Impaired left ventricular filling dynamics in patients with angina and angiographically normal coronary arteries: effect of beta adrenergic blockade

NONOBSTRUCTIVE CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE - CLINICAL RELEVANCE, DIAGNOSIS, MANAGEMENT AND PROPOSAL OF NEW PATHOPHYSIOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION

SUMMARY – New data gathered from large clinical trials indicate that nonobstructive coronary artery disease (non-CAD) is a clinical entity that should not be ignored. It is estimated that 50% of female population undergoing coronarography are diagnosed with non-CAD. There is also an increase in the prevalence of non-CAD in both genders, which is probably due to gradual expanding of clinical indications for angiography in patients with angina. Furthermore, considering the increased mortality risk established recently, a prognosis of non-CAD is not benign as previously thought. However, the concept and definition of non-CAD remains elusive causing difficulties in diagnosis and treatment. One of the major shortcomings is the exclusion-based diagnosis of non-CAD. Furthermore, treatment of non-CAD still presents a great challenge and optimal therapy is yet to be determined. There are two major hypotheses explaining the pathophysiological mechanisms of non-CAD, i.e. ischemic hypothesis based on abnormal microvascular dysfunction and non-ischemic one based on altered pain perception. This review encompasses a broader spectrum of pathophysiological mechanisms of non-CAD, and proposes a new way of classification based on the major disorder involved: type I (ischemic mechanisms) and type II (non-ischemic mechanisms), depending on which mechanism predominates. Hopefully, this would provide new insights in the understanding of this disorder, thus leading to accurate and early diagnosis and successful treatment, especially considering the increased mortality risk in these patients.

Pharmacologic Treatment of Patients With Myocardial Ischemia With No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Half of women and 1/3 of men with angina and ischemia on stress testing have ischemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA). These patients have quality of life (QoL) impairment comparable with patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. Clinicians generally treat INOCA with traditional antianginal agents despite previous studies demonstrating variable response to these medications. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of available pharmacologic therapies for INOCA. We systematically searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, MEDLINE, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform in July 2017 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating pharmacologic agents for INOCA. The primary outcome of interest was QoL. Secondary outcomes included subjective and objective efficacy measures and safety outcomes. We included 35 RCTs from 333 identified studies. Interventions that improved QoL with moderate-quality evidence included angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (±statin) and ranolazine. Low-to-very-low-quality evidence also suggests that ACE inhibitors, β blockers, calcium-channel blockers, nicorandil, ranolazine, and statins may decrease angina frequency and delay ischemia on stress testing. Other interventions, most notably nitrates, did not significantly improve any outcome. In conclusion, evidence for pharmacologic treatment of INOCA is generally poor, and higher-quality RCTs using a standardized definition of INOCA are needed. Moderate-quality evidence suggests that ACE inhibitors and ranolazine improve QoL. Other interventions had low-quality evidence or no evidence of efficacy.

Metoprolol Improves Endothelial Function in Patients with Cardiac Syndrome X

Endothelial dysfunction which is manifested by the loss of nitric oxide bioavailability, is an increasingly recognized cause of cardiac syndrome X (CSX) and beta blockers are used for the treatment of this syndrome. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate effects of metoprolol, as a beta blocker, on endothelial function in CSX patients. The study included 25 CSX patients (20 female/ 5 male, mean age: 55.36±10.31 years) who received metoprolol (50 mg BID) for one month. In addition, 25 healthy controls (20 female/ 5 male, mean age: 54.32 ±9.27 years) were enrolled. Levels of endothelin-1, E-selectin, and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) in controls and CSX patients were measured, both at the baseline and after the treatment, by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In CSX patients, at the baseline, levels of E-selectin and VCAM-1 were significantly higher than those of the controls. In addition, levels of these biomarkers in CSX patients after the treatment significantly decreased compared to the baseline. In spite of similar tendency, these differences were not significant for endothelin-1. In conclusion, metoprolol therapy improves endothelial function. Thus, it may be a suggested choice for CSX treatment. However, further studies are needed to confirm the clinical significance of metoprolol therapy for CSX patients.

