1
|
Schellenberg M, Inaba K, Chen J, Bardes JM, Crow E, Lam L, Benjamin E, Demetriades D. Falls in the Bathroom: A Mechanism of Injury for All Ages. J Surg Res 2018; 234:283-286. [PMID: 30527486 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2018] [Revised: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 09/12/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND When ground-level falls occur in the bathroom, there is particular potential for morbidity and mortality given the high density of hard surfaces. Risk factors are not clearly defined by the existing literature. The objective of this study was to define the epidemiology, injury patterns, and outcomes after falls in the bathroom. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients presenting to LAC+USC Medical Center (01/2008-05/2015) after a fall in the bathroom (ICD-9 code E884.6) were included. Demographics, injury data, investigations, procedures, and outcomes were collected. RESULTS Fifty-seven patients were included, with mean age 45 y (range 0-92). All ages were affected, with ages 41-60 y at highest risk. Common comorbidities included cardiovascular disease (n = 23, 40%), neuromuscular disorders (n = 13, 23%), and diabetes (n = 9, 16%). Ten patients (18%) were intoxicated. Home medications included antihypertensives (n = 18, 32%), antipsychotics (n = 9, 16%), and anticoagulants (n = 8, 14%). Common investigations included X-rays (n = 41, 72%) and CT scans of the head (n = 20, 35%). The most frequent injuries were contusion/laceration (n = 45, 79%), fracture (n = 12, 21%), and traumatic brain injury (n = 7, 12%). Most patients did not require hospital admission (n = 46, 81%), although 4 (7%) needed intensive care unit care and operative intervention (ORIF [n = 2, 4%] or craniectomy [n = 2, 4%]). Mortality was low (n = 1, 2%). Most patients were discharged home (n = 40, 70%). CONCLUSIONS All ages, especially 41-60 y, are susceptible to falls in the bathroom. Despite the potential for serious injury, most do not require hospital admission. Risk factors include drugs/alcohol, cardiovascular disease, neuromuscular disorders, and diabetes. Efforts to minimize fall risk should be directed toward these individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan Schellenberg
- Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, LAC+USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Kenji Inaba
- Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, LAC+USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
| | - Jessica Chen
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - James M Bardes
- Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, LAC+USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Elizabeth Crow
- Department of Emergency Medicine, LAC+USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Lydia Lam
- Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, LAC+USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Elizabeth Benjamin
- Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, LAC+USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Demetrios Demetriades
- Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, LAC+USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hutton JS, Phelan K, Horowitz-Kraus T, Dudley J, Altaye M, DeWitt T, Holland SK. Shared Reading Quality and Brain Activation during Story Listening in Preschool-Age Children. J Pediatr 2017; 191:204-211.e1. [PMID: 29173308 PMCID: PMC5728185 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.08.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2017] [Revised: 07/07/2017] [Accepted: 08/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the relationship between maternal shared reading quality (verbal interactivity and engagement) and brain function during story listening in at-risk, preschool-age children, in the context of behavioral evidence and American Academy of Pediatrics, recommendations. STUDY DESIGN In this cross-sectional study, 22 healthy, 4-year-old girls from low socioeconomic status households completed functional magnetic resonance imaging using an established story listening task, followed by videotaped observation of uncoached mother-daughter reading of the same, age-appropriate picture book. Shared reading quality was independently scored applying dialogic reading and other evidence-based criteria reflecting interactivity and engagement, and applied as a predictor of neural activation during the functional magnetic resonance imaging task, controlling for income and maternal education. RESULTS Shared reading quality scores were generally low and negatively correlated with maternal distraction by smartphones (P < .05). Scores were positively correlated with activation in left-sided brain areas supporting expressive and complex language, social-emotional integration, and working memory (P <.05, false discovery rate corrected). CONCLUSIONS Maternal shared reading quality is positively correlated with brain activation supporting complex language, executive function, and social-emotional processing in at-risk, preschool-age children. These findings represent novel neural biomarkers of how this modifiable aspect of home reading environment may influence foundational emergent literacy skills, reinforce behavioral evidence and American Academy of Pediatrics, recommendations, and underscore the potential of dialogic reading interventions to promote healthy brain development, especially in at-risk households.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John S. Hutton
