CDX-2 immunostaining in primary and secondary ovarian carcinomas

WT1 Positive Ovarian Endometrioid Tumors: Observations From Consult Cases and Strategies for Distinguishing From Serous Neoplasms

Ovarian endometrioid carcinoma, more than any other type of ovarian epithelial malignancy, demonstrates a varied morphology which can cause problems in diagnosis. In tubo-ovarian tumor pathology, WT1 is a commonly used marker as it is consistently expressed in low-grade and high-grade serous carcinomas and is often considered a specific marker of a serous phenotype. However, ovarian endometrioid neoplasms may also express WT1 which may contribute to misdiagnosis. We report our experience with 23 ovarian endometrioid neoplasms (4 borderline tumors, 19 carcinomas), mainly received in consultation, which were WT1 positive (diffuse in 11 cases) which often contributed to misdiagnosis. Endometriosis was identified in the same ovary in 6 cases and squamous elements in 7. We describe strategies for distinguishing such neoplasms, which may exhibit morphologic overlap with serous tumors, from low-grade and high-grade serous carcinomas and stress that a diagnosis of HGSC is unlikely with two grossly and histologically normal fallopian tubes. We also stress that a panel of markers should always be used rather than relying on a single marker and that when the morphology is classical of an endometrioid carcinoma, diagnostic immunohistochemistry is not needed given the potential for confusion in cases showing "aberrant" staining. We also discuss the phenomenon of "aberrant" immunohistochemical staining in endometrioid carcinomas which appears more common than in other ovarian carcinomas.

Practical Application of Lineage-Specific Immunohistochemistry Markers: Transcription Factors (Sometimes) Behaving Badly

CONTEXT.—

Transcription factors (TFs) are proteins that regulate gene expression and control RNA transcription from DNA. Lineage-specific TFs have increasingly been used by pathologists to determine tumor lineage, especially in the setting of metastatic tumors of unknown primary, among other uses. With experience gathered from its daily application and increasing pitfalls reported from immunohistochemical studies, these often-touted highly specific TFs are not as reliable as once thought.

OBJECTIVES.—

To summarize the established roles of many of the commonly used TFs in clinical practice and to discuss known and potential sources for error (eg, false-positivity from cross-reactivity, aberrant, and overlap "lineage-specific" expression) in their application and interpretation.

DATA SOURCES.—

Literature review and the authors' personal practice experience were used. Several examples selected from the University Health Network (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) are illustrated.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The application of TF diagnostic immunohistochemistry has enabled pathologists to better assess the lineage/origin of primary and metastatic tumors. However, the awareness of potential pitfalls is essential to avoid misdiagnosis.

Updates in Effusion Cytology

Effusion cytology plays multiple roles in the management of benign and malignant disease, from primary diagnosis to tissue allocation for ancillary diagnostic studies and biomarker testing of therapeutic targets. This article summarizes recent advances in pleural effusion cytology, with a focus on the practical application of immunohistochemical markers, cytogenetic techniques, flow cytometry, and molecular techniques for the diagnosis and management of primary and secondary neoplasms of the pleura.

Diagnostic immunohistochemistry in gynaecological neoplasia: a brief survey of the most common scenarios

Immunohistochemistry is a valuable adjunct in routine gynaecological pathology. The molecular revolution has redesigned knowledge of gynaecological cancers and refined histological classification. The direct consequence has been the progressive introduction of new immunostainings for diagnostic and classification purposes. Hence, we review the routine diagnostic use of immunohistochemistry in the field of gynaecological neoplasia. We reviewed the immunomarkers useful in gynaecological pathology according to literature revision, our personal experience and research findings. We discuss the application of immunohistochemistry to reach the most accurate diagnosis in morphologically equivocal cases of gynaecological pathology and present the appropriate panel of immunomarkers in the most common scenarios of gynaecological pathology. This short review provides an updated overview of the essential immunohistochemical markers currently used in the diagnostics of gynaecological malignancies along with their molecular rationale.

Dual Immunostain With SATB2 and CK20 Differentiates Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasms From Ovarian Mucinous Neoplasms

OBJECTIVES

Determination of the primary site of origin for mucinous neoplasms identified in the peritoneal and/or pelvic cavities may be challenging, with major differential diagnoses including appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (AMN) and ovarian mucinous neoplasm (OMN). Special AT-rich sequence binding protein 2 (SATB2) has been shown to be highly selectively expressed in the lower gastrointestinal tract, including the appendix.

METHODS

We investigated the utility of a dual stain (DS) with SATB2 or caudal type homeobox 2 (CDX2) and cytokeratin 20 (CK20) or villin in distinguishing AMNs from OMNs. Tissue microarrays with 40 AMNs and 18 OMNs were stained with SATB2 or CDX2 paired with either CK20 or villin.

RESULTS

SATB2 single stain showed a good sensitivity of 83% and the highest specificity of 78% for AMNs over OMNs among all four stains. DS with SATB2 and villin showed an identical sensitivity of 78% but specificity increased to 94%, while DS with SATB2 and CK20 showed a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 100%. In contrast, DS with CDX2 and CK20/villin showed slightly higher sensitivity but much lower specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

DS with SATB2/CK20 shows the greatest potential clinical utility in distinguishing AMNs from OMNs and is superior to DS with CDX2/CK20. Importantly, DS could be helpful for specimens with limited tissues.

Synchronous Ovarian and Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasms in the Absence of Pseudomyxoma Peritonei

Background

Synchronous ovarian/appendiceal mucinous neoplasms sometimes occur in the absence of clinical pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), which raises a question about whether the 2 tumors could be independent.

Methods

We identified 11 cases of synchronous ovarian/appendiceal mucinous neoplasms without PMP and subclassified them into groups 1 and 2 based on the presence or absence of microscopic peritoneal/ovarian surface mucin deposits. A 7-marker panel (CK7, CK20, CDX2, PAX8, MUC1, MUC2, and MUC5AC) immunohistochemistry was performed on both tumors.

Results

Between the 2 groups, there were no significant differences in age, laterality, size, and histology of ovarian/appendiceal tumors. In group 1, 2 of 4 cases developed PMP later, and both had ovarian surface and contralateral ovarian involvement and appendiceal perforation with microscopic mucin deposits on the peritoneum. No patients in group 2 developed PMP. All group 1 cases showed a high degree of concordance of immunoprofile between the synchronous tumors, with an identical expression of appendiceal pattern in greater than 90% of the markers. In group 2, only 1 of 7 cases showed concordance in all markers.