Coronary endothelial dysfunction in non-obstructive coronary artery disease: Risk, pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy

Up to half of patients with signs and symptoms of stable ischemic heart disease have non-obstructive coronary artery disease (NoCAD). Recent evidence demonstrates that two-thirds of patients with NoCAD have demonstrable coronary endothelial dysfunction represented by microvascular or diffuse epicardial spasm following acetylcholine challenge. Patients with coronary endothelial dysfunction are recognized to have significant health services use and morbidity as well as increased risk of developing flow-limiting coronary artery disease and myocardial events, including death. Currently, there are few centers that test for this etiology owing to lack of knowledge, limited evidence for treatment options and invasive diagnostic strategies. This article reviews the pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of coronary endothelial dysfunction as a subgroup of NoCAD.

Management of microvascular angina pectoris

Microvascular angina (MVA) is defined as angina pectoris caused by abnormalities of small coronary arteries. In its most typical presentation, MVA is characterized by angina attacks mainly caused by effort, evidence of myocardial ischemia on non-invasive stress tests, but normal coronary arteries at angiography. Patients with stable MVA have excellent long-term prognoses, but often present with persistent and/or worsening of angina symptoms. Treatment of MVA is initially based on standard anti-ischemic drugs (beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, and nitrates), but control of symptoms is often insufficient. In these cases, several additional drugs, with different potential anti-ischemic effects, have been proposed, including ranolazine, ivabradine, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, xanthine derivatives, nicorandil, statins, alpha-blockers and, in perimenopausal women, estrogens. In patients with 'refractory MVA', some further alternative therapies (e.g., spinal cord stimulation, pain-inhibiting substances such as imipramine, rehabilitation programs) have shown favorable results.

Angina in Women without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Angina in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease, sometimes referred to as cardiac syndrome X (CSX), is a debilitating condition that disproportionately affects women. More than 50% of women evaluated for angina have non-obstructive disease by cardiac catheterization, although the total numbers of women affected by CSX are unknown. Varying clinical definitions and the lack of large scale epidemiologic studies focusing on this illness have resulted in limited knowledge about its risk factors, although there appears to be an association with black race, estrogen deficiency, and insulin resistance. Contrary to prior beliefs about the benign nature of this entity, these women suffer considerable morbidity with costly economic implications that approach the lifetime costs of healthcare utilization for those with obstructive coronary disease. Two prevailing hypotheses have emerged to explain CSX: the ischemic hypothesis detailing abnormal coronary microvascular function and the non-ischemic hypothesis describing altered pain perception and myocardial hypersensitivity. Treatment strategies have focused on both of these pathways with the main goal of improving symptoms. Beta blockers provide the most convincing evidence for benefit, with other antianginals having secondary roles. Other promising pharmacologic therapies include xanthine derivatives, estrogen replacement therapy, ACE inhibitors, and statin medications, among other emerging treatment options. Neurostimulation and lifestyle factors including exercise can also be beneficial in reducing symptoms. However, managing patients with CSX can be frustrating for both patients and physicians, as there is a lack of data regarding an optimal treatment algorithm including few large-scale randomized controlled trials to clarify effective therapies.

Gender and microvascular angina

There are gender differences in the presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of chest pain. When compared to men, women may have more atypical presentations of chest pain. In addition, current diagnostic tools are often not definitive regarding cardiac etiology for chest pain in women. The current diagnostic model of chest pain focuses on significant obstructions within the large coronary arteries as the cause for angina. Microvascular angina (MVA) represents an under-recognized pathophysiologic mechanism that may explain the apparent disparities and elucidate an etiology for the common finding in women of chest pain, ischemia on stress testing, and no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) on angiography in the presence of abnormal coronary reactivity testing. Endothelial dysfunction, estrogen deficiency, and abnormal nociception play a role in the pathophysiology of MVA. Treatments are targeted toward these underlying mechanisms. Recognizing the role gender and other pathophysiologic models of chest pain can play in the work-up and treatment of angina may identify a treatable cardiac condition, that would otherwise be discounted as non-cardiac in origin.

