1
|
Farshid G, Armes J, Dessauvagie B, Gilhotra A, Kumar B, Mahajan H, Millar E, Pathmanathan N, Snell C. Development and Validation of a HER2-Low Focused Immunohistochemical Scoring System With High-Interobserver Concordance: The Australian HER2-Low Breast Cancer Concordance Study. Mod Pathol 2024; 37:100535. [PMID: 38852812 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
The DESTINY Breast-04 trial revealed survival advantages of trastuzumab deruxtecan for women with metastatic HER2-low breast cancer (1+ or 2+ immunohistochemistry [IHC], without amplification). Although this trial applied the 2018 Americal Society of Clinial Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) HER2 IHC scoring criteria, the subjectivity and imprecision in IHC scoring have raised concerns that patients' treatment may be misaligned. Our group of 9 experienced breast pathologists collated a deidentified set of 60 breast cancer core biopsies from 3 laboratories, evaluated with the Ventana 4B5 HER2 assay and mostly scored locally as HER2 0 or 1+. Based on ASCO/CAP 2018 criteria and our extensive experience of reporting HER2 IHC, we specified scoring conventions for cancers with low levels of HER2 protein expression, articulating specific scoring pitfalls. Each pathologist then reviewed digitized whole slide images of the IHC slides and scored the HER2 expression for each case. At a subsequent consensus workshop, we reviewed the cases jointly to establish consensus scores for each case and determine the percentage of HER2 expressing tumor cells. Consensus was reached on all cases, with 40 classified as 1+ and 3 as 2+ (not amplified), totaling 43 (71.7%) HER2-low cancers. The remaining cases were HER2 0. In 93.3% of cases (56/60), the consensus score matched with the majority opinion of pathologists' independent scores. Seven (41.2%) of the 17 cases reported locally as HER2 0 were classified as HER2 low. Conversely, among 32 cases with local scores of 1+, 7 (21.8%) were reclassified as ultralow or null. Individual pathologists' accuracy in matching the consensus scores ranged from 73.3% to 91.67% (mean, 80.74%). Among HER2-low cancers those in which <20% of the tumor cells expressed HER2 had the lowest concordance levels. Observers Cohen's κ coefficients for concordance were excellent for 4, good in 1, and moderate in the 4 observers. This reference set of cases with expert consensus HER2 scores will be invaluable for peer training and development of our national external quality assurance program for HER2-low cancers. For assessing breast cancers at the low end of HER2 protein expression, our targeted scoring criteria and explicit instruction on pitfalls improved pathologists' accuracy and concordance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gelareh Farshid
- Discipline of Medicine, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Discipline of Anatomical Pathology, SA Pathology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| | - Jane Armes
- Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia
| | - Benjamin Dessauvagie
- Clinipath Pathology, Sonic Healthcare Australia Pathology, Osborne Park, Western Australia; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Amardeep Gilhotra
- Discipline of Anatomical Pathology, SA Pathology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Beena Kumar
- Anatomical Pathology and Diagnostic Genomics, Monash Health Pathology, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hema Mahajan
- NSW Health Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia; School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ewan Millar
- NSW Health Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; St George Hospital, Kogarah & School of Clinical Medicine, St George and Sutherland Campus, UNSW Medicine & Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nirmala Pathmanathan
- Westmead Breast Cancer Institute, Westmead Hospital, Sydney Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology, Macquarie Park, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Cameron Snell
- Anatomical Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ferenczi Á, Cserni G. Changes in breast cancer grade from biopsy to excision following surgery or primary chemotherapy. Pathologica 2024; 116:22-31. [PMID: 38482672 PMCID: PMC10938276 DOI: 10.32074/1591-951x-958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To compare histological grade (G) of breast cancer and its components (scores for tubule formation - T, nuclear pleomorphism - P and mitotic counts - M) in core needle biopsies (CNBs) and surgical excision specimens (EXC) in patients treated with primary surgery (CHIR) or primary chemotherapy (PST). Methods Grade of matched pairs of carcinomas in CNB and EXC was assessed according to the Nottingham grading system. Results PST cases tended to have higher pretreatment G. Concordance rates in the CHIR (n = 760) and PST (n = 148) groups for T, P, M and G were 79%, 70%, 75%, 71% and 77%, 70%, 50%, 62%, respectively; differences in concordance rates were significant in M (p < 0.0001) and G (p = 0.024). For discordant cases in the CHIR group, CNBs tended to overestimate T and underestimate P, M and G, whereas in the PST group, the same trends were identified for T and P, but there was a significant tendency for M and G to be lower in EXC specimens. Conclusions The reversal of M and G underestimation in CNB to "overestimation" in the PST group can only be explained with the effect of mitosis reduction following chemotherapy. Whether the posttreatment decrease in G reflects any prognostic value remains to be elucidated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ádám Ferenczi
- Department of Pathology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Gábor Cserni
- Department of Pathology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- Department of Pathology, Bács-Kiskun County Teaching Hospital, Kecskemét, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xue X, Guo L, Guo C, Li L, Yang L, Wang X, Rao W, Yuan P, Mu J, Li J, Wang B, Zhou Q, Yang W, Liu Y, Xue W, Jia R, Yang W, Ying J. Proficiency testing of diagnosis in histopathology and immunohistochemistry of breast pathology in China: results from a pilot work of National Single Disease Quality Control Program for breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:23. [PMID: 38166768 PMCID: PMC10763217 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11777-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
AIM Pathologists are currently supposed to be aware of both domestic and international guidelines for breast cancer diagnosis, but it is unclear how successfully these guidelines have been integrated into routine clinical practice in China. Thus, this national proficiency testing (PT) scheme for breast pathology was set up to conduct a baseline assessment of the diagnostic capability of pathologists in China. METHODS This national PT plan is designed and implemented according to the "Conformity assessment-General requirements for proficiency testing" (GB/T27043-2012/ISO/IEC 17043:2010). Five cases of breast cancer with six key items, including histologic type, grade, ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67, were selected for testing among 96 participants. The final PT results were published on the website of the National Quality Control Center for Cancer ( http://117.133.40.88:3927/cn/col22/362 ). RESULTS Our study demonstrated that the median PT score was 89.5 (54-100). Two institutions with scores < 67 were deemed unacceptable. The accuracy of histologic type, ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 was satisfactory (all > 86%). However, the histologic grade showed low accuracy (74.0%). The unacceptable results mainly included incorrect evaluation of histologic grade (36.7%), inaccurate evaluation of ER/PR/HER2/Ki67 (28.2%), incorrect identification of C-AD as IBC-NST (15.7%), inappropriate use of 1+/2+/3+ rather than staining percentage for ER/PR (6.1%), misclassification of ER/PR < 1% weak expression as positive staining (1.4%), and no evaluation of histologic grade in ILC, MC, and IMC (5.8%). CONCLUSIONS our nationwide PT program exhibited a satisfactory baseline assessment of the diagnostic capability of pathologists in China. More importantly, we identify some areas for further improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuemin Xue
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Lei Guo
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Changyuan Guo
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Lin Li
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Lin Yang
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wei Rao
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Pei Yuan
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jiali Mu
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jiangtao Li
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Bingning Wang
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Quan Zhou
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wentao Yang
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yueping Liu
- Department of Pathology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Weicheng Xue
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Rujing Jia
- Special Standard Laboratory Accreditation Department, National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment, 8 Nanhuashi Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100062, China.
