The association between ACE inhibitors and psoriasis based on the drug-targeted Mendelian randomization and real-world pharmacovigilance analyses

BACKGROUND

Although a growing number of observational studies suggest that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) intake may be a risk factor for psoriasis, evidence is still insufficient to draw definitive conclusions.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Drug-targeted Mendelian randomization (DTMR) was used to analyze the causality between genetic proxied ACEIs and psoriasis. Furthermore, we performed a disproportionality analysis based on the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database to identify more suspicious subclasses of ACEIs.

RESULTS

Using two kinds of genetic proxy instruments, the present DTMR research identified genetic proxied ACEIs as risk factors for psoriasis. Furthermore, our disproportionality analysis revealed that ramipril, trandolapril, perindopril, lisinopril, and enalapril were associated with the risk of psoriasis, which validates and refines the findings of the DTMR.

CONCLUSIONS

Our integrative study verified that ACEIs, especially ramipril, trandolapril, perindopril, lisinopril, and enalapril, tended to increase the risk of psoriasis statistically.

Appraisal of anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory potential of ramipril against Freund's adjuvant-provoked arthritic rat model

Because of evident role of renin-angiotensin system in the etiology of rheumatoid arthritis, the current study's objective was to assess the anti-arthritic efficacy of ramipril through CFA-instigated arthritic model. The drug has been shown to have anti-inflammatory potential. CFA-instigated arthritic model assessed the anti-arthritic efficacy of ramipril by estimating different parameters, including paw volume, arthritic index scoring, haematological and biochemical attributes, histological and radiographic analyses, and various cytokines level. Ramipril significantly (p < 0.001) reduced paw volume and the arthritic index especially at the dose of 4mg/kg. The biochemical and haematological changes were likewise restored to normal by ramipril administration with an increase in anti-inflammatory cytokines while reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines level. Ramipril's ability to prevent arthritis by preserving the normal architecture of arthritis-induced joints is further supported by radiographic and histological investigation. The study's findings demonstrated ramipril's considerable anti-arthritic activity. To identify the precise mechanism of action, however, thorough mechanistic studies are still needed.

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor potentiates the hypoglycaemic effect of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) in rats

The inhibition of renin angiotensin system pathway has been largely documented to be effective in the control of cardiovascular events. The present study investigated the effect of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor on fasting blood glucose level in hypertension induced by the inhibition of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) in male Wistar rats. Hypertension was induced by the inhibition of NOS using a non-selective NOS inhibitor, NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME). The blockade of NOS resulted in an increase in blood pressure, ACE, angiotensin II and endothelin-1 levels, and a decrease in fasting blood glucose and nitric oxide (NO) levels. The hypertensive rats treated with ACE inhibitor (ramipril) recorded a decrease in blood pressure, ACE, angiotensin II, endothelin-1, NO and fasting blood glucose levels, and an increase in prostacyclin level. In conclusion, ACE inhibitor potentiated the hypoglycaemic effect of NOS inhibitor and this effect is independent of NO and pancreatic insulin release.

Polypill Strategy in Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention

BACKGROUND

A polypill that includes key medications associated with improved outcomes (aspirin, angiotensin-converting-enzyme [ACE] inhibitor, and statin) has been proposed as a simple approach to the secondary prevention of cardiovascular death and complications after myocardial infarction.

METHODS

In this phase 3, randomized, controlled clinical trial, we assigned patients with myocardial infarction within the previous 6 months to a polypill-based strategy or usual care. The polypill treatment consisted of aspirin (100 mg), ramipril (2.5, 5, or 10 mg), and atorvastatin (20 or 40 mg). The primary composite outcome was cardiovascular death, nonfatal type 1 myocardial infarction, nonfatal ischemic stroke, or urgent revascularization. The key secondary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal type 1 myocardial infarction, or nonfatal ischemic stroke.

RESULTS

A total of 2499 patients underwent randomization and were followed for a median of 36 months. A primary-outcome event occurred in 118 of 1237 patients (9.5%) in the polypill group and in 156 of 1229 (12.7%) in the usual-care group (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60 to 0.96; P = 0.02). A key secondary-outcome event occurred in 101 patients (8.2%) in the polypill group and in 144 (11.7%) in the usual-care group (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.90; P = 0.005). The results were consistent across prespecified subgroups. Medication adherence as reported by the patients was higher in the polypill group than in the usual-care group. Adverse events were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with a polypill containing aspirin, ramipril, and atorvastatin within 6 months after myocardial infarction resulted in a significantly lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events than usual care. (Funded by the European Union Horizon 2020; SECURE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02596126; EudraCT number, 2015-002868-17.).

A logistic regression model based on inpatient health records to predict drug-induced liver injury caused by ramipril—An angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare side effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs). Ramipril is a widely used ACE compound because of its effectiveness in the treatment of hypertension and heart failure, as well as its low risk of adverse effects. However, the clinical features of ramipril, and the risk of DILI, have not been adequately studied. A retrospective cohort study was performed based on data from 3909 inpatients to compare the risk of DILI conferred by ramipril and other ACEIs. A logistic regression model was then constructed and validated against data from 1686 patients using ramipril, of which 117 patients were diagnosed with DILI. The use of ramipril increased the risk of DILI by 2.68 times (odds ratio = 2.68; 95% confident interval (CI):1.96–3.71) compared with the group using other ACEIs. The clinical features of DILI in the ramipril group were similar to those from the ACEI group (P>0.05), except that the ALT level was higher (P<0.05). A logistic regression model including Body mass index (BMI), comorbidity, liver disease, daily dose, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was built and successfully validated for DILI risk prediction, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the model of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.752–0.888). We recommend that clinicians should be aware of the levels of ALT and ALP as well as BMI, comorbidities, and liver disease before prescribing ramipril to avoid the risk of DILI in patients.

Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

In patients with symptomatic heart failure, sacubitril-valsartan has been found to reduce the risk of hospitalization and death from cardiovascular causes more effectively than an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor. Trials comparing the effects of these drugs in patients with acute myocardial infarction have been lacking.

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients with myocardial infarction complicated by a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, pulmonary congestion, or both to receive either sacubitril-valsartan (97 mg of sacubitril and 103 mg of valsartan twice daily) or ramipril (5 mg twice daily) in addition to recommended therapy. The primary outcome was death from cardiovascular causes or incident heart failure (outpatient symptomatic heart failure or heart failure leading to hospitalization), whichever occurred first.

