Uses and limitations of high dose dipyridamole stress echocardiography for evaluation of coronary artery disease

Association between residential greenness and incident delirium: A prospective cohort study in the UK Biobank

BACKGROUND

Contemporary environmental health investigations have identified green space as an emerging factor with promising prospects for bolstering human well-being. The incidence of delirium increases significantly with age and is fatal. To date, there is no research elucidating the enduring implications of green spaces on the occurrence of delirium. Therefore, we explored the relationship between residential greenness and the incidence of delirium in a large community sample from the UK Biobank.

METHODS

Enrollment of participants spanned from 2006 to 2010. Assessment of residential greenness involved the land coverage percentage of green space within a buffer range of 300 m and 1000 m. The relationship between residential greenness and delirium was assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Further, we investigated the potential mediating effects of physical activity, particulate matter (PM) with diameters ≤2.5 (PM2.5), and nitrogen oxides (NOx).

RESULTS

Of 232,678 participants, 3722 participants were diagnosed with delirium during a 13.4-year follow-up period. Compared with participants with green space coverage at a 300 m buffer in the lowest quartile (Q1), those in the highest quartile (Q4) had 15 % (Hazard ratio [HR] = 0.85, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.77, 0.94) lower risk of incident delirium. As for the 1000 m buffer, those in Q4 had a 16 % (HR = 0.84, 95 % CI: 0.76, 0.93) lower risk of incident delirium. The relationship between green space in the 300 m buffer and delirium was mediated partially by physical activity (2.07 %) and PM2.5(49.90 %). Comparable findings were noted for the green space percentage within the 1000 m buffer.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results revealed that long-term exposure to residential greenness was related to a lower risk of delirium. Air pollution and physical activity exerted a significant mediating influence in shaping this association.

Comparison of exercise electrocardiography, technetium-99m sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography, and dobutamine and dipyridamole echocardiography for detection of coronary artery disease in hypertensive women

To assess the performance of currently used stress tests for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) in a series of female hypertensive patients. We performed exercise electrocardiography (ECG), technetium-99m sestamibi (MIBI) single photon emission computed tomography, dobutamine and dipyridamole echocardiography, and coronary angiography in 76 hypertensive women. Of the 76 study patients, 31 (41%) had significant CAD. The sensitivity of exercise ECG (81%), MIBI scanning (90%), and dobutamine echocardiography (87%) was greater than that of dipyridamole echocardiography (61%). This finding resulted from the lower sensitivity of dipyridamole echocardiography in the detection of single-vessel CAD (47% vs 76%, 88%, and 82% for the other 3 methods). In contrast, the sensitivity of the 4 tests was similar in the detection of multivessel CAD. The specificity of exercise ECG (56%) and MIBI scanning (53%) was less than that of dobutamine (82%, both p <0.01) and dipyridamole (91%, both p <0.001) echocardiography. This finding related to the lower specificity of exercise ECG in patients with either left ventricular hypertrophy or ST-T abnormalities at rest compared to the specificity in patients without these disorders (33% vs 89%, p <0.01). A lower MIBI scan specificity was found only in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (31% vs 66%, p <0.05). The overall accuracy of dobutamine echocardiography reached 84% compared to exercise ECG (66%, p <0.01), MIBI scan (68%, p <0.05), and dipyridamole echocardiography (79%, p <0.05). In conclusion, dobutamine echocardiography yielded satisfactory diagnostic accuracy for identifying CAD in hypertensive women. Although dipyridamole echocardiography had the greatest specificity, it might be limited in detecting mild CAD. Both exercise ECG and MIBI scanning had fare sensitivity; however, our findings limit the usefulness of these 2 tests in unselected patients.

Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC)

Stress echocardiography is the combination of 2D echocardiography with a physical, pharmacological or electrical stress. The diagnostic end point for the detection of myocardial ischemia is the induction of a transient worsening in regional function during stress. Stress echocardiography provides similar diagnostic and prognostic accuracy as radionuclide stress perfusion imaging, but at a substantially lower cost, without environmental impact, and with no biohazards for the patient and the physician. Among different stresses of comparable diagnostic and prognostic accuracy, semisupine exercise is the most used, dobutamine the best test for viability, and dipyridamole the safest and simplest pharmacological stress and the most suitable for combined wall motion coronary flow reserve assessment. The additional clinical benefit of myocardial perfusion contrast echocardiography and myocardial velocity imaging has been inconsistent to date, whereas the potential of adding - coronary flow reserve evaluation of left anterior descending coronary artery by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography adds another potentially important dimension to stress echocardiography. New emerging fields of application taking advantage from the versatility of the technique are Doppler stress echo in valvular heart disease and in dilated cardiomyopathy. In spite of its dependence upon operator's training, stress echocardiography is today the best (most cost-effective and risk-effective) possible imaging choice to achieve the still elusive target of sustainable cardiac imaging in the field of noninvasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

A meta-analytic comparison of echocardiographic stressors

BACKGROUND

The relative performance of alternative stressors for stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) is not well established.

