity and endogenous fibrinolysis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a substudy of the CONDI-2/ERIC-PPCI randomized controlled trial

AIMS

Remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) has been shown to reduce myocardial infarct size in animal models of myocardial infarction. Platelet thrombus formation is a critical determinant of outcome in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Whether the beneficial effects of RIC are related to thrombotic parameters is unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a substudy of the Effect of Remote Ischaemic Conditioning on clinical outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (ERIC-PPCI) trial, we assessed the effect of RIC on thrombotic status. Patients presenting with STEMI were randomized to immediate RIC consisting of an automated autoRIC™ cuff on the upper arm inflated to 200 mmHg for 5 min and deflated for 5 min for four cycles (n = 53) or sham (n = 47). Venous blood was tested at presentation, discharge (48 h) and 6-8 weeks, to assess platelet reactivity, coagulation, and endogenous fibrinolysis using the Global Thrombosis Test and thromboelastography. Baseline thrombotic status was similar in the two groups. At discharge, there was some evidence that the time to in vitro thrombotic occlusion under high shear stress was longer with RIC compared to sham (454 ± 105 s vs. 403 ± 105 s; mean difference 50.1 s; 95% confidence interval 93.7-6.4, P = 0.025), but this was no longer apparent at 6-8 weeks. There was no difference in clot formation or endogenous fibrinolysis between the study arms at any time point.

CONCLUSION

RIC may reduce platelet reactivity in the first 48 h post-STEMI. Further research is needed to delineate mechanisms through which RIC may reduce platelet reactivity, and whether it may improve outcomes in patients with persistent high on-treatment platelet reactivity.

Effect of remote ischaemic conditioning on coagulation function as measured by whole blood impedance aggregometry and rotational thromboelastometry in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: A randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) has been shown to prevent platelet activation during ablation for atrial fibrillation. RIC has also been associated with more postoperative transfusion in the off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OPCAB) patients. We evaluated the effects of RIC on coagulation function in OPCAB patients.

METHODS

A total of 58 patients undergoing OPCAB were randomised to the RIC or control group. In the RIC group, four cycles of 5 min of ischaemia and 5 min of reperfusion were applied twice to the upper arm after the induction of anaesthesia (preconditioning), and after the completion of coronary anastomoses (postconditioning). Whole blood impedance aggregometry (Multiplate®) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) were performed before the induction of anaesthesia, at the end of surgery, and at postoperative day 1.

RESULTS

The trend towards a decrease in adenosine diphosphate-induced whole blood aggregation at the end of surgery was greater in the RIC group than in the control group, but this effect was not statistically significant (-10.4 [18.1] vs. -5.7 [24.8] U, P = 0.424). In ROTEM® analysis, the EXTEM area under the velocity curve was lower in the RIC group than in the control group at the end of surgery (3567 [1399-5794] vs. 5693 [4718-6179] mm∗100, respectively; P = 0.030). A tendency of larger perioperative blood loss was identified in the RIC group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although some parameters indicated a tendency for hypocoagulation in the RIC group at the end of surgery, most effects were not statistically significant. RIC does not significantly affect perioperative platelet aggregability and coagulation in patients undergoing OPCAB.

Ischemic Preconditioning Promotes Post-Exercise Hypotension in a Session of Resistance Exercise in Normotensive Trained Individuals

Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) is a method that has been used prior to resistance exercise to improve performance. However, little is known about its effect before a resistance exercise training session on hemodynamic responses. Thus, the aim of the study was to verify the acute effect of IPC before a session of resistance exercises on the systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean blood pressure (MBP) of trained normotensive trained individuals. Sixteen men (25.3 ± 1.7 years; 78.4 ± 6.2 kg; 176.9 ± 5.4 cm, 25.1 ± 1.5 m².kg⁻¹) trained in resistance exercise (RE) (5.0 ± 1.7 years) were evaluated in five sessions on non-consecutive days. The first two sessions’ subjects performed one repetition maximum (RM) test and retest, and for the next three sessions, they performed the experimental protocols: (a) IPC + RE; (b) SHAM + RE; (c) RE. The RE protocol consisted of six multi-joint exercises, three sets at 80% of 1RM until concentric failure. Blood pressure was monitored pre-session, immediately after and every 10 min for 60 min after RE. IPC consisted of 4 × 5 min of vascular occlusion/reperfusion at 220 mmHg. SHAM (fake protocol) consisted of 20 mmHg of vascular occlusion/reperfusion. The IPC + RE protocol showed significant reductions on SBP, DBP, and MBP compared with SHAM + RE (p < 0.05) and with RE (p < 0.05). The IPC + RE protocol presented a greater magnitude and duration of post-exercise hypotension (PEH) from 20 to 60 min after exercise in SBP (−11 to 14 mmHg), DBP (−5 to 14 mmHg), and MBP (−7 to 13 mmHg). Therefore, we can conclude that the application of IPC before an RE session potentiated the PEH in normotensive individuals trained in resistance exercise.

Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on electrophysiological parameters in nonvalvular paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: The RIPPAF Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains the most relevant arrhythmia with a prevalence of 2%. The treatment options are either highly invasive and cost-intensive or limited by potential side effects or insufficient efficacy. However, no direct means of prevention that could reduce the burden of AF have been tested.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has an impact on inducibility and sustainability of AF.

METHODS

A total of 146 patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing electrophysiology study were randomized to receive either RIPC, performed by short episodes of forearm ischemia, or sham intervention (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02779660). Effective refractory periods, conduction times, velocities, and conduction delays measured were analyzed by pacing from the coronary sinus (CS). End points of the study were the inducibility and sustainability of AF after prespecified rapid pacing sequences.

RESULTS

RIPC significantly reduces the inducibility (odds ratio 0.35; 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.71; P = .003) and sustainability (odds ratio 0.36; 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.81; P = .01) of AF. Furthermore, it decreased dispersion of atrial refractory periods (16.0 ± 14.0 ms vs 22.7 ± 19.0 ms; P = .021) as well as atrial conduction delays (49.2 ± 19.6 ms vs 56.2 ± 22.5 ms; P = .049 for proximal CS and 42.4 ± 16.6 ms vs 49.8 ± 22.2 ms; P = .029 for distal CS). In the whole cohort, longer atrial conduction delay (57.6 ± 22.2 ms vs 50.0 ± 20.5 ms; P = .044) and slower conduction velocity (1.74 ± 0.3 mm/ms vs 1.93 ± 0.5 mm/ms; P = .006) were associated with inducibility of AF whereas a wider dispersion of effective refractory periods (25.9 ± 18.3 ms vs 15.7 ± 11.6 ms; P = .028) maintained AF episodes.

CONCLUSION

RIPC reduces the inducibility and sustainability of AF, which is possibly mediated by changes in electrophysiological properties of the atria. It may be used as a simple noninvasive procedure to reduce AF burden.

Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on hemostasis and fibrinolysis in head and neck cancer surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Introduction

The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to investigate if remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) reduced platelet aggregation and increased fibrinolysis in cancer patients undergoing surgery and thereby reduced the risk of thrombosis.

Materials and methods

Head and neck cancer patients undergoing tumor resection and microsurgical reconstruction were randomized 1:1 to RIPC or sham intervention. RIPC was administered intraoperatively with an inflatable tourniquet by four cycles of 5-min upper extremity occlusion and 5-min reperfusion. The primary endpoint was collagen-induced platelet aggregation measured with Multiplate as area-under-the-curve on the first postoperative day. Secondary endpoints were markers of primary hemostasis, secondary hemostasis, and fibrinolysis. Clinical data on thromboembolic and bleeding complications were prospectively collected at 30-day follow-up. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed.

Results

Sixty patients were randomized to RIPC (n = 30) or sham intervention (n = 30). No patients were lost to follow-up. The relative mean [95% confidence interval] collagen-induced platelet aggregation was 1.26 [1.11;1.40] in the RIPC group and 1.17 [1.07;1.27] in the sham group on the first postoperative day reported as ratios compared with baseline (P = 0.30). Median (interquartile range) 50% fibrin clot lysis time was 517 (417–660) sec in the RIPC group and 614 (468–779) sec in the sham group (P = 0.25). The postoperative pulmonary embolism rate did not differ between groups (P = 1.0).

Conclusions

RIPC did not influence hemostasis and fibrinolysis in head and neck cancer patients undergoing surgery. RIPC did not reduce the rate of thromboembolic complications.