- Division of General and Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH,Reading and Literacy Discovery Center, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Kieran Phelan
- Division of General and Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Tzipi Horowitz-Kraus
- Division of General and Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH,Reading and Literacy Discovery Center, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH,Pediatric Neuroimaging Research Consortium, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH,Communication Sciences Research Center, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Jonathan Dudley
- Reading and Literacy Discovery Center, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH,Communication Sciences Research Center, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Mekibib Altaye
- Pediatric Neuroimaging Research Consortium, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH,Division of Radiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH,Communication Sciences Research Center, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Tom DeWitt
- Division of General and Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH,Reading and Literacy Discovery Center, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Scott K. Holland
- Reading and Literacy Discovery Center, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH,Pediatric Neuroimaging Research Consortium, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH,Division of Radiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH,Communication Sciences Research Center, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kendrick D, Ablewhite J, Achana F, Benford P, Clacy R, Coffey F, Cooper N, Coupland C, Deave T, Goodenough T, Hawkins A, Hayes M, Hindmarch P, Hubbard S, Kay B, Kumar A, Majsak-Newman G, McColl E, McDaid L, Miller P, Mulvaney C, Peel I, Pitchforth E, Reading R, Saramago P, Stewart J, Sutton A, Timblin C, Towner E, Watson MC, Wynn P, Young B, Zou K. Keeping Children Safe: a multicentre programme of research to increase the evidence base for preventing unintentional injuries in the home in the under-fives. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2017. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar05140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundUnintentional injuries among 0- to 4-year-olds are a major public health problem incurring substantial NHS, individual and societal costs. However, evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of preventative interventions is lacking.AimTo increase the evidence base for thermal injury, falls and poisoning prevention for the under-fives.MethodsSix work streams comprising five multicentre case–control studies assessing risk and protective factors, a study measuring quality of life and injury costs, national surveys of children’s centres, interviews with children’s centre staff and parents, a systematic review of barriers to, and facilitators of, prevention and systematic overviews, meta-analyses and decision analyses of home safety interventions. Evidence from these studies informed the design of an injury prevention briefing (IPB) for children’s centres for preventing fire-related injuries and implementation support (training and facilitation). This was evaluated by a three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial comparing IPB and support (IPB+), IPB only (no support) and usual care. The primary outcome was parent-reported possession of a fire escape plan. Evidence from all work streams subsequently informed the design of an IPB for preventing thermal injuries, falls and poisoning.ResultsModifiable risk factors for falls, poisoning and scalds were found. Most injured children and their families incurred small to moderate health-care and non-health-care costs, with a few incurring more substantial costs. Meta-analyses and decision analyses found that home safety interventions increased the use of smoke alarms and stair gates, promoted safe hot tap water temperatures, fire escape planning and storage of medicines and household products, and reduced baby walker use. Generally, more intensive interventions were the most effective, but these were not always the most cost-effective interventions. Children’s centre and parental barriers to, and facilitators of, injury prevention were identified. Children’s centres were interested in preventing injuries, and believed that they could prevent them, but few had an evidence-based strategic approach and they needed support to develop this. The IPB was implemented by children’s centres in both intervention arms, with greater implementation in the IPB+ arm. Compared with usual care, more IPB+ arm families received advice on key safety messages, and more families in each intervention arm attended fire safety sessions. The intervention did not increase the prevalence of fire escape plans [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) IPB only vs. usual care 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 1.49; AOR IPB+ vs. usual care 1.41, 95% CI 0.91 to 2.20] but did increase the proportion of families reporting more fire escape behaviours (AOR IPB only vs. usual care 2.56, 95% CI 1.38 to 4.76; AOR IPB+ vs. usual care 1.78, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.15). IPB-only families were less likely to report match play by children (AOR 0.27, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.94) and reported more bedtime fire safety routines (AOR for a 1-unit increase in the number of routines 1.59, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.31) than usual-care families. The IPB-only intervention was less costly and marginally more effective than usual care. The IPB+ intervention was more costly and marginally more effective than usual care.LimitationsOur case–control studies demonstrate associations between modifiable risk factors and injuries but not causality. Some injury cost estimates are imprecise because of small numbers. