Psychosexual morbidity in women with ovarian cancer

The effectiveness of psychological interventions for reducing poor body image in endometriosis, PCOS and other gynaecological conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Gynaecological conditions (e.g., endometriosis, PCOS) result in bodily changes that negatively impact body image. Psychological interventions (e.g., CBT, psychoeducation) have shown promise in reviews with the general population for alleviating body image concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide asynthesis of the impact of psychological interventions for reducing body image concerns for individuals with gynaecological conditions. Electronic databases were searched for relevant psychological intervention studies with body image outcomes. Twenty-one eligible studies were included in the systematic review (ten were included in a random-effects meta-analysis). Studies included participants (N = 1483, M = 71.85, SD = 52.79) with a range of gynaecological conditions, ages (Mage = 35.08, SD = 12.17) and cultural backgrounds. Most included studies reported at least one positive effect with the meta-analysis indicating psychological interventions were moderately superior to control conditions for reducing body image concerns (SMD -.41, 95% CI [-0.20 -0.62]). However, there was a high risk of bias and moderate heterogeneity. Results suggest psychological interventions may hold promise for reducing body image concerns among individuals gynaecological conditions in the short term. Further, preliminary support was found for the use of theory-guided psychological interventions delivered in group settings in particular, with further research needed on optimal intervention length and particular psychotherapeutic approach.

The effectiveness of digital psychosocial interventions on psychological distress, depression, anxiety, and health-related quality of life in patients with gynaecological cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Patients with gynaecological cancer often experience psychological issues due to multiple stressors. Psychological disturbances have debilitating effects on patients with gynaecological cancer. In recent decades, digital psychosocial interventions have rapidly advanced and been incorporated into mental health interventions. Digital psychosocial interventions could provide patients with several benefits over traditional in-person interventions, including convenience, anonymity, flexible scheduling, and geographic mobility. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the effectiveness of digital psychosocial intervention in reducing psychological distress, depression, and anxiety and improving health-related quality of life in patients with gynaecological cancer.

METHODS

Three-step extensive search was performed on 22 December 2022 from nine bibliographic databases, trial registries and grey literature. Experimental studies involving patients with gynaecological cancer utilizing digital psychosocial interventions for the improvement of mental health outcomes were included. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software. Heterogeneity was analysed by Cochran's Q test and I2. Subgroup analyses were attempted to evaluate relative effect sizes of subgroup features.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis of nine studies revealed small effect size in reduction of depression post-intervention (d = 0.24, 95% CI - 0.46 to - 0.02) and medium effect size in reduction of psychological distress post-intervention (d = 0.51, 95% CI - 0.81 to - 0.21) and follow-up (d = 0.65, 95% CI - 1.25 to - 0.05) compared to the control group. The effects of digital psychosocial interventions on anxiety and health-related quality of life were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Digital psychosocial interventions probably reduced psychological distress and slightly reduced depression amongst patients with gynaecological cancer compared to the control group, which can be integrated into clinical practice. Additional trials with rigorous methodology and bigger sample sizes are needed to validate findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42023389502).

Sexuality as a Prognostic Factor-Results of an Individual Patient Data NOGGO (North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology)-Meta-Analysis of 644 Recurrent Ovarian Cancer Patients Prior to Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyze the associations between sexuality, quality of life, treatment discontinuation, and survival in recurrent ovarian cancer (OC).

METHODS

Raw data from various phase II/III studies, including the questionnaires EORTC-QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OV28, were included. Data from the meta-analysis were calculated using logistic and Cox regression.

RESULTS

Data on sexuality were available for 644 patients. A total of 162 patients had an interest in sex and were sexually active (Group A). A total of 45 patients had an interest in sex and were sexually not active (Group I) and 437 patients had no interest in sex and were not sexually active (Group N). Group A was younger in median age (age at randomization), at 57 years, than Group I, at 60 years, and Group N, at 65 years (p < 0.001). Group A had a better ECOG performance status and fewer recurrences (all p < 0.001). FIGO stage, grading, and BMI were not associated with interest in sex and sexual activity. Group A showed higher scores in role, body, and social function (all p < 0.001), emotional functionality (p < 0.002), and body image (p = 0.012). In addition, Group A reported less pain, less peripheral neuropathy, and less fatigue (all p < 0.001). There was no association with the premature discontinuation of chemotherapy. Group A showed better survival rates compared to group N (22.3 months vs. 17.4 months, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians should routinely address the topic of sexuality with ovarian cancer patients. Sexuality appears to be a marker for quality of life as well as overall survival.