Platelets in cardiac ischaemia/reperfusion injury: a promising therapeutic target

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the single leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. A key component of AMI therapy is the timely reopening of occluded vessels to prevent further ischaemic damage to the myocardium. However, reperfusion of the ischaemic myocardium can itself trigger reperfusion injury causing up to 50% of the overall infarct size. In recent years, considerable research has been devoted to understanding the pathogenesis of ischaemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury and platelets have emerged as a major contributing factor. This review summarizes the role of platelets in the pathogenesis of I/R injury and highlights the potential of platelet-directed therapeutics to minimize cardiac I/R injury. Activated platelets infiltrate specifically into the ischaemic/reperfused myocardium and contribute to I/R injury by the formation of microthrombi, enhanced platelet-leucocyte aggregation, and the release of potent vasoconstrictor and pro-inflammatory molecules. This review demonstrates the benefits of platelet inhibition beyond their well-described anti-thrombotic effect and highlights the direct cardioprotective role of anti-platelet drugs. In particular, the inhibition of COX, the P2Y12 receptor and the GPIIb/IIIa receptor has demonstrated the potential to attenuate I/R injury. Moreover, targeting of drug candidates or regenerative cells to the activated platelets accumulated within the ischaemic/reperfused myocardium shows remarkable potential to protect the myocardium from I/R injury. Overall, activated platelets play a key role in the pathogenesis of I/R injury. Their direct inhibition as well as their use as epitopes for site-directed therapy is a unique and promising therapeutic approach for the prevention of I/R injury and ultimately the preservation of cardiac function.

Effects of remote ischemic post-conditioning on platelet activation of AMI patients

The recovery of ischemic myocardium blood perfusion is the main treatment option for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, this treatment option has multiple side effects that directly affect the quality of life of the patients. The activation of platelet function plays an important role in the occurrence, development and treatment of AMI. The aim of the present study was to analyze the effects of remote ischemic post-conditioning on platelet activation of AMI patients with primary PCI treatment and clinical prognosis. A total of 71 patients with AMI were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). They were randomly divided into control group (n=34) and observation group (n=37). The patients in the observation group were treated with remote ischemic post-conditioning. Further, flow cytometer was used to detect the platelet alpha granule membrane glycoprotein (CD62P) and the percentages of activated IIb/IIIa (PAC-1). The maximum platelet aggregation rate induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and arachidonic acid (AA) was measured by light transmittance aggrometer. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was compared between the two groups during the follow-up period of 6 months. The percentage of CD62P (24 h after PCI) in the observation group was significantly lower than control group (P<0.05). Further, the incidence of MACE in the observation group was also lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). Remote ischemic post-conditioning could reduce the incidence of MACE in patients with AMI after primary PCI treatment. Moreover, the above observation may be related to the improvement of platelet CD62P activation.

Ischemic Conditioning Attenuates Platelet-Mediated Thrombosis

Data obtained in both preclinical models and humans have revealed that the favorable cardiac consequences of ischemic conditioning extend beyond a direct effect on the cardiomyocyte. In the current review, we summarize our as-yet limited understanding of the complex relationships between ischemic conditioning, platelet activation–aggregation, and cardioprotection.

Effect of long-term remote ischaemic conditioning on platelet function and fibrinolysis in patients with chronic ischaemic heart failure

INTRODUCTION

Remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) protects against ischaemia-reperfusion injury through cellular protective pathways, but may also modulate haemostasis. We aimed to investigate the effect of long-term RIC on platelet function and fibrinolysis in patients with chronic ischaemic heart failure (CIHF).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a prospective, outcome-assessor blinded, paired study, 16 patients with CIHF and 21 age- and gender-matched controls without ischaemic heart disease (IHD) were treated with RIC once daily for 28±4days. RIC was performed as four cycles of 5min upper arm ischaemia and reperfusion. We evaluated collagen and arachidonic acid induced platelet aggregation (Multiplate® Analyzer), platelet turnover (Sysmex® XE-5000), platelet activation (plasma soluble-platelet-selectin) and fibrinolysis (clot lysis time, tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1)). We compared blood samples assessed at baseline and following long-term RIC.

