1
|
Crossley RE, Bokkers EAM, Browne N, Sugrue K, Kennedy E, Conneely M. Risk factors associated with indicators of dairy cow welfare during the housing period in Irish, spring-calving, hybrid pasture-based systems. Prev Vet Med 2022; 208:105760. [PMID: 36181750 DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
In a dairy production system where cows are grazing for a large portion of their lactation, little attention has been afforded to investigating multiple indicators of welfare for risk factors associated with the housing period. Yet regardless of the length of the housing period, cows still experience the positive and negative welfare impacts of both indoor and outdoor environments in a hybrid system. Thus, the objective of this study was to identify risk factors for indicators of dairy cow welfare during the housing period in a spring-calving, hybrid pasture-based system. Herd-level scores for seven indicators of welfare (locomotion, body condition, ocular and nasal discharge, integument damage, tail injury and human avoidance response) were collected from 82 Irish dairy farms during the housing period (October - February). Data were analysed using multiple beta regression or zero-inflated beta regression to identify associations between these welfare indicators and measured herd-level housing, resource and management factors. Thirty-six unique risk factors were associated with one or more welfare indicators (P < 0.05). Analyses identified two risk factors for body condition < 3.0 and four for body condition > 3.5, the target range during the housing period. Four risk factors were identified for each of ocular discharge, nasal discharge and avoidance response of > 1 m from human approach. Six risk factors each were associated with the proportion of lame cows and integument damage to the head-neck-back or hindquarter regions. The greatest number of risk factors, 12, were associated with tail injury (broken, lacerated or incomplete tails). Risk factors associated with multiple indicators of welfare were cow comfort index (tail lacerations and hindquarter integument damage), cubicle width (broken and incomplete tails), shed floor slipperiness (lameness and head-neck-back integument damage), shed light-level (tail lacerations, avoidance response and below target body condition), shed passage width (broken tails and head-neck-back integument damage) and presence (incomplete tails) or absence (broken tails) of a collecting yard backing gate. With the large number of risk factors associated with tail injury, continued research is necessary to identify causes and determine prevention methods to contribute to improved overall welfare of dairy cows. Housing features meeting recommended guidelines from the literature were frequently associated with greater negative indicators of welfare. In light of this, housing guidelines may benefit from regular re-evaluation to ensure facilities meet the welfare needs of cows during the housing period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R E Crossley
- Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork P61 C996, Ireland; Animal Production Systems group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen 6700 AH, the Netherlands.
| | - E A M Bokkers
- Animal Production Systems group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen 6700 AH, the Netherlands.
| | - N Browne
- Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork P61 C996, Ireland; School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough LE12 5RD, United Kingdom.
| | - K Sugrue
- Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork P61 C996, Ireland.
| | - E Kennedy
- Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork P61 C996, Ireland.
| | - M Conneely
- Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork P61 C996, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Crossley R, Bokkers E, Browne N, Sugrue K, Kennedy E, Engel B, Conneely M. Risk factors associated with the welfare of grazing dairy cows in spring-calving, hybrid pasture-based systems. Prev Vet Med 2022; 204:105640. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
3
|
Redfern EA, Sinclair LA, Robinson PA. Why isn't the transition period getting the attention it deserves? Farm advisors' opinions and experiences of managing dairy cow health in the transition period. Prev Vet Med 2021; 194:105424. [PMID: 34298302 DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
During the transition period three weeks before and after calving the dairy cow is at greater risk of developing disease, to the detriment of welfare and production. An understanding of the reasons why and how farmers and their advisors engage in efforts to control metabolic disease during the transition period is required if these diseases are to be more successfully controlled. The study reported here, based on interview research, investigates the opinions and behaviours of farm advisors on transition cow management and nutrition, their experiences of working with their respective farm clients, and interactions with other farm advisors to help manage transition cow health and productivity. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 veterinary advisors and 12 non-veterinary advisors (nutritionists, feed company representatives and independent consultants) in England. A key theme emerging from this qualitative data was a perceived lack of focussed transition management advice provided by advisors. Reasons for suboptimal or lack of appropriate advice included: time pressures for advisors to visit as many farms as possible; avoiding the investigation of areas of potential improvement, for fear of not meeting transition health and performance targets; financial disincentives for nutritionists, as the sales commission attributed to transition cow feeding was small relative to the main milking herd; and a lack of confidence in the subject. Other aspects included the responsibility of providing transition advice which was perceived to be high-risk, a lack of cooperation between veterinarians and nutritionists, and the perceived varying competencies of nutritionists. The findings demonstrate the importance of the varied influences of 'people factors' on transition cow health such as the nature of the advisor-farmer relationship, advisor-farmer communication and herd-level advisor collaboration on transition cow health and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma A Redfern
- Department of Veterinary Health and Animal Sciences, Harper Adams University, Newport, Shropshire, TF10 8NB, UK.
