Measurement of mitral regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography

Assessment of ventricular filling volumes with an automated color Doppler method: validation in a pulsatile flow model

OBJECTIVE

Determination of ventricular filling volumes with the use of Doppler echocardiographic measurements critically depends on the presence of a circular-shaped flow area and a flat velocity profile across it because evaluation of flow volume is usually based on echocardiographic measurements of its diameter and pulsed Doppler recordings within the center of this area. The approach may be limited at the mitral and tricuspid ring levels as a result of their noncircular shape and because nonflat velocity profiles are present. The purpose of this study was to examine in a pulsatile flow model simulating ventricular inflow conditions the accuracy of an automated method based on the analysis of color Doppler flow velocities for evaluation of flow volumes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A recently-developed automated Doppler method that takes into account the velocity distribution across a region of interest was examined in a pulsatile flow model by using flows with waveforms characteristic for ventricular inflow through tubes with elliptically-shaped cross-sectional areas. Color Doppler imaging was performed against flow direction along the major and minor axes of the tubes with major diameters ranging between 3 and 5 cm and major-to-minor diameter ratios of 1.5 and 2.0.

RESULTS

A close correlation was found between flow volumes measured by the Doppler technique for registrations along the minor or major axis of the ellipses and actual values (r = 0.99, standard error of the estimate = 0.44 to 1.98 mL), with a systematic underestimation or overestimation, respectively, depending on the diameter ratio. Averaging of the data derived from 2 orthogonal measurements by using the geometric mean value yielded an excellent agreement between Doppler data and actual flow volumes.

CONCLUSION

This automated color Doppler method enables reliable determination of flow volumes in a pulsatile flow model simulating ventricular inflow conditions with the use of 2 orthogonal imaging views. The data indicate that the method may improve the noninvasive evaluation of ventricular filling volumes.

Effects of Dobutamine Infusion on Mitral Regurgitation

Both intensity of mitral regurgitant murmur and color-coded Doppler regurgitant signal area have been reported to correlate with the degree of regurgitation. To evaluate the relationship between the intensity of regurgitant murmur and severity of mitral regurgitation, phonocardiography, echocardiography, and Doppler ultrasound were performed in 18 patients with mitral regurgitation before and during dobutamine infusion. Mitral regurgitation was due to mitral valve prolapse with ruptured chordae tendineae in 8 patients, rheumatic change in 5 patients, and dilated cardiomyopathy in 5 patients. With intravenous dobutamine infusion, heart rate (77-103 beats/min), systolic blood pressure (119-144 mmHg), peak mitral regurgitant jet velocity (4.5-5.4 m/sec), intensity of mitral regurgitant murmur (to 201% of that before infusion in early systole) increased, while left ventricular end-diastolic volume (124-102 mm), left ventricular end-systolic volume (57-42 mm), mitral anular diameter (33-28 mm), and color Doppler mitral regurgitant signal area (704-416 mm(2)) decreased (P < 0.05). Total (forward + backward) left ventricular stroke volume (66-61 mL/beat) showed no change. Dobutamine decreased mitral regurgitant flow/beat, regardless of etiology of mitral regurgitation, which was probably due to the decrease of left ventricular size and mitral annular diameter. Although total (forward + backward) left ventricular stroke volume was unchanged, dobutamine effectively increased forward left ventricular stroke volume by decreasing backward regurgitation. Mitral regurgitant murmur became louder despite the decrease of mitral regurgation, indicating the uselessness of auscultation in the grading of the severity of mitral regurgitation.

An introduction to transoesophageal echocardiography: I. Basic principles

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review is to introduce the uninitiated to transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE): how it works, and what it can do. Sufficient detail is provided to serve as a reference guide to anaesthetists already using TEE in clinical practice.

SOURCE

A Medline search of English language literature up to and including August 1995 was conducted using the key words echocardiography and TEE. Reference echocardiography textbooks were also utilized in the preparation of this review.