| | - Wenjing Yang
- Office for Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Quality Control, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Jianming Ying
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rakha EA, Adebayo LA, Abbas A, Hodi Z, Lee AHS, Ellis IO. Second opinion (external specialist referral) practice of breast pathology: the Nottingham experience. Histopathology 2023; 83:394-405. [PMID: 37356966 DOI: 10.1111/his.14993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Breast pathology is a challenging field, and discrepancies in diagnoses exist and can affect patient management. This study aims to review a breast referral practice and assess the pattern and frequency of breast lesions sent for an external expert review and evaluate potential impacts on patients' care. METHODS AND RESULTS Seven hundred and forty cases that were referred to Nottingham City Hospital for a second opinion between 2019 and 2022 which have slides and reports were retrieved and reviewed. Reasons for referral, initial diagnosis, proffered specialist opinion and any discrepancy or potential impacts of management were assessed. The most frequent entities were papillary lesions (19%), fibroepithelial lesions (17%), invasive carcinomas that were sent for confirmation of the invasive diagnosis or subtyping of the invasive tumour (17%), intraductal epithelial proliferation with atypia (9%) and spindle cell lesions (8%). Other entities included biphasic tumours such as adenomyoepithelioma, as well as vascular and nipple lesions. Few cases were sent for prognostic classification or comments on the management, and in occasional cases no initial diagnosis was offered. After reviewing the cases by the expert pathologists, the initial diagnosis was confirmed or one of the suggested diagnoses was preferred in 79% of cases, including 129 cases (17%) in which the opinion resulted minor changes in the management. Significant changes in the classification of lesions were made in 132 cases (18%) which resulted in significant change in the patient management recommendation. In 14 cases (2%) a final classification was not possible, and further specialist opinion was obtained. Comments on the differential diagnosis and advice on further patient management were provided in most cases. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the value of external referral of challenging, rare and difficult to classify breast lesions. It also highlights the most common breast lesions that are likely to be challenging, and specialist opinion can refine their classification to improve patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emad A Rakha
- Department of Histopathology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
- Academic Unit for Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Pathology Department, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Luqman Adedotun Adebayo
- Department of Histopathology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Areeg Abbas
- Department of Histopathology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Zsolt Hodi
- Department of Histopathology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Andrew H S Lee
- Department of Histopathology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ian O Ellis
- Department of Histopathology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
- Academic Unit for Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ibrahim A, Toss MS, Makhlouf S, Miligy IM, Minhas F, Rakha EA. Improving mitotic cell counting accuracy and efficiency using phosphohistone-H3 (PHH3) antibody counterstained with haematoxylin and eosin as part of breast cancer grading. Histopathology 2023; 82:393-406. [PMID: 36349500 PMCID: PMC10100421 DOI: 10.1111/his.14837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mitotic count in breast cancer is an important prognostic marker. Unfortunately, substantial inter- and intraobserver variation exists when pathologists manually count mitotic figures. To alleviate this problem, we developed a new technique incorporating both haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and phosphorylated histone H3 (PHH3), a marker highly specific to mitotic figures, and compared it to visual scoring of mitotic figures using H&E only. METHODS Two full-face sections from 97 cases were cut, one stained with H&E only, and the other was stained with PHH3 and counterstained with H&E (PHH3-H&E). Counting mitoses using PHH3-H&E was compared to traditional mitoses scoring using H&E in terms of reproducibility, scoring time, and the ability to detect mitosis hotspots. We assessed the agreement between manual and image analysis-assisted scoring of mitotic figures using H&E and PHH3-H&E-stained cells. The diagnostic performance of PHH3 in detecting mitotic figures in terms of sensitivity and specificity was measured. Finally, PHH3 replaced the mitosis score in a multivariate analysis to assess its significance. RESULTS Pathologists detected significantly higher mitotic figures using the PHH3-H&E (median ± SD, 20 ± 33) compared with H&E alone (median ± SD, 16 ± 25), P < 0.001. The concordance between pathologists in identifying mitotic figures was highest when using the dual PHH3-H&E technique; in addition, it highlighted mitotic figures at low power, allowing better agreement on choosing the hotspot area (k = 0.842) in comparison with standard H&E (k = 0.625). A better agreement between image analysis-assisted software and the human eye was observed for PHH3-stained mitotic figures. When the mitosis score was replaced with PHH3 in a Cox regression model with other grade components, PHH3 was an independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio [HR] 5.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.92-16.69; P = 0.002), and even showed a more significant association with breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) than mitosis (HR 3.63, 95% CI 1.49-8.86; P = 0.005) and Ki67 (P = 0.27). CONCLUSION Using PHH3-H&E-stained slides can reliably be used in routine scoring of mitotic figures and integrating both techniques will compensate for each other's limitations and improve diagnostic accuracy, quality, and precision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asmaa Ibrahim
- Academic Unit for Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, University Park, Nottingham, UK.,Histopathology department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
| | - Michael S Toss
- Academic Unit for Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, University Park, Nottingham, UK
| | - Shorouk Makhlouf
- Academic Unit for Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, University Park, Nottingham, UK.,Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Islam M Miligy
- Histopathology department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin El Kom, Egypt.,Histopathology department, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Fayyaz Minhas
- Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Emad A Rakha
- Academic Unit for Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, University Park, Nottingham, UK.,Histopathology department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin El Kom, Egypt.,Histopathology department, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rakha EA, Tse GM, Quinn CM. An update on the pathological classification of breast cancer. Histopathology 2023; 82:5-16. [PMID: 36482272 PMCID: PMC10108289 DOI: 10.1111/his.14786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Revised: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease, encompassing a diverse spectrum of tumours with varying morphological, biological, and clinical phenotypes. Although tumours may show phenotypic overlap, they often display different biological behaviour and response to therapy. Advances in high-throughput molecular techniques and bioinformatics have contributed to improved understanding of BC biology and refinement of molecular taxonomy with the identification of specific molecular subclasses. Although the traditional pathological morphological classification of BC is of paramount importance and provides diagnostic and prognostic information, current interest focusses on the use of a single gene and multigene assays to stratify BC into distinct groups to guide decisions on systemic therapy. This review considers approaches to the classification of BC, including their limitations, and with particular emphasis on the fundamental role of morphology in establishing an accurate diagnosis of primary invasive carcinoma of breast origin. This forms the basis for further morphological characterization and for all other approaches to BC classification that are used to provide prognostic and therapeutic predictive information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emad A Rakha
- Translational Medical Sciences Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Department of Cellular Pathology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham City Hospital Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Gary M Tse
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Ngan Shing Street, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Cecily M Quinn
- Department of Histopathology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Defining the area of mitoses counting in invasive breast cancer using whole slide image. Mod Pathol 2022; 35:739-748. [PMID: 34897279 PMCID: PMC9174050 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00981-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Although counting mitoses is part of breast cancer grading, concordance studies showed low agreement. Refining the criteria for mitotic counting can improve concordance, particularly when using whole slide images (WSIs). This study aims to refine the methodology for optimal mitoses counting on WSI. Digital images of 595 hematoxylin and eosin stained sections were evaluated. Several morphological criteria were investigated and applied to define mitotic hotspots. Reproducibility, representativeness, time, and association with outcome were the criteria used to evaluate the best area size for mitoses counting. Three approaches for scoring mitoses on WSIs (single and multiple annotated rectangles and multiple digital high-power (×40) screen fields (HPSFs)) were evaluated. The relative increase in tumor cell density was the most significant and easiest parameter for identifying hotspots. Counting mitoses in 3 mm2 area was the most representative regarding saturation and concordance levels. Counting in area <2 mm2 resulted in a significant reduction in mitotic count (P = 0.02), whereas counting in area ≥4 mm2 was time-consuming and did not add a significant rise in overall mitotic count (P = 0.08). Using multiple HPSF, following calibration, provided the most reliable, timesaving, and practical method for mitoses counting on WSI. This study provides evidence-based methodology for defining the area and methodology of visual mitoses counting using WSI. Visual mitoses scoring on WSI can be performed reliably by adjusting the number of monitor screens.
Collapse
|
8
|
Cserni B, Bori R, Csörgő E, Oláh-Németh O, Pancsa T, Sejben A, Sejben I, Vörös A, Zombori T, Nyári T, Cserni G. ONEST (Observers Needed to Evaluate Subjective Tests) suggests four or more observers for a reliable assessment of the consistency of histological grading of invasive breast carcinoma: A reproducibility study with a retrospective view on previous studies. Pathol Res Pract 2022; 229:153718. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2021.153718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
9
|
Atypia in breast pathology: what pathologists need to know. Pathology 2021; 54:20-31. [PMID: 34872753 DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2021.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Despite the importance of atypia in diagnosing and classifying breast lesions, the definition of atypia varies depending on the context, with a lack of consistent and objective criteria for assessment. Atypia in breast pathology may be cytonuclear and/or architectural with different applications and implications. Cytonuclear atypia is used to assist the distinction of various intraductal epithelial proliferative lesions including usual ductal hyperplasia (UDH) versus atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and to grade DCIS. In invasive carcinoma, nuclear atypia (i.e., nuclear pleomorphism) is a component of the histological grading system. Stromal cell cytonuclear atypia is one of the key features used to distinguish fibroadenoma from phyllodes tumour (PT) and to classify PT as benign, borderline or malignant. Similarly, cytonuclear atypia is used in the evaluation of myoepithelial cell alterations in the breast. Architectural atypia is used to differentiate flat epithelial atypia (FEA) from ADH or DCIS. In addition to the inherent subjectivity in the interpretation of atypia, which presents as a morphological continuum reflecting a biological spectrum, the lack of standardisation in defining atypia augments diagnostic discordance in breast pathology, with potential implications for patient management. Evidence to date suggests that the traditional criteria used to assess atypia may require modification in the era of digital pathology primary diagnosis. This review aims to provide a comprehensive review of atypia in breast pathology with reference to inconsistencies, challenges and limitations.
