The variable effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition on myocardial ischaemia in chronic stable angina

Antianginal efficacy of omapatrilat in patients with chronic angina pectoris

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition is not an effective antianginal therapy. Experimental data suggest that broader vasopeptidase inhibition may decrease the magnitude of demand-induced myocardial ischemia. A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled parallel study evaluated omapatrilat, an inhibitor of angiotensin-converting enzyme and neutral endopeptidase. The primary objective was to compare maximum duration of exercise at peak plasma concentrations. Exercise treadmill studies were performed in 348 patients who had chronic angina at baseline and after 4 weeks of therapy with 80 mg/day omapatrilat or placebo. Safety data were collected and reported for all patients. Treadmill exercise duration at peak was significantly prolonged in the omapatrilat group compared with the placebo group (76.6 +/- 84.2 vs 28.7 +/- 82.2 seconds difference from baseline, p <0.001). Similar statistically significant increases were seen in time to onset of level III/IV angina and time to onset of >/=0.1-mV ST-segment depression (p <0.001). The significant improvements in exercise duration and measurements of myocardial ischemia were not sustained 20 to 28 hours after dosing. Omapatrilat was generally well tolerated in this predominantly normotensive population. The incidence of serious adverse events was 5.2% in the 2 groups. Thus, omapatrilat, an investigational vasopeptidase inhibitor, is effective in prolonging exercise duration and parameters of demand-induced myocardial ischemia in patients who have chronic angina at peak concentrations. The data confirm the proof of principle that broader vasopeptidase inhibition beyond angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition is required to alleviate symptoms of chronic angina.

Effect of ramipril on postrevascularization prevalence of angina and quality of life

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of angina after invasive revascularization is not negligible and impacts on quality of life. It has not been clarified whether potential anti-ischemic actions of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (1) may apply to non high-risk patients and (2) may reduce the prevalence of angina. We sought to test the hypothesis that ramipril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, may reduce the postrevascularization prevalence of angina pectoris and improve quality of life.

METHODS

In the Angiotensin-converting enzyme Post-Revascularization Study (APRES), 159 patients who underwent invasive revascularization for chronic angina and who had not had heart failure, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), or severe left ventricular dysfunction were randomized to receive 10 mg of ramipril or placebo. During the 12- to 46-month follow-up, the Specific Activity Scale class, exercise tests, and SF-36 quality of life scores were serially assessed.

RESULTS

The average prevalence of angina of Specific Activity Scale class II or worse was 26.6% in the ramipril group and 19.9% in the placebo group (p=0.16). The average prevalence of exercise-inducible ischemia was 30.8% in the ramipril group and 25.2% in the placebo group (p=0.39). There were no significant differences between the two treatment groups in the SF-36 quality of life scores or in the Duke treadmill score. Post-hoc power calculations revealed that the power to rule out a clinical significant benefit of ramipril on the prevalence of angina, quality of life, and Duke treadmill score was >90%.

CONCLUSIONS

These data do not suggest that ramipril reduces the prevalence of angina pectoris or improves quality of life after invasive revascularization in such patients

Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on transient ischemia: the Quinapril Anti-Ischemia and Symptoms of Angina Reduction (QUASAR) trial

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition (ACE-I) (i.e., quinapril) prevents transient ischemia (exertional and spontaneous) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

BACKGROUND

It is known that ACE-I reduces the risk of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and other CAD-related outcomes in high-risk patients. Numerous studies have confirmed that ACE-I improves coronary flow and endothelial function. Whether ACE-I also decreases transient ischemia is unclear, because no studies have been adequately designed or sufficiently powered to evaluate this issue.

METHODS

Using a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter design, we enrolled 336 CAD patients with stable angina. None had uncontrolled hypertension, left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, or recent MI, and all developed electrocardiographic (ECG) evidence of ischemia during exercise. They were randomly assigned to one of two groups: 40 mg/day quinapril (n = 177) or placebo (n = 159) for 8 weeks. Patients then entered an additional eight-week treatment phase to examine the full dose range. Those assigned to 40 mg quinapril continued that dose and those assigned to placebo were titrated to 80 mg/day. Treadmill testing, the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, and ambulatory ECG monitoring were used to assess responses at baseline and at 8 and 16 weeks.

RESULTS

The groups did not differ significantly at entry or in terms of indexes assessing myocardial ischemia at 8 or 16 weeks of treatment. In this low-risk population, ACE-I was not associated with serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest short-term ACE-I in CAD patients without hypertension, LV dysfunction, or acute MI is not associated with significant effects on transient ischemia.

Vasopeptidase inhibition in a canine model of exercise-induced left ventricular dysfunction

