Measurement of aortic regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography

Hepcidin is linked to hypoferremia in patients with rheumatic valve disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Hepcidin has been shown to be an acute phase reactant, induced by infection and inflammation. Ongoing inflammation was shown in rheumatic valve disease (RVD). In this study we want to investigate whether there is a relationship between inflammation and impaired iron metabolism and the role of hepcidin on serum iron levels.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fourty-six patients with RVD and 34 healthy individuals were included in the study. Serum hepcidin, high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), hemoglobin, hematocrit, iron, iron-binding capacity, ferritin levels were measured. Serum hepcidin levels were significantly increased in patients with RVD than in control group (316 ± 121 ng/mL vs 435 ± 126 ng/mL; P < .001). Serum hs-CRP levels were no significantly higher in the patient group in than in the control group (3.9 ± 3.6 mg/L vs 3.5 ± 3.7 mg/L; P = .521).

CONCLUSION

Hepcidin levels are decreased independently from hs-CRP levels as a compensatory mechanism to increase the iron absorption in response to decreased serum iron levels in patients with RVD.

Quantitative Doppler-Echocardiographic Determination of Regurgitant Volume in Patients with Aortic Insufficiency

Background:

The severity of aortic regurgitation (AR) can be determined by invasive or echocardiographic methods. We systematically compared quantitative invasive and echocardiographic data with semiquantitative invasive grades in a prospective series of patients.

Methods:

Using Doppler-echocardiography we determined the cardiac output over the aortic, pulmonary and mitral valve in 27 patients (20 with, 7 without AR). Aortic regurgitant volume was calculated as the difference between the cardiac output over aortic and pulmonary valve/ mitral valve. During angiography the severity of AR was assessed semiquantitatively by aortography and the regurgitant volume was calculated invasively as the difference between the left- and right ventricular cardiac output.

Results:

The echocardiographically and invasively determined regurgitant blood volume correlated closely (R≈0.8). The regurgitant volume increased with higher angiographic grade but there was significant overlap between adjoining qualitative grades.

Conclusion:

In patients with AR, quantitative echocardiographic and angiographic measurements of the regurgitant volume correlate closely.

Echocardiographic follow-up of congenital aortic valvular stenosis

We investigated the morphology of the stenotic aortic valve, the progression of the stenosis, and the onset and progression of aortic regurgitation (AR) in patients with congenital aortic valvular stenosis (AVS). The medical records of 278 patients with AVS were reviewed, with the patients with concomitant lesions besides AR excluded. Very mild aortic stenosis was defined as a transvalvular Doppler peak systolic instantaneous gradient (PSIG) less than 25 mmHg, mild stenosis as 25-49 mmHg, moderate stenosis as 50-75 mmHg, and severe stenosis as more than 75 mmHg. The mean age of the patients was 4.9 +/- 4.3 years (range, 3 days to 15 years), and 203 (73%) were male. The number of the cusps was determined with two-dimensional echocardiography in 266 patients (95%): unicuspid in 3 patients (1%), bicuspid in 127 patients (48%), and tricuspid in 136 patients (51%). A total of 192 of all patients were followed for 2 months to 14.6 years (mean 4.2 +/- 3.3 years) with medical treatment alone. Among 72 patients with very mild stenosis at initial echocardiographic examination, 20% had mild, 3% moderate, and 1% severe stenosis after a mean period of 3.7 years. In 70 patients with mild stenosis at initial echocardiographic examination, 28% had moderate and 9% severe stenosis after a mean period of 5 years. Among 44 patients with moderate stenosis at initial echocardiographic examination, 36% had severe stenosis after a mean period of 3.7 years. Among 192 patients, 40% had AR (3% trivial, 28% mild, and 9% moderate) at initial echocardiographic examination. After a mean period of 4.2 years, 58% of the patients had AR (13 % trivial, 25% mild, 16% moderate, and 4% severe). There was not statistically significant difference between catheterization peak systolic gradients (47 +/- 16 mmHg) and Doppler estimated mean gradients (45 +/- 9 mmHg) (p = 0.53), whereas Doppler PSIGs (74.9 +/- 15.7 mmHg) were higher than catheterization peak systolic gradients (p < 0.0001) in 25 patients who were studied in the catheterization lab. Patients with very mild stenosis may be followed with a noninvasive approach every 1 or 2 years, and an annual follow-up is suggested for patients with mild stenosis. Nearly one-third of patients with moderate stenosis at initial echocardiographic examination had severe stenosis after a mean period of 3.7 years. Therefore, we recommend, that patients with moderate stenosis undergo noninvasive evaluation every 6 months. Doppler estimated mean gradient is very useful in predicting the need for intervention in children with AVS.