METHODS

All studies published between 1981 to December 2001 who met inclusion criteria were included in this analysis. We performed a summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) analysis and calculated weighted mean of the likelihood ratio and sensitivity/specificity. A covariate analysis using meta-regression methods was also performed.

RESULTS

Forty-four studies presented data on Exercise, 11 on Adenosine, 80 on Dobutamine, 40 on Dipyridamole, 16 on transatrial pacing transesophageal echocardiography (Tap-TEE), and 7 on transatrial pacing transthorasic echocardiography (Tap-TTE). SROC analysis showed that the following order of most discriminatory to least: Tap-TEE, Exercise, Dipyridamole, Dobutamine and Adenosine. Weighted means sensitivity/specificity were Exercise: 82.6/84.4%, Adenosine: 68.4/80.9%, Dobutamine: 79.6/85.1%, Dipyridamole: 71.0/92.2%, Tap-TTE: 90.7/86.1%, and Tap-TEE: 86.2/91.3%. Covariate analysis showed that the discriminatory power of Exercise decreased with increasing mean age.

CONCLUSIONS

Tap-TEE is a very accurate test for both ruling in and ruling out CAD although its invasiveness may limit its clinical acceptability. Exercise is a well-balanced satisfactory test for both ruling in and ruling out but performance might be lower for the elderly. Dobutamine offers a reasonable compromise for Exercise. Dipyridamole might be good for ruling in but not for ruling out CAD. The incapability in ruling-out CAD was a major problem in clinical application of the stress. Adenosine was the least useful stressor in diagnosing CAD.

Head-to-head comparison of dipyridamole, dobutamine and pacing stress echocardiography for the detection of myocardial ischemia in an animal model of coronary artery stenosis

To compare the sensitivity of dipyridamole, dobutamine and pacing stress echocardiography for the detection of myocardial ischemia we produced a physiologically significant stenosis in the left circumflex artery of 14 open-chest dogs (range: 50 to 89% reduction in luminal diameter). In each study, dobutamine (5 to 40 microg kg(-1) min(-1) in 3-min stages) and pacing (20 bpm increments, each 2 min, up to 260 bpm) were performed randomly, and then followed by dipyridamole (up to 0.84 mg/kg over 10 min). The positivity of stress echocardiography tests was quantitatively determined by a significant (P<0.05) reduction of or failure to increase absolute and percent systolic wall thickening in the stenotic artery supplied wall, as compared to the opposite wall (areas related to the left anterior descending artery). Systolic and diastolic frozen images were analyzed off-line by two blinded observers in the control and stress conditions. The results showed that 1) the sensitivity of dobutamine, dipyridamole and pacing stress tests was 57, 57 and 36%, respectively; 2) in animals with positive tests, the mean percent change of wall thickening in left ventricular ischemic segments was larger in the pacing (-19 +/- 11%) and dipyridamole (-18 +/- 16%) tests as compared to dobutamine (-9 +/- 6%) (P = 0.05), but a similar mean reduction of wall thickening was observed when this variable was normalized to a control left ventricular segment (area related to the left anterior descending artery) (pacing: -16 +/- 7%; dipyridamole: -25 +/- 16%; dobutamine: -26 +/- 10%; not significant), and 3) a significant correlation was observed between magnitude of coronary stenosis and left ventricular segmental dysfunction induced by ischemia in dogs submitted to positive stress tests. We conclude that the dobutamine and dipyridamole stress tests showed identical sensitivities for the detection of myocardial ischemia in this one-vessel disease animal model with a wide range of left circumflex artery stenosis. The pacing stress test was less sensitive, but the difference was not statistically significant. The magnitude of segmental left ventricular dysfunction induced by ischemia was similar in all stress tests evaluated.

Diagnostic and prognostic use of stress echocardiography in stable patients

Stress echocardiography is an effective diagnostic and prognostic technique in stable patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), myocardial infarction, or chronic left ventricular dysfunction and those undergoing noncardiac surgery. Stress echocardiography is sensitive and specific for the detection and extent of CAD. Negative tests confer a high negative predictive value for cardiac events regardless of the clinical risk. Positive studies confer a high positive predictive value for ischemic events in patients with intermediate to high clinical risk. Stress echocardiography provides incremental prognostic information relative to clinical, resting echocardiographic, and angiographic data. Meta-analysis studies have shown that the diagnostic and prognostic information provided by stress echocardiography is comparable to that from radionuclide scintigraphic stress tests. Stress echocardiography may be more specific for the detection and extent of CAD, whereas radionuclide scintigraphy may be more sensitive for one-vessel disease. Sensitivities are similar for the detection and extent of disease in patients with multivessel CAD.