1. The present study compared the acute efficacies of vasopeptidase inhibition with omapatrilat, nitroglycerin and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition in exercise-induced myocardial dysfunction. Omapatrilat, a vasopeptidase inhibitor, inhibits both neutral endopeptidase and ACE. Whereas vasopeptidase inhibitors have demonstrated clinical efficacy in hypertension and heart failure, their effects in myocardial ischaemia remain unclear. 2. Omapatrilat (0.3 mg/kg) was compared with vehicle (saline), an ACE inhibitor (fosinoprilat; 0.44 mg/kg) and nitroglycerin (8.0 microg/kg per min), in an established canine model of exercise-induced myocardial dysfunction induced by progressive closure of an ameroid constrictor placed about the proximal circumflex coronary artery. Maximal treadmill exercise tests, terminated when heart rate failed to increase with increasing workload or failure to continue exercise, were performed in chronically instrumented dogs. 3. During exercise, omapatrilat and nitroglycerin similarly increased ischaemic wall thickening (P< or = 0.0001, ANOVA, 12 d.f.), whereas fosinoprilat and vehicle were without effect. Ischaemic zone ST changes were decreased with nitroglycerin (P = 0.0006, ANOVA, 12 d.f.) and tended to decrease with omapatrilat (P = 0.07, ANOVA, 12 d.f.). Peak exercise capacity was increased with nitroglycerin (9.7 +/- 1.1 vs 11.2 +/- 1.0 kcal, control vs 4 h, respectively; n = 6) and omapatrilat (9.7 +/- 0.8 vs 11.4 +/- 0.6 kcal, control vs 4 h, respectively; n = 6) and was unchanged with ACE inhibition (9.0 +/- 1.2 vs 9.5 +/- 1.1 kcal, control vs 4 h, respectively; n = 7). Omapatrilat differentially increased double product during exercise (P = 0.001, ANOVA, 12 d.f.) compared with other treatments. 4. During exercise-induced myocardial dysfunction, acute ACE inhibition did not attenuate ischaemic changes and failed to improve exercise capacity. Increased exercise capacity with omapatrilat was accompanied by a differential increase in double product, consistent with increased oxygen supply and demand. Improvements in ischaemic function were comparable between omapatrilat and nitroglycerin, suggesting that omapatrilat may represent a novel therapy in demand-induced ischaemia.

Anti-ischemic effects of angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibition in hypertension

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether augmentation of bradykinin (BK) bioavailability with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition is associated with reduced exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in hypertension.

BACKGROUND

Bradykinin responses are depressed in hypertension, and endothelial dysfunction contributes to myocardial ischemia by promoting abnormal coronary vasomotion during stress.

METHODS

Fourteen hypertensive (HT) and 17 normotensive (NT), mildly symptomatic patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and ST-segment depression during exercise were studied before and after seven days of oral enalapril (EN), which was titrated from 2.5 to 20 mg daily. Patients underwent two treadmill exercise tests and determination of forearm vasodilator response to BK.

RESULTS

Despite receiving a lower dose of EN (7.8 vs. 14.8 mg, p < 0.001), NT patients had a significant reduction in blood pressure compared to HT patients. Compared to pre-EN, the ischemic threshold, defined as the rate-pressure product at the onset of 1-mm ST depression (p = 0.045), the duration of exercise to 1-mm ST depression (180 +/- 54 s, p = 0.007) and the maximum exercise duration (94 +/- 18 s, p < 0.001) were greater after EN in HT patients, but not in NT subjects (all p > or = 0.3). Patients with a greater drop in blood pressure experienced no improvement in exercise-induced ischemia. Forearm blood flow responses to BK were improved with EN in all patients to a similar extent. Moreover, no correlation was observed between the basal response to BK or the magnitude of its improvement with EN and with either the dose of EN or the improvement in exercise ischemic threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

Exercise-induced myocardial ischemia is ameliorated in HT patients with CAD by ACE inhibition.

Effects of quinapril on clinical outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting (The QUO VADIS Study). QUinapril on Vascular Ace and Determinants of Ischemia

The QUO VADIS study was designed to explore whether 1 year of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with quinapril (40 mg/day) would decrease ischemia in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Patients (n = 149) scheduled for CABG were randomized 4 weeks before surgery. Study medication was used from randomization up to 1 year after CABG. Exercise testing was performed at randomization; the exercise test was repeated 1 year after CABG and patients underwent 48-hour Holter monitoring. Clinical ischemic events were recorded and defined as death, revascularization, myocardial infarction, recurrence of angina pectoris, ischemic stroke, or transient ischemic attack. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Total exercise time increased overall by 75 +/- 76 seconds 1 year after CABG (placebo +79 +/- 75 seconds, quinapril +72 +/- 79 seconds, p = 0.6). All patients had ischemic ST-segment changes at randomization; 33% of patients had ischemic ST-segment changes 1 year after CABG (placebo 29%, quinapril 37%, p = 0.4). On Holter monitoring, the number of patients experiencing > or = 1 episodes of ischemia was equal in both groups. Treatment with quinapril significantly reduced clinical ischemic events after CABG: 15% in patients on placebo versus 4% of patients on quinapril (hazard ratio 0.23, 95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.87, p = 0.02). Long-term quinapril treatment significantly reduced clinical ischemic events within 1 year after CABG, although ischemia at exercise testing and Holter monitoring was unchanged.

Reduction of exercise-induced myocardial ischemia during add-on treatment with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril in patients with normal left ventricular function and optimal beta blockade

OBJECTIVES

We sought to study the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on exercise-induced myocardial ischemia.

BACKGROUND

Although angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been shown to reduce ischemic events after myocardial infarction, few data are available regarding their direct anti-ischemic effects in patients with coronary artery disease.

METHODS

We studied 43 patients (average age 63 +/- 8 years) with exercise-induced myocardial ischemia (> or =0.1 mV ST depression, despite optimal beta blockade) and normal left ventricular function (ejection fraction >0.50). In a double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel design, patients were treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (enalapril 10 mg twice daily) or placebo. Assessments were made after three weeks (short-term) and 12 weeks (long-term).