Echocardiographic follow-up of children with isolated discrete subaortic stenosis

This study evaluates the progression of stenosis, onset and progression of aortic regurgitation (AR), and the results of surgical outcomes in children with isolated discrete subaortic stenosis (SAS). The medical records of 108 patients (mean age, 5.5 +/- 3.8 years; range, 3 days to 18 years) with isolated discrete SAS were reviewed. Patients with lesions other than AR were excluded. Very mild stenosis was defined as Doppler peak systolic instantaneous gradient (PSIG) less than 25 mmHg, mild stenosis as 25-49 mmHg, moderate stenosis as 50-75 mmHg, and severe stenosis as more than 75 mmHg. Seventy-eight of 108 patients were followed for 2 months to 14 years (mean, 4.8 +/- 3.7 years; median, 5 years) with medical treatment alone. In these patients, the mean PSIG at last echocardiogram was higher than the mean PSIG at initial echocardiogram (39 +/- 19 vs 31 +/- 12 mmHg, respectively; p < 0.001). Among 24 patients with very mild stenosis at initial echocardiogram, 10 had mild and 2 had moderate stenosis after a mean period of 5.6 years. Among 46 patients with mild stenosis at initial echocardiogram, 11 had moderate and 5 had severe stenosis after a mean period of 4.1 years. Only 1 patient among the 8 patients with moderate stenosis at initial echocardiogram had severe stenosis after a mean period of 2.7 years. Thirty-nine patients (50%) had AR (13% trivial, 33% mild, and 4% moderate) at initial echocardiogram. After a mean period of 4.8 years, 77% of the patients had AR (10% trivial, 53% mild, 9% mild-moderate, and 5% moderate). Twenty-four patients underwent surgery. Preoperatively, mean Doppler PSIG and AR incidence were 64 +/- 17 mmHg and 91% (22/24), respectively. The mean Doppler PSIG was 30 +/- 19 mmHg and AR was present in all of the patients a mean period of 4.1 years after surgery. Two patients underwent reoperation for recurrent SAS and AR. Patients with very mild or mild stenosis may be followed noninvasively every year. One patient of the 8 patients with moderate stenosis progressed to severe stenosis, and moderate AR developed in 2 patients after a mean of 2.7 years. We recommend that patients with moderate stenosis undergo careful evaluation to determine whether surgery is necessary due to the severity of stenosis and AR.

Echocardiographic follow-up of children with supravalvular aortic stenosis

This study evaluates the course of supravalvular aortic stenosis (SVAS)-associated right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) obstruction and the results of surgery in children. We reviewed the medical records of 24 patients diagnosed with SVAS at initial echocardiographic examination or during the following period of RVOT obstruction. Very mild SVAS was defined as a transvalvular Doppler peak systolic instantanous gradient (PSIG) less than 25 mmHg, mild stenosis as 25-49 mmHg, moderate stenosis as 50-75 mmHg, and severe stenosis as more than 75 mmHg. The mean age of the patients was 3.1 +/- 2.9 years (range, 7 days to 12.7 years), and 18 of the patients (72%) were male. Fifteen patients had Williams' syndrome. Seventeen patients (71%) were followed for a mean of 5.2 +/- 3.8 years (range, 7 months to 13.5 years). Among 17 patients with complete follow-up records, 1 (6%) had very mild, 5 (29%) mild, 3 (18%) moderate, and 3 (18%) severe aortic stenosis at initial echocardiographic examination. In a newborn patient with mild pulmonary valvular stenosis. SVAS became evident after 2 months and progressed rapidly. Supravalvular aortic stenosis was very mild in 4 patients (23%), mild in 3 (18%), moderate in 3 (18%), and severe in 7 (41%) at last echocardiographic examination. Of 17 patients who were followed, 11 (65%) had RVOT obstruction at initial echocardiographic examination. RVOT obstruction disappeared in 5 patients, regressed in 1 patient, and appeared in 1 patient over the follow-up period. Four patients underwent operation. It appears reasonable that patients with very mild and mild stenosis should be followed medically every 1 or 2 years and patients with moderate stenosis once a year. Newborns with SVAS should be followed for rapid progression of SVAS. In some patients, RVOT obstruction may disappear, and SVAS may develop in others with RVOT obstruction. Patients with RVOT obstruction (at the valvular, supravalvular, or peripheral pulmonary arterial level) should be evaluated carefully for development of SVAS at follow-up.

