Intracardiac intravenous leiomyomatosis: diagnosis and management

Update on clinical characteristics and molecular insights for uterine intravenous leiomyomatosis (Review)

Intravenous leiomyomatosis (IVL) is a rare benign disease, which typically develops along vascular vessels and extends to the inferior vena cava and right atrium of the heart. In the early stages of the disease, the clinical manifestations and the results of imaging examinations are not uniform among patients. Thus, a high rate of misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis is common. When the tumor extends along the venous system to the pelvic floor vein or through the inferior vena cava involving the right atrium of the heart or the pulmonary artery, severe symptoms occur, such as ascites, dyspnea, heart failure and even sudden mortality. Improving the understanding of IVL to identify and evaluate this disease in its early stages is important. Complete tumor resection remains the primary treatment option for IVL. The recurrence rate of the disease varies depending on multiple factors, such as type of surgical procedure performed. Therefore, long-term follow-up is necessary for patients with IVL. The review of recent findings on the molecular and clinicopathological characterization of IVL is important to understand the pathogenesis of IVL. In the present study, the clinical manifestations, pathogenesis, differential diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of IVL are summarized in order to provide a single source of insightful information on IVL.

"Evolution" of intravascular leiomyomatosis

BACKGROUND

Intravenous leiomyomatosis (IVL) is a rare and specific type of smooth muscle tumor that is histologically benign but has a malignant biological behavior. It is commonly associated with a history of uterine leiomyomas.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 36-year-old woman, G1P1, presented to the hospital with left lower abdominal pain for 2 months and she has accepted hysteroscopic myomectomy about 1 year ago. Ultrasound venography, echocardiography and computed tomography venography (CTV) of inferior vena cava were performed, which revealed IVL located in left intramural myometrium walls growing along the left ovarian vein reaching the level of the lumbar 5-sacral 1 disc. Laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and hysterectomyis were scheduled. The IVL in the left ovarian vein and parauterine venous plexus were detected and excised completely during surgery. IVL was diagnosed by postoperative pathology and immunohistochemistry. The patient recovered well after surgery. No surgical-related or anesthesia-related complications occurred.The 3-month follow-up CTV of inferior vena cava and echocardiography examination revealed normal.

CONCLUSIONS

The cause of IVL is unknown, this observation demonstrates that hysteroscopic myomectomy might lead to the occurrence of IVL.

Successful one-stage resection of intracardiac intravenous leiomyomatosis: A case report

This case report is about a 47-year-old patient, who was diagnosed with intracardiac intravenous leiomyomatosis and received treatment at our institution. Intravenous leiomyomatosis is a rare, histologically benign, uterine neoplasm, which is characterized by non-invasive intravascular proliferation of smooth muscle cells. Intravenous leiomyomatosis arises from the myometrium and, in its most extensive form, can reach the heart via the pelvic veins and the inferior vena cava, causing hemodynamic complications. Treatment of choice is the complete resection of the tumor, even though there is no consensus on the optimal surgical approach. In this case, complete resection of the tumor was accomplished in a one-stage procedure. The patient recovered well and CT scan did not show any signs of recurrence after five months.

Tumor in Transit: Intracardiac Leiomyomatosis

Intravenous leiomyoma is a rare condition that occurs when there is a vascular invasion of a pre-existing uterine leiomyoma. The tumor can metastasize to structures such as the heart and lungs. We discuss a case of metastasis to the heart resulting in severe tricuspid regurgitation. Surgical intervention is the primary modality; usually a staged approach involving cardiac surgery along with abdominal and/or pelvic surgery. We want to highlight the importance of fully investigating right-sided cardiac masses. While there are common etiologies for these masses, one must maintain a high degree of suspicion for an intravenous leiomyoma, especially if a female has certain risk factors such as a prior history of fibroids or a hysterectomy. We also stress the importance of a multi-disciplinary team approach when providing care to these patients, along with reviewing all modalities of imaging.

Clinical features and prognostic factors analysis of intravenous leiomyomatosis

Background

The treatment and prognostic factors of intravenous leiomyomatosis (IVL) remain lacking systematic evidence.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on IVL patients from the Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, and IVL cases were published in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Descriptive statistics were used for the basic characteristics of patients. The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to assess the high-risk factors related to the progression-free survival (PFS). The comparison of survival curves was performed by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results

A total of 361 IVL patients were included in this study, 38 patients from Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, and 323 patients from the published literature. Age ≤45 years was observed in 173 (47.9%) patients. According to the clinical staging criteria, stage I/II was observed in 125 (34.6%) patients, and stage III/IV was observed in 221 (61.2%) patients. Dyspnea, orthopnea, and cough were observed in 108 (29.9%) patients. Completed tumor resection was observed in 216 (59.8%) patients, and uncompleted tumor resection was observed in 58 (16.1%) patients. Median follow-up period was 12 months (range 0-194 months), and 68 (18.8%) recurrences or deaths were identified. The adjusted multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis showed age ≤45 years (vs. >45) (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-3.80, p = 0.016), and uncompleted tumor resection (vs. completed tumor resection) (HR = 22.03, 95% CI 8.31-58.36, p < 0.001) were high-risk factors related to the PFS.

Conclusion

Patients with IVL have a high probability of recurrence after surgery and a poor prognosis. Patients younger than 45 years and with uncompleted tumor resection are at higher risk of postoperative recurrence or death.

Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in intravenous leiomyomatosis: a single-center experiences

Objective

Intravenous leiomyomatosis (IVL) is a rare disease, and few studies have focused on the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in this condition. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of CEUS in IVL and summarize the specific CEUS characteristics of IVL.

Materials and Method

From December 2016 to March 2021, 93 patients admitted to our hospital with inferior vena cava (IVC) occupying lesions were prospectively enrolled and underwent detailed ultrasound multi-modality examinations, including conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound scans. The diagnostic value of CEUS and conventional ultrasound (CU) in IVL was compared, and the specific IVL signs were summarized.

Results

Among the 93 patients with inferior vena cava mass, 67 were IVL while 26 were non-IVL. The inter-observer agreement of the two senior doctors was good, with Kappa coefficient = 0.71 (95% CI: 0.572–0.885). The area under the ROC curve of CU for IVL diagnosis was 0.652 (95% CI: 0.528–0.776), and its sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, missed diagnosis rate, and misdiagnosis rate were 61.1%, 69.2%, 63.4%, 83.7%, 40.9%, 38.8%, and 30.8%, respectively. The area under curve (AUC) for IVL diagnosis by CEUS was 0.807 (95% CI: 0.701–0.911), and the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, missed diagnosis rate, and misdiagnosis rate were 82.0%, 84.6%, 82.8%, 93.2%, 64.7%, 15.4%, and 17.9%, respectively. In CEUS mode, “sieve hole sign” and “multi-track sign” were detected in 57 lesions, and the detected rate was higher than that of CU (https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1014187 < 0.01).

Conclusion

CEUS can better show the fine blood flow inside the IVL, which is important for IVL differential diagnosis. Moreover, CEUS can obtain more information about IVL diagnosis than CU, compensating for the shortcomings of CU in detecting more blood flow within the lesion. Thus, this technique has great significance for IVL diagnosis.