RESULTS

At baseline, the groups were well matched for all clinical characteristics. After three weeks, there was a slight but not significant increase in time to 0.1 mV ST depression in both groups (p = NS); rate pressure product (RPP = heart rate x systolic blood pressure) was also unaffected. After 12 weeks, however, time to 0.1 mV ST depression further increased in the enalapril group (5.6 +/- 1.9 min) but was unchanged in the placebo group (4.4 +/- 1.3 min; p < 0.05 between groups). In contrast, RPP was not affected. Concentrations of both atrial and brain natriuretic peptides at peak exercise tended to be lower by enalapril, if compared to placebo (p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition may reduce exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in patients with normal left ventricular function. Further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms involved.

The Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibition Post Revascularization Study (APRES)

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to assess the effect of treatment with ramipril on the incidence of cardiac events after invasive revascularization in patients with asymptomatic moderate left ventricular dysfunction.

BACKGROUND

In patients with angina pectoris and left ventricular dysfunction, both invasive revascularization and treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors reduce cardiac mortality and morbidity. Whether there is a benefit from combining the two treatment strategies has never been evaluated prospectively.

METHODS

After invasive revascularization, 159 patients with preoperative chronic stable angina pectoris, left ventricular ejection fraction between 0.30 and 0.50 and no clinical heart failure were randomly assigned to receive double-blind treatment with either ramipril or placebo and subsequently followed for a median of 33 months.

RESULTS

Ramipril reduced the incidence of the triple-composite end point of cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction or clinical heart failure (risk reduction 58%; 95% confidence interval 7% to 80%, p = 0.031). The incidence of the quadruple-composite end point of cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, clinical heart failure or recurrent angina pectoris was not altered with ramipril. These findings were consistent across subgroups with respect to left ventricular ejection fraction below or above 0.40, and whether coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was performed.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with angina pectoris and asymptomatic moderate left ventricular dysfunction, long-term treatment with ramipril after invasive revascularization significantly reduced the incidence of the composite end point of cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction or clinical heart failure, indicating that the beneficial effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor treatment may be extended to include treatment of this patient group.

Acute anti-ischemic effects of perindoprilat in men with coronary artery disease and their relation with left ventricular function

Long-term angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition may reduce ischemic events in patients with coronary artery disease, but whether it protects against acute ischemia or the effects of preexisting left ventricular (LV) dysfunction on potential anti-ischemic properties is unknown. We performed a double-blind trial in 25 patients with exercise-induced ischemia. The effects of perindoprilat on pacing-induced myocardial ischemia were examined. Fourteen patients received perindoprilat and 11 patients received placebo. Based on LV function, 2 subgroups were formed in the perindoprilat group: 7 patients with LV dysfunction (LV ejection fraction <0.40), and 7 patients with normal LV function. After receiving the study medication, the pacing test was repeated. During the first pacing test both groups developed ischemia. After perindoprilat administration, the increase in systemic vascular resistance and LV end-diastolic pressure were significantly blunted (p <0.05). Further, the ischemia-induced increase in arterial and cardiac uptake of norepinephrine was inhibited by perindoprilat, and the increase in atrial natriuretic peptide was less pronounced; also, ST-segment depression was reduced by 32% compared with placebo (all p <0.05). In the group with LV dysfunction, perindoprilat reduced LV end-diastolic pressure significantly by 67% and myocardial lactate production was prevented, but this did not happen in the group with normal LV function. In addition, the increase in arterial norepinephrine was reduced by 74% and 33%, respectively (p <0.05). These results indicate that perindoprilat reduced acute, pacing-induced ischemia in normotensive patients. In patients with (asymptomatic) LV dysfunction these effects were more pronounced than in patients with normal LV function.

Bradykinin-mediated cardiovascular protective actions of ACE inhibitors. A new dimension in anti-ischaemic therapy?

In addition to being accepted therapy in hypertension and heart failure, ACE inhibitors may well offer a new dimension in anti-ischaemic therapy. Currently, anti-ischaemic properties have been demonstrated by ACE inhibitors in selected patient groups, including patients with left ventricular dysfunction with or without a direct temporal relationship with myocardial infarction. Anti-ischaemic effects of ACE inhibitors become apparent late after initiation of treatment and suggest a structural rather than a functional effect. Underlying mechanisms may include a reduction in ventricular dilatation and (abnormal) cardiac hypertrophy, leading to less myocardial oxygen demand and, possibly, improved subendocardial blood supply, and vasculoprotective effects, i.e. anti-atherosclerotic and antiremodelling properties, a beneficial effect on the fibrinolytic system and an improvement in abnormal endothelial vasodilator function. The latter aspect is most probably the pivotal mode of action where the anti-ischaemic profile of ACE inhibition is concerned. An improvement in endothelial dysfunction has been shown in patients with mild to moderate coronary artery disease [Trial on Reversing ENdothelial Dysfunction (TREND)]. It is of importance that, in both clinical experiments and human studies, the role of bradykinin appears central in the structural and functional cardiovascular effects of ACE inhibition. This is particularly true for the improvement of impaired endothelial function. Myocardial ischaemia evokes vasoconstrictor neurohormonal activation, which may lead to coronary vasoconstriction in diseased coronary segments. The subsequent abnormal endothelial function leads to diminished coronary flow and also increases systemic vasotone and afterload, thus unfavourably altering the myocardial oxygen supply/demand ratio. Under laboratory conditions, acute ACE inhibition counteracts this activation in humans. However, it is speculated that this anti-ischaemic mechanism may become operative and clinically important during long term oral ACE inhibitor therapy when endothelial function improves, and may subsequently protect against the vasoconstrictor effect of neurohormonal activation. As it is unlikely that the mechanisms mentioned above are only relevant in patients with ventricular dysfunction or heart failure, several large controlled trials are currently examining the long term anti-ischaemic and cardiovascular protective effects of ACE inhibition in patients at risk of a cardiovascular event [Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study (HOPE)], with a normal cardiac function [Prevention of Events with ACE inhibition study (PEACE)] or in all patients with coronary artery disease irrespective of cardiac function [EUropean trial of Reduction Of cardiac events with Perindopril in stable coronary Artery disease (EUROPA)].