RESULTS

A total of 5661 patients underwent randomization; 2830 were assigned to receive sacubitril-valsartan and 2831 to receive ramipril. Over a median of 22 months, a primary-outcome event occurred in 338 patients (11.9%) in the sacubitril-valsartan group and in 373 patients (13.2%) in the ramipril group (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 1.04; P = 0.17). Death from cardiovascular causes or hospitalization for heart failure occurred in 308 patients (10.9%) in the sacubitril-valsartan group and in 335 patients (11.8%) in the ramipril group (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.07); death from cardiovascular causes in 168 (5.9%) and 191 (6.7%), respectively (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.08); and death from any cause in 213 (7.5%) and 242 (8.5%), respectively (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.05). Treatment was discontinued because of an adverse event in 357 patients (12.6%) in the sacubitril-valsartan group and 379 patients (13.4%) in the ramipril group.

CONCLUSIONS

Sacubitril-valsartan was not associated with a significantly lower incidence of death from cardiovascular causes or incident heart failure than ramipril among patients with acute myocardial infarction. (Funded by Novartis; PARADISE-MI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02924727.).

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of chronic heart failure

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is an unprecedented challenge. Meeting this has resulted in changes to working practices and the impact on the management of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is largely unknown. We performed a retrospective, observational study contrasting patients diagnosed with HFrEF attending specialist heart failure clinics at a UK hospital, whose subsequent period of optimisation of medical therapy was during the COVID-19 pandemic, with patients diagnosed the previous year. The primary outcome was the change in equivalent dosing of ramipril and bisoprolol at 6-months. Secondary outcomes were the number and type of follow-up consultations, hospitalisation for heart failure and all-cause mortality. In total, 60 patients were diagnosed with HFrEF between 1 December 2019 and 30 April 2020, compared to 54 during the same period of the previous year. The absolute number of consultations was higher (390 vs 270; p = 0.69), driven by increases in telephone consultations, with a reduction in appointments with hospital nurse specialists. After 6-months, we observed lower equivalent dosing of ramipril (3.1 ± 3.0 mg vs 4.4 ± 0.5 mg; p = 0.035) and similar dosing of bisoprolol (4.1 ± 0.5 mg vs 4.9 ± 0.5 mg; p = 0.27), which persisted for ramipril (mean difference 1.0 mg, 95% CI 0.018-2.09; p = 0.046) and bisoprolol (mean difference 0.52 mg, 95% CI -0.23-1.28; p = 0.17) after adjustment for baseline dosing. We observed no differences in the proportion of patients who died (5.0% vs 7.4%; p = 0.59) or were hospitalised with heart failure (13.3% vs 9.3%; p = 0.49). Our study suggests the transition to telephone appointments and re-deployment of heart failure nurse specialists was associated with less successful optimisation of medical therapy, especially renin-angiotensin inhibitors, compared with usual care.

Ramipril in High-Risk Patients With COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory-syndrome coronavirus-2 that interfaces with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) through angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. This interaction has been proposed as a potential risk factor in patients treated with RAAS inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES

This study analyzed whether RAAS inhibitors modify the risk for COVID-19.

METHODS

The RASTAVI (Renin-Angiotensin System Blockade Benefits in Clinical Evolution and Ventricular Remodeling After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) trial is an ongoing randomized clinical trial randomly allocating subjects to ramipril or control groups after successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement at 14 centers in Spain. A non-pre-specified interim analysis was performed to evaluate ramipril's impact on COVID-19 risk in this vulnerable population.

RESULTS

As of April 1, 2020, 102 patients (50 in the ramipril group and 52 in the control group) were included in the trial. Mean age was 82.3 ± 6.1 years, 56.9% of the participants were male. Median time of ramipril treatment was 6 months (interquartile range: 2.9 to 11.4 months). Eleven patients (10.8%) have been diagnosed with COVID-19 (6 in control group and 5 receiving ramipril; hazard ratio: 1.150; 95% confidence interval: 0.351 to 3.768). The risk of COVID-19 was increased in older patients (p = 0.019) and those with atrial fibrillation (p = 0.066), lower hematocrit (p = 0.084), and more comorbidities according to Society of Thoracic Surgeons score (p = 0.065). Admission and oxygen supply was required in 4.9% of patients (2 in the ramipril group and 3 in the control group), and 4 of them died (2 in each randomized group). A higher body mass index was the only factor increasing the mortality rate (p = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

In a high-risk population of older patients with cardiovascular disease, randomization to ramipril had no impact on the incidence or severity of COVID-19. This analysis supports the maintenance of RAAS inhibitor treatment during the COVID-19 crisis. (Renin-Angiotensin System Blockade Benefits in Clinical Evolution and Ventricular Remodeling After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation [RASTAVI]; NCT03201185).

Multicap to improve adherence after acute coronary syndromes: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Adherence to treatment after a myocardial infarction (MI) is poor, even in the early postinfarction period. Combining evidence-based drugs into a multicap could improve adherence in this population. No previous randomized trial assessing fixed-dose combination therapy has included patients early after a MI. We aimed to assess if a multicap containing four secondary prevention drugs increases adherence to treatment at 6 months after MI hospitalization. The study was designed as a randomized, parallel, open-label, controlled trial.

METHODS

Patients were randomized within 7 days of a MI to either multicap or control group. The multicap group received a capsule containing aspirin, atenolol, ramipril, and simvastatin. The control group received each drug in separate pills. The primary outcome was adherence at 6 months. We also measured blood pressure, heart rate, serum cholesterol levels, C-reactive protein, and platelet aggregation.

RESULTS

The study was stopped prematurely when 100 patients were included for futility. At 6 months, 92 (95.8%) patients were adherent to medical treatment: 98.0% in the multicap group and 93.5% in the control group [relative risk (RR) 1.05; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96-1.14; p = 0.347]. There were no differences between groups in systolic blood pressure (p = 0.662), diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.784), heart rate (p = 0.533), total cholesterol (p = 0.760), LDL-c (p = 0.979), C-reactive protein (p = 0.399), or in the proportion of patients with adequate platelet aggregation inhibition (p = 0.600).

CONCLUSIONS

The study did not find any improvement in the adherence at 6 months after a MI with a multicap-based strategy (Multicap for Increase Adherence After Acute Myocardial Infarction; [ ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02271178]).