Cardiac syndrome X: current concepts

Cardiac syndrome X is a heterogeneous entity, both clinically and pathophysiologically, encompassing a variety of pathogenic mechanisms. Management of this syndrome represents a major challenge to the treating physician. They often seek medical care because of recurring and disabling chest pain, which may imply repetitive and costly invasive and non-invasive investigations. A careful patient evaluation for underlying pathophysiologic mechanism and exclusion of other causes of chest pain along with attention to various psychological aspects is helpful in reducing the stress and suffering of these patients. This article reviews the available literature on the pathophysiology and current controversies surrounding the management of this difficult to treat condition.

Cardiac syndrome X and endothelial dysfunction: new concepts in prognosis and treatment

Cardiac syndrome X (CSX), or angina with no flow-limiting stenosis on coronary angiogram, has been regarded as a condition with an excellent prognosis despite variable symptomatic improvement. Newer data show that patients with CSX with endothelial dysfunction have an increased risk for future adverse cardiac events. Current hypotheses of CSX pathophysiology emphasize a dysfunctional vascular endothelium that leads to microvascular ischemia. Treatments that target improving endothelial function, such as statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, estrogen, and lifestyle modification, are promising additions to treatment regimens for CSX. The goal of this article is to provide information for improved diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapy for the population with CSX.

Cardiac syndrome X. Diagnosis, pathogenesis and management

Patients with cardiac syndrome X (typical chest pain and normal coronary arteriograms) represent a heterogeneous syndrome, which encompasses different pathogenic mechanisms. Although symptoms in most patients with cardiac syndrome X are non-cardiac, a sizable proportion of them have angina pectoris due to transient myocardial ischemia. Thus radionuclide myocardial perfusion defects, coronary sinus oxygen saturation abnormalities and pH changes, myocardial lactate production and stress-induced alterations of cardiac high energy phosphate suggest an ischemic origin of symptoms in at least a proportion of patients with cardiac syndrome X. Microvascular abnormalities, caused by endothelial dysfunction, appear to be responsible for myocardial ischemia in patients with cardiac syndrome X. Endothelial dysfunction is likely to be multifactorial in these patients and it is conceivable that risk factors such as hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus and smoking can contribute to its development. Most patients with cardiac syndrome X are postmenopausal women and estrogen deficiency has been therefore proposed as a pathogenic factor in female patients. Additional factors such as abnormal pain perception may contribute to the pathogenesis of chest pain in patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary angiograms. Although prognosis is good regarding survival, patients with cardiac syndrome X have an impaired quality of life. Management of this syndrome represents a major challenge to the treating physician. Understanding the mechanism underlying the condition is of vital importance for patient management. Thus diagnostic tests should aim at identifying the cause of the symptoms in the individual patient, i.e. myocardial ischemia, increased pain perception, abnormalities of adrenergic tone, non-cardiac mechanisms, etc. Moreover, it is important to bear in mind that treatment of cardiac syndrome X should be mainly directed towards improving quality of life, as prognosis is usually good in these patients. Conventional antianginal agents such nitrates, calcium channel antagonists, beta-adrenoceptor antagonists and nicorandil are effective particularly in patients in whom chest pain and ECG changes are clearly suggestive of myocardial ischemia and in those with objective documentation of ischemia. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been shown to be useful in syndrome X patients with increased adrenergic tone, borderline systemic hypertension, and those with documented endothelial dysfunction. Analgesic interventions of different sorts have been proposed based on the hypothesis that somatic and visceral perception of pain is altered in cardiac syndrome X patients. Pharmacological agents such as imipramine and aminophylline, and neural electrical stimulation techniques have been assessed in recent years with encouraging results. Psychological treatment, particularly cognitive therapy, appears to be useful in defined patient subsets. Relaxation techniques such as transcendental meditation have been successfully used in small studies and shown to improve not only chest pain but also exercise-induced ST segment changes. Reports indicate that these techniques improve quality of life.

High prevalence of (99m)tc-tetrofosmin reverse perfusion pattern in patients with myocardial infarction and angiographically smooth coronary arteries

BACKGROUND

There are no published data in the literature on the scintigraphic perfusion pattern in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and normal coronary arteries (NCA).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate myocardial perfusion imaging in a series of patients with MI and NCA.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients who had developed a MI and had NCA were studied. As a control group we included 27 patients with a recent MI and coronary artery disease (CAD). All patients underwent stress/rest tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion SPECT within 6 months from MI.

