Wenckebach phenomenon in the exit area from a transvenous pacing electrode

Diagnostic Value of the 12-Lead Electrocardiogram during Conventional and Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization

The paced 12-lead ECG is a valuable tool in the assessment of patients with pacemakers, and ideally should be recorded routinely at the time of implantation and during follow-up. It has become particularly important in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization. The multiplicity of clinical situations described in this review highlight the pitfalls of using a single ECG lead in the overall evaluation of pacemaker patients. The design of programmers capable of registering a 12-lead ECG would obviate the need of an additional electrocardiograph and encourage the routine recording of the paced 12-lead ECG with each patient encounter. Such an arrangement would improve the care of pacemaker patients.

Latency During Left Ventricular Pacing From the Lateral Cardiac Veins: A Cause of Ineffectual Biventricular Pacing

We report three patients with cardiomyopathy and pronounced stimulus to QRS latency during left ventricular (LV) pacing from an epicardial cardiac vein. Delayed LV activation during simultaneous biventricular pacing produced an electrocardiographic pattern dominated by right ventricular stimulation. Hemodynamic parameters improved immediately after advancing LV stimulation (in one patient) or pacing the LV only (in two patients) coupled with dramatic improvement of heart failure symptoms.

Ventricular Wenckebach after intravenous therapy with class I antiarrhythmic agents

Two unusual cases of Wenckebach-like conduction block in the infranodal tissues which developed after an intravenous dose of a Class I antiarrhythmic drug are presented. The first case shows infra-Hisian Wenckebach during sustained atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. The second case demonstrates rate-dependent Wenckebach-like exit block between the pacing catheter and the right ventricular tissues during pacing.

Effects of beta-adrenergic stimulation on atrial latency and atrial vulnerability in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia

To assess the effects of beta-adrenergic stimulation on atrial latency and atrial vulnerability, the electrophysiologic properties of the atrium were studied before and during intravenous infusion of isoproterenol at 2 to 5 micrograms/min in 11 patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia exhibiting atrial latency during programmed atrial extrastimulation. In all patients, the isoproterenol infusion reduced the extent of maximum atrial latency (from 86 +/- 19 to 62 +/- 16 ms, p less than 0.001). This was accompanied by a significant shortening of both effective and functional refractory periods of the atrium (from 213 +/- 31 to 174 +/- 40 ms, p less than 0.005 and from 259 +/- 31 to 215 +/- 29 ms, p less than 0.001, respectively). The intra-atrial and interatrial conduction times were also significantly reduced (from 24 +/- 15 and 63 +/- 17 to 15 +/- 10 and 48 +/- 15 ms, p less than 0.005, respectively). In 3 patients with demonstrable atrial vulnerability, the isoproterenol infusion abolished the inducibility of repetitive atrial responses or atrial flutter, or both. Although the clinical significance of the suppressive action of beta-adrenergic stimulation on atrial vulnerability remains to be determined, the present study has demonstrated that beta-adrenergic stimulation significantly reduces atrial latency.

Pacing threshold interval with decreasing and increasing output

The study was made in 44 patients, of which 23 received a new endocardial electrode and 21 were investigated during pulse-generator replacement. Indication for pacemaker therapy was sino-atrial bradycardia in 12 patients and atrio-ventricular block in 32 patients. When the pacing threshold was determined with decreasing output it was found to be 0.6V/0.7 mA for new implantations and 2.0 V/2.0 mA with pulse generator replacement. When determined with increasing output the threshold was found to be an average 0.20 V/0.20 mA higher than when determined with decreasing output (threshold interval). The maximal difference observed was 0.70 V/0.55 mA. This threshold interval was of the same size irrespective of pacemaker indication and spontaneous activity and whether the electrode was newly implanted or not. Pacemaker ventricular block of Mobitz type I with Wenckebach periodicity was never observed.

Conduction disturbances between a pacemaker electrode and the myocardium in right ventricular infarction

Rate dependent first degree block, which was followed by a complete block, between a pacemaker electrode and the ventricular myocardium, was observed in a patient with inferior myocardial infarction. These conduction disturbances which occurred during pacing at the postero-basal wall of the right ventricle and not during pacing at the apex, suggested that the posterior part of the right ventricle was damaged. This hypothesis was supported by hemodynamic findings which indicated a right ventricular infarction.

Two unusual cases of intra-atrial gap

Two cases are described in which, during investigation of rhythm disturbances, it was shown that, by delivering atrial stimuli of increasing prematurity, a point was reached where the artificial stimulus failed to induce an atrial response. However, with even more premature stimulations, atrial responses were again observed. These observations are best explained by a gap phenomenon in which very early stimuli delivered during the effective refractory period of the atria were delayed long enough in the exit area around the pacing electrode to allow atrial recovery.