Hypertension Treatment Effects on Orthostatic Hypotension and Its Relationship With Cardiovascular Disease

Although orthostatic hypotension (OH) is often considered a contraindication to blood pressure (BP) treatment, evidence is lacking. We examined the effect of BP goal or initial medication choice on OH in AASK (African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension), a 2×3 factorial trial. Blacks with chronic kidney disease attributed to hypertension were randomly assigned 1 of 2 BP goals: intensive (mean arterial pressure, ≤92 mm Hg) or standard (mean arterial pressure, 102-107 mm Hg) and 1 of 3 initial medications (ramipril, metoprolol, and amlodipine). Postural changes in systolic BP, diastolic BP, or heart rate (HR) were determined after 2 minutes and 45 seconds of standing. OH was assessed each visit and defined using the consensus definition (drop in systolic BP ≥20 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥10 mm Hg). Median follow-up was 4 years. Outcomes were congestive heart failure, stroke, nonfatal cardiovascular disease (CVD), fatal CVD, any CVD (composite of preceding events), and all-cause mortality. There were 1094 participants (mean age, 54.5±10.7 years; 38.8% female; OH was assessed at 52 864 visits). Mean seated systolic BP, diastolic BP, and HR were 150.3±23.9 mm Hg, 95.5±14.2 mm Hg, and 72.0±12.6 bpm, respectively. A more intensive BP goal did not alter the distributions of standing BP and was not associated with OH, but metoprolol was associated with systolic OH compared with ramipril (odds ratio, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.15-2.46) and amlodipine (odds ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.09-3.44). Although consensus OH was associated with stroke (HR, 5.01; 95% CI, 1.80-13.92), nonfatal CVD (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.21-4.30), and any CVD event (HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.12-3.98), neither BP goal or medication altered this risk. Concerns about causing OH or its CVD consequences should not deter a lower BP goal among adults with chronic kidney disease attributed to hypertension.

Fatal outcome of late-onset angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor induced angioedema: A case report

RATIONALE

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are one of the most used medication among patients with arterial hypertension. In most cases, ACE inhibitors caused side effects are mild; however, from 0.1% to 0.7% of patients can develop life threatening adverse effect, angioedema. Unlike histamine mediated, ACE inhibitor-related angioedema can develop at any time during the treatment course.

PATIENT CONCERNS

An 89-year-old woman with a medical history for arterial hypertension, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, chronic atrial fibrillation developed ACE inhibitor-induced angioedema after 5 years of daily ramipril administration.

DIAGNOSES

Arterial hypertension, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, chronic atrial fibrillation and late onset ACE inhibitor-induced angioedema.

INTERVENTIONS

The ACE inhibitor was used for arterial hypertension on a daily basis for the past 5 years. Patient developed airway obstruction requiring intubation. Standard therapy with epinephrine, methylprednisolone and clemastine was administered. Treatment was ineffective, considering that angioedema persisted.

OUTCOMES

Angioedema resolved after 13 days from the discontinuation of ramipril. Death due to cardiopulmonary insufficiency occurred 24 days after the admission to intensive care unit, despite full clinical resolution of ACE inhibitor-induced angioedema.

LESSONS

Our case highlight the importance of educating clinicians about ACE inhibitor-induced angioedema, as potentially fatal adverse drug reaction. Considering the fact, that no laboratory or confirmatory test exist to diagnose ACE inhibitor-induced angioedema, clinicians' knowledge is the key element in recognition of ACE inhibitor-related angioedema.

Angiotensin receptor blocker vs ACE inhibitor effects on HDL functionality in patients on maintenance hemodialysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) reduce cardiovascular events in the general population. Maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients are at high cardiovascular risk but few studies have directly addressed the comparative efficacy of these drugs. MHD disrupts the normally atheroprotective actions of high density lipoprotein (HDL), therefore, we compared ACEI or ARB treatment on HDL functions in MHD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

HDL was isolated at the starting point (pre) and 3-6 months later (post) in 30 MHD randomly assigned to placebo, ramipril or valsartan. Outcomes included cholesterol efflux, inflammatory cytokine response, effects on Toll-like receptors (TLR), superoxide production, methylarginine and serum amyloid A (SAA) levels. HDL from ARB- or ACEI-treated subjects was more effective in maintaining efflux than HDL of placebo. HDL from ARB- or ACEI-treated subjects but not placebo lessened cellular superoxide production. In contrast, neither ARB nor ACEI improved HDL anti-inflammatory effect. Indeed, HDL of ACEI-treated subjects potentiated the cytokine responses in association with activation of TLR but did not alter the HDL content of methylarginines or SAA.

CONCLUSION

Both ACEI and ARB stabilized HDL cholesterol acceptor function and sustained cellular anti-oxidative effects but not anti-inflammatory effects, and ACEI-treatment instead amplified the HDL inflammatory response. The findings reveal possible utility of antagonizing angiotensin actions in MDH and suggest a possible mechanism for superiority of ARB vs ACEI in the setting of advanced kidney disease.

Fixed-dose vs free-dose combinations for the management of hypertension-An analysis of 81 958 patients

Fixed-dose combinations (FDC) have been developed to reduce the pill burden for hypertensive patients. Data on fixed-dose or free-dose (freeDC) ramipril/amlodipine (R/A) or candesartan/amlodipine (C/A) combination treatment initiation were assessed. 71 463 patients were prescribed R/A and 10 495 C/A. For both R/A and C/A, FDC patients were younger (both P < .001) and less comorbid. Prior MI (OR: 0.61 and 0.60), prior stroke (OR: 0.68 and 0.70) and CHD (OR: 0.68 and 0.64) were negatively associated with FDC use, whereas hyperlipidemia was positively associated (OR: 1.26 and 1.19). Use of antihypertensive comedication (OR: 0.78; OR: 0.55) and treatment discontinuation within 12 months (HR: 0.65 and 0.82) were less likely in FDC patients, who also showed superior adherence (mean MPR; both P < .001). Cost of the combination was higher for FDCs (both P < .001). FDCs improve persistence and adherence, although they are more commonly prescribed in patients with less cardiovascular disease.

PATHOMORPHOLOGY OF THE MYOCARDIUM, KIDNEY AND LIVER IN SPONTANEOUSLY HYPERTENSIVE RATS TREATED WITH SHORT AND LONG-TERM USE RAMIPRIL AND CANDESARTAN

Choosing a method of treating arterial hypertension remains an urgent problem today. For effective therapy, it is necessary to select hypotensive drugs that not only effectively reduce the pressure, but also contribute to the restoration of the structure of tissues sensitive to oscillations of arterial pressure. The purpose of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of the effect of angiotensin 2-candesartan receptor antagonist and angiotensin converting factor ramipril on pathomorphological changes in the myocardium, kidney, and liver in SHR lines that received treatment for 7 days (short) and 21 days (prolonged therapy ) The study was conducted on 20 spontaneously hypertensive rats with a mass of 248.0-441.0 g. The rabbit was administered at a dose of 5 mg / kg and candesartan 4 mg / kg, respectively. The period of short-term therapy was 7 days and long-term-21 days. For the evaluation of morphological changes in the heart, kidney, liver, frozen cross sections were stained using Ramonovsky-Giemsa method (H and E). The data obtained indicate a more significant effect of candesartan on myocardium and kidney. Ramipril had a negative effect on the renal tubules, increasing the degree of atrophy. Treatment with ramipril and candesartan, especially with long-term use, reduced the hydropic swelling of hepatocytes.

