Diagnostic immunohistochemistry in gynaecological neoplasia: a brief survey of the most common scenarios

Utilization of immunohistochemistry in gynecologic tumors: An expert review

The use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and molecular pathology has been widely adopted over the past 3 decades and has aided in the precision of diagnosing gynecologic tumors. While many tumors can be diagnosed by histologic appearance on routine hematoxylin and eosin stained slides, the use of IHC has dramatically changed practice, leading to a better understanding and subtyping of gynecologic tumors. This detailed classification of tumors has aided in the implementation and development of targeted therapies. Available IHC stains and their applications continue to rapidly evolve. Our review aims to provide updated information on the use of IHC in gynecologic tumors. We will also address the rationale for preferred therapeutic regimens that are personalized based on IHC.

Unsolved Issues in the Integrated Histo-Molecular Classification of Endometrial Carcinoma and Therapeutic Implications

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the most frequent gynecological cancer, with an increasing incidence and mortality in recent times. The last decade has represented a true revolution with the development of the integrated histo-molecular classification of EC, which allows for the stratification of patients with morphologically indistinguishable disease into groups with different prognoses. Particularly, the POLE-mutated subgroup exhibits outstanding survival. Nevertheless, the indiscriminate application of molecular classification appears premature. Its prognostic significance has been proven mainly in endometrioid EC, the most common histotype, but it has yet to be convincingly confirmed in the other minor histotypes, which indeed account for a relevant proportion of EC mortality. Moreover, its daily use both requires a mindful pathologist who is able to correctly evaluate and unambiguously report immunohistochemical staining used as a surrogated diagnostic tool and is hampered by the unavailability of POLE mutation analysis. Further molecular characterization of ECs is needed to allow for the identification of better-tailored therapies in different settings, as well as the safe avoidance of surgery for fertility preservation. Hopefully, the numerous ongoing clinical trials in the adjuvant and metastatic settings of EC will likely produce evidence to refine the histo-molecular classification and therapeutic guidelines. Our review aims to retrace the origin and evolution of the molecular classification for EC, reveal its strengths and limitations, show clinical relevance, and uncover the desired future developments.

Assessment of endometrial carcinoma on biopsy as a predictor of final surgical pathology: Are we doing it right? A completed audit cycle and recommendations

Background

Typing and grading of endometrial carcinomas (ECs) on small biopsy specimens is crucial to determine the need for full surgical staging. Histological subtype and grade are key factors available for risk stratification before surgery. However, this can be diagnostically challenging on small biopsy specimens, especially when morphologic features are subtle or overlapping.

Aims

The aims of this audit were to assess concordance of endometrial carcinomas on biopsy specimens with hysterectomy specimens and to determine if the immunohistochemistry (IHC) panel being used in our practice was adequately subtyping ECs.

Settings and Design

The audit was approved by the Clinical Effectiveness Team of the Royal College of Pathologists (UK) as meeting all the criteria and standards set out by the College.

Materials and Methods

Biopsies from 67 cases of EC were compared for histological subtype and grade of endometrioid carcinoma with resection specimens. A re-audit was carried out on 59 cases after implementation of changes recommended by the initial audit.

Results

Two of 35 (6%) tumours defined as G1 on biopsy were upgraded (to G2) on final pathology, as was one of 7 (14%) G2 tumours (to G3). One of these cases had solid areas just amounting to more than 6% on resection. In the second case, a comment was made that assessment had been difficult as the specimen was suboptimally fixed, but nuclei appeared atypical. Of seven G2 biopsies, one case was upgraded to grade 3 on final pathology based on proportion of solid areas. Our data show lower rates of discordance as compared to previous studies and on re-audit, the concordance between endometrioid and nonendometrioid serous carcinoma improved with the addition of immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) to biopsies.

Conclusions

PTEN IHC can complement other stains and aid in the distinction of grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma from serous carcinoma on endometrial biopsies.