The comparable diagnostic accuracies of dobutamine-stress and dipyridamole-stress echocardiographies: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Dobutamine-stress and dipyridamole-stress echocardiographies are widely used for pharmacological stress echocardiography, with wide geographical variations.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether evidence derived from the literature indicates or disapproves that either stress modality confers diagnostic superiority.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of peer-reviewed literature of published trials with head-to-head comparison, on the same population, of high-dose (0.84 mg/kg) dipyridamole-stress versus high-dose (up to 40 micrograms/kg per min) dobutamine-stress echocardiography. Data from 12 studies performed in 12 institutions in seven countries were analysed. Angiographic information about 818 patients was considered.

RESULTS

The diagnostic accuracies of the two tests were similar (631 of 818, 77%, for dipyridamole versus 654 of 818, 80%, for dobutamine, NS). Overall sensitivities were 403 of 568 (71%) for dipyridamole and 437 of 568 (77%) for dobutamine (P < 0.05). Sensitivities for patients with single-vessel disease were 177 of 275 (64%) for dipyridamole and 203 of 275 (74%) for dobutamine (P < 0.05). Sensitivities for patients with multivessel disease were 162 of 203 (80%) for dipyridamole and 163 of 203 (80%) for dobutamine (NS). Specificities were 232 of 250 (93%) for dipyridamole and 217 of 250 (87%) for dobutamine (P < 0.05). Data from an additional 26 studies with dipyridamole alone and 47 studies with dobutamine alone were analysed. The diagnostic accuracies were 80% for dipyridamole (n = 2038 patients; 95% confidence interval 75-82%) and 82% for dobutamine (n = 4264 patients; 95% confidence interval 79-84%).

CONCLUSION

High-dose dobutamine-stress and high-dose dipyridamole-stress echocardiographies have comparable diagnostic accuracies, with a slightly higher sensitivity with dobutamine and a slightly higher specificity with dipyridamole.

Diagnostic and Prognostic Use of Stress Echocardiography and Radionuclide Scintigraphy

Stress echocardiography and radionuclide scintigraphy are effective diagnostic and prognostic techniques in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), myocardial infarction (MI), chronic left ventricular dysfunction (LVD), and those undergoing noncardiac surgery. Both are sensitive and specific for the detection and extent of CAD. Negative tests confer a high negative predictive value for cardiac events irrespective of clinical risk. Positive studies confer a high positive predictive value for ischemic events in patients with intermediate to high clinical risk. Both provide incremental diagnostic and prognostic information relative to clinical, resting echocardiographic, and angiographic data. Meta-analysis studies have shown that the diagnostic and prognostic information provided by stress echocardiography is comparable with radionuclide scintigraphic stress tests. Stress echocardiography may be more specific for the detection and extent of CAD, whereas radionuclide scintigraphy may be more sensitive for single-vessel disease. Sensitivities are similar for the detection and extent of disease in patients with multivessel CAD.

Dipyridamole stress echocardiography

Dipyridamole stress is the forerunner and prototype of pharmacological stress echo tests in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. The safety of this test has been conclusively demonstrated as a result of extensive experience in large-scale multicenter projects. The diagnostic accuracy of dipyridamole stress echo is comparable to dobutamine and largely a function of the employed dose. Higher dosages (up to 0.84 mg/kg) are being required to achieve good sensitivity. The prognostic value has been shown to be independent and additive to clinical, exercise echocardiogram, and angiographic data. The test positive response should be titrated on the basis of severity, extent, and timing of induced dyssynergy with low positivity being associated to more anatomically and functionally severe forms of disease. Multicenter, randomized, prospective, international studies on cost-effectiveness directly comparing a noninvasive strategy centered on stress echo versus an invasive strategy centered on coronary angiography are currently ongoing.