Current perspective on the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in the management of coronary (atherosclerotic) artery disease

OBJECTIVE

To review the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis, the role of the renin-angiotensin system in atherogenesis, and studies supporting the potential beneficial effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in reducing cardiovascular events with long-term use.

BACKGROUND

Through its action in converting angiotensin I to angiotensin II and by degrading bradykinin, local tissue ACE exerts many effects that can contribute to the development of atherosclerosis. Therefore, the use of ACE inhibitors can possibly result in antiatherogenic effects. Possible mechanisms for antiatherogenic effects of ACE inhibitors include: (1) reduction of blood pressure; (2) antiproliferative and antimigratory effects on vascular smooth muscle cells, neutrophils, and monocytes; (3) restoration of endothelial function; (4) stabilization of fatty plaque by preventing vasoconstriction; (5) antiplatelet effects; and (6) enhancement of endogenous fibrinolysis.

DATA SOURCES

English-language clinical studies, abstracts, and review articles pertaining to the use of ACE inhibitors and atherosclerosis.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant human studies examining the role of ACE inhibitors and atherosclerosis.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Studies evaluating the possible beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors in the development of atherosclerosis are reviewed and critiqued. Design of ongoing studies with clinical and surrogate end points are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on current published studies, recommendations are made regarding the use of ACE inhibitors in atherosclerosis. Therapeutic monitoring parameters for efficacy and adverse effects are also reviewed.

Long-term anti-ischemic effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in patients after myocardial infarction. The Captopril and Thrombolysis Study (CATS) Investigators

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition reduces myocardial ischemia and related events after myocardial infarction (MI).

BACKGROUND

The oxygen demand/supply ratio of the myocardium is influenced by angiotensin II as a result of its arterial vasoconstrictive and inotropic effects and through its interaction with the sympathetic nervous system.

METHODS

We studied 244 patients who had been included in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, post-MI, ACE inhibition intervention study (Captopril and Thrombolysis Study [CATS]). All patients underwent exercise testing before and 3 and 12 months after hospital discharge. After 1-year double-blind treatment, all patients continued receiving single-blind placebo for 1 month.

RESULTS

Total exercise time increased in both groups after 3 months (placebo: +86 +/- 13 s; captopril: +69 +/- 12 s, p = 0.8 between groups) and increased further after 1 year (placebo: +13 +/- 11 s; captopril: +33 +/- 13 s, p = 0.7 between groups). There were also no differences in mean ST segment depression. During the 12 months, significantly fewer ischemia-related events occurred in the captopril group (82 vs. 52, p = 0.015). This difference was found between 3 and 12 months but not during the first 3 months. After withdrawal from double-blind medication, nine ischemic events were reported in teh captopril group compared with one in the placebo group (p = 0.006 between groups).

CONCLUSIONS

The present data show that captopril may reduce the incidence of ischemia-related events after MI, which becomes apparent after 3 months. However, no anti-ischemic effect was observed during exercise testing. After withdrawal from ACE inhibition, a high incidence of clinical events occurred, suggesting a rebound phenomenon.

Cardioprotective effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with coronary artery disease

Clinical and experiments study with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors suggest that these agents may improve coronary artery disease by acting at multiple sites in the series of events leading to end-stage heart disease. These agents reduce blood pressure, improve prognosis and symptoms in patients with severe heart failure and in patients after acute myocardial infarction with left ventricular dysfunction. They are useful in the early, acute phase of myocardial infarction. More recently, ACE inhibitors have been shown to reduce in vitro vascular hypertrophy, to attenuate arteriosclerosis, and to maintain endothelium function. Whether these effects occur at clinical levels is still uncertain. The exciting clinical data have led to the proposal that alteration of ACE activity, particularly in tissue, is an important factor in development and progression of CAD. The ACE system is complex, with endocrine, paracrine, and autocrine effects. ACE is present in cardiac and vascular tissue. Therefore, the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors can be classified as "cardio" and "vasculo" protective. This article summarizes a number of independent and complementary mechanisms pointing to a role of ACE and ACE inhibition in coronary artery disease.

Control of coronary blood flow by autacoids

Coronary flow and thus myocardial perfusion is regulated by myogenic, metabolic, humoral and neuro-hormonal factors which closely interact with local autacoids released from the endothelial lining of the coronary bed. In a number of disease states an impaired synthesis and release of autacoids decisively limit the overall capacity of coronary regulation and adaptation of myocardial perfusion to increased metabolic demands. The important factors for these control mechanisms are analyzed and reviewed in this article.