RESULTS

In patients with NCA tetrofosmin stress images revealed 41 hypoperfused segments in 17 patients (63%). On rest images, 13 segments remained unchanged, 4 showed partial reperfusion, 10 normalized and 14 worsened. Additionally, there were 18 new hypoperfused segments in nine patients. Therefore, perfusion worsened at rest in 18 patients (67%) (32 segments). Overall, at rest there were 49 hypoperfused segments in 22 patients (81%). In patients with CAD, stress images revealed 71 hypoperfused segments. On rest images, 39 segments remained unchanged, 16 showed partial reperfusion and 12 normalized. Four segments worsened at rest and only four patients (15%) showed new perfusion defects at rest.

CONCLUSIONS

Myocardial perfusion with tetrofosmin might appear considerably worse at rest than at stress in patients with MI and NCA. Specifically, a reverse perfusion pattern in the infarct area is a frequent finding and is likely to be due to residual tissue viability. We postulate that in these patients the hyperemic response to exercise may mask resting underperfusion areas.

Recent developments in microvascular angina

Microvascular angina (Syndrome X) is an extremely heterogeneous clinical entity that is the product of genetic, coronary microvascular, metabolic, and clinical factors, which combine together to produce distinct cardiac manifestations and complications. The interactions of these abnormalities remain poorly understood. The diagnosis is considered in patients with anginal symptoms and no epicardial coronary narrowing. Therapy is also problematic, with beta-blockers as first-line pharmacotherapy followed by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers.

Syndrome X

Syndrome X, defined as typical angina with positive exercise test results and normal coronary angiographic findings, represents a multifactorial pathophysiologic state that may range from abnormalities in pain perception to abnormalities in endothelial- and nonendothelial-dependent coronary flow reserve associated with myocardial ischemia. Treatment begins with accurate diagnosis by means of a comprehensive coronary vascular reactivity evaluation. This may lay the groundwork for appropriate treatment. The management of patients with syndrome X is challenging, and it may be necessary to attempt various medications depending on the patient's response. We feel that the first step in the treatment is accurate diagnosis. This is done by performing a functional angiogram (assessment of endothelial-dependent and endothelial-independent coronary flow reserve). In those without evidence of coronary flow reserve abnormalities, reassurance might be curative; however, in those who continue to have symptoms, a trial of imipramine therapy at a dose of 50 mg/d may be attempted, provided other organic disorders (in particular gastrointestinal disorders) are excluded. Those who demonstrate evidence of abnormal coronary vascular reactivity are approached as outlined in Figure 1. Patients are advised to avoid medications that may cause coronary "spasm." We routinely refer our patients to the cardiovascular health clinic for risk factor management and an exercise program. Our first choice of medications usually consists of slow-release calcium channel blockers. We tend to start with a once-a-day regimen, and based on the response, we occasionally change the regimen to twice a day. If the functional angiogram reveals concomitant epicardial disease, then nitrates are added to the medical regimen. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are part of the treatment if the patient has hypertension or diabetes or if calcium channel blocker therapy fails. l-Arginine at an initial dosage of 1 g three times daily is added and may be increased to 3 g three times daily if no contraindications are present. Because there are no data regarding the effect of l-arginine, which may affect insulin secretion, in patients with diabetes, we use caution in this patient population. There is no "gold standard" therapy for syndrome X, so each patient may respond differently to the initial medical therapy. Thus, we follow these patients closely to monitor their response to treatment.

Treatment of the hypertensive patient with microvascular angina

Syndrome X and microvascular angina are a heterogenous group of diseases. Several medications, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers, and calcium-channel blockers, have been reported to be successful in the treatment of microvascular angina. Control of hypertension and regression of left ventricular hypertrophy are important in controlling symptoms associated with this intriguing problem. The role of nitric oxide and the effects of L-arginine in the pathogenesis and treatment of hypertension and microvascular angina need to be elucidated. Optimal treatment will depend on the appropriate classification and diagnosis of chest pain in patients with hypertension and normal coronary angiograms.

Effect of atenolol on QT interval and dispersion in patients with syndrome X

Atenolol reduces QT dispersion and corrected QT interval in patients with syndrome X. This suggests that symptomatic improvement induced by atenolol in syndrome X patients may be partly related to reduction in abnormally augmented sympathetic tone.