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang H, Donnan P, Macaskill EJ, Jordan L, Thompson A, Evans A. A pre-operative prognostic model predicting all cause and cause specific mortality for women presenting with invasive breast cancer. Breast 2021; 61:11-21. [PMID: 34891035 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study is to develop a pre-operative prognostic model based on known pre-operative factors. METHODS A database of ultrasound (US) lesions undergoing biopsy documented US lesion size, stiffness, and patient source prospectively. Women with invasive cancer presenting between 2010 and 2015 were the study group. Breast and axillary core results and ER, PR and HER receptor status were collected prospectively. Assessment of US skin thickening, US distal enhancement and presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) was performed retrospectively. Patient survival and cause of death were ascertained from computer records. Predictive models for (i) all-cause mortality (ACM) and (ii) breast cancer death (BCD) were built and then validated using bootstrap k-fold cross-validation. A comparison of predictive performance was made between a full cause-specific Cox model, a sub cause-specific Cox model, and a full Fine-Gray sub-distribution hazard model. RESULTS 1136 patients were included in the study. The median follow-up time was 6.2 years. 125 (11%) women died from breast cancer and 155 (14%) died from other causes. For the prediction of BCD, the cause-specific Cox sub-model performed the best. The time dependent AUC begins above 0.91 in year one to 3 reducing to 0.83 in year 6. The factors included in the Cox sub model were tumour size, skin thickening, source of detection, tumour grade, ER status, pre-operative nodal metastasis and CKD. CONCLUSION We have shown that a model based on preoperative factors can predict BCD. Such prediction if externally validated and incorporating treatment data could be useful for treatment planning and patient counselling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huan Wang
- Population Health and Genomics, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK
| | - Peter Donnan
- Medical School Division of Population Health Sciences Within the Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK
| | | | - Lee Jordan
- Histopathology Breast Unit, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK
| | - Alastair Thompson
- Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, United States; Population Health and Genomics, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK
| | - Andy Evans
- Mail Box 4, Ninewells Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Katayama A, Toss MS, Parkin M, Sano T, Oyama T, Quinn CM, Ellis IO, Rakha EA. Nuclear morphology in breast lesions: refining its assessment to improve diagnostic concordance. Histopathology 2021; 80:515-528. [PMID: 34605058 DOI: 10.1111/his.14577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although evaluation of nuclear morphology plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and categorisation of breast lesions, the criteria used to assess nuclear atypia rely on the subjective evaluation of several features that may result in inter- and intra-observer variation. This study aims to refine the definitions of cytonuclear features in various breast lesions. METHODS ImageJ was used to assess the nuclear morphological features including nuclear diameter, axis length, perimeter, area, circularity, and roundness in 160 breast lesions comprising ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), invasive breast carcinoma of no special type (IBC-NST), tubular carcinoma, usual ductal hyperplasia (UDH), columnar cell change (CCC) and flat epithelial atypia (FEA). Reference cells included normal epithelial cells, red blood cells (RBCs) and lymphocytes. RESULTS Reference cells showed size differences not only between normal epithelial cells and RBCs but also between RBCs in varied-sized blood vessels. Nottingham grade nuclear pleomorphism scores 1 and 3 cut-offs in IBC, compared to normal epithelial cells, were <1.2x and >1.4x that of mean maximum Feret's diameter and <1.6x and >2.4x that of mean nuclear area, respectively. Nuclear morphometrics were significantly different in low-grade IBC-NST vs. tubular carcinoma, low-grade DCIS vs. UDH, and in CCC vs. FEA. No differences in the nuclear features between grade matched DCIS and IBC were identified. CONCLUSION This study provides a guide for the assessment of nuclear atypia in breast lesions, refines the comparison with reference cells and highlights the potential diagnostic value of image analysis tools in the era of digital pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayaka Katayama
- Translational Medical Sciences Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, City Hospital, Nottingham, UK.,Diagnostic Pathology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Michael S Toss
- Translational Medical Sciences Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Matthew Parkin
- Translational Medical Sciences Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Takaaki Sano
- Diagnostic Pathology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Tetsunari Oyama
- Diagnostic Pathology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Cecily M Quinn
- Department of Histopathology, St Vincent's University Hospital, University College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ian O Ellis
- Translational Medical Sciences Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, City Hospital, Nottingham, UK.,Department of Histopathology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Emad A Rakha
- Translational Medical Sciences Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, City Hospital, Nottingham, UK.,Department of Histopathology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ibrahim A, Lashen A, Toss M, Mihai R, Rakha E. Assessment of mitotic activity in breast cancer: revisited in the digital pathology era. J Clin Pathol 2021; 75:365-372. [PMID: 34556501 DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2021-207742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
The assessment of cell proliferation is a key morphological feature for diagnosing various pathological lesions and predicting their clinical behaviour. Visual assessment of mitotic figures in routine histological sections remains the gold-standard method to evaluate the proliferative activity and grading of cancer. Despite the apparent simplicity of such a well-established method, visual assessment of mitotic figures in breast cancer (BC) remains a challenging task with low concordance among pathologists which can lead to under or overestimation of tumour grade and hence affects management. Guideline recommendations for counting mitoses in BC have been published to standardise methodology and improve concordance; however, the results remain less satisfactory. Alternative approaches such as the use of the proliferation marker Ki67 have been recommended but these did not show better performance in terms of concordance or prognostic stratification. The advent of whole slide image technology has brought the issue of mitotic counting in BC into the light again with more challenges to develop objective criteria for identifying and scoring mitotic figures in digitalised images. Using reliable and reproducible morphological criteria can provide the highest degree of concordance among pathologists and could even benefit the further application of artificial intelligence (AI) in breast pathology, and this relies mainly on the explicit description of these figures. In this review, we highlight the morphology of mitotic figures and their mimickers, address the current caveats in counting mitoses in breast pathology and describe how to strictly apply the morphological criteria for accurate and reliable histological grade and AI models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asmaa Ibrahim
- Division of Cancer and Stem Cell, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Department of Pathology, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
| | - Ayat Lashen
- Division of Cancer and Stem Cell, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Department of Pathology, Menoufia University, Shebin El-Kom, Egypt
| | - Michael Toss
- Division of Cancer and Stem Cell, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Raluca Mihai
- Department of Pathology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Emad Rakha
- Division of Cancer and Stem Cell, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK .,Department of Pathology, Menoufia University, Shebin El-Kom, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kilmartin D, O’Loughlin M, Andreu X, Bagó-Horváth Z, Bianchi S, Chmielik E, Cserni G, Figueiredo P, Floris G, Foschini MP, Kovács A, Heikkilä P, Kulka J, Laenkholm AV, Liepniece-Karele I, Marchiò C, Provenzano E, Regitnig P, Reiner A, Ryška A, Sapino A, Specht Stovgaard E, Quinn C, Zolota V, Webber M, Roshan D, Glynn SA, Callagy G. Intra-Tumour Heterogeneity Is One of the Main Sources of Inter-Observer Variation in Scoring Stromal Tumour Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13174410. [PMID: 34503219 PMCID: PMC8431498 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13174410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Stromal tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are a strong prognostic marker in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Consistency scoring sTILs is good and was excellent when an internet-based scoring aid developed by the TIL-WG was used to score cases in a reproducibility study. This study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of sTILs assessment using this scoring aid in cases from routine practice and to explore the potential of the tool to overcome variability in scoring. Twenty-three breast pathologists scored sTILs in digitized slides of 49 TNBC biopsies using the scoring aid. Subsequently, fields of view (FOV) from each case were selected by one pathologist and scored by the group using the tool. Inter-observer agreement was good for absolute sTILs (ICC 0.634, 95% CI 0.539-0.735, p < 0.001) but was poor to fair using binary cutpoints. sTILs heterogeneity was the main contributor to disagreement. When pathologists scored the same FOV from each case, inter-observer agreement was excellent for absolute sTILs (ICC 0.798, 95% CI 0.727-0.864, p < 0.001) and good for the 20% (ICC 0.657, 95% CI 0.561-0.756, p < 0.001) and 40% (ICC 0.644, 95% CI 0.546-0.745, p < 0.001) cutpoints. However, there was a wide range of scores for many cases. Reproducibility scoring sTILs is good when the scoring aid is used. Heterogeneity is the main contributor to variance and will need to be overcome for analytic validity to be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren Kilmartin
- Discipline of Pathology, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland; (D.K.); (M.O.); (M.W.); (S.A.G.)