Assessment of ventricular filling volumes with an automated color Doppler method: validation in a pulsatile flow model

OBJECTIVE

Determination of ventricular filling volumes with the use of Doppler echocardiographic measurements critically depends on the presence of a circular-shaped flow area and a flat velocity profile across it because evaluation of flow volume is usually based on echocardiographic measurements of its diameter and pulsed Doppler recordings within the center of this area. The approach may be limited at the mitral and tricuspid ring levels as a result of their noncircular shape and because nonflat velocity profiles are present. The purpose of this study was to examine in a pulsatile flow model simulating ventricular inflow conditions the accuracy of an automated method based on the analysis of color Doppler flow velocities for evaluation of flow volumes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A recently-developed automated Doppler method that takes into account the velocity distribution across a region of interest was examined in a pulsatile flow model by using flows with waveforms characteristic for ventricular inflow through tubes with elliptically-shaped cross-sectional areas. Color Doppler imaging was performed against flow direction along the major and minor axes of the tubes with major diameters ranging between 3 and 5 cm and major-to-minor diameter ratios of 1.5 and 2.0.

RESULTS

A close correlation was found between flow volumes measured by the Doppler technique for registrations along the minor or major axis of the ellipses and actual values (r = 0.99, standard error of the estimate = 0.44 to 1.98 mL), with a systematic underestimation or overestimation, respectively, depending on the diameter ratio. Averaging of the data derived from 2 orthogonal measurements by using the geometric mean value yielded an excellent agreement between Doppler data and actual flow volumes.

CONCLUSION

This automated color Doppler method enables reliable determination of flow volumes in a pulsatile flow model simulating ventricular inflow conditions with the use of 2 orthogonal imaging views. The data indicate that the method may improve the noninvasive evaluation of ventricular filling volumes.

Aortic Insufficiency

Echocardiography is a reliable and reproducible method for evaluation of aortic insufficiency (AI). AI has a variety of etiologies, including congenital or acquired, and may present as an acute situation or as a chronic condition. Regardless of the clinical presentation, patient symptoms and physical signs may not be present unless the AI has progressed to a moderate or severe degree. As the severity of AI increases, there are changes in the pathophysiology of the heart, including an increase in left ventricle dimensions and chamber compliance. Echocardiographic methods to evaluate AI include two-dimensional, m-mode, color flow imaging, and pulsed wave and continuous wave Doppler. The combined use of multiple techniques provides more thorough and accurate quantification, both during follow-up of the disease process and after surgical correction.

Aortic regurgitation: quantitative methods by echocardiography

Quantification of aortic regurgitation (AR) is a common and difficult clinical problem. The severity of regurgitation has traditionally been estimated with the use of contrast aortography, which is impractical as a screening tool or for serial examinations. In the past two decades, Doppler echocardiography has emerged as an important tool in the quantification of AR. Pulsed Doppler mapping of the depth of the regurgitant jet into the left ventricle was one of the initial echocardiographic methods used for this purpose. The slope and pressure (or velocity) half-time of continuous-wave Doppler profiles of regurgitant jets are also useful. These Doppler techniques may be used to determine the regurgitant volume or regurgitant fraction in patients with AR. The use of color Doppler to measure the height (or cross-sectional area) of the regurgitant jet relative to the height (cross-sectional area) of the left ventricular outflow tract is both sensitive and specific in the quantification of AR. More recently, the continuity principle has been used to determine the effective aortic regurgitant orifice area, which increases as AR becomes more severe. Although this is a promising tool, calculation of this value is not yet common practice in most echocardiography laboratories. Although no single echocardiographic technique is without limitations, all have some validity, and it is reasonable to use a combination of them to obtain a composite estimate of the severity of AR.