Head-to-head comparison of exercise stress testing, pharmacologic stress echocardiography, and perfusion tomography as first-line examination for chest pain in patients without history of coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

To overcome the relatively low accuracy of exercise stress testing (EST) in detecting coronary artery disease (CAD), both echocardiography and perfusion scintigraphy have been evaluated in conjunction with pharmacologic stress, but there is still uncertainty of the relative value of these tests as possible first-line examinations for suspected CAD. This study evaluated the accuracy of EST, dipyridamole and dobutamine stress echocardiography (DIP-ECHO, DOB-ECHO), and dipyridamole and dobutamine technetium 99m sestamibi tomography (DIP-MIBI, DOB-MIBI) for the detection of CAD in patients evaluated for the first time because of chest pain.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixty patients underwent EST, DIP-ECHO, DOB-ECHO, DIP-MIBI, and DOB-MIBI. Echocardiographic images were acquired simultaneously with sestamibi injections, and the scintigraphic images were collected 1 hour later. Coronary angiography was performed within 15 days. Out of 33 patients with significant (>70%) coronary stenoses, 19 (58%) were correctly identified by EST, 18 (55%) by DIP-ECHO, 20 (61%) by DOB-ECHO, 32 (97%) by DIP-MIBI, and 30 (91%) by DOB-MIBI (p < 0.005 for MIBI vs EST and ECHO). The specificity of EST was 67% (p < 0.05 vs ECHO and MIBI), 96%, 96%, 89%, and 81%, respectively. Of the 62 stenotic coronary arteries, 20 (32%) were correctly identified by DIP-ECHO, 24 (39%) by DOB-ECHO, 48 (77%) by DIP-MIBI, and 45 (73%) by DOB-MIBI. The sensitivity of the imaging techniques in predicting the presence of multivessel disease was 14% and 29% for DIP and DOB-ECHO compared with 48% and 57% for DIP and DOB-MIBI.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm the limited reliability of EST in detecting CAD and the good diagnostic value of DIP and DOB-MIBI. Conversely, the lower sensitivity and the poorer capability to recognize multivessel CAD do not support the role of either DIP or DOB-ECHO as first-line examination for suspected CAD.

Detection of regional perfusion abnormalities during adenosine stress echocardiography with intravenous perfluorocarbon-exposed sonicated dextrose albumin

Although perfluorocarbon-exposed sonicated dextrose albumin (PESDA) microbubbles produce myocardial contrast after intravenous injection, it is unknown whether their use can accurately identify myocardial blood-flow abnormalities during stress echocardiography. Accordingly, we compared the background-subtracted peak myocardial videointensity (PMVI) after intravenous injections of PESDA before and during adenosine stress (100 to 140 units/kg/min) in 10 open-chest dogs with angiographically significant left circumflex artery disease. The ratios of PMVI in the ischemic region compared with the adjacent normal left anterior descending perfusion bed were measured, as were wall-thickening and coronary-flow ratios. In the dogs with a >50% diameter stenosis, there was a decrease in PMVI ratio during adenosine stress by >0.20 in 9, whereas wall-thickening ratios decreased in only 5. PMVI in the ischemic zone increased by <1.5 units during adenosine infusion in 8 of 10 dogs, whereas it increased by >1.5 units in 8 of 1O adjacent normal zones. We conclude that regional myocardial-perfusion abnormalities can be detected with intravenous PESDA during adenosine stress echocardiography.

Transesophageal assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve during "regular" and "high"-dose dipyridamole stress testing

To assess the effect of regular and high-dose dipyridamole on coronary flow velocity in the left anterior descending artery (LAD), and to determine whether assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) is more sensitive for detection of ischemia than standard echocardiographic criteria, 47 patients were studied prospectively: 16 patients with stenosis of the LAD, 18 patients with angiographically normal LADs, and 13 patients with minimal disease. Patients underwent transesophageal echocardiographic study of wall motion and LAD flow velocity at baseline and at hyperemia, and for angina and electrocardiographic changes. The mean CFVR values after 0.56 mg/kg after 0.84 mg/kg of dipyridamole were similar: 2.52 +/- 0.87 versus 2.62 +/- 0.90. A CFVR <2.3 (normals mean -2 SDs) was more sensitive (88% at both doses) for the detection of underlying coronary obstruction than was wall motion monitoring (44% and 75%, respectively). The combination of CFVR <2.3 and wall monitoring was more sensitive than index alone (94% at both 0.56 and 0.84 mg/kg). The rate-pressure product was not significantly different at the two doses of dipyridamole. When flow response is the end point of stress testing, as with transesophageal monitoring, the 0.56 mg/kg dose of dipyrid mole is adequate, but when ischemia is the end point (as with wall motion monitoring by 2-dimensional echocardiography), the dose of 0.84 mg/kg is more sensitive.

High dose dipyridamole as a pharmacological stress test during cardiac catheterisation in patients with coronary artery disease

AIM

To validate dipyridamole as a pharmacological stress test during cardiac catheterisation, allowing both functional and morphological estimation of stenosis severity.