| | - Mark O’Loughlin
- Discipline of Pathology, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland; (D.K.); (M.O.); (M.W.); (S.A.G.)
| | - Xavier Andreu
- UDIAT-Centre Diagnòstic, Pathology Department, Institut Universitari Parc Taulí-UAB, Parc Taulí, 1, 08205 Sabadell, Spain;
| | - Zsuzsanna Bagó-Horváth
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Simonetta Bianchi
- Division of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy;
| | - Ewa Chmielik
- Tumor Pathology Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland;
| | - Gábor Cserni
- Department of Pathology, Bács-Kiskun County Teaching Hospital, 6000 Kecskemét, Hungary;
| | - Paulo Figueiredo
- Laboratório de Anatomia Patológica, Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal;
| | - Giuseppe Floris
- Laboratory of Translational Cell and Tissue Research, Department of Imaging and Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;
| | - Maria Pia Foschini
- Unit of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bellaria Hospital, 40139 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Anikó Kovács
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden;
| | - Päivi Heikkilä
- Department of Pathology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, 00029 Helsinki, Finland;
| | - Janina Kulka
- 2nd Department of Pathology, Semmelweis University Budapest, Üllői út 93, 1091 Budapest, Hungary;
| | - Anne-Vibeke Laenkholm
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark;
| | | | - Caterina Marchiò
- Unit of Pathology, Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (C.M.); (A.S.)
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Elena Provenzano
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK;
- National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Peter Regitnig
- Diagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria;
| | - Angelika Reiner
- Department of Pathology, Klinikum Donaustadt, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Aleš Ryška
- The Fingerland Department of Pathology, Charles University Medical Faculty and University Hospital, 50003 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic;
| | - Anna Sapino
- Unit of Pathology, Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (C.M.); (A.S.)
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | | | - Cecily Quinn
- Irish National Breast Screening Programme, BreastCheck, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland;
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Vasiliki Zolota
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Rion, Greece;
| | - Mark Webber
- Discipline of Pathology, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland; (D.K.); (M.O.); (M.W.); (S.A.G.)
| | - Davood Roshan
- School of Mathematics, Statistics and Applied Mathematics, National University of Ireland Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland;
| | - Sharon A. Glynn
- Discipline of Pathology, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland; (D.K.); (M.O.); (M.W.); (S.A.G.)
| | - Grace Callagy
- Discipline of Pathology, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland; (D.K.); (M.O.); (M.W.); (S.A.G.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Low-risk DCIS. What is it? Observe or excise? Virchows Arch 2021; 480:21-32. [PMID: 34448893 PMCID: PMC8983540 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-021-03173-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The issue of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of lesions detected by breast screening mammography has been debated in both international media and the scientific literature. A proportion of cancers detected by breast screening would never have presented symptomatically or caused harm during the patient's lifetime. The most likely (but not the only) entity which may represent those overdiagnosed and overtreated is low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). In this article, we address what is understood regarding the natural history of DCIS and the diagnosis and prognosis of low-grade DCIS. However, low cytonuclear grade disease may not be the totality of DCIS that can be considered of low clinical risk and we outline the issues regarding active surveillance vs excision of low-risk DCIS and the clinical trials exploring this approach.
Collapse
|
15
|
Lee SE, Kim HY, Yoon JH, Kim EK, Kim JY, Kim MJ, Kim GR, Park YV, Moon HJ. Chronological Trends of Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Clinical, Radiologic, and Pathologic Perspectives. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:8699-8709. [PMID: 34196861 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10378-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because no prior studies have evaluated the chronological trends of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) despite the increasing number of surgeries performed for DCIS, this study analyzed how the clinical, radiologic, and pathologic characteristics of DCIS changed during a 10-year period. METHODS Of 7123 patients who underwent primary breast cancer surgery at a single institution from 2006 to 2015, 792 patients with pure DCIS were included in this study. The chronological trends of age, symptoms, method for detecting either mammography or ultrasonography, tumor size, nuclear grade, comedonecrosis, and molecular markers were calculated using Poisson regression for all patients and asymptomatic patients. RESULTS During 10 years, DCIS surgery rates significantly increased (p < 0.001). Despite the high percentage of DCIS detected on mammography, the detection rate for DCIS by mammography significantly decreased (97.3% in 2006 to 67.6% in 2015; p = 0.025), whereas the detection rate by ultrasound significantly increased (2.7% to 31.0%; p < 0.001). Conservation surgery rates (odds ratio [OR], 1.058), low-to-intermediate nuclear grade rates (OR, 1.069), and the absence of comedonecrosis (OR, 1.104) significantly increased over time (all p < 0.05). Estrogen receptor (ER) negativity (OR, 0.935) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positivity rates (OR, 0.953) significantly decreased (all p < 0.05). The same trends were observed for the 613 asymptomatic patients. CONCLUSION The rate of DCIS detected on ultrasound only significantly increased during 10 years. Low-to-intermediate nuclear grade rates significantly increased, whereas ER negativity and HER2 positivity rates significantly decreased during the same period. These findings suggest that DCIS detected on screening ultrasound is less aggressive than DCIS detected on mammography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Si Eun Lee
- Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea
| | - Ha Yan Kim
- Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Hyun Yoon
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun-Kyung Kim
- Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea
| | - Jee Ye Kim
- Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min Jung Kim
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ga Ram Kim
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Youngjean Vivian Park
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee Jung Moon
- Department of Radiology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Elsharawy KA, Gerds TA, Rakha EA, Dalton LW. Artificial intelligence grading of breast cancer: a promising method to refine prognostic classification for management precision. Histopathology 2021; 79:187-199. [PMID: 33590486 DOI: 10.1111/his.14354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM Artificial intelligence (AI)-based breast cancer grading may help to overcome perceived limitations of human assessment. Here, the potential value of AI grade was evaluated at the molecular level and in predicting patient outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS A supervised convolutional neural network (CNN) model was trained on images of 612 breast cancers from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The test set, obtained from the Cooperative Human Tissue Network (CHTN), comprised 1058 cancers with corresponding survival data. Upon reversal, a CNN was trained from images of 1537 CHTN cancers and tested on 397 TCGA cancers. In TCGA, mRNA models were trained using AI grade and Nottingham grade (NG) as labels. Performance of mRNA models in predicting patient outcome was evaluated using data from 1807 cancers from the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) cohort. In selecting images for training, nucleolar prominence determined high- versus low-grade cancer cells. In CHTN, NG corresponded to significant survival stratification in stages 1, 2 and 3 cancers, while AI grade showed significance in stages 1 and 2 and borderline in stage 3 tumours. In METABRIC, the mRNA model trained from AI grade was not significantly different to the NG-based model. The gene which best described AI grade was TRIP13, a gene involved with mitotic spindle assembly. CONCLUSION An AI grade trained from the morphologically distinctive feature of nucleolar prominence could transmit significant patient outcome information across three independent patient cohorts. AI grade shows promise in gene discovery and for second opinions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khloud A Elsharawy
- Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Biodiscovery Institute, Nottingham, UK.,Faculty of Science, Damietta University, Damietta, Egypt
| | - Thomas A Gerds
- Department Biostatistics, University CopenhagenA, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Emad A Rakha
- Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Biodiscovery Institute, Nottingham, UK
| | - Leslie W Dalton
- Department of Histopathology, South Austin Hospital, Emeritus, Austin, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
van Seijen M, Jóźwiak K, Pinder SE, Hall A, Krishnamurthy S, Thomas JSJ, Collins LC, Bijron J, Bart J, Cohen D, Ng W, Bouybayoune I, Stobart H, Hudecek J, Schaapveld M, Thompson A, Lips EH, Wesseling J. Variability in grading of ductal carcinoma in situ among an international group of pathologists. J Pathol Clin Res 2021; 7:233-242. [PMID: 33620141 PMCID: PMC8073001 DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
The prognostic value of cytonuclear grade in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is debated, partly due to high interobserver variability and the use of multiple guidelines. The aim of this study was to evaluate interobserver agreement in grading DCIS between Dutch, British, and American pathologists. Haematoxylin and eosin-stained slides of 425 women with primary DCIS were independently reviewed by nine breast pathologists based in the Netherlands, the UK, and the USA. Chance-corrected kappa (κma ) for association between pathologists was calculated based on a generalised linear mixed model using the ordinal package in R. Overall κma for grade of DCIS (low, intermediate, or high) was estimated to be 0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.56), indicating a moderate association between pathologists. When the model was adjusted for national guidelines, the association for grade did not change (κma = 0.53; 95% CI 0.48-0.57); subgroup analysis for pathologists using the UK pathology guidelines only had significantly higher association (κma = 0.58; 95% CI 0.56-0.61). To assess if concordance of grading relates to the expression of the oestrogen receptor (ER) and HER2, archived immunohistochemistry was analysed on a subgroup (n = 106). This showed that non-high grade according to the majority opinion was associated with ER positivity and HER2 negativity (100 and 89% of non-high grade cases, respectively). In conclusion, DCIS grade showed only moderate association using whole slide images scored by nine breast pathologists. As therapeutic decisions and inclusion in ongoing clinical trials are guided by DCIS grade, there is a pressing need to reduce interobserver variability in grading. ER and HER2 might be supportive to prevent the accidental and unwanted inclusion of high-grade DCIS in such trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maartje van Seijen