PRINCIPLE FINDINGS

All information available from TEE is derived from either cardiac imaging or analysis of blood flow velocity using various Doppler modes. To understand the diagnostic capabilities of TEE we review clinically useful views of the heart as well as modes of cardiac imaging. Sufficient basic physics is presented to allow proper use of adjustment features on the echocardiography machine so that cardiac imaging can be optimized. Available Doppler modes are explained along with an overview of their clinical applications. Figures illustrating clinically useful views obtainable with omniplane TEE are included along with colour prints demonstrating clinical applications of colour flow Doppler.

CONCLUSION

TEE is becoming increasingly important in the management of cardiac patients for cardiac and non-cardiac surgery. An understanding of the capabilities of the technology as well as the underlying physics allows the anaesthetist to glean the most information from this valuable technique, both quantitatively and qualitatively.

Quantification of mitral regurgitation by the proximal convergence method using transesophageal echocardiography. Clinical validation of a geometric correction for proximal flow constraint

BACKGROUND

Proximal flow convergence is a promising method to quantify mitral regurgitation but may overestimate flow when the flow field is constrained. This has not been investigated clinically, nor has a correction factor been validated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eighty-five patients were studied intraoperatively with transesophageal echocardiography and divided into two groups: central convergence (no constraining wall) and eccentric convergence (at least one constraining wall). Regurgitant stroke volume (RSV) and orifice area (ROA) were calculated by ROA = 2 pi r2 Va/Vp and RSV = ROA x VTIcw, where r and va are the radius and velocity of the aliasing contour and vp and VTIcw are the peak and integral of regurgitant velocity. In eccentric convergence patients, convergence angle (alpha) was measured from two-dimensional Doppler color flow maps, and ROA and RSV were corrected by multiplying by alpha/180. For reference, RSV was the difference between thermodilution and pulsed Doppler stroke volumes. In central convergence patients (n = 45), RSV (r = .95, delta = 2.5 +/- 10.8 mL) and ROA (r = .96, delta = 0.02 +/- 0.08 cm2) were accurately calculated, but significant overestimation was noted in the eccentric convergence patients (n = 40, delta RSV = 63.9 +/- 38.0 mL, delta ROA = 0.54 +/- 0.31 cm2), 68% of whom had leaflet prolapse or flail. delta RSV was correlated with alpha (r = -.69, P < .001). After correction by alpha/180, overestimation was largely eliminated (delta RSV = 15.5 +/- 19.3 mL and delta ROA = 0.14 +/- 0.14 cm2) with excellent correlation for the whole group (RSV, r = .91; ROA, r = .95).

CONCLUSIONS

A simple geometric correction factor largely eliminates overestimation caused by flow constraint with the proximal convergence method and should extend the clinical utility of this technique.

Dynamics of mitral regurgitant flow and orifice area. Physiologic application of the proximal flow convergence method: clinical data and experimental testing