METHODS

The study encompassed 74 patients: 62 patients with significant coronary artery disease (age 61 (SD 8) years; seven women, 55 men) and 12 controls. Regional wall motion, left ventricular ejection fraction and end diastolic pressure were analysed in the resting state and after high dose intravenous dipyridamole. Patients were subdivided into four groups: group I (n = 32, 43%) had stopped all anti-ischaemic treatment for > 24 h, group II (n = 14, 19%) was under treatment, group III (n = 16, 22%) had significant coronary artery disease only in regions with regional wall motion abnormalities at rest, and group IV consisted of 12 control patients (16%) with no significant coronary artery disease (age 62 (8) years, three women, nine men).

RESULTS

The sensitivity of dipyridamole testing in patients with coronary artery disease was poor. The best sensitivity was obtained with regional wall motion analysis (26/62 = 42%) and with global left ventricular ejection fraction (25/62 = 40%). Specificity was 100% for regional wall motion and 100% for ejection fraction. Calculated positive and negative predictive values for regional wall motion were 100% and 63%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although safe, handy, and inexpensive, dipyridamole is not an adequate pharmacological stress test during cardiac catheterisation because of its low sensitivity.

Results of dipyridamole plus atropine echo stress test for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease

Sensitivity of dipyridamole stress echocardiography (DIP-E) has been reported to be less than ideal in particular subsets of patients such as those with less severe extent of coronary artery disease (CAD). To verify if sensitivity could be improved, ATRO (1 mg in 2 minutes) was added at the end of a negative high-dose (0.84 mg/kg over 10 minutes) DIP-E in 61 consecutive patients (58 men, aged 53 +/- 7 years) evaluated for chest pain (33%) or for detection of residual ischemia after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or previous MI (67%). DIP-E was positive in 28/61 (46%) and negative in 33/61 (54%) patients. Additional echo positivity was obtained in 18/33 (54%) patients after ATRO. Coronary arteriography was normal in 6 patients (10%); 1-vessel CAD was diagnosed in 28 (46%), 2-vessel CAD in 16 (26%) and 3-vessel CAD in 11 (18%) cases. The sensitivity for CAD diagnosis was 49% (27/55) for DIP-E and 84% (46/55) for DIP-E+ATRO (p < 0.001). Specificity was 83% and 80%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy increased from 52% to 83% (p < 0.001). The better diagnostic accuracy of DIP-E was mainly related to the significant increase in sensitivity of the combined test in patients with 1-vessel CAD (from 46% to 75%) (p < 0.005). At quantitative coronary evaluation, compared to patients with positive DIP-E+ATRO or negative DIP-E+ATRO test, patients with positive DIP-E had a higher mean % diameter stenosis: 80 +/- 13% vs 72 +/- 24% and 65 +/- 36%, respectively. Peak heart rate was significantly higher after the addition of ATRO vs basal and DIP alone in patients with a positive DIP-E+ATRO test. The addition of ATRO to DIP increases diagnostic accuracy of DIP-E particularly in patients with less severe extent of CAD; ATRO may be considered as a useful routine procedure for increasing diagnostic value of DIP-E test.

Stress echocardiography: comparison of exercise, dipyridamole and dobutamine in detecting and predicting the extent of coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to compare exercise, dipyridamole and dobutamine echocardiography in the same patients and to evaluate, by measuring physiologic and echocardiographic variables, the mechanisms by which exercise and dobutamine induce ischemia.

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic value of stress echocardiography has been widely reported, but the specific effects of exercise, dipyridamole and dobutamine have not been directly compared. Furthermore, no echocardiography study has evaluated left ventricular volume changes at ischemic threshold during exercise and dobutamine administration.

METHODS

One hundred patients with suspected (Group A, n = 60) or known (Group B, n = 40) coronary artery disease underwent all three tests in random order.

RESULTS

In Group A, the sensitivities of exercise (mean 76%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 58% to 94%) and of dobutamine echocardiography (72%, 95% CI 53% to 91%) were higher than that of dipyridamole (52%, 95% CI 31% to 73%; p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). Specificity did not differ significantly among tests (94% for exercise [95% CI 86% to 100%] and 97% for dipyridamole and dobutamine [95% CI 91% to 100%]). Accuracy was identical for exercise and dobutamine (87%) and higher than that for dipyridamole (78%, p = 0.06). In Group B, the accuracy in predicting coronary disease extent was 71% for exercise, 33% for dipyridamole and 75% for dobutamine. At ischemic threshold, end-systolic volume index and the ratio of systolic blood pressure to end-systolic volume, a variable related to myocardial contractility, were significantly lower and higher, respectively, with dobutamine than during exercise (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In a clinical setting, exercise echocardiography should represent the first diagnostic approach because it has high diagnostic efficacy and provides additional information on exercise capacity; pharmacologic stress, particularly that of dobutamine, provides a pivotal diagnostic tool when exercise is not feasible or its results are nondiagnostic. Our preliminary data on echocardiographic evaluation at ischemic threshold support the view that myocardial contractility is a major factor in inducing ischemia during dobutamine infusion.