- Division of Molecular PathologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Katarzyna Jóźwiak
- Division of Molecular PathologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry ResearchBrandenburg Medical School Theodor FontaneNeuruppinGermany
| | - Sarah E Pinder
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre at Guy's Hospital, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical SciencesKings College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Cellular PathologyGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust LondonLondonUK
| | - Allison Hall
- Department of PathologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | - Savitri Krishnamurthy
- Department of PathologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTXUSA
| | | | - Laura C Collins
- Department of PathologyBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | - Jonathan Bijron
- Department of PathologyMartini HospitalGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Joost Bart
- Department of PathologyIsala HospitalZwolleThe Netherlands
- Department of PathologyUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Danielle Cohen
- Department of PathologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Wen Ng
- Department of Cellular PathologyGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust LondonLondonUK
| | - Ihssane Bouybayoune
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre at Guy's Hospital, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical SciencesKings College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Jan Hudecek
- Department of Research ITThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Department of Psychosocial Research and EpidemiologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Alastair Thompson
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer CenterBaylor College of MedicineHoustonTXUSA
| | - Esther H Lips
- Division of Molecular PathologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Division of Molecular PathologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of PathologyIsala HospitalZwolleThe Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
LaBoy C, Siziopikou KP, Rosen L, Blanco LZ, Pincus JL. Clinicopathologic features of unexpectedly HER2 positive breast carcinomas: An institutional experience. Pathol Res Pract 2021; 222:153441. [PMID: 33857853 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2021.153441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression occurs in 15-20 % of all breast carcinomas. These tumors are usually high-grade which often correlates with reduced overall survival and increased rates of recurrence. In a retrospective review, we identified 19 cases of unexpectedly HER2 positive (by immunohistochemistry and/or fluorescence in-situ hybridization) invasive breast carcinomas on core needle biopsies from a registry at Northwestern Memorial Hospital. These cases included low-grade tumors, invasive lobular carcinomas, classic type, and invasive carcinomas with special subtype features. Twelve of the tumors were histologic grade 1 and 7 were histologic grade 2. One of the grade 1 tumors had tubular features (8 %), 1 had cribriform features (8 %), 2 had mucinous features (17 %), 2 were invasive lobular carcinomas, classic type (17 %), and the rest were invasive carcinoma, no special type (50 %). The histologic grade 2 tumors included 5 invasive lobular carcinomas, classic type (71 %) and 2 invasive ductal carcinomas with mucinous features (29 %). By immunohistochemistry, 13 (65 %) were HER2 score 3+, 7 were score 2+ (35 %), and reflex fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) testing showed amplification in 6 cases, with 1 equivocal case amplified on excision. Despite the HER2 positive status in the selected cases, no unique morphologic features that would indicate aggressive behavior were identified. In clinical follow up, two patients were found to have recurrences, five had lymph node metastasis, and one had distant metastasis. None of the patients with recurrent disease were treated with trastuzumab, despite their positive HER2 results. These findings support that our population of HER2 positive carcinomas showed a similar rate of lymph node metastases and recurrence as poorly-differentiated tumors, supporting HER2 positivity as a poor prognostic indicator, irrespective of morphologic features. We recommend continuing to test all breast cancers, regardless of grade or special subtype features, to provide the most comprehensive treatment and prognostic information for both clinicians and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carissa LaBoy
- Department of Pathology, Breast Pathology Section, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 251 East Huron St., Chicago, IL, 60611, United States.
| | - Kalliopi P Siziopikou
- Department of Pathology, Breast Pathology Section, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 251 East Huron St., Chicago, IL, 60611, United States
| | - Lauren Rosen
- Department of Pathology, Breast Pathology Section, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 251 East Huron St., Chicago, IL, 60611, United States
| | - Luis Z Blanco
- Department of Pathology, Breast Pathology Section, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 251 East Huron St., Chicago, IL, 60611, United States
| | - Jennifer L Pincus
- Department of Pathology, Breast Pathology Section, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 251 East Huron St., Chicago, IL, 60611, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Shaaban AM, Hilton B, Clements K, Provenzano E, Cheung S, Wallis MG, Sawyer E, Thomas JS, Hanby AM, Pinder SE, Thompson AM. Pathological features of 11,337 patients with primary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and subsequent events: results from the UK Sloane Project. Br J Cancer 2020; 124:1009-1017. [PMID: 33199800 PMCID: PMC7921398 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-01152-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2020] [Revised: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The Sloane audit compares screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) pathology with subsequent management and outcomes. Methods This was a national, prospective cohort study of DCIS diagnosed during 2003–2012. Results Among 11,337 patients, 7204 (64%) had high-grade DCIS. Over time, the proportion of high-grade disease increased (from 60 to 65%), low-grade DCIS decreased (from 10 to 6%) and mean size increased (from 21.4 to 24.1 mm). Mastectomy was more common for high-grade (36%) than for low-grade DCIS (15%). Few (6%) patients treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) had a surgical margin <1 mm. Of the 9191 women diagnosed in England (median follow-up 9.4 years), 7% developed DCIS or invasive malignancy in the ipsilateral and 5% in the contralateral breast. The commonest ipsilateral event was invasive carcinoma (n = 413), median time 62 months, followed by DCIS (n = 225), at median 37 months. Radiotherapy (RT) was most protective against recurrence for high-grade DCIS (3.2% for high-grade DCIS with RT compared to 6.9% without, compared with 2.3 and 3.0%, respectively, for low/intermediate-grade DCIS). Ipsilateral DCIS events lessened after 5 years, while the risk of ipsilateral invasive cancer remained consistent to beyond 10 years. Conclusion DCIS pathology informs patient management and highlights the need for prolonged follow-up of screen-detected DCIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abeer M Shaaban
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Bridget Hilton
- Screening Quality Assurance Service, Public Health England, Birmingham, UK
| | - Karen Clements
- Screening Quality Assurance Service, Public Health England, Birmingham, UK
| | - Elena Provenzano
- Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK.,Cambridge Breast Unit, and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Shan Cheung
- Screening Quality Assurance Service, Public Health England, Birmingham, UK
| | - Matthew G Wallis
- Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK.,Cambridge Breast Unit, and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Elinor Sawyer
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Andrew M Hanby
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Sarah E Pinder
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Van Bockstal MR, Berlière M, Duhoux FP, Galant C. Interobserver Variability in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast. Am J Clin Pathol 2020; 154:596-609. [PMID: 32566938 DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Since most patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast are treated upon diagnosis, evidence on its natural progression to invasive carcinoma is limited. It is estimated that around half of the screen-detected DCIS lesions would have remained indolent if they had never been detected. Many patients with DCIS are therefore probably overtreated. Four ongoing randomized noninferiority trials explore active surveillance as a treatment option. Eligibility for these trials is mainly based on histopathologic features. Hence, the call for reproducible histopathologic assessment has never sounded louder. METHODS Here, the available classification systems for DCIS are discussed in depth. RESULTS This comprehensive review illustrates that histopathologic evaluation of DCIS is characterized by significant interobserver variability. Future digitalization of pathology, combined with development of deep learning algorithms or so-called artificial intelligence, may be an innovative solution to tackle this problem. However, implementation of digital pathology is not within reach for each laboratory worldwide. An alternative classification system could reduce the disagreement among histopathologists who use "conventional" light microscopy: the introduction of dichotomous histopathologic assessment is likely to increase interobserver concordance. CONCLUSIONS Reproducible histopathologic assessment is a prerequisite for robust risk stratification and adequate clinical decision-making. Two-tier histopathologic assessment might enhance the quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mieke R Van Bockstal
- Department of Pathology, Brussels, Belgium
- Breast Clinic, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Medical Oncology, King Albert II Cancer Institute, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Martine Berlière
- Department of Medical Oncology, King Albert II Cancer Institute, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
- Laboratory of Experimental Cancer Research, Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Francois P Duhoux