BACKGROUND

The proximal flow convergence method, a quantitative color Doppler flow technique, has been validated recently for calculating regurgitant flow and orifice area. We investigated the potential of the method as a tool to study different pathophysiological mechanisms of mitral valve incompetence by assessing the time course of regurgitant flow and orifice area and analyzed the implications for quantification of mitral regurgitation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty-six consecutive patients with mitral regurgitation of different etiologies were studied. The instantaneous regurgitant flow rate Q(t) was computed from color M-mode recordings of the proximal flow convergence region and divided by the corresponding orifice velocity V(t) to obtain the instantaneous orifice area A(t). Regurgitant stroke volume (RSV) was obtained by integrating Q(t). Mean regurgitant flow rate Qm was calculated by RSV divided by regurgitation time. Peak-to-mean regurgitant flow rates Qp/Qm and orifice areas Ap/Am were calculated to assess the phasic character of Q(t) and A(t). In the first 24 patients (group 1), computation of Qm and RSV from the color Doppler recordings was compared with the conventional pulsed Doppler method (r = .94, SEE = 29.4 mL/s and r = .95, SEE = 9.7 mL) as well as with angiography (rs = .93 and rs = .94, P < .001). The temporal variation of Q(t) and A(t) was studied in the next 32 patients (group 2): In functional regurgitation in dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 12), there was a constant decrease in A(t) throughout systole with an increase during left ventricular relaxation; Ap/Am was 5.49 +/- 3.17. In mitral valve prolapse (n = 6), A(t) was small in early systole, increasing substantially in midsystole, and decreasing mildly during left ventricular relaxation; Ap/Am was 2.48 +/- 0.26. In rheumatic mitral regurgitation (n = 14), a roughly constant regurgitant orifice area during most of systole was found in 4 patients. In the other patients there was significant variation of A (t) and the time of its maximum; Ap/Am was 1.81 +/- 0.56. ANOVA demonstrated that the differences in Ap/Am were related to the etiology of mitral regurgitation (P < .0001). To verify that the calculated variation in regurgitant orifice area during the cardiac cycle reflects an actual variation, the ability of the method to predict a constant orifice area throughout systole was tested experimentally in a canine model of mitral regurgitation. Five flow stages were produced by implanting fixed grommet orifices of different sizes into the anterior mitral leaflet. A constant regurgitant orifice area was correctly predicted throughout systole with a mean percent error of -1.8 +/- 4% (from -6.9% to +5.8%); the standard deviation of the individual curves calculated at 10% intervals during systole averaged 13.3% (from 3.6% to 19.6%). In addition, functional mitral regurgitation caused by ventricular dysfunction was produced pharmacologically in five dogs, and the color M-mode recordings of the proximal flow convergence region were obtained with the transducer placed directly on the heart instead of the chest, thus ruling out a significant effect of translational motion on the observed flow pattern. The pattern of regurgitant flow variation was identical to that observed in patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The proximal flow convergence method demonstrates that regurgitant flow and orifice area vary throughout systole in distinct patterns characteristic of the underlying mechanism of mitral incompetence. Therefore, in addition to the potential of the method as a tool to quantify mitral regurgitation, it allows analysis of the pathophysiology of regurgitation in the individual patient, which may be helpful in clinical decision making. Calculating mitral regurgitant flow rate and volume from the time-varying proximal flow field (ie, without assuming a constant orifice area that would produce overestimation in individual patients) provides excellent agreement with independent te

Noninvasive estimation of regurgitant flow rate and volume in patients with mitral regurgitation by Doppler color mapping of accelerating flow field

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to examine the accuracy of proximal accelerating flow calculations in estimating regurgitant flow rate or volume in patients with different types of mitral valve disease.

BACKGROUND

Flow acceleration proximal to a regurgitant orifice, observed with Doppler color flow mapping, is constituted by isovelocity surfaces centered at the orifice. By conservation of mass, the flow rate through each isovelocity surface equals the flow rate through the regurgitant orifice.

METHODS

Forty-six adults with mitral regurgitation of angiographic grades I to IV were studied. The proximal accelerating flow rate (Q) was calculated by: Q = 2 pi r2.Vn, where pi r2 is the area of the hemisphere and Vn is the Nyquist velocity. Radius of the hemisphere (r) was measured from two-dimensional or M-mode Doppler color recording. From the M-mode color study, integration of accelerating flow rate throughout systole yielded stroke accelerating flow volume and mean flow rate. Mitral regurgitant flow rate and stroke regurgitant volume were measured by using a combination of pulsed wave Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements of aortic forward flow and mitral inflow.