Magnitude of myocardial dysfunction is greater in painful than in painless myocardial ischemia: an exercise echocardiographic study

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the presence and extent of inducible myocardial dysfunction during painful and painless (silent) myocardial ischemia in a homogeneous patient cohort with coronary artery disease and no previous myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND

The functional significance of painless versus painful demand-driven ischemia remains controversial, with conflicting results in published reports regarding the amount of myocardium in jeopardy.

METHODS

Exercise echocardiography was performed in 89 patients (mean [+/- SD] age 59.3 +/- 8.2 years) with significant coronary artery disease and positive exercise stress test results. Patients were taking no antianginal medications and were classified into painless and painful cohorts after the outcome of a symptom-limited treadmill exercise test. No patients had previous coronary artery bypass surgery. Images were acquired in digital format before and immediately after treadmill exercise testing.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients had painful and 31 painless myocardial ischemia. Clinical and demographic characteristics as well as coronary artery anatomy were similar in both groups. Patients with painless ischemia achieved better exercise performance with greater exercise duration (p < 0.001) and higher maximal rate-blood pressure product (p < 0.001) than those with painful ischemia. New wall motion abnormalities were seen in 54 patients (93%) with painful versus 17 (55%) with painless ischemia (p < 0.001). Total ischemic score was greater in patients with painful than in those with painless ischemia (15.9 +/- 3.7 vs. 12 +/- 1.4, p < 0.001, respectively), with a greater number of ischemic myocardial segments in painful than in painless ischemia (101 [16%] vs. 21 [6%], p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with painless ischemia frequently have regional myocardial dysfunction on exertion detected by echocardiography, but painful episodes are accompanied by a greater magnitude of myocardial dysfunction.

Pharmacologically induced myocardial ischemia: a comparison of dobutamine and dipyridamole

The purpose of our study was to compare the ability of dobutamine and dipyridamole infusion to induce myocardial ischemia. In a population of 16 anesthetized open-chest swine, a coronary artery stenosis sufficient to abolish the hyperemic response to a 15-second total occlusion was created. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and dP/dt were recorded. Myocardial segment shortening was determined by sonomicrometry in all animals. In a subset of seven animals regional myocardial blood flow was measured by injection of radiolabeled microspheres. Dipyridamole was infused according to a high-dose protocol. After a washout period and reestablishment of a baseline state, dobutamine was infused incrementally. There was no significant difference between the baseline states. Dipyridamole did not affect heart rate but did significantly decrease blood pressure and rate-pressure product. Myocardial segment shortening decreased in the ischemic zone by 0.07 +/- 0.08 (p = 0.004). Dobutamine infusion significantly increased heart rate, blood pressure, and rate-pressure product. Myocardial segment shortening in the ischemic zone decreased by 0.17 +/- 0.09 (p < 0.001). Dobutamine decreased blood flow in the ischemic zone relative to baseline. Both dobutamine and dipyridamole infusion resulted in myocardial ischemia. The magnitude of the ischemic response is greater for dobutamine than for dipyridamole.

Detection of coronary artery disease by digital stress echocardiography: comparison of exercise, transesophageal atrial pacing and dipyridamole echocardiography

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed and compared the diagnostic potential of exercise, transesophageal atrial pacing and dipyridamole stress echocardiography in a clinical setting.

BACKGROUND

Although they have been widely studied, no data exist with regard to comparisons of these procedures in a head-to-head study in different clinical settings.

METHODS

One hundred four consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease undergoing coronary angiography and with no previous myocardial infarction or rest left ventricular wall motion abnormalities underwent digital posttreadmill, transesophageal atrial pacing and dipyridamole echocardiography.