- Department of Medical Oncology, King Albert II Cancer Institute, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
- Laboratory of Experimental Cancer Research, Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christine Galant
- Department of Pathology, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Medical Oncology, King Albert II Cancer Institute, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rakha EA, Alsaleem M, ElSharawy KA, Toss MS, Raafat S, Mihai R, Minhas FA, Green AR, Rajpoot NM, Dalton LW, Mongan NP. Visual histological assessment of morphological features reflects the underlying molecular profile in invasive breast cancer: a morphomolecular study. Histopathology 2020; 77:631-645. [PMID: 32618014 DOI: 10.1111/his.14199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Revised: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Tumour genotype and phenotype are related and can predict outcome. In this study, we hypothesised that the visual assessment of breast cancer (BC) morphological features can provide valuable insight into underlying molecular profiles. METHODS AND RESULTS The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) BC cohort was used (n = 743) and morphological features, including Nottingham grade and its components and nucleolar prominence, were assessed utilising whole-slide images (WSIs). Two independent scores were assigned, and discordant cases were utilised to represent cases with intermediate morphological features. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified for each feature, compared among concordant/discordant cases and tested for specific pathways. Concordant grading was observed in 467 of 743 (63%) of cases. Among concordant case groups, eight common DEGs (UGT8, DDC, RGR, RLBP1, SPRR1B, CXorf49B, PSAPL1 and SPRR2G) were associated with overall tumour grade and its components. These genes are related mainly to cellular proliferation, differentiation and metabolism. The number of DEGs in cases with discordant grading was larger than those identified in concordant cases. The largest number of DEGs was observed in discordant grade 1:3 cases (n = 1185). DEGs were identified for each discordant component. Some DEGs were uniquely associated with well-defined specific morphological features, whereas expression/co-expression of other genes was identified across multiple features and underlined intermediate morphological features. CONCLUSION Morphological features are probably related to distinct underlying molecular profiles that drive both morphology and behaviour. This study provides further evidence to support the use of image-based analysis of WSIs, including artificial intelligence algorithms, to predict tumour molecular profiles and outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emad A Rakha
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Mansour Alsaleem
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Khloud A ElSharawy
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Michael S Toss
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sara Raafat
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Raluca Mihai
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Fayyaz A Minhas
- Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Andrew R Green
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Nasir M Rajpoot
- Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Leslie W Dalton
- Department of Histopathology, South Austin Hospital, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Nigel P Mongan
- Department of Pharmacology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rakha EA, Toss M, Shiino S, Gamble P, Jaroensri R, Mermel CH, Chen PHC. Current and future applications of artificial intelligence in pathology: a clinical perspective. J Clin Pathol 2020; 74:409-414. [PMID: 32763920 DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
During the last decade, a dramatic rise in the development and application of artificial intelligence (AI) tools for use in pathology services has occurred. This trend is often expected to continue and reshape the field of pathology in the coming years. The deployment of computational pathology and applications of AI tools can be considered as a paradigm shift that will change pathology services, making them more efficient and capable of meeting the needs of this era of precision medicine. Despite the success of AI models, the translational process from discovery to clinical applications has been slow. The gap between self-contained research and clinical environment may be too wide and has been largely neglected. In this review, we cover the current and prospective applications of AI in pathology. We examine its applications in diagnosis and prognosis, and we offer insights for considerations that could improve clinical applicability of these tools. Then, we discuss its potential to improve workflow efficiency, and its benefits in pathologist education. Finally, we review the factors that could influence adoption in clinical practices and the associated regulatory processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emad A Rakha
- Histopathology, University of Nottingham School of Medicine, Nottingham, UK
| | - Michael Toss
- Histopathology, University of Nottingham School of Medicine, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sho Shiino
- Histopathology, University of Nottingham School of Medicine, Nottingham, UK
| | - Paul Gamble
- Google Health, Google, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Elsharawy KA, Toss MS, Raafat S, Ball G, Green AR, Aleskandarany MA, Dalton LW, Rakha EA. Prognostic significance of nucleolar assessment in invasive breast cancer. Histopathology 2020; 76:671-684. [PMID: 31736094 DOI: 10.1111/his.14036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Revised: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Nucleolar morphometric features have a potential role in the assessment of the aggressiveness of many cancers. However, the role of nucleoli in invasive breast cancer (BC) is still unclear. The aims of this study were to investigate the optimal method for scoring nucleoli in IBC and their prognostic significance, and to refine the grading of breast cancer (BC) by incorporating nucleolar score. METHODS AND RESULTS Digital images acquired from haematoxylin and eosin-stained sections from a large BC cohort were divided into training (n = 400) and validation (n = 1200) sets for use in this study. Four different assessment methods were evaluated in the training set to identify the optimal method associated with the best performance and significant prognostic value. These were: (i) a modified Helpap method; (ii) counting prominent nucleoli (size ≥2.5 µm) in 10 field views (FVs); (iii) counting prominent nucleoli in five FVs; and (iv) counting prominent nucleoli in one FV. The optimal method was applied to the validation set and to an external validation set, i.e. data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (n = 743). Scoring prominent nucleoli in five FVs showed the highest interobserver concordance rate (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.8) and a significant association with BC-specific survival (P < 0.0001). A high nucleolar score was associated with younger age, larger tumour size, and higher grade. Incorporation of nucleolar score in the Nottingham grading system resulted in a higher significant association with survival than the conventional grade. CONCLUSIONS Quantification of nucleolar prominence in five FVs is a cost-efficient and reproducible morphological feature that can predict BC behaviour and can provide an alternative to pleomorphism to improve BC grading performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khloud A Elsharawy
- Academic Pathology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Damietta University, Damietta, Egypt
| | - Michael S Toss
- Academic Pathology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sara Raafat
- Academic Pathology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Graham Ball
- School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK
| | - Andrew R Green
- Academic Pathology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Mohammed A Aleskandarany
- Academic Pathology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Leslie W Dalton
- Department of Histopathology, South Austin Hospital, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Emad A Rakha
- Academic Pathology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Interobserver variability in upfront dichotomous histopathological assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: the DCISion study. Mod Pathol 2020; 33:354-366. [PMID: 31534203 PMCID: PMC7983551 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-019-0367-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2019] [Revised: 09/01/2019] [Accepted: 09/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Histopathological assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ, a nonobligate precursor of invasive breast cancer, is characterized by considerable interobserver variability. Previously, post hoc dichotomization of multicategorical variables was used to determine the "ideal" cutoffs for dichotomous assessment. The present international multicenter study evaluated interobserver variability among 39 pathologists who performed upfront dichotomous evaluation of 149 consecutive ductal carcinomas in situ. All pathologists independently assessed nuclear atypia, necrosis, solid ductal carcinoma in situ architecture, calcifications, stromal architecture, and lobular cancerization in one digital slide per lesion. Stromal inflammation was assessed semiquantitatively. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were quantified as percentages and dichotomously assessed with a cutoff at 50%. Krippendorff's alpha (KA), Cohen's kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient were calculated for the appropriate variables. Lobular cancerization (KA = 0.396), nuclear atypia (KA = 0.422), and stromal architecture (KA = 0.450) showed the highest interobserver variability. Stromal inflammation (KA = 0.564), dichotomously assessed tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (KA = 0.520), and comedonecrosis (KA = 0.539) showed slightly lower interobserver disagreement. Solid ductal carcinoma in situ architecture (KA = 0.602) and calcifications (KA = 0.676) presented with the lowest interobserver variability. Semiquantitative assessment of stromal inflammation resulted in a slightly higher interobserver concordance than upfront dichotomous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes assessment (KA = 0.564 versus KA = 0.520). High stromal inflammation corresponded best with dichotomously assessed tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes when the cutoff was set at 10% (kappa = 0.881). Nevertheless, a post hoc tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes cutoff set at 20% resulted in the highest interobserver agreement (KA = 0.669). Despite upfront dichotomous evaluation, the interobserver variability remains considerable and is at most acceptable, although it varies among the different histopathological features. Future studies should investigate its impact on ductal carcinoma in situ prognostication. Forthcoming machine learning algorithms may be useful to tackle this substantial diagnostic challenge.
