A proposal for cellularity assessment for EGFR mutational analysis with a correlation with DNA yield and evaluation of the number of sections obtained from cell blocks for immunohistochemistry in non-small cell lung carcinoma

Molecular biomarker testing for non-small cell lung cancer: consensus statement of the Korean Cardiopulmonary Pathology Study Group

Molecular biomarker testing is the standard of care for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. In 2017, the Korean Cardiopulmonary Pathology Study Group and the Korean Molecular Pathology Study Group co-published a molecular testing guideline which contained almost all known genetic changes that aid in treatment decisions or predict prognosis in patients with NSCLC. Since then there have been significant changes in targeted therapies as well as molecular testing including newly approved targeted drugs and liquid biopsy. In order to reflect these changes, the Korean Cardiopulmonary Pathology Study Group developed a consensus statement on molecular biomarker testing. This consensus statement was crafted to provide guidance on what genes should be tested, as well as methodology, samples, patient selection, reporting and quality control.

Time-saving method for directly amplifying and capturing a minimal amount of pancreatic tumor-derived mutations from fine-needle aspirates using digital PCR

It is challenging to secure a cytopathologic diagnosis using minute amounts of tumor fluids and tissue fragments. Hence, we developed a rapid, accurate, low-cost method for detecting tumor cell-derived DNA from limited amounts of specimens and samples with a low tumor cellularity, to detect KRAS mutations in pancreatic ductal carcinomas (PDA) using digital PCR (dPCR). The core invention is based on the suspension of tumor samples in pure water, which causes an osmotic burst; the crude suspension could be directly subjected to emulsion PCR in the platform. We examined the feasibility of this process using needle aspirates from surgically resected pancreatic tumor specimens (n = 12). We successfully amplified and detected mutant KRAS in 11 of 12 tumor samples harboring the mutation; the positive mutation frequency was as low as 0.8%. We used residual specimens from fine-needle aspiration/biopsy and needle flush processes (n = 10) for method validation. In 9 of 10 oncogenic KRAS pancreatic tumor samples, the "water-burst" method resulted in a positive mutation call. We describe a dPCR-based, super-sensitive screening protocol for determining KRAS mutation availability using tiny needle aspirates from PDAs processed using simple steps. This method might enable pathologists to secure a more accurate, minimally invasive diagnosis using minute tissue fragments.

Adequacy of Cytologic Samples by Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Transthoracic Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology of Peripheral Pulmonary Nodules for Morphologic Diagnosis and Molecular Evaluations: Comparison With Computed Tomography–Guided Percutaneous Transthoracic Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology

Context.—

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of pulmonary nodules is usually guided by computed tomography (CT), whereas ultrasonography (US) is generally considered not applicable for such purposes.

Objective.—

To evaluate the clinical applicability and diagnostic utility of US-guided transthoracic FNAC of peripheral pulmonary nodules.

Design.—

Ultrasonography-guided transthoracic FNAC was obtained from 40 selected patients with peripheral, subpleural, and paravertebral pulmonary nodules. Air-dried and Diff-Quik–stained smears were used for rapid on-site evaluation; additional smears were alcohol fixed for Papanicolaou staining. Cell blocks were set up for immunocytochemical and molecular studies; in 2 cases, a flow cytometry evaluation was also performed. The series was compared to 40 CT-guided pulmonary FNAC samples from patients with pleural, peripheral, and paravertebral pulmonary nodules, to evaluate differences in terms of diagnostic rate, time of execution, safety, and cost.

Results.—

The US-guided FNAC samples had results that were adequate and representative in 95% of cases. No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of diagnostic rate, number of passes, and cellularity of both smears and cell blocks. The mean time needed for the execution of US-guided FNAC was 13.1 minutes, whereas the mean time for CT-guided FNAC was 23.6 minutes. Thus, US-guided FNAC was significantly more rapid than CT-guided pulmonary FNAC. Because pneumothorax occurred in 1 individual who underwent US-guided FNAC and in 9 who underwent CT-guided FNAC, we might conclude that US-guided FNAC is a significantly safer procedure. Finally, comparing the costs of both procedures, US-guided FNAC is less expensive.

Conclusions.—

Our experience showed an elevated clinical applicability and diagnostic utility of US-guided transthoracic FNAC for selected pulmonary nodules.