SR-B1 and CD10 combined immunoprofile for differential diagnosis of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma and clear cell carcinoma of the ovary

Both clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC) and clear cell carcinoma of the ovary (CCOC) have a clear cytoplasmic morphological feature, hence it is difficult to identify metastatic ccRCC and CCOC by morphology alone. At present, there are no effective immunohistochemical markers to distinguish between these two tumors. Studies have shown that the clear cytoplasm of ccRCC is mainly caused by cholesterol-rich lipids in the cytoplasm, while that of CCOC is due to the accumulation of cytoplasmic glycogen.

OBJECTIVE

to hypothesize that the scavenger receptor class B-type 1 (SR-B1) protein responsible for HDL cholesterol uptake may be differentially expressed in ccRCC and CCOC, and high CD10 expression in the renal tubular epithelium may assist in distinguishing between ccRCC and CCOC.

METHODS

effective immunohistochemical markers were applied in 90 cases of renal clear cell carcinoma and 31 cases of ovarian cancer to distinguish between the two types of tumors.

RESULT

SR-B1 and CD10 expression is significantly higher in ccRCC than CCOC. Both SR-B1 and CD10 exhibited focal weak-medium intensity staining in CCOC, and their staining extent and intensity were significantly lower than ccRCC. The sensitivity and specificity of SR-B1 for identifying ccRCC were 74.4% and 83.9%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of CD10 for identifying CCOC were 93.3% and 80.6%, respectively. The combined SR-B1( +) CD10( +) immunoprofile supports the diagnosis of ccRCC with a specificity of 93.5%. The combined SR-B1(-) CD10(-) immunoprofile supports the diagnosis of CCOC with a specificity of 93.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

our findings demonstrate that the combination of SR-B1 and CD10 immunoprofiling is a valuable tool for differential diagnosis of ccRCC and CCOC.

Immunohistochemistry for the detection of BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins in patients with ovarian cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Loss of function in either breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1) or breast cancer type 2 susceptibility protein (BRCA2) is a major risk factor for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) development. BRCA1 or BRCA2 deficiencies are associated with short-term prognosis and might have importance for the treatment of women with the disease. However, the screening of all possible mechanisms of dysfunction is expensive, time-consuming and difficult to apply in clinical practice. On the other hand, immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a simple and reliable method to access the expression of several proteins in tumour tissues.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review aims to evaluate the current usage of IHC to detect BRCA1 and BRCA2 deficiencies in EOC. We searched and evaluated all primary literature on the use of IHC for evaluating BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins expression in EOC. The main concepts for the search were: ovarian neoplasms, IHC, BRCA1 and BRCA2.

RESULTS

Forty-four studies from 925 unique titles were included. A total of 4206 tumour samples were evaluated for BRCA1 and 1041 for BRCA2 expression. Twelve BRCA1 primary antibodies were used in 41 studies, and the most common was the MS110 clone (75.6%). Seven BRCA2 primary antibodies were used in ten studies. Using the cut-off of 10%, 47.0% of EOCs are associated with loss of BRCA1 and 34.5% with the loss of BRCA2 expression.

CONCLUSION

IHC was effective to detect loss of BRCA1 protein expression in EOC; however, data on BRCA2 expression were heterogeneous and difficult to interpret.

The Usefulness of Immunohistochemistry in the Differential Diagnosis of Lesions Originating from the Myometrium

Uterine leiomyomas (LMs), currently the most common gynecological complaint around the world, are a serious medical, social and economic problem. Accurate diagnosis is the necessary prerequisite of the diagnostic-therapeutic process. Statistically, mistakes may occur more often in case of disease entities with high prevalence rates. Histopathology, based on increasingly advanced immunohistochemistry methods, is routinely used in the diagnosis of neoplastic diseases. Markers of the highest sensitivity and specificity profiles are used in the process. As far as LMs are concerned, the crux of the matter is to identify patients with seemingly benign lesions which turn out to be suspicious (e.g., atypical LM) or malignant (e.g., leiomyosarcoma (LMS)), which is not uncommon. In this study, we present the current state of knowledge about the use of immunohistochemical markers in the differential diagnosis of LM, atypical LM, smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP), and LMS, as well as their clinical predictive value.