Collapse
|
25
|
Ibrahim A, Gamble P, Jaroensri R, Abdelsamea MM, Mermel CH, Chen PHC, Rakha EA. Artificial intelligence in digital breast pathology: Techniques and applications. Breast 2019; 49:267-273. [PMID: 31935669 PMCID: PMC7375550 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer and second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The mainstay of breast cancer workup is histopathological diagnosis - which guides therapy and prognosis. However, emerging knowledge about the complex nature of cancer and the availability of tailored therapies have exposed opportunities for improvements in diagnostic precision. In parallel, advances in artificial intelligence (AI) along with the growing digitization of pathology slides for the primary diagnosis are a promising approach to meet the demand for more accurate detection, classification and prediction of behaviour of breast tumours. In this article, we cover the current and prospective uses of AI in digital pathology for breast cancer, review the basics of digital pathology and AI, and outline outstanding challenges in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asmaa Ibrahim
- Department of Histopathology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK
| | | | | | - Mohammed M Abdelsamea
- School of Computing and Digital Technology, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Emad A Rakha
- Department of Histopathology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Deep learning assisted mitotic counting for breast cancer. J Transl Med 2019; 99:1596-1606. [PMID: 31222166 DOI: 10.1038/s41374-019-0275-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2019] [Revised: 04/06/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
As part of routine histological grading, for every invasive breast cancer the mitotic count is assessed by counting mitoses in the (visually selected) region with the highest proliferative activity. Because this procedure is prone to subjectivity, the present study compares visual mitotic counting with deep learning based automated mitotic counting and fully automated hotspot selection. Two cohorts were used in this study. Cohort A comprised 90 prospectively included tumors which were selected based on the mitotic frequency scores given during routine glass slide diagnostics. This pathologist additionally assessed the mitotic count in these tumors in whole slide images (WSI) within a preselected hotspot. A second observer performed the same procedures on this cohort. The preselected hotspot was generated by a convolutional neural network (CNN) trained to detect all mitotic figures in digitized hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) sections. The second cohort comprised a multicenter, retrospective TNBC cohort (n = 298), of which the mitotic count was assessed by three independent observers on glass slides. The same CNN was applied on this cohort and the absolute number of mitotic figures in the hotspot was compared to the averaged mitotic count of the observers. Baseline interobserver agreement for glass slide assessment in cohort A was good (kappa 0.689; 95% CI 0.580-0.799). Using the CNN generated hotspot in WSI, the agreement score increased to 0.814 (95% CI 0.719-0.909). Automated counting by the CNN in comparison with observers counting in the predefined hotspot region yielded an average kappa of 0.724. We conclude that manual mitotic counting is not affected by assessment modality (glass slides, WSI) and that counting mitotic figures in WSI is feasible. Using a predefined hotspot area considerably improves reproducibility. Also, fully automated assessment of mitotic score appears to be feasible without introducing additional bias or variability.
Collapse
|
27
|
Thompson AM, Clements K, Cheung S, Pinder SE, Lawrence G, Sawyer E, Kearins O, Ball GR, Tomlinson I, Hanby A, Thomas JSJ, Maxwell AJ, Wallis MG, Dodwell DJ. Management and 5-year outcomes in 9938 women with screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ: the UK Sloane Project. Eur J Cancer 2018; 101:210-219. [PMID: 30092498 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.06.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Revised: 06/13/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains controversial. METHODS A prospective cohort of patients with DCIS diagnosed through the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (1st April 2003 to 31st March 2012) was linked to national databases and case note review to analyse patterns of care, recurrence and mortality. RESULTS Screen-detected DCIS in 9938 women, with mean age of 60 years (range 46-87), was treated by mastectomy (2931) or breast conserving surgery (BCS) (7007; 70%). At 64 months median follow-up, 697 (6.8%) had further DCIS or invasive breast cancer after BCS (7.8%) or mastectomy (4.5%) (p < 0.001). Breast radiotherapy (RT) after BCS (4363/7007; 62.3%) was associated with a 3.1% absolute reduction in ipsilateral recurrent DCIS or invasive breast cancer (no RT: 7.2% versus RT: 4.1% [p < 0.001]) and a 1.9% absolute reduction for ipsilateral invasive breast recurrence (no RT: 3.8% versus RT: 1.9% [p < 0.001]), independent of the excision margin width or size of DCIS. Women without RT after BCS had more ipsilateral breast recurrences (p < 0.001) when the radial excision margin was <2 mm. Adjuvant endocrine therapy (1208/9938; 12%) was associated with a reduction in any ipsilateral recurrence, whether RT was received (hazard ratio [HR] 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.80) or not (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.51-0.91) after BCS. Women who developed invasive breast recurrence had a worse survival than those with recurrent DCIS (p < 0.001). Among 321 (3.2%) who died, only 46 deaths were attributed to invasive breast cancer. CONCLUSION Recurrent DCIS or invasive cancer is uncommon after screen-detected DCIS. Both RT and endocrine therapy were associated with a reduction in further events but not with breast cancer mortality within 5 years of diagnosis. Further research to identify biomarkers of recurrence risk, particularly as invasive disease, is indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karen Clements
- Public Health England, 1st Floor, 5 St Philip's Place, Birmingham, B3 2PW, UK.
| | - Shan Cheung
- Public Health England, 1st Floor, 5 St Philip's Place, Birmingham, B3 2PW, UK.
| | - Sarah E Pinder
- Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, 9th Floor Innovation Hub, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
| | - Gill Lawrence
- Public Health England, 1st Floor, 5 St Philip's Place, Birmingham, B3 2PW, UK.
| | - Elinor Sawyer
- Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, 9th Floor Innovation Hub, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
| | - Olive Kearins
- Public Health England, 1st Floor, 5 St Philip's Place, Birmingham, B3 2PW, UK.
| | - Graham R Ball
- John van Geest Cancer Research Centre, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Lane, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK.
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Oxford Centre for Cancer Gene Research, Molecular Pathology and Diagnostics Theme, Oxford NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK.
| | - Andrew Hanby
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology (LICAP), Section of Pathology and Tumour Biology, Wellcome Trust Brenner Building, Level 4, Room 4.13 St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK.
| | | | - Anthony J Maxwell
- Nightingale Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK; School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
| | - Matthew G Wallis
- Cambridge Breast Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge & NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - David J Dodwell
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rakha EA, Abbas A, Pinto Ahumada P, ElSayed ME, Colman D, Pinder SE, Ellis IO. Diagnostic concordance of reporting lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer. J Clin Pathol 2018; 71:802-805. [PMID: 29599396 DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2017] [Revised: 02/22/2018] [Accepted: 03/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
AIMS This study aims to assess the diagnostic agreement of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in invasive breast cancer (BC). METHODS Data on LVI were collected from the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme pathology external quality assurance scheme database. 101 BCs assessed over a 10-year period (2004-2014) were included. Cases were scored by an average of 600 pathologists. Three H&E stained slides from each case were reviewed by three pathologists and additional variables were evaluated. RESULTS In the whole series, the overall κ value was 0.4 (range 0.26-0.53). On review, LVI was detected in all three slides in 20 cases (20%), in two slides in 12 cases and in one of the three slides in 9 cases and was not seen in 60 cases. For concordance analysis, the first and last groups were used to represent cases with definite (LVI+) and absent LVI (LVI-), respectively. In the LVI+group (n=20), the level of agreement ranged from 0.54 to 0.99 (median 0.86). In the LVI- group (n=60), the level of agreement ranged from 0.52 to 1.00 (median 0.93), with 44% of cases showing interobserver concordance of >95%. There was a correlation between increasing number of involved lymphovascular spaces in the section and higher LVI reporting concordance. Some degree of retraction/fixation artefacts was observed in 35% of cases; this was associated with a lower concordance rate. CONCLUSIONS The concordance of reporting LVI is variable. Cases without LVI and those with multiple involved vessels are likely to have the highest concordance and the highest detection rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emad A Rakha
- Department of Histopathology, School of Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Histopathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shabeen El Kom, Egypt
| | - Areeg Abbas
- Department of Histopathology, School of Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Maysa E ElSayed
- Public Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebeen El Kom, Egypt
| | - Derek Colman
- Department of Histopathology, School of Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sarah E Pinder
- Cancer Studies, Guy's Hospital, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ian O Ellis
- Department of Histopathology, School of Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Rakha EA, Aleskandarani M, Toss MS, Green AR, Ball G, Ellis IO, Dalton LW. Breast cancer histologic grading using digital microscopy: concordance and outcome association. J Clin Pathol 2018. [DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
AimsVirtual microscopy utilising digital whole slide imaging (WSI) is increasingly used in breast pathology. Histologic grade is one of the strongest prognostic factors in breast cancer (BC). This study aims at investigating the agreement between BC grading using traditional light microscopy (LM) and digital WSI with consideration of reproducibility and impact on outcome prediction.MethodsA large (n=1675) well-characterised cohort of BC originally graded by LM was re-graded using WSI. Two separate virtual-based grading sessions (V1 and V2) were performed with a 3-month washout period. Outcome was assessed using BC-specific and distant metastasis-free survival.ResultsThe concordance between LM grading and WSI was strong (LM/WSI Cramer’s V: V1=0.576, and V2=0.579). The agreement regarding grade components was as follows: tubule formation=0.538, pleomorphism=0.422 and mitosis=0.514. Greatest discordance was observed between adjacent grades, whereas high/low grade discordance was uncommon (1.5%). The intraobserver agreement for the two WSI sessions was substantial for grade (V1/V2 Cramer’s V=0.676; kappa=0.648) and grade components (Cramer’s V T=0.628, p=0.573 and M=0.580). Grading using both platforms showed strong association with outcome (all p values <0.001). Although mitotic scores assessed using both platforms were strongly associated with outcome, WSI tends to underestimate mitotic counts.ConclusionsVirtual microscopy is a reliable and reproducible method for assessing BC histologic grade. Regardless of the observer or assessment platform, histologic grade is a significant predictor of outcome. Continuing advances in imaging technology could potentially provide improved performance of WSI BC grading and in particular mitotic count assessment.
