Association between common cardiovascular risk factors and clinical phenotype in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) EurObservational Research Programme (EORP) Cardiomyopathy/Myocarditis registry

AIMS

The interaction between common cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is poorly studied. We sought to explore the relation between CVRF and the clinical characteristics of patients with HCM enrolled in the EURObservational Research Programme (EORP) Cardiomyopathy registry.

METHODS AND RESULTS

1739 patients with HCM were studied. The relation between hypertension (HT), diabetes (DM), body mass index (BMI), and clinical traits was analysed. Analyses were stratified according to the presence or absence of a pathogenic variant in a sarcomere gene. The prevalence of HT, DM, and obesity (Ob) was 37, 10, and 21%, respectively. HT, DM, and Ob were associated with older age (P<0.001), less family history of HCM (HT and DM P<0.001), higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (P<0.001), atrial fibrillation (HT and DM P<0.001; Ob p = 0.03) and LV (left ventricular) diastolic dysfunction (HT and Ob P<0.001; DM P = 0.003). Stroke was more frequent in HT (P<0.001) and mutation-positive patients with DM (P = 0.02). HT and Ob were associated with higher provocable LV outflow tract gradients (HT P<0.001, Ob P = 0.036). LV hypertrophy was more severe in Ob (P = 0.018). HT and Ob were independently associated with NYHA class (OR 1.419, P = 0.017 and OR 1.584, P = 0.004, respectively). Other associations, including a higher proportion of females in HT and of systolic dysfunction in HT and Ob, were observed only in mutation-positive patients.

CONCLUSION

Common CVRF are associated with a more severe HCM phenotype, suggesting a proactive management of CVRF should be promoted. An interaction between genotype and CVRF was observed for some traits.

Value of a comprehensive exercise echocardiography assessment for patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Background

Exercise echocardiography (ExE) may assess left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function, LV outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction and mitral regurgitation (MR). We aimed to assess the feasibility and prognostic value of the assessment of all these issues during exercise in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).

Methods

LV systolic and diastolic function, LVOT gradients, and MR were evaluated during ExE in 285 patients with HCM (age 60±14 years, 168 men) and preserved LVEF (≥50%). Recordings were obtained at rest and peak exercise for regional/global LV systolic function and at rest and within 1.5 min after exercise for the rest of assessments: LVOT gradients, MR and ratio of early LV inflow velocity to early tissue Doppler septal annulus velocity (E/e').

Results

Feasibility was 100%, 97%, 98% and 98% for LV systolic function, E/e', LVOT gradients, and MR assessments at exercise, respectively. Thirty-seven patients (13%) had LVOT obstruction at rest, and 76 (27%) developed exercise-induced LVOT obstruction. Mean resting LVEF was 63±3%. New wall motion abnormalities (WMAs) were detected in 38 patients (13%). E/e'&gt;15 was observed in 108 patients at rest (38%) and in 119 at exercise (42%). Corresponding figures for significant MR (moderate or severe) were 20 (7%) and 17 (6%). During follow-up of 3.9±2.5 years, 21 patients had a hard event (cardiac death or transplantation, appropriate discharge of a defibrillator, stroke, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for heart failure), 33 a combined event (hard plus new atrial fibrillation or syncope), and 53 a combined event plus any interventionism.

After adjustment, LV wall thickness, resting LVEF, maximal workload in Metabolic Equivalents (METs), and E/e' post-exercise resulted independent predictors of hard events (HR=1.45, 95% CI: 1.21–1.74, p&lt;0.001; HR=0.80, CI: 0.71–0.89, p&lt;0.001; HR=0.73, 95% CI: 0.62–0.86, p&lt;0.001; HR=1.08, 95% CI: 1.02–1.14, p&lt;0.009, respectively). Independent predictors of combined events included also LV wall thickness, resting LVEF, and METs, along with therapy with beta-blockers at the time of ExE (HR=1.29, 95% CI: 1.12–1.50, p=0.001; HR=0.89, CI: 0.81–0.97, p=0.012; HR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.74–0.93, p=0.001; HR=2.51, 95% CI: 1.20–5.25, p=0.015), whereas the model for combined events+any interventionism consisted of beta-blockers, LV wall thickness, LA dimension, METs and new WMAs. (HR=2.15, 95% CI: 1.20–3.86, p=0.01; HR=1.17, 95% CI: 1.03–1.32, p=0.02; HR=1.07, CI: 1.02–1.11, p=0.005; HR=0.90, 95% CI: 0.82–0.98, p=0.01; HR=2.33, 95% CI: 1.17–4.63, p=0.016)

Conclusions

A comprehensive assessment during ExE is feasible for patients with HCM and provides significant incremental prognostic information

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None