Reduction of ischemic events with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: lessons and controversy emerging from recent clinical trials

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy has been associated with a substantial (> or = 20%) reduction in the risk of major ischemic events in two recent clinical trials with long-term follow-up: Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) and the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) study. Participants in these studies included patients with a low ejection fraction (< or = 0.35 in SOLVD and < or = 0.40 in SAVE), generally without symptoms of congestive heart failure. Approximately 80% of patients enrolled in SOLVD and all participants in SAVE had histories of ischemic heart disease or acute myocardial infarction (SAVE). In both SOLVD and SAVE the risk of experiencing a major ischemic event such as myocardial infarction was reduced significantly following prolonged ACE inhibitor therapy. In the SOLVD trial, this effect was evident across a range of patient subgroups, including varying concomitant drug therapies. In both studies, several months elapsed before this benefit became apparent, suggesting an effect on underlying ischemic pathophysiology. A third trial of ACE inhibitor therapy postinfarction, the Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy (AIRE) Study, demonstrated a 27% reduction in all cause mortality but no effect on myocardial infarction after a 15-month mean follow-up. No effect of ACE inhibition on risk of survival or reinfarction was reported in the Cooperative New Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS-II), which began the drug within 24 hours of infarction and terminated follow-up at 6 months, a time not likely to demonstrate infarction reduction benefit based on the SOLVD and SAVE observations. Neither AIRE nor CONSENSUS-II had objectively determined left ventricular dysfunction as an entry criterion, as did SOLVD and SAVE, but AIRE mandated "clinical" congestive heart failure prior to randomization. More recently, preliminary results from the third Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI-3), the Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival (ISIS-4), and the Chinese Captopril Trial suggested that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor mortality benefits post-myocardial infarction would be detected in these megatrials as early as 35 days after the event.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Expanding the paradigm of the renin-angiotensin system and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors

The renin-angiotensin system acts systemically and locally to influence vascular tone, blood volume, myocardial contractility, thromboresistance, and tissue responses to injury. ACE inhibitors have assumed a vital role in the treatment of patients with ventricular dysfunction, including those who have sustained one or more myocardial infarctions. The greatest benefits appear over time and not unexpectedly are most pronounced in cases of moderate to severe reduction in left ventricular performance. Emerging evidence suggests that the paradigm for ACE inhibitor use will expand even further, opening new doors for patient care.

Effects of captopril on ischemic events after myocardial infarction. Results of the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement trial. SAVE Investigators

BACKGROUND

In the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) trial, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) was the most important predictor of a poor outcome and conferred a sevenfold increase in risk of death. The purpose of this study was to determine the predictors of recurrent MI in study participants and to examine the influence of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor captopril on this and other myocardial ischemic events.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The 2231 patients had survived the acute phase of MI (3 to 16 days) and had a radionuclide ventricular ejection fraction < or = 40%. Patients were randomly assigned to receive double-blind treatment with either placebo or captopril and were followed for an average of 42 months. The influence of captopril on recurrent MI, cardiac revascularization procedures, and hospitalization with unstable angina was examined. The likelihood of recurrent MI was greater in patients with an MI or functional disability before the index infarction and higher systolic pressure (all P < .001) but was not influenced by baseline left ventricular ejection fraction. Therapy with captopril reduced the risk of development of recurrent MI by 25% (95% confidence intervals, 5% to 40%; P = .015) and the risk of death after recurrent MI by 32% (95% confidence intervals, 4% to 51%; P = .029). Captopril-assigned patients were also less likely to require cardiac revascularization procedures (P = .010), but hospitalization for unstable angina was unaltered. When all three of these major coronary ischemic events were considered together, captopril therapy reduced the risk (14% risk reduction; 95% confidence intervals, 0% to 26%; P = .047).

CONCLUSIONS

In post-MI patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction, long-term administration of captopril reduced recurrence of MI and the need for cardiac revascularization but had no influence on the rate of hospitalization with a discharge diagnosis of unstable angina. The finding that the recurrence of MI was independent of left ventricular ejection fraction suggests that captopril could be useful in preventing recurrent MI in patients with more preserved left ventricular function. The need for cardiac revascularization was reduced in patients receiving long-term captopril therapy, suggesting either an anti-ischemic effect or the ability of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor to modify the atherosclerotic process in survivors of MI.

Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on exercise-induced angina and ST segment depression in patients with microvascular angina

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition may lessen myocardial ischemia in patients with microvascular angina.

BACKGROUND

Patients with syndrome X (angina pectoris, positive findings on exercise testing and normal coronary arteriogram) have a reduced coronary vasodilator reserve ("microvascular angina") and may show an increased sympathetic drive. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition attenuates sympathetic coronary vasoconstriction in patients with coronary artery disease.

METHODS

Ten patients (seven women and three men, mean age [+/- SD] 53 +/- 6 years) with syndrome X and a reduced coronary flow reserve underwent a randomized, single-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled study of the effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril on angina and exercise-induced ST segment depression. Assessment was by symptom-limited treadmill exercise testing after 2 weeks of treatment with 10 mg/day of enalapril and after 2 weeks of placebo administration.

RESULTS

All patients had positive findings on exercise testing (> or = 1 mm ST segment depression and angina) while taking placebo, whereas six patients had a positive test result (four with angina) during enalapril therapy. Total exercise duration and time to 1 mm of ST segment depression were prolonged by enalapril over those obtained with placebo (mean 779 +/- 141 vs. 690 +/- 148 s, p = 0.006 and 690 +/- 204 vs. 485 +/- 241 s, p = 0.007, respectively). The magnitude of ST segment depression was also less with enalapril than with placebo (mean 1.1 +/- 0.4 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.2 mm, p = 0.004). Heart rate and blood pressure at peak exercise and at 1 mm of ST depression were not significantly different during placebo and enalapril treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition lessens exercise-induced ischemia in patients with syndrome X and microvascular angina, probably by a direct modulation of coronary microvascular tone, which results in an increased myocardial oxygen supply.