| | - Liam A Sinclair
- Department of Agriculture and Environment, Harper Adams University, Newport, Shropshire, TF10 8NB, UK
| | - Philip A Robinson
- Department of Veterinary Health and Animal Sciences, Harper Adams University, Newport, Shropshire, TF10 8NB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Crossley RE, Bokkers EAM, Browne N, Sugrue K, Kennedy E, de Boer IJM, Conneely M. Assessing dairy cow welfare during the grazing and housing periods on spring-calving, pasture-based dairy farms. J Anim Sci 2021; 99:6184570. [PMID: 33758924 PMCID: PMC8139317 DOI: 10.1093/jas/skab093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The different periods characterizing spring-calving, pasture-based dairy systems common in Ireland have seldom been the focus of large-scale dairy cow welfare research. Thus, the aim of this study was to devise and conduct an animal-based welfare assessment during both the grazing and housing periods on spring-calving, pasture-based dairy farms, to identify areas for improvement and establish benchmarks for indicators of good welfare. Assessment of seven animal-based welfare indicators was conducted during two visits (one each at grazing and housing) to 82 commercial dairy farms in southern Ireland. Herd-level descriptive statistics were performed for all welfare indicators at each visit, and differences between visits were analyzed using paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. A mean of 9% and 10% clinically lame cows (mobility scores 2 and 3) were observed at housing and grazing, respectively. Recommended body condition scores (BCS) were not met for a mean of 13% of cows at grazing and 23% at housing, with more over-conditioned cows present at housing than grazing (P < 0.001). Ocular discharge was uncommon in both periods. Prevalence of moderate and severe nasal discharge combined was lower during housing (5%) than grazing (7%). In both periods, similar mean levels of tail injury were observed: 2% to 3% of cows with tail lacerations, 9% with broken tails, and 8% (measured at housing only) with docked tails. Integument alterations involved primarily hair loss and were most prevalent on the hindquarters (26%) during grazing and on the head–neck–back (66%) and the hindquarter (32%) regions during housing. Cows displayed an avoidance distance of >1 m (indicative of a fearful response) from an approaching human in an average of 82% of grazing cows and 42% to 75% of housed cows, dependent on test location. Opportunities to improve welfare in this system were identified in the areas of tail injury prevention, nasal health, and the management of indoor housing and feeding. The performance of the top 20% of farms for each welfare indicator was used to establish benchmarks of: 0% to 5% clinical lameness, 0% to 12% of cows outside recommended BCS, 0% to 27% ocular discharge, 2% to 16% nasal discharge, 0% tail lacerations and docked tails, 0% to 3% tail breaks, 0% to 14% integument alterations, and 4% to 74% for avoidance distance of >1 m. These represent attainable targets for spring-calving pasture-based farms to promote good dairy cow welfare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin E Crossley
- Teagasc, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork P61 C996, Ireland.,Animal Production Systems Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Eddie A M Bokkers
- Animal Production Systems Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Natasha Browne
- Teagasc, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork P61 C996, Ireland.,School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, United Kingdom
| | - Katie Sugrue
- Teagasc, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork P61 C996, Ireland
| | - Emer Kennedy
- Teagasc, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork P61 C996, Ireland
| | - Imke J M de Boer
- Animal Production Systems Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Muireann Conneely
- Teagasc, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork P61 C996, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Redfern EA, Sinclair LA, Robinson PA. Dairy cow health and management in the transition period: The need to understand the human dimension. Res Vet Sci 2021; 137:94-101. [PMID: 33940352 DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2021.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