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were limited by the quality of the included studies, the small numbers of studies reporting outcomes and significant heterogeneity, partly explained by differences in interventions. Network meta-analysis (NMA) categorised interventions more finely, but some variation remained. Decision analyses are likely to underestimate cost-effectiveness for a number of reasons. IPB implementation varied between children’s centres. Greater implementation may have resulted in changes in more fire safety behaviours.ConclusionsOur studies provide new evidence about the effectiveness of, as well as economic evaluation of, home safety interventions. Evidence-based resources for preventing thermal injuries, falls and scalds were developed. Providing such resources to children’s centres increases their injury prevention activity and some parental safety behaviours.Future workFurther randomised controlled trials, meta-analyses and NMAs are needed to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home safety interventions. Further work is required to measure NHS, family and societal costs and utility decrements for childhood home injuries and to evaluate complex multicomponent interventions such as home safety schemes using a single analytical model.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN65067450 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01452191.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full inProgramme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 5, No. 14. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise Kendrick
- Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Joanne Ablewhite
- Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Felix Achana
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Penny Benford
- Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Rose Clacy
- Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Frank Coffey
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Nicola Cooper
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Carol Coupland
- Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Toity Deave
- Centre for Child and Adolescent Health, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Trudy Goodenough
- Centre for Child and Adolescent Health, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Adrian Hawkins
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Mike Hayes
- Child Accident Prevention Trust, London, UK
| | - Paul Hindmarch
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Stephanie Hubbard
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Bryony Kay
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Arun Kumar
- Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Elaine McColl
- Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Lisa McDaid
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - Phil Miller
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Isabel Peel
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Richard Reading
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
- Norfolk Community Health and Care NHS Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - Pedro Saramago
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Jane Stewart
- Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Alex Sutton
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Clare Timblin
- Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Elizabeth Towner
- Centre for Child and Adolescent Health, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael C Watson
- Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Persephone Wynn
- Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ben Young
- Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kun Zou
- Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ehrhardt J, Xu Y, Khoury J, Yolton K, Lanphear B, Phelan K. Cognitive and motor abilities of young children and risk of injuries in the home. Inj Prev 2016; 23:16-21. [PMID: 27435102 DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2016] [Revised: 06/23/2016] [Accepted: 06/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Residential injury is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in US children. Rates and types of injury vary by child age but little is known about injury risk based on child cognitive and motor abilities. The objective of this study was to determine whether cognitive or motor development in young children is associated with residential injury. METHODS We employed data from Health Outcomes and Measures of the Environment (HOME) Study. Parent report of medically attended injury was obtained at regular intervals from 0 to 42 months. Child development was assessed at 12, 24 and 36 months using Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 2nd edition, which