An integrated approach to the quantification of aortic regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Although different Doppler methods have been proposed for the quantification of aortic regurgitation, no study has prospectively compared these methods with each other and their correlation with angiography. The aim of this study was to prospectively analyze the usefulness of different Doppler echocardiography parameters by testing all such parameters in each patient.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients with aortic regurgitation underwent 2-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic studies and catheterization. The following Doppler indexes were analyzed and compared with aortography. Color Doppler: (1) jet color height/left ventricular outflow tract height in parasternal long-axis view, and (2) jet color area/left ventricular outflow tract area in short-axis view. Continuous Doppler: (3) regurgitant flow pressure half-time, (4) regurgitant flow time velocity integral (in centimeters), and (5) regurgitant flow time velocity integral (in centimeters)/diastolic period (in milliseconds). Pulsed Doppler in thoracic and abdominal aorta: (6) time velocity integral of diastolic reverse flow (in centimeters), (7) time velocity integral of systolic anterograde flow/integral of diastolic reverse flow, (8) (time velocity integral of diastolic reverse flow/diastolic period) x 100, and (9) diastolic reverse flow duration/diastolic period (as a percentage). We compared these parameters with severity of regurgitation measured by angiography and classified as mild, moderate, or severe.

RESULTS

The most useful parameters were (1) jet color height/left ventricular outflow tract height (correctly classified 42 of 49 patients), (2) (time velocity integral of diastolic reverse flow/diastolic period) x 100 in the thoracic aorta (correctly classified 41 of 46 patients), and (3) (time velocity integral of diastolic reverse flow/diastolic period) x 100 in the abdominal aorta (correctly classified 42 of 49 patients). Sequential integration of these 3 parameters correctly classified 96% of patients (44 of 46 patients) and was achieved in 90% of cases.

CONCLUSION

An integrated combination of several Doppler parameters can quickly and accurately classify the degree of aortic regurgitation as determined by angiography.

A simplified method for determining regurgitant fraction by Doppler echocardiography in patients with aortic regurgitation

OBJECTIVES

This study attempted to develop and validate a simple method for calculating aortic regurgitant fraction by use of pulsed wave Doppler echocardiography.

BACKGROUND

Although several investigators have been able to determine aortic regurgitant fraction by Doppler echocardiography, the methods used require accurate determination of the cross-sectional areas of intracardiac sites at which the volumetric flow is calculated.

METHODS

Our concept was based on a constant relation that exists between the cross-sectional area of the left ventricular outflow tract and the mitral valve annulus in normal subjects. To verify this, we used Doppler echocardiography to measure the flow velocity integral of the left ventricular outflow tract and the mitral annulus in the apical view in 50 normal subjects (32 men, 18 women, mean age 34 years).

RESULTS

Close correlation (r = 0.95) was observed between the flow velocity integral (FVI) of the outflow tract (OT) and that of the mitral annulus (MA): FVIMA/FVIOT = 0.77. Because mitral flow equals aortic flow in normal subjects, the ratio of the cross-sectional area of the mitral annulus to that of the outflow tract was 1/0.77. In patients with aortic regurgitation, the regurgitant fraction (RF) = (Aortic flow-Mitral flow)/Aortic flow = 1-Mitral flow/Aortic flow. Substituting 0.77 for the area component of flow, RF = 1-(1/0.77).(FVIMA/FVIOT). To evaluate the accuracy of this method, we compared the regurgitant fraction derived by Doppler echocardiography with that from catheterization findings in 20 patients with aortic regurgitation (an isolated lesion was found in 14). The regurgitant fraction by catheterization was the difference between total (angiographic) and forward (thermodilution) stroke volumes as a percent of total flow. Good correlation was observed between catheterization and Doppler regurgitant fraction (r = 0.88, SEE 9%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, regurgitant fraction can be estimated from Doppler echocardiography in patients with aortic regurgitation by a method that requires only measurements of the flow velocity integral from the mitral annulus and left ventricular outflow tract.

Semiquantitation of aortic regurgitation by different Doppler echocardiographic techniques and comparison with ultrafast computed tomography

Fourteen patients with chronic aortic regurgitation were studied by several two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic methods to determine the severity of aortic regurgitation. Semiquantitation of aortic regurgitation was performed by various color-flow imaging measurements, diastolic half-time of the continuous-wave regurgitation jet, and pulsed-wave velocity curve in the descending aorta. These measurements were compared with regurgitant volume and fraction by ultrafast computed tomography. All Doppler methods demonstrated a significant correlation for severity of aortic regurgitation with regurgitant fraction by ultrafast computed tomographic scanning, but scatter was present with each method. The methods with the closest correlation were at the lowest level of obtainable results. In clinical practice, all Doppler methods must be used to determine the severity of aortic regurgitation.