RESULTS

The proximal accelerating flow region was observed in 42 of 46 patients. Maximal accelerating flow measured from either two-dimensional (372 +/- 389 ml/s) or M-mode (406 +/- 421 ml/s) Doppler color study tended to overestimate the mean regurgitant flow rate (306 +/- 253 ml/s, p < 0.05). Mean Doppler accelerating flow rate correlated well with mean regurgitant flow rate (r = 0.95, p < 0.001), although there was a tendency toward slight overestimation of mean regurgitant flow by mean accelerating flow in severe mitral regurgitation. However, there was no significant difference between the mean accelerating flow rate (318 +/- 304 ml/s) and the mean regurgitant flow rate (306 +/- 253 ml/s, p = NS) for all patients. A similar relation was found between accelerating flow stroke volume (78.27 +/- 62.72 ml) and regurgitant flow stroke volume (76.06 +/- 59.76 ml) (r = 0.95, p < 0.001). The etiology of mitral regurgitation did not appear to affect the relation between accelerating flow and regurgitant flow.

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal accelerating flow rate calculated by the hemispheric model of the isovelocity surface was applicable and accurate in most patients with mitral regurgitation of a variety of causes. There was slight overestimation of regurgitant flow rate by accelerating flow rate when the regurgitant lesion was more severe.

Quantification of mitral regurgitation with the proximal flow convergence method: a clinical study

Accurate quantitation of valvular incompetence remains an important goal in clinical cardiology. It has been shown previously that when color flow Doppler mapping is used, simple measurements of apparent jet size do not correlate closely with regurgitant flow rate and regurgitant fraction. Recently the proximal flow convergence method has been proposed to quantify valvular regurgitation by analysis of the converging flow field proximal to a regurgitant lesion. Flow rate Q can be calculated as Q = 2 pi r2v(a), where v(a) is the aliasing velocity at a distance r from the orifice. In 54 patients (43 with sinus rhythm and 11 with atrial fibrillation) who had at least mild mitral regurgitation according to semiquantitative assessment, regurgitant stroke volume, regurgitant flow rate, and regurgitant fraction were calculated with the proximal flow convergence method and compared with values that were obtained by the Doppler two-dimensional echocardiographic method. Regurgitant stroke volumes (Vr) as calculated by the proximal flow convergence method correlated very closely with values that were obtained by the Doppler two-dimensional method, with r = 0.93 (y = 0.95x + 0.55) and delta Vr = -0.3 +/- 4.0 cm3. Regurgitant flow rates (Q) as calculated by both methods showed a similar correlation: r = 0.93 (y = 0.95x + 54) and delta Q = -34 +/- 284 cm3/min. The correlation for regurgitant fraction (RF) as calculated by both techniques showed r = 0.89 (y = 0.98x + 0.006) and delta RF = -0.005 +/- 0.06. All correlations were slightly better for the group of patients with sinus rhythm than for the study group of patients with atrial fibrillation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Simultaneous measurement of left atrial pressure by Doppler echocardiography and catheterization

Simultaneous, continuous wave Doppler echocardiography, left ventricular systolic and mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure measurements were performed during cardiac catheterization in 54 patients with mitral regurgitation. Doppler-derived left atrial pressure, which was calculated by subtracting mitral regurgitant gradient from brachial artery systolic pressure, correlated well with mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure by catheter (r = 0.933, SEE = 2.9 mmHg, P < 0.001); a comparison between non-invasive and invasive systolic gradients across the mitral valve yielded a high correlation (r = 0.91, SEE = 6.0 mmHg, P < 0.001); and there was also a high correlation between brachial artery and left ventricular systolic pressures (r = 0.93, SEE = 4.9 mmHg, P < 0.01). It is concluded that Doppler echocardiography provides a reliable and accurate method for complete non-invasive assessment of left atrial pressure in patients with mitral regurgitation.

