Acute intravenous and sustained oral treatment with the beta1 agonist prenalterol in patients with chronic severe cardiac failure

Time course of improvement in left ventricular function, mass and geometry in patients with congestive heart failure treated with beta-adrenergic blockade

OBJECTIVES

We examined the time course of ventricular functional improvement in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy who received beta-blockade and the long-term effects of beta-blockade on ventricular mass and geometry in these patients.

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that beta-adrenergic blocking agents when administered long term improve ventricular function in patients with heart failure. However, the time course of improvement in ventricular function and the long-term effects of beta-blockade on ventricular mass and geometry are not known.

METHODS

Twenty-six men with dilated cardiomyopathy underwent serial echocardiography on days 0 and 1 and months 1 and 3 of either metoprolol (n = 16) or standard therapy (n = 10). At 3 months all patients on standard therapy were crossed over to metoprolol, and late echocardiograms were obtained after 18 +/- 5 (mean +/- SD) months of metoprolol therapy. All echocardiograms were read in blinded manner.

RESULTS

Patients treated with metoprolol had an initial decline (day 1 vs. day 0) in ventricular function (increase in end-systolic volume and decrease in ejection fraction). Ventricular function improved between months 1 and 3 (p = 0.013, metoprolol vs. standard therapy). Left ventricular mass regressed at 18 months (333 +/- 85 to 275 +/- 53 g, p = 0.011) but not at 3 months. Left ventricular shape became less spherical and assumed a more normal elliptical shape by 18 months (major/minor axis ratio 1.5 +/- 0.2 to 1.7 +/- 0.2, p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with heart failure treated with metoprolol do not demonstrate an improvement in systolic performance until after 1 month of therapy and may have a mild reduction in function initially. Long-term therapy with metoprolol results in a reversal of maladaptive remodeling with reduction in left ventricular volumes, regression of left ventricular mass and improved ventricular geometry by 18 months.

Therapeutic controversies with use of beta-adrenoceptor blockade in heart failure

In response to early reports indicating a beneficial adrenoceptor effect of beta blockade, 2 small trials were conducted to investigate the hemodynamic effects of acute and chronic beta-adrenoceptor blockade in patients with congestive cardiomyopathy. Acute beta-blocker therapy with intravenous acebutolol, 25 mg, resulted in a significant decline in cardiac performance, whereas chronic therapy with acebutolol, 200 mg twice daily, resulted in no beneficial effects on exercise tolerance, as reported by the original Swedish investigators. Further, beta-adrenoceptor blockade has been associated with a number of clinical problems: beta blockers tend to interfere with the compensatory mechanisms that support circulation during early or mild heart failure and therefore have little value as routine therapy at that stage of the disorder. Although excessive beta-adrenoceptor blockade may worsen ventricular function by decreasing myocardial contractility, beta blockers appear to have a useful role in patients with moderate heart failure accompanied by tachycardia. Carefully titrated doses of beta blockers in conjunction with afterload-reducing agents may also provide a benefit in patients with rapid heart rates and grossly elevated levels of circulating catecholamines.

Effects of xamoterol on inotropic and lusitropic properties of the human myocardium and on adenylate cyclase activity

The purpose of the present study was to characterize the effects of xamoterol in the human myocardium. In the presence of forskolin or milrinone, xamoterol increased isometric force of contraction, contraction velocity, and relaxation velocity in isolated, electrically driven preparations from human myocardium, but had no effect alone. There was no difference in the effect of xamoterol between right atrial myocardium and left ventricular myocardium from nonfailing (NF), moderately failing (NYHA II-III), and severely failing (NYHA IV) human hearts. The positive inotropic and lusitropic effects of isoprenaline were reduced depending on the severity of heart failure in left ventricular myocardium (i.e., NF greater than NYHA II-III greater than NYHA IV). In the presence of norepinephrine, xamoterol produced negative inotropic effects similar to those of the beta-adrenoceptor antagonists pindolol and propranolol. Xamoterol alone had no effects on force of contraction, whereas pindolol and propranolol markedly reduced contractile force. In NYHA class IV, isoprenaline stimulated adenylate cyclase about twofold but xamoterol, like pindolol or propranolol, had no effect. Experiments with the beta 1- and beta 2-selective antagonists CGP 207.12A and ICI 118.551, respectively, showed that the positive inotropic and lusitropic effects of xamoterol were mediated by beta 1-adrenoceptors. Consistently, xamoterol had a selectivity of 13.8 at beta 1-adrenoceptors as measured in radioligand binding experiments. It is concluded that xamoterol acts as a beta 1-adrenoceptor antagonist with a selectivity of 13.8 in human ventricular myocardium. The compound has an intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, as it produces beta 1-adrenoceptor-mediated positive inotropic and lusitropic effects in the presence of forskolin. The beneficial effects of xamoterol in patients with heart failure could be due to prevention of the detrimental effects of norepinephrine such as beta 1-adrenoceptor downregulation of an increase of Gi (inhibitory guanine-nucleotide binding protein).