RESULTS

Long-term RIC did not affect platelet aggregation, turnover or activation or PAI-1 in any study groups. Long-term RIC did not affect fibrin clot lysis time in patients with CIHF but reduced fibrin clot lysis time in matched controls without IHD (median: 773s (interquartile range: 689-936) vs. 658s (618-823), p=0.03). t-PA was increased following long-term RIC in CIHF patients (2.5 (1.7-3.4) vs. 2.9 (1.8-4.0), p=0.03) and in matched controls without IHD (1.5 (1.3-1.9) vs. 1.6 (1.4-2.3), p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

While long-term RIC did not affect collagen or arachidonic acid induced platelet aggregation, platelet turnover or sP-selectin, fibrinolysis was increased although most consistently in matched controls without IHD. This finding suggests that RIC may stimulate fibrinolysis potentially reducing the risk of thrombosis.

Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on electrophysiological and biomolecular parameters in nonvalvular paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (RIPPAF study): Rationale and study design of a randomized, controlled clinical trial

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been studied in models of different cardiovascular entities. Recently, a beneficial effect of RIPC on incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in postsurgical patients has been suggested. However, the potential impact of RIPC on electrophysiological- and thrombogenesis-related parameters in the setting of paroxysmal nonvalvular AF has not been investigated. The aim of the study is to answer the following questions: (1) Does RIPC have impact on inducibility of AF in patients with known paroxysmal AF? If yes, what are the direct electrophysiological mechanisms of this phenomenon, and could RIPC be implemented to reduce AF burden? (2) Does RIPC have the potential to minimize thrombogenic effects of simulated episodes of AF? If so, what are inhibited components of thrombogenesis and can this be used to reduce thromboembolic risk related to paroxysmal AF? The presented study is a 2-arm, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, single-center trial in a cohort of 146 patients with paroxysmal AF referred for AF ablation in sinus rhythm. The study will collect electrophysiological data such as variability of P-wave morphology, atrial refractory period, conduction times, and inducibility/sustainability of AF. Furthermore, AF-induced prothrombotic processes will be analyzed by quantification of platelet aggregates, analysis of platelet function, and measurement of thrombogenesis-related plasma markers. Moreover, the study will provide a unique bio-database for further analysis of molecular and genetic mechanisms responsible for observed results.

Ischaemic conditioning and targeting reperfusion injury: a 30 year voyage of discovery

To commemorate the auspicious occasion of the 30th anniversary of IPC, leading pioneers in the field of cardioprotection gathered in Barcelona in May 2016 to review and discuss the history of IPC, its evolution to IPost and RIC, myocardial reperfusion injury as a therapeutic target, and future targets and strategies for cardioprotection. This article provides an overview of the major topics discussed at this special meeting and underscores the huge importance and impact, the discovery of IPC has made in the field of cardiovascular research.

Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Platelet Activation Induced by Coronary Procedures

In this study, we aim to assess whether remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) reduces platelet activation during coronary angiography (CA) and/or percutaneous coronary interventions. We studied 30 patients who underwent CA because of a suspect of stable angina. Patients were randomized to RIPC (3 short episodes of forearm ischemia) or sham RIPC (controls) before the procedure. Blood samples were collected at baseline, at the end of the procedure, and 24 hours later. Monocyte-platelet aggregate (MPA) formation and platelet CD41 in the MPA gate and CD41 and CD62 expression in the platelet gate were assessed by flow cytometry, in the absence and in the presence of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) stimulation. A significant increase in platelet activation occurred during the invasive procedure in controls, which persisted at 24 hours. However, compared with controls, RIPC group showed no or a lower increase in platelet variables, including MPA formation (p <0.0001) and CD41 (p = 0.002) in the MPA gate and CD41 (p <0.0001) and CD62 (p = 0.002) in the platelet gate. ADP increased platelet activation at baseline, but did not further increase platelet reactivity during the invasive procedure in either groups. Percutaneous coronary interventions, performed in 10 patients (6 in the RIPC group and 4 in controls), did not have any further significant effect on platelet activation and reactivity compared with CA alone. In conclusion, RIPC reduces platelet activation occurring during CA. In contrast, no effects were observed on platelet response to ADP stimulation, probably related to the administration of an ADP antagonist in all patients.