Conclusions

If peritoneal mucin deposits present, even microscopic and acellular, the synchronous tumors are most likely of a single appendiceal origin. Otherwise, they are more heterogeneous, and some may be truly dual primaries.

CDX2 immunostaining in primary and metastatic germ cell tumours of the testis

Objective To evaluate the immunohistochemical staining pattern of caudal type homeobox 2 (CDX2) protein in germ cell tumours (GCTs) of the testis. Methods This study reassessed archival tissue samples collected from patients diagnosed with primary and metastatic testicular GCTs for CDX2 immunoreactivity using standard immunohistochemical techniques. Positive nuclear immunostaining was evaluated with regard to both the staining intensity and the extent of the staining. Results Tissue sections from primary and metastatic testicular GCTs ( n = 104), germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNis) ( n = 5) and benign testicles ( n = 15) were analysed. The GCNis and benign testicular tissues showed no immunoreactivity for CDX2. Strong and diffuse staining of CDX2 was demonstrated only in the mature colonic epithelium of teratomas in both primary and metastatic GCTs. CDX2 positivity in other tumours (one pure yolk sac tumour, one yolk sac component of a mixed GCT and one pure seminoma) was infrequent, and was only weak and focal. Conclusions CDX2 immunostaining should be interpreted based on both the staining intensity and the extent of staining so as not to cause misdiagnosis. Teratomas with colonic-type epithelium should be considered in the differential diagnosis if a metastatic tumour with an unknown primary shows prominent CDX2 immunostaining.

Demonstration of CDX2 is highly antibody dependant

OBJECTS

CDX2 is a widely used immunohistochemical marker for intestinal differentiation in neoplasms. In the Nordic Immunohistochemical Quality Control external quality assessment scheme, only 45% of the laboratories participating in the CDX2 challenge in 2009 produced sufficient staining. A major cause of insufficient staining results appeared to be less successful primary antibody (Ab) clones. To evaluate the Ab performance in a standardized way, a comparative study was carried out.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tissue microarrays containing 309 non-neoplastic tissues and tumor samples with expected high, low, and no CDX2 expression were used. Five Abs were selected for comparison: EPR2764Y concentrated (Conc), EPR2764Y in a ready-to-use format, and DAK-CDX2, AMT28, and CDX2-88, all Conc. The CDX2 stains were scored blindly using the H-score method. Tissue/tumor samples with a maximum H-score of 150 to 300 (on the basis of the staining giving the highest score) were classified as CDX2 high expressors, samples with a maximum H-score of 10 to 149 as low expressors, and samples with a maximum H-score <10 as negative.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

A total of 106 tumors were CDX2 positive with at least one of the Abs. For 56 high-expressor tumors, the mean H-scores with EPR2764Y Conc, EPR2764Y ready-to-use, DAK-CDX2, AMT28, and CDX2-88 were 262, 236, 234, 167, and 149, respectively, and the percentage of positive tumors 100, 100, 100, 98, and 93, respectively. For 50 low-expressor tumors, the mean H-scores with the same Abs were 59, 26, 28, 7, and 5, respectively, and the percentage of positive tumors 98, 58, 64, 18, and 14, respectively. With EPR2764Y Conc, CDX2 was demonstrated in 5/19 (26%) urothelial carcinomas, 7/64 (11%) lung adenocarcinomas, 5/30 (17%) large cell/sarcomatoid lung carcinomas, and 4/19 (21%) esophagus squamous cell carcinomas. In-house optimized protocols gave for all 4 Conc Abs better staining results than the vendors' recommended protocols. The sensitivity of CDX2 Abs and protocols must be taken into consideration when classifying neoplasms of unknown origin.

Immunohistochemistry of colorectal carcinoma: current practice and evolving applications

The relatively high incidence of adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum (colorectal carcinoma) in the general population makes its pathologic diagnosis one of the more frequent exercises in anatomical pathology. Although typically mundane in the primary setting, the correct identification of metastatic colorectal carcinoma or exclusion of metastatic disease from carcinoma arising in other anatomical foci can be problematic. The advent of targeted therapies and refinement of more traditional cytotoxic chemotherapeutic regimens mandates not only a more confident appraisal of site of origin but also assessment of those tumor-specific features that may alter therapeutic decisions. Despite the exponential increase in our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of colorectal carcinoma, immunohistochemistry remains the foundation for resolution of these problematic cases and the number of antibodies available to the practicing pathologist continues to expand at a steady rate. In some cases, immunohistochemistry may also provide valuable prognostic information, either independently or as a surrogate marker for a specific route of carcinogenesis such as microsatellite instability. This review will focus on the use of new and more established immunohistochemistry markers in the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma, with an emphasis on aberrant staining patterns of the various colorectal carcinoma subtypes as well as the utility of these markers in specific differential diagnostic settings.

Differentiating rectal carcinoma by an immunohistological analysis of carcinomas of pelvic organs based on the NCBI Literature Survey and the Human Protein Atlas database

The treatments and prognoses of pelvic organ carcinomas differ, depending on whether the primary tumor originated in the rectum, urinary bladder, prostate, ovary, or uterus; therefore, it is essential to diagnose pathologically the primary origin and stages of these tumors. To establish the panels of immunohistochemical markers for differential diagnosis, we reviewed 91 of the NCBI articles on these topics and found that the results correlated closely with those of the public protein database, the Human Protein Atlas. The results revealed the panels of immunohistochemical markers for the differential diagnosis of rectal adenocarcinoma, in which [+] designates positivity in rectal adenocarcinoma and [-] designates negativity in rectal adenocarcinoma: from bladder adenocarcinoma, CDX2[+], VIL1[+], KRT7[-], THBD[-] and UPK3A[-]; from prostate adenocarcinoma, CDX2[+], VIL1[+], CEACAM5[+], KLK3(PSA)[-], ACPP(PAP)[-] and SLC45A3(prostein)[-]; and from ovarian mucinous adenocarcinoma, CEACAM5[+], VIL1[+], CDX2[+], KRT7[-] and MUC5AC[-]. The panels of markers distinguishing ovarian serous adenocarcinoma, cervical carcinoma, and endometrial adenocarcinoma were also represented. Such a comprehensive review on the differential diagnosis of carcinomas of pelvic organs has not been reported before. Thus, much information has been accumulated in public databases to provide an invaluable resource for clinicians and researchers.