Achieved blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients: results from ONTARGET and TRANSCEND trials

BACKGROUND

Studies have challenged the appropriateness of accepted blood pressure targets. We hypothesised that different levels of low blood pressure are associated with benefit for some, but harm for other outcomes.

METHODS

In this analysis, we assessed the previously reported outcome data from high-risk patients aged 55 years or older with a history of cardiovascular disease, 70% of whom had hypertension, from the ONTARGET and TRANSCEND trials investigating ramipril, telmisartan, and their combination, with a median follow-up of 56 months. Detailed descriptions of randomisation and intervention have already been reported. We analysed the associations between mean blood pressure achieved on treatment; prerandomisation baseline blood pressure; or time-updated blood pressure (last on treatment value before an event) on the composite outcome of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and hospital admission for heart failure; the components of the composite outcome; and all-cause death. Analysis was done by Cox regression analysis, ANOVA, and χ². These trials were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00153101.

FINDINGS

Recruitment for ONTARGET took place between Dec 1, 2001, and July 31, 2008. TRANSCEND took place between Nov 1, 2001, and May 30, 2004. 30 937 patients were recruited from 733 centres in 40 countries and followed up for a median of 56 months. In ONTARGET, 25 127 patients known to be tolerant to angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors were randomly assigned after a run-in period to oral ramipril 10 mg/day (n=8407), telmisartan 80 mg/day (n=8386), or the combination of both (n=8334). In TRANSCEND, 5810 patients who were intolerant to ACE-inhibitors were randomly assigned to oral telmisartan 80 mg/day (n=2903) or placebo (n=2907). Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) 140 mm Hg or higher was associated with greater incidence of all outcomes compared with 120 mm Hg to less than 140 mm Hg. By contrast, a baseline diastolic blood pressure (DBP) less than 70 mm Hg was associated with the highest risk for most outcomes compared with all DBP categories 70 mm Hg or more. In 4052 patients with SBP less than 120 mm Hg on treatment, the risk of the composite cardiovascular outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1·14, 95% CI 1·03-1·26), cardiovascular death (1·29, 1·12-1·49), and all deaths (1·28, 1·15-1·42) were increased compared with those in whom SBP was 120-140 mm Hg during treatment (HR 1 for all outcomes, n=16099). No harm or benefit was observed for myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospital admission for heart failure. Mean achieved SBP more accurately predicted outcomes than baseline or time-updated SBP, and was associated with the lowest risk at approximately 130 mm Hg, and at 110-120 mm Hg risk increased for the combined outcome, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death except stroke. A mean DBP less than 70 mm Hg (n=5352) during treatment was associated with greater risk of the composite primary outcome (HR 1·31, 95% CI 1·20-1·42), myocardial infarction (1·55, 1·33-1·80), hospital admission for heart failure (1·59, 1·36-1·86) and all-cause death (1·16, 1·06-1·28) than a DBP 70-80 mm Hg (14 305). A pretreatment and mean on-treatment DBP of about 75 mm Hg was associated with the lowest risk.

INTERPRETATION

Mean achieved SBP less than 120 mm Hg during treatment was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular outcomes except for myocardial infarction and stroke. Similar patterns were observed for DBP less than 70 mm Hg, plus increased risk for myocardial infarction and hospital admission for heart failure. Very low blood pressure achieved on treatment was associated with increased risks of several cardiovascular disease events. These data suggest that the lowest blood pressure possible is not necessarily the optimal target for high-risk patients, although it is not possible to rule out some effect of reverse causality.

FUNDING

Boehringer Ingelheim.

[Risk of renal dysfunction in an elderly patient with chronic heart failure]

The treatment of elderly multimorbid patients according to clinical guidelines often results in polypharmacy. An individual risk assessment is required to consider the possibility of deprescribing especially potentially inappropriate medication in the elderly. This exemplary case report describes a medication review of a patient with multiple chronic cardiovascular diseases taking into account the impact on renal function.

Genetic variants associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-associated angioedema

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to identify genetic variants associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor-associated angioedema.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

We carried out a genome-wide association study in 175 individuals with ACE inhibitor-associated angioedema and 489 ACE inhibitor-exposed controls from Nashville (Tennessee) and Marshfield (Wisconsin). We tested for replication in 19 cases and 57 controls who participated in Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET).

RESULTS

There were no genome-wide significant associations of any single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) with angioedema. Sixteen SNPs in African Americans and 41 SNPs in European Americans were associated moderately with angioedema (P<10) and evaluated for association in ONTARGET. The T allele of rs500766 in PRKCQ was associated with a reduced risk, whereas the G allele of rs2724635 in ETV6 was associated with an increased risk of ACE inhibitor-associated angioedema in the Nashville/Marshfield sample and ONTARGET. In a candidate gene analysis, rs989692 in the gene encoding neprilysin (MME), an enzyme that degrades bradykinin and substance P, was significantly associated with angioedema in ONTARGET and Nashville/Marshfield African Americans.

CONCLUSION

Unlike other serious adverse drug effects, ACE inhibitor-associated angioedema is not associated with a variant with a large effect size. Variants in MME and genes involved in immune regulation may be associated with ACE inhibitor-associated angioedema.

Ramipril-induced liver injury: case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Ramipril, an inhibitor of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACEI), is a drug commonly used in the therapy of hypertension. ACEI-induced hepatotoxicity is rare, and most of the reported cases are associated with captopril. Here, we present the first case of ramipril-induced liver injury proven by positive rechallenge and a review of the literature including the data from the US Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system (FAERS).

METHODS

Patient data were collected in the Berlin Case-Control Surveillance Study for adverse drug reactions. PubMed research on ACEI-induced hepatotoxicity included all ACEIs except captopril; analysis of the FAERS database focused on ramipril-induced hepatotoxicity in the period 2009-2011.

RESULTS

A 40-year-old male patient presented with acute onset jaundice and highly (>20-fold increase of alanine aminotranferase (ALT)) elevated liver enzymes (LEs). Viral or autoimmune hepatitis and biliary etiology were ruled out. Withdrawal of several medications including ramipril resulted in an immediate decrease in LEs, whereas a subsequent re-exposure with ramipril resulted in a striking increase in LEs (>35-fold increase of ALT). After definitely discontinuing ramipril, a rapid decline in LEs was observed, suggesting a certain causal relationship between drug intake and hepatic damage. Analysis of the FAERS database retrieved 65 cases of ramipril-associated hepatotoxicity, with jaundice being the most frequent hepatic adverse event. PubMed research detected 23 relevant publications, with enalapril being the ACEI most commonly reported as being associated with liver injury.