Collapse
|
30
|
Weigel S, Khil L, Hense HW, Decker T, Wellmann J, Heidrich J, Sommer A, Heidinger O, Heindel W. Detection Rates of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ with Biennial Digital Mammography Screening: Radiologic Findings Support Pathologic Model of Tumor Progression. Radiology 2018; 286:424-432. [DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017170673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
31
|
Qaiser T, Mukherjee A, Reddy PB C, Munugoti SD, Tallam V, Pitkäaho T, Lehtimäki T, Naughton T, Berseth M, Pedraza A, Mukundan R, Smith M, Bhalerao A, Rodner E, Simon M, Denzler J, Huang CH, Bueno G, Snead D, Ellis IO, Ilyas M, Rajpoot N. HER2 challenge contest: a detailed assessment of automated HER2 scoring algorithms in whole slide images of breast cancer tissues. Histopathology 2017; 72:227-238. [DOI: 10.1111/his.13333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2017] [Accepted: 07/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Talha Qaiser
- Department of Computer Science; University of Warwick; Coventry UK
| | - Abhik Mukherjee
- Department of Histopathology; Division of Cancer and Stem Cells; School of Medicine; University of Nottingham; Nottingham UK
| | - Chaitanya Reddy PB
- Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering; Indian Institute of Technology; Guwahati India
| | - Sai D Munugoti
- Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering; Indian Institute of Technology; Guwahati India
| | - Vamsi Tallam
- Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering; Indian Institute of Technology; Guwahati India
| | - Tomi Pitkäaho
- Department of Computer Science; Maynooth University; Maynooth Ireland
| | - Taina Lehtimäki
- Department of Computer Science; Maynooth University; Maynooth Ireland
| | - Thomas Naughton
- Department of Computer Science; Maynooth University; Maynooth Ireland
| | | | - Aníbal Pedraza
- VISILAB, E.T.S.I.I; University of Castilla-La Mancha; Ciudad Real Spain
| | - Ramakrishnan Mukundan
- Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering; University of Canterbury; Canterbury New Zealand
| | - Matthew Smith
- Department of Statistics; University of Warwick; Coventry UK
| | - Abhir Bhalerao
- Department of Computer Science; University of Warwick; Coventry UK
| | - Erik Rodner
- Computer Vision Group; Friedrich Schiller University of Jena; Jena Germany
| | - Marcel Simon
- Computer Vision Group; Friedrich Schiller University of Jena; Jena Germany
| | - Joachim Denzler
- Computer Vision Group; Friedrich Schiller University of Jena; Jena Germany
| | - Chao-Hui Huang
- MSD International GmbH; Singapore Singapore
- Singapore Agency for Science, Technology and Research; Singapore Singapore
| | - Gloria Bueno
- VISILAB, E.T.S.I.I; University of Castilla-La Mancha; Ciudad Real Spain
| | - David Snead
- Department of Pathology; University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire; Coventry UK
| | - Ian O Ellis
- Department of Histopathology; Division of Cancer and Stem Cells; School of Medicine; University of Nottingham; Nottingham UK
| | - Mohammad Ilyas
- Department of Histopathology; Division of Cancer and Stem Cells; School of Medicine; University of Nottingham; Nottingham UK
- Nottingham Molecular Pathology Node; University of Nottingham; Nottingham UK
| | - Nasir Rajpoot
- Department of Computer Science; University of Warwick; Coventry UK
- Department of Pathology; University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire; Coventry UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Thomas JS, Hanby AM, Russell N, van Tienhoven G, Riddle K, Anderson N, Cameron DA, Bartlett JMS, Piper T, Cunningham C, Canney P, Kunkler IH. The BIG 2.04 MRC/EORTC SUPREMO Trial: pathology quality assurance of a large phase 3 randomised international clinical trial of postmastectomy radiotherapy in intermediate-risk breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 163:63-69. [PMID: 28190252 PMCID: PMC5387007 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4145-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2017] [Accepted: 02/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction SUPREMO is a phase 3 randomised trial evaluating radiotherapy post-mastectomy for intermediate-risk breast cancer. 1688 patients were enrolled from 16 countries between 2006 and 2013. We report the results of central pathology review carried out for quality assurance. Patients and methods A single recut haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) tumour section was assessed by one of two reviewing pathologists, blinded to the originally reported pathology and patient data. Tumour type, grade and lymphovascular invasion were reviewed to assess if they met the inclusion criteria. Slides from potentially ineligible patients on central review were scanned and reviewed online together by the two pathologists and a consensus reached. A subset of 25 of these cases was double-reported independently by the pathologists prior to the online assessment. Results The major contributors to the trial were the UK (75%) and the Netherlands (10%). There is a striking difference in lymphovascular invasion (LVi) rates (41.6 vs. 15.1% (UK); p = <0.0001) and proportions of grade 3 carcinomas (54.0 vs. 42.0% (UK); p = <0.0001) on comparing local reporting with central review. There was no difference in the locally reported frequency of LVi rates in node-positive (N+) and node-negative (N−) subgroups (40.3 vs. 38.0%; p = 0.40) but a significant difference in the reviewed frequency (16.9 vs. 9.9%; p = 0.004). Of the N− cases, 104 (25.1%) would have been ineligible by initial central review by virtue of grade and/or lymphovascular invasion status. Following online consensus review, this fell to 70 cases (16.3% of N− cases, 4.1% of all cases). Conclusions These data have important implications for the design, powering and interpretation of outcomes from this and future clinical trials. If critical pathology criteria are determinants for trial entry, serious consideration should be given to up-front central pathology review. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10549-017-4145-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J S Thomas
- Department of Pathology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
| | - A M Hanby
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - N Russell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Postbus 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - G van Tienhoven
- Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - K Riddle
- Scottish Clinical Trials Research Unit, NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, EH12 9EB, UK
| | - N Anderson
- Centre of Population Health Sciences, Edinburgh University Medical School, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK
| | - D A Cameron
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
| | - J M S Bartlett
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, M5G0A3, Canada
| | - T Piper
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
| | - C Cunningham
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
| | - P Canney
- Beatson Oncology Centre, Gartnavel Campus, Glasgow, G12 0YN, UK
| | - I H Kunkler
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rakha EA, Ahmed MA, Aleskandarany MA, Hodi Z, Lee AHS, Pinder SE, Ellis IO. Diagnostic concordance of breast pathologists: lessons from the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme Pathology External Quality Assurance Scheme. Histopathology 2016; 70:632-642. [DOI: 10.1111/his.13117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2016] [Accepted: 11/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Emad A Rakha
- Department of Histopathology; Nottingham City Hospital; Nottingham B UK
| | - Mohamed A Ahmed
- Department of Histopathology; Nottingham City Hospital; Nottingham B UK
| | | | - Zsolt Hodi
- Department of Histopathology; Nottingham City Hospital; Nottingham B UK
| | - Andrew H S Lee
- Department of Histopathology; Nottingham City Hospital; Nottingham B UK
| | - Sarah E Pinder
- Cancer Studies; King's College London; Guy's Hospital; London UK
| | - Ian O Ellis
- Department of Histopathology; Nottingham City Hospital; Nottingham B UK
| |
Collapse
|