CDX2 as a marker for intestinal differentiation: Its utility and limitations

CDX2 is a nuclear homeobox transcription factor that belongs to the caudal-related family of CDX homeobox genes. The gene encoding CDX2 is a nonclustered hexapeptide located on chromosome 13q12-13. Homeobox genes play an essential role in the control of normal embryonic development. CDX2 is crucial for axial patterning of the alimentary tract during embryonic development and is involved in the processes of intestinal cell proliferation, differentiation, adhesion, and apoptosis. It is considered specific for enterocytes and has been used for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma. CDX2 expression has been reported to be organ specific and is normally expressed throughout embryonic and postnatal life within the nuclei of epithelial cells of the alimentary tract from the proximal duodenum to the distal rectum. In this review, the authors elaborate on the diagnostic utility of CDX2 in gastrointestinal tumors and other neoplasms with intestinal differentiation. Limitations with its use as the sole predictor of a gastrointestinal origin of metastatic carcinomas are also discussed.

Immunohistochemistry in the distinction between primary and metastatic ovarian mucinous neoplasms: Table 1

The distinction between a primary and metastatic mucinous carcinoma within the ovary may be problematic. In most cases, the distinction can be made by careful pathological examination encompassing both the gross and microscopic findings and taking into account the distribution of the disease. However, immunohistochemistry may be of value in certain scenarios. In this review, I discuss the value of markers in the distinction between primary ovarian mucinous neoplasms and metastatic mucinous carcinomas from the colorectum, appendix, pancreas, biliary tract, stomach and cervix, the most common primary sites which give rise to metastatic mucinous carcinoma within the ovary. There is a significant degree of immunophenotypic overlap between primary ovarian mucinous neoplasms and metastatic mucinous carcinomas from the gastrointestinal tract, especially the upper gastrointestinal type; this is because most primary ovarian mucinous carcinomas and borderline tumours are of so-called intestinal or enteric type and exhibit some degree of positivity with enteric markers. Mullerian type primary ovarian mucinous neoplasms also exist and exhibit distinct immunohistochemical differences to the more common intestinal type.

Metastatic Neoplasms Involving the Ovary

In this review, ovarian metastatic carcinomas from various sites, as well as other neoplasms secondarily involving the ovary, are discussed. As well as describing the morphology, the value of immunohistochemistry in distinguishing between primary and metastatic neoplasms in the ovary is discussed. While immunohistochemistry has a valuable role to play and is paramount in some cases, the results should be interpreted with caution and with regard to the clinical picture and gross and microscopic pathologic findings.

Mucinous Neoplasms of the Vermiform Appendix

Most epithelial neoplasms of the vermiform appendix are of mucinous type and can be stratified into 3 main diagnostic categories: (1) adenoma, (2) mucinous neoplasms of uncertain malignant potential or low-grade mucinous neoplasm, and (3) adenocarcinoma. Clinically, appendiceal mucinous adenomas and adenocarcinomas may present as right lower abdominal pain mimicking acute appendicitis, a mass, or pseudomyxoma peritonei. Nomenclature currently in use to describe and diagnose mucinous tumors of the appendix, particularly those of low morphologic grade, varies among surgical pathologists and centers, resulting in different histologic and clinical features being attributed to these entities in the literature. It may be of help, as already attempted by some investigators, to simply apply algorithmic parameters for such lesions (grade of the primary lesion, extensiveness and composite of extra-appendiceal involvement, and so forth), instead of adopting rigid classification categories. This approach allows for more objective data to be collected in hopes that it will provide a more nuanced understanding of the clinical behavior of the spectrum of mucinous appendiceal tumors. Remaining focused on histopathologic parameters of the primary and secondary sites of involvement may help in avoiding circular reasoning.

Clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical profile of ovarian metastases from colorectal carcinoma

Metastasis of colorectal adenocarcinoma of the ovary is not an uncommon occurrence and ovarian metastases from colorectal carcinoma frequently mimic endometrioid and mucinous primary ovarian carcinoma. The clinical and pathologic features of metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma involving the ovary is reviewed with particular focus on the diagnostic challenge of distinguishing these secondary ovarian tumors from primary ovarian neoplasm. Immunohistochemical stains that may be useful in the differential diagnosis of metastatic colorectal tumors to the ovary and primary ovarian tumors are detailed.

CK7, CK20, CDX2 and MUC2 Immunohistochemical staining used to distinguish metastatic colorectal carcinoma involving ovary from primary ovarian mucinous adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Colorectal adenocarcinoma, the most common tumor that metastasizes to the ovary, is often difficult to distinguish from primary ovarian mucinous adenocarcinoma (POMA). Obtaining the correct diagnosis is difficult but crucial to treatment and prognosis.

METHODS

We evaluated the immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of cytokeratin 7 (CK7), cytokeratin 20 (CK20), CDX2, CEA, MUC2, MUC5AC and alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) in 22 POMAs and 41 metastatic colorectal adenocarcinomas (MCAOs) involving ovaries.

RESULTS

MCAOs, in contrast with POMAs, were almost always negative for MUC5 (97.6%), often negative for CK7 (82.9%), focal or diffuse positive for CDX2 (73.2%), diffuse positive for CK20 (65.9%), focal or diffuse positive for MUC2 (51.2%), diffuse positive for CEA (41.5%) and negative for AMACR (41.5%). We therefore considered CK7 (-), CK20 (diffuse +), CDX2 (+) and MUC2 (+) to be colonic markers and regarded cases with expression of more than two colonic markers as MCAO, those with no expression of colonic markers as POMA and those with expression of one colonic marker as indeterminate. Using CK7/CK20/CDX2/MUC2, 82.5% of the cases were correctly classified, 6.3% were misclassified and 6.3% were indeterminate.

CONCLUSION

CK7, CK20, CDX2 and MUC2 IHC staining is a useful adjunctive diagnostic tool to differentiate MCAOs from POMAs, in addition to clinical history and gross and microscopic findings.