Cross-sectional early mitral flow-velocity profiles from color Doppler in patients with mitral valve disease

BACKGROUND

Cross-sectional flow-velocity profiles from early mitral flow in 20 patients (10 with mitral regurgitation and 10 with mitral stenosis) were constructed from the velocity data from each point in sequentially delayed two-dimensional digital Doppler ultrasound maps.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The data suggested that the early mitral flow studied in an apical four-chamber view was variably skewed in both patient groups. The maximum flow velocity overestimated the cross-sectional mean velocity at the same time by a factor of 1.12-1.86. The maximum time-velocity integral was 1.13-1.77-fold greater than the cross-sectional mean time-velocity integral. In patients with mitral regurgitation, the cross-sectional flow-velocity profile appeared to be most skewed at the level of the mitral leaflet tips. The level of the mitral annulus appeared to give the most homogenous flow-velocity distribution in both patient groups.

CONCLUSIONS

When calculations of volume flow are based on pulsed Doppler ultrasound recordings with a single sample volume, the possibility of a skewed flow-velocity profile must be taken into account.

Non-invasive measurement of the regurgitant fraction by pulsed Doppler echocardiography in isolated pure mitral regurgitation

OBJECTIVE

To assess the usefulness of pulsed Doppler echocardiography as a method of measuring the regurgitant fraction in patients with mitral regurgitation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty controls and 27 patients with isolated mitral regurgitation underwent Doppler studies. In the patients the study was performed within 48 hours of cardiac catheterisation. Aortic outflow was measured in the centre of the aortic annulus, and mitral inflow was derived from the flow velocity at the tip of the leaflets and the area of the elliptical mitral opening. The regurgitant fraction was calculated as the difference between the two flows divided by the mtiral inflow.

RESULTS

In the 20 controls the two flows were almost identical (mitral inflow, 4.44 (SD 0.88) l/min; aortic outflow, 4.58 (SD 0.84) l/min), with a mean regurgitant fraction of 4.2 (SD 8.4)%. In patients with mitral regurgitation, the mitral inflow was significantly higher than the aortic outflow (8.8 (3.6) v 4.3 (1.1) l/min). In most patients the Doppler-derived regurgitant fraction (45.8 (19.2)%) accorded closely with the regurgitant fraction (41.3 (SD 17.8)%) determined by the haemodynamic technique.

CONCLUSION

Pulsed Doppler echocardiography, with an instantaneous velocity-valve area method for calculating mitral inflow, reliably measured the severity of regurgitation in patients with mitral regurgitation.

Impact of impinging wall jet on color Doppler quantification of mitral regurgitation

BACKGROUND

In clinical color Doppler examinations, mitral regurgitant jets are often observed to impinge on the left atrial wall immediately beyond the mitral valve. In accordance with fluid dynamics theory, we hypothesized that a jet impinging on a wall would lose momentum more rapidly, undergo spatial distortion, and thus have a different observed jet area from that of a free jet with an identical flow rate.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To test this hypothesis in vivo, we studied 44 patients with mitral regurgitation--30 with centrally directed free jets and 14 with eccentrically directed impinging wall jets. Maximal color jet areas (cm2) (with and without correction for left atrial size) were correlated with mitral regurgitant volumes, flow rates, and fractions derived from pulsed Doppler mitral and aortic forward flows. The groups were compared by analysis of covariance. Mean +/- SD mitral regurgitant fraction, regurgitant volume, and mean flow rate averaged 37 +/- 17%, 3.06 +/- 2.65 l/min, and 147 +/- 118 ml/sec, respectively. The maximal jet area from color Doppler imaging correlated relatively well with the mitral regurgitant fraction in the patients with free mitral regurgitant jets (r = 0.74, p less than 0.0001) but poorly in the patients with impinging wall jets (r = 0.42, p = NS). Although the mitral regurgitant fraction was larger (p less than 0.05) in patients with wall jets (44 +/- 20%) than in those with free jets (33 +/- 15%), the maximal jet area was significantly smaller (4.78 +/- 2.87 cm2 for wall jets versus 9.17 +/- 6.45 cm2 for free jets, p less than 0.01). For the same regurgitant fraction, wall jets were only approximately 40% of the size of a corresponding free jet, a difference confirmed by analysis of covariance (p less than 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with mitral regurgitation frequently have jets that impinge on the left atrial wall close to the mitral valve. Such impinging wall jets are less predictable and usually have much smaller color Doppler areas in conventional echocardiographic views than do free jets of similar regurgitant severity. Jet morphology should be considered in the semiquantitative interpretation of mitral regurgitation by Doppler color flow mapping. Future studies of the three-dimensional morphology of wall jets may aid in their assessment.