Aortic valve repair for aortic stenosis in adults

The stenotic aortic valve was surgically repaired in 48 adults, 21 women and 27 men, aged 38 to 83 years. Five had congenital aortic stenosis (AS), with a mean aortic valve gradient and area of 58 +/- 23 mm Hg (standard deviation) and 0.54 +/- 0.13 cm2, respectively; 32 had senile AS with a mean aortic valve gradient and area of 43 +/- 20 mm Hg and 0.98 +/- 0.41 cm2; and 11 had rheumatic AS with a mean aortic valve gradient and area of 59 +/- 24 mm Hg and 0.47 +/- 0.15 cm2. Only 6 patients underwent isolated aortic valvoplasty, 11 underwent concomitant mitral valve procedure, and 34 underwent concomitant coronary revascularization. Repair consisted of decalcification in 33 patients and decalcification as well as commissurotomy in 15 patients. There were three hospital deaths, none related to the aortic valve. Only 2 patients (both rheumatic) did not improve clinically. During follow-up (mean, 64 +/- 41 months) aortic valve restenosis developed in 24% (10 patients, 3/5 congenital, 4/11 rheumatic, and 3/32 senile) at a mean of 64 +/- 28 months. Postoperative Doppler echocardiographic assessment of 21 patients with senile AS at 1.1 +/- 2.7 and 18.1 +/- 1.4 months showed significantly lower aortic valve gradient and improved area in comparison with preoperative values. At 36 +/- 2.7 months, aortic valve gradient and area were not significantly different than preoperative values, and at 58.5 +/- 2.6 months aortic valve gradient was 1.41 (p = 0.07) times the preoperative value. At 7 years, actuarial freedom from aortic valve-related symptoms of the patients with senile AS was 87%. We conclude that in select patients aortic valve repair results in excellent relief of AS. Late restenosis is expected and more likely to occur in the valves with congenital and rheumatic disease than in those with senile disease.

Quantification of aortic regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography: a new method evaluated in pigs

We have developed a method to quantify aortic regurgitant orifice and volume, based on measurements of the velocity of the regurgitant jet, aortic systolic flow, the systolic and diastolic arterial pressures, a Windkessel arterial model, and a parameter estimation technique. In six pigs we produced aortic regurgitant flows between 2.1 and 17.8 ml per beat, i.e. regurgitant fractions from 0.06 to 0.58. Pulmonary and aortic flows were measured with electromagnetic flow probes, aortic pressure was measured invasively, and the regurgitant jet velocity was obtained with continuous-wave Doppler. The parameter estimation procedure was based on the Kalman filter principle, resulting primarily in an estimate of the regurgitant orifice area. The area was multiplied by the velocity integral of the regurgitant jet to estimate regurgitant volume. A strong correlation was found between the regurgitant volumes obtained by parameter estimation and the electromagnetic flow measurement. These results from our study in pigs suggest that it may be possible to quantify regurgitant orifice and volume in patients completely noninvasively from Doppler and blood pressure measurements.

Prospective validation of detection and quantitative assessment of chronic aortic regurgitation by a combined echocardiographic and Doppler method

To establish the accuracy of Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of chronic aortic regurgitation (AR), 87 patients were included in a two-step prospective study. In a first consecutive series of 56 patients, two-dimensional directed M-mode echocardiography and pulsed wave Doppler (PWD) studies were performed within a 24-hour interval of a conventional contrast aortic angiography, which showed AR in 46 patients. Sensitivity and specificity of PWD in the detection of AR were both 100%. To quantitate AR, a left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) PWD mapping was scored. Significant differences between 1, 2, and 3 to 4 angiographic grades of AR were obtained. As some overlap existed between groups, a multifactorial analysis of PWD and echocardiographic measurements was performed: optimal discrimination was obtained when a new score combining LVOT mapping by PWD, diastolic left ventricular diameter, and aortic root dimension was considered. A prospective validation of this combined echocardiographic-Doppler method was then applied on a second group of 31 catheterized patients with AR. Correlation obtained (r = 0.86; p less than 0.001) confirmed the accuracy of this new method in the prediction of the severity of AR.