Multilevel Determinants of Palliative Care Referral in Women With Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Scoping Review

CONTEXT

Receipt of palliative care (PC) has long been suggested in practice for patients with advanced cancer for improved quality of life, mood, and prolonged survival. However, PC referrals in women with ovarian cancer remain suboptimal.

OBJECTIVE

To consolidate existing literature on the multiple factors associated with PC referrals in women with advanced ovarian cancer and to better understand the contextual factors of PC referrals and frame receipt of PC using a socioecological model.

METHODS

A search of scientific databases was conducted, including PubMed, Embase, CINAHL Complete, and PsycINFO. Key search terms included "ovarian cancer" and "palliative care," and later refined to include advanced stages of the diagnosis. The reviewed articles included a focus on advanced ovarian cancer and reported demographic, medical/clinical, support, or system-level factors examined in the PC referral process.

RESULTS

Thirteen articles focused on the factors directly associated with PC referrals. Factors were categorized into different socioecological levels: tumor-level, intrapersonal, interpersonal, and environmental. Factors included tumor characteristics, age, marital status, medical condition, performance status, psychosocial status, support system, provider, and infrastructure. The patient's medical condition was the major component considered in PC referral and care transition.

CONCLUSION

Various factors in the socioecological framework suggest that the decision for PC referral could be multifactorial and influenced by factors beyond the medical condition and status. Future research should aim to understand the impact of various socioecological factors on PC referral and examine PC referral experiences from the patient's perspective.

Factors Predicting the Health Status of Women with Ovarian Cancer During Five Treatment Phases

OBJECTIVE

The combined impact of disease status and treatment phase on the quality of life (QoL) of women with ovarian cancer has not been fully considered. Therefore, this clinical, epidemiologic study compared the QoL of patients with ovarian cancer between five different treatment phases and identified the factors predicting their QoL through multivariate modeling.

DATA SOURCES

This study had a cross-sectional survey design. The participants total of 183 were recruited from the inpatient and outpatient departments of the medical center in northern Taiwan. QoL was measured using the Quality of Life Scales QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OV28 and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. The patient's clinical characteristics data were obtained from the databank of the Taiwan Gynecologic Cancer Network, a registry of active patients being treated with gynecologic cancer.

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapeutic agents were the major predictors of poor global health status in patients with ovarian cancer. However, good sleep was beneficial to patients' QoL. The study results can be used as a reference to adjust oncological treatment regimens for more effective symptom management and to promote patient education to improve patients' QoL.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

The predicting factors can be considered by physicians and nurses to adjust treatment regimens and enhance patient education.

Sexual Function and Quality of Life Among Turkish Oncology Patients Receiving Chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Sexual health and sexual function in oncology patients are inseparable elements of general quality of life and important indicators of emotional well-being. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the quality of life and sexual function of oncology patients receiving chemotherapy.

DATA SOURCES

This cross-sectional and correlational study was conducted within the chemotherapy unit of a university hospital between June 25, 2017, and June 21, 2018. A total of 410 oncology outpatients participated in this study. Data were collected using the FACT-G Quality of Life Evaluation Scale, the Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale, and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale.

CONCLUSION

A negative and weak statistically significant relationship between the Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale total score and the FACT-G Quality of Life Evaluation Scale total score was found (r = -0.224, P < .01). The regression model where the FACT-G Quality of Life Evaluation Scale total scores (F = 3.263; P < .001) and Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale total scores (F = 8.937; P < .001) of the patients were taken as dependent variables and their sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were taken as independent variables was found to be statistically significant.

IMPLICATION FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Psychosocial and medical evaluation should be performed when a concern or problem regarding the sexual life of an oncology patient is detected. The sexual quality of life of oncology patients should be improved through sexual counseling and education. Patients and their families should be encouraged to participate in family support programs.