CONCLUSIONS

ACEI-induced hepatotoxicity is rare. Our case confirms a hepatotoxic potential of ramipril, highlighting the need for alertness among physicians regarding this matter.

[Evaluation of efficacy and safety of hypertension treatment with original angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: the comparison of original and generic formulations]

The hypertension is a civilization disease, slowly destroying the cardio-vascular system and leading to serious complications, which may result in patient death. Critical factors enhancing the proper functioning of the body are: properly selected pharmacotherapy and the self-control of the blood pressure.

THE AIM OF THIS STUDY

was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the hypertension treatment with generic and original formulations of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

To the study, which consisted of an interview and completed a joint survey were enrolled 120 patients with hypertension therapy based on formulations of ACE inhibitors group. Data for the analysis were obtained from surveys conducted in: Department of Angiology, Hypertension and Diabetology, Department and Clinic of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Isotope Therapy and its Clinic for Diabetic Outpatients, in the period from 03/02/2011 to 20/04/2011.

RESULTS

Out of 120 surveyed hypertensive patients treated with ACEI, 79 persons (66%) received the original preparations and 41 (34%) generic medications. Most preparations contained ramipril: 78 patients, of whom 50 received the original formulations and 28 a generic one. In this population no differences were found in the reduction of the systolic and the diastolic blood pressure between groups of patients receiving original and generic formulations. The most common adverse effects (AE) reported by patients were cough (n = 16), hypotension (n = 7), paresthesia (n = 6), skin lesions (n = 6), weakness (n = 5), headache and dizziness (n = 5). Some of these, i.e.: cough, weakness, headaches and dizziness, occurred more frequently in patients receiving therapy with generic preparations.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the reference and generic preparations showed similar efficacy in reducing systolic and diastolic pressure. The therapy with original drugs leads less frequently to adverse effects such as cough, weakness, headaches and dizziness.

[Critically appraised article]

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are known to reduce proteinuria. Their combination might be more effective than either treatment alone, but long-term data for comparative changes in renal function are not available. We investigated the renal effects of ramipril (an ACE inhibitor), telmisartan (an ARB), and their combination in patients aged 55 years or older with established atherosclerotic vascular disease or with diabetes with end-organ damage.

METHODS

The trial ran from 2001 to 2007. After a 3-week run-in period, 25,620 participants were randomly assigned to ramipril 10 mg a day (n = 8,576), telmisartan 80 mg a day (n = 8,542), or to a combination of both drugs (n = 8,502; median follow-up was 56 months), and renal function and proteinuria were measured. The primary renal outcome was a composite of dialysis, doubling of serum creatinine, and death. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00153101.

FINDINGS

784 patients permanently discontinued randomised therapy during the trial because of hypotensive symptoms (406 on combination therapy, 149 on ramipril, and 229 on telmisartan). The number of events for the composite primary outcome was similar for telmisartan (n = 1,147 [13.4%]) and ramipril (1,150 [13.5%]; hazard ratio [HR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.92-1.09), but was increased with combination therapy (1,233 [14.5%]; HR 1.09, 1.01-1.18, p = 0.037). The secondary renal outcome, dialysis or doubling of serum creatinine, was similar with telmisartan (189 [2.21%]) and ramipril (174 [2.03%];HR 1.09, 0.89-1.34) and more frequent with combination therapy (212 [2.49%]: HR 1.24,1.01-1.51, p = 0.038). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) declined least with ramipril compared with telmisartan (-2.82 [SD 17.2] mL/min/1.73 m² vs -4.12 [17.4], p < 0.0001) or combination therapy (-6.11 [17.9], p < 0.0001). The increase in urinary albumin excretion was less with telmisartan (p = 0.004) or with combination therapy (p=0.001) than with ramipril.

INTERPRETATION

In people at high vascular risk, telmisartans effects on major renal outcomes are similar to ramipril. Although combination therapy reduces proteinuria to a greater extent than monotherapy, overall it worsens major renal outcomes.

Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors reduce the progression of mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis: 10 year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Proteinuria is a common presentation of mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis (MsPGN). No studies are available on the long-term effect of treatment by renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors on renal outcome in MsPGN patients. This study prospectively evaluates the effects of RAS inhibitors on renal outcome in patients with low risk MsPGN followed up for 10 years using historical patients with similar features at the time of presentation as untreated controls.

ENDPOINTS

decrease of basal proteinuria>20% and loss>20% of basal glomerular filtrate rate (GFR) at the end of first year of observation. The patients were re-evaluated bimonthly during the first year and every 6 months thereafter.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients fulfilled the selection criteria. After one year follow-up 19 patients reached the endpoint of proteinuria and no patient reached the endpoint of GFR. No significant change in blood pressure levels (BP) and GFR was registered, by contrast daily proteinuria decreased significantly (p<0.001), falling by 29% at sixth month and 47% at the end of the follow-up. The historical control group consisted of 15 untreated patients seen between 1987 and 1992. The two-way analysis of variance for repeated measures showed greater values of GFR (p<0.001) and lower levels of daily proteinuria (p<0.001) in treated patients as compared to untreated controls.

CONCLUSIONS

This 10-year follow-up study indicates that the early treatment with RAS inhibitors at low doses favourably influences the long-term renal outcome in proteinuric patients with MsPGN. Limitations were the small sample size and lack of randomization.

Telmisartan for the management of patients at high cardiovascular risk

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) places a significant burden on healthcare providers. High blood pressure (BP) is the single most prevalent risk factor for CVD worldwide and is responsible for more deaths than any other risk factor. 'Cardiovascular (CV) high-risk patients' make up the broad cross-section of patients in the middle of the risk spectrum for CVD progression that is referred to as the CV continuum and includes those with atherothrombotic disease, those with target organ damage associated with type 2 diabetes and those with multiple risk factors. Angiotensin II is involved in CVD progression at every stage of the CV continuum, making the renin-angiotensin system a rational target for pharmacologic intervention. Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) offer a better tolerated alternative to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, with greater long-term adherence. The ARB telmisartan recently received an indication for CV prevention.

SCOPE

A PubMed literature search was conducted to identify evidence on the use of telmisartan for preventing CV events.

FINDINGS

Telmisartan has a favourable safety and tolerability profile, and has demonstrated efficacious and long-lasting 24-hour BP reductions, whether as monotherapy or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide or amlodipine. In the largest CV prevention trial program undertaken with an ARB (the ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial; ONTARGET), telmisartan 80 mg/day alone was as effective as ramipril in reducing the composite primary endpoint of CV mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospitalization for heart failure in CV high-risk patients. However, patients were significantly more likely to adhere to treatment with telmisartan than ramipril due to its better tolerability.

