Using quality improvement to increase the awareness of obesity among endometrial cancer patients

Nonsurgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer due to obesity: a survey of the practice patterns of current Society of Gynecologic Oncology members

Objective

Nonsurgical management for endometrial cancer in patients with class 3 obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) is a challenging scenario given lack of consensus on patient selection and treatment options. Our objective was to evaluate trends in practice patterns and physician opinions in the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) on nonsurgical management of endometrial cancer and complex atypical hyperplasia due to obesity.

Methods

An online survey was sent to all gynecologic oncologist members of the SGO with questions centered on decision-making for nonsurgical approaches for patients with class 3 obesity patients. Fisher's exact tests were used to assess the associations between offering nonsurgical management and geographic region, practice type, and time in practice.

Results

255 (19.8 %) members from 6 geographic regions responded, of which 183 (71.8 %) offered primary nonsurgical management of endometrial cancer to patients with class 3 obesity and 72 (28.2 %) do not. The choice to offer initial nonsurgical management did not vary based on geographic region, time in practice or practice type. When asked to select BMI cutoff, the majority (65.2 %) started to offer nonsurgical management was BMI 60-64 kg/m2. Progesterone intrauterine device was the preferred treatment (68.3 %, 125/183). Of those who offered nonsurgical management, 97.3 % (178/183) recommended resampling in 3-6 months.

Conclusion

Primary nonsurgical management of endometrial cancer in patients with class 3 obesity is offered by most gynecologic oncologists in SGO. However, almost one-third of gynecologic oncologists indicated they do not offer nonsurgical management for endometrial cancer for obesity alone. Additional data are needed to determine the safety of both approaches in these complex patients.

The interplay of obesity, microbiome dynamics, and innovative anti-obesity strategies in the context of endometrial cancer progression and therapeutic approaches

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States, and its incidence and mortality are rising. Obesity is more tightly associated with EC than any other cancer. Thus, the rising prevalence of obesity and associated risk factors, including diabetes and insulin resistance, cause alarm. The metabolic derangements of obesity increase the bioavailability of estrogen, hyperinsulinemia, and inflammation in a complex system with direct and indirect effects on the endometrium, resulting in proliferation and, ultimately, carcinogenesis. In addition, the gut dysbiosis associated with obesity helps contribute to these metabolic derangements, priming an individual for developing EC and perhaps affecting treatment efficacy. More recent studies are beginning to explore obesity's effect on the local tumor microbiome of EC and its role in carcinogenesis. Significant and sustained weight loss in individuals can considerably decrease the risk of EC, likely through reversal of the altered metabolism and dysbiosis resulting obesity. Bariatric surgery is the gold standard for successful weight loss and highlights how reversing of the systemic effects of obesity can reduce EC risk. However, the current limited availability, knowledge, and imposed stigma of bariatric surgery prohibits population-level reductions in EC. Therefore, effective and maintainable non-surgical dietary and pharmacologic interventions are needed.

Awareness about Gynecologic Cancers and Related Factors among Healthy Women: A Cross-Sectional Study

The risk of cancer-related mortality and morbidity decreases when women are aware of the risk factors for gynecologic cancers and implement strategies such as attending relevant early screening programs. This cross-sectional study conducted between August 2017 and August 2018 at a public hospital in Turkey aimed to determine the awareness about gynecologic cancers among healthy women by utilized the Krieger's ecosocial theory as a framework for the study. The study included 554 Turkish women aged 18-65 years. Data were collected using the Gynecological Cancer Awareness Scale (GCAS) and a questionnaire designed in this study. Significant differences were noted between the average GCAS score and variables such as the amount of menstrual bleeding, entering menopause, a history of reproductive system disease, regular gynecological examination (including Pap test), regular vaginal self-examination, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), genital hygiene behavior, the fear of having cancer, having knowledge about cancer, and requiring information about cancer (p < .05). Despite the high level of awareness about gynecologic cancer among these women, the lack of proper knowledge and preventive measures was high. Having knowledge about gynecologic cancers results in increased awareness; however, the level of knowledge is not sufficient to prevent gynecologic cancers, which shows the need for sufficient and effective cancer screening and education programs.