Cytological preparations for molecular analysis: A review of technical procedures, advantages and limitations for referring samples for testing

Minimally invasive procedures such as endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) must yield not only good quality and quantity of material for morphological assessment, but also an adequate sample for analysis of molecular markers to guide patients to appropriate targeted therapies. In this context, cytopathologists worldwide should be familiar with minimum requirements for refereeing cytological samples for testing. The present manuscript is a review with comprehensive description of the content of the workshop entitled Cytological preparations for molecular analysis: pre-analytical issues for EBUS TBNA, presented at the 40th European Congress of Cytopathology in Liverpool, UK. The present review emphasises the advantages and limitations of different types of cytology substrates used for molecular analysis such as archival smears, liquid-based preparations, archival cytospin preparations and FTA (Flinders Technology Associates) cards, as well as their technical requirements/features. These various types of cytological specimens can be successfully used for an extensive array of molecular studies, but the quality and quantity of extracted nucleic acids rely directly on adequate pre-analytical assessment of those samples. In this setting, cytopathologists must not only be familiar with the different types of specimens and associated technical procedures, but also correctly handle the material provided by minimally invasive procedures, ensuring that there is sufficient amount of material for a precise diagnosis and correct management of the patient through personalised care.

Subjecting appropriate lung adenocarcinoma samples to next-generation sequencing-based molecular testing: challenges and possible solutions

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has recently been rapidly adopted in the molecular diagnosis of cancer, but it still faces some obstacles. In this study, 665 lung adenocarcinoma samples (558 TKI-naive and 107 TKI-relapsed samples) were interrogated using NGS, and the challenges and possible solutions of subjecting appropriate tissue samples to NGS testing were explored. The results showed that lower frequencies of HER2/BRAF/PIK3CA and acquired EGFR T790M mutations were observed in biopsy samples with <20% tumor cellularity than in those with ≥20%, but there were no significant differences in the frequencies of EGFR or KRAS mutations. Moreover, tumor heterogeneity was assessed by heterogeneity score (HS), which was calculated through multiplying by 2 the mutant allele frequency (MAF) of tumor cells. In TKI-naive samples, intratumor heterogeneity could occur in EGFR, KRAS, HER2, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutant tumors, but the degree was variable. Higher EGFR, but lower BRAF and PIK3CA HS values were observed compared with KRAS HS. In TKI-relapsed samples, analysis of concomitant sensitizing EGFR and T790M MAFs showed that intratumor heterogeneity was common in acquired EGFR T790M mutant tumors. The mutational status between primary and metastatic tumors was usually concordant, but KRAS, HER2, and PIK3CA HS were significantly higher in metastatic tumors than in primary tumors. Additionally, the discordance rate of mutational status in multifocal lung adenocarcinomas diagnosed as equivocal or multiple primary tumors was high. Together, our findings demonstrate that a comprehensive quality assessment is necessary during tissue process to mitigate the challenges of poor tumor cellularity, tumor heterogeneity, and multifocal clonally independent tumors.

EGFR, KRAS, BRAF and HER2 testing in metastatic lung adenocarcinoma: Value of testing on samples with poor specimen adequacy and analysis of discrepancies

Molecular testing on metastatic lung adenocarcinoma or on non-small cell non-squamous lung carcinoma often relies on small specimen. In this group of patient with poor specimen adequacy, we analyzed the rate of EGFR, KRAS, BRAF and HER2 mutations compared to their rate in optimal specimen. We analyzed discrepancies in molecular testing results in patients with iterative analysis on several samples. We performed a retrospective study of 1538 samples consecutively analyzed. 263/665 (39,5%) biopsies and 37/708 (5,2%) surgical specimens were considered as samples with poor specimen adequacy (p<0,0001). A lower tumor cell content was associated with a lower rate of KRAS mutation: 15,8% in samples with <10% of tumor cells or <100 tumor cells versus 29,8% in samples with >10% tumor cell and >100 tumor cells (p=0,001). KRAS mutational rate was at 11,1% in cytology specimens, significantly lower than in biopsy or surgical specimens respectively at 28,2% and 28,5% (p=0,0002). Tumor cell content was not associated with mutational rate for EGFR, BRAF and HER2 mutations. DNA quantity was not associated with mutational rate for EGFR, KRAS, BRAF and HER2. A discrepancy in molecular testing was found in 16 patients. For 5 patients there was also a discrepancy for TTF-1 expression. On the 11 without TTF-1 discrepancy, specimen adequacy was not fulfilled in 10 cases at least for tumor content. Discrepancies were found in the case of low cellularity, poor cell content or testing on cytological specimens. Tumor cell content is a crucial parameter for molecular analysis rather than the type of specimen or the DNA quantity. Discrepancies in molecular testing results are rare but might suggest the presence of another tumor type, the emergence of another clone or a molecular testing in a sample with low cell content.