Medical management of chronic heart failure: inotropic, vasodilator, or inodilator drugs?

On the basis of pathophysiologic mechanisms, the medical therapy of today for chronic heart failure is reviewed. The advantages and disadvantages of the vasodilator drugs and the inotropic drugs are presented. Finally, the therapeutic value of the inodilator drugs, which combine the central myocardial effects of positive inotropic agents with those of peripheral vasodilators, is discussed. In particular, the orally available dopaminergic agents, such as ibopamine, which interact with beta-receptors in the heart (mediating a positive inotropic effect) as well as with dopaminergic receptors in the peripheral vessels (mediating a systemic vasodilator effect) and in the kidneys (potentiating the natriuretic effect of diuresis), seem to be an advancement in the modern medical therapy of chronic heart failure. Data are shown during long-term treatment with ibopamine, in which the sustained clinical benefit in heart failure was not diminished, despite a decrease of the adrenergic receptors in blood cells. Dopamine plasma concentration was permanently normalized during long-term treatment. The discrepancy between clinical improvement and the measured adrenergic downregulation may be due to the interference of the inodilator with neurohormonal systems at multiple sites and is probably independent of receptor activation. It is suggested that the biosynthesis of noradrenaline is improved by increasing intracellular dopamine transport.

[Alterations of the cAMP-adenylate cyclase system in the failing human heart. Consequences for the therapy with inotropic drugs]

In heart failure, an increase in the activity of the sympathetic nervous system takes place to maintain perfusion pressure to vital organs, resulting in increased levels of noradrenaline in the blood of these patients. This permanent stimulation produces a down-regulation of cardiac beta-adrenoceptors. Since noradrenaline acts primarily on the cardiac beta 1-adrenoceptor subtype, beta 1-adrenoceptors decrease in number, whereas the beta 2-adrenoceptor subpopulation remains unchanged in most instances. Consequently, the positive inotropic response to beta-adrenoceptor agonists is diminished. However, there is also a decrease in the positive inotropic effect of beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists, histamine and cAMP-phosphodiesterase inhibitors such as milrinone, whereas the positive inotropic effect of cAMP-independent Na(+)-channel activators such as DPI 206-106 and the effects of cardiac glycosides are not diminished. These observations suggest a more generalised alteration of the cAMP-adenylate cyclase system in the failing heart. Stimulatory guanine nucleotide-binding protein (Gs) couples receptors to adenylate cyclase that stimulate cAMP formation, such as beta-adrenoceptors, histamine receptors and glucagon receptors. In the failing human heart, Gs content has been reported to remain unchanged as compared with that in non-failing myocardium. However, there is a 35%-40% increase in inhibitory guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (Gi), which are involved in the receptor-mediated inhibition of adenylate cyclase. Taken together, two defects of the cAMP-adenylate cyclase system have been identified: an increase in Gi content and a decrease in the number of beta-adrenoceptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The pharmacology of xamoterol: a basis for modulation of the autonomic control of the heart

1. Xamoterol (Corwin, Carwin, Corwil, Xamtol, ICI 118,587) is a beta-adrenoceptor partial agonist which is of benefit in the chronic treatment of heart failure (e.g. The German and Austrian Xamoterol Study Group, 1988). These results contrast with those obtained with other beta-adrenoceptor drugs, prenalterol and pirbuterol which were unsuccessful on chronic dosing (Currie et al., 1984; Glover et al., 1985). 2. Unlike prenalterol and pirbuterol, xamoterol has no significant agonist activity at the beta 2-adrenoceptor and has shown no tachyphylaxis in animals or man. 3. The overall action of xamoterol is to modulate sympathetic control of the heart such that at rest and at low levels of exercise the heart receives inotropic support whilst during more severe exercise, heart rate is reduced. In patients with left ventricular dysfunction these effects lead to an improvement in the relation between filling pressure and cardiac output at all levels of activity such that a given cardiac output is achieved with a lower filling pressure. It is suggested that this alteration in the pattern of cardiac activity over a long period of time results in a beneficial adaptation of the myocardium and is a possible explanation of the observed clinical improvement.

The cardiovascular pharmacology of xamoterol, cicloprolol, prenalterol and pindolol in the anaesthetised dog

An anaesthetised dog preparation was used to examine the pharmacological profiles of xamoterol, cicloprolol, prenalterol and pindolol. The effects of these agents on heart rate and hind limb perfusion pressure revealed that xamoterol is highly cardioselective and has no significant agonist activity at beta 2-receptors and no membrane stabilising effect. These pharmacological properties are not complicated by the formation of active metabolites and may explain the clinical benefits in the long-term treatment of heart failure.