Quantitation of aortic regurgitation by computer analysis of digital subtraction angiography

Digital subtraction angiography provides the potential to determine aortic regurgitant fraction by computer analysis of time-intensity curves generated from regions of interest positioned over the aorta and left ventricle after aortography. To validate this ability, we studied six dogs instrumented with an electromagnetic flow probe on the ascending aorta. Aortic regurgitation of varying severity was produced by a basket catheter introduced through the right carotid artery. Aortograms were performed using continuous fluoroscopy at 30 frames/s and stored in digital format in a 256 x 256 pixel matrix. An image-processing computer was utilized to plot summated pixel intensity versus time for both the aortic and the left ventricular regions of interest. Regurgitant fraction was calculated from the time-intensity curves using an algorithm analogous to that employed by dye-dilution methods. Regurgitant fraction determined from digital angiography was compared with that obtained by electromagnetic flow and was found to correlate well (r = 0.94, SEE = 7.4%) over a wide range of values. Thus, these data indicate that aortic regurgitant fraction can be accurately determined from computer analysis of digitally acquired aortograms in an animal model of acute aortic regurgitation.

Quantification of aortic regurgitation using Doppler imaging

Aortic insufficiency induces the development of a jet within the left ventricular outflow tract. The cross sectional area of this jet at its origin is the major determinant of the severity of the regurgitation. M mode Doppler imaging reportedly allows the measurement of jet diameter. This study was designed to evaluate the quantification of aortic regurgitation using a measurement of the jet diameter by M mode Doppler imaging. The left ventricular outflow tract of 32 patients was imaged using either a multigate pulsed Doppler velocimeter of color flow mapping system (Hewlett Packard). The jet diameter was compared to a 4 grade semiquantification derived from supravalvular aortography. Adequate imaging was obtained in the 32 patients. Four of them had no regurgitation: no diastolic flow image could be found during their Doppler investigation. A clear jet image was obtained in the 28 remaining patients. We found a close relationship between the jet diameter (jd in mm) and the angiographic grade (ag): jd = 2.4 + 6.1 ag, r = 0.88, the most significant differences being found between grade 0 and grade 1, and grade 1 and grade 2. In conclusion, direct M mode measurement of the regurgitant jet of aortic insufficiency at its origin offers an additional approach of the severity of the leak.

Quantitative assessment of the hemodynamic consequences of aortic regurgitation by means of continuous wave Doppler recordings

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of continuous wave Doppler ultrasound recordings to reflect the magnitude and hemodynamic effects of aortic regurgitation. Forty-five patients with angiographically proved aortic regurgitation had Doppler studies performed within 24 hours of cardiac catheterization. High quality spectral recordings of the regurgitant jet were obtained in 31 patients, whereas 14 patients exhibited dropout of high velocity signals precluding measurement of maximal velocities. The slope of the peak to end-diastolic velocity decrease measured by Doppler examination was compared with the decay in the aortic to left ventricular diastolic pressure gradient by catheterization and was found to correlate well (r = 0.86). The Doppler velocity decay slope was generally higher in patients with angiographically severe rather than mild or moderate aortic regurgitation, but considerable overlap was present among groups. However, a diastolic velocity decay slope of greater than 3 m/s2 was seen only in those patients with advanced (3 or 4+) aortic regurgitation. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was estimated from the Doppler recordings by subtracting the end-diastolic pressure gradient obtained by the modified Bernoulli equation from the cuff diastolic blood pressure. A correlation was observed (r = 0.84) between Doppler and catheterization left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in the 31 patients with high quality spectral data, although the SEE was substantial (5.5 mm Hg). These data demonstrate that continuous wave Doppler recordings of the regurgitant jet can be useful in assessing the angiographic severity and hemodynamics of aortic regurgitation.

Magnetic resonance assessment of aortic and mitral regurgitation

Magnetic resonance imaging provides an accurate method for the measurement of left and right ventricular volume. The ratio of left ventricular stroke volume to right ventricular stroke volume was calculated from contiguous transverse magnetic resonance images and was used to measure the severity of regurgitation in 18 patients with aortic regurgitation and 10 with mitral regurgitation. Cardiac anatomy was well demonstrated, allowing an assessment of relative chamber volumes and associated abnormalities, although valve abnormality was not well seen. There was a weak correlation between magnetic resonance measurements of left ventricular end diastolic volume and stroke volume ratio. The stroke volume ratio differed significantly in four groups with increasing angiographic severity of regurgitation, and all but the group with trivial regurgitation differed significantly from normal. There was good correlation between magnetic resonance and radionuclide measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction and stroke volume ratio, although the stroke volume ratio was consistently overestimated by radionuclide ventriculography. Correlation was less good for the right ventricular ejection fraction, which was underestimated by radionuclide ventriculography. It is concluded that magnetic resonance imaging provides valuable information in patients with valvar regurgitation, and serves as a suitable standard by which to judge conventional techniques.