CDX-2 expression is a common event in primary intestinal-type endocervical adenocarcinoma

We studied the expression of cytokeratin (CK) 7, CK20, CDX-2, and p16 in 119 cervical adenocarcinomas (65 usual type [50 invasive; 15 in situ], 37 intestinal type [21 invasive; 16 in situ], 10 endometrioid, 5 adenosquamous, and 2 signet-ring carcinomas) in comparison with 55 cases of rectal adenocarcinomas. The percentage of cells staining was considered negative if 0% to 5% stained; more than 5% was considered positive. For p16, staining of more than 50% was considered positive. CK7 was expressed in all cervical cases and in 12 rectal adenocarcinomas (22%). CK20 was expressed in 17 cervical adenocarcinomas (14.3%) and in 48 rectal adenocarcinomas (87%). CK20 immunostaining was diffuse in the majority of rectal tumors but focal in most cervical tumors. CDX-2 was expressed in all cases of rectal adenocarcinoma and in 46 cervical adenocarcinomas (38.7%): usual type, 10 (15%); intestinal type, 31 (84%); endometrioid type, 5 (50%); adenosquamous and signet-ring types, 0 (0%). CDX-2 is a marker for intestinal differentiation irrespective of a rectal or cervical origin. Therefore, it should not be used as the sole basis to confirm the colorectum as the primary origin in metastatic cases.

Primary pulmonary adenocarcinoma with intestinal differentiation mimicking metastatic colorectal carcinoma: case report and review of literature

Pulmonary adenocarcinoma with intestinal differentiation is rare and typically expresses proteins common to lung primaries. We report a case in a 51-year-old woman with a solitary 3.3-cm mass in the left lower lobe. Additional clinical investigation, including positron emission tomography scan with fluorine 18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose, colonoscopy, and capsule endoscopy of her small bowel, revealed no evidence of tumor elsewhere. She underwent left lower lobectomy with mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Histologic examination revealed tall columnar cells without goblet cell differentiation arranged in a cribriform and acinar pattern with extensive central necrosis. Metastatic carcinoma was present in multiple hilar lymph nodes. Mediastinal lymph nodes were negative. Immunohistochemical stains demonstrated diffuse positivity for cytokeratin (CK) 20 and CDX-2 in neoplastic cells with negative staining for CK7 and thyroid transcription factor-1. CK7 expression has been documented in all 14 cases previously reported. This is the first description of pulmonary adenocarcinoma with intestinal differentiation with histopathologic and immunophenotypic findings indistinguishable from metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Comprehensive evaluation of CDX2 in invasive cervical adenocarcinomas: immunopositivity in the absence of overt colorectal morphology

CDX2 is a member of the caudal-related homeobox gene family that is expressed during the normal development of the intestinal tract. In addition to staining adenocarcinomas of the alimentary system, studies have demonstrated CDX2 positivity in a percentage of ovarian mucinous and endometrioid tumors, carcinoids, and some adenocarcinomas of other sites such as the urinary bladder, prostate, lung, and pancreas. However, CDX2 immunostaining in cervical adenocarcinomas has not been examined in detail with comparison to important clinicopathologic characteristics including histopathologic subtype, tumor stage, and patient follow-up. In this study of 81 invasive cervical adenocarcinomas, 24 of the cases (30%) demonstrated nuclear positivity. Ten of the 15 (67%) endometrioid tumors had positive nuclear staining, compared with 7 of the 33 (21%) endocervical "usual-type" carcinomas, and 7 of the 33 (21%) remaining subtypes (adenosquamous, glassy cell, clear cell, serous, villoglandular, enteric). The frequency of nuclear staining for the endometrioid subtype was significantly different compared with that for the endocervical and other subtypes (P=0.003). Some cases showed granular cytoplasmic staining with or without corresponding nuclear positivity. Positive nuclear or cytoplasmic staining for CDX2 did not correlate with disease stage or patient outcome. Our results indicate that cervical adenocarcinomas can show nuclear immunopositivity for CDX2 even in the absence of overt morphologic features of colorectal differentiation. The frequency and pattern of CDX2 staining in the more common histologic subtypes of cervical adenocarcinoma (endocervical usual-type and endometrioid) is parallel to that which is seen for adenocarcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract and pancreaticobiliary system.

Aberrant Cdx2 expression in endometrial lesions with squamous differentiation: important role of Cdx2 in squamous morula formation

Only a few reports have described Cdx2 expression in endometrial lesions of the uterus. Our aim was to determine whether Cdx2 expression is related to squamous differentiation in endometrial lesions. Furthermore, we examined whether there is any correlation between Cdx2 and beta-catenin, a well-known marker of aberrant nuclear accumulation in endometrial squamous foci secondary to mutation. We performed immunohistochemical analysis of 225 cases (29 normal endometrium, 28 nonproliferative conditions, 21 polyps, 46 hyperplasias, and 101 endometrioid carcinomas) that included 72 cases (4 polyps, 16 hyperplasias, and 52 carcinomas) showing morular or keratinizing squamous differentiation (SD(+)). Normal endometrium and nonproliferative conditions showed no staining for Cdx2. Whereas there was a low rate of Cdx2 positivity in SD(-) polyps (5.9%) and hyperplasias (10%), all SD(+) lesions expressed Cdx2 (P < .001). Thirty-eight (73%) of the SD(+) carcinomas were positive for Cdx2, whereas only 6 SD(-) cases (14.0%) were positive (P < .001). Furthermore, the larger the number of squamous foci, the greater the number of Cdx2-positive cells that was found. The labeling indices of Cdx2 were significantly higher in morular components than in keratinizing or glandular ones (P < .001). There was a strong correlation of the labeling indices of Cdx2 and beta-catenin in squamous foci of hyperplasias and carcinomas. Using immunofluorescence, we confirmed the coexpression of the 2 markers. The Cdx2 protein is expressed frequently in endometrial lesions with squamous differentiation, especially morular-type differentiation, and correlates strongly with nuclear beta-catenin expression. These facts suggest that Cdx2 plays an important role in squamous morula formation.

Application of immunohistochemistry to gynecologic pathology

CONTEXT

A large variety of tumors and lesions arise in the female genital tract. Although the majority of these can be correctly recognized on routine hematoxylin-eosin-stained slides, occasional cases present a diagnostic challenge. Immunohistochemical stains are extremely useful in resolving many of these problematic cases. As the knowledge in this area is constantly expanding, it is useful to have this updated information in a review form for easy access.

OBJECTIVE

To present our current knowledge of immunohistochemistry of the lesions of the female genital tract in a readily accessible form.

DATA SOURCES

The review is based on previously published articles on this topic.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunohistochemical stains help in reaching a conclusive diagnosis in a variety of problematic lesions seen in gynecologic pathology. As in any other system, immunohistochemical findings need to be interpreted in light of the clinical history and morphologic findings.