RESULTS

Feasibility of digital exercise echocardiography was 84%; 8 of 88 remaining patients had a nondiagnostic exercise echocardiographic test (inadequate exercise or imaging). In 80 patients with feasible and diagnostic digital exercise echocardiography, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were, respectively, 89%, 91% and 90%. Eighty of the 104 patients underwent transesophageal atrial pacing and dipyridamole echocardiography. Feasibility of the alternative stress procedures was 77% for transesophageal atrial pacing and 96% for dipyridamole. In 60 patients successfully undergoing both alternative stress procedures, sensitivity and specificity were 83% and 76% for atrial pacing and 43% and 92% for dipyridamole echocardiography, respectively. In the group of 24 patients with nondiagnostic exercise echocardiography and consequent indication to alternative stress procedures, accuracy of transesophageal atrial pacing was higher than that of dipyridamole echocardiography (73% vs. 45%, p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Because of its higher diagnostic potential and additional functional information, exercise is the stress of choice when stress echocardiography is used to detect the presence of coronary artery disease. Alternative stresses can be used in patients with nondiagnostic exercise echocardiography. Transesophageal and dipyridamole echocardiography differ in feasibility and diagnostic reliability (higher sensitivity of transesophageal atrial pacing, higher specificity of dipyridamole). These characteristics must be considered when selecting procedures to be used as alternatives to exercise.

Assessment of anatomic and physiological severity of single-vessel coronary artery lesions by dipyridamole echocardiography. Comparison with positron emission tomography and quantitative arteriography

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the results of dipyridamole-echocardiography test (DET: two-dimensional echo monitoring during dipyridamole infusion up to 0.84 mg/kg over a period of 10 minutes) with both anatomic and physiological parameters of coronary artery disease severity, assessed by computer-assisted quantitative coronary arteriography, and regional coronary flow reserve, measured by [13N]ammonia (13NH3) and dynamic positron emission tomography (PET), respectively.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 31 patients with a history of chest pain and neither previous myocardial infarction nor resting wall motion abnormalities. Eighteen patients had single-vessel disease (> 50% stenosis of one major coronary vessel), and 13 had normal coronary arteries. The criterion for DET positivity was the appearance of a new transient regional wall motion abnormality. In patients with a positive DET, two parameters were evaluated: the dipyridamole time (ie, the time from the beginning of drug infusion to the development of obvious dyssynergy) and the wall motion score index (WMSI, a semiquantitative integrated estimation of extent and severity of the stress-induced dyssynergy). WMSI was derived by summation of individual segment scores divided by the number of segments interpreted. Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow was obtained by PET measurements of 13NH3 arterial input function and left ventricular myocardial tissue concentration both at control and after dipyridamole (0.56 mg/kg over 4 minutes). Maximal regional blood flow after dipyridamole in the region supplied by the stenotic vessel was significantly lower in the 11 patients with coronary artery disease and positive DET than in the 7 patients with coronary artery disease and negative DET (1.08 +/- 0.33 versus 1.98 +/- 0.37 mL.min-1.g-1, P < .01). In patients with a positive DET, regional coronary flow reserve correlated well with dipyridamole time (r = .87, P < .01) but not with peak WMSI (r = .25, P = NS). Patients with dipyridamole-induced akinesia or dyskinesia (n = 6) had a greater reduction in regional coronary flow reserve than did those showing hypokinesia (n = 5): 1.38 +/- 0.51 versus 2.17 +/- 0.42, P < .05. Percent area reduction was more severe in patients with DET positivity than in those with DET negativity (93.7 +/- 8.7% versus 77 +/- 10.3%, P < .01), and it correlated with regional coronary flow reserve (r = .64, P < .01) and dipyridamole time (r = -.59, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with single-vessel disease, DET shows an excellent specificity but a limited sensitivity; in these patients, DET positivity is associated with a physiologically important coronary stenosis. Severity of the anatomic stenosis and impairment in regional flow reserve are greater when the dipyridamole-induced dyssynergy appears earlier during the test. Therefore, a stratification of the anatomo-physiological severity of coronary artery disease can be obtained with DET, based mainly on the temporal allocation of the transient dyssynergy.

Comparison of dobutamine stress echocardiography, dipyridamole stress echocardiography and exercise stress testing for diagnosis of coronary artery disease

To compare the value of dobutamine and dipyridamole stress echocardiography with exercise stress testing for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD), 80 patients with chest pain of suspected myocardial ischemic origin (57 with CAD and 23 without significant CAD) underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography (5 to 40 micrograms/kg/min), dipyridamole echocardiography (0.84 mg/kg over 10 minutes) and bicycle exercise electrocardiography after discontinuation of antianginal treatment. Dobutamine echocardiography and exercise testing revealed a higher overall sensitivity than dipyridamole echocardiography (79 vs 60%, p < 0.005; 77 vs 60%, p < 0.05, respectively); this finding was due to a higher dobutamine and exercise sensitivity in 1-vessel CAD (62 vs 33%, p < 0.05 for both tests), whereas sensitivity of the 3 tests was similar in multivessel CAD. Dobutamine and dipyridamole showed a higher specificity than exercise (83 vs 43%, p < 0.01; 96 vs 43%, p < 0.005, respectively). Diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine echocardiography was higher than that of exercise (80 vs 67%, p < 0.05), whereas the difference with dipyridamole (80 vs 70%) was not significant. In the tests that yielded positive results, double product during exercise was significantly higher than that during dobutamine and dipyridamole echocardiography. No major complications occurred during the tests, but adverse effects were more frequent during dobutamine testing. Thus, dobutamine echocardiography may be superior to dipyridamole echocardiography and exercise electrocardiography for the diagnosis of CAD.