generates both mental developmental index (MDI) and a psychomotor developmental index (PDI). Injury risk was modelled using multivariable logistic regression as function of child's MDI or PDI. Effects of MDI and PDI on injury risk were examined separately and jointly, adjusting for important covariates. RESULTS Children with cognitive delay (MDI <77) were at significantly higher risk of injury than children without cognitive delay (OR=3.7, 95% CI 1.4 to 10.5, p=0.012). There was no significant association of PDI with injury. There was, however, significant interaction of MDI and PDI (p=0.02); children with cognitive delay but normal motor development were at significantly higher risk of injury than children with normal cognitive and motor development (OR=9.6, 95% CI 2.6 to 35.8, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS Children with cognitive delays, especially those with normal motor development, are at elevated risk for residential injuries. Injury prevention efforts should target children with developmental delays. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER NCT00129324; post-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Ehrhardt
- Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Yingying Xu
- Division of General and Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Jane Khoury
- Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Kimberly Yolton
- Division of General and Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Bruce Lanphear
- Child and Family Research Institute, BC Children's and Women's Hospital and Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kieran Phelan
- Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Parmeswaran GG, Kalaivani M, Gupta SK, Goswami AK, Nongkynrih B. Assessment of home hazards for childhood injuries in an urban population in New Delhi. Child Care Health Dev 2016; 42:473-7. [PMID: 26892878 DOI: 10.1111/cch.12328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2015] [Revised: 01/06/2016] [Accepted: 01/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Childhood injuries, especially the unintentional category of injuries, occur most commonly in the environment inside a child's home. The primary objective of the present study was to assess the presence of home hazards for childhood injuries in households in an urban resettlement colony in New Delhi. METHODS A community-based cross-sectional study was carried out in an urban resettlement colony in Delhi. A hazards assessment tool was used to check the presence of hazards in the houses. RESULTS A total of 225 households were included. It was seen that121 (53.7%) had a cooking stove within the reach of the child, and 190 (84.3%) had the gas pipe within reach. Fire hazard was seen in 84% of houses. About 78% of households did not have locked storage for chemicals. CONCLUSION The study revealed a significant burden of hazards for childhood injuries within their own homes, thus emphasizing the need for injury prevention interventions to reduce the number of hazards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G G Parmeswaran
- Centre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - M Kalaivani
- Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - S K Gupta
- Centre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - A K Goswami
- Centre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - B Nongkynrih
- Centre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shields W, McDonald E, Frattaroli S, Bishai D, Ma X, Gielen A. Structural housing elements associated with home injuries in children. Inj Prev 2015; 22:105-9. [DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2015] [Accepted: 07/30/2015] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
7
|
Robnett RH, Bliss S, Buck K, Dempsey J, Gilpatric H, Michaud K. Validation of the Safe at Home Screening with Adults Who Have Acquired Brain Injury. Occup Ther Health Care 2015; 30:16-28. [PMID: 26053430 DOI: 10.3109/07380577.2015.1044691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
The Safe at Home Screening (SAH) is an occupational therapy assessment tool designed to quickly assess home safety awareness and skills through the use of mock hazardous situations in a kitchen setting. The SAH has been standardized on community-dwelling adults. This research project involves psychometric analyses using the SAH on a sample of adults with acquired brain injuries (ABI; N = 31), and compares their SAH outcome scores with those of the Kohlman Evaluation of Living Skills (KELS). The scores on the two tests were found to be moderately correlated. An aspect of content validity was explored by asking the clients' occupational therapists to make predictions about their clients' functioning in the realm of home safety. Correlations between the expert opinions of potential client scores and actual SAH test scores were moderate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Regula H Robnett
- a Occupational Therapy , University of New England , Portland , ME , USA
| | - Stephanie Bliss
- a Occupational Therapy , University of New England , Portland , ME , USA
| | - Kari Buck
- a Occupational Therapy , University of New England , Portland , ME , USA
| | - Jennifer Dempsey
- a Occupational Therapy , University of New England , Portland , ME , USA
| | - Heidi Gilpatric
- a Occupational Therapy , University of New England , Portland , ME , USA
| | - Katherine Michaud