Vasodilator and inotropic drugs for the treatment of chronic heart failure: distinguishing hype from hope

During the past 10 years, more than 80 orally active vasodilator and inotropic agents have been tested in the clinical setting to evaluate their potential utility in the treatment of chronic heart failure. Although the initial reports of all of these drugs suggested that each represented a major therapeutic advance, only three agents--digoxin, captopril and enalapril--have produced consistent long-term hemodynamic and clinical benefits in these severely ill patients. Most of the other drugs that have been tested have not (to date) distinguished themselves from placebo therapy in large-scale, controlled trials, even though these agents produce hemodynamic effects that closely resemble those seen with digitalis and the converting-enzyme inhibitors. These observations suggest that the hemodynamic derangements that characteristically accompany the development of left ventricular dysfunction cannot be considered to be the most important pathophysiologic abnormality in chronic heart failure. Although cardiac contractility is usually depressed in this disease, positive inotropic agents do not consistently improve the clinical status of these patients. Similarly, although the systemic vessels are usually markedly constricted, drugs that ameliorate this vasoconstriction do not consistently relieve symptoms, enhance exercise capacity or prolong life. Hence, correction of the central hemodynamic abnormalities seen in heart failure may not necessarily provide a rational basis for drug development, and future advances in therapy are likely to evolve only by attempting to understand and modify the basic physiologic derangements in this disorder.

Effect of the partial beta-agonist prenalterol on plasma renin activity in patients with left ventricular failure

Beta agonist therapy for heart failure has been disappointing, perhaps because of renin induced aldosteronism. To investigate this possibility we measured plasma renin activity (PRA) in 23 patients (17 male, 6 female, age 41-70) with New York Heart Association stage III heart failure due to ischaemic heart disease in a placebo controlled trial over one month. All patients received constant doses of digoxin and diuretics throughout the trial. Compliance was confirmed in all patients by digoxin and prenalterol assay. In a preliminary (dose titration) study of 9 patients there was a progressive, but non-significant rise of mean PRA from 14.8 to 17.6 and 27.7 ng/ml per h with doses of 20, 50 and 100 mg of prenalterol, respectively. After one month of treatment with prenalterol (n = 11), PRA was 12.8 +/- 2.4 (SEM) ng/ml per h which was not significantly different from the initial level of 14.4 +/- 2.3 ng/ml per h (n.s.). The placebo group (n = 12) results were 13.8 +/- 4.2 ng/ml per h at entry and 14.4 +/- 5.2 ng/ml per h at one month (n.s.). These results indicate that PRA is elevated by acute treatment with the partial beta agonist prenalterol but stimulation of renin secretion does not appear to occur with chronic therapy.

Adverse effects associated with the newer inotropic agents

The ideal inotropic agent should be available for both parenteral and oral administration and be potent and effective long term without significant adverse effects. In recent years, numerous new agents have been developed in an attempt to find a more potent, less toxic alternative to digoxin. beta-Agonists, while useful when given parenterally short term, appear to have their long term oral application limited by adverse effects and the development of tolerance. A number of other non-catecholamine agents, most of which have both inotropic and vasodilator actions, have also been studied. Adverse effects have been relatively frequent and occasionally severe. Of these newer agents none has yet been proven in clinical trials to be safe and effective in the long term.

The future role of inotropic drugs

Inotropic drugs have not, as yet, been shown in double-blind, randomised and placebo-controlled trials to be of value in the treatment of heart failure. There are theoretical reasons why inotropic drugs may initiate arrhythmias, worsen ischaemia and possibly even increase mortality.

Are the clinical benefits of oral prenalterol in ischaemic heart failure due to beta blockade? A six month randomised double blind comparison with placebo

The clinical effects of the oral beta 1 partial agonist, prenalterol, were investigated in 37 patients (29 male, eight female; mean age 57 years) with chronic ischaemic left ventricular failure using a placebo controlled randomised double blind protocol over six months. All patients were limited by dyspnoea (New York Heart Association class III) despite treatment with digoxin and diuretics. Twenty eight patients completed the protocol. Moderate clinical improvement was seen in the prenalterol group, whereas there was little change in the placebo group. Bicycle exercise capacity increased over six months in the prenalterol and placebo groups but only achieved statistical significance for prenalterol when compared with baseline values. Maximum exercise heart rate was significantly reduced in the prenalterol group compared with placebo. Radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction at rest and during exercise and cardiothoracic ratio showed no significant improvement in either group over six months. Prenalterol was well tolerated and produced no increase in frequency of angina or ventricular arrhythmias. Prenalterol produced clinical benefits and improved exercise tolerance while reducing exercise heart rate. A moderate placebo response was noted. The apparent beta blocking effect of prenalterol may be as important as the beta 1 agonist effect in producing these benefits. Prenalterol has, however, been withdrawn because of side effects in animals.