CONCLUSION

To date, telmisartan is the only ARB indicated to reduce CV morbidity in a broad CV high-risk population.

Telmisartan, ramipril, or both in high-risk Chinese patients: analysis of ONTARGET China data

BACKGROUND

The results from the ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET) indicated that the angiotensin-receptor blocker telmisartan was not inferior to the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor ramipril in reducing the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke or hospitalization for congestive heart failure in high-risk patients, and telmisartan was associated with slightly superior tolerability. The combination of the two drugs was associated with more adverse events without an increase in benefit. This study aimed to analyze the data from ONTARGET obtained from a subgroup of patients enrolled in China and to evaluate the demographic and baseline characteristics, the compliance, efficacy, and safety of the different treatment strategies in randomized patients in China.

METHODS

A total of 1159 high-risk patients were randomized into three treatment groups: with 390 assigned to receive 80 mg of telmisartan, 385 assigned to receive 10 mg of ramipril and 384 assigned to receive both study medications. The median follow-up period was 4.3 years.

RESULTS

The mean age of Chinese patients was 65.6 years, 73.6% of patients were male. The proportion of patients with stroke/transient ischemic attacks at baseline in China was two times more than the entire study population (47.7% vs. 20.9%). In Chinese patients the proportion of permanent discontinuation of study medication due to cough was 0.5% in the telmisartan group, which was much less than that in the combination or the ramipril group. There were no significant differences in the incidence of primary outcome among three treatment groups of Chinese patients. More strokes occurred in Chinese patients than in the entire study population (8.5% vs. 4.5%). Greater systolic blood pressure reduction (-9.8 mmHg), and more renal function failure were noted in the combination treatment group than in the ramipril or telmisartan group (2.6% vs. 1.6% and 1.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no evidence that the results of ONTARGET differed between Chinese patients and the entire study population with respect to the incidence of primary outcome, particularly safety. Compliance with study medications was good. The evidence from ONTARGET indicated that the treatment strategies in ONTARGET were applicable to patients in China.

Ramipril and risk of hyperkalemia in chronic hemodialysis patients

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors provide well known cardiorenal-protective benefits added to antihypertensive effects in chronic renal disease. These agents are underused in management of patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) because of common concern of hyperkalemia. However, few studies have investigated effect of renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade on serum potassium in hemodialysis patients. We assessed the safety of ramipril in patients on maintenance HD. We enrolled 28 adult end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients treated by maintenance HD and prescribed them ramipril in doses of 1.25 to 5 mg per day. They underwent serum potassium concentration measurements before ramipril introduction and in 1 to 3 months afterwards. No significant increase in kalemia was found. Results of our study encourage the use of ACE inhibitors in chronically hemodialyzed patients, but close potassium monitoring is mandatory.

Dual renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade for diabetic kidney disease

Blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) prevents the development and progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). It is controversial whether the simultaneous use of two RAAS inhibitors (ie, dual RAAS blockade) further improves renal outcomes. This review examines the scientific rationale and current clinical evidence addressing the use of dual RAAS blockade to prevent and treat DKD. It is concluded that dual RAAS blockade should not be routinely applied to patients with low or moderate risk of progressive kidney disease (normoalbuminuria or microalbuminuria with preserved glomerular filtration rate). For patients with high risk of progressive kidney disease (substantial albuminuria or impaired glomerular filtration rate), clinicians should carefully weigh the potential risks and benefits of dual RAAS blockade on an individual basis until ongoing clinical trials provide further insight.

Strict blood-pressure control and progression of renal failure in children

BACKGROUND

Although inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system delays the progression of renal failure in adults with chronic kidney disease, the blood-pressure target for optimal renal protection is controversial. We assessed the long-term renoprotective effect of intensified blood-pressure control among children who were receiving a fixed high dose of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitor.

METHODS

After a 6-month run-in period, 385 children, 3 to 18 years of age, with chronic kidney disease (glomerular filtration rate of 15 to 80 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) of body-surface area) received ramipril at a dose of 6 mg per square meter of body-surface area per day. Patients were randomly assigned to intensified blood-pressure control (with a target 24-hour mean arterial pressure below the 50th percentile) or conventional blood-pressure control (mean arterial pressure in the 50th to 95th percentile), achieved by the addition of antihypertensive therapy that does not target the renin-angiotensin system; patients were followed for 5 years. The primary end point was the time to a decline of 50% in the glomerular filtration rate or progression to end-stage renal disease. Secondary end points included changes in blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate, and urinary protein excretion.

RESULTS

A total of 29.9% of the patients in the group that received intensified blood-pressure control reached the primary end point, as assessed by means of a Kaplan-Meier analysis, as compared with 41.7% in the group that received conventional blood-pressure control (hazard ratio, 0.65; confidence interval, 0.44 to 0.94; P=0.02). The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to the type or incidence of adverse events or the cumulative rates of withdrawal from the study (28.0% vs. 26.5%). Proteinuria gradually rebounded during ongoing ACE inhibition after an initial 50% decrease, despite persistently good blood-pressure control. Achievement of blood-pressure targets and a decrease in proteinuria were significant independent predictors of delayed progression of renal disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensified blood-pressure control, with target 24-hour blood-pressure levels in the low range of normal, confers a substantial benefit with respect to renal function among children with chronic kidney disease. Reappearance of proteinuria after initial successful pharmacologic blood-pressure control is common among children who are receiving long-term ACE inhibition. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00221845.)

[Renal effect of treatment for heart failure]

The case of a 66-year-old male with heart failure and cardiorenal syndrome is presented. The patient had normal renal function before intensive treatment with diuretics and ACE inhibitor. Shortly after the ACE inhibitor was stopped and diuretics were either stopped or reduced in dosage, his renal function normalized. Suggestions are presented for follow-up after initiation of ACE inhibitor treatment.

Renal outcomes with telmisartan, ramipril, or both, in people at high vascular risk (the ONTARGET study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are known to reduce proteinuria. Their combination might be more effective than either treatment alone, but long-term data for comparative changes in renal function are not available. We investigated the renal effects of ramipril (an ACE inhibitor), telmisartan (an ARB), and their combination in patients aged 55 years or older with established atherosclerotic vascular disease or with diabetes with end-organ damage.

METHODS

The trial ran from 2001 to 2007. After a 3-week run-in period, 25 620 participants were randomly assigned to ramipril 10 mg a day (n=8576), telmisartan 80 mg a day (n=8542), or to a combination of both drugs (n=8502; median follow-up was 56 months), and renal function and proteinuria were measured. The primary renal outcome was a composite of dialysis, doubling of serum creatinine, and death. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00153101.