During the transition from the dry period to lactation the dairy cow undergoes a period of physiological, metabolic and immunological change, and is at greater risk of developing disease, to the detriment of health, welfare and production. Many studies have been undertaken to determine appropriate management strategies to improve health and welfare during the transition period, however the incidence of disease, particularly metabolic disease, in this period remains high. To date, a lack of research attention has been paid to the social factors which may affect the management of transition dairy cows. An understanding of farmer and advisor attitudes and behaviour, and the challenges they face in managing transition cows, may help to direct farmers towards more effective disease prevention and control. It is also possible that transition cow morbidity may be due to complex interactions that are difficult to manage, despite efforts to implement best practice. This review paper provides a brief overview of some of the management factors that may influence herd health during the transition period. It then investigates how social influences may relate to the uptake of transition management practices by exploring the use of qualitative interviews investigating farmer and stakeholder attitudes and behaviour in relation to cattle health and welfare, before focussing more specifically on farmer behaviour. Additionally, this paper explores farm advisor behaviour, and how that has been shown to influence farmer adherence to advice, which has particular relevance to transition cow management. It then suggests potential research strategies to investigate the human influences affecting the scale of the problem that may provide solutions to tackle the challenge of improving dairy cow health and welfare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma A Redfern
- Department of Veterinary Health and Animal Sciences, Harper Adams University, Newport, Shropshire TF10 8NB, United Kingdom.
| | - Liam A Sinclair
- Department of Agriculture and Environment, Harper Adams University, Newport, Shropshire TF10 8NB, United Kingdom
| | - Philip A Robinson
- Department of Veterinary Health and Animal Sciences, Harper Adams University, Newport, Shropshire TF10 8NB, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Association of Oxidative Stress Biomarkers and Clinical Mastitis Incidence in Dairy Cows During the Periparturient Period. J Vet Res 2020; 64:421-425. [PMID: 32984633 PMCID: PMC7497760 DOI: 10.2478/jvetres-2020-0053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The aim of this study was to determine changes of reactive oxygen species (ROS), serum antioxidant capacity (SAC), oxidative stress index (OSi), and α-tocopherol (α-T) during the periparturient period in healthy and mastitic cows and to further investigate whether these parameters can be used as a tool for identifying cows at higher risk of developing mastitis. Material and Methods Blood samples from 110 dairy cows from two commercial farms were obtained at dry-off, calving, and 30 days post-partum. Healthy cows formed group A (n = 90) and mastitic cows B (n = 20). Blood serum was obtained by centrifugation, and the aforementioned parameters were determined. A general linear model was used for analysing the associations among the determined blood parameters, the health of the animals’ udder, and the sampling time. Results ROS and OSi values were higher (P < 0.001) by a respective 14% and 26%, and SAC values lower (P < 0.001) by 10% in group B than in group A at calving. ROC curve analysis revealed that all determined parameters at calving and α-T at dry-off and 30 days post-partum had excellent or acceptable predicting ability for mastitis incidence. Conclusion This information provides a tool for early identification of cows at high risk of developing mastitis, allowing the implementation of intervention strategies.
Collapse
|
7
|
Mills KE, Weary DM, von Keyserlingk MA. Identifying barriers to successful dairy cow transition management. J Dairy Sci 2020; 103:1749-1758. [DOI: 10.3168/jds.2018-16231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2018] [Accepted: 09/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
8
|
Rørvang M, Herskin M, Jensen M. Dairy cows with prolonged calving seek additional isolation. J Dairy Sci 2017; 100:2967-2975. [DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-11989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2016] [Accepted: 12/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|