Effects of statin therapy on diagnoses of new-onset diabetes and worsening glycaemia in large-scale randomised blinded statin trials: an individual participant data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous meta-analyses of summary data from randomised controlled trials have shown that statin therapy increases the risk of diabetes, but less is known about the size or timing of this effect, or who is at greatest risk. We aimed to address these gaps in knowledge through analysis of individual participant data from large, long-term, randomised, double-blind trials of statin therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised controlled trials of statin therapy that participated in the CTT Collaboration. All double-blind randomised controlled trials of statin therapy of at least 2 years' scheduled duration and with at least 1000 participants were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. All recorded diabetes-related adverse events, treatments, and measures of glycaemia were sought from eligible trials. Meta-analyses assessed the effects of allocation to statin therapy on new-onset diabetes (defined by diabetes-related adverse events, use of new glucose-lowering medications, glucose concentrations, or HbA1c values) and on worsening glycaemia in people with diabetes (defined by complications of glucose control, increased use of glucose-lowering medication, or HbA1c increase of ≥0·5%). Standard inverse-variance-weighted meta-analyses of the effects on these outcomes were conducted according to a prespecified protocol.

FINDINGS

Of the trials participating in the CTT Collaboration, 19 trials compared statin versus placebo (123 940 participants, 25 701 [21%] with diabetes; median follow-up of 4·3 years), and four trials compared more versus less intensive statin therapy (30 724 participants, 5340 [17%] with diabetes, median follow-up of 4·9 years). Compared with placebo, allocation to low-intensity or moderate-intensity statin therapy resulted in a 10% proportional increase in new-onset diabetes (2420 of 39 179 participants assigned to receive a statin [1·3% per year] vs 2214 of 39 266 participants assigned to receive placebo [1·2% per year]; rate ratio [RR] 1·10, 95% CI 1·04-1·16), and allocation to high-intensity statin therapy resulted in a 36% proportional increase (1221 of 9935 participants assigned to receive a statin [4·8% per year] vs 905 of 9859 participants assigned to receive placebo [3·5% per year]; 1·36, 1·25-1·48). For each trial, the rate of new-onset diabetes among participants allocated to receive placebo depended mostly on the proportion of participants who had at least one follow-up HbA1c measurement; this proportion was much higher in the high-intensity than the low-intensity or moderate-intensity trials. Consequently, the main determinant of the magnitude of the absolute excesses in the two types of trial was the extent of HbA1c measurement rather than the proportional increase in risk associated with statin therapy. In participants without baseline diabetes, mean glucose increased by 0·04 mmol/L with both low-intensity or moderate-intensity (95% CI 0·03-0·05) and high-intensity statins (0·02-0·06), and mean HbA1c increased by 0·06% (0·00-0·12) with low-intensity or moderate-intensity statins and 0·08% (0·07-0·09) with high-intensity statins. Among those with a baseline measure of glycaemia, approximately 62% of new-onset diabetes cases were among participants who were already in the top quarter of the baseline distribution. The relative effects of statin therapy on new-onset diabetes were similar among different types of participants and over time. Among participants with baseline diabetes, the RRs for worsening glycaemia were 1·10 (1·06-1·14) for low-intensity or moderate-intensity statin therapy and 1·24 (1·06-1·44) for high-intensity statin therapy compared with placebo.

INTERPRETATION

Statins cause a moderate dose-dependent increase in new diagnoses of diabetes that is consistent with a small upwards shift in glycaemia, with the majority of new diagnoses of diabetes occurring in people with baseline glycaemic markers that are close to the diagnostic threshold for diabetes. Importantly, however, any theoretical adverse effects of statins on cardiovascular risk that might arise from these small increases in glycaemia (or, indeed, from any other mechanism) are already accounted for in the overall reduction in cardiovascular risk that is seen with statin therapy in these trials. These findings should further inform clinical guidelines regarding clinical management of people taking statin therapy.

FUNDING

British Heart Foundation, UK Medical Research Council, and Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

Long-term cardiovascular risks and the impact of statin treatment on socioeconomic inequalities: a microsimulation model

BACKGROUND

UK cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence and mortality have declined in recent decades but socioeconomic inequalities persist.

AIM

To present a new CVD model, and project health outcomes and the impact of guideline-recommended statin treatment across quintiles of socioeconomic deprivation in the UK.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A lifetime microsimulation model was developed using 117 896 participants in 16 statin trials, 501 854 UK Biobank (UKB) participants, and quality-of-life data from national health surveys.

METHOD

A CVD microsimulation model was developed using risk equations for myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularisation, cancer, and vascular and non-vascular death, estimated using trial data. The authors calibrated and further developed this model in the UKB cohort, including further characteristics and a diabetes risk equation, and validated the model in UKB and Whitehall II cohorts. The model was used to predict CVD incidence, life expectancy, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and the impact of UK guideline-recommended statin treatment across socioeconomic deprivation quintiles.

RESULTS

Age, sex, socioeconomic deprivation, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular events were key CVD risk determinants. Model-predicted event rates corresponded well to observed rates across participant categories. The model projected strong gradients in remaining life expectancy, with 4-5-year (5-8 QALYs) gaps between the least and most socioeconomically deprived quintiles. Guideline-recommended statin treatment was projected to increase QALYs, with larger gains in quintiles of higher deprivation.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated the potential of guideline-recommended statin treatment to reduce socioeconomic inequalities. This CVD model is a novel resource for individualised long-term projections of health outcomes of CVD treatments.

The Effects of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition on Major Coronary Events in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the PARADISE-MI Trial

BACKGROUND

In patients who survive an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors decrease the risk of subsequent major cardiovascular events. Whether angiotensin-receptor blockade and neprilysin inhibition with sacubitril/valsartan reduce major coronary events more effectively than angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in high-risk patients with recent AMI remains unknown. We aimed to compare the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on coronary outcomes in patients with AMI.

METHODS

We conducted a prespecified analysis of the PARADISE-MI trial (Prospective ARNI vs ACE Inhibitors Trial to Determine Superiority in Reducing Heart Failure Events After MI), which compared sacubitril/valsartan (97/103 mg twice daily) with ramipril (5 mg twice daily) for reducing heart failure events after myocardial infarction in 5661 patients with AMI complicated by left ventricular systolic dysfunction, pulmonary congestion, or both. In the present analysis, the prespecified composite coronary outcome was the first occurrence of death from coronary heart disease, nonfatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for angina, or postrandomization coronary revascularization.

RESULTS

Patients were randomly assigned at a median of 4.4 [3.0-5.8] days after index AMI (ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction 76%, non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction 24%), by which time 89% of patients had undergone coronary reperfusion. Compared with ramipril, sacubitril/valsartan decreased the risk of coronary outcomes (hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.74-0.99], P=0.04) over a median follow-up of 22 months. Rates of the components of the composite outcomes were lower in patients on sacubitril/valsartan but were not individually significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

In survivors of an AMI with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and pulmonary congestion, sacubitril/valsartan-compared with ramipril-reduced the risk of a prespecified major coronary composite outcome. Dedicated studies are necessary to confirm this finding and elucidate its mechanism.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT02924727.

PARADISE-MI – event rates and treatment effect of sacubitril/valsartan v ramipril by the presence or absence of transient pulmonary congestion and/or LVEF less or greater than 40

Background/Introduction

Sacubitril/valsartan was compared to ramipril in patients with acute myocardial infarction in the PARADISE-MI trial. In the whole trial population sacubitril/valsartan did not reduce the composite primary outcome of CV death or incident heart failure compared to ramipril. Whether or not event rates and/or treatment effects vary in patients with different baseline characteristics is unknown.

Purpose

To investigate a) event rates b) the treatment effect of sacubitril/valsartan compared to ramipril and c) safety by the presence or absence of transient pulmonary congestion and/or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%.

Methods

PARADISE-MI was a double-blind, randomised clinical trial that compared sacubitril/valsartan to ramipril in 5661 patients with an acute myocardial infarction with either LVEF ≤40% and/or transient pulmonary congestion. 3 groups were investigated: 1) LVEF ≤40% with pulmonary congestion (n=2012) and 2) LVEF ≤40% without pulmonary congestion (n=2596) and 3) LVEF not ≤40% with pulmonary congestion (n=1044).

Results

Patients with pulmonary congestion (with and without LVEF ≤40%) were more likely to have had a prior MI, prior CABG or PCI, had more atrial fibrillation and were more often treated with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and diuretics than patients with no pulmonary congestion and LVEF ≤40%. Patients with LVEF ≤40% and pulmonary congestion had more than twice the rate of the primary composite outcome compared to those with LVEF ≤40% without pulmonary congestion: 10.2 (95% CI 9.2–11.3) vs. 4.8 (4.3–5.5) events per 100 patient-years, respectively). Patients with pulmonary congestion and LVEF not ≤40% had an intermediate event rate (6.6, 5.5–7.9, events per 100 patient-years). A similar pattern of event rates was seen for the components of the primary outcome and for all secondary outcomes whether Clinical Events Committee or investigator-reported events were analysed. The treatment effect of sacubitril/ valsartan versus ramipril did not vary between the 3 congestion/ LVEF subgroups. The safety of sacubitril/valsartan compared to ramipril did not vary between congestion/LVEF subgroups.