- a Occupational Therapy , University of New England , Portland , ME , USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Khan UR, Chandran A, Zia N, Huang CM, De Ramirez SS, Feroze A, Hyder AA, Razzak JA. Home injury risks to young children in Karachi, Pakistan: a pilot study. Arch Dis Child 2013; 98:881-6. [PMID: 23995075 PMCID: PMC4316730 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-303907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To pilot an in-home unintentional injury hazard assessment tool and to quantify potential injury risks for young children in a low-income urban setting. METHODS Two low-income neighbourhoods in Karachi, Pakistan, were mapped, and families with at least one child between the ages of 12 and 59 months were identified. Using existing available home injury risk information, an in-home injury risk assessment tool was drafted and tailored to the local setting. Home injury assessments were done in June-July 2010 after obtaining informed consent. RESULTS Approximately 75.4% of mothers were educated through at least grade 12. The main risks identified were stoves within the reach of the child (n=279, 55.5%), presence of open buckets in the bathroom (n=240, 47.7%) within the reach of the child, and pedestal fans accessible to the child (n=242, 48.1%). In terms of safety equipment, a first-aid box with any basic item was present in 70% of households, but only 4.8% of households had a fire extinguisher in the kitchen. CONCLUSIONS This was the first time that an in-home, all-unintentional injury risk assessment tool was tailored and applied in the context of a low-income community in Pakistan. There was a significant burden of hazards present in the homes in these communities, representing an important opportunity for injury prevention. This pilot may have future relevance to other LMICs where child injury prevention is a critical need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uzma Rahim Khan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Aruna Chandran
- International Injury Research Unit (IIRU), Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Nukhba Zia
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan,International Injury Research Unit (IIRU), Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Cheng-Ming Huang
- International Injury Research Unit (IIRU), Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sarah Stewart De Ramirez
- International Injury Research Unit (IIRU), Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Asher Feroze
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Adnan Ali Hyder
- International Injury Research Unit (IIRU), Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Junaid Abdul Razzak
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan,Aman Healthcare Services, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
|
10
|
Saramago P, Sutton AJ, Cooper NJ, Manca A. Mixed treatment comparisons using aggregate and individual participant level data. Stat Med 2012; 31:3516-36. [PMID: 22764016 DOI: 10.1002/sim.5442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2011] [Accepted: 04/23/2012] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Mixed treatment comparisons (MTC) extend the traditional pair-wise meta-analytic framework to synthesize information on more than two interventions. Although most MTCs use aggregate data (AD), a proportion of the evidence base might be available at the individual level (IPD). We develop a series of novel Bayesian statistical MTC models to allow for the simultaneous synthesis of IPD and AD, potentially incorporating study and individual level covariates. The effectiveness of different interventions to increase the provision of functioning smoke alarms in households with children was used as a motivating dataset. This included 20 studies (11 AD and 9 IPD), including 11 500 participants. Incorporating the IPD into the network allowed the inclusion of information on subject level covariates, which produced markedly more accurate treatment-covariate interaction estimates than an analysis solely on the AD from all studies. Including evidence at the IPD level in the MTC is desirable when exploring participant level covariates; even when IPD is available only for a fraction of the studies. Such modelling may not only reduce inconsistencies within networks of trials but also assist the estimation of intervention subgroup effects to guide more individualised treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Saramago
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sucharew H, Khoury JC, Xu Y, Succop P, Yolton K. NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale profiles predict developmental outcomes in a low-risk sample. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2012; 26:344-52. [PMID: 22686386 PMCID: PMC3376022 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01288.