Noninvasive evaluation of the magnitude of aortic and mitral regurgitation by means of Doppler two-dimensional echocardiography

Using transmitral flow velocity and left ventricular ejection flow velocity, we measured left ventricular inflow volume (LVIV) and left ventricular outflow volume (LVOV) by pulsed Doppler echocardiography in 73 patients who had mitral valve regurgitation (MR), aortic valve regurgitation (AR), or no valvular regurgitation. Doppler-determined regurgitant volume (DOPRV), Doppler-determined regurgitant fraction (DOPRF), total stoke volume, and forward stroke volume were calculated to compare the severity assessed by angiographic scoring and the regurgitant fraction determined by radionuclide angiography (RIRF). In 17 patients with MR, LVIV (84.4 +/- 20.4 ml) was significantly greater (p less than 0.01) than LVOV (52.5 +/- 15.7 ml). LVOV, which is equivalent to forward stroke volume, was lower in patients with MR (52.2 +/- 15.7 ml) than in normal subjects (67.0 +/- 15.7 ml). In 15 patients with AR, LVOV (121.7 +/- 61.1 ml) was significantly greater (p less than 0.01) than LVIV (75.1 +/- 28.1 ml) and LVOV, which is equivalent to total stroke volume, was greater in patients with AR (121.7 +/- 61.1 ml) than in normal subjects (64.0 +/- 14.4 ml). DOPRF correlated with RIRF (r = 0.79, p less than 0.01, n = 11). DOPRV (mild: 10.5 +/- 8.5 ml; moderate: 28.8 +/- 13.6 ml; severe: 74.5 +/- 36.7 ml) and DOPRF (mild: 13.7% +/- 11.5%; moderate: 33.1% +/- 14.2%; severe: 52.6% +/- 15.3%) increased markedly with the severity of regurgitation as assessed by cineangiography. In AR, total stroke volume influenced both forward stroke volume and regurgitant volume, and in MR, regurgitant volume influenced both total stroke volume and forward stroke volume. Total stroke volume in AR and regurgitant volume in MR may play a key role in valvular regurgitation.

Independent pulsed Doppler mapping techniques. Limitations in the prediction of the angiographic severity of mitral regurgitation

Pulsed Doppler mapping of the flow disturbance of mitral insufficiency is commonly employed to estimate the severity of regurgitation. We re-examined the customary pulsed Doppler criterion of relative depth of jet penetration (MR ratio) in 50 patients undergoing left ventriculography and found a modest correlation (r = 0.70) between Doppler and angiographic estimates of regurgitant grade. The MR ratio did not provide statistically significant separation between adjacent angiographic grades 1+ to 3+ (scale 0 to 4+). However, when the data were re-analyzed for the subset of 36 patients with pure mitral regurgitation the correlation between Doppler and angiographic estimates of regurgitant grade improved dramatically (r = 0.88) and MR ratio provided statistically significant separation between all angiographic grades with the sole exception of the distinction between 1+ and 2+ regurgitation. The presence of restriction of the regurgitant orifice in the remaining 14 patients with relative mitral inflow obstruction may result in a nozzle effect on the regurgitant jet which alters the relationship between depth of jet penetration and severity of regurgitation. In this latter group of patients independent pulsed Doppler mapping techniques may provide inaccurate estimates of the angiographic severity of mitral regurgitation.

Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of congenital cardiac disease. An introduction

M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiography have greatly enhanced the evaluation of animals with congenital cardiac disease. Structural abnormalities can be seen and hemodynamic alterations inferred, e.g., ventricular wall concentric hypertrophy indicating pressure overload to the respective ventricle. Interrogation of the diseased heart by Doppler echocardiography allows acquisition of more direct hemodynamic information without cardiac catheterization, which enables the clinician to give a more precise description of a congenital abnormality. The purpose of this study is to illustrate and describe abnormal blood-flow patterns in selected congenital cardiac defects in animals. Basic background information concerning Doppler echocardiographic principles, flow patterns, and calculations will be briefly discussed. For more detailed descriptions other references should be sought. Interpretation of Doppler echocardiography in animals is based primarily on data derived from human studies since studies involving measurable numbers of veterinary patients have not yet been completed.

[Doppler echocardiography quantification of the regurgitant blood volume in patients with mitral valve insufficiency]

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of pulsed Doppler echocardiography in determining the regurgitant fraction in patients with pure mitral regurgitation. In 30 unselected consecutive patients with mitral regurgitation and in 20 patients without valvular heart disease pulsed Doppler echocardiography was performed to measure blood flow at the mitral and aortic valve. The regurgitant blood volume was calculated as the difference of the stroke volumes measured at the mitral and aortic valve. The regurgitant fraction was computed as regurgitant blood volume/mitral flow. By cardiac catheterization regurgitant blood volume and regurgitant fraction were obtained from the left ventricular angiographic stroke volume and the stroke volume measured by thermodilution. Five patients were excluded because of technically poor left ventricular angiograms. In 4 patients with mitral regurgitation measurement of the regurgitant blood volume and regurgitant fraction was impossible by Doppler because of poor ultrasound signal quality. In 21 patients with mitral regurgitation the correlations between the invasive and the Doppler measurements were significant (regurgitant blood volume: r = 0.89, SEE = 20.9 ml; regurgitant fraction: r = 0.91, SEE = 7.1%). However, the mean percent error of the regurgitant fraction measurement (12.0 +/- 11.6%) was smaller than of the regurgitant blood volume measurement (24.9 +/- 17.0%). In the control group the regurgitant blood volume ranged between -25.1 ml and 11.6 ml and the regurgitant fraction between -17.7% and 12.4%. Thus, pulsed Doppler echocardiography is clinically useful in determination of the regurgitant fraction in 84% of unselected adult patients with pure mitral regurgitation. The Doppler method is limited in the diagnosis and quantification of mild regurgitation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Quantification of mitral regurgitation with amplitude-weighted mean velocity from continuous wave Doppler spectra

Amplitude-weighted mean velocity from continuous wave (CW) Doppler spectra was used to measure aortic flow (QAo) and left ventricular mitral inflow (QLVin). These flows were used to quantify mitral regurgitation fraction: RFm = (QLVin-QAo).QLVin-1.100(%).QLVin was calculated from the diastolic time integral of amplitude-weighted mean velocity that was derived from CW spectra with the transducer placed in the apical window and the CW beam directed toward the left ventricular inflow tract. QAo was obtained from the systolic time integral of amplitude-weighted mean velocity by using the same apical window and directing the CW beam toward the left ventricular outflow tract. In 20 normal subjects, RFm ranged between -6.2% and +8% (mean, -0.8%). In 25 patients with pure mitral regurgitation, RFm obtained by Doppler (y) was compared with RFm calculated from biplane left ventriculography and the Fick method (x). The correlation was r = 0.96, SEE = 6.1% of the mean or 12% of the angio-Fick mean; the regression line was y = 0.96x + 0.18; mean y = 49%, mean x = 51%. It is concluded that RFm can be determined accurately by using amplitude-weight mean velocities from CW Doppler spectra. The advantages of this method are its independence from the measurement of the left ventricular inflow or outflow tract area.