Intestinal-type cervical adenocarcinoma in situ and adenocarcinoma exhibit a partial enteric immunophenotype with consistent expression of CDX2

Most cases of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and adenocarcinoma are of the usual or endocervical type. However, intestinal types of AIS and adenocarcinoma exist. With an intestinal-type adenocarcinoma in the cervix, the question may arise as to whether one is dealing with a primary cervical neoplasm or direct or secondary spread from an intestinal adenocarcinoma. In organs such as the ovary, urinary bladder, esophagus, and gallbladder, intestinal-type glandular epithelium often expresses enteric markers, but this has hardly been studied in the cervix. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether intestinal-type AIS and adenocarcinoma in the cervix express enteric markers and to ascertain whether these antibodies are of value in the distinction from a metastatic intestinal adenocarcinoma. We compared the immunophenotype of these lesions with that of usual-type AIS and adenocarcinomain the cervix. Cases included were AIS of usual type (n = 6), primary cervical adenocarcinoma of usual type (n = 6), AIS of intestinal type (n = 21), primary cervical adenocarcinoma of intestinal type (n = 3), primary cervical adenocarcinoma with signet ring cells (n = 2), and colorectal adenocarcinoma involving the cervix (n = 5). All cases were stained with cytokeratin (CK) 7, CK20, monoclonal carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), p16, and CDX2. Staining was categorized as negative, focally positive (<50% cells), or diffusely positive (50% or more cells). Usual-type AIS was always diffusely CK7 positive, typically diffusely CEA and p16 positive, and always CK20 negative. CDX2 was positive in 1 case. All usual cervical adenocarcinomas were diffusely CK7 and p16 positive, and all were immunoreactive with CEA. Five and 2 cases were CK20 and CDX2 positive, respectively. Intestinal-type AIS was diffusely CK7 positive (all cases) and typically CK20 negative and diffusely CEA and p16 positive. All but 1 case exhibited diffuse nuclear positivity with CDX2. In addition, usual-type AIS adjacent to intestinal type was CDX2 positive in 13 of 21 cases. The 3 cases of primary cervical intestinal-type adenocarcinoma were diffusely CK7 positive, focally or diffusely positive with CK20 and CDX2, and focally positive with CEA. One case was diffusely p16 positive, 1 focal and 1 negative. The foci of signet ring cells in the 2 primary cervical adenocarcinomas were diffusely CK7 and p16 positive and negative with CK20 and CDX2. Colorectal adenocarcinomas involving the cervix were typically diffusely positive with CK20, CEA, and CDX2; negative with CK7; and negative or focally positive with p16. Intestinal types of cervical AIS and adenocarcinoma exhibit a partial enteric immunophenotype, usually with diffuse expression of CDX2 and, in some cases, staining with CK20. They maintain their CK7 immunoreactivity and are usually p16 positive. Although there is immunophenotypic overlap, focal staining with CK20 together with diffuse CK7 and sometimes p16 positivity helps to distinguish intestinal types of cervical adenocarcinoma from involvement by a colorectal adenocarcinoma; CEA and CDX2 are of no value in this regard. CDX2 positivity in usual-type AIS adjacent to intestinal type and in occasional cases of pure usual-type AIS may be a reflection of early intestinal differentiation before this is morphologically apparent. Using a set of cases of AIS diagnosed in a single institution over a 7-year period (77 usual type; 13 intestinal type), intestinal type was more likely to be associated with early invasive adenocarcinoma than usual type (31% vs 17%), suggesting that intestinal differentiation may be a risk factor for invasion in premalignant cervical glandular lesions.

Immunohistochemical biomarkers of value in distinguishing primary ovarian carcinoma from gastric carcinoma: a systematic review with statistical meta-analysis

AIMS

To compare the relative risk of antigen expression being detected immunohistochemically in ovarian and gastric carcinoma aggregated from studies performed for diagnostic purposes, with the relative risks of their expression in all patients in the English literature.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Both types of series indicated that cytokeratin (CK) 7 expression was greater and that of CK20 and carcinoembryonic antigen less in ovarian than in gastric carcinoma (P < 0.05). Synthesis of all data available for MUC-2 suggested it was more commonly expressed in ovarian carcinoma, whereas the relative risk in papers that directly compared its expression suggested that it was more common in the gastric carcinoma (P = 0.2, NS). Aggregating all possible data suggested villin was more likely to be expressed in ovarian cancers, whereas studies in which its expression was compared directly in both tumours suggested the opposite. Although statistically significant, patient numbers were small.

CONCLUSION

Provided sufficient numbers of cases are studied, analysis of studies comparing antigen expression for diagnostic purposes in tumours from two body sites is likely to be supported in the wider literature. The design of such comparative studies is informed by aggregating data from single tumour studies.

Ovarian Mucinous Tumors Associated With Mature Cystic Teratomas

Most primary ovarian mucinous tumors are of surface epithelial-stromal origin and exhibit diffuse expression of cytokeratin 7 (CK7) combined with variable expression of cytokeratin 20 (CK20); this immunoprofile distinguishes them from most lower gastrointestinal tract tumors secondarily involving the ovaries. The uncommon ovarian mucinous tumors of germ cell (teratomatous) origin have not been extensively evaluated to determine the utility of these markers and other markers of intestinal differentiation for distinguishing these tumors from metastatic gastrointestinal tract mucinous tumors. Immunohistochemical expression of CK7, CK20, CDX2, and villin was assessed in 44 ovarian mucinous tumors associated with a mature cystic teratoma. All cases lacked evidence of a nonovarian primary mucinous tumor. All mucinous tumors were unilateral; 6 cases had bilateral teratomas. All tumors displayed gastrointestinal-type mucinous differentiation, with epithelium that was commonly goblet cell-rich or hypermucinous; 21 were associated with pseudomyxoma ovarii and 3 of these had pseudomyxoma peritonei. Tumor architecture ranged from purely cystadenomatous (n=24), to proliferative (n=13), to carcinomatous (n=6); some tumors had admixtures of these patterns. One tumor had a goblet cell carcinoidlike pattern with pseudomyxoma ovarii. Three carcinomas had a signet ring cell component. Cystadenomatous tumors without pseudomyxoma ovarii (n=15) exhibited all possible CK7/CK20 coordinate expression profiles with nearly equal frequency. All proliferative tumors without pseudomyxoma ovarii (n=8) expressed CK7, most often in combination with CK20 expression. All cystadenomatous and proliferative tumors with pseudomyxoma ovarii (n=9 and n=5) were CK7-/CK20+. All carcinomatous tumors had pseudomyxoma ovarii; 3 were CK7-/CK20+, 2 were CK7+/CK20+, and 1 was CK7+/CK20-. The presence of pseudomyxoma ovarii was significantly associated with a CK7-/CK20+ profile (86% with pseudomyxoma ovarii vs. 13% without, P<0.0001), CDX2 positivity (79% vs. 0%, P<0.0001), and villin positivity (57% vs. 5%, P=0.0009). A subset of mucinous tumors associated with mature cystic teratomas exhibiting morphologic and immunohistochemical features of lower intestinal tract-type mucinous tumors may be teratomatous in origin. In practice, the more common diagnosis of secondary involvement by a lower intestinal tract mucinous tumor should be addressed in the pathology report and in subsequent clinical evaluation; interpretation as a true primary ovarian mucinous tumor of teratomatous origin can be considered as an alternative diagnosis when evaluation and follow-up fail to identify a nonovarian source of the mucinous tumor. Those tumors having CK7 expression with or without CK20 expression may be derived from upper gastrointestinal tract-type or sinonasal-type teratomatous elements but could be independent tumors of surface epithelial-stromal origin.