Conclusion

Patients with pulmonary congestion with or without LVEF ≤40% had higher rates of primary and all secondary outcomes than those without pulmonary congestion and LVEF ≤40%. The treatment effect, and safety, of sacubitril/valsartan compared to ramipril was consistent in patients with or without pulmonary congestion and with or without LVEF ≤40%.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis

Sacubitril/valsartan compared to ramipril in high risk post myocardial infarction patients stratified according use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists: insight from PARADISE MI trial

Background

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) reduce the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure admission in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) combined with either heart failure (HF) or diabetes. Whether use of MRA and initiation of sacubitril/valsartan are safe and whether MRAs modify the effect of sacubitril/valsartan initiation in high-risk MI patients is unknown.

Purpose

This analysis examined whether background treatment with a MRA modifies the treatment effect and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with a MI and LVSD and/or pulmonary congestion.

Methods

In the PARADISE MI Trial (Prospective ARNI vs. ACE inhibitor trial to DetermIne Superiority in reducing heart failure Events after Myocardial Infarction) N=5661 patients were randomized to either sacubitril/valsartan (97/103 mg twice daily) or ramipril (5 mg twice daily) within 7 days of their MI. The primary outcome in this analysis was the composite of worsening HF (HF hospitalization or outpatient worsening) or cardiovascular death evaluated by the clinical endpoint committee (CEC-adjudicated) or the investigators. Safety was defined as symptomatic hypotension, hyperkalemia >5.5 mmol/L or permanent drug discontinuation.

Results

A total of 2338 patients (41%) were treated with an MRA and they were more often Caucasian (79% vs. 73%), had worse left ventricular ejection fraction (34±8 vs. 38±10%), a higher KILLIP Class (63% vs. 55% in class II or more) and a lower estimated Glomerular filtration rate (71 vs. 73 ml/min/1.73 m2), than patients not taking an MRA. Age (63 years), sex (24% females), and frequency of diabetes (42%) did not differ. The treatment effect of sacubitril/valsartan compared with ramipril was similar in patients taking or not taking an MRA: hazard ratio (MRA): (95% confidence interval [CI]): 0.96 (0.77, 1.19) versus (95% CI: 0.87 (0.71, 1.05), respectively, for the primary endpoint (p value for interaction = 0.51) (CEC adjudicated) (Figure 1); similar findings were observed if investigator reported endpoints were evaluated (P=0.61 for interaction). Safety of sacubitril/valsartan compared to ramipril initiation was not changed by +/−MRA use, but an increase in symptomatic hypotension was observed (HR(MRA): 1.37 and HR: 1.39, P<0.001) in both groups (P=0.968 for interaction), whereas an increased risk of hyperkalemia or permanent drug discontinuation was not observed in the sacubitril/valsartan group (P>0.05 for all comparisons).

Conclusions

As expected, patients taking MRAs had a higher risk. Use of a MRA did not modify the treatment effect and safety of initiation of sacubitril/valsartan compared to ramipril in the post MI setting in patients with LVSD and/or congestion. Our analyses support that sacubitril/valsartan and MRAs can be used simultaneously.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis sponsored Randomized clinical trial

Rivaroxaban and aspirin vs. aspirin alone in Asian compared with non-Asian patients with chronic coronary artery disease or peripheral arterial disease: the COMPASS trial

AIMS

It is unknown whether Asian and non-Asian patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease derive similar benefits from long-term antithrombotic therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) and/or peripheral artery disease (PAD) enrolled in The Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies trial, the effects of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg b.i.d. plus aspirin 100 mg o.d. were compared with those of aspirin 100 mg o.d. in Asian vs. non-Asian patients (race was self-identified). Asians (n = 4269) vs. non-Asians (n = 23 126) had similar rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (4.85% vs. 4.83%, P = 0.30) and modified International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) major bleeding (2.72% vs. 2.58%, P = 0.22), but higher rates of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) (0.63% vs. 0.29%, P = 0.01) and minor bleeding (13.61% vs. 6.49%, P < 0.001). In Asians vs. non-Asians, the combination of rivaroxaban and aspirin compared with aspirin alone produced consistent reductions in MACE [Asians: hazard ratio (HR): 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45-0.90; non-Asians: HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.67-0.90; P(heterogeneity) = 0.29], increases in modified ISTH major bleeding (Asians: HR 2.24, 95% CI: 1.40-3.58; non-Asians: HR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.30-1.97; P = 0.20), and net clinical outcome (Asians: HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.56-1.05; non-Asians: HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.70-0.93, P = 0.78), but borderline higher rates of ICH (Asians: HR: 3.50, 95% CI: 0.98-12.56; non-Asians: HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.43, 1.53; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Asian compared with non-Asian patients with chronic CAD and/or PAD have higher rates of ICH and minor bleeding. The combination of rivaroxaban and aspirin vs. aspirin alone produces similar effects for MACE, modified ISTH major bleeding, and net clinical outcome but may be associated with higher rates of ICH in Asian patients.

Long-term safety and efficacy of anacetrapib in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease

AIMS

REVEAL was the first randomized controlled trial to demonstrate that adding cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor therapy to intensive statin therapy reduced the risk of major coronary events. We now report results from extended follow-up beyond the scheduled study treatment period.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 30 449 adults with prior atherosclerotic vascular disease were randomly allocated to anacetrapib 100 mg daily or matching placebo, in addition to open-label atorvastatin therapy. After stopping the randomly allocated treatment, 26 129 survivors entered a post-trial follow-up period, blind to their original treatment allocation. The primary outcome was first post-randomization major coronary event (i.e. coronary death, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization) during the in-trial and post-trial treatment periods, with analysis by intention-to-treat. Allocation to anacetrapib conferred a 9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3-15%; P = 0.004] proportional reduction in the incidence of major coronary events during the study treatment period (median 4.1 years). During extended follow-up (median 2.2 years), there was a further 20% (95% CI 10-29%; P < 0.001) reduction. Overall, there was a 12% (95% CI 7-17%, P < 0.001) proportional reduction in major coronary events during the overall follow-up period (median 6.3 years), corresponding to a 1.8% (95% CI 1.0-2.6%) absolute reduction. There were no significant effects on non-vascular mortality, site-specific cancer, or other serious adverse events. Morbidity follow-up was obtained for 25 784 (99%) participants.

CONCLUSION

The beneficial effects of anacetrapib on major coronary events increased with longer follow-up, and no adverse effects emerged on non-vascular mortality or morbidity. These findings illustrate the importance of sufficiently long treatment and follow-up duration in randomized trials of lipid-modifying agents to assess their full benefits and potential harms.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 48678192; ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT01252953; EudraCT No. 2010-023467-18.

Preventing heart failure: a position paper of the Heart Failure Association in collaboration with the European Association of Preventive Cardiology

The heart failure epidemic is growing and its prevention, in order to reduce associated hospital readmission rates and its clinical and economic burden, is a key issue in modern cardiovascular medicine. The present consensus document aims to provide practical evidence-based information to support the implementation of effective preventive measures. After reviewing the most common risk factors, an overview of the population attributable risks in different continents is presented, to identify potentially effective opportunities for prevention and to inform preventive strategies. Finally, potential interventions that have been proposed and have been shown to be effective in preventing HF are listed.

Association between common cardiovascular risk factors and clinical phenotype in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) EurObservational Research Programme (EORP) Cardiomyopathy/Myocarditis registry

AIMS

The interaction between common cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is poorly studied. We sought to explore the relation between CVRF and the clinical characteristics of patients with HCM enrolled in the EURObservational Research Programme (EORP) Cardiomyopathy registry.

METHODS AND RESULTS

1739 patients with HCM were studied. The relation between hypertension (HT), diabetes (DM), body mass index (BMI), and clinical traits was analysed. Analyses were stratified according to the presence or absence of a pathogenic variant in a sarcomere gene. The prevalence of HT, DM, and obesity (Ob) was 37, 10, and 21%, respectively. HT, DM, and Ob were associated with older age (P<0.001), less family history of HCM (HT and DM P<0.001), higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (P<0.001), atrial fibrillation (HT and DM P<0.001; Ob p = 0.03) and LV (left ventricular) diastolic dysfunction (HT and Ob P<0.001; DM P = 0.003). Stroke was more frequent in HT (P<0.001) and mutation-positive patients with DM (P = 0.02). HT and Ob were associated with higher provocable LV outflow tract gradients (HT P<0.001, Ob P = 0.036). LV hypertrophy was more severe in Ob (P = 0.018). HT and Ob were independently associated with NYHA class (OR 1.419, P = 0.017 and OR 1.584, P = 0.004, respectively). Other associations, including a higher proportion of females in HT and of systolic dysfunction in HT and Ob, were observed only in mutation-positive patients.