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Latent profile analysis (LPA) has been used previously to classify neurobehavioral responses of infants prenatally exposed to cocaine and other drugs of abuse. The objective of this study was to define NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS) profile response patterns in a cohort of infants with no known cocaine exposure or other risks for neurobehavior deficits, and determine whether these profiles predict neurobehavioral outcomes in these low-risk infants. METHODS NNNS exams were performed on 355 low-risk infants at approximately 5 weeks after birth. LPA was used to define discrete profiles based on the standard NNNS summary scales. Associations between the infant profiles and neurobehavioral outcomes at one to three years of age were examined. RESULTS Twelve of the 13 summary scales were used and three discrete NNNS profiles identified: social/easy going infants (44%), hypotonic infants (24%), and high arousal/difficult infants (32%). Statistically significant associations between NNNS profiles and later neurobehavioral outcomes were found for psychomotor development and externalizing behaviors. Hypotonic infants had both lower psychomotor development and lower externalizing scores compared to the other two profiles. CONCLUSIONS Three distinct profiles of the NNNS summary scores were identifiable using LPA among infants with no known cocaine exposure. These profile patterns were associated with early childhood neurobehavioral outcome, similar to findings reported in a study of infants with substantial cocaine exposure, demonstrating the utility of this profiling technique in both exposed and unexposed populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi Sucharew
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
| | - Jane C. Khoury
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
| | - Yingying Xu
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, Division of General and Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
| | - Paul Succop
- University of Cincinnati, Department of Environmental Health, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
| | - Kimberly Yolton
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, Division of General and Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Spanier AJ, Kahn RS, Kunselman AR, Hornung R, Xu Y, Calafat AM, Lanphear BP. Prenatal exposure to bisphenol A and child wheeze from birth to 3 years of age. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES 2012; 120:916-20. [PMID: 22334053 PMCID: PMC3385426 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1104175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2011] [Accepted: 02/14/2012] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bisphenol A (BPA), an endocrine-disrupting chemical that is routinely detected in > 90% of Americans, promotes experimental asthma in mice. The association of prenatal BPA exposure and wheeze has not been evaluated in humans. OBJECTIVE We examined the relationship between prenatal BPA exposure and wheeze in early childhood. METHODS We measured BPA concentrations in serial maternal urine samples from a prospective birth cohort of 398 mother-infant pairs and assessed parent-reported child wheeze every 6 months for 3 years. We used generalized estimating equations with a logit link to evaluate the association of prenatal urinary BPA concentration with the dichotomous outcome wheeze (wheeze over the previous 6 months). RESULTS Data were available for 365 children; BPA was detected in 99% of maternal urine samples during pregnancy. In multivariable analysis, a one-unit increase in log-transformed creatinine-standardized mean prenatal urinary BPA concentration was not significantly associated with child wheeze from birth to 3 years of age, but there was an interaction of BPA concentration with time (p = 0.003). Mean prenatal BPA above versus below the median was positively associated with wheeze at 6 months of age [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.3; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3, 4.1] but not at 3 years (AOR = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.3, 1.1). In secondary analyses evaluating associations of each prenatal BPA concentration separately, urinary BPA concentrations measured at 16 weeks gestation were associated with wheeze (AOR = 1.2; 95% CI: 1.0, 1.5), but BPA concentrations at 26 weeks of gestation or at birth were not. CONCLUSIONS Mean prenatal BPA was associated with increased odds of wheeze in early life, and the effect diminished over time. Evaluating exposure at each prenatal time point demonstrated an association between wheeze from 6 months to 3 years and log-transformed BPA concentration at 16 weeks gestation only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam J Spanier
- Department of Pediatrics, Penn State University Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033-0850, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cooper NJ, Kendrick D, Achana F, Dhiman P, He Z, Wynn P, Le Cozannet E, Saramago P, Sutton AJ. Network meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to increase the uptake of smoke alarms. Epidemiol Rev 2011; 34:32-45. [PMID: 22128085 DOI: 10.1093/epirev/mxr015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
This study is the first known to use network meta-analysis to simultaneously evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to increase the prevalence of functioning smoke alarms in households with children. The authors identified 24 primary studies from a systematic review of reviews and of more recently published primary studies, of which 23 (17 randomized controlled trials and 6 nonrandomized comparative studies) were included in 1 of the following 2 network meta-analyses: 1) possession of a functioning alarm: interventions that were more "intensive" (i.e., included components providing equipment (with or without fitting), home inspection, or both, in addition to education) generally were more effective. The intervention containing all of the aforementioned components was identified as being the most likely to be the most effective (probability (best) = 0.66), with an odds ratio versus usual care of 7.15 (95% credible interval: 2.40, 22.73); 2) type of battery-powered alarms: ionization alarms with lithium batteries were most likely to be the best type for increasing functioning possession (probability (best) = 0.69). Smoke alarm promotion programs should ensure they provide the combination of interventions most likely to be effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola J Cooper