Ovarian mucinous tumour arising in mature cystic teratoma and associated with pseudomyxoma peritonei: report of two cases and comparison with ovarian involvement by low-grade appendiceal mucinous tumour

AIMS

It is currently accepted that primary ovarian tumours rarely, if ever, give rise to mucinous ascites/pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) which most commonly results from the intra-abdominal spread of an appendiceal mucinous neoplasm. However, primary ovarian mucinous tumours of appendiceal type arising within mature cystic teratomas appear to represent an exception to this rule. In this report two further examples of this rare tumour are described, and the immunohistological phenotype including expression of MUC proteins is compared with secondary ovarian involvement by low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm.

METHODS

Two cases of ovarian mucinous tumour associated with mature cystic teratoma and PMP are described. The tumours were examined immunohistochemically for expression of cytokeratin (CK)7, CK20, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CDX-2, MUC2, MUC5AC and MUC6. The results were compared with four cases of ovarian neoplasia secondary to primary appendiceal low-grade mucinous tumour.

RESULTS

The ovarian mucinous tumours associated with mature cystic teratomas were morphologically similar to those secondary to appendiceal neoplasia. They comprised irregularly distributed glands and cysts lined by tall, mucin-rich epithelial cells exhibiting focal villoglandular architecture and low grade cytological atypia. The immunophenotype of the teratoma-associated tumours and those secondary to appendiceal neoplasia was identical: there was strong and diffuse expression of CK20, CEA, CDX-2, MUC2 and MUC5AC with no reactivity for the other antisera tested.

CONCLUSIONS

PMP associated with primary ovarian neoplasia is rare, and probably restricted to mucinous tumours arising in mature cystic teratomas. The immunohistological findings in this study further support the view that such tumours exhibit a lower gastrointestinal and, more specifically, appendiceal phenotype. Careful examination and sampling of the ovaries may be required to demonstrate the teratomatous component of these tumours.

CDX-2 expression in pseudomyxoma peritonei: a clinicopathological study of 42 cases

AIMS

CDX-2 is a highly sensitive and specific marker of intestinal epithelial cells and their neoplastic counterparts. CDX-2 status in pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) has been barely reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological features of 42 cases of PMP with a special emphasis on CDX-2.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All patients were treated by cytoreduction. Immunohistochemistry was performed for CDX-2, MUC-2, MUC-5AC, cytokeratin (CK) 7 and CK20. Statistical correlation was evaluated for age, sex, completeness of cytoreduction and histological subtype with overall and progression-free survival (OS and PFS). PMP consisted of 32 cases of disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis and 10 cases of peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis. The appendix evaluated in 25 cases showed two mucinous adenocarcinomas and 21 low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms. CDX-2 was diffusely positive in 40 cases, with the remaining two cases being focally positive. All cases demonstrated diffuse reactions to CK20 and MUC-2, and variable reactions to MUC-5AC, while CK7 was variably positive in 38 cases. Five-year OS was 97%. Histological type was significantly correlated with PFS (P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

CDX-2 is diffusely and strongly positive in PMP. This is a useful marker to confirm an appendiceal origin of PMP, particularly when used in conjunction with CK7, CK20, MUC-2 and MUC-5AC.

Immunohistochemical expression of CDX2 in primary ovarian mucinous tumors and metastatic mucinous carcinomas involving the ovary: comparison with CK20 and correlation with coordinate expression of CK7

Recent studies have demonstrated conflicting results regarding the value of CDX2 for distinguishing primary ovarian mucinous tumors from metastatic mucinous carcinomas in the ovary. Utility of coordinate expression of cytokeratins 7 and 20 is restricted to distinction of ovarian mucinous tumors from lower gastrointestinal tract metastases and data comparing coordinate expression of all three markers is limited. Immunohistochemical studies were performed to compare expression of CDX2 and cytokeratin 20, both markers of intestinal differentiation, in conjunction with coordinate expression of cytokeratin 7, in 90 mucinous tumors involving the ovary: 42 primary ovarian mucinous tumors (31 atypical proliferative (borderline) mucinous tumors (gastrointestinal type), 11 mucinous carcinomas) and 48 metastatic mucinous carcinomas of upper (pancreaticobiliary tract: 14; stomach: five) and lower (colon and rectum: 25; appendix: four) gastrointestinal tract origin. Primary ovarian tumors expressed CDX2 (40%) less frequently than cytokeratin 20 (83%) (P<0.0001). CDX2 expression in primary ovarian tumors (40%) was lower than CDX2 expression in metastatic carcinomas of both upper (74%; P=0.016) and lower gastrointestinal tract origin (90%; P<0.0001). Cytokeratin 20 expression was similar in primary ovarian tumors (83%) and metastases of upper (89%; P=0.071) and lower gastrointestinal tract origin (93%; P=0.29). Thus, as a single marker CDX2 offers some advantage over cytokeratin 20 because it is less frequently positive in primary ovarian tumors. In the almost universally cytokeratin 7-positive primary ovarian tumors and metastases of upper gastrointestinal tract origin, CDX2 coordinate expression was less common in primary ovarian tumors (36%) than in metastases of upper gastrointestinal tract origin (63%) (P=0.022) whereas cytokeratin 20 coordinate expression was identical in both tumor types (79%). In the almost universally cytokeratin 7-negative metastases of lower gastrointestinal tract origin, coordinate expression of CDX2 (83%) and cytokeratin 20 (86%) were equivalent (P=1.00). CDX2 was comparable to cytokeratin 20 in distinguishing metastases of lower gastrointestinal tract origin (usually cytokeratin 7-negative and CDX2/cytokeratin 20 positive) from primary ovarian tumors and metastases of upper gastrointestinal tract origin (usually cytokeratin 7-positive and CDX2/cytokeratin 20 variable). CDX2 provided some advantage over cytokeratin 20 for distinguishing primary ovarian mucinous tumors from metastases of upper but not lower gastrointestinal tract origin; however, the advantage in the former was limited due to the occurrence of shared coordinate expression profiles in both tumor types. Cytokeratin 7 provides the predominant discriminatory value among these markers yet is limited to distinction of primary ovarian tumors from metastases of lower gastrointestinal tract origin.