CONCLUSION

Common CVRF are associated with a more severe HCM phenotype, suggesting a proactive management of CVRF should be promoted. An interaction between genotype and CVRF was observed for some traits.

Preventing heart failure: a position paper of the Heart Failure Association in collaboration with the European Association of Preventive Cardiology

The heart failure epidemic is growing and its prevention, in order to reduce associated hospital readmission rates and its clinical and economic burden, is a key issue in modern cardiovascular medicine. The present position paper aims to provide practical evidence-based information to support the implementation of effective preventive measures. After reviewing the most common risk factors, an overview of the population attributable risks in different continents is presented, to identify potentially effective opportunities for prevention and to inform preventive strategies. Finally, potential interventions that have been proposed and have been shown to be effective in preventing heart failure are listed.

Burden of multimorbidity in a Polish cohort of ambulatory and hospitalized heart failure patients from 2 large European registry programs: prognostic implications

INTRODUCTION Individual comorbidities have been shown to adversely affect prognosis in heart failure (HF). However, our knowledge of multimorbidity in HF and understanding of its prognostic implications still remain incomplete. OBJECTIVES We aimed to analyze the prevalence of multimorbidity in Polish HF patients and to investigate the quantitative and qualitative impact of comorbidity burden on 12‑month outcomes in that population. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data of 1765 Polish patients with ambulatory or acute (requiring hospitalization) HF from 2 multicenter observational European Society of Cardiology registries: the ESC‑HF Pilot Survey (2009-2010) and ESC‑HF‑LT Registry (2011-2013). RESULTS Arterial hypertension and coronary artery disease were the most prevalent comorbidities, similarly to the entire European cohort. The great majority of HF patients had more than 1 predefined comorbidity and the most frequent number of comorbidities was 3. Importantly, in almost half of the patients, 4 or more comorbidities were reported. The best accuracy for predicting the adjusted 12‑month rate of all‑cause death was ensured by the model including only anemia and kidney dysfunction. The model including 4 comor-bidities-anemia, kidney dysfunction, diabetes, and coronary artery disease-provided best accuracy for predicting 12‑month rate of composite all‑cause death or HF hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS Multimorbidity is highly prevalent in a real‑world cohort of Polish HF patients and the quantitative burden of comorbidities is related to increased mortality. In such patients, the clinical profile characterized by pathophysiological continuum of diabetes, kidney dysfunction, and anemia is particularly associated with unfavorable outcomes.

Underuse of reperfusiontherapy in STEMI with cardiogenic shock. Results of the EORP ACVC EAPCI STEMI registry of the ESC

Aims

To determine the current state of the use of reperfusion and adjunctive therapies and in-hospital outcomes in ESC member and affiliated countries for patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS).

Methods and results

ESC EORP prospective international cohort study of admissions with STEMI within 24 hours of symptom onset (196 centers; 26 ESC member and 3 affiliated countries). Of 11462 patients enrolled, 448 (3.9%) had CS. Patients without compared to patients with CS, more frequently received primary PCI (72.5% versus 65.2%) and fibrinolysis (19.0 versus 15.9%) and less frequently had no reperfusion therapy (8.5% versus 19.0%). Mechanical support devices (IABP 11.2%, ECMO 0.7%, other 1.1%) were used infrequently in CS. BARC 2–5 bleeding complications (10.1% versus 3.0%, p&lt;0.01) and stroke (4.2% versus 0.9%, p&lt;0.01) occurred more frequently in patients with CS. In-hospital mortality was ten-fold higher (35.5% versus 3.1%) in patients with CS. Mortality in patients with CS in the groups with PCI, fibrinolysis and no reperfusion therapy were 27.4%, 36.6% and 62.4%, respectively.

Conclusions

In this multi-national registry patients with STEMI complicated by CS less frequently receive reperfusion therapy than patients with STEMI without CS. Early mortality in patients with CS not treated with primary PCI is very high. Therefore strategies to improve clinical outcome in STEMI with CS are needed.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): ESC EORP

Ablation strategies for different types of atrial fibrillation in Europe: results of the ESC-EORP EHRA Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Long-Term registry

AIMS

The ESC EORP EHRA Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Ablation Long-Term registry was designed to assess management and outcomes of AF catheter ablation procedures in Europe. To investigate the current ablation approaches and their outcomes for patients with paroxymal AF (PAF) and non-PAF in Europe.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from index ablations were collected in 27 European countries at 104 centres in a prospective fashion. Pre-procedural, procedural, and 1-year follow-up data were captured on a web-based electronic case record form. Data on the ablation procedure were available for 3446 patients. Of these, 2513 patients and 933 patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) or PVI plus (PVIplus) additional ablation, respectively. The ablation strategy was limited to PVI in 81% and 56% of patients in the PAF and non-PAF group, respectively (P < 0.001). In the non-PAF group, left atrial linear ablation and ablation of complex fragmented atrial electrograms were more commonly performed. Arrhythmias recurrence after PVI was 29% and 39% in the PAF and non-PAF group, respectively (P < 0.001) and 42% after PVIplus in both groups. Atrial fibrillation related hospital admissions were more common in the PVIplus group (20% vs. 14%). A very low procedural complication rate was observed. No relevant differences were observed with regard to repeat ablation (PVI 9% and PVIplus 11%).

CONCLUSION

In patients with PAF and non-PAF, the ablation strategies of PVI and PVIplus led to similar arrhythmia-free survival rates after 1 year. A considerable hospital readmission rate was noted.

Cervical re-injection of indocyanine green to improve sentinel lymph node detection in endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the role of cervical re-injection of indocyanine green (ICG) to increase the detection rate of sentinel lymph node (SLN) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) who underwent robotic-assisted surgical staging.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified consecutive EC patients undergoing robotic-assisted staging with SLN biopsy at our Institution between June 2016 and April 2020. Patients were excluded if they had open abdominal surgical approach, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and advanced stage [International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III-IV] at diagnosis. According to our SLN protocol, in case of either unilateral or no SLN detection, we performed an ipsilateral or bilateral cervical re-injection of ICG.

RESULTS

In total, 251 patients meeting inclusion criteria were included in the analysis. At first injection, bilateral detection was achieved in 184 (73.3%), unilateral detection in 57 (22.7%), and no detection in 10 (4.0%) patients. Cervical re-injection was performed in 51 of 67 patients with failed bilateral mapping. After cervical re-injection, bilateral detection rate increased to 94.5% (222/235), while unilateral and no detection were 5.1% (12/235) and 0.4% (1/235), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that cervical re-injection of ICG, in case of failed bilateral mapping of SLN, brings about a significant improvement in SLN detection rates, therefore reducing the number of side-specific required lymphadenectomies.

The ESC-EORP Chronic Ischaemic Cardiovascular Disease Long Term (CICD LT) registry

AIMS

The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) EURObservational Research Programme (EORP) Chronic Ischaemic Cardiovascular Disease Long Term (CICD LT) registry aims to study the clinical profile, treatment modalities, and outcomes of patients diagnosed with CICD in a contemporary environment in order to assess whether these patients at high cardiovascular (CV) risk are treated according to ESC guidelines on prevention or on stable coronary disease and to determine mid- and long-term outcomes and their determinants in this population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Nine thousand one hundred and seventy-four patients over 18 years with documented CICD defined by a history acute coronary syndrome with/without ST elevation, previous coronary revascularization, or stable coronary artery disease were enrolled between 1 May 2015 and 31 July 2018. Individual patient data on clinical profile, biology, and treatment modalities were collected across 154 centres from 20 ESC countries. Two years of follow-up is scheduled in order to determine the following clinical outcomes: all-cause and CV death, all-cause and CV hospitalizations, changes in medications, and quality of life using the EuroQol5D-5L score.

CONCLUSION

The CICD LT is an international registry of care and outcomes of patients hospitalized with CICD which will provide insights into the contemporary profile and management of patients with this common disease.

Genetic counselling and testing of adult patients with cardiomyopathies: insight from the EORP cardiomyopathy and myocarditis registry of the European Society of Cardiology

Introduction

Cardiomyopathies comprise a heterogeneous group of diseases, often of genetic origin.

Purpose

We assessed the current practice of genetic counselling and testing of adult cardiomyopathy patients in the prospective ESC EORP cardiomyopathy registry.

Methods

3 208 adult patients from sixty-nine centres in 18 countries were enrolled. Clinical data on genetic counselling and testing and on the presentation of cardiomyopathies were gathered.