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in chronic stable angina: effects on myocardial ischaemia and comparison with nifedipine

OBJECTIVES

To determine the anti-ischaemic effects of a new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, benazepril, compared with nifedipine, alone and in combination, in chronic stable angina caused by coronary artery disease.

DESIGN

Placebo controlled, double blind, latin square design.

SETTING

Regional cardiology service for a mixed urban and rural population.

SUBJECTS

40 patients with stable exertional angina producing at least 1 mm ST segment depression on exercise test with the Bruce protocol. 34 patients completed all four phases of the trial.

INTERVENTIONS

Each patient was treated with placebo, benazepril (10 mg twice daily), nifedipine retard (20 mg twice daily), and a combination of benazepril and nifedipine in the same doses, in random order for periods of two weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS

Total duration of exercise was not increased by any treatment. Exercise time to the development of 1 mm ST segment depression was not significantly changed with benazepril alone or in combination with nifedipine but was increased with nifedipine from 4.18 (1.8) min to 4.99 (1.6) min (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.28 to 1.34; p < 0.05). There was a significant relation between increase in duration of exercise and resting renin concentration (r = 0.498; p < 0.01). Myocardial ischaemia during daily activity, as assessed by ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring, was reduced by benazepril and by the benazepril and nifedipine combination. This was significant for total ischaemic burden (451(628) min v 231(408) min; 95% CI -398 to -41 min; p < 0.05) and maximal depth of ST segment depression (-2.47(1.2) mm v -2.16 mm; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.57; p < 0.05) for the combination and for maximal ST segment depth for benazepril monotherapy (-2.47 (1.2) mm v -1.96(1.2) mm; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.91; p < 0.05). Benazepril significantly altered the circadian rhythm of cardiac ischaemia, abolishing the peak ischaemic periods at 0700 to 1200 and 1700 to 2300 (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Benazepril, an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, had a modest anti-ischaemic effect in effort angina, but this effect was not as pronounced as with nifedipine. The anti-ischaemic action was more noticeable in asymptomatic ischaemia during daily activity, whereas nifedipine had little effect on this aspect of myocardial ischaemia. The combination of benazepril and nifedipine reduced ischaemia of daily activity.

Therapeutic effects of captopril on ischemia and dysfunction of the left ventricle after Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction

Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors has a beneficial effect on myocardial ischemia and left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. The effect of captopril on myocardial ischemia was evaluated in 58 patients with left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < 45%) after Q-wave or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction in a placebo-controlled, parallel, double-blind study. Patients were randomized on day 7 to either placebo or captopril (50 mg daily) and monitoring for a period of 180 days by serial echocardiography and ambulatory ST-segment monitoring. There was a significant effect of captopril on the duration of ambulatory ST depression during the 180 days: The values per day were reduced from 28 +/- 5 min at baseline to 2 +/- 1 min on day 180 in the Q-wave group (p < 0.01) and from 39 +/- 10 min at baseline to 6 +/- 1 min on day 180 in the non-Q-wave group (p < 0.05). In the placebo group the duration of ST depression on day 180 were 21 +/- 8 min in the Q-wave group and 22 +/- 7 min in the non-Q-wave group, thus being significantly higher as compared with the corresponding captopril groups (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). In the placebo Q-wave group there was a significant increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index from 74 +/- 3.5 to 89 +/- 4.5 ml/m2 (p < 0.01) during the study period, which was in contrast to unchanged values of 75.5 +/- 3.0 and 75.0 +/- 3.5 ml/m2 (not significant [NS]) in the captopril Q-wave group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cardioprotection with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: redefined for the 1990s

The concept of "cardioprotection" with ACE inhibitors has evolved over the last decade. In the 1980s, protective benefits of ACE inhibitors in hypertension were established, regression of left ventricular hypertrophy was demonstrated, and improved ventricular function and survival in mild-to-moderate and severe congestive heart failure was documented. A further "protective" role of ACE inhibitors in coronary artery disease is emerging as more attention is focused on the concept of local tissue renin-angiotensin systems. Recent contributions to the literature describe significant benefits of ACE-inhibitor therapy in acute myocardial infarction, including suppression of ventricular arrhythmias and reduction of both early and late ventricular dilation, preservation of left ventricular function, and improved survival. All of the above effects can be considered "cardioprotective." However, as new benefits are reported in the 1990s, a broadened view of "cardiovascular protection" emerges from investigative studies in the literature. ACE inhibitors may reduce tolerance to nitrates, reduce angina in some but not all studies, and limit smooth muscle cell proliferation (and perhaps restenosis) induced by experimental balloon angioplasty. Local vascular effects may attenuate atherosclerotic changes in the arterial wall in experimental animals and may decrease the incidence of aneurysm formation in hypertensive animals. The effectiveness of ACE inhibitors in acute myocarditis, suggested by reports that captopril may reduce lesions of murine myocarditis when administered early after infection with coxsackievirus B3, requires clinical confirmation. Despite these apparently diverse "cardiovascular protective" consequences of ACE inhibitor therapy, the mechanism(s) of action of these agents remain to be elucidated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of enalapril on myocardial infarction and unstable angina in patients with low ejection fractions