FINDINGS

784 patients permanently discontinued randomised therapy during the trial because of hypotensive symptoms (406 on combination therapy, 149 on ramipril, and 229 on telmisartan). The number of events for the composite primary outcome was similar for telmisartan (n=1147 [13.4%]) and ramipril (1150 [13.5%]; hazard ratio [HR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.92-1.09), but was increased with combination therapy (1233 [14.5%]; HR 1.09, 1.01-1.18, p=0.037). The secondary renal outcome, dialysis or doubling of serum creatinine, was similar with telmisartan (189 [2.21%]) and ramipril (174 [2.03%]; HR 1.09, 0.89-1.34) and more frequent with combination therapy (212 [2.49%]: HR 1.24, 1.01-1.51, p=0.038). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) declined least with ramipril compared with telmisartan (-2.82 [SD 17.2] mL/min/1.73 m(2)vs -4.12 [17.4], p<0.0001) or combination therapy (-6.11 [17.9], p<0.0001). The increase in urinary albumin excretion was less with telmisartan (p=0.004) or with combination therapy (p=0.001) than with ramipril.

INTERPRETATION

In people at high vascular risk, telmisartan's effects on major renal outcomes are similar to ramipril. Although combination therapy reduces proteinuria to a greater extent than monotherapy, overall it worsens major renal outcomes.

Safety and tolerability of ramipril 10 mg in patients at high risk of cardiovascular events: an observational study

To assess the safety and tolerability of ramipril 10 mg in patients at high risk of cardiovascular (CV) events by observing the levels of blood pressure (BP) and by recording the incidence of cough in these patients, a study was conducted in a total of 1048 patients who participated in the registry. Eligible patients in this prospective, observational, longitudinal, multicentre registry included all normotensives--including treated hypertensives--with BP <140/90 mm Hg, a history of coronary aritery disease and a history of cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease or diabetes (with micro-albuminuria) or dyslipidaemia, in whom ramipril was indicated for CV risk reduction and had been prescribed by the treating physician. The primary outcome was the effect on BP at 8 weeks, and the secondary outcome was the incidence of cough at 8 weeks. Ramipril was initiated at 2.5 mg once daily (OD) for a week, followed by 5 mg OD for 3 weeks and was then increased to 10 mg OD. Data was analysed using ANOVA and Chi-square test. A total of 1,048 patients participated in this registry; 868 (82.82%) continued with the treatment till the end of the registry (ie, 8 weeks). At baseline, systolic BP was 130.10 +/- 5.38 mm Hg, while diastolic BP was 81.07 +/- 4.36 mm Hg. At 8 weeks, these values changed non-significantly to 123.41 +/- 6.33 mm Hg and 79.03 +/- 4.84 mm Hg, respectively. At week 1, 41 patients had cough, which increased non-significantly to 58 by week 8. Only 6 patients complained of severe cough at week 8, which did not lead to treatment discontinuation. Tolerability of the treatment was assessed to be 'excellent' or 'good' by 63.3% patients and 67% physicians. Treatment with ramipril 10 mg daily in patients with high risk of CV events and normal/ controlled BP produced neither a significant fall in BP nor significant adverse events in real-world clinical practice and was well tolerated.

Safety and tolerability of ramipril 10 mg in patients at high risk of cardiovascular events: an observational study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and tolerability of ramipril 10 mg in patients at high risk of cardiovascular (CV) events by observing the levels of blood pressure (BP) and by recording the incidence of cough in these patients.

METHODS

Eligible patients in this prospective, observational, longitudinal, multicentre registry included all normotensives-including treated hypertensives-with BP <140/90 mm Hg, a history of coronary artery disease and a history of cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease or diabetes (with microalbuminuria), or dyslipidaemia, in whom ramipril was indicated for CV risk reduction and had been prescribed by the treating physician. The primary outcome was the effect on BP at 8 weeks, and the secondary outcome was the incidence of cough at 8 weeks. Ramipril was initiated at 2.5 mg once daily (o.d.) for a week, followed by 5 mg o.d. for 3 weeks and was then increased to 10 mg o.d. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Chi square test.

RESULTS

A total of 1,048 patients participated in this registry; 868 (82.87 percent;) continued with the treatment till the end of the registry (i.e., 8 weeks). At baseline, systolic BP was 130.1 +/- 5.38 mm Hg, while diastolic BP was 81.07 +/- 4.36 mm Hg. At 8 weeks, these values changed non-significantly to 123.41 +/- 6.33 mm Hg and 79.03 +/- 4.84 mm Hg, respectively. At week 1, 7.1% of patients had cough, which increased non-significantly to 10% by week 8. Only 6 patients complained of severe cough at week 8, which did not lead to treatment discontinuation. Tolerability of the treatment was assessed to be "excellent" or "good" by 63.3% patients and 67% physicians.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with ramipril 10 mg daily in patients with high risk of CV events and normal/controlled BP produced neither a significant fall in BP nor significant adverse events in real-world clinical practice and was well tolerated.

Telmisartan, ramipril, or both in patients at high risk for vascular events

BACKGROUND

In patients who have vascular disease or high-risk diabetes without heart failure, angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduce mortality and morbidity from cardiovascular causes, but the role of angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) in such patients is unknown. We compared the ACE inhibitor ramipril, the ARB telmisartan, and the combination of the two drugs in patients with vascular disease or high-risk diabetes.

METHODS

After a 3-week, single-blind run-in period, patients underwent double-blind randomization, with 8576 assigned to receive 10 mg of ramipril per day, 8542 assigned to receive 80 mg of telmisartan per day, and 8502 assigned to receive both drugs (combination therapy). The primary composite outcome was death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure.