Remote ischemic conditioning

In remote ischemic conditioning (RIC), brief, reversible episodes of ischemia with reperfusion in one vascular bed, tissue, or organ confer a global protective phenotype and render remote tissues and organs resistant to ischemia/reperfusion injury. The peripheral stimulus can be chemical, mechanical, or electrical and involves activation of peripheral sensory nerves. The signal transfer to the heart or other organs is through neuronal and humoral communications. Protection can be transferred, even across species, with plasma-derived dialysate and involves nitric oxide, stromal derived factor-1α, microribonucleic acid-144, but also other, not yet identified factors. Intracardiac signal transduction involves: adenosine, bradykinin, cytokines, and chemokines, which activate specific receptors; intracellular kinases; and mitochondrial function. RIC by repeated brief inflation/deflation of a blood pressure cuff protects against endothelial dysfunction and myocardial injury in percutaneous coronary interventions, coronary artery bypass grafting, and reperfused acute myocardial infarction. RIC is safe and effective, noninvasive, easily feasible, and inexpensive.

Nitroglycerine and sodium trioxodinitrate: from the discovery to the preconditioning effect

The history began in the 19th century with Ascanio Sobrero (1812-1888), the discoverer of glycerol trinitrate (nitroglycerine, NTG), and with Angelo Angeli (1864-1931), the discoverer of sodium trioxodinitrate (Angeli's salt). It is likely that Angeli and Sobrero never met, but their two histories will join each other more than a century later. In fact, it has been discovered that both NTG and Angeli's salt are able to induce a preconditioning effect. As NTG has a long history as an antianginal drug its newly discovered property as a preconditioning agent has also been tested in humans. Angeli's salt properties as a preconditioning and inotropic agent have only been tested in animals so far.

Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Platelet Activation and Reactivity Induced by Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Background—

Radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation has been associated with some risk of thromboembolic events. Previous studies showed that preventive short episodes of forearm ischemia (remote ischemic preconditioning [IPC]) reduce exercise-induced platelet reactivity. In this study, we assessed whether remote IPC has any effect on platelet activation induced by radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Methods and Results—

We randomized 19 patients (age, 54.7±11 years; 17 male) undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation to receive remote IPC or sham intermittent forearm ischemia (control subjects) before the procedure. Blood venous samples were collected before and after remote IPC/sham ischemia, at the end of the ablation procedure, and 24 hours later. Platelet activation and reactivity were assessed by flow cytometry by measuring monocyte-platelet aggregate formation, platelet CD41 in the monocyte-platelet aggregate gate, and platelet CD41 and CD62 in the platelet gate in the absence and presence of ADP stimulation. At baseline, there were no differences between groups in platelet variables. Radiofrequency ablation induced platelet activation in both groups, which persisted after 24 hours. However, compared with control subjects, remote IPC patients showed a lower increase in all platelet variables, including monocyte-platelet aggregate formation ( P <0.0001), CD41 in the monocyte-platelet aggregate gate ( P =0.002), and CD41 ( P <0.0001) and CD62 ( P =0.002) in the platelet gate. Compared with control subjects, remote IPC was also associated with a significantly lower ADP-induced increase in all platelet markers.

Conclusions—

Our data show that remote IPC before radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation significantly reduces the increased platelet activation and reactivity associated with the procedure.

Does remote ischaemic preconditioning with postconditioning improve clinical outcomes of patients undergoing cardiac surgery? Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning with Postconditioning Outcome Trial

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) combined with remote ischaemic postconditioning (RIPostC) improves the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From June 2009 to November 2010, 1280 patients who underwent elective cardiac surgery were randomized into the RIPC with RIPostC group or the control group in the morning of the surgery. In the RIPC with RIPostC group, four cycles of 5-min ischaemia and 5-min reperfusion were administered twice to the upper limb-before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) or coronary anastomoses for RIPC and after CPB or coronary anastomoses for RIPostC. The primary endpoint was the composite of major adverse outcomes, including death, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, stroke, coma, renal failure or dysfunction, respiratory failure, cardiogenic shock, gastrointestinal complication, and multiorgan failure. Remote ischaemic preconditioning with RIPostC did not reduce the composite outcome compared with the control group (38.0 vs. 38.1%, respectively; P = 0.998) and there was no difference in each major adverse outcome. The intensive care unit and hospital stays were not different between the two groups. However, in the off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery subgroup, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that RIPC with RIPostC was related to increased composite outcome (odds ratio: 1.54; 95% confidence interval: 1.02-2.30; P = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

Remote ischaemic preconditioning with RIPostC by transient upper limb ischaemia did not improve clinical outcome in patients who underwent cardiac surgery.