An association between raised renin levels and myocardial infarction has been reported. We studied the effects of enalapril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, on the development of myocardial infarction and unstable angina in 6797 patients with ejection fractions < or = 0.35 enrolled into the two Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) trials. Patients were randomly assigned to placebo (n = 3401) or enalapril (n = 3396) at doses of 2.5-20 mg per day in two concurrent double-blind trials with the same protocol. Patients with heart failure entered the treatment trial (n = 2569) and those without heart failure entered the prevention trial (n = 4228). Follow-up averaged 40 months. In each trial there were significant reductions in the number of patients developing myocardial infarction (treatment trial: 158 placebo vs 127 enalapril, p < 0.02; prevention trial: 204 vs 161 p < 0.01) or unstable angina (240 vs 187 p < 0.001; 355 vs 312, p < 0.05). Combined, there were 362 placebo group patients with myocardial infarction compared with 288 in the enalapril group (risk reduction 23%, 95% CI 11-34%; p < 0.001). 595 placebo group patients developed unstable angina compared with 499 in the enalapril group (risk reduction 20%, 95% CI 9-29%, p < 0.001). There was also a reduction in cardiac deaths (711 placebo, 615 enalapril; p < 0.003), so that the reduction in the combined endpoint of deaths, myocardial infarction, and unstable angina was highly significant (20% risk reduction, 95% CI 14-26%; p < 0.0001). Enalapril treatment significantly reduced myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and cardiac mortality in patients with low ejection fractions.

Current concepts: converting enzyme inhibitors in coronary artery disease

Studies investigating the antiischemic action of converting enzyme inhibitors (CEIs) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) have, after single dosing, provided evidence for mechanisms of action such as coronary vasodilation and reduction of myocardial oxygen-consumption due to pre- and afterload reduction. Measurements of exercise-induced ST-segment depression and exercise duration as criteria for clinical efficacy have revealed contradictory findings. Patient characteristics, which may be important for a satisfactory response to CEI treatment, have yet to be identified. Patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction may benefit from CEI therapy. Neurohumoral factors, e.g., plasma renin activity and atrial natriuretic peptide, may also be relevant. The anti-ischemic efficacy of CEIs given as monotherapy has not yet been convincingly demonstrated. The protective effect of CEI treatment with regard to ventricular enlargement after myocardial infarction seems to be established; however, data on mortality are still outstanding.

Coronary vasodilatation and improved myocardial lactate metabolism after angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition with cilazapril in patients with congestive heart failure

The effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition on systemic and coronary hemodynamics and on myocardial lactate metabolism were investigated before and 2 and 6 hours after cilazapril at rest and during supine submaximal exercise in 10 patients with New York Heart Association class II or III chronic congestive heart failure. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition, indicated by a significant increase in plasma renin activity, resulted in significant reductions in blood pressure and systemic vascular resistance. Myocardial oxygen demand decreased (resting double product 10.9 +/- 3.7 vs 12.2 +/- 3.8 mm Hg beats/min 10(-3); p less than 0.05), but coronary sinus blood flow remained unchanged and calculated coronary resistance decreased (0.45 vs 0.5 units, rest 6 hours; p less than 0.05) suggesting coronary vasodilatation. Changes in coronary vascular resistance were directly related to changes in systemic vascular resistance (r = 0.75, p less than 0.5). Myocardial lactate extraction increased at rest (47 +/- 60 vs 134 +/- 132 mumol/min; p less than 0.5) and during exercise (27 +/- 54 vs 491 +/- 317 mumol/min; p less than 0.05) both in patients with coronary artery disease (n = 5) and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 5). Resting lactate production was converted to lactate extraction in two patients with coronary artery disease. Neither plasma catecholamine nor atrial natriuretic peptide concentrations changed significantly. The results suggest coronary vasodilation and improved aerobic myocardial metabolism by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in patients with congestive heart failure.

The role of captopril as single therapy in hypertension and angina pectoris

Eighteen hypertensive patients with a resting diastolic blood pressure between 100 and 120 mmHg who also had angina and proven coronary arterial disease entered a dose titration study to evaluate the efficacy of captopril as a single therapy in hypertension and coexisting stable angina. Captopril was administered for 2 weeks at 25 or 50 mg three times daily and the patients evaluated subjectively and by maximal symptom limited treadmill exercise testing. In comparison to placebo captopril 25 mg and 50 mg dosage increased time to 1 mm ST depression from 188.2 +/- 24.4 sec on placebo to 337.6 +/- 29.5 and 364.2 +/- 36.2 sec respectively (P less than 0.01). The maximum ST segment depression was reduced from 2.5 +/- 0.25 mm on placebo to 1.4 +/- 0.22 mm on captopril 25 mg and 1.2 +/- 0.30 mm on captopril 50 mg (P less than 0.01). Exercise duration increased from 310.3 +/- 21.4 sec on placebo to 438.3 +/- 27.3 sec on captopril 25 mg and to 460.9 +/- 26.5 sec on captopril 50 mg (P less than 0.01). The resting systolic blood pressure decreased from 184.1 +/- 4.7 mmHg on placebo to 159 +/- 4.2 mmHg on captopril 25 mg and to 150.9 +/- 4.6 mmHg on captopril 50 mg (less than 0.01). Similarly, diastolic blood pressure decreased from 111.6 +/- 2.1 mmHg on placebo to 93.8 +/- 1.3 mmHg on captopril 25 mg and to 90.0 +/- 1.7 mmHg on captopril 50 mg (P less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of early captopril administration on infarct expansion, left ventricular remodeling and exercise capacity after acute myocardial infarction