RESULTS

Mean blood pressure was lower in both the telmisartan group (a 0.9/0.6 mm Hg greater reduction) and the combination-therapy group (a 2.4/1.4 mm Hg greater reduction) than in the ramipril group. At a median follow-up of 56 months, the primary outcome had occurred in 1412 patients in the ramipril group (16.5%), as compared with 1423 patients in the telmisartan group (16.7%; relative risk, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94 to 1.09). As compared with the ramipril group, the telmisartan group had lower rates of cough (1.1% vs. 4.2%, P<0.001) and angioedema (0.1% vs. 0.3%, P=0.01) and a higher rate of hypotensive symptoms (2.6% vs. 1.7%, P<0.001); the rate of syncope was the same in the two groups (0.2%). In the combination-therapy group, the primary outcome occurred in 1386 patients (16.3%; relative risk, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.07); as compared with the ramipril group, there was an increased risk of hypotensive symptoms (4.8% vs. 1.7%, P<0.001), syncope (0.3% vs. 0.2%, P=0.03), and renal dysfunction (13.5% vs. 10.2%, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Telmisartan was equivalent to ramipril in patients with vascular disease or high-risk diabetes and was associated with less angioedema. The combination of the two drugs was associated with more adverse events without an increase in benefit. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00153101 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Evaluation of fixed dose combination (FDC) of telmisartan+ramipril usage in patients with micro-albuminuria and persistent hypertension: A TRIUMPH study

Micro-albuminuria is a marker for declining kidney function and predicts increasing cardiovascular risk especially in diabetic hypertensives. Angiotensin receptor blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors may slow the progression of proteinuric kidney disease and thus would be valuable in these high risk patients. The present study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and tolerability of a fixed dose combination (FDC) of telmisartan and ramipril in adult Indian patients with sustained stage 2 hypertension, comorbidities and micro-albuminuria. A total 382 patients were enrolled in this multicentric, prospective open, non-comparative phase IV postmarketing surveillance study by 40 physicians in India and treated with FDC of telmisartan 40 mg+ ramipril 5 mg once daily for 12 weeks. A total 370 patients completed the study but 12 patients were lost to follow-up and considered as drop-outs. There was a significant (p<0.05) reduction in the systolic blood pressure (SBP) from 170.89 at baseline to 132. 77 mm Hg at week 12 and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from 104.47 to 83.30 mm Hg at the end of 12 weeks therapy as well as urine albumin levels from 186.25 mg/24-hour to 62.42 mg/24-hour (66.49%) at the end of 12 weeks. Overall assessment of treatment was rated as good to excellent in 87.3% and fair in 11.4% patients. The most common adverse event reported was cough (5.2%). Results of the present study indicate that the FDC of telmisartan+ramipril brings about significant reductions in the systolic and diastolic blood pressure as well as urine albumin excretion.

Effect of ramipril on renal function in patients with intermittent claudication

BACKGROUND

The Heart Outcomes Prevention Study (HOPE) demonstrated that ramipril resulted in a blood-pressure-independent 25% reduction in cardiovascular events in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Despite this, general practitioners and vascular surgeons remain reluctant to prescribe ACE inhibitors in this group of patients because of concerns about renal artery stenosis (RAS). We aimed to define the effect of ramipril on renal function in patients with intermittent claudication (IC).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of 132 unselected patients with IC entering the study 78 (59%) were excluded due to: current ACE inhibitor use (38%), renal impairment (serum creatinine above normal range) (15%), known severe RAS (1%) or unwillingness to participate (5%). The remaining 54 patients were titrated to 10 mg ramipril and renal function was monitored at 1, 5, and 12 weeks. Treatment was discontinued during titration in 5 patients due to symptoms (3) or lack of compliance (2). In the remainder, median [IQR] serum creatinine increased (94 [85.8-103.3] to 98 [88.0-106.5] micromol/L, p < or = 0.001) and median [IQR] GFR decreased (71.5 [64.6-82.3] to 68.7 [59.8-74.7] mL/min per 1.73 m2, p < or = 0.001) between baseline and 5 weeks. These changes were not considered clinically significant. By 12 weeks these values had returned almost to baseline (Cr 95.5 [88.0-103.25] micromol/L, GFR 71.8 [65.3-77.4] mL/min). No patient had a serum creatinine rise > 30%.

CONCLUSION

Most of patients with IC and a normal serum creatinine can be safely commenced on ramipril provided they are screened, titrated and monitored as described above. Studies in patients with borderline renal impairment (serum creatinine up to 30% above baseline) are on-going.

Diabetes prevention: still no effective drugs

In the DREAM trial, involving more than 5000 patients with "impaired glucose tolerance", ramipril had no preventive effect, while rosiglitazone had cardiac adverse effects.

Treatment of microalbuminuria in hypertensive subjects with elevated cardiovascular risk: Results of the IMPROVE trial

Microalbuminuria independently predicts increased cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients, especially in those with concomitant diabetes or established cardiovascular disease. Drugs that target the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system reduce microalbuminuria regardless of diabetic status. The Irbesartan in the Management of PROteinuric patients at high risk for Vascular Events was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled paralleled group study in which hypertensive patients with microalbuminuria and increased cardiovascular risk were randomized to 20 weeks treatment with ramipril plus irbesartan or to ramipril plus placebo. Patients discontinued or tapered previous antihypertensive therapy during a 14-day placebo lead-in period. Change in albumin excretion rate from baseline to week 20 was the primary end point. Adjusted week 20 baseline geometric ratios for ramipril plus irbesartan and ramipril plus placebo were not significantly different. Although differences in blood pressure reductions were observed between the two treatments, these changes did not affect microalbuminuria. More patients on dual therapy achieved target blood pressure goals at week 20 than with monotherapy. The incidence of adverse effects and treatment-related adverse effects was similar in both groups. Our results suggest that patients with cardiovascular risk and relatively low albumin excretion rates in early-stage disease may only require monotherapy with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone blocking agents.

Regression of left-ventricular hypertrophy in children and adolescents with hypertension during ramipril monotherapy

BACKGROUND

Left-ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity. Antihypertensive treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) is able to induce the regression of LVH in adults. However, there has been no study of the ability of ACEI to induce the regression of LVH in children. Our aim was to investigate the effect of ramipril on left-ventricular mass and blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive children.

METHODS

Twenty-one children (median age, 15 years) with renal (76%) or primary (24%) hypertension were prospectively treated with ramipril monotherapy for 6 months. Blood pressure was evaluated using ambulatory BP monitoring, with hypertension defined as mean BP >or=95th percentile. Left-ventricular hypertrophy was defined either as left-ventricular mass index (LVMI) >38.6 g/m(2.7) (pediatric definition) or as LVMI >51.0 g/m(2.7) (adult definition).

RESULTS

Nineteen children completed the study. The median LVMI decreased from 36.8 g/m(2.7) (range, 18.9 to 55.8 g/m(2.7)) to 32.6 g/m(2.7) (range, 19.0 to 52.1 g/m(2.7); P < .05) after 6 months. The prevalence of LVH decreased from 42% to 11% using the pediatric definition (P < .05) and did not change using the adult definition (ie, it remained at 5%). The median ambulatory BP decreased by 11, 7, 8, and 7 mm Hg for daytime systolic, daytime diastolic, nighttime systolic, and nighttime diastolic BP (P < .05), respectively. A positive correlation was found between LVMI and nighttime systolic BP at the start of the study (r = 0.46, P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Ramipril is an effective drug in children with hypertension, for its ability to reduce not only BP but also left-ventricular mass and induce regression of LVH.