Preanalytic specimen triage: Smears, cell blocks, cytospin preparations, transport media, and cytobanking

With increasing requests for the evaluation of prognostic and predictive molecular biomarkers, great attention must be paid to the preanalytical issues regarding sample quality and DNA/RNA yield from all different types of cytological preparations. The objectives of this review were: 1) to provide an update regarding the importance of specimen triage as well as specimen handling and collection; 2) to discuss the different cell preparations that can be used for molecular testing, their advantages and limitations; and 3) to highlight the strategies for biobanking cytology samples. Good-quality DNA/RNA can be harvested from fresh cells in cell suspensions, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded cell blocks, archival stained smears, archival unstained cytospin preparations, liquid-based cytology slides, FTA cards, and cryopreserved cells. In contrast to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue specimens (small biopsies and surgical resections), the multitude of types of sample preparations as well as the diversity in sample collection and processing procedures make cytology an ideal specimen for most genomic platforms, with less DNA and RNA degradation and a purer sample, usually with a higher concentration of tumor cells. The broad incorporation of cytological specimens into clinical practice. A should increase the number of samples potentially available for molecular tests and avoid repeat invasive procedures for tissue procurement, thereby increasing patient safety. In this context, it is of utmost importance that cytopathologists become familiar with the variables that can affect test results and embrace the goal of excellence in sample quality. Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125(6 suppl):455-64. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: diagnostic difficulties in small biopsies and cytological specimens

The pathological and molecular classification of lung cancer has become substantially more complex over the past decade. For diagnostic purposes on small samples, additional stains are frequently required to distinguish between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Subsequently, for advanced nonsquamous cell nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients, predictive analyses on epidermal growth factor receptor, anaplastic lymphoma kinase and ROS1 are required. In NSCLCs negative for these biomarkers, programmed death ligand-1 immunohistochemistry is performed. Small samples (biopsy and cytology) require “tissue” management, which is best achieved by the interaction of all physicians involved.

Diagnosis of anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement in cytological samples through a fluorescence in situ hybridization-based assay: Cytological smears versus cell blocks

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) status analysis of lung cytological specimens should be successfully encouraged in routine practice because biopsy specimens are not always available. To date, the US Food and Drug Administration has approved both fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) as diagnostic tests for identifying ALK-positive patients eligible for treatment with crizotinib. Although ALK IHC is an optimal diagnostic tool, FISH becomes mandatory in equivocal cases. ALK FISH of paraffin-embedded tissue material is still the gold standard, whereas the cytological specimen assay has not yet been completely standardized. Many controversial data have been reported on the adequacy of cytology cell blocks (CBs) versus conventional smears for FISH testing. This review discusses some critical issues related to ALK FISH of cytological samples, including the triaging of collected specimens to optimize the material, the use of CBs versus conventional smears, and alternative methods for an ALK rearrangement diagnosis. Conventional smears have the advantages of an immediate evaluation, no probe tissue-related artifactual loss, no fixation-related alterations, and usually sufficient material for an analytic preparation. On the other hand, CBs have several advantages, including the appropriate conservation of the tissue architecture, an absence of problems related to cell overlapping, and the ability to evaluate neoplastic cells in a dark field. Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125:303-312. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Intratumor Heterogeneity of Perfusion and Diffusion in Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Correlation With Tumor Cellularity

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the potential to noninvasively provide information about the tumor microenvironment. A correlation between arterial spin-labeled (ASL) MRI and tumor vasculature has been previously demonstrated; however, its correlation with tumor cellularity is unknown. We sought to assess intratumor heterogeneity of perfusion and diffusion in vivo in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) using MRI and to correlate these findings with tumor vascularity and cellularity at histopathology.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-three ccRCC patients underwent ASL and diffusion-weighted MRI before surgery after signing an informed consent in this prospective institutional review board-approved, HIPAA (Insurance Portability and Accountability Act)-compliant study. Quantitative ASL perfusion and diffusion were measured in 2 areas within the same tumor with high and low perfusion. Microvessel density (MVD) on CD31 and CD34 immunostains and tumor cellularity in anatomically coregistered tissue samples were correlated to MRI measurements (Spearman; P < .05 statistically significant).

RESULTS

ASL perfusion (P < .0001), CD31 MVD (P = .02), CD34 MVD (P = .04), and cellularity (P = .002) from high and low perfusion areas were significantly different across all tumors. There were positive correlations between tumor cellularity and CD31 MVD (ρ = 0.350, P = .021), CD31 and CD34 MVD (ρ = 0.838, P < .0001), ASL perfusion and cellularity (ρ = 0.406, P = .011), and ASL perfusion and CD31 MVD (ρ = 0.468, P = .003), and a negative correlation between tissue diffusion coefficient and cellularity (ρ = -0.316, P = .039).

CONCLUSION

Tumor areas with high ASL perfusion exhibit higher cellularity and MVD compared to areas with low perfusion in the same tumor. A positive correlation between tumor vascularity and cellularity in ccRCC is newly reported. A negative correlation between tumor diffusion and cellularity is confirmed.