Clinical evaluation versus Doppler echocardiography in the quantitative assessment of valvular heart disease

We tested the hypotheses that Doppler echocardiography has a higher accuracy than clinical evaluation in the detection of significant aortic and mitral valvular heart disease and that Doppler echocardiography is highly accurate as compared with cardiac catheterization for the assessment of valvular disease severity. Thus, cardiac catheterization for the assessment of valve lesion severity may be unnecessary in selected patients. We prospectively evaluated 75 consecutive patients, ages 20-74 years (mean, 52 years), with clinically suspected valvular heart disease. Specific clinical and Doppler echocardiographic criteria were used to categorize each valve lesion as absent, insignificant, or significant. Criteria for a significant lesion at cardiac catheterization was an aortic or mitral valve area less than 1.1 or 1.5 cm2, respectively, or equal to or greater than 3+ cm2 aortic or mitral regurgitation at angiography. In all valve lesions, Doppler echocardiography had a higher overall accuracy than clinical evaluation. Increases in accuracies of 28%, 19%, 15%, and 7% occurred for mitral stenosis, aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, and mitral regurgitation, respectively, resulting in overall accuracies of 97%, 100%, 95%, and 96%. Clinical evaluation alone made 28 errors (37% of patients and 19% of valve lesions assessed), and 17 of these errors (23% of patients and 12% of valve lesions) would have resulted in inappropriate management. In only four (24%) of these 17 patients, the attending cardiologist would not have proceeded to assess the valve at cardiac catheterization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Doppler echocardiographic measurement of mitral flow volume: validation of a new method in adult patients

Instantaneous intracardiac flow volumes can be calculated as the product of instantaneous flow velocity and instantaneous orifice area. This was accounted for in a new method of measuring stroke volume and cardiac output in the mitral orifice by pulsed Doppler echocardiography. This method was compared with simultaneous thermodilution in 30 adult patients in sinus rhythm without substantial atrioventricular or pulmonary valve abnormalities. The mitral orifice was assimilated to a conduit with 1) an ellipse-shaped inlet and outlet, 2) the same (and constant) long axis for the inlet and outlet ellipses (that is, the mediolateral anulus diameter measured on apical four chamber views), and 3) a varying outlet short axis (that is, the mitral anteroposterior leaflet separation derived from left parasternal M-mode recordings). This method design avoided the need for a short-axis view of the whole circumference of the mitral outlet orifice, which is difficult to obtain in many adult patients. The mitral flow velocity was recorded from the apex under two-dimensional guidance, within the mitral canal, close to the outlet section. Integration of instantaneous mitral leaflet separation multiplied by instantaneous flow velocity was performed using Simpson's rule. In addition to the proposed "instantaneous orifice area" method (method A), a "mean orifice area" method (method B) was also compared with thermodilution. In this simplified method, mitral flow was the product of mean orifice area and the diastolic mitral velocity integral, both derived from the same recordings as for method A.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Echocardiographic decision-making for replacement surgery in mitral valve prolapse

The clinical usefulness of M-mode echocardiography for predicting severe mitral regurgitation (MR) requiring valve replacement was assessed in 16 men and 10 women with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) as sole primary cardiac disorder. From left ventricular (LV) angiography, MR was classified as none to moderate (8 cases, group A) or severe (18 cases, group B). At echocardiography, increased LV end-diastolic and end-systolic and left atrial (LA) dimensions, corrected for body-surface area, distinguished group B from group A, with the best validities for LA and LV end-diastolic values. The mean echocardiographic LV fractional shortening and ejection fraction (EF) and the angiographic EF were similar in both groups. Echocardiographic and angiocardiographic LV EF correlated poorly, the former usually overestimating the latter. LV end-diastolic and mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressures were highest in group B, and the latter correlated with echocardiographic LA size. Mitral valve replacement was subsequently performed on 15 of the 18 group B patients. M-mode echocardiography is a valuable adjuvant to clinical assessment of MVP for predicting MR severity and for time-planning of cardiac catheterization or mitral valve surgery.