Results

Genetic counselling was performed in 60.8% of all patients (75.4% in hypertrophic (HCM), 39.2% in dilated (DCM), 70.8% in arrhythmogenic right ventricular (ARVC) and 49.2% in restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM), p&lt;0.001). Comparing European geographical areas, genetic counselling was performed from 42.4% to 83.3% (p&lt;0.001). It was provided by a cardiologist (85.3%), geneticist (15.1%), genetic counsellor (11.3%), or a nurse (7.5%), (p&lt;0.001). Genetic testing was performed in 37.3% of all patients (48.8% in HCM, 18.6% in DCM, 55.6% % in ARVC and 43.6% in RCM, p&lt;0.001). Index patients with genetic testing were younger at diagnosis, had more familial disease, family history of sudden cardiac death or implanted cardioverter defibrillators but less comorbidities than those not tested (p&lt;0.001 for each comparison). At least 1 disease causing variant was found in 41.7% of index patients with genetic testing (43.3% in HCM, 33.3% in DCM, 51.4% in ARVC and 42.9% in RCM, p=0.13).

Conclusion

We report on the practice of genetic counselling and testing in cardiomyopathies in Europe. Genetic counselling and testing were performed in a substantial proportion of patients but less often than recommended by European guidelines, and much less in DCM than in HCM and ARVC, despite evidence for genetic background.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Poor attainment of blood pressure, lipids and diabetes targets in people at high cardiovascular risk in Europe: a report from the ESC-EORP EUROASPIRE V Survey in 16 European countries

Introduction

The EUROASPIRE V survey in primary care was carried out by the European Society of Cardiology, EURObservational Research Programme in 2017–2018 and investigated the risk factor management in patients at high cardiovascular (CVD) risk in16 European countries.

Purpose

To provide an audit the implementation of the 2016 Joint European Societies' guidelines on CVD prevention in people at high risk of developing CVD in primary care and to see whether the practice of preventive cardiology had improved by comparison with the previous EUROASPIRE IV survey in 2014–2015.

Methods

All patients were free of coronary or other atherosclerotic diseasebut considered at high CVD risk since they had been started on blood pressure and/or lipid and/or glucose lowering treatments. They were interviewed and examined by means of standardized methods ≥6 months after the start of therapy.

Results

2,759high CVD risk individuals (58% females), mean age 59 (SD 12) years, were interviewed and examined (participation rate 70%). The risk factor control was very poor, with less than half (47%) of patients on blood pressurelowering medication reaching the target of &lt;140/90 mmHg (&lt;140/85 mmHg in people with self-reported diabetes). Among treated dyslipidaemic patients only 47% attained LDL-cholesterol target of &lt;2.6 mmol/L. Among treated type 2 diabetic patients, 65% achieved the HbA1c target of &lt;7.0mmol/L. However, many patients on no antihypertensive or lipid-lowering medications had elevated blood pressure (43%) and elevated LDL-cholesterol (81%), respectively. The use of blood pressure lowering medication in people with hypertension was: ACE inhibitors/ARBs 79%, beta-blockers 37%, diuretics 36% and calcium channel blockers 32%; with 42% on one, 34% on two, 18% on three and 6% on ≥4 blood pressure lowering drugs. Among people on lipid-lowering medication, statins were prescribed in 97% and fibrates in 3%. Less than two-thirds of patients reported complete adherence with the intake of their blood pressure and lipid-lowering medications. The comparison with EUROASPIRE IV in the same centres that took part in both surveys showed no change in the BP management. There was a slight improvement in the control of LDL-cholesterol and glucose in patients with diabetes.

Conclusions

The results of EUROASPIRE V clearly demonstrate that the control of blood pressure, LDL-cholesterol and diabetes in patients at high CVD risk remains poor with large proportions not achieving the targets defined in the prevention guidelines. There is a considerable potential to raise the standards of preventive cardiology and to improve the management of patients at high CVD risk in Europe.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Other. Main funding source(s): European Society of Cardiology

Death, hospitalization, emergency department visits and out-patient visits in patients with heart failure in contemporary practice: results from the prospective Europeam 9069-patient ARIADNE registry

Background

In Europe, heart failure (HF) is managed in variable settings and frequently in office-based practice. In HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) there is now extensive evidence based therapy, but implementation is inconsistent, variable and overall inadequate. The Assessment of Real lIfe cAre –Describing EuropeaN hEart failure management (ARIADNE) registry aimed to assess in detail how outpatients with HFrEF are managed in Europe in contemporary practice.

Methods

ARIADNE was a prospective non-interventional registry of patients with HFrEF (NYHA class II-IV) treated by office-based cardiologists or selected primary care physicians (recognized as HF specialists) in a real world setting. Patients were enrolled in 687 centres in 17 European countries, and studied at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. Key pre-specified outcomes were deaths, hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and office visits, and their primary reasons.

Results

Over 20 months, we enrolled 9069 patients; median age 69 (19–96) years, 24% women, with 30% older than 75 years, 61% NYHA class II, with a median EF 35% (30–40%).

Over a median follow-up of 353 (1–631) days, 382 patients (4.3%) died, with 171 cardiovascular deaths (1.9%). The rates of total hospitalizations overall, for HF, and for non-HF cardiovascular reasons were 19.3, 8.1, and 4.8 per 100 patient years, respectively; and rates of emergency department visits overall, for HF reasons, and for non-HF CV reason were 7.7, 1.6, and 1.8, respectively. The number of HF office visits were on average 1.0 per patient.

Conclusions

In this large multinational HFrEF registry with detailed data on cause-specific outcomes and health care utilization, incidence of death was low and outpatient HF visits were few, but incidence of HF and CV hospitalization and emergency department visits was high.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis AG, Switzerland

Treatment with sacubitril/valsartan in European outpatients with chronic heart failure in Europe: results from ARIADNE registry

Background

Recently, the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) was introduced as a novel therapeutic option into European guidelines for the management of heart failure (HF). The Assessment of Real lIfe cAre –Describing EuropeaN hEart failure management (ARIADNE) registry provides real world information about its use and efficacy in real life in outpatients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in Europe.

Methods

ARIADNE was a prospective registry of patients with HFrEF (NYHA II-IV, reduced EF) treated by office-based cardiologists or selected primary care physicians (recognized as HF specialists) in a real world setting. 9069 HFrEF patients were enrolled from 674 investigators in 17 European countries, and followed over 12 months. Out of 8787 patients fulfilling criteria for analysis, 52.5% of the patients received S/V treatment at baseline, whereas 47.5% continued on their previous individualized heart failure medication. Results of S/V patients are reported here.

Results

The mean age of patients prescribed S/V was 67.3 years, mainly NYHA class II or III (49.7% and 48.2%, respectively), and mean LVEF of 32.7%. Common documented comorbidities were arterial hypertension (63.7%), coronary heart disease (62.4%), dyslipidemia (50.3%), diabetes (32.5%), and chronic kidney disease (24.1%).

Of the 4143 patients in the S/V group, 89.9% received S/V at baseline, 74.8% received S/V in combination with a β-blocker; 47.8% with a β-blocker and MRA.

Within 6 months of the observational period, 693 (17.4%) of the S/V patients were hospitalized, of which 46.8% and 28.7%, had HF related and non-HF cardiovascular (CV) hospitalizations. Emergency room visits without hospitalization were documented for 3.4% of S/V patients in the same time period; stroke and myocardial infarction occurred in 22 (0.5%) and 24 (0.6%) of the S/V patients, respectively. Cardiac catheterization or coronary angiography procedures were applied to 1.7% and 2.8% of the S/V patients. Total mortality was 4.3% (S/V 3.8%; non-S/V 5.0%), cardiovascular mortality 1.9% (S/V 1.8%; non-S/V 2.2%), during the 12 month observational period.

The proportion of S/V patients in NYHA class III or IV decreased in the course of the study from 44.6% to 24.0%. After 12 months of follow up, 46.3% of patients with NYHA class III had a reported improvement to NYHA class II. Consistently, mean LVEF increased to 37.9%. The percentage of S/V patients with LVEF &lt;22.5% decreased from 11.5% to 5.8%. KCCQ overall summary score increased by 1.9 points. An improvement of ≥5 points, denoting a clinically meaningful increase, was reported for 36.2% of S/V patients.

Conclusions

Data from the ARIADNE prospective registry portray a diverse, multinational study cohort receiving sacubitril/valsartan under real-world conditions. Throughout the study, symptoms and quality of life improved with the use of S/V.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis AG, Switzerland

Baseline characteristics and clinical features of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a European real-world, non-interventional registry study

Background

Heart failure (HF) is a major medical and economic burden that is often managed in office based practices. Recently, the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) was introduced as novel therapeutic option into European guidelines for the management of HF. The ARIADNE registry aims to provide information on how outpatients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are managed in Europe, in light of this novel treatment option.

