Long-term safety and efficacy of anacetrapib in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease

AIMS

REVEAL was the first randomized controlled trial to demonstrate that adding cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor therapy to intensive statin therapy reduced the risk of major coronary events. We now report results from extended follow-up beyond the scheduled study treatment period.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 30 449 adults with prior atherosclerotic vascular disease were randomly allocated to anacetrapib 100 mg daily or matching placebo, in addition to open-label atorvastatin therapy. After stopping the randomly allocated treatment, 26 129 survivors entered a post-trial follow-up period, blind to their original treatment allocation. The primary outcome was first post-randomization major coronary event (i.e. coronary death, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization) during the in-trial and post-trial treatment periods, with analysis by intention-to-treat. Allocation to anacetrapib conferred a 9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3-15%; P = 0.004] proportional reduction in the incidence of major coronary events during the study treatment period (median 4.1 years). During extended follow-up (median 2.2 years), there was a further 20% (95% CI 10-29%; P < 0.001) reduction. Overall, there was a 12% (95% CI 7-17%, P < 0.001) proportional reduction in major coronary events during the overall follow-up period (median 6.3 years), corresponding to a 1.8% (95% CI 1.0-2.6%) absolute reduction. There were no significant effects on non-vascular mortality, site-specific cancer, or other serious adverse events. Morbidity follow-up was obtained for 25 784 (99%) participants.

CONCLUSION

The beneficial effects of anacetrapib on major coronary events increased with longer follow-up, and no adverse effects emerged on non-vascular mortality or morbidity. These findings illustrate the importance of sufficiently long treatment and follow-up duration in randomized trials of lipid-modifying agents to assess their full benefits and potential harms.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 48678192; ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT01252953; EudraCT No. 2010-023467-18.

Impact of adverse events on quality of life and hospital costs in secondary cardiovascular disease prevention

Background and purpose

People with atherosclerotic vascular disease remain at high risk of cardiovascular (CVD) events despite effective risk factor management 1. There is little research on impacts of adverse events on quality of life (QoL) and hospital cost to inform evaluations of novel interventions in this population. We estimate QoL and annual hospital costs associated with a range of adverse events of interests using the individual participant data from the Randomized Evaluation of the Effects of Anacetrapib through Lipid Modification (REVEAL) trial.

Methods

Data from the 30,449 participants with atherosclerotic vascular disease receiving effective statin therapy in REVEAL, were used to estimate regression models for participants' hospital costs and QoL using participants' characteristics at entry (socio-demographic, clinical, prior diseases and treatments) and time-updated adverse events. We estimate costs and QoL in the year of an event, and in subsequent years, using stepwise covariate selection (p-value &lt;0.01). Standard errors were adjusted for clustering of participant annual costs.

Hospital episodes were costed (2019 UK£) using the UK Healthcare Resource Groups reference costs 2. One- and two-part generalized linear regression models (GLMs) for annual hospital costs (part 1: logistic model for estimating probability of incurring cost, part 2: GLM with Gaussian, Poisson or Gamma distributions with identity or log links for estimating costs, conditional on incurring any) were compared.

EQ-5D-5L questionnaires, completed by study participants at entry and final follow-up visits in the study, were mapped into QoL utility scores 3. QoL utility at final follow-up was used to estimate QoL decrements of adverse events using GLM linear model and adjusting for QoL at entry in addition to other participants characteristics.

Results

The two-part model with gamma distribution and identity link, indicated by specification tests and model fit statistics, was selected for modelling annual hospital costs (Figure 1). Non-haemorrhagic stroke, non-coronary revascularization, coronary revascularization and incident cancer were associated with highest hospital costs. The QoL model (Figure 2) indicated large QoL decrements associated with non-fatal non-haemorrhagic stroke, heart failure hospitalization, incident cancer and non-coronary revascularization, and comparatively small QoL decrement associated with experiencing non-fatal myocardial infarction.

Conclusion

These cost and QoL models in a well-managed contemporary high CVD risk patient population would assist in assessments of long-term net effects and cost-effectiveness of novel interventions to reduce cardiovascular risk.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): Merck Sharp & Dohme and UK Medical Research Council Figure 1Figure 2

A decade of the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative: What have we accomplished? What have we learned?

The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative reflects on 10 years of working to improve the quality and efficiency of clinical trials. This article highlights many of the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative’s accomplishments and offers examples of the impact that the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative has had on the clinical trials enterprise. After conducting more than 25 projects and issuing recommendations for specific strategies to improve the design and execution of clinical trials, some common themes and lessons learned have emerged. Lessons include the importance of engaging many stakeholders, advanced planning to address critical issues, discontinuation of non-value added practices, and new opportunities presented by technology. Through its work, the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative has also derived some operational best practices for conducting collaborative, multi-stakeholder projects covering project selection, project team dynamics and execution, and multi-stakeholder meetings and team discussions. Through these initiatives, the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative has helped move the needle toward needed change in the clinical trials enterprise that has directly impacted stakeholders and patients alike.

Testing the practical aspects of therapeutics by objective structured clinical examination

Medical students need to have a sound theoretical knowledge of pharmacology and a training in the practical aspects of therapeutics in order to prescribe effectively, safely and rationally when they qualify. Students have traditionally sat written exams and the practical aspects have been largely ignored. At the University of Birmingham we set up an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) style examination to test the practical aspects of therapeutics. Over the last 2 years, 434 students have been examined in this way to determine competency in various clinical skills including, for example prescription writing, the drawing up and giving of injections, setting up nebulizers, and patient counselling about drug effects. Over that time we found the therapeutics OSCE to be feasible and useful. It has demonstrated serious practical deficiencies that were not apparent from written examinations in some students' ability to prescribe and administer drugs. Since its introduction, performance in the OSCE has improved. Whether this will result in safer and more effective prescribing in the preregistration house officer year has not been formally evaluated but it appears that they approach this aspect of patient care with greater confidence than graduates from other schools.