In a double-blind study, 99 patients (82 men, age range 40 to 75 years) with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were randomly assigned to receive captopril or placebo. Treatment began within 24 hours of admission. Serial echocardiographic measurements of endocardial segment lengths and left ventricular (LV) volumes, and ejection fractions were obtained. The 2 groups were matched at baseline except for an excess of previous AMI in the placebo group (13 of 50 vs 2 of 49 patients, p = 0.002). The increase in anterior segment length, from baseline to 2 months, was significantly less in the captopril than in the placebo group (2.8 +/- 1.6 vs 10.4 +/- 2.4mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] -13.5 to -1.7, p = 0.01). The increase in posterior segment length was also less in the captopril group, but the difference was not significant (3.2 +/- 1.2 vs 7.0 +/- 1.8mm, 95% CI -8.0 to 0.5, p = 0.08). Fewer patients in the captopril group demonstrated increases in segment length greater than 2 standard deviations of the measurement error (14 of 70 [20%] vs 29 of 72 [40%] patients, p = 0.009). In patients with anterior AMI, the infarct-containing anterior segment length increased by 4.5 +/- 2.3 mm in the captopril versus 12.4 +/- 3.1 mm in the placebo group (95% CI -15.7 to -0.2, p = 0.046), and fewer patients in the captopril group demonstrated infarct expansion (6 of 20 [30%] vs 13 of 21 [62%] patients, p = 0.04).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of captopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, in patients with angina pectoris and heart failure

The effects of captopril and placebo were compared in 18 patients with chronic heart failure and angina pectoris with use of a double-blind crossover trial design. Symptoms were assessed by patient treatment preference, visual analogue scores and nitroglycerin consumption. Exercise performance was assessed using two different treadmill protocols of different work intensity with simultaneous measurement of oxygen consumption and by supine bicycle exercise and simultaneous radionuclide ventriculography. Arrhythmias were assessed by 48 h ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring. Patients generally preferred placebo to captopril, and this appeared to be due to an increase in symptoms of angina with captopril. Treadmill exercise time on a high intensity protocol was shorter with captopril than with placebo; on a low intensity protocol, angina became a more frequent limiting symptom even though overall exercise performance was not changed. The heart rate-blood pressure product was reduced, but largely because of a reduction in blood pressure rather than in heart rate. During supine bicycle exercise, no differences in symptoms, exercise performance, ejection fraction or changes in blood pressure were noted and ventricular arrhythmias were reduced. Captopril does not appear to be clinically useful in alleviating angina pectoris in patients with heart failure, and this effect may be related to a decrease in coronary perfusion pressure. Nonetheless, desirable metabolic effects, a reduction in arrhythmias and potential effects on survival require further study of captopril in patients with both angina and heart failure.

Effects of benazepril and metoprolol OROS alone and in combination on myocardial ischemia in patients with chronic stable angina

The efficacy of benazepril, metoprolol OROS and their combination was evaluated in 29 patients (42 to 74 years of age) with chronic stable angina and documented coronary artery disease in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial using serial quantitated exercise testing and ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring. The mean (+/- SEM) exercise time was 8.5 +/- 0.7 min with placebo, 8.3 +/- 0.6 min (95% confidence interval [CI]-1.06 to 0.54) with benazepril, 9.4 +/- 0.5 min (95% CI -0.32 to 2.14) with metoprolol OROS and 9.6 +/- 0.5 min (95% CI -0.25 to 2.47) with the combination of benazepril and metoprolol OROS. The mean exercise time to the development of 1 mm ST segment depression was prolonged from 6.0 +/- 0.6 min with placebo to 6.3 +/- 0.6 min (95% CI -0.93 to 1.45) with benazepril, 7.9 +/- 0.5 min (95% CI 0.83 to 3.0) with metoprolol OROS and 8.1 +/- 0.6 min (95% CI 0.88 to 3.29) with the combination of benazepril and metoprolol OROS. Benazepril did not alter the rest or maximal heart rate, whereas metoprolol OROS alone and in combination significantly lowered the heart rate at rest and during maximal exercise. Systolic blood pressure at rest was nonsignificantly reduced, whereas diastolic blood pressure was lowered significantly by all treatments in comparison with placebo. At maximal exercise, only metoprolol OROS, whether given alone or in combination with benazepril, was able to blunt significantly systolic blood pressure and rate-pressure product.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

ACE inhibitors for the treatment of myocardial ischemia?

Apart from their established use in the treatment of hypertension and heart failure, ACE inhibitors have been suggested to exert anti-ischemic effects. This article reviews the mechanisms of systemic and intracardiac angiotensin formation, as well as its interaction with the bradykinin, the prostaglandin, and the sympathetic nervous system. While high doses of angiotensin can precipitate myocardial ischemia. experimental data on a potential beneficial effect of ACE inhibitors on ischemic myocardial blood flow and function are inconsistent and controversial. Pooling the few available clinical data, several ACE inhibitors may attenuate myocardial ischemia at rest and during exercise. However, a significant fraction of patients does not benefit or even deteriorates. Recent experimental studies suggest a beneficial role of ACE inhibitors in attenuating reperfusion arrhythmias and postinfarction left ventricular remodeling. Unless the mechanisms and determinants of potential anti-ischemic actions of ACE inhibitors can be better defined, their use for treatment of myocardial ischemia cannot be recommended at present.