Methods

ARIADNE was a prospective registry of patients with HFrEF treated by office-based cardiologists (OBC) or selected primary care physicians (recognized as HF specialists; PCP) in a real world setting. HFrEF patients were included prospectively, independently of whether treatment had been changed recently or not. 9069 patients were recruited from 687 centres in 17 European countries.

Results

The mean age of all patients was 68.1 years (S/V: 67.3 years, Non-S/V: 68.9 years). The majority of patients were in NYHA class II (61.3%), or NYHA class III (37.1%) overall, while more patients in the S/V group showed NYHA class III (S/V: 42.8%, Non-S/V: 30.9%). Mean LVEF was slightly lower in the S/V group than in the Non-S/V group (S/V: 32.7%, Non-S/V: 35.4%, overall 34.0%). The most frequently observed signs of HF were dyspnoea upon effort, followed by fatigue, palpitations on exertion at baseline. More patients tend to have more severe symptoms in the S/V groups (e.g. for dyspnoea on effort, Non-S/V: moderate 40.8%, severe 8.6%; S/V: moderate 46.4%, severe 14.1%). 44.0% of patients from the S/V group and 39.3% of non-S/V patients reported at least one hospitalization within 12 months prior to baseline, of which 73.3% in S/V and 69.9% in non-S/V patients were due to HF., At baseline, 44.7% of the patients used a CV device, of which most were implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD: Non-S/V 54.2%, S/V: 52.8%), implantable cardioverter defibrillator (CRT-ICD:Non-S/V 21.9%, S/V: 27.0%), and pacemaker (Non-S/V: 13.4%, S/V: 10.5%). The mean KCCQ overall summary score was 62.6 in the S/V group and 69.5 in the Non-S/V group at baseline.

83.9% of patients were treated with ARB or ACEi in Non-S/V group, (ACEi 57.3%, ARB 26.9%). The most frequently taken drug combinations in either group were ACEi/ ARB or S/V with β -blockers (Non-S/V 69.3%, S/V 67.3%). 40.2% in the Non-S/V group and 42.9% in S/V groups used a combination of ACEi/ARB or S/V, β-blocker and MRA.

Conclusions

The ARIADNE prospective registry provides insights and reflects variations in HF treatment practices in outpatients in Europe and the way S/V was introduced by OBCs and specialized PCPs in a real-world setting. In the observed population, S/V is more often prescribed to slightly younger patients with slightly lower LVEF, there was a greater observed percentage of S/V patients NYHA class III, with lower quality of life measurements and with more severe symptoms and recent hospitalizations for heart failure.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis Pharma AG

Measuring multimorbidity inequality across Italy through the multisource comorbidity score: a nationwide study

Background

Multimorbidity is a growing concern for healthcare systems, with many countries experiencing demographic transition to older population profiles. A simple multisource comorbidity score (MCS) has been recently developed and validated. A very large real-world investigation was conducted with the aim of measuring inequalities in the MCS distribution across Italy.

Methods

Beneficiaries of the Italian National Health Service aged 50–85 years who in 2018 were resident in one of the 10 participant regions formed the study population (15.7 million of the 24.9 million overall resident in Italy). MCS was assigned to each beneficiary by categorizing the individual sum of the comorbid values (i.e. the weights corresponding to the comorbid conditions of which the individual suffered) into one of the six categories denoting a progressive worsening comorbidity status. MCS distributions in women and men across geographic partitions were compared.

Results

Compared with beneficiaries from northern Italy, those from centre and south showed worse comorbidity profile for both women and men. MCS median age (i.e. the age above which half of the beneficiaries suffered at least one comorbidity) ranged from 60 (centre and south) to 68 years (north) in women and from 63 (centre and south) to 68 years (north) in men. The percentage of comorbid population was lower than 50% for northern population, whereas it was around 60% for central and southern ones.

Conclusion

MCS allowed of capturing geographic variability of multimorbidity prevalence, thus showing up its value for addressing health policy in order to guide national health planning.

Cardiovascular Death Risk in Recovered Mid-Range Ejection Fraction Heart Failure: Insights From Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test

BACKGROUND

Heart failure with midrange ejection fraction (HFmrEF) represents a heterogeneous category where phenotype, as well as prognostic assessment, remains debated. The present study explores a specific HFmrEF subset, namely those who recovered from a reduced EF (rec-HFmrEF) and, particularly, it focuses on the possible additive prognostic role of cardiopulmonary exercise testing.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed data from 4535 patients with HFrEF and 1176 patients with rec-HFmrEF from the Metabolic Exercise combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes database. The end point was cardiovascular death at 5 years. The median follow-up was 1343 days (25th-75th range 627-2403 days). Cardiovascular death occurred in 552 HFrEF and 61 rec-HFmrEF patients. The multivariate analysis confirmed an independent role of the MECKI score's variables in HFrEF (C-index = 0.744) whereas, in the rec-HFmrEF group, only age and peak oxygen uptake (pVO₂) remained associated to the end point (C-index = 0.745). A peak oxygen uptake of ≤55% of predicted and a ventilatory efficiency of ≥31 resulted as the most accurate cut-off values in the outcome prediction.

CONCLUSIONS

Present data support the cardiopulmonary exercise test and, particularly, the peak oxygen uptake, as a useful tool in the rec-HFmrEF prognostic assessment. A peak VO₂ of ≤55% predicted and ventilatory efficiency of ≥31 might help to identify a high-risk rec-HFmrEF subgroup.

[CoViD-19 and chronic diseases: current knowledge, future steps and the MaCroScopio project.]

Chronicity and comorbidity influence the risk of CoViD-19 infection and the course of the disease. Epidemiological data and studies performed show different rates of chronic diseases and multimorbidity among patients affected by CoViD-19 in the various countries and areas, but they consistently stress their impact on CoViD-19 infection. In order to protect chronic and frail patients, the Italian Medicines Agency has taken measures to extend the therapeutic plans and monitoring registers; hopefully, therapeutic plans for antidiabetics, drugs for respiratory diseases and oral anticoagulant drugs will be abolished since they do not offer any additional advantage in terms of appropriateness and traceability of outcomes. The MaCroScopio project (Observatory on Chronic Diseases), regarding the CoViD-19 emergency, has started a new research path to foster the integration of the administrative data flows with the CoViD-19 Registers for planning and research purposes in the context of chronicity, as well as to evaluate the economic and organizational impact of the pandemic.

Modeling defibrillation benefit for survival among cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator recipients

BACKGROUND

Patients with heart failure having a low expected probability of arrhythmic death may not benefit from implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs).

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to validate models to identify cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) candidates who may not require CRT devices with ICD functionality.

METHODS

Heart failure (HF) patients with CRT-Ds and non-CRT ICDs from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry and others with no device from 3 separate registries and 3 heart failure trials were analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression for survival with the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM; estimates overall mortality) and the Seattle Proportional Risk Model (SPRM; estimates proportional risk of arrhythmic death).

RESULTS

Among 60,185 patients (age 68.6 ± 11.3 years, 31.9% female) meeting CRT-D criteria, 38,348 had CRT-Ds, 11,389 had non-CRT ICDs, and 10,448 had no device. CRT-D patients had a prominent adjusted survival benefit (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.50-0.55, P < .0001 versus no device). CRT-D patients with SHFM-predicted 4-year survival ≥81% (median) and a low SPRM-predicted probability of an arrhythmic mode of death ≤42% (median) had an absolute adjusted risk reduction attributable to ICD functionality of just 0.95%/year with the majority of survival benefit (70%) attributable to CRT pacing. In contrast, CRT-D patients with SHFM-predicted survival <median or SPRM >median had substantially more ICD-attributable benefit (absolute risk reduction of 2.6%/year combined; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The SPRM and SHFM identified a quarter of real-world, primary prevention CRT-D patients with minimal benefit from ICD functionality. Further studies to evaluate CRT pacemakers in these low-risk CRT candidates are indicated.

Primary prevention efforts are poorly developed in people at high cardiovascular risk: A report from the European Society of Cardiology EURObservational Research Programme EUROASPIRE V survey in 16 European countries

BACKGROUND

European Action on Secondary and Primary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events (EUROASPIRE) V in primary care was carried out by the European Society of Cardiology EURObservational Research Programme in 2016-2018. The main objective was to determine whether the 2016 Joint European Societies' guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in people at high cardiovascular risk have been implemented in clinical practice.

METHODS

The method used was a cross-stional survey in 78 centres from 16 European countries. Patients without a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease either started on blood pressure and/or lipid and/or glucose lowering treatments were identified and interviewed ≥ 6 months after the start of medication.