Sexual Dysfunction in Women with Cancer: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies

BACKGROUND

Several factors affect sexual function, including cancer development and treatment. This study summarized the risk of women with cancer of developing sexual dysfunctions.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). We searched the EMBASE, PubMed, LILACS, SciELO, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science databases using the descriptors cancer, neoplasms, sexual dysfunction, sexual function, and women. The Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies assessed the quality of studies.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included in this review. Women with cancer presented sexual dysfunctions in 14 out of 16 included studies. The incidence of sexual dysfunctions ranged from 30% to 80%, while the risk of developing sexual dysfunction increased 2.7- and 3.5-fold in women with cervical and breast cancer, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Different cancer treatments increase the risk of developing sexual dysfunction in women, especially desire, arousal, and orgasm, leading to biopsychosocial changes in the health of this population.

Psychosexual Morbidity in Women With Ovarian Cancer: Evaluation by Germline BRCA Gene Mutational Status

Introduction

Up to 75% of women with ovarian cancer experience psychosexual morbidity and approximately 15–20% of women with ovarian cancer have a germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm). However, psychosexual morbidity remains unexplored in women with gBRCAm ovarian cancer.

Aim

Given their younger age, genetic diagnosis, breast cancer risk, and increased prevalence of surgically-induced menopause, we aim to assess whether women with gBRCAm ovarian cancer experience distinct psychosexual morbidity.

Methods

Psychosexual morbidity was investigated in 2 cohorts of women with ovarian cancer: women with gBRCAm ovarian cancer vs women with gBRCA wildtype (gBRCAwt) ovarian cancer. Between August 2019 and March 2020, women with high-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary, Fallopian tube or primary peritoneum were approached in clinic or telephoned and invited to take part. Exclusion criteria included: women with alternative histology; women admitted from clinic; and women who lacked capacity to independently complete the questionnaire. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and background information were collected at a single time-point per patient. Scores below 26.55 were interpreted to suggest psychosexual dysfunction.

Main Outcome Measure

Responses including total and domain FSFI scores, self-reported psychosexual problems and interest in psychosexual support were compared.

Results

Of 103 women approached, 53% returned questionnaires. In this exploratory analysis, women with gBRCAm ovarian cancer were significantly younger (51–60 years vs 61–70 years, gBRCAwt, P = .010). There was a trend towards increased prevalence of surgical menopause (57% vs 27%, P = .097) and breast surgery (53% vs 22%, P = .132, gBRCAm vs gBRCAwt, respectively). Women with gBRCAm ovarian cancer scored higher in the FSFI questionnaire, particularly women under 60 years (15.1 vs 2.7, P = .070), approaching significance. Women with gBRCAm ovarian cancer expressed more interest for face-to-face services (P = .018), especially psychosexual therapy (65% vs 30%) and more often felt the service was insufficient, approaching significance (71% vs 44%, gBRCAm vs gBRCAwt, respectively, P = .076).

Conclusion

Women with gBRCAm ovarian cancer are younger, express more interest for specialist psychosexual support and potentially different psychosexual problems, warranting further exploration.

Logue C, Pugh J, Foden P, et al., Psychosexual Morbidity in Women With Ovarian Cancer: Evaluation by Germline BRCA Gene Mutational Status. Sex Med 2022;10:100465.

Areas to Improve Quality of Life After Ovarian Tumor Surgery and Adjuvant Treatment

BACKGROUND/AIM

To evaluate quality of life (QoL) in women treated for ovarian tumors one year after laparotomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The validated quality of life questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OV28) were sent to women who had undergone laparotomy due to ovarian tumors 12 months after surgery. The answers were analyzed and grouped according to the ovarian tumor histology (benign, borderline and cancer).

RESULTS

A total of 621 patients (87.5% out of 710) agreed to participate in the study. Ovarian cancer patients experienced statistically worse QoL one year after laparotomy in several analyzed parameters, including financial difficulties, compared to patients treated for benign and borderline tumors.

CONCLUSION

Women with ovarian cancer still need further cancer rehabilitation and support one year after diagnosis to improve their QoL. The novel finding was that ovarian cancer patients suffered from financial difficulties even in a free of charge health care system.