- Centre for Biostatistics and Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 22-28 Princess Road West, Leicester LE1 6TP, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Phelan KJ, Khoury J, Xu Y, Liddy S, Hornung R, Lanphear BP. A randomized controlled trial of home injury hazard reduction: the HOME injury study. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011; 165:339-45. [PMID: 21464382 DOI: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To test the efficacy of installing safety devices in the homes of young children on total injury rates and on injuries deemed a priori modifiable by the installation of these devices. DESIGN A nested, prospective, randomized controlled trial. SETTING Indoor environment of housing units. PARTICIPANTS Mothers and their children from birth to 3 years old participating in the Home Observation and Measures of the Environment study. Among 8878 prenatal patients, 1263 (14.2%) were eligible, 413 (32.7%) agreed to participate, and 355 were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 181) or control (n = 174) groups. INTERVENTION Installation of multiple passive measures (eg, stair gates, cabinet locks, and smoke detectors) to reduce exposure to injury hazards. Injury hazards were assessed at home visits by teams of trained research assistants using a validated survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Modifiable and medically attended injury (ie, telephone calls, office visits, and emergency visits for injury). RESULTS The mean age of children at intervention was 6.3 months. Injury hazards were reduced in the intervention homes but not in the control homes at 1 and 2 years (P < .004). There was no difference in the rate for all medically attended injuries in intervention children compared with controls: 14.3 injuries (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.7-21.1 injuries) vs 20.8 injuries (95% CI, 14.4-29.9 injuries) per 100 child-years (P = .17); but there was a significant reduction in the rate of modifiable medically attended injuries in intervention children compared with controls: 2.3 injuries (95% CI, 1.0-5.5 injuries) vs 7.7 injuries (95% CI, 4.2-14.2 injuries) per 100 child-years (P = .03). CONCLUSION An intervention to reduce exposure to hazards in homes led to a 70% reduction in the rate of modifiable medically attended injury. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00129324.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kieran J Phelan
- Center for Children's Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Xu Y, Yolton K, Khoury J. Earliest appropriate time for administering neurobehavioral assessment in newborn infants. Pediatrics 2011; 127:e69-75. [PMID: 21172999 PMCID: PMC3375468 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-1121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of examination time on newborn neurobehavioral examinations administered within 48 hours of delivery and to identify the earliest appropriate time for performing the assessment. METHODS We analyzed data from neurobehavioral examinations on 324 newborns using the NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS). Trends over examination time and cumulative percentage within published normal ranges were analyzed to identify the earliest appropriate time for administering the examination. Ordinal logistic regression and multivariate regression were used for testing and defining the earliest appropriate time for administering the examination without being influenced by acute effects of labor and delivery while controlling for several potential confounding factors. RESULTS The arousal, excitability, lethargy, quality-of-movement, hypotonicity, and nonoptimal-reflexes scales were sensitive to timing of the examination. Results of ordinal logistic regression showed that 20 hours after delivery seemed to be the earliest appropriate time for administering newborn NNNS examinations. The proportion of NNNS scores within the normal range increased with time significantly when the examination was made less than 20 hours after delivery (n = 148) (odds ratio: 1.12 [95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.23]), but there was no longer significant association with time of examination after 20 hours (n = 176) (odds ratio: 1.04 [95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.09]). This result was confirmed by multivariate regression. CONCLUSIONS We recommend 20 hours after delivery as the earliest appropriate time for administering newborn NNNS examinations to obtain results reflecting outcomes that are a representative assessment of newborn neurobehavior and not contaminated by acute effects of labor and delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingying Xu
- Divisions of General and Community Pediatrics and
| | | | - Jane Khoury
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|