RESULTS

A total of 3562 medical records were reviewed and 2759 patients (57.6% women; mean age 59.0 ± 11.6 years) interviewed (interview rate 70.0%). The risk factor control was poor with 18.1% of patients being smokers, 43.5% obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2) and 63.8% centrally obese (waist circumference ≥88 cm for women, ≥102 cm for men). Of patients on blood pressure lowering medication 47.0% reached the target of <140/90 mm Hg (<140/85 mm Hg in people with diabetes). Among treated dyslipidaemic patients only 46.9% attained low density lipoprotein-cholesterol target of <2.6 mmol/l. Among people treated for type 2 diabetes mellitus, 65.2% achieved the HbA1c target of <7.0%.

CONCLUSION

The primary care arm of the EUROASPIRE V survey revealed that large proportions of people at high cardiovascular disease risk have unhealthy lifestyles and inadequate control of blood pressure, lipids and diabetes. Thus, the potential to reduce the risk of future cardiovascular disease throughout Europe by improved preventive cardiology programmes is substantial.

Comparison between laparoscopy and laparotomy in the surgical re-staging of granulosa cell tumors of the ovary

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of laparoscopic (LPS) and laparotomic (LPT) re-staging in patients with incompletely surgically staged ovarian granulosa cell tumors (OGCT).

METHODS

We conducted a medical chart retrospective analysis of all patients with sex cord stromal tumors (SCSTs) who were managed in our division between March 1994 and March 2017. After a complete review of surgical and pathological notes, patients with incomplete staging were restaged according to the FIGO guidelines. Statistical analysis was conducted using Statistical Package version 20.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Illinois).

RESULTS

Out of a total of 170 patients SCSTs, 84 patients (49,5%) received primary surgery that included a hysterectomy; 86 patients (50,5%) underwent fertility-sparing surgery. Eighty-one patients (48%) with diagnosis of OGCT were incompletely surgically staged at another institution. We evaluated our results in terms of laparoscopic approach (56 patients) and open treatment (25 patients). Among the IA patient's group, 1 was upstaged to IIB stage and 2 to IIIB; among patients with IC stage, 1 was upstaged to IIA, 2 to IIB and 1 to IIIB stage. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to the upstaged patients with final stage IIB-IIIC. No statistically significant difference between laparoscopy and open-surgery was detected in terms of upstaged patients after second surgery (p = 0,36).

CONCLUSION

According to our series, laparoscopic restaging compared to the open approach seems to be a feasible and efficient technique to complete surgical staging in patients with GCTs incorrectly staged. Surgical restaging seems to upstage a considerable number of OGCT, mainly in the initial stage IC group of patients. However, the impact of restaging on final outcome and survival remains to be demonstrated.

Association of metabolic syndrome with non-thromboembolic adverse cardiac outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation

Aims

Evidence suggests an excess risk of non-thromboembolic major adverse cardiac events (MACE) associated with atrial fibrillation (AF), particularly in individuals free of overt coronary artery disease (CAD). Metabolic syndrome (MetS) increases cardiovascular risk in the general population, but less is known how it influences outcomes in AF patients. We aimed to assess whether MetS affects the risk of MACE in AF patients without overt CAD.

Methods and results

This prospective, observational study enrolled 843 AF patients (mean-age, 62.5 ± 12.1 years, 38.6% female) without overt CAD. Metabolic syndrome was defined according to the National Cholesterol Education Program. The 5-year composite MACE included myocardial infarction (MI), coronary revascularization, and cardiac death. Metabolic syndrome was present in 302 (35.8%) patients. At 5-year follow-up, 118 (14.0%) patients experienced MACE (2.80%/year). Metabolic syndrome conferred a multivariable adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 1.98 for MACE [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23-3.16; P = 0.004], and for individual outcomes: MI (aHR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.69-5.11; P < 0.001), revascularization (aHR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.40-3.87; P = 0.001), and cardiac death (aHR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.25-5.33; P = 0.011). Following the propensity score (PS)-adjustment for MetS, the association between MetS and MACE (PS-aHR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.21-3.01; P = 0.012), MI (PS-aHR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.54-5.00; P = 0.008), revascularization (PS-aHR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.69-3.11; P = 0.015), and cardiac death (PS-aHR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.14-5.11; P = 0.023) remained significant.

Conclusion

Metabolic syndrome is common in AF patients without overt CAD, and confers an independent, increased risk of MACE, including MI, coronary revascularization, and cardiac death. Given its prognostic implications, prevention and treatment of MetS may reduce the burden of non-thromboembolic complications in AF.

Stroke Outcomes in the COMPASS Trial

BACKGROUND

Strokes were significantly reduced by the combination of rivaroxaban plus aspirin in comparison with aspirin in the COMPASS trial (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies). We present detailed analyses of stroke by type, predictors, and antithrombotic effects in key subgroups.

METHODS

Participants had stable coronary artery or peripheral artery disease and were randomly assigned to receive aspirin 100 mg once daily (n=9126), rivaroxaban 5 mg twice daily (n=9117), or rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus aspirin (n=9152). Patients who required anticoagulation or had a stroke within 1 month, previous lacunar stroke, or intracerebral hemorrhage were excluded.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 23 months, fewer patients had strokes in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group than in the aspirin group (83 [0.9% per year] versus 142 [1.6% per year]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44-0.76; P<0.0001). Ischemic/uncertain strokes were reduced by nearly half (68 [0.7% per year] versus 132 [1.4% per year]; HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38-0.68; P<0.0001) by the combination in comparison with aspirin. No significant difference was noted in the occurrence of stroke in the rivaroxaban alone group in comparison with aspirin: annualized rate of 0.7% (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.65-1.05). The occurrence of fatal and disabling stroke (modified Rankin Scale, 3-6) was decreased by the combination (32 [0.3% per year] versus 55 [0.6% per year]; HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.37-0.89; P=0.01). Independent predictors of stroke were prior stroke, hypertension, systolic blood pressure at baseline, age, diabetes mellitus, and Asian ethnicity. Prior stroke was the strongest predictor of incident stroke (HR, 3.63; 95% CI, 2.65-4.97; P<0.0001) and was associated with a 3.4% per year rate of stroke recurrence on aspirin. The effect of the combination in comparison with aspirin was consistent across subgroups with high stroke risk, including those with prior stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin is an important new antithrombotic option for primary and secondary stroke prevention in patients with clinical atherosclerosis.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01776424.

Impact of monitoring on detection of arrhythmia recurrences in the ESC-EHRA EORP atrial fibrillation ablation long-term registry

AIMS

Monitoring of patients after ablation had wide variations in the ESC-EHRA atrial fibrillation ablation long-term (AFA-LT) registry. We aimed to compare four different monitoring strategies after catheter AF ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The ESC-EHRA AFA-LT registry included 3593 patients who underwent ablation. Arrhythmia monitoring during follow-up was performed by 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), Holter ECG, trans-telephonic ECG monitoring (TTMON), or an implanted cardiac monitoring (ICM) system. Patients were selected to a given monitoring group according to the most extensive ECG tool used in each of them. Comparison of the probability of freedom from recurrences was performed by censored log-rank test and presented by Kaplan-Meier curves. The rhythm monitoring methods were used among 2658 patients: ECG (N = 578), Holter ECG (N = 1874), TTMON (N = 101), and ICM (N = 105). A total of 767 of 2658 patients (28.9%) had AF recurrences during follow-up. Censored log-rank test discovered a lower probability of freedom from relapses, which was detected with ICM compared to TTMON, ECG, and Holter ECG (P < 0.001). The rate of freedom from AF recurrences was 50.5% among patients using the ICM while it was 65.4%, 70.6%, and 72.8% using the TTMON, ECG, and Holter ECG, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Comparing all main electrocardiographic monitoring methods in a large patient sample, our results suggest that post-ablation recurrences of AF are significantly underreported by TTMON, ECG, and Holter ECG. The ICM estimates AF ablation recurrences most reliably and should be a preferred mode of monitoring for trials evaluating novel AF ablation techniques.

Exercise oscillatory ventilation and prognosis in heart failure patients with reduced and mid-range ejection fraction

AIMS

Exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV) is a pivotal cardiopulmonary exercise test parameter for the prognostic evaluation of patients with chronic heart failure (HF). It has been described in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (<40%, HFrEF) and with HF with preserved ejection fraction (>50%, HFpEF), but no data are available for patients with HF with mid-range ejection fraction (40-49%, HFmrEF). The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic role of EOV in HFmrEF patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analysed 1239 patients with HFmrEF and 4482 patients with HFrEF, enrolled in the MECKI score database, with a 2-year follow-up. The study endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death, urgent heart transplant, and ventricular assist device implantation. We identified EOV in 968 cases (16% and 17% of cases in HFmrEF and HFrEF, respectively). HFrEF EOV+ patients were significantly older, and their parameters suggested a more severe HF than HFrEF EOV- patients. A similar behaviour was found in HFmrEF EOV+ vs. EOV- patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis, irrespective of ejection fraction, showed that EOV is associated with a worse survival, and that patients with HFrEF and HFmrEF EOV+ had a significantly worse outcome than the EOV- of the same ejection fraction groups. EOV-associated survival differences in HFmrEF patients started after 18 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Exercise oscillatory ventilation has a similar prevalence and ominous prognostic value in both HFmrEF and HFrEF patients, indicating a group of patients in need of a more intensive follow-up and a more aggressive therapy. In HFmrEF, the survival curves between EOV+ and EOV- patients diverged only after 18 months.