Digital supine bicycle stress echocardiography: a new technique for evaluating coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of digital supine bicycle stress echocardiography, a new technique for evaluating coronary artery disease during peak exercise.

BACKGROUND

Prior stress echocardiographic techniques have not utilized peak exercise imaging to determine the extent and location of coronary artery disease.

METHODS

Two-hundred twenty-two patients were studied: 180 underwent both supine bicycle stress echocardiography and coronary arteriography; 42 had a < 5% likelihood of disease. Forty-three patients had normal coronary arteries, 55 had single-vessel, 42 had double-vessel and 40 had triple-vessel coronary artery disease.

RESULTS

Supine bicycle stress echocardiography was 93% sensitive, 86% specific and 92% accurate for identifying patients with coronary artery disease irrespective of prior myocardial infarction or achievement of > or = 85% maximal predicted heart rate. The "normalcy" rate in the low probability group was 100%. Supine bicycle stress echocardiography was 87% sensitive, 89% specific and 88% accurate for specific vessel identification. The sensitivity was greatest for the left anterior descending compared with the right coronary artery and the left circumflex coronary artery (95% vs. 81% vs. 78%, p < 0.01) and for vessels in patients with double- and triple-vessel compared with single-vessel disease (90% vs. 89% vs. 78%, p < 0.05). The procedure was significantly more sensitive for detection of vessels with 90% to 100% compared with 50% to 70% diameter stenosis (91% vs. 81%, p < 0.05) and was 88% correct in the prediction of multivessel disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Supine bicycle stress echocardiography is a highly accurate tool for evaluating coronary artery disease, identifying both the patient with coronary artery disease and the location and extent of disease.

Selection of the optimal nonexercise stress for the evaluation of ischemic regional myocardial dysfunction and malperfusion. Comparison of dobutamine and adenosine using echocardiography and 99mTc-MIBI single photon emission computed tomography

BACKGROUND

The mechanisms of action of exercise-simulating and vasodilator stressors support their combination with imaging techniques that evaluate left ventricular function and perfusion, respectively. However, reported accuracies of either pharmacological stress together with two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) or single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) of myocardial perfusion are similar. The purpose of this study was to establish the optimal stress for each imaging technique by comparing the results of digitized 2DE and 99mTc-methoxyisobutyl isonitrile (MIBI) SPECT using both dobutamine and adenosine stresses in the same patients and conditions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Ninety-seven consecutive patients without evidence of previous infarction undergoing coronary angiography for clinical indications were studied prospectively. Dobutamine was infused during clinical, ECG, and echocardiographic monitoring in dose increments from 5 to 40 micrograms.kg-1.min-1. Adenosine was infused under the same conditions in doses of 0.10, 0.14, and 0.18 mg.kg-1.min-1. For each protocol, the end points were achievement of peak dose, development of severe ischemia, or intolerable side effects. At peak stress, 20 mCi of MIBI was injected, and SPECT imaging was performed 2 hours later; abnormal poststress images were compared with resting SPECT: Digitized 2DE images were compared qualitatively before, during, and after stress in a cine-loop display. Significant coronary disease (n = 59 patients) was defined by the quantification of > 50% stenosis in a major epicardial vessel. The sensitivity of adenosine 2DE was 58%, less than those of adenosine MIBI (86%, p = 0.001), dobutamine 2DE (85%, p = 0.001), and dobutamine MIBI (80%, p = 0.01). Their respective specificities were 87%, 71%, 82%, and 74% (p = NS). The accuracy of adenosine 2DE was 69%, compared with 80% for adenosine MIBI (p < 0.001), 84% for dobutamine 2DE (p = 0.001), and 77% for dobutamine MIBI (p = 0.005); the latter three did not differ significantly in either sensitivity or accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective, direct comparison of alternative pharmacological stresses in patients without myocardial infarction shows vasodilator stress scintigraphy and dobutamine stress echocardiography and scintigraphy to share equivalent levels of sensitivity. All three are significantly more sensitive than adenosine stress echocardiography. Dobutamine stress may be used for wall motion or perfusion imaging, but adenosine stress is best combined with perfusion scintigraphy.