Immunohistochemical and functional biomarkers of value in female genital tract lesions

There has been a marked expansion in the literature pertaining to the use of immunohistochemical markers in female genital tract pathology, especially with regard to diagnosis. This review provides a survey of the antibodies commonly used in the diagnosis of gynecological lesions grouped as to function or type. Prognostic or predictive markers are also discussed where appropriate, although few of these are of value in everyday practice. It is stressed that when immunohistochemistry is used diagnostically, panels of markers provide better information than reliance on a single antibody.

Expression of CDX2 in benign tissue and adenocarcinoma of the prostate

Numerous studies have claimed that CDX2 is relatively specific and sensitive in establishing a gastrointestinal origin in metastatic tumors of unknown origin. We have recently seen 2 cases of prostatic adenocarcinoma (PCa) on needle biopsies with diffuse strong nuclear staining for CDX2 sent for consultation. One case was a prostatic duct adenocarcinoma in a man with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value of 327 ng/mL, and the other was a PCa with a Gleason score (GS) of 4 + 4 = 8 in a man with a PSA value of 15 ng/mL. An adenocarcinoma with GS 3 + 3 = 6 from the contralateral side did not express CDX2. Because documented examples of this phenomenon are rare, we investigated the immunoexpression of CDX2, using tissue microarrays (TMAs). Three slides of TMAs were used to stain 708 tissue samples (0.6 mm in diameter) containing either benign or malignant prostate tissue, as well as control tissues from various anatomical sites including colon. In total, 195 samples of primary PCa with GS of 6 (n = 41), 7 (n = 21), and 8 (n = 8); 195 samples of benign prostate tissue; and 185 samples of metastatic PCa were studied. Of 70 radical prostatectomy specimens examined for PCa in TMAs, 4 (5.7%) were positive for CDX2, showing Gleason score of 6 (n = 3) and Gleason score of 7 (n = 1). Focal moderate positive staining was seen in benign prostate tissue in 7 (11.7%) of 60 radical prostatectomy specimens. None of the metastatic PCa expressed CDX2. CDX2 may uncommonly be focally expressed in benign prostatic glands. Staining in PCa is less common and appears independent of GS and is usually patchy and focal and of lesser intensity than in colonic tissue. However, rarely strong and diffuse staining may be seen. Positive CDX2 staining in high-grade prostate cancer (ductal, cribriform, and solid) may be confused with secondary carcinoma of colonic origin. Routine histopathology, positive PSA immunostaining, and clinical findings can help confirm the correct diagnosis.

Low meprin alpha expression differentiates primary ovarian mucinous carcinoma from gastrointestinal cancers that commonly metastasise to the ovaries

BACKGROUND

Currently, no specific immunohistochemical markers are available to differentiate primary mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer (MOC) from adenocarcinomas originating at other sites that have metastasised to the ovary, which may have an impact on patient management and prognosis.

AIM

To investigate the expression of two intestinal markers, galectin 4 and meprin alpha, in mucinous carcinomas of the ovary and gastrointestinal tract.

METHODS

Using immunohistochemical analysis, the expression of galectin 4 and meprin alpha was investigated in 10 MOCs and in 38 mucinous adenocarcinomas of colon, pancreas, stomach and appendix, the most common sites of origin of ovarian metastases.

RESULTS

Total cytoplasmic galectin 4 expression was relatively consistent between the different carcinomas. Membranous meprin alpha expression was significantly lower in MOCs compared with gastrointestinal carcinomas. Moreover, meprin alpha expression showed greater discrimination between the ovarian and gastrointestinal carcinomas than the cytokeratins CK7 and CK20, the current standard immunohistochemical markers used to determine the tissue origin of mucinous carcinomas involving the ovaries.

CONCLUSIONS

Meprin alpha is a useful additional marker in differentiating primary from secondary mucinous adenocarcinomas of the ovary.