Big data from electronic health records for early and late translational cardiovascular research: challenges and potential

Aims

Cohorts of millions of people's health records, whole genome sequencing, imaging, sensor, societal and publicly available data present a rapidly expanding digital trace of health. We aimed to critically review, for the first time, the challenges and potential of big data across early and late stages of translational cardiovascular disease research.

Methods and results

We sought exemplars based on literature reviews and expertise across the BigData@Heart Consortium. We identified formidable challenges including: data quality, knowing what data exist, the legal and ethical framework for their use, data sharing, building and maintaining public trust, developing standards for defining disease, developing tools for scalable, replicable science and equipping the clinical and scientific work force with new inter-disciplinary skills. Opportunities claimed for big health record data include: richer profiles of health and disease from birth to death and from the molecular to the societal scale; accelerated understanding of disease causation and progression, discovery of new mechanisms and treatment-relevant disease sub-phenotypes, understanding health and diseases in whole populations and whole health systems and returning actionable feedback loops to improve (and potentially disrupt) existing models of research and care, with greater efficiency. In early translational research we identified exemplars including: discovery of fundamental biological processes e.g. linking exome sequences to lifelong electronic health records (EHR) (e.g. human knockout experiments); drug development: genomic approaches to drug target validation; precision medicine: e.g. DNA integrated into hospital EHR for pre-emptive pharmacogenomics. In late translational research we identified exemplars including: learning health systems with outcome trials integrated into clinical care; citizen driven health with 24/7 multi-parameter patient monitoring to improve outcomes and population-based linkages of multiple EHR sources for higher resolution clinical epidemiology and public health.

Conclusion

High volumes of inherently diverse (‘big’) EHR data are beginning to disrupt the nature of cardiovascular research and care. Such big data have the potential to improve our understanding of disease causation and classification relevant for early translation and to contribute actionable analytics to improve health and healthcare.

4329Mega-studies in heart failure, effect dilution in examination of new therapies

Aims

All phase 3 studies in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have failed in the last decades. We explore the likelihood that the negative results are due to chance and/or to study size and dilution of statistical power.

Methods and results

First, using simulations, we examined the probability that a positive finding in phase 2 would result in studying truly effective drugs in phase 3. We simulated phase 2 studies under six scenarios where the range of true relative risk (RR) for an outcome of interest varied from 0.5 (major benefit) to 1.15 (some harm). The proportion of simulated studies where the RR <0.8 (we assumed that a 20% or greater risk reduction reflects an effective drug) ranged from 6% to 42% across the six scenarios studied. To further simulate “real life” clinical research, we simulated a continuous surrogate outcome that was linearly related to the true RR in each simulation of each scenario. Regardless of criteria considered for a positive phase 2 trial, results suggest that even in our worst-case scenario, where overall only 6% of drugs taken into phase 2 are effective, roughly 20% of phase 3 studies, if appropriately powered, should have yielded positive results. Given this, we then explored study size in AHF research, as a potential explanation for the high failure rate in these studies. Comparison of published phase 2 and 3 clinical trials with registries in AHF suggest that populations in both large and small trials differ from “real life”. Meta-regression models suggest that both control event rates, and in the serelaxin program as an example, treatment effects, decline with increasing study size greatly reducing power (figure). This effect dilution might be explained by an increasing proportion of patients enrolled in studies who cannot benefit from the study drug.

Figure 1. Power at two-sided 0.05 significance level to detect an effect size of hazard ratio of 0.65 (left) or 0.8 (right) with a placebo event rate of 10% (top) and 20% (bottom) at N=100 at various treatment effect dilutions with increasing sample size.

Conclusion

These data suggest that it is unlikely that the very high rate of negative AHF phase III trials can be explained by chance alone. Potentially, our tendency to increase sample size does not necessarily increase statistical power, due to more heterogenous populations leading to reduced event rates and treatment effects.

P3424Gender differences in the implementation of CVD prevention In patients with coronary disease: Results from the EUROASPIRE V Survey

Introduction

EUROASPIRE V was a cross-sectional survey carried out by the European Society of Cardiology, EURObservational Research Programme in 2016–2017 in 27 European countries

Purpose

To describe gender differences in lifestyle and risk factor management, and the use of cardioprotective drug therapies in patients with coronary heart disease in Europe.

Methods

Patients <80 years with coronary disease (CABG, PCI or an acute coronary syndrome) were identified from the hospital medical records and interviewed and examined by trained staff ≥6 months and ≤2 years later using standardized methods including central laboratory measurements.

Results

A total of 8,261 (25.8% females), mean age 63.6 (SD 9.6) were interviewed, with a median time between the index event and interview 1.12 years (IR 0.82–1.56). Women were older (mean age 65.4 years [SD 9.2] vs 63.0 [9.7] and had a lower level of education than men.Comparing women with men, the prevalence of the risk factors were as follows: current smoking 12.8% vs 20.7%,obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) 45.7% vs 34.9%, central obesity (waist circumference ≥102 cm in men or ≥88 cm in women) 78.0% vs 51.8%, raised blood pressure (BP ≥140/90 mmHg, ≥140/80 mmHg in patients with diabetes) 47.1% vs 46.0%, elevated LDL-cholesterol (≥1.8 mmol/l) 77.9% vs 68.5% and self reported diabetes 33.1% vs 28.0%. Reported use of prophylactic drug therapies for the same comparison was: antiplatelets 91.8% vs. 92.8%; beta-blockers 81.8% vs. 80.8%; ACE inhibitors/ARBs 75.0% vs. 75.3%; and statins 76.8% vs. 82.2%. The therapeutic control of blood pressure, LDL-cholesterol and diabetes (HbA1c <7 mmol/L) was: 48.2% vs 49.9%; 25.7% vs 34.1% and 48.5% vs 56.7%, respectively.

Conclusions

The results show that women with coronary disease have higher prevalence of obesity, central obesity, elevated LDL-cholesterol and self-reported diabetes than men. There were no differences in terms of blood pressure management. All coronary patients require professional support to make lifestyle changes and manage risk factors more effectivelyin order to reduce their risk of recurrent cardiovascular events.

Acknowledgement/Funding

ESC-EORP supported by Amgen, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Sanofi, Ferrer and Novo Nordisk

P3784Impact of progressively impaired renal function on major adverse outcomes in European patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the ESC EORP-AF long-term general registry

Background

Renal function is an important predictor of major adverse outcomes in the general population. In the setting of atrial fibrillation (AF), renal dysfunction may act both as a risk factor and a proxy of vascular risk factors and comorbidities.

Methods

We analyzed the association of renal function, as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the CKD-EPI formula, with 1-year outcomes in a “real-world” cohort of European AF patients from the EORP-AF Long-Term General Registry.

Results

7725 were available for this analysis. Of these, 1294 (16.7%) had normal renal function (≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2), 3848 (49.8%) mildly reduced renal function (60–89 mL/min/1.73 m2), 2311 (29.9%) moderately reduced renal function (30–59 mL/min/1.73 m2) and 272 (3.5%) severely reduced renal function (<30 mL/min/1.73 m2). CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores values increased across eGFR strata (p<0.0001). Among patients qualifying for oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy, those with severely impaired renal function were less often prescribed with any OAC (79.8%, p<0.0001), more likely with vitamin K antagonist (62.9%) than non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (16.9%) (p<0.0001). At 1-year follow-up the rates of any thromboembolic event (TE)/acute coronary syndrome (ACS)/cardiovascular (CV) death progressively increased with worsening renal function, up to 20.7% in patients with severe dysfunction (p<0.0001). Rates of CV death and all-cause death were higher in severe renal dysfunction (16.9% and 21.3%; p<0.0001). Cox regression analysis (adjusted for known predictors) showed that eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2, compared to normal renal function was associated with an increased risk of all the adverse outcomes (Table). eGFR decrease by 10 mL/min/1.73 m2 was associated with increased risks (Table).

