Atrioventricular and associated intraventricular conduction disturbances in acute myocardial infarction

His-bundle electrogram in the convalescent stage of inferior myocardial infarction complicated with complete A-V block

Twelve patients with inferior wall myocardial infarction complicated with complete atrioventricular block during the acute stage were studied. The His-bundle electrogram was studied in the convalescent stage at an average of 6 months after the acute attack. The age of the patients was 62 +/- 16 years. The width of the QRS complex was within the normal range and the PR interval was less than 200 msec. AH time was 74 +/- 18 msec (mean +/- SD). No split H activity was observed. HV time however, was significantly prolonged in the 12 patients; 54 +/- 12 msec vs. 42 +/- 9 msec in the control group (p less than 0.02). Five patients had HV time equal to or more than 60 msec. Intra-His block was suggested to exist in a high frequency in the patients who had previous complete AV block during the acute stage of myocardial infarction of the inferior wall.

Left ventricular systolic time intervals in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Left ventricular systolic time intervals were measured daily during 601 episodes of acute myocardial infarction. The ratio of pre-ejection period to ejection period during the first 24 hours permitted patients to be arranged in six prognostic groups with mortalities while in hospital ranging from 4 to 60 per cent. The only factors completely independent of the systolic time intervals which were shown statistically to be associated with high mortality while in hospital were defects in atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction.

The clinical significance of bundle branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. 1. Clinical characteristics, hospital mortality, and one-year follow-up

To provide an understanding of the clinical characteristics of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and bundle branch block, experience from five centers was accumulated. Patients in whom bundle branch block first appeared after the onset of cardiogenic shock were excluded. In 432 patients, the most common types of block were left (38%) and right with left anterior fascicular block (34%). In 42% of the patients, bundle branch block was new. Progression to high degree (second or third degree) atrioventricular (AV) block via a Type II pattern occurred in 22% of the patients. Hospital and first year follow-up mortality rates were 28% and 28%, respectively. Only 46% of the patients developed pulmonary edema or shock (Killip Class III or IV), and hospital mortality was related to the amount of heart failure (8%, 7%, 27%, 83% for Killip Classes I-IV, respectively). Patients with progression to second degree or third degree AV block via a Type II pattern had increased hospital mortality compared with patients without this complication (47% vs 23%, P less than 0.001). In the absence of pulmonary edema or shock, patients with Type II second degree or third degree AV block still had a higher mortality rate than patients without advanced AV block (31% vs 2%, P less than 0.005), with nearly all the deaths due to abrupt development of AV block. Thus, in many patients MI with bundle branch block is associated with severe heart failure. However, this was not true for a majority of the patients, in whom therapy aimed at preventing morbidity and mortality due to the bradyarrhythmia of advanced AV block might be beneficial.

The clinical significance of bundle branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. 2. Indications for temporary and permanent pacemaker insertion

The indication for prophylactic temporary and permanent pacing during acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by bundle branch block is high risk of progression via a Type II pattern to second or third degree (high degree) AV block during hospitalization or follow-up. In this study, determinants of high degree AV block during hospitalization and sudden death or recurrent high degree block during the first year of follow-up were examined in 432 patients with MI and bundle branch block. Timing of onset of bundle branch block, the involved fascicles, and the PR interval were examined as determinants of risk of progression to high degree AV block during MI. At highest risk were 186 patients with blocks involving the right bundle and at least one fascicle of the left bundle which were not documented on prior electrocardiograms. Risk was similar with (38%) or without (31%) accompanying first degree AV block. Patients with transient high degree AV block during MI had a 28% incidence of sudden death or recurrent high degree block during the first year of follow-up. Patients not continuously paced had a higher incidence of sudden death or recurrent high degree block than patients continuously paced (65% vs 10%, P less than 0.001). Sudden death during follow-up also occurred in 13% of patients without high degree block during MI. A subgroup with 1) documented prior MI, 2) anterior or indeterminant acute MI, and 3) no symptoms of cardiac failure had a 35% risk of sudden death. The role of permanent pacing in this group is unknown. Thus, patients at high risk of high degree AV block should receive prophylactic temporary pacing. Patients who survive high degree block with MI should receive temporary and then permanent pacing. Patients without high degree AV block during MI who nervertheless have a high risk of sudden death may benefit from permanent pacing.

Complete heart block with normal QRS duration occurring distal to the his bundle in acute inferior myocardial infarction

A patient with acute inferior myocardial infarction developed on the second day complete heart block with normal QRS duration, and the block was found to be distal to the His bundle. To our knowledge, this is the first such documented case in the English literature. Failure of the preceding Wenckebach periods and of complete heart block to respond to intravenous atropine may be a clinical clue to the nature of this type of heart block. The implications and possible explanations are discussed in the light of recent knowledge concerning the nature of heart block in inferior wall myocardial infarction.