Immunohistochemistry as a diagnostic aid in the evaluation of ovarian tumors

Aspects of immunohistochemistry (IHC), which are useful in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors (mostly neoplasms but also a few tumor-like lesions), are discussed. The topic is first approached by considering the different growth patterns and cell types that may be encountered. Then a few other specific situations in which IHC may assist are reviewed. Selected findings largely, or only, of academic interest are also mentioned. One of the most common situations in which IHC may aid is in the evaluation of tumors with follicles or other patterns which bring a sex cord-stromal tumor into the differential. The distinction between a sex cord tumor and an endometrioid carcinoma with sex-cord-like patterns may be greatly aided by the triad of epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), inhibin, and calretinin, the latter two being typically positive and EMA negative in sex cord tumors, the converse being typical of endometrioid carcinoma. It should be emphasized that granulosa cell tumors may be inhibin negative and, albeit less specific, calretinin is more reliable in evaluating this particular issue. Lack of staining for inhibin and calretinin may also be supportive in leading to consideration of diverse other neoplasms that may form follicles, including metastatic tumors as varied as carcinoid and melanoma. The well-known staining of the latter neoplasm for S-100 protein and HMB-45 may be very helpful in evaluating melanomas with follicular or other unusual patterns, a challenging aspect of ovarian tumor interpretation. The most common monodermal teratoma, struma ovarii, usually has an overt follicular pattern and is easily recognized, but recognition of unusual appearances ranging from oxyphilic to clear cell to various patterns of malignant struma may be greatly aided by a thyroglobulin or TTF 1 stain. IHC for neuroendocrine markers may assist in the diagnosis of primary and metastatic carcinoid tumor. The broad differential diagnosis of glandular neoplasms with an endometrioid-pseudoendometrioid morphology, or mucinous cell type, has been the subject of much exploration in recent years, particularly the distinction between primary and metastatic neoplasms. The well-known CK7 positive, CK20 negative phenotype of primary endometrioid carcinoma, and the converse profile in most metastatic large intestinal adenocarcinomas with a pseudoendometrioid morphology, has been much publicized but albeit an appropriate supportive adjunct in many cases, exceptions from the typical staining pattern may be encountered. It is even less helpful in the case of primary versus metastatic mucinous neoplasia. Evaluation of the expression of mucin gene products has shown mixed, essentially unreliable, results. Experience with other new markers, such as CDX-2, villin, beta catenin, and P504S (racemase), is limited but is in aggregate promising with regard to providing some aid in this area. The rare differential of metastatic cervical adenocarcinoma versus primary ovarian mucinous or endometrioid carcinoma may be aided by strong p16 staining of the former. Staining for alpha-fetoprotein may aid in confirming the diagnosis of endometrioid-like (and hepatoid) variants of yolk sac tumor. Ependymoma of the ovary may also have an endometrioid-like glandular pattern, but positive stains for glial fibrillary acidic protein contrast with the negative results in others neoplasms with a similar pattern. Immunostains may be very helpful in the evaluation of oxyphilic tumors and tumor-like lesions and in some unusual forms of clear cell neoplasia, such as clear cell struma, both subjects being reviewed herein. Immunostains may highlight both the presence and extent of epithelial cells in a variety of circumstances, including microinvasive foci in cases of serous borderline tumors and mucinous carcinomas, and in determining the extent of carcinoma cells and reactive cells within mural nodules of mucinous neoplasms. As in tumor pathology in general, various markers may be crucial in the diagnosis of small round cell tumors of the ovary, and familiar markers of epithelial, lymphoid, leukemic, and melanocytic neoplasms may assist in the analysis of high grade tumors with a poorly differentiated carcinoma, lymphoma-granulocytic sarcoma, malignant melanoma differential. The evaluation of ovarian cystic lesions may be aided by thyroglobulin or TTF 1 (cystic struma), glial fibrillary acid protein (ependymal cysts), and inhibin-calretinin (follicle cysts and unilocular granulosa cell tumors). Stains for trophoblast markers may occasionally aid in the evaluation of germ cell tumors, although routine stains should usually suffice; they may be of academic interest in confirming trophoblastic differentiation in some high grade surface epithelial carcinomas.

Ovarian involvement by metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma: still a diagnostic challenge

Ovarian involvement by metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, although not an uncommon occurrence, remains a diagnostic challenge. The gross and histologic features of such metastases overlap those of primary ovarian epithelial neoplasms such as endometrioid or mucinous adenocarcinoma. The clinical and pathologic features of 86 cases of metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma involving the ovary were reviewed. Patients ranged in age from 19 to 85 years (median, 51 years); 24% were younger than 40 years. Presenting symptoms included abdominal or pelvic pain (45 cases), rectal bleeding (13 cases), change in bowel habits (20 cases), and vaginal bleeding (5 cases). In 23 cases, an ovarian mass was the first manifestation of the disease. Ovarian involvement was bilateral in 49 cases and unilateral in 33 (including 20 cases in which the only involved ovary measured at least 10 cm in greatest dimension). Involved ovaries ranged from 2 to 24 cm (mean, 10.1 cm), and most featured both solid and cystic areas. Many involved ovaries featured smooth capsules without gross evidence of surface involvement by tumor. In general, the tumors had typical histologic features of metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, including a garland pattern and dirty necrosis. In 23 cases, foci with a benign or low malignant potential appearance were seen. Immunohistochemical studies showed that 29 of 29 tumors (100%) were positive for CK20; focal CK7 positivity was seen in 5 of 30 cases (17%). In 9 of the cases, an ovarian primary was diagnosed or favored initially, and 5 of these cases were initially treated as ovarian primaries. Metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of an ovarian mass, even if the mass is large and unilateral or in a young patient, to secure proper treatment of these patients.

Metastatic neoplasms involving the ovary: a review with an emphasis on morphological and immunohistochemical features

The ovary is a common site of metastatic tumour. In many cases of ovarian metastasis there is a known history of malignancy but in other cases the ovarian tumour is the first manifestation of disease. In this review metastatic colorectal, appendiceal, gastric, breast, pancreatic and biliary tract, hepatocellular, renal, transitional and cervical carcinomas and metastatic malignant melanoma involving the ovary are discussed, as is the issue of synchronous ovarian and endometrial carcinomas. Peritoneal tumours, including primary peritoneal carcinoma, mesothelioma and intra-abdominal desmoplastic small round cell tumour, involving the ovary are also discussed, together with a variety of other rare, metastatic ovarian neoplasms. Many metastatic adenocarcinomas involving the ovary, especially those exhibiting mucinous differentiation, closely mimic primary ovarian adenocarcinomas with morphologically bland areas simulating benign and borderline cystadenoma. This is referred to as a maturation phenomenon. In recent years immunohistochemistry, especially but not exclusively differential cytokeratin (CK7 and CK20) staining, has been widely used as an aid to distinguish between a primary and secondary ovarian adenocarcinoma. While immunohistochemistry undoubtedly has a valuable role to play and is paramount in diagnosis in some cases, the results must be interepreted with caution, especially in mucinous tumours, and within the relevant clinical context. We feel the significance of differential cytokeratin staining is not always understood by histopathologists and this can result in erroneous interpretation. We critically discuss the value of immunohistochemistry and associated pitfalls with each tumour type described.

Diagnostic challenge of secondary (metastatic) ovarian tumors simulating primary endometrioid and mucinous neoplasms

Secondary (metastatic) neoplasms to the ovary often cause diagnostic problems, especially those tumors that produce large, symptomatic ovarian tumors that masquerade clinically and pathologically as primary ovarian tumors of surface epithelial type. Most of these tumors arise from organs of the digestive system. Except for typical Krukenberg tumors, which usually originate in the stomach and generally are easily recognized, the most diagnostically problematic secondary ovarian tumors are those that originate in the large intestine, appendix, and pancreas. Metastases from these sites typically produce histologic patterns resembling primary ovarian endometrioid carcinoma or mucinous epithelial neoplasms of borderline and malignant types. This review focuses on the diagnostic challenge of distinguishing these secondary ovarian tumors from primary ovarian neoplasms. Studies on useful or potentially applicable immunohistochemical stains are also detailed.