Any TE/ACS/CV Death CV Death All-Cause Death mL/min/1.73 m2 HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) eGFR ≥90 (ref.) – – – eGFR 60–89 0.99 (0.67–1.46) 0.81 (0.44–1.51) 0.74 (0.47–1.19) eGFR 30–50 1.12 (0.74–1.69) 1.00 (0.53–1.89) 0.95 (0.59–1.54) eGFR <30 2.47 (1.52–3.99) 2.73 (1.36–5.49) 2.16 (1.25–3.72) eGFR (by 10 mL/min/1.73 m2 decrease) 1.11 (1.05–1.17) 1.18 (1.10–1.27) 1.11 (1.03–1.18) ACS = Acute coronary syndrome; CI = Confidence interval; CV = Cardiovascular; eGFR = estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate; HR = Hazard ratio; TE = Thromboembolic event.

Conclusions

In AF patients, impaired renal function at baseline is associated with a progressive increase in the risk of major adverse outcomes during follow up. Severe renal dysfunction is an independent predictor of all the adverse outcomes.

P334Prospective FU in various subtypes of cardiomyopathies: insights from the EORP Cardiomyopathy Registry of the ESC

Background

The EORP Cardiomyopathy Registry is a prospective, observational, multinational registry of consecutive patients with cardiomyopathies. The objective of this report is to describe the outcomes at one year of follow-up of adult patients (>18 years old) enrolled in the registry.

Methods

A total of 3,208 patients (median age: 55.0 (43.0; 64.0) years, males: 65.1%) were recruited at baseline. Follow-up data at 1 year were obtained in 2,713 patients (84.6%), including 1,420 with hypertrophic (HCM), 1,105 dilated (DCM), 128 arrhythmogenic right ventricular (ARVC) and 60 restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM).

Results

Improvement of symptoms (NYHA, chest pain, syncope) was globally observed over time (p<0.001 for each). Additional invasive therapeutics were performed during follow-up: implantation of ICD (primary prevention) (N=109 patients, 5.2%), pacemaker (N=28, 1.2%), heart transplant (N=30, 1,1%), ablation for atrial or ventricular arrhythmia (0.5% & 0.1%). The proportion of patients with history of AF increased from baseline to FU in 3.6% (from 28.2% to 31.8%). ICD therapy at 1 year was delivered more frequently in ARVC then in DCM, HCM and RCM (11.4%, 9.0%; 8.1%, 0% respectively for primary prevention). Major cardiovascular events (MACE) occurred in 29.3% of RCM, 10.5% of DCM, 7.9% of ARVC and 5.3% of HCM. MACE were globally higher in index patients compared to relatives (10.8% vs 4.4%, p<0.001).

When considering geographical areas, MACE were higher in East Europe (13.1%) and lower in South Europe (5.3%) (univariate); heart transplant was higher in West Europe (2.40%) and lower in South Europe (0.25%) (univariate).

Conclusions

Despite symptomatic improvement in most cases, there is still a significant burden of arrhythmic and heart failure events in patients with cardiomyopathies. Outcomes were different not only according to cardiomyopathy subtypes but also in relatives versus index patients.

Acknowledgement/Funding

None

Contemporary Presentation and Management of Valvular Heart Disease: The EURObservational Research Programme Valvular Heart Disease II Survey

BACKGROUND

Valvular heart disease (VHD) is an important cause of mortality and morbidity and has been subject to important changes in management. The VHD II survey was designed by the EURObservational Research Programme of the European Society of Cardiology to analyze actual management of VHD and to compare practice with guidelines.

METHODS

Patients with severe native VHD or previous valvular intervention were enrolled prospectively across 28 countries over a 3-month period in 2017. Indications for intervention were considered concordant if the intervention was performed or scheduled in symptomatic patients, corresponding to Class I recommendations specified in the 2012 European Society of Cardiology and in the 2014 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology VHD guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 7247 patients (4483 hospitalized, 2764 outpatients) were included in 222 centers. Median age was 71 years (interquartile range, 62-80 years); 1917 patients (26.5%) were ≥80 years; and 3416 were female (47.1%). Severe native VHD was present in 5219 patients (72.0%): aortic stenosis in 2152 (41.2% of native VHD), aortic regurgitation in 279 (5.3%), mitral stenosis in 234 (4.5%), mitral regurgitation in 1114 (21.3%; primary in 746 and secondary in 368), multiple left-sided VHD in 1297 (24.9%), and right-sided VHD in 143 (2.7%). Two thousand twenty-eight patients (28.0%) had undergone previous valvular intervention. Intervention was performed in 37.0% and scheduled in 26.8% of patients with native VHD. The decision for intervention was concordant with Class I recommendations in symptomatic patients with severe single left-sided native VHD in 79.4% (95% CI, 77.1-81.6) for aortic stenosis, 77.6% (95% CI, 69.9-84.0) for aortic regurgitation, 68.5% (95% CI, 60.8-75.4) for mitral stenosis, and 71.0% (95% CI, 66.4-75.3) for primary mitral regurgitation. Valvular interventions were performed in 2150 patients during the survey; of them, 47.8% of patients with single left-sided native VHD were in New York Heart Association class III or IV. Transcatheter procedures were performed in 38.7% of patients with aortic stenosis and 16.7% of those with mitral regurgitation.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite good concordance between Class I recommendations and practice in patients with aortic VHD, the suboptimal number in mitral VHD and late referral for valvular interventions suggest the need to improve further guideline implementation.

The ESC-EORP EURO-ENDO (European Infective Endocarditis) registry

AIMS

The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) EURObservational Research Programme (EORP) European Endocarditis (EURO-ENDO) registry aims to study the care and outcomes of patients diagnosed with infective endocarditis (IE) and compare findings with recommendations from the 2015 ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of IE and data from the 2001 Euro Heart Survey.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients (n = 3116) aged over 18 years with a diagnosis of IE based on the ESC 2015 IE diagnostic criteria were prospectively identified between 1 January 2016 and 31 March 2018. Individual patient data were collected across 156 centres and 40 countries. The primary endpoint is all-cause mortality in hospital and at 1 year. Secondary endpoints are 1-year morbidity (all-cause hospitalization, any cardiac surgery, and IE relapse), the clinical, epidemiological, microbiological, and therapeutic characteristics of patients, the number and timing of non-invasive imaging techniques, and adherence to recommendations as stated in the 2015 ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of IE.

CONCLUSION

EURO-ENDO is an international registry of care and outcomes of patients hospitalized with IE which will provide insights into the contemporary profile and management of patients with this challenging disease.

Recommendations for a standardised educational program in robot assisted gynaecological surgery: Consensus from the Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS)

BACKGROUND

The Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS) aims at developing a European consensus on core components of a curriculum for training and assessment in robot assisted gynaecological surgery.

METHODS

A Delphi process was initiated among a panel of 12 experts in robot assisted surgery invited through the SERGS. An online questionnaire survey was based on a literature search for standards in education in gynaecological robot assisted surgery. The survey was performed in three consecutive rounds to reach optimal consensus. The results of this survey were discussed by the panel and led to consensus recommendations on 39 issues, adhering to general principles of medical education.

RESULTS

On review there appeared to be no accredited training programs in Europe, and few in the USA. Recommendations for requirements of training centres, educational tools and assessment of proficiency varied widely. Stepwise and structured training together with validated assessment based on competencies rather than on volume emerged as prerequisites for adequate and safe learning. An appropriate educational environment and tools for training were defined. Although certification should be competence based, the panel recommended additional volume based criteria for both accreditation of training centres and certification of individual surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

Consensus was reached on minimum criteria for training in robot assisted gynaecological surgery. To transfer results into clinical practice, experts recommended a curriculum and guidelines that have now been endorsed by SERGS to be used to establish training programmes for robot assisted surgery.

Lifestyle and impact on cardiovascular risk factor control in coronary patients across 27 countries: Results from the European Society of Cardiology ESC-EORP EUROASPIRE V registry

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine whether the Joint European Societies guidelines on secondary cardiovascular prevention are followed in everyday practice.

Design

A cross-sectional ESC-EORP survey (EUROASPIRE V) at 131 centres in 81 regions in 27 countries.

Methods

Patients (<80 years old) with verified coronary artery events or interventions were interviewed and examined ≥6 months later.

Results

A total of 8261 patients (females 26%) were interviewed. Nineteen per cent smoked and 55% of them were persistent smokers, 38% were obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2), 59% were centrally obese (waist circumference: men ≥102 cm; women ≥88 cm) while 66% were physically active <30 min 5 times/week. Forty-two per cent had a blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg (≥140/85 if diabetic), 71% had low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥1.8 mmol/L (≥70 mg/dL) and 29% reported having diabetes. Cardioprotective medication was: anti-platelets 93%, beta-blockers 81%, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers 75% and statins 80%.

Conclusion

A large majority of coronary patients have unhealthy lifestyles in terms of smoking, diet and sedentary behaviour, which adversely impacts major cardiovascular risk factors. A majority did not achieve their blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and glucose targets. Cardiovascular prevention requires modern preventive cardiology programmes delivered by interdisciplinary teams of healthcare professionals addressing all aspects of lifestyle and risk factor management, in order to reduce the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events.